Overview of TJ-II experiments
description
Transcript of Overview of TJ-II experiments
Overview of TJ-II experiments
Presented by
Joaquín Sánchez
Laboratorio Nacional de Fusión, EURATOM-CIEMAT, Spain
Institute of Plasma Physics, NSC KIPT, Kharkov, Ukraine
Institute of Nuclear Fusion, RRC Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russia
Associação EURATOM/IST, Centro de Fusão Nuclear, Lisboa, Portugal
General Physics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
A.F. Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute, St.Petersburg, Russia
ORNL, US
PPPL, US
Carlos III University, Spain
Univ Politecnica de Cayalunya, Spain
221st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
TJ-II Flexible Heliac
VF coils
TF coils
Vacuum vessel
Central conductor
Plasma
4.6 m
321st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
Neutral Beam Line
Neutral Beam Line
Heavy Ion Beam
High Resolution Scattering ThomsonTJ-II
B (0) ≤ 1.2 T, R (0) = 1.5 m, <a> ≤ 0.22 m0.9 ≤ ≤ 2.2 ECR and NBI heating
421st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
TJ-II goals
• Stellarator physicsprogress in the development of a disruption free, high density, steady state reactor based on the stellarator concept.
• Basic fusion physics, relevant also to tokamaks & ITER.
521st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
• Confinement, electric fields and transport
• Momentum transport
• Plasma – wall
• Conclusions
Overview
621st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
• Confinement, electric fields and transport
• Momentum transport
• Plasma – wall
• Conclusions
721st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
Global confinement and heat diffusion
Nr. shots a P n
TJ-II (ECH) 762 1.990.07 -0.620.02 1.060.02 0.350.04ISS04 1721 2.280.02 -0.610.01 0.540.01 0.410.01
Diffusivities range from 1 to 10 m2/s. e decreases with line density and iota in agreement with global confinement studies. (V. I. Vargas et al., EPS-2006)
E. Ascasíbar et al., Nucl. Fusion 45, 276 (2005)
0
1
2
3
4
5
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
n e (10
19m
-3)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1T
e (ke
V)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
Ti (
eV)
Ne profiles show a gradual evolution from the hollow shape typical of ECH plasmas (on-axis) to bell-shaped profiles at the NBI phase (400 kW).
E aa nn PP
ne Te Ti
International Stellarator Confinement Data BaseA. Dinklage et al., IAEA EX/P7-1 (Friday)
821st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
Plasma potential profiles
-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
, V
ne1013cm-3
0.3 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.95 1.15 1.5 1.8 2.3 3.0
#15585
• Measurements of plasma potential show the evolution of the electric field from positive at ECH plasmas to negative at the NBI regime.
The smooth change from positive to negative electric field observed in the core region as density is raised is correlated with global and local transport results, showing a confinement time improvement and a reduction of electron transport.
A. Melnikov et al., EX/P7-3 Friday
0
1
2
3
4
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
#15569#15577#15582#15584#15585
n e (10
19m
-3)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
Te (
keV
)
ne Te
p
Off-axis ECH + NBI
921st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
Plasma potential profiles
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9
<f>
(kH
z)
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.9
<ne>
In addition to edge shear layer (measured by probes) Doppler Reflectometry sees a second, deeper, shear layer which moves inwards as central density rises
T. Estrada et al. Nuclear Fusion 46 (2006) S792
1021st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
Probabilistic Transport Models
• Based on Continuous Time Random Walk / Master Equation• Avoids assumption of locality• Mathematically sound approach to modelling of critical gradient• Earlier work showed:
• Power degradation• Stiffness / anomalous scaling with system size• Fast transport• etc.
• Now, studied effect of perturbations• Pulse propagation:
• Sign reversal (due to flux accumulation)• “Ballistic” and “instantaneous” propagation
Ballistic Instantaneous
B. van Milligen et al., TH/P2-17 (today)
tim
e
tim
e
1121st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
Confinement and magnetic topology
Due to a rarefaction of resonant surfaces in the proximity of low order rationals which is expected to decrease turbulent transport
Due to the triggering of ExB sheared flows in the proximity of rationals
TJ-IIrole of different low order rationals
(3/2 vs 4/2, 5/3…)
Why do rationals trigger ITBs?: an open issue
1221st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
Core Transitions : role of low order rationals
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Te (k
eV)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
n e (10
19m
-3)
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
1040 1080 1120 1160 1200 1240
I p (kA
)
time (ms)
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
100_60_69 + OH
vacuum1080 ms1140 ms1170 ms
5/3
3/2
4/3
Te
ne
Ip
Te
ne
Ip
•Positioning a low order rational (e.g. 3/2, 4/2, 4/3) near the core triggers controllably CERC (use, e. g., induced OH current or ECCD). But so far no CERC triggered by 5/3.
