OUTPUT 5 2nd Submission

download OUTPUT 5 2nd Submission

of 5

Transcript of OUTPUT 5 2nd Submission

  • 8/4/2019 OUTPUT 5 2nd Submission

    1/5

    DE LA SALLE HEALTH SCIENCES INSTITUTE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE

    DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY MEDICINE

    CM2 SY 2011-2012

    REVISED OUTPUT 5: SAMPLE SIZE

    SUBMITTED ON:

    SEPTEMBER 13, 2011

    SUBMITTED TO:

    DR. JOVILIA M. ABONG

    SUBMITTED BY:

    GROUP 1A

    ARCAIRA, JOSHUA A.

    ABAD, RAINA

    ANCHETA, JONATHAN B.

    BASUL, CHARINE

    CARAVEO, JULIEN NICOLE

    CRUZ, SPICA

    ESPINOZA, FAITH KRISTINE

    GARCIA, RAY WILSON

    KALALO, GERARD MICHAEL

  • 8/4/2019 OUTPUT 5 2nd Submission

    2/5

    OUTPUT 5: SAMPLE SIZE

    I. Group 1A, Dr. Jovilia M. Abong

    II. Research Question: Among second year high school students with allergic rhinitis of selected schools

    in Dasmarias, Cavite, will exposure to air-conditioned school rooms affect the severity of their

    allergic rhinitis?

    General Objective: To determine if the exposure to the air-conditioning system affects the severity

    of allergic rhinitis in second year high school students of selected schools in Dasmarias, Cavite.

    Specific Objectives:

    1. To identify the prevalence of allergic rhinitis among second year high school students of

    selected schools in of Dasmarias, Cavite based on their exposure to air-conditioned rooms.

    2. To identify the prevalence of allergic rhinitis among second year high school students of

    selected schools in Dasmarias, Cavite based on their exposure to non-air-conditioned

    classrooms.3. To determine the severity of allergic rhinitis according to ARIA classifications.

    4. To identify the risk factors of allergic rhinitis present in the classroom or school, such as the

    presence of pollen, molds, and cockroaches.

    5. Compare the severity of allergic rhinitis in students who are exposed to air-conditioned

    classrooms and those who are not exposed to air-conditioned classrooms.

    III. Research Design: Cross-Sectional Study

    IV. Definition of variables used in the calculations

    1. p1The p1 variable is the estimate of the sample population for the high school students who

    study in air-conditioned classrooms that have mild allergic rhinitis.

    2. p2The p2 variable is the estimate of the sample population for the high school students who

    study in non-air-conditioned classrooms that have mild allergic rhinitis.

    3. AlphaAlpha is the probability of committing a type I error, which means rejecting the null hypothesis

    when in fact the null hypothesis is true. In the study, this is when results show that there is no

    association between exposure to air-conditioning system and alleviation of severity of AR when

    in fact there is.

    4. BetaBeta is the probability of committing a type II error, which means retaining the null hypothesis

    when the null is false. In the study, this is when we fail to reject the null hypothesis even if there

    is sufficient evidence to state otherwise.

  • 8/4/2019 OUTPUT 5 2nd Submission

    3/5

    5. Direction of TestThe study is a one tailed test because we are leaning towards the result of which air-conditioning

    helps in alleviating the severity of AR.

    V. Values

    1. p1 = 30.72. p2 = 13.43. alpha = 0.954. beta = .80

    The p1 and p2 values were based on the following study:

    Mendell, M.J. & Smith, A.H. (1990). Consistent Pattern of Elevated Symptoms in Airconditioned Office

    Buildings: A Reanalysis of Epidemiologic Studies.American Journal of Public Health. (80) 10.

    VI. Sample Size

  • 8/4/2019 OUTPUT 5 2nd Submission

    4/5

  • 8/4/2019 OUTPUT 5 2nd Submission

    5/5

    APPENDIX

    Excerpt from the study in which the values were obtained.