Osteomyelitis: The Role of Radiography in Diagnosis
Transcript of Osteomyelitis: The Role of Radiography in Diagnosis
Osteomyelitis: The Role of Radiography in Diagnosis
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
March, 2011Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
2
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Let us begin with a patient presentation.
Our Patient: History• 51 yo M with a history of hypertension who
presents with right foot swelling of two months’ duration
• The process began with a “callus” that he noticed on the underside of his right foot, which flaked off to reveal an ulcerated surface
• Over the intervening two months, his foot became progressively swollen, but not painful
• His PCP had tried him on courses of Doxycycline and Ciprofloxacin, with some improvement, but without resolution
• On the day prior to admission, he underwent a foot X-ray which showed findings concerning for osteomyelitis 3
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Our Patient: Foot X-ray
4
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Source: BIDMC PACS
5
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Having introduced our patient and looked briefly at his presenting X-ray, let us talk about osteomyelitis.
We will return to his X-ray shortly.
Osteomyelitis: Overview
• Infection of bone• Can occur by:
• Contiguous spreading (i.e. from an ulcer)• Hematogenous seeding (i.e. in bacteremia)• Direct inoculation (i.e. from trauma)
• Organisms responsible can be monomicrobial or polymicrobial• Hematogenous is usually monomicrobial
6
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Jeffcoate, WJ, et al. Clin Infec Dis. 2004
Osteomyelitis: Diagnosis
• Diagnosis of osteomyelitis requires one of the following:• Isolation of bacteria from a bone biopsy sample
obtained via sterile technique, together with histologic findings of inflammation and osteonecrosis
• Positive radiologic finding beneath a foot ulcer• Positive radiologic finding with positive blood
cultures• Probing to bone in a diabetic foot ulcer• Diabetic foot ulcer greater than 2 X 2 cm
7
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Jeffcoate, WJ, et al. Clin Infec Dis. 2004; Grayson, ML, et al, JAMA, 1995
Osteomyelitis: Diagnosis
• Diagnosis of osteomyelitis requires one of the following:• Isolation of bacteria from a bone biopsy sample
obtained via sterile technique, together with histologic findings of inflammation and osteonecrosis
• Positive radiologic finding beneath a foot ulcer• Positive radiologic finding with positive blood
cultures• Probing to bone in a diabetic foot ulcer• Diabetic foot ulcer greater than 2 X 2 cm
8
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Jeffcoate, WJ, et al. Clin Infec Dis. 2004; Grayson, ML, et al, JAMA, 1995
9
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Having introduced the concept of osteomyelitis and the ways to diagnose it, let us discuss the specific radiologic findings that support a diagnosis.
We will start with X-ray.
Osteomyelitis: X-ray Findings
10
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
• Sensitivity 43-75%, specificity 75-83%• Timing
• Soft tissue changes visible in 3 days• Bone changes visible in 1-2 weeks
• Early findings• Bone: osteopenia
• Late findings• Bone: cortical erosion, mixed lucency and sclerosis,
periosteal reaction• Soft tissue: swelling
Pineda, C, et al. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2006
11
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Now let us return to our patient’s foot X-ray to look for some of the specific findings suggestive of osteomyelitis.
12
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
• Marked bone lysis of the distal first metatarsal, first proximal phalanx, and first distal phalanx
• Mild cortical lucency and sclerosis of the medial aspect of the distal second metatarsal
• Marked soft tissue swelling along the medial foot and surrounding the first toe joints
• Solid periosteal reaction of the first metatarsal
Source: BIDMC PACS
Our Patient: Foot X-ray
13
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Having discussed the findings of osteomyelitis on X-ray and examined our patient’s foot X-ray, let us continue with a discussion of findings on MRI that are suggestive of osteomyelitis.
We will then look at an example from a patient with recurrent pubic symphysis osteomyelitis.
