Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging
-
Upload
state-of-utah-salt-lake-city -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
280 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging
![Page 1: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging
April 28, 2011
Produced by the Data Acquisition, Utilization, and Management Team
![Page 2: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
BREAST CANCER SCREENING MAMMOGRAM
![Page 3: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Table 1. Current Mammography Trends
Year Utah US
2006 67.81% 76.14%
2007 67.29% 76.10%
2008 67.20% 76.22%
2010 66.36% NA
Source: BRFSS
![Page 4: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
BREAST CANCER SCREENING Mammography in the past 2 years
Utah Women 40+
201066.4%
Target81.1%
AgeYes
Race/EthnicityNo
GeographyNo
InsuranceYes
SexN/A
EducationYes
Significant Difference?
Data Source: 2010 BRFSS
![Page 5: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
55.72
71.92 73.05
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
40‐49 50‐64 65+
Mam
mog
raph
y Pe
rcen
tage
Figure 1. Mammography within the Past Two Years, Women Ages 40 and Older, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate66.36%
![Page 6: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
65.24 63.2757.66
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Non‐Hispanic White Hispanic Other
Mam
mog
raph
y Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 2. Mammography within the Past Two Years*, Women Ages 40 and Older, by Race/Ethnicity, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate66.36%
![Page 7: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
66.79 66.5260.91
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Urban Rural Frontier
Mam
mog
raph
y Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 3. Mammography within the Past Two Years*, Women Ages 40 and Older, by Geographic Area, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate66.36%
![Page 8: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
68.46
49.44
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Yes No
Mam
mograph
y Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 4. Mammography within the Past Two Years*, Utah Women Ages 40 and Older, by Insurance Status, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate66.36%
![Page 10: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
48.9
66.37 65.8169.77
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
<HS HS/GED HS+ College
Mam
mog
raph
y Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 5. Mammography within the Past Two Years*, Women 40 and Older, by Education, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate66.36%
![Page 11: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Table 2. Mammography for Women Ages 40 Years and Older by Health Insurance Type
2007 2008 2009
Commercial HMO State Average 58.90% 59.76% 59.62%
Commercial HMO National Average 69.10% 69.90% 70.48%
Medicaid HMO State Average 49.20% 51.39% 50.80%
Medicaid HMO National Average 49.83% 50.70% 52.31%
Source: Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS)
![Page 12: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
89.4
51.1
9.6 1.5
106.3
52.4
10.6 3.60
20
40
60
80
100
120
Localized Regional Distant Unstaged
Breast Can
cer Incide
nce pe
r 100,000 Females
*Rates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence
Figure 6. Breast Cancer Incidence in Women Ages 20 Years and Older*, by Stage, Utah vs. U.S. 2003‐2007
Utah
U.S.
![Page 13: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
CERVICAL CANCER SCREENINGPAP TEST
![Page 14: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Table 3. Current Pap Test Trends
Year Utah US
2006 79.03% 84.85%
2007 75.11% 83.49%
2008 74.11% 82.24%
2010 73.95% NA
Source: BRFSS
![Page 15: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING Pap Test in the past 3 years
Utah Women 18+
201074.0%
Target93.0%
AgeYes
Race/EthnicityYes
GeographyYes
InsuranceYes
SexN/A
EducationNo
Significant Difference?
Data Source: 2010 BRFSS
![Page 16: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
67.31
84.09 81.42
57.75
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
18‐34 35‐49 50‐64 65+
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
Figure 7. Pap Test within the Past Three Years, Utah Women Ages 18 Years and Older, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate73.95%
![Page 17: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
73.7382.81
75.76
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Non‐Hispanic White Hispanic Other
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 8. Pap Test within the Past Three Years*, Utah Women Ages 18 Years and Older, by Race/Ethnicity, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate73.95%
![Page 18: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
75.43
69.3570.79
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
Urban Rural Frontier
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 9. Pap Test within the Past Three Years*, Utah Women Ages 18 Years and Older, by Geographic Area, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate73.95%
![Page 19: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
75.4264.15
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Yes No
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 10. Pap Test within the Past Three Years*, Utah Women Ages 18 Years and Older, by Insurance Status, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate73.95%
![Page 20: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
71.87 76.74 77.2982.83
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
<HS HS/GED HS+ College
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 11. Pap Test within the Past Three Years*, Utah Women Ages 18 Years and Older, by Education, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate73.95%
![Page 21: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Table 4. Pap Test for Women Ages 21 to 80 Years by Health Insurance Type
2007 2008 2009
Commercial HMO State Average 79.00% 78.39% 73.28%
Commercial HMO National Average 81.70% 81.34% 77.27%
Medicaid HMO State Average 60.87% 58.45% 66.26%
Medicaid HMO National Average 64.75% 65.91% 65.65%
Source: Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS)
![Page 22: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
3.83.1
0.7 0.1
5.5
4.2
1.20.6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Localized Regional Distant Unstaged
Cervical Can
cer Incide
nce pe
r 100,000 Females
*Rates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence
Figure 12. Cervical Cancer Incidence in Women Ages 20 Years and Older*, by Stage, Utah vs. U.S. 2003‐2007
Utah
U.S.
