organzation climate.doc

INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION

Organizational climate is comprised of mixture of norms, values, expectations, policies and procedures that influence work motivation, commitment and ultimately, individual and work unit performance. Positive climate encourages, while negative climates inhibits discretionary effort. Organizational climate refers to the quality of working environment. If people feel that they are valued and respected within the organization, they are more likely to contribute positively to the achievements of the business outcomes. Creating a healthy organizational climate requires attention to the factors which influence employees perceptions, including the quality of leadership, the way in which decisions are made and whether the efforts of employees are recognized. In fact Climate may be thought of as the perceptions of the characteristics of an organization.

Climate for an organization is somewhat like the personality for a person. Just as every individual has a personality that makes each person unique, each organization has an organizational climate that clearly distinguishes its personality from other organization. Every organization is different and has a unique feeling and character beyond its structural characteristics. Thus every organization deals with its member in a distinct way through its policies on allocations of resources, communication pattern, reward and penalty, leadership and decision making style, etc. The organizational policy and conviction with regard to all these and a cluster of other related activities influence the feelings, attitudes and behavior of its members and results in the creation of the unique organizational climate.

The content of organizational climate has varied widely and they include almost all the important aspect of organizations such as structure, communication, leadership, Conflicts, reward system, inter personal relationships organizational effectiveness, reasonability and so forth. It has been pointed out that the contents of the climate constructed by various researches overlap wit many other major concepts in organizational behavior Glick, 1985). Such overlaps seems to have promoted researchers to raise the question how the concept of climate is different from other organizational variables, especially, structure and job satisfaction.IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE:

Organizational climate has a major influence on human performance through its impact on individual motivation and job satisfaction. It does this by carrying certain kinds of expectancies about what consequences will follow from different actions. Individuals in the organization have certain expectations and fulfillment of these expectations depend upon their perception as to how the organizational climate suits to the satisfaction of their needs. Thus organizational climate provides a type of work environment in which individuals feels satisfied or dissatisfied. Since satisfaction of individual goes a long way in determining his efficiency, organizational climate can be said to be directly related with his performance in the organization.Affects Motivation, Productivity and Job satisfaction:

Organizational climate can have a major influence on motivation, productivity and job satisfaction. Climate determines the action and it creates few expectations as to consequences. Employees expect certain rewards, penalties, satisfaction or frustrations based on the organizational climate and their expectations tend to lead to motivation as said in expectancy theory.

Contingency Relationship:

There is a contingency relationship between climate and the organization. The climate of an organization is contingent upon the type of employees. The type related to employees education like technical workers, knowledge workers. For example, research institutes certainly want a climate different from that of a workshop or an office.

Social System:

Organizational climate represents the entire social system of a work-group. It is clearly a system concept. There are two important aspects of climate: (1) workplace itself and (2) Personal treatment of Management. If employees feel satisfied while at work and if climate provides a sense of personal worth, it can be assumed that in that organization is favorable. Employees expect the management to feel and care about their needs and problems. If these two are favorable a good climate prevails in the organization.

A high level of organizational climate is necessary for the development of organization. Good climate attracts good and efficient to the organization, who contribute to the productivity of the organization.

DIMENSIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE: Organizational climate have used data relating to individual perception of organizational properties in identifying organizational climate. Denison (1996) argues that developing a universal set of dimensions was often the central issue of the climate researchers so that comparative studies could be made possible in different organizational settings. He compared this approach to that of the culture research that used a post-modem perspective which examined the qualitative aspects of individual social contexts where each culture that was seen as unique and was not expected to have generalisable qualities which had become central to the climate research.

Jones and James (19790 argued that one of the assumptions of the climate literature is that a relatively limited number of dimensions could characterise a wide cross-section of social settings. Jones and James labelled their factors as follows:

Conflict and ambiguity, which reflected perceived conflict in organizational goals and objectives, combined with ambiguity of organizational structure and roles, a lack of interdepartmental cooperation, and poor communication from management. Also included were poor planning, inefficient job design, a lack of awareness of employee needs and problems, and a lack of fairness and objectivity in the rewards process.

Job challenge, importance and variety, which reflected a job perceived as challenging, which involve a variety of duties, including dealing with other people. The job was seen as providing autonomy and feedback, and demanding high standards of quality and performance.

Leader facilitation and support, which reflected perceived leader behaviors such as the extent to which the leader was seen as helping to accomplish work goals by means of scheduling activities, planning, etc., as well as the extent to which he was perceived as facilitating interpersonal relationships and providing personal support.

Workgroup cooperation, friendliness, and warmth, which generally described relationships among group members and their pride in the workgroup.

Professional and organizational esprit, which reflected perceived external image and desirable growth potential offered by the job. Also included were perceptions of an open atmosphere to express ones feelings and thoughts, confidence in the leader, and consistently applied organizational policies, combined with nonconflicting roles expectations and reduced job pressure.

Job standards, which reflected the degree to which the job was seens as having rigid standards of quality and accuracy, combined with inadequate time, manpower, training and resources to complete the task.

OBJECTIVES

To study the level of organizational climate prevailing in the Organization.

To study the factors influencing organizational climate.

To study the organizational climate using seven dimensions: Environment, Team work, Management Effectiveness, Involvement, Rewards and recognition, Competency and Commitment

To study the impact of climate dimension on organizational climate. To study the employees attitudes towards the organization.LIMITATIONS

Opinions of employees may be biased at time.

The sample size consists of 100 among 1200 employees. Finding of the study has its own limitations.

Since SIRF is very large organization it was not possible to cover all departments within a period of month.

SUNDARAM INDUSTRIES LIMITED RUBBER FACTORY, MADURAI

Company Overview:

The TVS group is one of the Indias largest industrial groups. TV Sundaram Iyengar is the founder of the group. SUNDARAM INDUSTRIES LIMITED is one of the members of the TVS group. Sundaram Industries Limited is promoted by TVS is a subsidiary of the parent company of the TVS group. SIRF is a largest manufacturer of molded Rubber products in India established in 1962. Its annual turnover is Rs.1354 Million and is today proud to employ a workforce of over 1200 employees.

Vision

To become leading market player in rubber industry and consistently exceed the customers expectations.

