otws2_7351

download otws2_7351

of 29

Transcript of otws2_7351

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    1/29

    Stochastic Maxwell Equations in Photonic CrystalModeling and Simulations

    Hao-Min Zhou

    School of Math, Georgia Institute of Technology

    Joint work with:

    Ali Adibi (ECE), Majid Badiei (ECE), Shui-Nee Chow (Math)

    IPAM, UCLA, April 14-18, 2008

    Partially supported by NSF

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    2/29

    Outline

    Introduction & Motivation

    Direct Method A Stochastic Model

    Wiener Chaos Expansions (WCE) Numerical Method based on WCE

    Simulation results Conclusion

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    3/29

    Introduction & Motivation

    Stochastic PDEs :

    Solutions are no longer deterministic.

    Main interest: statistical properties, suchas mean, variance.

    Multi-scale structures.

    Fluid DynamicsEngineering

    Material Sciences

    Biology

    Finance

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    4/29

    Introduction & Motivation

    ),(),(),( tyytyJtyJ jiji = Spatially incoherent source:

    ),( tyJ j

    ),( tyJ i

    Such as diffuse light in optics.

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    5/29

    Introduction & Motivation

    Applications in sensing

    Raman spectroscopy for bio and environmental sensing

    Photonic Crystal

    spectrometer(in nano-scale)

    Humantissue

    Spatially incoherent

    light

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    6/29

    Photonic Crystal Spectrometer

    IncidentSpatially IncoherentField

    Detectors

    Output A

    Output B

    Output C

    Output D

    Output E

    Output F

    HeterogeneousPhotonic Structure

    SpectrallyDiverseField

    Multiplex multimodal spectrometer

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    7/29

    Introduction & Motivation

    Photonic Crystal (designed) as the medium

    goal: model the incoherent source and simulate output

    First step in the design of Photonic Crystal spectrometers

    Wave propagation is governed by Maxwell equations

    a

    Input Source(incoherent)

    at A

    Output at B(electric field

    intensity)

    ),( tyJ ),( tyE2

    Optimal design of the shapes of Photonic Crystals for largest band gap (Kao-

    Osher-Yablonovitch, 05)

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    8/29

    Maxwell Equation

    Maxwell equations:

    ttt

    = ),(),( rHrE

    ),(),(

    )(),( tt

    tt rJ

    rErrH +

    =

    0= E

    0= H

    t

    t

    t

    tt

    =

    ),(),()(),(

    2

    2rJrE

    rrE

    Helmholtz wave equation:

    electric field

    magnetic field

    Input incoherent source)J(r,t

    )E(r,t)H(r,t

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    9/29

    Helmholtz wave equation

    z-invariant structure implies

    two sets of decoupled equations Transverse Magnetic (TM) (Ez,Hx,Hy)

    Transverse Electric (TE) (Hz,Ex,Ey)

    3D space structure reduces to 2D

    Helmholtz TM wave equation:

    tttyyxx tyxJtyxEyxtyxEtyxE )),,(()),,()(,()),,(()),,(( =+

    PDEs are linear.

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    10/29

    Direct Method for PC Spectrometer

    Incoherent property implies the direct (brute-force) method.

    Input nonzero point source at , and

    Compute output electric field at B

    Total electric intensity at B:

    Why point source? Non-point sources, such as plane waves,lead to coherent outputs.

    Pro: correct physics (linear equations + incoherent outputs).

    Con: very inefficient.

    ),( tyJi

    piy

    ).(,0),( ijtyJ jp =

    2 2( , , ) ( ( , , )) .pB i Bi

    E x y t E x y t=

    ),( tyEpi

    +=ji

    p

    j

    p

    i

    i

    p

    i

    i

    p

    i EEEE,

    22 )()(

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    11/29

    A Stochastic Model

    Spatially incoherent source

    Stochastic model

    More general:

    tttyyxx tyxJtyxEyxtyxEtyxE )),,(()),,()(,()),,(()),,(( =+

    )()(),,( tVyXtyxJ Az =

    ?

    ( )

    =

    2

    0

    0 exp)(sin)(T

    tttttV

    10ax10a Photonic Crystal asthe simulation medium

    a

    ),()( ydWyX = )(yW Brownian Motion.

    ( , , ) ( , , ) ( , , ),tJ x y t f x y t dW x y t=

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    12/29

    Stochastic Helmholtz Wave Equations

    Current density is a stochastic source.

    Solution for electric field is random.

    Monte Carlo simulation is slow, and hard to recover the

    incoherent properties

    Our strategy: WCE.

    tttyyxx tyxJtyxEyxtyxEtyxE )),,(()),,()(,()),,(()),,(( =+

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    13/29

    Monte Carlo

    Traditional methods, Monte Carlo (MC)

    simulations,

    Not many computational methods available.

    Solve the equations realization by realization.

    Each realization, the equations become deterministic and

    solved by classical methods.The solutions are treated as samples to extract statistical

    properties.

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    14/29

    Monte Carlo

    MC can be very expensive:

    Has slow convergence, governed by law of large numbers

    and the convergence is not monotone.( is the number ofMC realizations)

    Need to resolve the fine scales in each realization to obtainthe small scale effects on large scales, while only large scale

    statistics are of interests, such as long time and large scale

    behaviors.