T. Estrada et al., PPCF 2005 /
FST 2006
5/3 3/2 4/3
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
1.25 1.26 1.27 1.28 1.29 1.3 1.31 1.32
CERCno CERC
Er (
kV/m
)
R (m)0.3 -0.3
International Stellarator Profile Data Base
Yokoyama et al , EX5-3 Thursday
1321st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
Core transitions triggered by 4/2 rational
0 1Effective radius
SXR profiles
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
<n e>
(10
19m
-3) a)
H (a.u.)
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
0
20
40
60
80
100
Te (k
eV) T
i (eV)
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1000 1050 1100 1150 1200
I p (kA
)
time (ms)
1.9
2
2.1
2.2
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
vacuum1050 ms1100 ms1150 ms
/2
Difference between the SXR reconstructions before and during CERCTe
Ti
ne
Ip
• CERC triggered by the n=4/m=2 rational has been studied in TJ-II ECH plasmas.• Changes in both Te and Ti.
• The SXR tomography diagnostic shows a flattening of the profiles localized around ≈ 0.4 with a m=2 poloidal structure. The rational must be inside the plasma to trigger the transition.
T. Estrada et al.EX/P7-6 Friday
1421st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
• Confinement, electric fields and transport
• Momentum transport
• Plasma – wall
• Conclusions
1521st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
Momentum transport: plasma core
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
-800
-400
0
400
800
(V
)
ne (1019m-3) 0.41 ECRH 0.75 ECRH 1.90 NBI
#13542
•change of sign of the poloidal rotation direction I• depends abruptly on plasma density.
• In low-density plasmas the poloidal direction
corresponds to a positive radial electric field, at
higher densities negative radial electric fields are
deduced from the measured poloidal rotation.
•Results consistent with HIBP measurements• qualitative agreement with neoclassical theory
calculations that predict that the change of sign of
the radial electric field is mainly due to a change in
the ratio of the electron to ion temperature
B. Zurro et al., FST-2006
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
Vpol (
km/s
)
ne [10
19 m
-3]
Er > 0
Er < 0
1621st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
Momentum transport: plasma edge
Field lines
Poloidal limiter
View plane
View coneM.A. Pedrosa et al., EX/P4-40 ThursdayC. Hidalgo et al., EX/P7-2 Friday
•The development of the naturally occurring velocity shear layer requires a minimum plasma density.There is a coupling between the onset of sheared flow development and the level of turbulence (M.A. Pedrosa et al., PPCF-2005).
•Sheared flows can be developed in a time scale of tens of microseconds (A. Alonso et al., PPCF-2006)
3500
4500
5500
6500
Erm
s/B
(m
/s)
-2000
0
2000
0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1
v per
p (m
/s)
Line Average Density (x1019 m-3)
-80
-40
0
40
0.85 0.9 0.95 1 1.05
Floa
ting
Pot
enti
al (
V)
r/a
Increasing Density
M1
M3
M2
1721st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
Phase transition model and edge transitions
˜ n k n0
2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2
DataModel
Is /I
s|c
E/E
c
-0.6
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2
Data
Model
V'
Is /I
s|c
B.A. Carreras et al., Phys of Plasmas (2006)
• The emergence in TJ-II of the plasma edge shear flow layer as density increases can be described by a simple transition model.
• The mechanism used in the model is the resistive pressure driven turbulence.
• This model gives power dependence on density gradients before and after the transition consistent with experiment.
Instability drive
Nonlinear damping
Shear flow stabilization
Viscous dampingReynolds stress
E
N2/ 3E N 1/ 2 E2 N 1/3U2 E
N
dEN
U
aN1/ 3UE bU
Coupled nonlinear envelope equations for the fluctuation level and shear flow
E ( ˜ n / n)2 1/ 2
N (dp / dr) / ( p / a)
U V / r
TJ-II data
1821st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
Energy transfer between global (parallel) flows and turbulence
ENERGY(DC flows)
ENERGYturbulence
EnergyTransfer
B. Gonçalves et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 145001.
First measurements of the production term (P) in the TJ-II stellarator show the importance of 3-D physics in the development of perpendicular sheared flows and the development of significant parallel turbulent forces.
C. Hidalgo et al., EX/P7-2 Friday
r
VP r
II
II
1921st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
Biasing experiments: electric field damping and transport
•The ratio ne/ H (which is roughly proportional to the particle
confinement time p) increases substantially (~100%) during
biasing.
