OSMOSE

Nathalie Grisey, RTE R&D, project coordinator

BRIDGE General Assembly 11th and 12th February 2020

Parallel Session 7 Sector Integration

WP1 : optimal mix of flexibilities

today to 2050

FLEXIBILITYNEEDS

FLEXIBILITYSOLUTIONS?

Synergies?

Multi-sector technologies considered:

– Electrification of heating

– Smart electric vehicles

– Power to Gas

• OSMOSE : 2018-2021 – 28M€

Flexibility assessment –

France 2035

Scenario V Scenario A (more RES)

Scenario V Scenario A (more RES)

Increasing needs of weekly power flexibility : potential for smart EV?

High needs of seasonnal energyflexibility : potential for gas?

More info : Multi-temporal assessment of power system flexibility requirement, Heggarty and al.

https://hal-iogs.archives-ouvertes.fr/PERSEE/hal-01998837v1

05ES

07ES

17FR 18FR

42PL

43PL

44PL

63BA

RS

80NO

04ES

14FR 15FR

06ES

19FR

21FR

22FR

26FR 35DE

33DE34DE

37DE

72DK

45PL

48CH

52IT

57SI

62HR

53IT64ME

54IT

55IT

70AL

92UK

96IE

95UK

99FR

41PL

73EE

75FI

77LT

78LV

66BG

68GR101MI

69GR

105LY

104TN

56IT

98IT

16FR

10ES

103DZ

09ES

13PT

102MA

59RO

01ES

02ES

03ES

08ES

12PT

39CZ

20FR

24FR 58HU

100EA

46SK

50AT51AT

40CZ29LU

25FR

27FR

23FR

65RS

67MK

47CH

36DE

11ES

107NS

94UK

28BE

88SE

93UK

114NS

31DE

79NO

87SE

81NO82NO

49AT

60RO

61RO

83NO

84NO 86SE

74FI

85NO

112NS

113NS

111NS

116NS

115NS109NS

108NS

91UK

On-shore cluster

Rest of the World cluster

Nord Sea off-shore cluster

AC link with impedance and GTC

AC link with GTC only

DC link

Equiv. link with RoW

Equiv. link with Nord Sea cluster

110NS

106NS

2

1

6

6

14

82

14

14

14

12

3

62

90UK 30NL

311 919

413

4

1

6

4

4

79

4

238DK

2

89SE

32DE

3

2

4

4

2

2

2

3

3

4

73

2

2

2

2

2

21

1

MethodologyTwo open source simulators of the European

system :GENESYS✓ Capacity expansion ✓ Interfaces with gas, heating and

mobility

ANTARES✓ Unit commitment✓ Probabilistic✓ 100 regions in Europe

http://www.genesys.rwth-aachen.de/wordpress/https://antares-simulator.org/

Gas – Electricity interface (1/2)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Electricity to Gas Gas to electricity Electricity to Gas Gas to electricity Electricity to Gas Gas to electricity

2014 2030OSMOSE scenario "Current goals

achieved"

2050OSMOSE scenario "Current goals

achieved"

Interface Electricity - Gas (Europe, electrical TWh)

To produce back electricity For "pure" gas usage From "electrical gas" From other gas

40% efficiency

• Gas generation offers a significant flexibility in decarbonised scenarios• Power2Gas becomes significant in ambitious decarbonised scenarios in 2050

Other gas usage

-40000

-30000

-20000

-10000

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

Example of a country hourly profile in 2050

Gas to Elec

Elec to Gas

SUMMERSPRING

• Power2Gas is at full power most of summer• Gas generation is limited but with very high peaks in winter

Gas – Electricity interface (2/2)

EV : France – 2035 (1/2)

• Adequacy : In the most challenging case, with 16 millions EV, security of supply is ensured with only ~50% of (simple) smart charging.

• CO2 emissions : With a low carbon power mix, EV development reduces the GHG footprint of transportation, even when including battery’s LCA

• Type of charge : Smart charging and V2G can reduces the cost of electricity generation

More info : RTE study

https://www.rte-france.com/sites/default/files/electromobilite_synthese_9.pdf

EV : France – 2035 (2/2)

• A large part of total benefits can be attained using simple smart-charging (static

tariff-based)

• Economic gains associated with V2G are high, even though they are dependent on

deployment level of smart charging

More info : RTE study

https://www.rte-france.com/sites/default/files/electromobilite_synthese_9.pdf

Next steps

1) Consolidate the scenarios by iterations

between the models - 2020

2) Analyse the behaviors and benefits of the

different interacting technologies - 2021

https://www.osmose-h2020.eu/

@Osmose_H2020

osmose-h2020

https://www.osmose-h2020.eu/

Thanks for your attention

✓ EU funded (Grant : 21.8 M€)

✓ 33 partners

✓ Leaders: RTE, REE,

TERNA, ELES, CEA,

TUB

✓ 2018 – 2021

The consortium

Studies

OSMOSE workplanDemonstrators

Grid forming by multi-services hybrid

storage (WP3)

Multi-services by different storage

and FACTS devices (WP4)

Multi-services by coordinated grid

devices, large demand-response and

RES (WP5)

Near real-time cross-border energy market (WP6)

Market designs

and regulations

(WP2)

Optimal mix of

flexibilities (WP1)

Scaling-up &

replication (WP7)

Demonstrators Mapping

GENERATION DEMAND GRID STORAGE

Wind Hydro IndustrialDynamicthermal rating

Hybrid storage

OFFER-DEMAND BALANCING WP6

RESERVE (FCR, FRR)WP5 WP3

WP4

SYNCHRONISM AND INERTIAWP5

WP4WP3

VOLTAGEWP5 WP5 WP4

CONGESTION MANAGEMENTWP6 WP5 WP5

WP4WP3

WP3

WP6

WP5

WP4

Flexibility assessment –

Methodology

Gap between Pmax and Pmin

“Unstored” energy in winter

Weekly requirement, sized for both power and energy

Daily requirement, sized for both power and energy

Annual requirement, sized for both power and energy

“Stored” energy in summer

Power system flexibility

Modulation aroundmean load

Annual modulation

Weekly modulation

Daily modulation

More info : Multi-temporal assessment of power system flexibility requirement, Heggarty and al.

https://hal-iogs.archives-ouvertes.fr/PERSEE/hal-01998837v1

Electricity – Gas detailed interface

Power system

Electrolysis Hydrogène

Gas grid

Industry

Mobility

Heat

Methanation

H2 storage

Gas storage

CCGT

Fuel cell

Gas uses

Hydrogen direct uses

Methane

Power-to-gas out

EV France – 2018

1240

420280 280 250 240

-10

-400

-200

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Natural charging Simple tariffcharging

Simple tariffcharging and

contracted powermanagement

Vehicle-to-home Vehicle-to-grid Vehicle-to-grid andreserve markets

Thermic vehicle BEV

Annual energ

y b

ill (

€/y

)

Fuel cost Market revenue Electricity cost (power)

Electricity cost (energy) Net annual charging cost

Annual energy expense for a vehicle travelling 14.000 km / year

More info : RTE study

Unidirectional charge Bidirectional charge

https://www.rte-france.com/sites/default/files/electromobilite_synthese_9.pdf