![Page 23: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL CANCER
![Page 24: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Table 5. Current Colorectal Cancer Screening Trends
Year Utah US
2004 57.70% 57.32%
2006 61.50% 61.26%
2008 66.80% 64.61%
2010 68.80% NA
Source: BRFSS
![Page 25: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
COLON CANCER SCREENING Either an FOBT in the past year or a
Sigmoidoscopy/Colonoscopy within the past 10 years Utah Adults 50+
201068.8%
Target80.0%
AgeYes
Race/EthnicityYes
GeographyYes
InsuranceYes
SexNo
EducationYes
Significant Difference?
Data Source: 2010 BRFSS
![Page 26: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
63.24
75.99
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
50‐64 65+
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Either a fecal occult blood test within the past year or sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy in the past 10 years.
Figure 13. Colorectal Cancer Screening* Among Utah Adults 50 and Older by Age, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate68.8%
![Page 27: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
69.84
67.83
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
Male Female
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Either a fecal occult blood test within the past year or sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy in the past 10 years. Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 14. Colorectal Cancer Screening* Among Utah Adults 50 and Older by Sex, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate68.8%
![Page 28: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
69.38
52.71 56.19
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Non‐Hispanic White Hispanic Other
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Either a fecal occult blood test within the past year or sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy in the past 10 years. Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 15. Colorectal Cancer Screening* Among Utah Adults 50 and Older by Race/Ethnicity, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate68.8%
![Page 29: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
70.84 67.9756.36
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Urban Rural Frontier
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Either a fecal occult blood test within the past year or sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy in the past 10 years. Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 16. Colorectal Cancer Screening* Among Utah Adults 50 and Older by Geographic Area, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate68.8%
![Page 30: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
70.63
48.29
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Yes No
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Either a fecal occult blood test within the past year or sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy in the past 10 years. Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 17. Colorectal Cancer Screening* Among Utah Adults 50 and Older by Insurance Status, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate68.8%
![Page 31: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
43.32
65.11 66.7376.55
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
<HS HS/GED HS+ College
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Either a fecal occult blood test within the past year or sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy in the past 10 years. Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 18. Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Utah Adults 50 and Older*, by Education, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate68.8%
![Page 32: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Table 6. Colorectal Cancer Screening for Utah Adults Aged 51 to 80 Years by Health Insurance Type
2007 2008 2009
Commercial HMO State Average 55.80% 55.01% 59.16%
Commercial HMO National Average 55.60% 59.08% 60.32%
Medicaid HMO State Average Not Available Not Available Not Available
Medicaid HMO National Average Not Available Not Available Not Available
Source: Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS)
![Page 33: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
25.6
16.2
9
1.8
27.9
23.1
12.8
3.80
5
10
15
20
25
30
Localized Regional Distant Unstaged
Colon Ca
ncer In
cide
nce pe
r 100,000 Po
pulation
*Rates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence
Figure 19. Colon Cancer Incidence in Adults Ages 20 Years and Older*, by Stage, Utah vs. U.S. 2003‐2007
Utah
U.S.
![Page 34: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Figure 20. Colon Cancer Incidence by Stage, Utah vs. US, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Distant41.3%
Unstaged34.2%
Localized18.9%
Regional5.6%
US
Distant48.7%
Unstaged30.8%
Localized17.1%
Regional3.4%
Utah
![Page 35: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Figure 21. Male Colon Cancer Incidence by Stage, Utah vs. US, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Distant17.0%
Unstaged3.0%
Localized50.7%
Regional29.2%
Utah
Distant18.8%
Unstaged5.7%
Localized42.1%
Regional33.4%
US
![Page 36: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Figure 22. Female Colon Cancer Incidence by Stage*, Utah vs. US, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Distant17.4%
Unstaged3.8%
Localized46.3%
Regional32.5%
Utah
Distant18.9%
Unstaged5.8%
Localized40.5%
Regional34.9%
US
![Page 37: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
SCREENING FOR PROSTATE CANCER
![Page 38: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Table 7. Current Prostate Cancer Screening Trends
Year Utah US
2004 58.16% 61.28%
2006 60.12% 61.76%
2008 60.71% 64.02%
2010 62.50% NA
Source: BRFSS
![Page 39: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING Utah Men 40+ Who have ever had a PSA
201062.5%
TargetUnknown
AgeYes
Race/EthnicityYes
GeographyNo
InsuranceYes
SexN/A
EducationYes
Significant Difference?