Mission

To increase the overall productivity.

To improve performance in development of products & reduce the lead-time.

To achieve zero customer complaint status.

To concentrate on peoples development.

To consistently upgrade and improve the operating systems to enhance both internal and external customer satisfaction.

HRD Policy

To establish sound education system for imparting to all employees at all levels there by enhancing knowledge and skill to perform their job letter and to accomplish organization goals which ultimately end in customer delight.

Quality Policy

To achieve customer satisfaction through manufacture and supply of quality products that meet customer specification. SIRF believes that quality has to be built in at all stages of the activity by adherence to quality assurance system involving every employee of the organization.

Quality Journey

SIRF has been among the first to be awarded /certified for...

Deming Prize

TPM

ISO 9001

QS 9000

ISO 9000

TS 16949

TPM

To become a Leading Market player by continuously enhancing the performance of People, Machine, Product & Practices through TPM. The company satisfies the following conditions.

Zero Breakdown

Zero accidents

Zero defects

Zero Mould Failures

Zero customer complaints

Increase the overall plant effectiveness by reducing all loses.

Minimum Inventory and Flexible staffing.

Education and Multiskill Development.

To create green, clean and pleasant work environment.

About Sundaram Industries Limited

Milestones

1962 - Tyre repair materials, bushkits.

1972 - Expansion.

1977 - In-house tool room.

1981 - Injection moulding.

1986 - Supply for Maruti Suzuki-engine mounts.

1992 - Formation of strategic business units.

1993 - ISO 9002.

1996 - Tie up with Bridgestone Japan.

1998 - ISO 9001.

1999 - QS 9000.

2000 - TPM Kick-off.

2001 - Cell manufacturing.

2004 - TPM Excellence Award & TS 16949.

2006 - Achieved TPM consistency Award Jan 07

It has two plants, one in Madurai-Tamilnadu and the other in Gurgaon-New Delhi. Its success is mainly due to excellence in quality and customer satisfaction.Factory AreaMaduraiGurgaon

Factory14000 Sq.m2300 Sq.m

Office3000 Sq.m400 sq.m

The warehouses are located in India are as follows,

Bangalore

Vijayawada

Cochin

Chennai

Mumbai

AhmedabadThe others include Detroit (USA) and Rotterdam (Europe) in foreign countriesOperating sequence

The company runs in 3 shifts per day and runs for 304 days per year.

Shift schedule (factory)

Shift I

12.00 am to 8.00 am

Shift II

8.00 am to 4.00 pm

Shift III

4.00 pm to 12.00 am

Shift schedule (office)

Shift-general9.00 am to 5.00 pm

Products manufactured

The company manufactures more than 5000 different products. The major products manufactured are:

Diaphragm

Mounting

O-rings

Rubber parts

Rollers

Bellow boots

Dust cover

Dust seal for cables

Suspension Bushes

Tank wheelsHow products are manufactured

The technique used for manufacturing the components is moldings by the help of machines.

The Rubber is got from kerala. The necessary oil, paints, chemicals like sulfur are brought from outside and stored in the storage area.

Certain substances like

1. Silicon mixes

2. Acrylic mixes

3. Paints are stored in air conditioned room. The temperature of the room is about 25 + or - 4 degree centigrade.

The policy that they are using is FIRST IN AND FIRST OUT service which means whatever that comes in first goes out. This is indicated by the green colored tag that is kept on the place of the storage.

The first section where manufacturing process starts is called MILLING section. Here the rubbers are first put in the Kneaders and mixed well with other chemicals.

The Kneaders (Machine name) are of two types. One is the SLACH Kneader and the other is the MORIYAMMA Kneader.

The product that is obtained is put in the mixing mills in order to get the rubber in the form of sheets. The milling machine consists of two rollers rotating in opposite directions and if we put the rubber in that we can get an even rubber sheet.

It then goes to the IP stores. It is the place where they cut the rubber in required sizes and shapes (slug) which can be used for moulding purposes.

The machine that they are using above is called is STRAINERS.

It then goes to the moulding section.

Here there are various types of presses used for moulding. They are

1. Jawahar press

2. Compression presses

3. Ejector type

4. Jai press

5. Hanchang 200 ton presses

The basic concept is they keep the slug in the mould cavity and close them and apply corresponding pressure and temperature to form the required mould.

The press generally consists of a top plate, bottom plate and a bolster plate and mostly ejector pins.

Each press has different mould cavity and so different temperature, pressure and curing time (the time that it takes to mould).

After the moulding process is complete they check whether the mould is good or suffering from any defect.

The major defects are,

1. Air lock

2. Line mark

3. Tearing

4. Blow

5. Excess flash

The defect products are torn and kept in a separate box.

It goes to the inspection and if necessary goes to shot blasting area.

There are two shot blasting machines 26:14 and 26:18 to make the material harder and more gripper.

Besides these the other machines are,

1. Calendar: It helps to form rolls and used in hose production and in some textile industry.2. Roll covering: It helps to form rolls of rubber over a product.3. Extruder: It is used to form thin tubes of rubber. The boilers are used to maintain pressure and temperature for the presses.

Major Competitors

Meenakshi mouldings, LG Tread, Scales rubber products, Lakshmi auto components, Fenner India ltd, Vulcan and Hitech array.

CLIENTS

The major customers are:

Ford

Maruti

Honda

Tata

Mahindra

Stone India

Toyota

Whirlpool

Wheels India ltd

Godrej

Bhel

Bharat Forge

DelphiContact Address:SUNDARAM INDUSTRIES LIMITED,

RUBBER FACTORY,

Post Box No. 6, Usilampatti Road,Kochadai, Madurai 625 016.

Phone: 91 452-2381531.

