Original Issue 13/06/2007 - Flinders Council
Transcript of Original Issue 13/06/2007 - Flinders Council
FLINDERS ISLAND WIND FARM NOISE IMPACT ASSESMENT
Prepared by
Hydro-Electric Corporation
ARBN: 072 377 158
ABN 48 072 377 158
4 Elizabeth Street, Hobart
Tasmania, Australia
Original Issue 13/06/2007
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 ii
DOCUMENT INFORMATION TITLE Flinders Island Wind Farm Noise Impact Assessment
Appendix to the Environmental Impact Assessment and
Management Plan
CLIENT ORGANISATION Hydro Tasmania – Business Development
CLIENT CONTACT Robert Grant
DOCUMENT ID NUMBER 202132-NIA
PROJECT MANAGER Sue Marsh
PROJECT REFERENCE E202132
Current Document Approval
PREPARED BY James Weller Sign James Weller
SRE Date 13/06/2007
REVIEWED BY Brendon Bateman Sign Brendon Bateman
SRE Date 13/06/2007
APPROVED FOR
SUBMISSION
Sue Marsh Sign Sue Marsh
SRE Date 14/06/2007
Current Document Distribution List
Organisation Date Issued To
Document History and Status
Revision Prepared by Reviewed
by
Approved
by
Date
approved
Revision type
The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Hydro Tasmania Consulting. This document
may only be used for the purposes for which, and upon the conditions, the report is supplied. Use or copying of this
document in whole or in part for any other purpose without the written permission of Hydro Tasmania Consulting
constitutes an infringement of copyright.
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Hydro Tasmania is proposing the development of up to four wind turbines on Hayes Hill on
Flinders Island, Tasmania. This report describes the methodology and findings of the noise
impact assessment (NIA) undertaken for the development application. The NIA is based on
predicted wind farm noise levels and background data monitored at representative locations.
The methodology and acceptability limits that have been applied in this study are based on
New Zealand Standard NZS 6808-1998 and the Tasmanian Noise Measurement Procedures
Manual that was issued in July 2004. The acceptability limit criteria are as follows:
The L90, 10min1 wind farm noise level outside a noise sensitive receptor2 should not exceed the
greater of:
an amenity or absolute limit of 40 dB(A) L90,10min , or
an intrusiveness limit being the L90,10min background noise level + 5 dB,
over the operating wind speed range of the turbines.
There are five houses in the vicinity of the wind farm site.
Background monitoring has been undertaken at two representative locations around the site.
This monitoring confirmed that the eastern side of the wind farm is slightly quieter than the
western side, and can be used for post-installation compliance monitoring.
Three makes and model of wind turbine generator (WTG) are currently being considered for
the development as follows: Enercon E33, WindFlow W500 and Vestas V52 turbines. For
the purposes of this study a wind farm layout of three Vestas V52 turbines was assumed.
This model and layout is considered to be a typical scenario for the site in terms of noise
impacts.
Assessment Conclusions
For the assumed wind farm layout it is predicted that the L90,10min noise levels will be
acceptable at all existing dwellings in the vicinity of the proposed wind farm, over its full
operating wind speed range.
1 The received wind farm sound pressure level that is exceeded for 90% of the 10 minute measurement interval.
2 Eg a dwelling, school or office.
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 iv
Based on existing vegetation cover and other determinants of background noise, future
houses built on the eastern side of the hill and outside the 40 dB(A) predicted noise level
contour will not be subjected to unacceptable L90,10min wind farm noise levels over the full
operating wind speed range of the assumed wind farm layout.
Commitments & Recommendations
1. When the wind turbine make, model and layout have been finalised a revised noise
impact assessment shall be submitted to Council in order to confirm that noise emissions
from the wind farm will be acceptable at all dwellings in the vicinity.
2. A compliance survey of the operational noise levels shall be conducted post
commissioning of the wind farm.
3. It is recommended that Council ensure that future housing developments are not located
too close to the wind farm in order to ensure that residents are not exposed to
unacceptable noise emissions from the facility.
