Oxford Brookes University10 th Annual Coaching & Mentoring Conference 16.1.14
-
Upload
troy-jenkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
15 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Oxford Brookes University10 th Annual Coaching & Mentoring Conference 16.1.14
Oxford Brookes University10th Annual Coaching & Mentoring Conference 16.1.14
Transition to ‘civvy street’ difficult and complex (FiMT report 2013)
Skills and strengths not always obviously transferable
Limited resources – need for clarity & robust choices
Can strengths coaching offer a potential solution?
How might a strengths coaching intervention be used to help transitioning military find direction?
Usability: easily identify strengths?Engagement: reactions to toolEffectiveness: was it useful in finding direction?Transferability: blueprint for future coaching?
Evidence that strengths identification & use increases both performance and well-being
No direct evidence linking this to direction, although some links to passions/interests
Little research into how strengths interventions work, or how to do them
Interpretivist-constructivist paradigm Qualitative research – 6 transitioning military Purposive heterogeneous sample Action Research – 2 full cycles Used 24 strengths cards based on the Values-In-
Action Inventory (Peterson & Seligman, 2004)
Data collection: full transcripts, reflexive diary, observation, semi-structured questionnaires
Data trustworthiness: reflexive diary & critical friends
Thematic analysis to interpret data – amalgamation of inductive & deductive coding.
Effective in eliciting narrative◦Coming to terms with leaving the military and
taking stock of present position
Effective in exploring identity◦Reconciling authentic self and military self◦Identifying authentic strengths and
weaknesses - and accepting weaknesses
“You’re given a job, and expected to perform against these standards. So after a few years – what really is me? You need to find yourself, get grounded. It’s where you start and stop, and where the military bit starts and stops.”
Generating a vision◦Strengths insufficient on their own – required
values and interests/passions discussions.
Exploring job fit◦Useful start-point for job criteria.
“I want to find out what it is I really enjoy and why, and I want to see if I can find another jobs that satisfies that.”
Using strengths with coaching goals◦Most chose to work on weaknesses, and tune
down strengths.
“I find working on weakness more motivating. I find strengths comforting. Strengths make me think that I could get a job, but the weaknesses could be the reasons I may not get one, so knowing them and attacking them is a way to drive yourself forwards.”
Useful focus in job search process◦Provided a language for communicating via
CV, at interview or social media◦Helped bridge the military-civilian language
barrier
“You’ve got to show that you’re commercially aware, and explain military to non-military. If they ask you about leading a team in a high pressure environment, and the answer is about being shot at in Afghanistan, how do you relate that to a commercial environment?”
Compass Tools Springboard
Client sets priority goals using strengths
Refine and identify key strengths for use
in transition
Build coaching alliance
Identify strengths & weaknesses
Make sense of current position
Reaffirm authentic self
Discuss values & interests
Reconciling with past
Establishing client goals
Generate job ideas
Build key Job criteria
Compare and contrast jobs against criteria
Start to build future vision
Effective approach for a complex transition: prompts narrative about past, present and future
Helpful vehicle for separating military vs individual identity: addressed ‘strengths blindness’
Coach training in narrative and strengths processes
Future research into using weaknesses vs. strengths, or a combination – client education or trial and error?
Growth vs. fixed mind-set Future research: the military ‘superstrings’?
Figure 2: Action Research Cycles
Session 1 Session 2 Session 3
Cycle 1 Cycle 2
Plan:
Action
Evaluate
Reflect
Use questions and/or Realise2 framework to
provide structure for SCI. A4 goal sheet. Questionnaire
Need simpler solution for goals & strengths
Use cards physically?
Values and interests discussion is necessary
Some choosing to tune down strengths/work on weaknesses
Strengths cards intervention, Goal
setting with strengths
Discuss job criteria to compare and shortlist
job options
Generate job ideas, Values & interests. Goals with strengths
Use criteria to discuss job options. Growth vs. fixed mind-
set discussion
Questionnaire
Use tools to generate & evaluating job ideas e.g. wheel
of work, questions, values discussion. Bridges model to
prompt narrative. Questionnaire
Most prefer to work on weaknesses or tune down. Self-selecting strengths
seems empowering, and can do without writing down. Growth mind-set
= key
Wheel is useful comparison tool – use on past or present jobs? Selecting cards useful for goals
On-going desire to tune down strengths or work on weaknesses, and increase vitality
Explain energizing use of strengths? Need help with strategies for navigating neutral zone. Need strengths reminder.
Some want more structure. Longer time period. Choice of interventions.