Overview of and current indications for the use of immune...
Transcript of Overview of and current indications for the use of immune...
Overview of and current indications for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in urothelial carcinoma
Jonathan Rosenberg, MDAssociate Attending PhysicianSection Head, Non-prostate Genitourinary MalignanciesGenitourinary Oncology ServiceMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Disclosures
AdvisoryCommittee
Astellas PharmaGlobalDevelopmentInc,AstraZenecaPharmaceuticalsLP,BayerHealthCarePharmaceuticals,Bristol-MyersSquibbCompany,EMDSerono Inc,GenentechBioOncology,InovioPharmaceuticalsInc,GritstoneOncology,Lilly,Merck,RocheLaboratoriesInc,SanofiGenzyme
ContractedResearch GenentechBioOncology,Incyte Corporation,Novartis
Current FDA approvals for bladder cancer
Agent Indication NOverall ResponseRate
(%)DOR(mos)
OverallSurvival(mos) Randomized
Atezolizumab 1st-linecis-ineligible
Priorplatinum
310
119
14.8%(11.1,19.3)
23.5%(16.0,31.0)
NR
NR
7.9(6.7,9.3)1
15.9(10.4,NR)2
No
No
Nivolumab Priorplatinum 270 19.6%(15.1,24.9)
NR 8.7(6, NR)3
No
Durvalumab Priorplatinum 182 17.0%(11.9,23.3)
NR Notreported
No
Avelumab Priorplatinum 242 16.1%(≥6mos follow-up)
Notestimable
Notreported
No
1. Rosenberg,etal.Lancet 20162. Balar,etal.Lancet 20173. Sharma,etal.LancetOncology20174. Avelumab packageinsert
NR:NotReached
Atezolizumab approved for prior platinum-treated patients
• SinglearmphaseIIstudy
• 310patients• Priorplatinum-
basedchemoformetastaticdiseaseorrelapsewithin12monthsofperiopchemotherapy
• 40%had2ormorepriorregimens
• ORR14.8%• MedianOS7.9mos• Modesttoxicity
Rosenberg,etal.TheLancet2016
Update on Phase III study of atezolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced bladder cancer
May 9, 2017The Phase III IMvigor211 study that evaluated atezolizumab in people with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer whose disease progressed during or after treatment with a platinum-based chemotherapy (previously treated) did not meet its primary endpoint of overall survival compared to chemotherapy. The safety profile observed in IMvigor211 was consistent with what has been previously observed for atezolizumab.
https://www.gene.com/media/press-releases/14665/2017-05-09/genentech-provides-update-on-phase-iii-s
Atezolizumab:cisplatin-unfit(n=119)
IC1(n = 48)
IC0(n = 39)
21% (10, 35) 21% (9, 36)
8% 8%
13% 13%
IC2/3(n = 32)
IC1/2/3(n = 80)
All Patients(N = 119)
ORRa (95% CI) 28% (14, 47) 24% (15, 35) 23% (16, 31)
CR 12% 10% 9%
PR 16% 14% 14%
BalarAVetal.Lancet 2016
Mediandurationofresponsenotreached
USFDAapprovedApril2017
Checkmate 275: Activity of nivolumab in previously platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic UC
Outcome,% AllN=265
ConfirmedORR 19.6
95%CI 15.0–24.9
Bestoverallresponse
Completeresponse 2.3
Partialresponse 17.4
Stabledisease 22.6
Progressivedisease 39.2
Unabletodetermine 18.5
PD-L1<1%n=143
PD-L1≥1%n=122
PD-L1≥5%n=81
16.1 23.8 28.4
10.5–23.1 16.5–32.3 18.9–39.5
<1 4.1 4.9
15.4 19.7 23.5
17.5 28.7 28.4
46.9 30.3 25.9
19.6 17.2 17.3
• PD-L1measuredontumorcells• Medianfollow-upwas7months(minimumof6months)
Sharma,etal.LancetOncology2017
Nivolumab 2nd-line: Overall survival
Alltreatedpatients
No.atRisk
AlltreatedpatientsPD-L1<1%
PD-L1≥1%
PD-L1≥1%
MedianOS,Months(95%CI)a
Alltreated 8.74(6.05-NR)
PD-L1<1% 5.95(4.30-8.08)PD-L1≥1% 11.30(8.74-NR)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0 3 6 9 12 15
OverallSurvival(P
roba
bility)
Months
PD-L1<1%
265 198 148 63 5 0143 101 69 26 2 0122 97 79 37 3 0
Galskyetal.ESMO2016
Sharma,etal.LancetOncology2017
Durvalumab approved for platinum-treated advanced UC
• Single-arm Phase I/II Study 1108
• 182 pts • Previously
treated UC w/ platinum-based chemo or relapse ≤1 y of (neo)adjuvant chemo
Allpatients(n=182)
PD-L1high(n=95)
PD-L1 low(n=73)
PD-L1unknown(n=14)
ORRbyblindedreview
31(17.0%) 25(26.3%) 3(4.1%) 3(21.4%)
CR 5(2.7%) 3(3.16%) 1(1.4%) 1(7.1%)PR 26(14.3%) 22(23.16%) 2(2.7%) 2(14.3%)
MedianDoR Notreached Notreached 12.3mo Notreached
Medianfollow-up=5.6mo
VENTANA(SP263)assayapprovedascomplementarydiagnostictest
PressRelease:May01,2017
Avelumab approved for platinum-treated advanced UC
• Single-arm JAVELIN Phase I study
• 242 pts • Previously
treated UC with platinum-based chemo or relapse ≤1 y of (neo)adjuvant chemo
Response Follow-up of≥13weeks(n=226)
Follow-up of≥6months(n=161)
ConfirmedORR 30(13.3%) 26(16.1%)CR 9(4%) 9(5.6%)PR 21(9.3%) 17(10.6%)
MedianDoR Not reached Notreached
Infusion-relatedreactionswerenotedin>20%ofpts,requiringpremedications(antihistaminesandacetaminophen)
AdverseEvents(AEs) N=242DeathsduetoAEs 6%OccurrenceofseriousAEs 41%
PressRelease:May09,2017
KEYNOTE045– Pembrolizumabimprovesoverallsurvivalvs.salvagechemotherapy
• Dealers choice chemotherapy– Docetaxel, paclitaxel, or
vinflunine
• Median OS 10.3 months for pembro vs. 7.4 for chemo (HR 0.73)
• PFS short, and not different between the two arms
Bellmunt Jetal.NEJM2017;376(11):1015-26.