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 v
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION 7
2. Methodology 8
2.1 Relevant Standards & Regulatory Documents 8
2.2 Acceptability Limit Criteria 8
2.3 Character of the Wind Farm Noise 9
2.4 Assessment Procedure 9
3. General Site Description 10
3.1 Characteristics of the Site 10
3.2 Structures and Land Use at the Wind Farm Site 10
4. Wind Farm Noise Level Prediction Modelling 13
4.1 Methodology 13
4.2 WTGs 14
4.3 Wind Farm Layouts 14
4.4 Noise Modelling Results 15
5. Background Monitoring and Acceptable Limit Definition 17
5.1 Methodology 17
5.2 Identification of Affected Noise Sensitive Dwellings 17
5.3 Background Monitoring Locations 18
5.3.1 Characteristics of the Monitoring Locations 18 5.3.1.1 Location A – South West of Turbines near Lady Barron Road 18
5.3.1.2 Location B - East of Turbines on the Thule Property 22
5.4 Background Monitoring & Definition of the Acceptability Limit 24
5.4.1 Monitored Data 24 5.4.1.1 Location A 25
5.4.1.2 Location B 26
5.4.2 Data Analysis for Definition of Acceptability Limits 26
6. Transformer NOISE Levels Assessment 28
7. Assessment & Conclusions 29
7.1 Acceptability Assessment 29
7.2 Conclusions of the Noise Impact Assessment 29
8. Commitments & Recommendations 30
9. REFERENCES 31
10. APPENDIX 1 Manufacturer’s Turbine Data 32
11. APPENDIX 2 Figures and Tables 33
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 vi
LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3-1 Hayes Hill 30m Tower - Long Term Average Wind Rose at 30m
Level 10
Figure 3-2 Location of Existing Houses & Background Noise Monitoring Locations around the Proposed Wind Farm Site 12
Figure 4-1 Predicted Noise Level Contours at 8m/s at 10m AGL 16
Figure 5-1 Looking north at western logging location 19
Figure 5-2 Looking east at western logging location, southern turbine on left hill 20
Figure 5-3 Looking south at western logging location 21
Figure 5-4 Looking west at western logging location 21
Figure 5-5 Looking north at eastern logging location, Thule property 22
Figure 5-6 Looking east at eastern logging location, Thule property 23
Figure 5-7 Looking south at eastern logging location, Thule property 23
Figure 5-8 Looking west at eastern logging location, Thule property, towards turbines 24
Figure 5-9 Flinders Island wind data, 30m level, noise logging period of 17 days 25
Figure 11-1 Location A Monitored Background Noise and Wind Data Plots 33
Figure 11-2 Location B Monitored Background Noise and Wind Data Plots 34
Figure 11-3 Hays Hill Background Sound Pressure Level vs. Wind Speed, Location A 35
Figure 11-4 Hays Hill Background Sound Pressure Level vs. Wind Speed, Location B 36
Figure 11-5 Plot of Predicted V52 Wind Farm Noise Levels and the Acceptability Limit at House 3 37
LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1 Houses in the Vicinity of the Wind Farm Site 11
Table 4-1 Rated Sound Output of Selected Wind Turbines 14
Table 4-2 Identified Wind Turbine Sites 14
Table 4-3 Predicted WTG Noise levels at Reference Conditions dB(A) 15
Table 5-1 Acceptable Limit Noise levels at Reference Conditions 27
Table 7-1 WTG and Acceptable Limit Noise levels at Reference Conditions dB(A) 29
Table 11-1 Monitoring Location A 38
Table 11-2 Location B: East of turbines 40
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 7
1. INTRODUCTION
Hydro Tasmania is proposing the development of up to four wind turbines on Hayes Hill on
Flinders Island, Tasmania. This report describes the methodology and findings of the noise
impact assessment (NIA) undertaken for the development application (DA). The NIA is based
on predicted wind farm noise levels and background data monitored at representative
locations.
The make and model of the wind turbine generators (WTGs) is not yet finalised.
Consequently this study is based on a model and layout scenario that is typical of the options
currently under consideration.
The background noise monitoring campaign was undertaken in July 2002 when the wind
farm was initially considered. Data collected during this period is still considered to be valid
because there have been no substantial changes to the site or to the immediate area since
this time.
Transformer noise is included in this study.
Construction phase noise is not dealt with in this study.
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 8
2. METHODOLOGY
2.1 Relevant Standards & Regulatory Documents
Currently there are no Tasmanian or Australian Standards issued for the assessment of
noise related to wind farms in Tasmania.
The existing Australian Standard covering the measurement of environmental noise, AS
1055.1-1997 (Ref. 3), applies to wind-independent noise sources and stipulates that
measurements are not to be taken in wind speeds above 5m/s (at 1.2m AGL). This may not
be possible at some exposed receptor locations found near a typical wind farm site, where
the wind turbine and background noise levels are both functions of the wind speed, with
similar orders of magnitude and character.
The New Zealand Standard NZS 6808-1998 (Ref. 5) was used for Woolnorth, Musselroe,
Heemskirk and Huxley Hill (King Island) wind farms setting a precedent for the assessment
of wind farm noise in Tasmania.
Consequently, the acceptability limits and methodology upon which the development permit
conditions for Flinders Island will be based are the New Zealand Standard and the
Tasmanian Noise Measurement Procedures Manual that was issued in July 2004 (Ref. 1).
2.2 Acceptability Limit Criteria
The L90, 10min3 wind farm noise level outside a noise sensitive receptor4 should not exceed the
greater of:
an amenity or absolute limit of 40 dB(A) L90,10min , or
an intrusiveness limit being the L90,10min background noise level + 5 dB,
over the operating wind speed range of the turbines.
The L90 statistical descriptor, on which the limits are based, is that which is used when
measuring wind farm noise levels. For prediction purposes, the more conventional Leq5
descriptor is used. In general, for wind farm noise levels, the Leq, 10min value is approximately
2dB greater than the L90, 10min level (Ref. 5). No adjustment has been made in this study to the
predicted levels, thus incorporating a margin of conservatism.