Fax: 91-452-2381240.ORGANIZATION CHART

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Organizational climate is a relative enduring characteristic of an organization which distinguishes it from other organization: (a) and embodies members collective perceptions about their organization with respect to such dimensions as autonomy, trust, cohesiveness, support, recognition, innovation and fairness: (b) is produced by members interaction; (c) serves as a basis for interpreting the situation; (d) reflects the prevalent norms, values and attitudes of the organizations culture; and (e) acts as a source of influence for shaping behavior. (Moran and Volkwein, 1992, p.2)

Francese (1993) who examined the effect of climate in service responsiveness; Meudell and Gadd (1994) who studied climate and culture in short life organizations; and Vallen (1993) who was concerned about organizational climate and service staff burnout. Organisational cliate has much to offer in terms of its ability to explain the behaviour of people in the workplace. Ashforth (1985, p. 838) put forward the view that climate has the potential to facilitate a truly integrative science of organizational behaviour,. Schneider later discussed in terms of:

The atmosphere that employees perceive is created in their organizations by practices, procedures and rewards Employees observe what happens to them (and around them) and then draw conclusions about the organizations priorities. They then sit their own priorities accordingly. (Schneider, 1994, p. 18)

Schneider, Brief and Guzzo (1996, p.9) argue that sustainable organizational change is most assured when both the climate what the organizations, members experience and the culture what the organizations members believe the organization values change. Early Formulations of the climate construct

The concept of climate can be traced back to the work of Lewin, Lippitt and White (1939) and a work entitled Patterns of aggressive behaviour in experimentally created social climates (Denison, 1996; Schneider, 1990). The Lewin et. Al. (1939) study investigated the relationship between leadership style and climate, a factor that has remained central to the concept, Joyce and Slocum (1982) trace the concept back to the studies of Koffka (1935) on behaviour environment; Lewins (1936) study on life space; and Murrays (1938) work on organizational climate. Lewins (1951) approach to climate was conceptualized by the relationship between individuals, their social environment and how that is set in a framework. Lewin expressed this in terms of simple equation:

B = f (P.E.) in which B = Behaviour, E= Environment, and P = the personIt is clear from Lewins equation that the concept of climate takes a psychological approach, focusing upon the individual and seeking to understand the cognitive processes and behaviour. Lewins conceptualization of the theory provides the underpinnings of many studies and approaches to climate research.

Three approaches to the climate construct

James and Jones (1974) conducted a major review of the theory and research on organizational climate ad identified climate in three separate ways that were not mutually exclusive, (a) multiple measurement organizational attribute approach, (b) perceptual measurement organizational attribute approach, and (c) the perceptual measurement individual attribute approach.

In the multiple measurement organizational approach james and jones cite forehand and Gilmer (1964) as defining organizational climate as a defining organizational climate as a set of characteristics that describe an organization and that (a) distinguish the organization from other organizations (b) are relatively enduring over time, and (c) influence the behavior of people in the organization. Schneider and Bartlett (1968) had proposed four organizational climate dimensions,

Individual autonomy: based on the factors of the individual responsibility, agent

interdependence, rules orientation and opportunities for exercising individual initiative.

The degree of structure imposed upon the position: based on the factors of structure, managerial structure and the closeness of supervision.

Reward orientation: based upon the factors of reward, general satisfaction, promotional-achievement orientation, and being profit minded and sales oriented.

Consideration, warmth and support: based upon the factors of managerial support, nurturing of subordinates and warmth and support.

In reviewing psychological climate as a set of perceptually based, psychological attributes Jones and James (1979) noted that the process reflected the developments that had occurred in the conceptualization of climate and the nature of its major influences. They propose that psychological climate:

(a) refers to the individuals cognitively based description of the situation;

(b) involves a psychological processing of specific perceptions into more abstract depictions of the psychologically meaningful influences in the situation;

(c) tends to be closely related to situational characteristics that have relatively direct and immediate ties to the individual experience; and

(d) is multidimensional, with a central core of dimensions that apply across a variety of situations(through additional dimensions might be need to better describe particular situations. (Jones and James, 1979, p.205)Schneider and Hall (1972) describe climate as a global perception held by individuals about their own organizational environment.

Schneider and Snyder (1975) further clarified the approach by defining climate as a summary perception which individuals form of (or about) an organization. For them it is a global impression of the organization.

Development of Climate InstrumentsCurrent instruments include Patterson, Payne and west (1996) Business Organisation Climate Index that consists of 28 item scales however only eight were used because of the length. Kozlowski and Dohertys (1989) instrument uses 55 measures consisting of 11 sub-scales that overlaps with Jones and James (1979). Joyce and Slocum (1982) used the same measures as Pritchard & Karasick (1973) with 10 dimensions that were factor analysed and reduced to six. Drexlers (1977) survey of operations that was based upon Taylor and Bowers (1972) a composite of several other instruments. Likerts (1976) profile of organizational characteristics.

Ryder and Southey (1190) used the James and Jones (1979) questionnaire as the basis for their instrument which they applied to employees with a large public building construction and maintenance authority in Australia. Modifications to the original instrument were threefold, consisting of modifications to the wording, scaling and presentation format. Ryder and Southey judged the scaling of the original instunment to be unsatisfactory.

Climate researchers typically placed greater emphasis on organizational members perceptions of observable practices and procedures that are closer to the surface of organizational life and categorization of these practices and perceptions into analytic dimensions defined by the researchers. (Denison, 1996, pp. 621 622). The studies have claimed that climate has a considerable impact upon organizational effectiveness.RESEARCH METHODOLGY

RESEARCH DESIGN: The study is descriptive research study. The main purpose of descriptive research is description of the state of affairs as it exists at present. In the present study, descriptive method is used to study the prevailing organizational climate. DATA COLLECTION METHOD: The primary data was collected through a well structured questionnaire with close-ended questions measures at 5-point likert type scale and suggestion questions. Secondary data required for the project was collected from the company records and Internet.

SAMPLING PLAN: Simple convenience sampling method is used. Sample size consists of 100 respondents.STATISTICAL TOOLS: Simple percentage analysis and tabulation is used to analysis the data. Bar diagram is used to give pictorial representation to the analysis. The following test was used for the study. Standard deviation

ANOVA

PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS: Percentage refers to a special kind of ratio. Percentage is used in making comparison about two or more series of data. Percentage as also used to describe relationship. It is also used to compare the relative terms dx of two or more series of data.

Formula:

Number of respondents x 100

Total no. of respondent

STANDARD DEVIATION:

Karl Pearson introduced the concept of Standard Deviation is 1893. It is the most important measure of dispersion and is widely used in many statistical formulae.