    Hard to estimate errors

    Must involve random number generators, which need to be

    carefully chosen.

    ),1

    (

    n

    O

    n

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    15/29

    Wiener Chaos Expansions

    Goal: Design efficient numerical methods.

    Separate the deterministic properties from

    randomness.

    Has better control on the errors.

    Avoid random number generators, all

    computations are deterministic.

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    16/29

    Wiener Chaos Expansions

    Functions depends on Brownian

    motion

    ),,( dWxtu

    .W

    contains infinitely many independent

    Gaussian random variables, is time and/or spatialdependent.

    WCE: decompose by orthogonalpolynomials, similar to a spectral method, but

    for random variables.

    ),,( dWxtu

    W

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    17/29

    Wiener Chaos Expansions

    any orthonormal basis of , such

    as harmonic functions in our computations.

    )(smi ),0(2

    YL

    Define which are independent

    Gaussian.

    ,)(0

    =Y

    sii dWsm

    Let construct Wicks products),,,( 21 =

    =

    =1

    ).()(i

    iiHT

    is a multi-index, Hermite polynomials.)( iiH

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    18/29

    Wiener Chaos Expansions

    Cameron-Martin(1947): any

    can be decomposed as

    ),,( dWxtu

    = ),(),(),,( aTxtudWxtu

    where

    )).(),,((),( TxtuExtu =

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    19/29

    Wiener Chaos Expansions

    Statistics can be reconstructed from Wiener

    Chaos coefficientsmean ),,(),( 0 xtuxtEu =

    variance

    22 ),)(( =

    uxtuE

    Higher order moments can be computed too.

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    20/29

    Wiener Chaos Expansions

    Properties of Wicks products:

    ,1))(( 0 =TE

    0,0))(( = TE

    = 1

    0

    )( TTE

    =

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    21/29

    Wiener Chaos Expansions

    Wiener Chaos expansions have been

    used in

    Nonlinear filtering, Zakai equation (Lototsky, Mikulevicius

    & Rozovskii, 97)

    Stochastic media problems (Matthies & Bucher, 99)

    Theoretical study of Stochastic Navier-Stokes equations

    (Mikulevicius & Rozovskii, 02)

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    22/29

    Hermite Polynomial Expansions

    A long history of using Hermite polynomials in

    PDEs containing Gaussian random variables.

    Random flows: Orszag & Bissonnette (67),Crow & Canavan (70),

    Chorin (71,74),Maltz & Hitzl (79),

    Stochastic finite element: Ghanem, et al (91,99, ).

    Spectral polynomial chaos expansions:Karniadakis, Su and collaborators (a collection of papers), and

    WCE for problems in fluid: Hou, Rozovskii, Luo, Zhou (04)

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    23/29

    WCE for stochastic Helmholtz equation

    Expand the source and electric field:

    Take advantage of

    Equation is linear, so electric field hasexpansion

    )(),(),,( ii

    TtyJdWtyJ

    =

    =

    =1

    )()(i

    ii ymydW

    )(),,(),,,( ii TtyxEdWtyxE =

    = ii ymtVdWtyJ )()(),,( Only Gaussian (linear)

    = ii tyxEdWtyxE ),,(),,,(

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    24/29

    WCE for stochastic Helmholtz equation

    The stochastic equation is converted into a

    collection (decoupled) of deterministic

    Helmholtz equations

    Standard numerical methods, such as finite

    difference time domain (FDTD) in oursimulation, can be applied.

    )())(()),,()(,()),,(()),,(( ymtVtyxEyxtyxEtyxE itttiyyixxi =+

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    25/29

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    26/29

    WCE for stochastic Helmholtz equation

    The electric fields from point sources

    can be recovered by

    Other moments can be computed by point

    source solutions in the standard ways.

    Under relative general conditions, WCE

    coefficients decay quickly,

    ),,( tyxEpi

    =j

    jij

    p

    i tyxEymtyxE ),,()(),,(

    1,

    i r

    E Oi

    r Related to the smoothnessof the solutions.

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    27/29

    Simulation of a spatially incoherent source

    Extremely fast convergence for 10ax10a example

    Comparison of the direct method

    (brute-force) simulation and the

    WCE method

    Convergence of the WCE method

    S l f ll h

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    28/29

    Simulation of a spatially incoherent source (3)

    Less than 1% error and more than one order of magnitude faster simulation,

    Over 2 order of magnitude faster simulations for practical photonic crystals.

    For 15 coefficients the gain in simulation time is 32, i.e., 32 times faster simulation

    Percentage

    error

    Number of coefficients

    20ax10a

    For a 20ax10a example (doubled sized)

    C l i

  • 8/9/2019 otws2_7351

    29/29

    Conclusion

    Proposed a stochastic model for incoherent source

    Design a fast numerical method based on WCE to

    simulate the incoherent source for photonic crystals.

    The method can be coupled with other fast Maxwell

    equations solvers.

    More than 2 order of magnitude faster simulations can

    be achieved for practical structures.

    The model and method are general and can be applied

    to other types of stochastic problems involving incoherent

    sources.