3 The received wind farm sound pressure level that is exceeded for 90% of the 10 minute measurement interval.
4 Eg a dwelling, school or office.
5 A type of average noise level for the 10-minute measurement period.
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 9
Note that the A-weighting applies to all noise levels in this report. This means that noise
levels are frequency-weighted to better reflect what is heard by the human ear. Essentially,
the contribution from lower frequencies is 'filtered' out.
2.3 Character of the Wind Farm Noise
It is generally assumed that the predominant character of wind turbine noise, at typical
acceptable separation distances is steady6 with no prominent tones discernible (Ref. 5).
Manufacturers supply certified information in accordance with IEC-61400-11 (Ref. 4), or
similar, to demonstrate the tone free status of their turbines.
If the received turbine noise is found to have annoying characteristics such as a distinct tone
or modulation effect such as the ‘swishing’ sound of the turbine rotor blades, a penalty of 5dB
for each effect is arithmetically added to the predicted noise level.
2.4 Assessment Procedure
This assessment comprises the following steps:
1. Plotting of the predicted 35dB(A) Leq noise-level contour at reference conditions7. Any
locations outside this contour are considered protected from unacceptable wind farm
noise levels.
2. Prediction of the received wind farm noise level at each dwelling within this 35dBA
contour, and if necessary adjusted for tonality or modulation effects.
3. Background monitoring at locations representing each of these selected dwellings to fully
define the acceptable intrusive limit criterion.
4. Acceptability assessment at each selected dwelling by direct application of the
acceptability limits described in 2.2 above.
6 Over a given 10 minute monitoring interval.
7 10m/s at 10m above ground level (AGL).
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 10
3. GENERAL SITE DESCRIPTION
3.1 Characteristics of the Site
The proposed wind farm on Flinders Island is to be located approximately 2km east of
Whitemark.
The proposed wind farm site lies on a ridge running north-south, and is exposed to the
prevailing west/south-westerlies travelling across Bass Strait (See Figure 3-2). Ground cover
is predominantly pasture grass and some low level vegetation on the slopes of the ridge, with
some 2-3m high shrubs near Nalinga Creek to the south.
Average wind direction data collected at the site from the Hayes Hill anemometer station
between 1991 and 2002 is summarised in the frequency-distribution wind roses in Figure
3-1. Hayes Hill is approximately 2 km north of the proposed wind farm.
Figure 3-1 Hayes Hill 30m Tower - Long Term Average Wind Rose at 30m Level
Clearly the prevailing winds are from the west and west-southwest.
3.2 Structures and Land Use at the Wind Farm Site
There are five houses in the vicinity of the wind farm site, the closest being to the west and
southwest of the wind farm putting them generally upwind of it in prevailing conditions (See
Figure 3-2 and Table 3-1). No other structures exist near or on the proposed wind farm site.
The land in and around the site is used mostly for grazing livestock.
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 11
Table 3-1 Houses in the Vicinity of the Wind Farm Site
House Coordinates (AGD 66)
Easting (m) Northing (m)
1 589,166 5,555,811
2 589,134 5,555,925
3 589,107 5,556,111
4 588,962 5,557,216
5 590,116 5,557,925
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 12
Figure 3-2 Location of Existing Houses & Background Noise Monitoring Locations around the Proposed Wind Farm Site
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 13
4. WIND FARM NOISE LEVEL PREDICTION MODELLING
4.1 Methodology
The noise propagation model used in this study is based on hemispherical spreading from a
point source, assumed to be the hub of the turbine rotor, with attenuation through air calculated
for each octave band.
The apparent point source sound power level at the hub of the turbine rotor (LWA) is
determined using a certified procedure in accordance with recognised standards such as
IEC-61400-11 (Ref. 4). The procedure is based on near-field measurements, which are
based on the Leq descriptor.
The sensitivity of the sound power output to wind speed (i.e. the slope of the linear response
in dBA/m/s) is also given so that the sound pressure level can be determined for a given
wind speed. For variable speed machines the response may not be linear. In this case a plot
or function may be given.
Propagation modelling is used to determine the predicted turbine sound pressure level at a
receptor location from each WTG. The model calculates attenuation due to absorption of
noise in air for each octave band, as per ISO9613-1 (Ref. 6) and then logarithmically adds
them to get the received broadband Leq sound pressure level from the WTG. An air
temperature of 15° and a humidity of 70% were assumed for this study.
For multiple WTG's the individual predicted Leq sound pressure levels are combined using
logarithmic addition.
This basic model does not take into account the shielding effects of topography and
obstacles, or the absorption effects of ground cover. The consequent degree of conservatism
(i.e. over-prediction of the noise levels) is likely to be around 1dB to 2dB when there is a line
of sight to the turbines and as much as 10dB to 12dB when there is not (Ref. 5).
The model also assumes the purely theoretical situation that all radial directions are down wind
of each turbine. Therefore the propagation field gives the worst-case noise level in any
direction. In practice there will be a few dB attenuation in the cross-wind direction and as much
as 10dB if there is any upwind component, although this will be reduced if there is no ground
between the turbines and the receiver, eg across a gully.
