Our Evolving Journey with Clinical Decision Support · 2018-02-14 · 5 Helping more people in more...
Transcript of Our Evolving Journey with Clinical Decision Support · 2018-02-14 · 5 Helping more people in more...
1
Our Evolving Journey with Clinical Decision SupportSession 53, March 6, 2018
Connie L. Saltsman, Pharm.D., MBA, CPHIMS; AVP, Clinical Pharmacy Informatics
Risa C. Rahm, Pharm.D., CPHIMS; Director, Clinical Pharmacy Informatics
HCA Healthcare, Nashville, TN
2
Connie L. Saltsman, Pharm.D., MBA, CPHIMS
Risa C. Rahm, Pharm.D., CPHIMS
Have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
Conflict of Interest
3
Agenda• Which CDS Should be Developed
• Project Management-Driven Process
• Monitoring & Metrics
• Clinical Data Warehouses
• Influencing Factors
4
Learning Objectives• Describe a process to evaluate and prioritize potential clinical
decision support (CDS) tools for development
• Discuss the use of cross functional diagrams and project management to best design and develop CDS for minimal disruption to clinicians’ workflow
• Assess various monitoring methods to analyze the outcome and usage of a CDS, including the use of a Clinical Data Warehouse
5
Helping more people in more places
Our hospitals care for
27M+ patients annually
• Admissions – 1,800,000
• Deliveries – 210,000
• ER visits – 7,500,000
• Physician Clinic Visits –
8,000,000
• Surgeries – 1,400,000
170+ Hospitals in the
U.S. and 6 in the U.K.
118 Ambulatory Surgery
Centers
51 Freestanding ERs
241,000 employees
• 79,000 nurses
• 47,000 allied health
professionals
• 37,000 affiliated physicians
• 3,100 employed physicians
& 1,000 practitioners
6
What is the current status of your CDS development process?
(Choose the response which is used most often at your facility/system)
• Not developing at this time
• Based on who yells the loudest or who has most power
• Evaluation with one group only (pharmacy, nursing or providers)
• Evaluation with a multi-disciplinary team
• Evaluation with a structured matrix
7
Alert Fatigue
• Major unintended consequence of the computerization of health care
• Significant patient safety hazard
• Study: CPOE systems generated warnings for 3-6% of all orders entered
Alert Fatigue Patient Safety Primer. AHRQ PSNet.
https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primers/primer/28/alert-fatigue. Last Accessed 12/16/17
8
Which CDS Should Be Developed?
• Who should get the CDS?
• What prioritization should it get?
• Where does it present in the clinicians’ workflow?
• When do you choose to provide evidence-based practice information vs concerns with alert fatigue?
• Why is the CDS being requested?
9
Case Study: Metformin
• Why: Black Box Warning
• What is the prioritization?
• Who should receive the CDS?
10
Prioritization: CDS Matrix
• Variety of factors to consider
• Clinical
• Technical
• Structured format
11
Clinical Factors to Evaluate
• Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA)
• ISMP Error Reduction Strategies: Automation & Computerization
• Usability & Interface Design
• Strategic Placement in Workflow
• Meaningful Use
• Core Measures
• Regulatory Standards: TJC / CMS
• Federal & State Laws
12
Technical Factors to Evaluate
• Developing & Programming Time
• Testing Time
• Deployment
• Maintenance
• Sensitivity & Specificity
13
CDS Matrix
14
Who Gets the CDS?
15
Case Study: Metformin
• Why: Black Box Warning
• Who is involved & workflow:
• Provider: order entry
• Pharmacist: clinical order review and entry/verification
• Nurse: order acknowledgement and administration
• Who should receive the CDS?
16
Design: Who, What & Where
Who should receive the CDS?
What alerts should be provided to the clinician(s)?
Where should the alerts be in the clinician’s workflow?
– Cross functional diagram (swim lanes)
– Multi-disciplinary input
– End-user evaluation prior to development
17
Swim Lanes
18
Who Should Receive the CDS?
A. Provider
B. Pharmacist
C. Nurse
D. A & B
E. A & C
F. All of the Above
19
Who, What & Where: What did we do?