It is defined as positive squares-root of the arithmetic mean of the squares of the deviations of the given observation from their arithmetic mean. The standard deviation by the Greek Letter (sigma)

Formula: =

ANOVA: The analysis of variance frequently referred to by the contraction ANOVA is a statistical technique specially designed to test whether the means of more than two quantitative populations are equal. The analysis of variance technique developed by R.A. Fisher in 1920s diversified practical problems. Basically, it consists of classifying and cross classifying statistical results and testing whether the means of a specified classification differ significantly. In this way it is determined whether the given classification is important in affecting the results.

In one way classifications the data are classified according to only one criterion. The null hypothesis is

H0=M1=M2=M3=.MK.

H1=M1=M2=M3=.....MK.

To find the correlation factor:

C.F = T2

Total number of items in the given data.

To calculate the value of F:

F = Variance between Samples

Variance with in Samples Source of

Variation

Between Samples

Within SamplesSum of

Squares

SSC

SSEDegree of

Freedom

V1=C-1

V2=N-CVariance

SSC/C-1

SSE/N-C

SCOPE OF THE STUDY

The scope of this study confined to Sundaram Industries Limited Rubber Factory, Madurai. This study will give a brief picture of human side of the employees to know the level of climate prevailing in the organization.

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Table 1:

Age of the respondents

S. No.AgeNo of RespondentsPercentage

1.20 30 years1919

2.30 40 years6666

3.40 - 50 years1010

4Above 5055

Total100100

Chart 1:

Age of the respondents

Inference:

The above reveals the fact that Majority of the respondents, about 66% belong to the category of 3040 years of age and 19% belong to the category of 20-30 years of age and 10% belong to the category of 40-50 years of age and 5% belong to the category of above 50 years of age.

Table 2:Educational Qualification of the respondents

S. No.QualificationNo of RespondentsPercentage

1.Below SSLC1818

2.SSLC4545

3.XII3030

4.Diploma55

5.Degree22

Total100100

Chart 2:

Educational Qualification of the respondents

Inference:

The above reveals the fact that about 18% of the respondents are Below SSLC, 45% of the respondents are SSLC and 30% of the respondents are 12th standard. 2% of the respondents are degree holders and 5% of the respondents are diploma holders.Table 3:Respondents working years of experience in SIRFS. No.Working SinceNo of RespondentsPercentage

1.Below 51212

2.5 10 1010

3.10 15 5252

4.15 202020

5.Above 2066

Total100100

Chart 3:

Respondents working years of experience in SIRF

Inference:

From the above fact, the workings experiences in the organization of the respondents are about 52% belong to the category of 10-15 years and 20% belong to the category of 15-20 years. 6% of the respondents belong to the category of above 20 years and 10% of the respondents belong to the category of 5 -10 years and 12% belong to the category of below 5 years.

Table 4:

Response regarding safe working environmentS. No.OpinionNumber of RespondentsPercentage

1.Strongly Disagree44

2.Disagree44

3.Neutral--

4.Agree7171

5.Strongly Agree2121

Total100100

Chart 4:

Response regarding safe working environment

Inference:

Nearly 71% of the respondents agree with the safe working environment, 21% of the respondents strongly agree. 4% of the respondents disagree and remaining 4% of the respondents are strongly disagreeing related to safe working environment. Table 5:

Response regarding work area with clean, comfortable and necessary equipmentsS. No.OpinionNumber of RespondentsPercentage

1.Strongly Disagree--

2.Disagree88

3.Neutral44

4.Agree6363


Total100100

Chart 5:Response regarding work area with clean, comfortable and necessary equipments

Inference: From the above fact, it is clear that 25% of the respondents strongly agree and 63% agree that their work area is clean and comfortable with necessary equipments. 8% disagree and 4% of the respondents have no idea.

Table 6:Response regarding maintaining a good balance between work & other aspects of life

S. No.OpinionNumber of RespondentsPercentage


2.Disagree11

3.Neutral33

4.Agree7070


Total100100

Chart 6:Response regarding maintaining a good balance between work & other aspects of life

Inference: From the above reveals the fact that 24% strongly agree and 70% agree that they maintain a good balance between work and other aspect of life, 3% have no idea and remaining 1% disagree and 2% strongly disagree.Table 7:

Response regarding satisfaction with the working condition



2.Disagree77

3.Neutral11

4.Agree7272


Total100100

Chart 7:

Response regarding satisfaction with the working condition

Inference:

From the above reveals the fact that 17% of the respondent strongly agree and 72% agree with the satisfaction of the working conditions. 1% has no idea and remaining 7% disagree and 3% strongly disagree.

Table 8:

Response regarding flexibility to arrange work schedule to meet personal/family responsibilities



2.Disagree1818

3.Neutral44

4.Agree6565


Total100100

Chart 8:

Response regarding flexibility to arrange work schedule to meet personal/family responsibilities

Inference:

From the above reveals the fact that majority of the respondents, about 13% strongly agree and 65% agree that they have flexibility to arrange work schedule to meet personal/family responsibilities. 18% disagree and 4% have no opinion.

Table 9:Response regarding superior help and support



2.Disagree11

3.Neutral22

4.Agree7575


Total100100

Chart 9:

Response regarding superior help and support

Inference:

From the above fact reveals that employees receive help and support from the superior. Majority of the respondents about, 75% agree and 21% strongly agree. 2% have no idea, 1% percent disagrees and 1% strongly disagrees.

Table 10:Response regarding feedback by superior



2.Disagree11

3.Neutral99

4.Agree6969


Total100100

Chart 10:

Response regarding feedback by superior

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that 21% strongly agree and 69% agree that they receive regular feedback from their superiors. 9% have no idea and 1% disagrees. Table 11: Response regarding working with co-workers



2.Disagree--

3.Neutral11

4.Agree7272


Total100100

Chart 11: Response regarding working with co-workers

Inference:

Nearly 72% of the respondents agree and 27% strongly agree with the fact that they work in team with co-workers and 1% of the respondents have no idea.