An independent comparison check using the CONCAWE noise model was performed (by
Vipac acoustic consultants in Adelaide) on a Roaring Forties8 wind farm layout in South
8 A joint venture subsidiary company of Hydro Tasmania and China Light & Power
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 14
Australia. This sophisticated model includes such effects as ground absorption, topography
and wind propagation. The basic model gave results within 1 dB of the more complex model,
and is therefore a good approximation of the worst-case wind propagation effect for a typical
wind farm located along a ridgeline such as Flinders Island.
4.2 WTGs
Three makes and model of WTG are currently being considered as follows: Enercon E33,
WindFlow W500 and Vestas V52.
Their respective sound power levels at reference conditions, which are similar to the rated
power output of the turbine, are given in Table 4-1.
Table 4-1 Rated Sound Output of Selected Wind Turbines
Turbine Hub Height* (m) SPWref# (dB(A)) S## (dB(A)/m/s)
Enercon E30** 50 99.0 NA
WindFlow W500 55 101.0 NA
Vestas V52 44 104.1 1.1 # Sound power level at reference conditions ie 8m/s at 10m AGL ## Response of sound power level to wind speed. *The hub heights shown are those of the subject turbine for the independent certification tests. **The sound power level information for the E33 was not sourced. The level given is for the Enercon E33’s predecessor the E30. Documentation from Enercon indicates that the E33’s sound power level is less than that of the E30 due to design improvements. The V52 hub height of 44m given in Table 4-1 is that of the subject turbine of the
independent noise level certification test. The proposed V52 hub height for Hayes Hill is 49m.
This additional 5m hub height will have a negligible effect on the noise impact.
Note that the Enercon E33 and the WindFlow W500 are significantly quieter than the Vestas
V52 turbine. This study is based on the Vestas V52 turbines.
The independent certification test report for the Vestas V52 WTG is provided as an appendix
to this report. The report indicates that no audible tones are present.
4.3 Wind Farm Layouts
Four turbine sites have been selected whose coordinates are shown in Table 4-2. The wind
farm will have a maximum of four turbines, depending on the rotor diameter of the selected
make and model.
Table 4-2 Identified Wind Turbine Sites
Location E N Land Owner
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 15
1 589,740 5,556,860 T Rowe
2 589,845 5,556,540 Thule
3 589,900 5,556,440 Thule
4 589,930 5,556,345 Thule
Figure 4-1 shows the three-turbine V52 layout for which Location 3 was not used as there
is not sufficient distance between the wind turbines. The expected received noise levels
from this scenario are similar to a four-turbine E33 or W500 wind farm.
4.4 Noise Modelling Results
The wind farm layout has been modelled using the noise model described above in Section
4.1.
The predicted Leq noise level contours are given in Figure 4-1.
Table 7-1 gives the predicted levels at each house.
Table 4-3 Predicted WTG Noise levels at Reference Conditions dB(A)
House V52 SPL*ref (Leq)
1 37
2 38
3 39
4 37
5 34
*3 x Vestas V52 wind farm sound pressure level at reference conditions ie 8m/s at 10m AGL
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 16
Figure 4-1 Predicted Noise Level Contours at 8m/s at 10m AGL
for 3 x Vestas V52 Wind Farm
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 17
5. BACKGROUND MONITORING AND ACCEPTABLE LIMIT DEFINITION
5.1 Methodology
Background monitoring is necessary to define the intrusiveness acceptability limit. At
significant wind speeds (>8m/s at 10m above the ground) background noise is predominantly
caused by the wind. Since exposure is dependent on local topographic shielding effects,
monitoring is necessary at each receptor where a potentially unacceptable wind farm noise
level is predicted.
Background monitoring is undertaken in accordance with NZS 6808. Unattended L90, 10min
measurements are taken continuously for a period of around 14 days. The noise data is
correlated with the synchronised wind speed and direction data gathered at the wind farm
site monitoring mast, using a 3rd order polynomial. The intrusiveness acceptability limit is
determined by arithmetically adding 5dBA to the correlation curve.
The large data set provides confidence in the unattended measurements by reducing the
significance of any louder-than-usual short-term background noises such as those due to
rain, running-water-following-rain, agricultural machinery, stock, intermittent road traffic and
the like. Filtering the data by time of day can actually remove similar source noises such as
those made by insects in the afternoon or birds in the morning. However, care must be
taken when using this method since confidence in the correlation may be reduced because
fewer data points are being used.
‘Binning’ a data set with a wide range of wind directions into 30o direction subsets allows an
assessment to be made of the sensitivity of the shielding characteristics of the site with
regard to wind direction. A low variation provides justification to use the whole data set, when
determining the intrusiveness acceptability limit, in order to take advantage of the greater
number of data points for the correlation.
5.2 Identification of Affected Noise Sensitive Dwellings
Figure 3-2 shows that dwellings 1, 2, 3 and 4 lie within the 35dB(A) Leq predicted noise-level
contour at 8m/s at 10m AGL. Consequently representative background data is required for
these dwellings in order to undertake an acceptability assessment of the wind farm noise
levels they are likely to experience.
Since the predicted wind farm noise level at House 5 is below 35 dB(A) it is considered
comfortably protected from unacceptable wind farm noise levels without the need for further
assessment.
