P RELIMINARY F INDINGS F ALL 2013 P ILOT D ATA R EPORT PA12-40 R EMEDIATION C ONFERENCE M IDDLESEX C...
-
Upload
kristin-simmons -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of P RELIMINARY F INDINGS F ALL 2013 P ILOT D ATA R EPORT PA12-40 R EMEDIATION C ONFERENCE M IDDLESEX C...
PRELIMINARY FINDINGSFALL 2013 PILOT DATA REPORT
PA12-40 REMEDIATION CONFERENCEMIDDLESEX COMMUNITY COLLEGEAPRIL 11, 2014
AYNSLEY DIAMOND, ED.D.TRANSFER AND ARTICULATION POLICY PROGRAM
MANAGER
BENJAMIN KLIMCZAK, M.S.SENIOR RESEARCH ANALYST
CONTEXT/ GOALSPublic Act 12-40
Multiple Measures of Student Assessment
Assessment outcomes determine student placement in either:
• Embedded
• Intensive
• College readiness program (transitional) instruction
Persistence and Retention
Student Success
WHAT WE DID
136 Pilots in Fall 2013 semester
Variation of Method and Design and Instruction
Trends, Forecasting and Planning are not to be inferred from this data
WARNING - These data are only for PILOTS!
FALL 2013 UNDERGRADUATE ENROLLMENT – OVERALL & REMEDIAL
InstitutionUndergraduate
Enrollment
Enrollment in Remedial Course
(English and/or Math)
Fall 2013 # #Percentage of
Remedial Enrollment
CSU & COSC 28,699 1,238 9%
CCC 56,976 12,981 91%
ConnSCU 85,675 14,219
CCC STUDENTS REGISTRATION FOR REMEDIAL COURSES
FALL TERMS: 2011 THROUGH 2013
Fall Term
New Students Other Student Types All Students
CCCEnrollment
Registered for Remedial Course CCC
Enrollment
Registered for Remedial Course CCC
Enrollment
Registered for Remedial Course
# % # % # %
2013 11,491 6,836 59% 45,485 6,145 14% 56,976 12,981 23%
2012 11,765 7,607 65% 46,463 6,935 15% 58,228 14,542 25%
2011 11,678 7,791 67% 45,474 7,109 16% 57,152 14,900 26%
WITHDRAWAL RATES (INCLUDING FALL 2012 CONVENTIONAL DATA)
Conventional (Fall 2012)
Conventional (Fall 2013)
Embedded (Fall 2013)
Intensive (Fall 2013)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
7%8%
13%
9%
11%12%
15%
12%
EnglishMath
NEW STUDENTS COMPLETION STATUS
(ENGLISH AND/OR MATH)
Course TypeEnrolled Successful
# #Success
Rate
Remedial - Embedded 758 536 71%
Remedial - Intensive 699 462 66%
Remedial - Conventional 6,340 4,718 74%
College Level 4,484 3,825 85%
AVERAGE GRADE POINT – REMEDIAL COURSES(INCLUDING FALL 2012 CONVENTIONAL DATA)
Conventional (Fall 2012)
Conventional (Fall 2013)
Embedded (Fall 2013)
Intensive (Fall 2013)
English 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.0
Math 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.6
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.01.6 1.6
1.8 1.6
What happened in spring?
What happened to remedial mathemat-
ics students in Spring 2014?
Embedded Intensive Conventional0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
13% 12% 13%
What happened in spring?
Did not register
Embedded Intensive Conventional0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%10%
26%
What happened in spring?
RepeatedDid not register
Embedded Intensive Conventional0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
87%78%
61%
What happened in spring?
Did not repeatRepeatedDid not register
What happened in spring?
What happened to remedial English stu-dents in Spring 2014?
Embedded Intensive Conventional0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
8% 9%16%
What happened in spring?
Did not register
Embedded Intensive Conventional0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%2%
24%
What happened in spring?
RepeatedDid not register
Embedded Intensive Conventional0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
92% 89%
60%
What happened in spring?
Did not repeatRepeatedDid not register
WHAT’S NEXT
• Disaggregate data to determine outliers
• Institutional model analysis
• RFQ – independent analysis of models; qualitative component
• Summer 2013 Evaluate transitional levels
SOURCE INFORMATION:
Prepared by: ConnSCU, Board of Regents for Higher Education - Office of Policy and Research
Data Source: Institutional Research Database
IRDB Query: IRDB_RemedialEnrollment_V20140407