Table 12:

Response regarding communication



2.Disagree66

3.Neutral66

4.Agree6666


Total100100

Chart 12:

Response regarding communication

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that majority of the respondents, about 22% strongly agree and 66% agree that their department communicate well with other department. 6% disagree and 6% have no idea. Table 13:Response regarding department contribution



2.Disagree11

3.Neutral2424

4.Agree6666


Total100100

Chart 13:

Response regarding department contribution

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that 28% of the respondents strongly agree and 66% agree that their department make a valuable contribution to the organization. 1% of the respondents disagree and 1% of the respondents strongly disagree and 24% of the respondents have no opinion. Table 14:

Response regarding department meets its customer requirements



2.Disagree--

3.Neutral22

4.Agree6868


Total100100

Chart 14:

Response regarding department meets its customer requirements

Inference:

From the above fact it is clear that majority of the respondents, about 29% strongly agree and 68% agree that their departments meet its customer requirements.

1% of the respondents strongly disagree and 2% of the respondents have no opinion.

Table 15:Response regarding management attention towards suggestion



2.Disagree--

3.Neutral11

4.Agree7575


Total100100

Chart 15:

Response regarding management attention towards suggestion

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that 24% strongly agree and 75% of the respondents agree that management pays careful attention to their suggestion and 1% of the respondents have no opinion. Table 16:Response regarding trust in management



2.Disagree11

3.Neutral11

4.Agree6666


Total100100

Chart 16:Response regarding trust in management

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that 32% strongly agree and 66% agree that they trust management.1% of the respondent disagree and 1% of the respondent have no opinion.Table 17:

Response regarding management understanding



2.Disagree22

3.Neutral44

4.Agree6868


Total100100

Chart 17:

Response regarding management understanding

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that majority of the respondent, about 26% strongly agree and 68% agree that management understand what is going on in their department. 4% have no opinion and 2% disagree. Table 18:

Response regarding treated with respect



2.Disagree22

3.Neutral44

4.Agree6969


Total100100

Chart 18:

Response regarding treated with respect

Inference:

Nearly majority of the respondents agree that they are treated with respect. 25% strongly agree and 69% agree. 4% of the respondents have no opinion and 2% of the respondents disagree.Table 19:Response regarding suggestions for the development of the organizationS. No.OpinionNumber of RespondentsPercentage


2.Disagree22

3.Neutral22

4.Agree7474


Total100100

Chart 19:

Response regarding suggestions for the development of the organization

Inference:

From the above fact it is clear that majority of the respondent, about 21% strongly agree and 74% agree that they wish to give suggestion for the development of the organization. 2% have no opinion and 2% disagree and 1% strongly disagree. Table 20:Response regarding information



2.Disagree44

3.Neutral2929

4.Agree6464


Total100100

Chart 20:Response regarding information

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that majority of the respondents, about 20% strongly agree and 64% agree that management adequately inform to the department about what is going on in the organization. 29% have no opinion and 4% disagree and 2% strongly disagree. Table 21:

Response regarding work process



2.Disagree33

3.Neutral33

4.Agree7474


Total100100

Chart 21:

Response regarding work process

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that 20% strongly agree and 74% agree that the organization encourages them to develop improved work process. 3% have no opinion and 3% of the respondents disagree.

Table 22:Response regarding involvement in decision making



2.Disagree44

3.Neutral1515

4.Agree6262


Total100100

Chart 22:

Response regarding involvement in decision making

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that majority of the respondents, about 18% strongly agree and 62% agree that management seeks the involvement of employees in decision making. 15% have no opinion, 4% disagree and 1% strongly disagrees. Table 23:Response regarding individual needsS. No.OpinionNumber of RespondentsPercentage


2.Disagree1414

3.Neutral1212

4.Agree6161


Total100100

Chart 23:Response regarding individual needs

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that majority of the respondents, about 13% strongly agree and 61% agree that organization is sensitive towards their individual needs. 12% have no opinion and 14% disagreeTable 24:Response regarding knowledge of other departmentS. No.OpinionNumber of RespondentsPercentage


2.Disagree44

3.Neutral1222

4.Agree6161


Total100100

Chart 24:Response regarding knowledge of other department

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that majority of the respondents, about 12% strongly agree and 61% agree that they know what is happening in other department. 22% have no opinion and 4% disagree and 1% strongly disagrees.

Table 25:Response regarding recognition of good workS. No.OpinionNumber of RespondentsPercentage


2.Disagree44

3.Neutral66

4.Agree6565


Total100100

Chart 25:Response regarding recognition of good work

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that majority of the respondents, about 25% strongly agree and 65% agree that they are recognized for their good work. 6% have no opinion and 4% of the respondents disagree..

Table 26:Response regarding receiving appropriate feedback about performance S. No.OpinionNumber of RespondentsPercentage


2.Disagree44

3.Neutral33

4.Agree7777


Total100100

Chart 26:Response regarding receiving appropriate feedback about performance

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that majority of the respondents, about 15% strongly agree and 77% agree that they receive appropriate feedback about their performance from the management. 3% have no opinion, 4% disagree and 1% strongly disagrees.

Table 27:Response regarding work expectation



2.Disagree22

3.Neutral1010

4.Agree7070


Total100100

Chart 27:Response regarding work expectation

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that majority of the respondents, about 18% strongly agree and 70% agree that realistic work is expected by the management. 10% have no opinion and 2% disagree.

Table 28:Response regarding satisfaction with the pay and benefit



2.Disagree1717

3.Neutral33

4.Agree6060


Total100100

Chart 28:Response regarding satisfaction with the pay and benefit

Inference: From the above fact reveals the employees satisfaction with the pay and benefit they receive. 17% of the respondents strongly agree, 60% agree, 3% have no idea and 17% disagree and 3% strongly disagree. Table 29:

Response regarding promotions based on the performance



2.Disagree99

3.Neutral1010

4.Agree6767


Total100100

Chart 29:

Response regarding promotions based on the performance

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that majority of the respondents, about 13% strongly agree and 67% agree promotions are based on performance. 10% have no opinion, 9% disagree and 1% strongly disagrees.