OverallSurvival:PD-L1CombinedPositiveScore≥10%
Datacutoffdate:Sep7,2016.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 240102030405060708090
100
Time,months
OS,
%
74 60 51 42 35 31 18 12 7 3 0 0 090 76 51 36 28 24 16 8 4 1 0 0 0
No.atrisk
Events,n HR(95%CI) PPembro 44 0.57(0.37-0.88) 0.0048Chemo 60
39.8%26.9%
Median(95%CI)8.0mo(5.0-12.3)5.2mo(4.0-7.4)
Bellmunt,etal.SITC2016
PD-L1statusisnegativeprognosticfactor,butpredictsbetterhazardratio
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40O
RR
, % (9
5% C
I)
ConfirmedObjectiveResponseRate
21.1%
11.4%
Δ9.6%P =0.0011 PR
CR
TotalPopulation
21.6%
6.7%
CPS≥10%Population
7.0%
14.1%3.3%8.1%
6.8%
14.9%
2.2%4.4%
Pembrolizumab(N=270)
Chemotherapy(N=272)
Pembrolizumab(N=74)
Chemotherapy(N=90)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
OR
R, %
(95%
CI)
CPS=combinedpositivescore
BellmuntJetal.,SITC2016
CheckMate 032: Ongoing Phase I/II trial of nivolumab+/- ipilimumab in advanced urothelial carcinoma
Primary endpoint: Objective response rate (ORR)
Sharma P et al. Proc ASCO 2016;Abstract 4501.
Nivolumab3 mg/kg IV Q2W
(N = 78)
Patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Nivolumab 1 mg/kg +ipilimumab 3 mg/kg
IV Q3W for four cycles
(N = 26)
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg +ipilimumab 1 mg/kg
IV Q3W for four cycles
(N = 105)
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W
CheckMate 032: Response and survival
Sharma P et al. SITC 2016;Abstract 03.
Outcome
Nivo1mg/kg+Ipi 3mg/kg(n=26)
Nivo3mg/kg+Ipi 1mg/kg(n=104)
Diseasecontrolrate 57.7% 51%
ORR 38.5% 26%
CR 3.8% 2.9%
MedianPFS 4.3mo 2.6mo
MedianOS 10.2mo 7.3mo
CheckMate 032: Adverse events
Sharma P et al. SITC 2016;Abstract 03.
Grade≥3
Nivo 1mg/kg+Ipi 3mg/kg(n=26)
Nivo 3mg/kg+Ipi 1mg/kg(n=104)
All 30.8% 31.7%
Diarrhea 7.7% 4.8%
Pneumonitis 3.8% <1%
IncreasedALT NR 5.8%
IncreasedAST NR 3.8%
Colitis NR 3.8%
NR = not reported
PowlesTetal.ProcASCO2016;AbstractTPS4574.
Primaryendpoint:Progression-freesurvival
Durvalumab+tremelimumabn=175
Standardchemotherapyn=175
N=525
R
1:1:1
Durvalumabmonotherapyn=175
Treatment-naïve,unresectableStageIVUBC
DANUBE: Phase III trial of first-line durvalumab±tremelimumab in unresectable metastatic urothelial bladder cancer
www.clinicaltrials.gov (Accessed May 2017).
Ongoing Phase III Trials of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Combinations in Urothelial Cancer
Trialname Phase N Treatment
NCT02516241 III 1,005
• Durvalumab
• Durvalumab+tremelimumab
• SOC chemotherapy
CheckMate901
(NCT03036098)III 690
• Nivolumab +ipilimumab
• SOCchemotherapy
SOC = standard of care
Current Status of Systemic Therapy for Bladder Cancer
Muscleinvasive Metastaticpriorchemotherapy
Metastaticpriorimmunotherapy
PembrolizumabClinicaltrialswithnovelapproaches
Maintenance:Avelumab
Metastaticchemotherapy
naive
AtezolizumabNivolumabDurvalumabAvelumab
Platinum-basedorsingle-agentchemotherapyAtezolizumab
TaxanesVinfluninePemetrexed
Perioperativecisplatin-basedchemotherapy
Cisplatinineligible:PembrolizumabDurvalumab
Cisplatineligible:Durvalumab±TremelimumabNivolumab+ipilimumabAtezolizumab
Adjuvant:PembrolizumabAtezolizumabNivolumab
• 4 agents approved for locally advanced or metastatic patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy
– Nivolumab (anti-PD1)– Atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1)– Durvalumab (anti-PD-L1)
– Avelumab (anti-PD-L1)• 1 agent approved for cisplatin-ineligible first-line therapy
– Atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1)
• Responses often occur quickly and are frequently durable• Only a minority of patients respond, and new approaches are
warranted.
Immune checkpoint blockade in urothelial carcinoma