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 18
5.3 Background Monitoring Locations
Only two noise loggers were available for this noise monitoring campaign. Sites were chosen
to meet the following criteria:
1) The location should be representative of nearby dwellings with relation to surrounding
vegetation, topography and line of site to the wind farm.
2) A location to both the east and west of the hill upon which the wind farm is to be sited
was necessary to capture directional shielding effects of the topography.
3) The microphone shields were not rated for wind speeds above 5m/s. Therefore, it
was necessary to obtain relatively sheltered locations.
4) The suitability of the location for post-commissioning compliance-monitoring, ie the
location should have a clear line of sight to the nearest wind turbines.
On this basis the following monitoring sites were chosen and are described in detail below.
Monitoring Location A is regarded as being representative of the existing assessable nearby
Houses 1 to 4, which are to the west and northwest of the wind farm site.
Monitoring Location B is a typical representation of the eastern side of the hill and could be
used for any future houses in the area. Currently there are no houses on the eastern side of
the hill.
5.3.1 Characteristics of the Monitoring Locations
5.3.1.1 Location A – South West of Turbines near Lady Barron Road
The monitoring location near Lady Barron Road is approximately 515m 500 from the closest
wind turbine with coordinates of E589515 and N5556040. See Table 11-1 for further
information.
The landscape around Location A consists of undulating, marshy and grassy ground. There
is a clear line of sight to all turbines from this position. A thick set of bushes lies to the west,
protecting the logger from wind noise in the prevailing wind direction. A small dam nearby
had water running through it, giving a constant trickling noise. Land past the bushes to the
coast is clear grazing land. A shed with a pump inside is located approximately 50m north.
Lady Barron Road is located 50m to the west.
The nearest dwelling – House 2 - is located approximately 380m to the west of monitoring
Location A. This dwelling has some tall vegetation surrounding it that will otherwise reduce
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 19
the background noise at the dwelling but will not shield the dwelling from the noise levels
being emitted by the wind farm.
The types of sources contributing to the background noise at Location A are:
Wind
Trickling water at the dam
Intermittent car noise from Lady Barron Road
Intermittent water pump
Figure 5-1 Looking north at western logging location
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 20
Figure 5-2 Looking east at western logging location, southern turbine on left hill
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 21
Figure 5-3 Looking south at western logging location
Figure 5-4 Looking west at western logging location
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 22
5.3.1.2 Location B - East of Turbines on the Thule Property
The monitoring site in Thules’ property is approximately 460m 2680 from the closest wind
turbine with coordinates of E590210 and N5556840. See Table 11-2 for further information.
The landscape at Location B consists of rural grazing land, on a slope down from Hayes Hill
ridge, with hills in the distance to the east and south. The location was chosen due to the
presence of bushes which would shield the logger from excessive background noise from the
wind. There is a direct line of sight to all turbines from this location. Location B is exposed to
the noise from the sea and wind has a direct line of site with the wind turbines. Location B is
on the lee side of the ridge when the prevailing wind comes from the west, which will reduce
the noise from the wind in this direction.
The sources contributing to background noise at Location B are:
Wind
Intermittent farm vehicles passing
Intermittent animal noises (bleating)
Figure 5-5 Looking north at eastern logging location, Thule property
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 23
Figure 5-6 Looking east at eastern logging location, Thule property
Figure 5-7 Looking south at eastern logging location, Thule property
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 24
Figure 5-8 Looking west at eastern logging location, Thule property, towards turbines
5.4 Background Monitoring & Definition of the Acceptability Limit
5.4.1 Monitored Data
Background noise monitoring was carried out at both monitoring locations continuously over
a three-week period form 16th July to the 2nd August 2002. The equivalent of 17 days of
continuous L90, 10min background data was collected at each location (See Figure 11-1 and
Figure 11-2).
The wind rose for the background-logging period at Flinders Island Location A is shown in
Figure 5-9.
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 25
Figure 5-9 Flinders Island wind data, 30m level, noise logging period of 17 days
A comparison of Figure 5-9 and the long term average wind data of Figure 3-1 demonstrates
that the wind distribution during the short period of noise measurement is not representative
of the long-term average distribution. The average wind speed was lower, and the wind was
predominantly from the north-west and north-east rather than from the west southwest.
Since the background monitoring session was unattended, no attempt has been made to
identify and delete any extraneous data points (eg noises from rain, insects, birds, etc). The
justification is that these relatively infrequent occurrences will have little or no effect on the
correlation, due to the relatively large data set.
Variations in the background noise levels due to time of day or wind direction have not been
investigated in detail. The spread of directions does not allow a definitive assessment of the
shielding-sensitivity to change in wind direction as several wind directions had insufficient
data points.
5.4.1.1 Location A
Wind and trickling water noises are the main contributors to background noise at this site.
At location A, the wind speed vs noise level plot exhibited a constant minimum noise level of
approximately 32 dB(A). This is assumed to be the trickling water which was about 20m
north of the noise logger.
The scatter in the data at higher wind speeds indicates that there is no obvious relationship
between shielding effects and wind direction, for the limited direction range experienced
during the monitoring period.