Table 30:Response regarding job related training



2.Disagree55

3.Neutral33

4.Agree7272


Total100100

Chart 30:Response regarding job related training

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that 18% of the respondents strongly agree and 72% agree that they receive adequate job related training. 5% of the respondents disagree and 2% of the respondents strongly disagree and 3% of the respondents have no opinion

Table 31:Response regarding skills to perform job effectively



2.Disagree--

3.Neutral44

4.Agree6868


Total100100

Chart 31:Response regarding skills to perform job effectively

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that 28% of the respondents strongly agree and 68% agree that they have skills to perform job effectively. 4% of the respondents have no opinion

Table 32:Response regarding improving performance



2.Disagree44

3.Neutral1414

4.Agree7171


Total100100

Chart 32:Response regarding improving performance

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that majority of the respondents, about 21% strongly agree and 71% agree that training helps to improve performance. 14% have no opinion and 4% strongly disagree.

Table 33:Response regarding stress in job



2.Disagree5050

3.Neutral55

4.Agree3535

5.Strongly Agree99

Total100100

Chart 33:Response regarding stress in job

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that 50% of the respondents strongly disagree and 35% agree that they have stress in job. 1% of the respondents strongly disagree and 9% of the respondents strongly agree. 5% of the respondents have no opinion

Table 34:Response regarding career development



2.Disagree22

3.Neutral55

4.Agree7575


Total100100

Chart 34:Response regarding career development

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that majority of the respondents, about 18% strongly agree and 75% agree that organization help them to develop themselves and their career. 5% have no opinion and 2% strongly disagree.

Table 35:

Response regarding work overloaded



2.Disagree4545

3.Neutral1010

4.Agree3838

5.Strongly Agree55

Total100100

Chart 35:

Response regarding work overloaded

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that 45% of the respondents strongly disagree and 38% agree that there work is overloaded. 5% of the respondents strongly agree and 2% of the respondents strongly disagree. 10% of the respondents have no opinion

Table 36:

Response regarding willingness to put extra effort



2.Disagree11

3.Neutral22

4.Agree7575


Total100100

Chart 36:Response regarding willingness to put extra effort

Inference:

From the above fact it is clear that majority of the respondents, about 21% strongly agree and 75% agree that they are willing to put extra efforts. 2% have no opinion , 1% disagree and 1% strongly disagree.Table 37:Response regarding proud to work in SIRF



2.Disagree11

3.Neutral22

4.Agree6767


Total100100

Chart 37:

Response regarding proud to work in SIRF

Inference:

From the above fact it is clear that 30% of the respondents strongly agree and 67% agree that they are proud to work in the organization. 2% of the respondents have no opinion and 1% of the respondent disagrees.

Table 38:Response regarding loyal towards SIRFS. No.OpinionNumber of RespondentsPercentage


2.Disagree11

3.Neutral33

4.Agree6565


Total100100

Chart 38:

Response regarding loyal towards SIRF

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that 31% of the respondents strongly agree and 65% agree that they are loyal to the organization. 3% of the respondents have no opinion and 1% of the respondent disagrees.Table 39:

Response regarding plan to spend entire career in SIRF



2.Disagree33

3.Neutral2121

4.Agree6767


Total100100

Chart 39:Response regarding plan to spend entire career in SIRF

Inference:

From the above fact it is clear that majority of the respondents, about 29% strongly agree and 67% agree that they plan to spend their entire career in the organization. 21% have no opinion and 3% disagree.Table 40:Response regarding high working morale



2.Disagree11

3.Neutral33

4.Agree6565


Total100100

Chart 40:Response regarding high working morale

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that 31% of the respondents strongly agree and 65% agree that they have high working morale. 3% of the respondents have no opinion and 1% of the respondent disagrees.Table 41:Response regarding recommending SIRF to others as a best place to work



2.Disagree55

3.Neutral11

4.Agree5959


Total100100

Chart 41:Response regarding recommending SIRF to others as a best place to work

Inference: From the above fact it is clear that majority of the respondents, about 35% strongly agree and 59% agree that they will recommend to others as a best place to work. 1% of the respondents have no opinion and 5% disagree.

Response regarding the strength of the organisation

Team work.

New ideas, Quality, Trust, Hard work and unity.

Achieving target

Safe working environment.

Trusting employees.

Excellent working environment.

Treat everybody as equal.

Producing quality products that meet customer requirements.

Employees valuable contribution.

Appropriate and relevant suggestions by superior.

Response regarding areas need improvement in the organization

Need to improve production department, SWDT and TPM, Milling department- mix store area.

Environment working condition.

Production capacity to be increased.

Need to improve manual operating system.

Need to find the cause for production loss.

Need to recruit people of high education qualification.OVERALL ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE

Objective:

To find the overall Organizational Climate level in the organization.Karl Pearsons standard deviation is applied to analysis the level of Organizational Climate in the organization.Table 42:

