P44. Assessment of Posterolateral Fusion Rates With BMP-2 and Resorbable Ceramic Granules
-
Upload
edward-sun -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of P44. Assessment of Posterolateral Fusion Rates With BMP-2 and Resorbable Ceramic Granules
![Page 1: P44. Assessment of Posterolateral Fusion Rates With BMP-2 and Resorbable Ceramic Granules](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022020408/575091551a28abbf6b9d7422/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
CONCLUSIONS: Insertion of an oversized disc prosthesis resulted in
a biomechanical response that was similar to the fused spine condition.
In spinal arthroplasty, over-correction of disc angulation and height may
compromise subsequent disc mobility and function.
FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: Kineflex lumbar disc prosthesis: Inves-
tigational/not approved.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Authors (DD, KF) Grant/Research Sup-
port: Spinal Motion.
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.06.302
P44. Assessment of Posterolateral Fusion Rates With BMP-2
and Resorbable Ceramic Granules
Edward Sun, MD1, James Reynolds, MD2, Paul Slosar, Jr., MD1,
Noel Goldthwaite, MD1; 1San Francisco Spine Institute, Daly City, CA,
USA; 2Spine Care Medical Group Inc., Daly City, CA, USA
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The use of rhBMP-2 with resorbable ce-
ramic granules has been shown to have superior fusion rate compared with
iliac crest bone graft. However, the clinical studies often utilize high doses
of rhBMP-2 (40 mg/level). The rate of fusion using commercially available
doses of rhBMP-2 (5 to 15 mg/level) has not been reported. In addition, the
use of rhBMP-2 in posterolateral fusion for patients with failed previous
spinal fusions has not been examined.
PURPOSE: To assess the posterolateral fusion rate using rhBMP-2 and
resorbable ceramic granules in a consecutive group of patients undergoing
either primary or revision posterior spinal surgery.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review at a single institution.
PATIENT SAMPLE: All patients who underwent posterolateral fusions
using rhBMP-2 (at 1.5 mg/cc concentration) and resorbable ceramic gran-
ules (15% HA/85% beta-tricalcium phosphate) were identified by com-
puter database with minimum 12-month follow-up.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiographic analysis of the fusion rate using
CT scan.
METHODS: All patients had CT scans with 2-mm cuts 12 months after
surgery. Fusion status was graded using modified Bridwell-Lenke criteria:
solid bilateral fusion with trabeculated transverse processes (grade I), thick
unilateral fusion mass (grade II), defects in fusion mass bilaterally (grade
III), or definite graft resorption (grade IV).
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were identified from a computer database
with mean follow-up of 15 months. Average patient age was 53 (range 35-
83), and 18 patients (72%) had prior spinal procedures. Majority had failed
back surgery syndrome with pseudoarthrosis (8 patients) or adjacent level
degeneration (8 patients). Concurrent iliac crest bone graft was used in
24% of patients. Fusion status was rated as grade I in 11 patients (44%),
grade II in 12 patients (48%), and grade III in 2 patients (8%). None of
the patients had grade IV fusion. Patients without prior lumbar surgery
had statistically higher bilateral solid fusion rate (grade I) compared with
those with prior surgeries (p!.05). The use of spinal instrumentation and
concurrent use of iliac crest bone graft also showed a trend towards higher
fusion rate although the difference was not statistically significant (pO.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of rhBMP-2 and ceramic granules can be ef-
fective in inducing posterolateral fusion even in patients with failed previ-
ous spinal fusion. However, only 44% of patients achieved solid bilateral
intertransverse fusion and an additional 48% achieved solid unilateral in-
tertransverse fusion. The rate of bilateral pseudoarthrosis was 8% in this
group of patients.
FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: rhBMP-2: Not approved for this
indication.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Author (ES) Grant/Research Support:
Medtronic.
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.06.303
P45. How Increasing Lumbar Disc Space Height Affects the Lumbar
Facet Joint
Jiayong Liu, MD, Nabil A. Ebraheim, MD, Steve P. Haman, MD, Chris
G. Sanford, Jr., BS, Richard A. Yeasting, PhD; Medical University of Ohio,
Toledo, OH, USA
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The surgeon often destructs the disc space
in order to implant a larger artificial disc in an attempt to keep the artificial
disc stable. However, it is hypothesized by the current authors that such
a procedure can have an adverse effect on the facet joints and may result
in instability at this level. No study has addressed the effect that increasing
disc space height has on the facet joints.
PURPOSE: Demonstrate how facet joint articulation is affected by in-
creasing disc space height in the lumbar spine.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A computer-simulated prospective study
involving computed tomography images of lumbar spine cadaveric
specimens.
PATIENT SAMPLE: CT images of 15 cadaveric lumbar spine specimens
were used. Five of these 15 were dissected for validation and standardiza-
tion of measurements.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Sagittal plane CT images were used to mea-
sure the change in the facet joint articulation overlap and facet joint space
after incremental increases in lumbar disc space height.
METHODS: Computerized tomography images in the plane passing
through the center of the L3 to S1 facet joints (sagittal plane) on the right
and left sides were obtained for 15 cadaveric lumbar spine specimens. The
articulation overlap of the facet joint at L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1 were
measured with Aquarius Image software at the CT scanner’s TeraRecon
Aquarius Workstation. The images were then manipulated. A 1-mm incre-
mental increase to a total 5 mm from L3 to S1 disc spaces was performed
to simulate an increase of the disc space height. NIH Image J software
(V1.33m) was then used to measure the change of the facet joint articula-
tion overlap in the sagittal plane on both sides at normal and each displace-
ment level. The joint space was also measured at each 1-mm increase in
disc space height. Validation was done on 5 of the 15 whole lumbar spine
specimens by comparing the same distances on the spine using the Aquar-
ius Image software at the CT scanner’s TeraRecon Aquarius Workstation,
the NIH Image J software, and a ruler directly on the specimen.
RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the measure-
ments on the CT images and the gross specimens (pO.05). In 15 speci-
mens, the mean facet joint articulation overlap in the sagittal plane was
16.2961.20 mm (left) and 16.2261.16 (right) at the L3-4 level,
17.8161.18 mm (left) and 17.7461.18 mm (right) at the L4-5 level, and
18.1861.18 mm (left) and 18.2361.15 mm (right) at the L5-S1 level.
There was no significant difference between the measured values on the
left and right sides (pO.05). Each 1-mm incremental increase in disc space
at the L3-4 level translated to a decrease in the facet joint articulation over-
lap in the sagittal plane by approximately 6% while the mean facet joint
Fig. 1. Normalized motion for oversized disc and fused spine conditions.
105SProceedings of the NASS 21st Annual Meetings / The Spine Journal 6 (2006) 1S–161S