21
Projects Collected CSG Informatics Group Research and Review
IPAB ReviewFeedback
Prioritization
Projects Approved Additional CSGInformatics Group
Research and Review
Requirements, clinical content, enhancements, and background
submitted to IT&S
IT&S Develop RequirementsPeer Review
Mock up
IT&S Developer proposal and project specs estimated
Approval by team to allow project to begin development
CSG / IT&SDevelopment Walkthrough
Demo
Final CSG approval Pilot at voluntary site
Test Enviroment
Live Enviroment
2
1
Materials pushed enterprise wide
Open communication with sites
Project approved for enterprise deployment
New FunctionalityField Request
IPAB SuggestionsIdentified Best Practice
Enhancement
Request for more information Additional approval if major
impact to non-pharmacy professionals
Project Denied IT&S requires research or more information
CSG feedback
Project Denied
Feedback
Education developed
CSG / IT&S Requirements Walkthrough
IT&S DevelopmentQA Testing
Project Management-Driven Process
22
Projects Collected CSG Informatics Group Research and Review
IPAB ReviewFeedback
Prioritization
Projects Approved Additional CSGInformatics Group
Research and Review
Requirements, clinical content, enhancements, and background
submitted to IT&S
IT&S Develop RequirementsPeer Review
Mock up
IT&S Developer proposal and project specs estimated
Approval by team to allow project to begin development
CSG / IT&SDevelopment Walkthrough
Demo
Final CSG approval Pilot at voluntary site
Test Enviroment
Live Enviroment
2
1
Materials pushed enterprise wide
Open communication with sites
Project approved for enterprise deployment
New FunctionalityField Request
IPAB SuggestionsIdentified Best Practice
Enhancement
Request for more information Additional approval if major
impact to non-pharmacy professionals
Project Denied IT&S requires research or more information
CSG feedback
Project Denied
Feedback
Education developed
CSG / IT&S Requirements Walkthrough
IT&S DevelopmentQA Testing
23
Projects Collected CSG Informatics Group Research and Review
IPAB ReviewFeedback
Prioritization
Projects Approved Additional CSGInformatics Group
Research and Review
Requirements, clinical content, enhancements, and background
submitted to IT&S
IT&S Develop RequirementsPeer Review
Mock up
IT&S Developer proposal and project specs estimated
Approval by team to allow project to begin development
CSG / IT&SDevelopment Walkthrough
Demo
Final CSG approval Pilot at voluntary site
Test Enviroment
Live Enviroment
2
1
Materials pushed enterprise wide
Open communication with sites
Project approved for enterprise deployment
New FunctionalityField Request
IPAB SuggestionsIdentified Best Practice
Enhancement
Request for more information Additional approval if major
impact to non-pharmacy professionals
Project Denied IT&S requires research or more information
CSG feedback
Project Denied
Feedback
Education developed
CSG / IT&S Requirements Walkthrough
IT&S DevelopmentQA Testing
24
Projects Collected CSG Informatics Group Research and Review
IPAB ReviewFeedback
Prioritization
Projects Approved Additional CSGInformatics Group
Research and Review
Requirements, clinical content, enhancements, and background
submitted to IT&S
IT&S Develop RequirementsPeer Review
Mock up
IT&S Developer proposal and project specs estimated
Approval by team to allow project to begin development
CSG / IT&SDevelopment Walkthrough
Demo
Final CSG approval Pilot at voluntary site
Test Enviroment
Live Enviroment
2
1
Materials pushed enterprise wide
Open communication with sites
Project approved for enterprise deployment
New FunctionalityField Request
IPAB SuggestionsIdentified Best Practice
Enhancement
Request for more information Additional approval if major
impact to non-pharmacy professionals
Project Denied IT&S requires research or more information
CSG feedback
Project Denied
Feedback
Education developed
CSG / IT&S Requirements Walkthrough
IT&S DevelopmentQA Testing
25
CDS Monitoring - Why?
• Active in the production environment
• Providing useful, pertinent information to the clinician
• Clinical workflow is positively impacted
• Sensitive and specific to the problem at hand
• Future enhancements are identified
• Support current regulations / best practices
• Remove if no longer needed
26
How to Monitor & Measure
• Surveys to clinicians for impact and future enhancements
• Chart reviews
• Enhancement requests from clinicians
• Complaints from clinicians
• Help desk calls
• Reports from EHR
• Clinical Data Warehouse reports
• Dashboards
27
Case Study: Metformin
• Original CDS
• Lesson Learned
• Enhanced CDS
• Regulatory Update & Enhancements
28
Clinical Data Warehouse
• Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW)
• Enterprise Data Warehouse (EDW)
• Data Warehouse (DW)
29
Clinical Data Warehouse• I have a CDW and use it for all of my data analysis needs
• I have a CDW and am just beginning to use it
• I don’t know
• I don’t have one
30
Considerations with CDW & CDS
• Disconnect between clinicians, informaticists and data analysists
• Garbage in = Garbage out
• Mapping
• Dashboard software
• Access
31
Clinical Data Warehouse
Review key informatics projects
for data points
Collect list of data points
Review data points with analysis team
Review data points against current CDW
Request additional data points to be
added to CDW
32
Influencing Factors
Proponents of Success:• Multi-disciplinary
• Constant feedback
• Establishing workflow
• Leadership support
• Project prioritization
• Project management
• New functionalities
Barriers to Success:• Regulatory changes
• Clinical Updates
• Team turnover
• Funding
• System limitations
• Variation from standards
• New functionalities
33
Future
• Data to identify the issues that CDS can fix and help in the prioritization
• Pulling data from the CDW to prompt CDS in the EHR
34
Questions
• Connie Saltsman ([email protected])
• Risa Rahm ([email protected])
• Please don’t forget to complete the online session evaluation