Osteomyelitis: MRI Findings
Acute/Active• Medullary space:
• Fat is replaced by edema, so:• Low signal on T1• High signal on T2, STIR, or
fat-suppressed sequences• Possible cortical disruption• Wide transition zone• Soft tissue: edema, abscess, sinus
tract, ulcer, cellulitis
Chronic• Low signal on T1 and T2• Bone sclerosis with cortical
thickening• Sequestra on gadolinium-
enhanced T1• Narrow transition zone
14
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
• Sensitivity 82-100%, specificity 75-96%• Can detect early (i.e. within 3-5 days)
Pineda, C, et al. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2006; Sammak, B, et al, Eur Radiol, 1999
Source: BIDMC PACS
Source: BIDMC PACS
Companion Patient #1: MRI Pelvis
15
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Axial T1
Axial T2 Fat Suppression
• Areas of low signal intensity• Soft tissue irregularity
• Areas of high signal intensity• Soft tissue irregularity• Superficial hyperintensity
consistent with cellulitis
Source: BIDMC PACSSource: BIDMC PACS
16
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Coronal Post-ContrastAxial Pre-Contrast
• Sinus tract
Companion Patient #1: MRI Pelvis
17
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Having discussed the findings of osteomyelitis on MRI, let us continue with a discussion of findings on CT that are suggestive of osteomyelitis.
We will then look at an example from a patient with osteomyelitis involving the left hip joint.
Osteomyelitis: CT Findings• Superior spatial resolution compared to MRI,
but lower sensitivity and specificity• Useful when MRI is contraindicated or
unavailable, or for surgical planning• Bone findings: cortical breakdown, trabecular
changes, periosteal reaction, intraosseous gas• Soft tissue findings: sinus tract projection• Particularly good for showing sequestra and
involucra (discussed later)18
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Pineda, C, et al. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2006; Sammak, B, et al, Eur Radiol, 1999
• Intraosseous gas• Cortical thinning• Soft tissue edema
19
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Axial C- Coronal C- Sagittal C-
• Intraosseous gas• Cortical thinning• Soft tissue edema
• Intraosseous gas• Deep tissue
emphysema
Source: BIDMC PACS Source: BIDMC PACS Source: BIDMC PACS
Companion Patient #2: CT Hip
20
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Having looked at the findings of osteomyelitis on X-ray, MRI, and CT, let us look briefly at some findings specific to osteomyelitis that are visible on all three modalities.
Osteomyelitis: Additional Findings
21
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
• Sequestrum• Large devascularized fragment of bone
separated from healthy bone after undergoing ischemic necrosis
• Involucrum• New bone deposited around a sequestrum,
resulting from cortical damage stimulating the periosteum to lay down new bone and surround the sequestrum
• Brodie’s abscess• Subacute form of osteomyelitis• Common in children, especially boys• Focal abscess most commonly found in the
metaphyses of long bones, particularly the tibia
All photos courtesy of Sergio Fernández Tapia, MD, Tampico, Mexico, from Pineda, C, et al, Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2006
Pineda, C, et al. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2006; Sammak, B, et al, Eur Radiol, 1999
22
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Now let us discuss the role of nuclear medicine in diagnosing osteomyelitis.
Osteomyelitis Nuclear Medicine: Bone Scan Findings
• Three-phase bone scan with radiolabeled marker like Technetium-99• Flow phase: immediately after injection
• Shows areas of increased blood flow, i.e. inflammation• Pooling phase: 15 minutes after injection
• Shows areas of vascular permeability• Delayed phase: 4 hours after injection
• Shows areas of retained uptake, most specific for osteomyelitis• Sensitivity/Specificity
• If positive in three phases, sensitivity 73-100%• Metanalysis: sensitivity 61%, specificity 25%• Sensitivity decreases with coexisting conditions, like trauma,
surgery, orthopedic hardware, diabetes
23
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Pineda, C, et al. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2006
24
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Now we will see an example of a three-phase bone scan, showing increased uptake in the right foot in all three phases, consistent with a diagnosis of osteomyelitis.
Companion Patient #3 Foot Bone Scan: Flow Phase
25
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
R LCourtesy of Dr. Kevin Donohoe
26
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Companion Patient #3 Foot Bone Scan: Flow Phase
Courtesy of Dr. Kevin Donohoe
27
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Courtesy of Dr. Kevin Donohoe
Companion Patient #3 Foot Bone Scan: Flow Phase
28
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Now let us turn to a brief discussion of other nuclear modalities, with an emphasis on the gallium scan.