No of ResponseValues(X)(X-)(X-)2

11553.059.3025

2140-11.95142.8025

3142-9.9599.0025

41597.0549.7025

5148-3.9515.6025

6148-3.9515.6025

716513.05170.3025

81520.050.0025

916311.05122.1025

1017725.05627.5025

11118-33.951152.603

12143-8.9580.1025

131520.050.0025

141520.050.0025

151586.0536.6025

16144-7.9563.2025

17142-9.9599.0025

18138-13.95194.6025

19139-12.95167.7025

20147-4.9524.5025

2119038.051447.803

22150-1.953.8025

231542.054.2025

24151-0.950.9025

25146-5.9535.4025

2616614.05197.4025

27150-1.953.8025

28148-3.9515.6025

29150-1.953.8025

3016715.05226.5025

3117119.05362.9025

321586.0536.6025

33148-3.9515.6025

34146-5.9535.4025

3516614.05197.4025

3617321.05443.1025

3716816.05257.6025

3816816.05257.6025

391575.0525.5025

40126-25.95673.4025

41148-3.9515.6025

4216917.05290.7025

43150-1.953.8025

44129-22.95526.7025

45137-14.95223.5025

461520.050.0025

47149-2.958.7025

481520.050.0025

491520.050.0025

501520.050.0025

51147-4.9524.5025

521520.050.0025

531520.050.0025

5418028.05786.8025

5517321.05443.1025

561520.050.0025

571520.050.0025

581520.050.0025

591520.050.0025

601520.050.0025

61119-32.951085.703

6217624.05578.4025

631520.050.0025

6416311.05122.1025

651520.050.0025

661608.0564.8025

671553.059.3025

681619.0581.9025

6917018.0536.6025

70145-6.9536.6025

711564.0536.6025

7216412.0536.6025

73144-7.9536.6025

74145-6.9548.3025

75144-7.9563.2025

76149-2.958.7025

771586.0536.6025

78141-10.05119.9025

791531.051.1025

8016210.05101.0025

81136-15.95254.4025

82131-20.95433.9025

83138-13.95194.6025

84146-5.9535.4025

851520.050.0025

86144-7.9563.2025

87139-12.95167.7025

88137-14.95223.5025

89142-9.9599.0025

90145-6.9548.3025

91144-7.9563.2025

92148-3.9515.6025

9316614.05197.4025

9417624.05578.4025

9589-62.953962.703

9618432.051027.23

9718432.051027.23

98146-5.9535.4025

99145-6.9548.3025

100145-6.9548.3025

( = 15195(X-)2 = 21086.75

( = 15195/100 = 151.95 = = = =14.52No of RespondentsOrganizational ClimateTotal

LowModerateHigh

10077518100

Inference:

From the above table, it can be inferred that 18% of the respondents reveals high climate and 75% of the respondent reveals moderate climate and remaining 7% of the respondents reveals a very low climate in the organization.ANOVA Table 42.1:

Cross Tabulation for Environment and Climate:Objective To find out significant difference between working environment and organizational climate.H0: There is no significant difference between the working environment and climate in the organization.H1: There is a significant difference between the working environment and climate in the organization.ENVIRONMENTORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATETOTAL

LOWMODERATEHIGH

LOW1337

MODERATE667578

HIGH-51015

TOTAL77518100

X1X12X2X22X3X32

113939

636674489525

0052510100

73775452318134

STEP1: Total sum of all the items:

T = (X1+ (X2+ (X3 = 7+75+18 = 100 Correlation Factor = T2 / 9 = (100)2/9 = 1111.11.

STEP 2: Total sum of squares. = (X12 + (X22 + (X32 + (X42 C.F

= 37+ 4523+134 -1111.11

= 4694-1111.11

= 3582.85STEP 3: Sum of squares between varieties:

= (X1 2/N + (X22/N + (X32/N+ (X42/N - C.F

= (7)2/3 + (75)2/3 + (18)2/3 1111.11

= 1999.33-1111.11

= 888.22STEP 4: Sum of squares with in varieties: = Total sum of squares sum of squares between varieties

= 3582.85 888.22 = 2694.62ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE TABLE:Source of variation

Sum of SquaresDegrees of freedomVarianceValue of F

Between varieties

With in varieties

888.22

2694.62

3 1 = 2

9 3 = 6888.22/2 = 444.11

2694.62/6= 449.100.9888

F= Variance between varieties/ Variance with in varieties.

Tabulated F = 5.1433 [for degree of freedom V1 = 2, V2 = 6] Since calculated F is lesser than the tabulated, null hypothesis is accepted.

Inference:

The calculated value of F is lesser than the table value. Therefore the null hypothesis is accepted. This implies that there is no significant difference between the working environment and climate in the organization. Table 42.2:

Cross Tabulation for Team Work and Climate:Objective To find out the significant difference between team work and organizational climate.H0: There is no significant difference between the team work and climate in the organization.H1: There is a significant difference between the team work and climate in the organization.TEAM WORKORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATETOTAL

LOWMODERATEHIGH

LOW1--1

MODERATE674585

HIGH-11314

TOTAL77518100

X1X12X2X22X3X32

110000

636745475525

001113169

73775562518324


T = (X1 + (X2 + (X3 = 7+75+18 = 100 Correlation Factor = T2 / 9 = (100)2/9 = 1111.11.


= 37+ 5625+324 -1111.11

= 5998 - 1111.11


= (X12/N + (X22/N + (X32/N+ (X42/N - C.F

= (7)2/3 + (75)2/3 + (18)2/3 1111.11

= 1999.33-1111.11




Between varieties

With in varieties

888.22

3998.67

3 1 = 2

9 4 = 5888.22/2 = 444.11

3998.67/5= 799.730.5553



Inference:

The calculated value of F is lower than the table value. Therefore the null hypothesis is accepted. This implies that there is no significant difference between the team work and climate in the organization. Table 42.3:

Cross Tabulation for Management Effectiveness and Climate:Objective To find out the significant difference between management effectiveness and organizational climate.H0: There is no significant difference between management effectiveness and climate in the organization.H1: There is a significant difference between management effectiveness and climate in the organization.MANAGEMENT

EFFECTIVENESSORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATETOTAL

LOWMODERATEHIGH

LOW3--3

MODERATE467273

HIGH-81624

TOTAL77518100

X1X12X2X22X3X32

390000

41667448924

0086416256

72575455318260




= 25+ 4553+260 -1111.11

= 4838 - 1111.11


= (X12/N + (X22/N + (X32/N+ (X42/N - C.F

= (7)2/3 + (75)2/3 + (18)2/3 1111.11

= 1999.33-1111.11




Between varieties

With in varieties

888.22

2838.67

3 1 = 2

9 4 = 5888.22/2 = 444.11

2838.67/5= 567.730.7822



Inference:

The calculated value of F is lower than the table value. Therefore the null hypothesis is accepted. This implies that there is no significant difference between Management effectiveness and climate in the organization. Table 42.4:

Cross Tabulation for Employees Involvement and Climate:Objective To find out the significant difference between employees involvement and organizational climate.H0: There is no significant difference between employees involvement and climate in the organization.H1: There is a significant difference between employees involvement and climate in the organization.INVOLVEMENTORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATETOTAL

LOWMODERATEHIGH

LOW51-6

MODERATE267675

HIGH-71219

TOTAL77518100

X1X12X2X22X3X32

5251100

24674489636

0074912144

72975453918180




= 29+ 4539+180 -1111.11

= 4568 - 1111.11


= (X12/N + (X22/N + (X32/N+ (X42/N - C.F

= (7)2/3 + (75)2/3 + (18)2/3 1111.11

= 1999.33-1111.11




Between varieties

With in varieties

888.22

2568.67

3 1 = 2

9 4 = 5888.22/2 = 444.11

2568.67/5= 513.730.8644



Inference:

The calculated value of F is lower than the table value. Therefore the null hypothesis is accepted. This implies that there is no significant difference between employees involvement and climate in the organization. Table 42.5:

Cross Tabulation for Employees Reward & Recognition and Climate:Objective To find out the significant difference between employees reward and recognition and organizational climate.