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 26
A shed exists on site in which there is a pump. It is unknown if this pump was used during
the logging period. Noises due to intermittent cars passing are not expected to affect 10
minute averages of background noise.
Taking into account all of the above mentioned features, all of the background data set for
site A should be used to determine the intrusive limit criterion at this particular site.
5.4.1.2 Location B
Wind was the main contributor to the background noise at this site.
Location B is generally slightly quieter than Location A. Considering the site was on the lee
side of the ridge for most of the monitoring period this is to be expected.
The clear separation of the data at higher wind speeds indicates that Location B is direction
sensitive, ie there appears to be a relationship between shielding effects and wind direction
for the limited direction range experienced during the monitoring period. But as explained
above a definitive directional-analysis is not possible.
All data from Location B will be used as the basis for the background noise levels for
assessing the intrusive limit criterion at this site.
5.4.2 Data Analysis for Definition of Acceptability Limits
Wind speeds were generally below 10m/s at 30m AGL, with the maximum 10-minute
average being just above 22m/s (Refer Figure 11-1). This range however, is more than
adequate for clearly defining the critical changeover-point (from absolute to intrusiveness) or
‘knee’ of the limit-of-acceptability curve, which approximately coincides with the typical rated
wind speed of the turbines.
Plots of background noise versus wind speed at 10m above ground level have been
produced for the full wind-direction set (See Figure 11-3 and Figure 11-4). The wind speed
and direction measurements at the anemometer were taken at a height of 30m to coincide
with the noise measurements. A wind shear coefficient was calculated using the long-term
data from the 16.5m and 30m height levels so that the wind speed for a height level of 10m
could be generated. A 3rd order polynomial correlation curve of-best-fit was defined for the
wind data. This is the equation that defines the L90, 10min background noise level.
The acceptability limit is determined by calculating the absolute and intrusive limit curve for
each site using background noise level data and applying the rules defined in Section 2.2.
See Figure 11-3 and Figure 11-4.
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 27
The derived acceptability limit at reference conditions for each monitoring location is given in
Table 7-1.
Table 5-1 Acceptable Limit Noise levels at Reference Conditions
Monitoring Site Acceptable Limit ref L90 (dB(A))
A 41
B 40
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 28
6. TRANSFORMER NOISE LEVELS ASSESSMENT
The turbines are expected to have a pad mounted transformer outside each tower. The
transformer rating is likely to be less than 1000 kVA. The maximum sound power level, from
AS 2374.6-1994 (Ref. 2), is 74 dBA for this size of transformer. This will attenuate to 20 dBA,
giving a penalised value of 25 dBA, at a distance of 200 m. Therefore the sound contribution
of the transformers can be ignored.
A smaller pole-top mounted transformer is expected to be installed to the south west of the
site, in the vicinity of background noise monitoring location A. The noise levels from this
transformer are expected to be negligible at nearby Houses 1 to 3.
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 29
7. ASSESSMENT & CONCLUSIONS
7.1 Acceptability Assessment
For each nearby house the predicted WTG noise level was compared to its representative
limit to assess acceptability of the predicted noise levels at reference conditions. See Table
7-1.
Table 7-1 WTG and Acceptable Limit Noise levels at Reference Conditions dB(A)
House Acceptable Limit * ref (L90) V52 SPL**ref (Leq) Acceptable?
1 41 37 Yes
2 41 38 Yes
3 41 39 Yes
4 41 37 Yes *Based on monitoring location A
** 3 x Vestas V52 wind farm sound pressure level at reference conditions ie 8m/s at 10m AGL
For the worst case – House 3 - the predicted WTG Leq noise level regression-curve was
compared to its representative L90 noise level limit curve (from Monitoring Location A) to
assess acceptability of the predicted Leq noise levels over the wind speed range of the
monitoring period as shown in the plot of Figure 11-5. As can be seen acceptability was
achieved.
7.2 Conclusions of the Noise Impact Assessment
For the assumed typical likely wind farm layout comprising three Vestas V52 WTGs, the
predicted Leq, noise levels are acceptable at all existing dwellings in the vicinity of the
proposed wind farm, over the wind speed range of the background monitoring period
undertaken for this study.
From the information provided in Section 2.2 and observing that the plots in Figure 11-5
diverge it can be concluded that the statement above comfortably extends to expected
L90,10min wind farm noise levels over the full operating wind speed range of the V52 WTGs.
Based on existing vegetation cover and other determinants of background noise, future
houses built on the eastern side of the hill and outside the 40 dB(A) predicted noise level
contour shown in Figure 4-1 will not be subjected to unacceptable L90,10min wind farm noise
levels over the full operating wind speed range of a three-turbine Vestas V52 wind farm.
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 30
8. COMMITMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS
1. When the wind turbine make, model and layout have been finalised a revised noise
impact assessment shall be submitted to Council in order to confirm that noise
emissions from the wind farm will be acceptable at all dwellings in the vicinity.
2. A compliance survey of the operational noise levels shall be conducted post
commissioning of the wind farm.