•Flows decay after biasing in about 30 s: similar results have been found in other stellarator (HSX) and tokamaks (CASTOR)
M.A. Pedrosa et al., EX/P4-40 Thursday
10
20
30
40
50
0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
(s)
ne (1019 m-3)
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
Floa
ting
Pot
enti
al (
V)
Time (ms)
# ne 0.5 x 10 19 m-3 13 s
# ne 0.7 x 10 19 m-3 40 s
# ne 0.9 x 10 19 m-3 20 s
2021st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
• Confinement, electric fields and transport
• Momentum transport
• Plasma – wall
• Conclusions
2121st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
Plasma Wall Interaction Studies in TJ-II
0 1m
HeTurbopumps
Observationoptics
He beam
pulsed valve & skimmer
=85,3°
Manometer
PLASMA
VACUUMVESSEL
LASER
Vacuum chamber 1
Vacuum chamber 2
Comparison with reflectrometry, Li beam and TS--> density profile
Comparison with ECE Langmuir probes and TS--> temperture profile- Self consistency: reproduction of full emission radial profile
emiss.(nm) 667 706 728
Relative line intensity (A.U.)
Validation of the C-R model for He in a supersonic He beam
0
200
400
600
800
-0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8
ThomsonECEHaz de He
Te(e
V)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
13574
Sonda de LangmuirThomsonHaz de He
T e(e
V)
0
2 1012
4 1012
6 1012
8 1012
1 1013
1,2 1013
-1 -0,5 0 0,5 1
#5743
ThomsonreflectómetroHaz de He
n e(cm
-3)
0
2 1012
4 1012
6 1012
8 1012
1 1013
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
#13574
Haz de Li
Haz de HeThomson
n e(cm
-3)
ne neTe
0
2 1012
4 1012
6 1012
8 1012
1 1013
1.2 1013
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
#6296
ThomsonreflectómetroHaz He
n e(cm
-3)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
#6296
Haz de HeECEThomson
Te(e
V)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1
#13567
I667expI706expI728exp
I667simulatedI728simulatedI706simulated
I(a.
u.)
0
2 1012
4 1012
6 1012
8 1012
1 1013
1.2 1013
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1
#13567
ne
Te
n e(c
m-3) T
e(eV
)
2221st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
Plasma Wall Interaction Studies in TJ-II
Effects of limiter insertion in the plasmas depending on hydrocarbon deposition. Limiter C, contaminated. Limiter A, clean
0
1
2
3H C3/neH A3/ne Isat /ne (Lim.A)
Limiter C in (A Out)
Z< 2.5 cmLimiter A in (C out)Z< 2.5 cm
Erosion / transport of C
Source of C: bulk graphite or pre-deposited CxHy films ?
Experiment: limiter insertion (shot by shot)
Limiter C: graphite contaminated with ethylene (regenerated every shot)
Limiter A: clean graphite
• Recycling (H) similar
•C influx, mainly from contaminated limiter
Contaminated
Clean
0
30
60
CV/ne Te (eV)
135601356513570 135751358013585
0.4
0.8
shot number
2321st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
Tritium Inventory Control Through Chemical Reactions
Cold plasma experiment + new diagnostic (Cryo-trapping assisted mass spectroscopy)
C deposition can be inhibited by N2 injectionDemonstrated Asdex Up + Laboratory experiments Mechanism?
Chemical sputtering of deposited film -> HCN (doubts for ITER, needs energetic ions , E>50 ev)
Film precursor recombination prevents deposition -> C2Hx (would work at room temp energies )
H2/N2 plasmas. Chem. Sputtering HCN/C2 Hc’s=3
H2/N2/CH4 plasmas. Scavengers HCN/C2 Hc’s=0.1
C2H2
HCN
HCNC2H2
Pre-deposited film+ N2 Plasma
Pre-deposited film+ N2 /Methane Plasma
Tabarés et al. EX/P4-26 Thursday
2421st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
Near term plans for TJ-II
Lithium deposition
evaporation +Ne GD Plasma 4 ovens, 1g/each. Symmetric
Route to high ne high operation> 1.6 MW NBI by early 2007
2521st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
• Confinement, electric fields and transport
• Momentum transport
• Plasma – wall
• Conclusions
2621st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu 2006
Conclusions
The investigation of plasma potential profiles reveals a direct link between electric fields, density and plasma confinement. Statistical description of transport is emerging as a new way to describe the coupling between profiles, plasma flows and turbulence.
TJ-II experiments clearly show that the location of rational surfaces inside the plasma can provide a trigger for core transitions. These findings provide critical test for different models proposed to explain the appearance of CERCs linked to magnetic topology.
In the plasma core, perpendicular rotation is strongly coupled to plasma density, showing a reversal consistent with neoclassical expectations. Contrarily, spontaneous sheared flows appear to be strongly coupled to plasma turbulence in the plasma edge, consistent with theoretical models for turbulence-driven flows.
Carbon erosion & redeposition studies: - carbon influx from film dominant over bulk graphite release
- scavenger effect dominant over chemical sputtering in N2 puffing experiments .