Osteomyelitis Nuclear Medicine Findings: Gallium
Scan• Uses radiolabeled gallium, which likely attaches to
acute phase reactant proteins• Good sensitivity (25-80%)• More specific than three-phase bone scan (67%)• False positives due to fracture and neoplasm• Scan occurs 24 hours after injection, so only useful
in the clinically stable patient
29
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Pineda, C, et al. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2006
Osteomyelitis Nuclear Medicine: Other Studies
• Tagged WBCs• Radiolabeled antibiotics• Labeled immunoglobulins• Streptavidin• 111In-biotin
30
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Pineda, C, et al. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2006
31
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Having completed our discussion of the various imaging modalities used in diagnosing osteomyelitis, we will now return to our patient.
Our Patient: Surgery• Given his foot ulcer with radiographic findings
consistent with osteomyelitis, he underwent surgical exploration, debridement, and biopsy
• Grossly, there was very little necrotic or actively infected tissue
• The biopsy result showed: • “Fragments of granulation tissue with chronic inflammation,
bone with reparative changes and focal necrosis with marrow space fibrosis and chronic inflammation; no significant acute inflammation noted.”
• Wound culture grew Staphylococcus aureus, susceptible to Methicillin
32
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Our Patient: Treatment
• Given a known Penicillin allergy, the patient was started on IV Daptomycin, with a PICC line for home therapy totaling six weeks
• At the time of last follow-up, he had finished his Daptomycin course and, as his foot had showed signs of improvement, he had been transitioned to oral Moxifloxacin
• Follow-up with Infectious Disease and Podiatry is ongoing
33
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
34
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
To end, we will look at an algorithm for working up the possibility of osteomyelitis in a patient with a foot ulcer, highlighting our patient’s course as previously described.
An Algorithm: Putting It All Together
35
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Source: Lipsky BA, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004
Take-Home Points• Osteomyelitis is an infection of bone• The gold standard for diagnosis is a sterile surgical biopsy,
but imaging can play a great role in the absence of that• X-ray is the first line for imaging, as it is fast and
inexpensive, but its sensitivity is only fair, since it takes weeks for changes to become apparent
• MRI is the best modality, both in terms of sensitivity and specificity, and in terms of its ability to detect changes early on
• Nuclear medicine studies have good sensitivity, but mixed specificity, as many other conditions can cause increased focal uptake of radiolabeled markers
• Many algorithms exist for how to diagnose osteomyelitis in different clinical scenarios… follow them!
36
Spencer McClelland, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
37
Acknowledgments
• Dr. Jim Wu• Dr. Kevin Donohoe• Dr. David Glazier• Dr. Mai-Lan Ho• Dr. Monica Agarwal• Dr. Gillian Lieberman• Emily Hanson
Student Name, yearGillian Lieberman, MD
38
References• Grayson, ML, et al. Probing to bone in infected pedal ulcers. A clinical sign of
underlying osteomyelitis in diabetic patients. JAMA. 1995 Mar 1;273(9):721-3.• Jeffcoate, WJ, et al. Controversies in Diagnosis and Management of
Osteomyelitis of the Foot in Diabetes. Clin Infect Dis. (2004) 39 (Supplement 2): S115-S122.
• Lipsky, BA, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infections. Clin Infect Dis. (2004) 39 (7): 885-910.
• Mader JT, et al. Update on the diagnosis and management of osteomyelitis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1996;13(4):701-24
• Pineda, C, et al. Imaging of Osteomyelitis: Current Concepts. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2006 Dec;20(4):789-825.
• Sammak, B, et al. Osteomyelitis: a review of currently used imaging techniques. Eur Radiol. 9,894-900 (1999).
Student Name, yearGillian Lieberman, MD
THANK YOU!
And Happy Belated St. Patty’s Day, from Brooklyn the Irish Croco-Dog!
39
Student Name, yearGillian Lieberman, MD