3. It is recommended that Council ensure that future housing developments are not
located too close to the wind farm in order to ensure that residents are not exposed to
unacceptable noise emissions from the facility.
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 31
9. REFERENCES
Ref. 1 “Noise Measurement Procedures Manual”, July 2004, Tasmanian Department of Primary Industries, Water & Environment.
Ref. 2 AS 2374.6-1994 "Power Transformers- Determination of transformer and reactor sound levels", Standards Australia.
Ref. 3 AS 1055.1-1997 "Acoustics- the Assessment and Measurement of Environmental Noise", Standards Australia.
Ref. 4 IEC-61400-11, 1998 "Wind Turbine Generator Systems- Part 11: Acoustic Noise Measurement Techniques", International Energy Committee.
Ref. 5 NZS 6808:1998 "Acoustics- The Assessment and Measurement of Sound from Wind Turbine Generators", Standards New Zealand.
Ref. 6 ISO 9613.1, June 1993 “Acoustics – Attenuation of Sound During Propagation Outdoors – Part 1: Calculation of the Absorption of Sound by the Atmosphere”, International Energy Committee.
While all care has been undertaken to ensure that the information provided in this document
is accurate at the time of preparation, to the extent permissible by the Trade Practices Act
1974 (Cth), Hydro Tasmania Consulting takes no responsibility for any loss or liability of any
kind suffered by the recipient in reliance of its contents arising from any error, inaccuracy,
incompleteness or similar defect in the information or any default, negligence or lack of care
in relation to the preparation or provision of the information.
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 32
10. APPENDIX 1 MANUFACTURER’S TURBINE DATA
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 33
11. APPENDIX 2 FIGURES AND TABLES
Monitored Sound Data At: Location A: East of turbinesStart of Monitoring Period: 17/07/2002 13:40
End of Monitoring Period: 04/08/2002 23:50
Monitored Wind Data At: Hayes Hill @ 30m
Distance to Anemometer = 2739 m Distance to nearest turbine = 513 m
Bearing to Anemometer = 347 Degrees Bearing to nearest turbine = 54 Degrees
MONITORED BACKGROUND SOUND & WIND DATA PLOTS
Eastern Standard
Time
Monitored 10 Minute Mean Wind Speed (m/s)
0
5
10
15
20
25
15/07/02 17/07/02 19/07/02 21/07/02 23/07/02 25/07/02 27/07/02 29/07/02 31/07/02 02/08/02 04/08/02
Date
Monitored 10 Minute Mean Wind Direction (Degrees)
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
360
15/07/02 17/07/02 19/07/02 21/07/02 23/07/02 25/07/02 27/07/02 29/07/02 31/07/02 02/08/02 04/08/02Date
Monitored BACKGROUND L90,10min Sound Pressure Level (dBA)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
15/07/02 17/07/02 19/07/02 21/07/02 23/07/02 25/07/02 27/07/02 29/07/02 31/07/02 02/08/02 04/08/02
Date
Figure 11-1 Location A Monitored Background Noise and Wind Data Plots
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 34
Monitored Sound Data At: Location B: east of turbinesStart of Monitoring Period: 17/07/2002 14:40
End of Monitoring Period: 02/08/2002 8:30
Monitored Wind Data At: Hayes Hill @ 30m
Distance to Anemometer = 2281 m Distance to nearest turbine = 470 m
Bearing to Anemometer = 325 Degrees Bearing to nearest turbine = 273 Degrees
MONITORED BACKGROUND SOUND & WIND DATA PLOTS
Eastern Standard
Time
Monitored 10 Minute Mean Wind Speed (m/s)
0
5
10
15
20
25
15/07/02 17/07/02 19/07/02 21/07/02 23/07/02 25/07/02 27/07/02 29/07/02 31/07/02 02/08/02 04/08/02
Date
Monitored 10 Minute Mean Wind Direction (Degrees)
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
360
15/07/02 17/07/02 19/07/02 21/07/02 23/07/02 25/07/02 27/07/02 29/07/02 31/07/02 02/08/02 04/08/02Date
Monitored BACKGROUND L90,10min Sound Pressure Level (dBA)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
15/07/02 17/07/02 19/07/02 21/07/02 23/07/02 25/07/02 27/07/02 29/07/02 31/07/02 02/08/02 04/08/02
Date
Figure 11-2 Location B Monitored Background Noise and Wind Data Plots
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 35
MONITORED BACKGROUND SOUND DATA AT:
y = -0.0029x3 + 0.1375x
2 - 0.6619x + 34.245
R2 = 0.4766
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 5 10 15 20 25
Monitored 10 Minute Mean Wind Speed (m/s)
So
un
d P
res
su
re L
ev
el
(dB
A)
Monitored L90,10min Data
Acceptability limit
Poly. (Monitored L90,10minData)
ANEMOMETER DATA FROM :
Location A: South-west of turbines
Hayes Hill @ 30m
PLOT OF BACKGROUND SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL v WIND SPEED
347 0Bearing to Anemometer =
START:
END:17/07/2002 13:40
04/08/2002 23:50
Eastern
Standard Time
m2739Distance Between Instruments =