Data Source: 2010 BRFSS
![Page 40: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
32.8
72.47
87.97
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
40‐49 50‐64 65+
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
Figure 23. Utah Males Ages 40 and Older who Ever had a PSA, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate62.5%
![Page 41: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
58.74
39.36
54.51
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Non‐Hispanic White Hispanic Other
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 24. PSA Among Utah Males Ages 40 and Older*, by Ethnicity/Race, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate62.5%
![Page 42: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
63.75 60.77 59.09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Urban Rural Frontier
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 25. PSA Among Utah Males Ages 40 and Older*, by Geographic Area, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate62.5%
![Page 43: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
64.46
47.73
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Yes No
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 26. PSA Among Utah Males Ages 40 and Older*, by Insurance Status, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate62.5%
![Page 44: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
41.4
57.7963.62 66.75
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
< High School High School Graduate or GED Some Post High School College Graduate
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 27. PSA Among Utah Males Ages 40 and Over*, by Education,BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate62.5%
![Page 45: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
239.1
7.5 4
199.1
9.8 10.30
50
100
150
200
250
300
Localized/regional (Prostate cases) Distant Unstaged
Prostate Can
cer Incide
nce pe
r 100,000 Males
*Rates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence
Figure 28. Prostate Cancer Incidence in Men Ages 20 Years and Older*, by Stage, Utah vs. U.S. 2003‐2007
Utah
U.S.
![Page 46: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
SMOKING AS AN INDICATOR FOR LUNG CANCER
![Page 47: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Table 8. Current Cigarette Smoking Trends
Year Utah US
2007 11.21% 19.56%
2008 9.11% 18.57%
2009 9.47% 18.26%
2010 8.81% NA
Source: BRFSS
![Page 48: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
CIGARETTE SMOKING Current Cigarette Smokers
Utah Adults 18+
20108.8%
Target9.5%
AgeYes
Race/EthnicityYes
GeographyYes
InsuranceYes
SexYes
EducationYes
Significant Difference?
Data Source: 2010 BRFSS
![Page 49: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
10.68
8.69.76
4.59
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
18‐34 35‐49 50‐64 65+
Smok
ing Pe
rcen
tage
Figure 29. Cigarette Smoking by Age Among Utah Adults, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate8.81%
![Page 50: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
10.11
7.48
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
Male Female
Smok
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 30. Cigarette Smoking Among Utah Adults* by Sex, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate8.81%
![Page 51: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
8.749.83
13.77
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Non‐Hispanic White Hispanic Other
Smok
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 31. Cigarette Smoking Among Utah Adults* by Ethnicity/Race BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate8.81%
![Page 52: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
8.527.56
15.07
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Urban Rural Frontier
Smok
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 32. Cigarette Smoking Among Utah Adults* by Geographic AreaBRFSS 2010
2010 Rate8.81%
![Page 53: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
7.22
16.38
0
5
10
15
20
25
Yes No
Smok
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 33. Cigarette Smoking Among Utah Adults* by Insurance Status,BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate8.81%
![Page 54: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
25.92
16.12
7.312.18
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
< High School High School Graduate or GED
Some Post High School College Graduate
Smok
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 34. Cigarette Smoking Among Utah Adults* by Education, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate8.81%
![Page 55: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
5.34%6.13%
8.50%
10.35%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
9th grade 10th grade 11th grade 12th grade
Figure 35. Current Youth Cigarette Use by School Grade, Utah, YRBS 2003, 2005, 2007
2010 Rate8.81%
![Page 56: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
6.8 9
22.4
2.5
16.320.4
45.1
7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Localized Regional Distant Unstaged
Lung
Can
cer Incide
nce pe
r 100,000 Po
pulation
*Rates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence
Figure 36. Lung Cancer Incidence in Adults Ages 20 and Older*, by Stage, Utah vs. U.S. 2003‐2007
Utah
U.S.
