Overview of the NOAA Satellite Observing Systems ...€¦ · • The NOAA Satellite Observing...
Transcript of Overview of the NOAA Satellite Observing Systems ...€¦ · • The NOAA Satellite Observing...
Satellite and
Information
Service
June 21, 2018
Overview of the NOAA Satellite
Observing Systems Architecture
(NSOSA)
Dr. Karen St. Germain
Director, Office of Systems Architecture and Advanced Planning
NSOSA Community Day
Department of Commerce // National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration // 2
Why Observing Capabilities Matter
• NESDIS helps to keep our public safe and our economy strong
• NESDIS’ 24x7 satellite data and products:
• Reduce extreme weather impacts through enhanced prediction capabilities, and by providing actionable and timely weather data
• Improve space weather readiness to lessen vulnerability of power suppliers, telecommunications banking and transportations systems
• Feed model predictions to maximize agricultural returns, savings for the energy sector and efficiency in the transportation industry
Department of Commerce // National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration // 3
GOES-E
3rd Gen.
(USA)
75° W
GOES-W
3rd Gen.
(USA)
135° W
METEOSAT
3rd Gen.
(EUMETSAT)
0°
METEOSAT-IO
(EUMETSAT)
57.5° E
GEO-
KOMPSAT
(SOUTH
KOREA)
128° E
HIMAWARI
(JAPAN)
140° E
JASON
SENTINEL JPSS-1/-2
GOES-
Spare
3rd Gen.
(USA)
105° W
Today’s Generation of Observational Capability
EPS-SG-A
EPS-SG-B
SWFO – L1
Radarsat
GNSS-RO
Department of Commerce // National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration // 4
Planning for the Future
• Evolving to a more mission-effective, integrated, adaptable, and affordable portfolio while responding to changing technology, emerging partnerships and evolving observation requirements
• Why start now?
• 10-15+ year development timeline for space assets
• Current constellation (GOES-R/S/T/U and JPSS-1/2/3/4) fly-outs 2026-2035
• The NOAA Satellite Observing Systems Architecture (NSOSA) study is examining NOAA’s future space segment architecture decisions
GOES-R – Nov. 2016 JPSS – Nov. 2017 GOES-S – March 2018
Future partner contributions assumed, including Sentinel, Himawari, Radarsat, MTG
GOES-R – Nov. 2016 JPSS – Nov. 2017
2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
POR 2025
NSOSA Scope GOES
JPSS
COSMIC-2
DSCOVR/SWFO
Sounding (mW, IR, RO), Real Time Imaging, Ozone, Clouds, Winds, Space Weather
GOES-S Fly-out 2026
Department of Commerce // National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration // 5
NSOSA Study – Informing Future Investments
• The NSOSA study is a pre-decisional analytic process to inform NOAA’s future space segment architecture decisions
• Which observation functions should be allocated to which orbits?
• Should we retain the legacy architecture or seek major change?
• Which observation functions should be improved?
• End-user requirements driven by NOAA operational needs
• Leveraging commercial, public and academia for innovative solutions
NASA GSFC, JPL, and KSC
Aerospace JHU APL
MIT-LL NOAA NESDIS, NWS, NOS, NMFS, and OAR
UCAR
Department of Commerce // National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration // 6
NSOSA Study – Strategic Objectives
COMPATIBILITY WITH FIXED BUDGETS
PROGRAMMATIC FLEXIBILITY AND ADAPTABILITY
DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIPS
LOW RISK AT CONSTELLATION LEVEL
AVAILABILITY OF ALL CAPABILITIES Ensures moderate availability for broader scope of NOAA observations and services
Favors architectures that are compatible with stable
top-line funding
AVAILABILITY OF CORE CAPABILITIES Ensures the highest availability
for mission critical observations and services
Favors architectures that can be responsive to change
Encourages exploitation of available partner data to meet mission needs
Allows tolerance for risk associated with new business models and new technology while maintaining reliability
Department of Commerce // National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration // 7
NSOSA Study – Observational Objectives
•3-D Winds
•Real Time (RT) regional weather imagery
•Global GNSS-RO soundings
•Global RT imagery
•Global Near RT microwave (MW) soundings
•Global Near RT infrared (IR) soundings
•Global ocean surface vector winds
•Non-RT global weather imagery
•Global ocean color/phytoplankton composition
•Microwave imagery
•Lightning
•Radar-based global precipitation rates
•Regional MW soundings
•Regional IR soundings
•Global sea surface height
•Global chemical concentration
•Ozone
•Outgoing Long Wave Radiation (NASA Mission)
• Incoming solar radiation (NASA Mission)
TERRESTRIAL/OCEAN OBJECTIVES
•Coronograph imagery: Off Sun-Earth line
•Coronograph imagery: Sun-Earth line
•Photospheric magnetogram imagery: Off Sun-Earth line
•Heliospheric images
•Auroral imaging
•Thermospheric O/N2 ratio (height integrated)
•Upper thermospheric density
• Ionospheric electron density profiles
• Ionospheric Drift Velocity
• Interplanetary Solar wind: Off Sun-Earth line
•Photospheric magnetogram imagery: Sun-Earth line
•Solar X-ray irradiance
•Solar EUV imaging