Number of Data Points
= 2202
Full Background Data Set
54 0Bearing to nearest WTG =
m513Distance to nearest WTG =
Figure 11-3 Hays Hill Background Sound Pressure Level vs. Wind Speed, Location A
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 36
Figure 11-4 Hays Hill Background Sound Pressure Level vs. Wind Speed, Location B
MONITORED BACKGROUND SOUND DATA AT:
y = -0.0122x3 + 0.4132x
2 - 2.2102x + 30.254
R2 = 0.606
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 5 10 15 20 25
Monitored 10 Minute Mean Wind Speed (m/s)
So
un
d P
res
su
re L
ev
el
(dB
A)
Monitored L90,10min Data
Acceptability limit
Poly. (Monitored L90,10min
Data)
ANEMOMETER DATA FROM :Location B: East of turbines
Hayes Hill @ 30m
PLOT OF BACKGROUND SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL v WIND SPEED
325 0Bearing to Anemometer =
START:
END:17/07/2002 14:4002/08/2002 08:30
Eastern
Standard Time
m2281Distance Between Instruments =
Number of Data Points = 2195
Full Background Data Set
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 37
MONITORED BACKGROUND SOUND DATA AT:
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 5 10 15 20 25
Monitored 10 Minute Mean Wind Speed (m/s)
So
un
d P
ressu
re L
evel
(dB
A)
Acceptability Limit Based onBackground Data atLocation A
V52 104 dBA WTG
ANEMOMETER DATA FROM :
House 3Hayes Hill @ 30m
PLOT OF BACKGROUND SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL v WIND SPEED
347 0Bearing to Anemometer =
START:
END:17/07/2002 13:4004/08/2002 23:50
Eastern
Standard Timem2739Distance Between Instruments =
54 0Bearing to nearest WTG =m513Distance to nearest WTG =
Figure 11-5 Plot of Predicted V52 Wind Farm Noise Levels and the Acceptability Limit at House 3
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 38
Table 11-1 Monitoring Location A
PARAMETER DESCRIPTION / VALUE COMMENTS
Logging Start Date & Time 16/07/2002 17:35 Eastern Standard Time
Installation Date & Time 17/07/2002 13:10 Eastern Standard Time
End Date & Time 04/08/2002 23:50 Eastern Standard Time
Monitoring Period 17 Days
Number of 10min Data Sets. 2202 Synchronised background noise, wind speed and wind direction, 10 min data triples,
starting on the hour.
Noise Measurement Position
E0589515m N5556040m
1.2m AGL, 20m S of dam,
5m E bushes
This position is in direct line of sight of the turbines, and directly between the
turbines and the nearest house, which lies to the south-west of the proposed wind
farm.
Noise Measurement
Equipment, Make & Model.
Acoustic Research Laboratories
(ARL) EL-215 Environmental
Noise Logger. Serial Number
194607
Type II (IEC-651, AS-1259). Noise Floor = 26dBA. Sampling Rate = 16 samples per
second.
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 39
Microphone Windscreen Make
& Model
Pulsar WS 90- 90mm standard
wind screen.
Anemometer Position
E0588904m N5558710m
10m AGL
Hayes Hill 30m Tower. Distance from Noise Monitoring Location = 2739m. Bearing
from Noise Monitoring Location = 347. Sampling frequency = every 2 seconds.
Closest WTG Location E0589928m N5556344m Southern turbine in Figure 4-1. Distance from Noise Monitoring Location = 513m.
Bearing from Noise Monitoring Location = 54.
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 40
Table 11-2 Location B: East of turbines
PARAMETER DESCRIPTION / VALUE COMMENTS
Logging Start Date & Time 16/07/2002 17:33 Eastern Standard Time
Installation Date & Time 17/07/2002 14:30 Eastern Standard Time
End Date & Time 02/08/2002 08:40 Eastern Standard Time
Monitoring Period 17 Days
Number of 10min Data Sets. 2195 Synchronised background noise, wind speed and wind direction, 10 min data triples,
starting on the hour.
Noise Measurement Position E0590210m N5556840m, 1.2m
AGL Near bushes and fence in gate. No houses nearby.
Noise Measurement
Equipment, Make & Model.
Acoustic Research Laboratories
(ARL) EL-215 Environmental
Noise Logger. Serial Number
194652
Type II (IEC-651, AS-1259). Noise Floor = 26dBA. Sampling Rate = 16 samples per
second.
Microphone Windscreen Make
& Model
Pulsar WS 90- 90mm standard
wind screen.
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014
Flinders NIA for EIA&MP - 202132-NIA Hydro Tasmania Consulting Revision No: O
Original Issue 13/06/2007 41
Anemometer Position
E0588904m N5558710m
10m AGL
Hayes Hill 30m Tower. Distance from Noise Monitoring Location = 2281m. Bearing
from Noise Monitoring Location = 325. Sampling frequency = every 2 seconds.
Closest WTG Location E581507m N5488601m Northern turbine in Figure 4-1. Distance from Noise Monitoring Location = 470m.
Bearing from Noise Monitoring Location = 273.
Annex 5 - Item A1 - Oct 2014