![Page 57: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Figure 37. Lung Cancer Incidence by Stage, Utah vs. US*, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Localized16.7%
Regional22.1%
Distant55.0%
Unstaged6.1%
Utah
Localized18.4%
Regional23.0%
Distant50.8%
Unstaged7.9%
US
![Page 58: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Figure 38. Male Lung Cancer Incidence by Stage, Utah vs. US*, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Localized20.6%
Regional22.7%
Distant50.6%
Unstaged6.1%
Utah
Localized16.8%
Regional23.0%
Distant52.1%
Unstaged8.1%
US
![Page 59: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Figure 39. Female Lung Cancer Incidence by Stage, Utah vs. US*, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Localized20.6%
Regional22.7%
Distant50.6%
Unstaged6.1%
Utah
Localized20.3%
Regional22.7%
Distant49.3%
Unstaged7.8%
US
![Page 60: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
SUN SAFETY AS AN INDICATOR FOR MELANOMA
![Page 61: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Table 9. Current Sun Safety Trends
Year Utah US
2007 65.90% NA
2008 64.85% NA
2009 65.60% NA
2010 65.04% NA
Source: BRFSS
![Page 62: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
SUN SAFETYSun Safety PracticesUtah Adults 18+
201065.0%
Target 201580.1%
AgeYes
Race/EthnicityNo
GeographyNo
InsuranceNo
SexNo
EducationNo
Significant Difference?
Data Source: 2010 BRFSS
![Page 63: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
54.62
69.32 68.25
77.54
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
18‐34 35‐49 50‐64 65+
Sun Safety Percentage
Figure 40. Sun Safety Practices Among Utah Adults by Age, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate65.04%
![Page 64: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
62.87
67.91
58
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
Male Female
Sun Safety Percentage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 41. Sun Safety Practices Among Utah Adults* by Sex, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate65.04%
![Page 65: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
65.06 68.37 67.67
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Non‐Hispanic White Hispanic Other
Sun Safety Percentage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 42. Sun Safety Practices Among Utah Adults* by Ethnicity/Race, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate65.04%
![Page 66: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
65.32 65.15 64.53
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Urban Rural Frontier
Sun Safety Percentage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 43. Sun Safety Practices Among Utah Adults* by Geographic Area, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate65.04%
![Page 67: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
64.89 64.51
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Yes No
Sun Safety Percentage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 44. Sun Safety Practices Among Utah Adults* by Health Insurance Status, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate65.04%
![Page 68: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
66.97 64.9570.82 70.67
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
< High School High School Graduate or GED
Some Post High School College Graduate
Sun Safety Percentage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 45. Sun Safety Practices Among Utah Adults* by Education, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate65.04%
![Page 69: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
31
4.3 1.4 0.6
23
2.6 1.1 10
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Localized Regional Distant Unstaged
Melan
oma incide
nce pe
r 100,000 Po
pulation
*Rates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence
Figure 46. Melanoma Incidence in Adults Ages 20 and Older*, by Stage, Utah vs. U.S. 2003‐2007
Utah
U.S.
![Page 70: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Figure 47. Melanoma Incidence by Stage, Utah vs. US*, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Localized83.1%
Regional11.5%
Distant3.8%
Unstaged1.6%
Utah
Localized81.4%
Regional10.5%
Distant4.5%
Unstaged3.7%
US
![Page 71: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Figure 48. Melanoma Incidence in Non‐Hispanic Whites by Stage, Utah vs. US*, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Localized83.4%
Regional11.2%
Distant3.7%
Unstaged1.7%
Utah
Localized83.6%
Regional9.2%
Distant3.7%
Unstaged3.4%
US
![Page 72: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Figure 49. Melanoma Incidence in Hispanics by Stage, Utah vs. US*, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Localized60.2%
Regional30.7%
Distant4.5%
Unstaged4.5%
Utah
Localized70.5%
Regional16.4%
Distant8.2%
Unstaged4.9%
US
![Page 73: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Figure 50. Melanoma Incidence in Other Races by Stage, Utah vs. US*, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Localized84.6%
Regional15.4%
Distant0.0% Unstaged
0.0%
Utah
Localized86.3%
Regional6.3%
Distant2.5%
Unstaged5.0%
US
![Page 74: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Wrap Up
• Future reports
• Comments
• Questions
![Page 75: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Data Acquisition, Utilization, and Management Team Members
• Meghan Balough
• Banning Leonard
• Kathie Marti
• Antoinette Stroup
• Shelly Wagstaff
![Page 76: Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042715/558ba8a7d8b42ae8278b46a0/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Utah Cancer Registry Acknowledgement
• Research was supported by the Utah Cancer Registry, which is funded by Contract No. HHSN261201000026C from the National Cancer Institute's SEER Program with additional support from the Utah State Department of Health and the University of Utah.