•Solar EUV irradiance
• Interplanetary Solar wind: Sun-Earth line
• Interplanetary energetic particles
•Geospace energetic Particles
•Geomagnetic field
• Interplanetary magnetic field
SPACE WEATHER OBJECTIVES
• Value model was driven by 38 observation requirements that encompass NOAA’s operational needs for the 2030-2050 epoch
Department of Commerce // National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration // 8
NSOSA Study Informs Decision Making
Operational
Considerations
(NOAA/DoD/
Partners)
Strategic
Priorities
Technology
Opportunities
Policies &
Standards
NOAA User Prioritized Requirements
National Weather Service
National Marine Fisheries Service
National Ocean Service
Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research
NSOSA Analysis
Commercial Data/Services
NOAA Ground
Pre-Phase A
Partner Sources Program(s) of
Record
Source Agnostic Data/Products
Department of Commerce // National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration // 9
NSOSA Study Architecture Analysis
Develop Constellation
Concepts Score Against
Requirements and Strategic Priorities
Model Costs
Observational Objectives
Strategic Objectives
Available Technology
Inform and Refine
Cost/Benefit
Relative Cost P
erf
orm
ance
Sco
re
• Considers future observing capabilities, partner observations, user requirements, instrument technologies, and commercial interests
• Provides discriminating choices and opportunities about the next generation, and establishes a robust analytic capability to evaluate and iterate opportunities
Department of Commerce // National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration // 10
Evidence-Based Decision Making Tool
The value difference between
constellations 65 and 86 provides an
example of additional capabilities
possible at the same cost
Legacy Continuation Hybrid
3D winds
Real Time Imagery
Near-Space Atmospheric
Measurements
Rel
ativ
e P
erfo
rman
ce S
core
60 Series – “Legacy Continuation” (Comprehensive US Govt satellites)
80 Series – “Hybrid” (Mix of disaggregated US Govt satellites and hosted payloads and services)
Department of Commerce // National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration // 11
Example Hybrid Architecture
• GEO is mixed US Gov. satellites and hosted payloads
• LEO systems are partially disaggregated
• Mixed resolution payloads, update rates
• Commercial Services and GNSS-RO Data Buys
Hosted
Imager
East
Hosted
Imager
West
GEO-
KOMPSAT
(SOUTH
KOREA)
128° E
HIMAWARI
(JAPAN)
140° E
JASON
SENTINEL
Sounder 1330
US Gov
Center GEO
“SuperGOES” EPS-SG-A
EPS-SG-B
Comprehensive
SWX – L1
Radarsat
Sounder 0530
MTG-I
(EUMETSAT)
0°
MTG-S
(EUMETSAT)
Wind LIDAR
Tundra
Tundra
Hosted
Instrument of
Opportunity
Comprehensive
SWX – L5
Department of Commerce // National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration // 12
Hybrid Architecture Opportunities
• Different mix of observations with higher mission impact than strict legacy
• Quality and quantity of soundings (IR, MW, and GNSS-RO)
• Enhanced imagery and high-latitude coverage
• Operational space weather measurements
• New types of data needed by models
• More agility
• Adjust to changing technology, needs, and opportunities
• Increased use of and reliance on partner contributed observations
• Disaggregate and balance risk
• New business models
• Hosting of instruments
• Data purchase
• Ride shares
• Instruments of opportunity
EXAMPLES OF HIGH VALUE TRADES AND DEMOS • Transition to hosting payloads • Legacy vs new measurements • Space weather collected differently • Cross-grade imagers • New NOAA LEO orbits (0530, crossing) • Secure ingest of external data
Department of Commerce // National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration // 13
Ongoing Community Engagement
• Public comment on NSOSA Study draft report
• NOAA is seeking comments via the Federal Register
• Community Day to discuss the study and answer questions
• Commercial Observations RFI
• Will support CWDP Round 3 and other NOAA observation requirements
• Released May 21, 2018; open for 60 days
• JPSS-2 Rideshare RFI
• Capabilities demonstrations that could rideshare with JPSS-2
• RFIs for other NSOSA-favored capabilities
• To include weather and space weather instruments and payload hosting services under various partnership models
Department of Commerce // National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration // 14
NSOSA Feedback Solicited
• Did NOAA consider a sufficiently broad range of alternatives?
• Are the opportunities that the analysis identified as deserving of consideration consistent with your knowledge of the state of the space enterprise?
• Are there outcomes or options that you recommend for further analysis?
• What suggestions do you have on how NOAA can better engage with industry, including approaches for developing innovative capabilities, new partnership opportunities and business models that may inform NOAA’s path forward?
• What suggestions do you have on how we can engage with the academic and research community and other stakeholders to ensure NOAA makes the best use of the outputs of this study?