H0: There is no significant difference between employees reward and recognition and climate in the organization.H1: There is a significant difference between employees reward and recognition and climate in the organization. REWARD AND

RECOGNITIONORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATETOTAL

LOWMODERATEHIGH

LOW63-9

MODERATE169979

HIGH-3912

TOTAL77518100

X1X12X2X22X3X32

6363900

11694761981

0039981

73775453918162




= 37+ 4779+162 -1111.11

= 4978 - 1111.11


= (X12/N + (X22/N + (X32/N+ (X42/N - C.F

= (7)2/3 + (75)2/3 + (18)2/3 1111.11

= 1999.33-1111.11




Between varieties

With in varieties

888.22

2978.67

3 1 = 2

9 4 = 5888.22/2 = 444.11

2978.67/5= 595.730.7454



Inference:

The calculated value of F is lower than the table value. Therefore the null hypothesis is accepted. This implies that there is no significant difference between employees reward and recognition and climate in the organization. Table 42.6:

Cross Tabulation for Employees Competency and Climate:Objective To find out the significant difference between employees competency and organizational climate.

H0: There is no significant difference between employees competency and climate in the organization.H1: There is a significant difference between employees competency and climate in the organization. COMPETENCYORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATETOTAL

LOWMODERATEHIGH

LOW22-4

MODERATE5611076

HIGH-12820

TOTAL77518100

X1X12X2X22X3X32

242400

52561372110100

0012144864

72975386918164




= 29+ 3869+164 -1111.11

= 4062 - 1111.11


= (X12/N + (X22/N + (X32/N+ (X42/N - C.F

= (7)2/3 + (75)2/3 + (18)2/3 1111.11

= 1999.33-1111.11




Between varieties

With in varieties

888.22

2062.67

3 1 = 2

9 4 = 5888.22/2 = 444.11

2062.67/5= 412.531.07655



Inference:

The calculated value of F is lower than the table value. Therefore the null hypothesis is accepted. This implies that there is no significant difference between employees competency and climate in the organization. Table 42.7:

Cross Tabulation for Employees Commitment and Climate:Objective To find out the significant difference between employees commitment and organizational climate.

H0: There is no significant difference between employees commitment and climate in the organization.H1: There is a significant difference between employees commitment and climate in the organization. COMMITMENTORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATETOTAL

LOWMODERATEHIGH

LOW4--4

MODERATE364471

HIGH-111425

TOTAL77518100

X1X12X2X22X3X32

4160000

39644096416

001112114196

72575421718212




= 25+ 4217+212 -1111.11

= 4454 - 1111.11


= (X12/N + (X22/N + (X32/N+ (X42/N - C.F

= (7)2/3 + (75)2/3 + (18)2/3 1111.11

= 1999.33-1111.11




Between varieties

With in varieties

888.22

2454.67

3 1 = 2

9 4 = 5888.22/2 = 444.11

2454.67/5= 490.930.8985



Inference:

The calculated value of F is lower than the table value. Therefore the null hypothesis is accepted. This implies that there is no significant difference between employees commitment and climate in the organization. F - TEST

TABLE 42.8:Overall Result: Dimensions Vs Organizational ClimateObjective:

To test the significance of the difference between Dimensions and Organizational Climate in the organization.DIMENSIONMEANSDF

Environment19.772.560.9888

Team Work24.925.750.5553

Management Effectiveness20.932.150.7822

Involvement19.342.560.8644

Rewards and Recognition19.522.680.7454

Competency22.342.431.0765

Commitment25.133.020.8985

Inference: From the above table, it is clear that there is no significant difference between the climate dimensions and the overall level of organizational climate.

FINDINGS Majority of the respondents, about 66% belong to the category of 3040 years of age.

Majority of the respondents educational qualification, about 45% belong to the category of SSLC and 30% belong to the category of12th standard.

Majority of the respondents, about 52% belong to the category of 10-15 years of work experience in the organization.

71% of the respondents reveal that they are working in a safe environment.

63% of the respondents reveal that their work area is clean and comfortable with necessary equipments.

70% of the respondents reveal that they maintain a good balance between work and other aspect of life.

72% of the respondents reveal that they are satisfied with the working conditions.

65% of the respondents reveal that they have flexibility to arrange work schedule to meet personal/family responsibilities.

75% of the respondents reveal that they receive help and support from the superior.

69% of the respondents reveal that they receive regular feedback from their superior.

72% of the respondents reveal that they work in team with the coworkers.

66% of the respondents reveal that their department communicates well with the other departments.

66% of the respondents reveal that their department makes a valuable contribution to the organization.

64% of the respondents reveal that their departments meet its customer requirements. 75% of the respondents reveal that management pays careful attention to their suggestion.

66% of the respondents reveal that they trust management. 68% of the respondents reveal that management understands what is going on in their department.

69% of the respondents reveal that they are treated with respect by the management.

74% of the respondents reveal that they wish to give suggestion for the development of the organization.

64% of the respondents reveal that management adequately inform to the department about what is going on in the organization.

74% of the respondents reveal that organization encourages them to develop improved work process.

62% of the respondents reveal that management seeks the involvement of employees in decision making.

61% of the respondents reveal that organization is sensitive towards their individual needs.

61% of the respondents reveal that they know what is happening in other department.

65% of the respondents that they are recognized for their good work.

77% of the respondents reveal that they receive appropriate feedback about their performance from the management.

70% of the respondents reveal that realistic work is expected by the management.

60% of the respondents reveal that their satisfaction with the level of pay and benefit they receive. 67% of the respondents reveal promotions are based on performance. 72% of the respondents reveal that they receive adequate job related training. 68% of the respondents reveal that they have skills to perform job effectively. 71% of the respondents reveal that training helps to improve performance. 50% of the respondents strongly disagree and 35% agree that they have stress in job.

75% of the respondents reveal that organization helps them to develop themselves and their career.

45% of the respondents strongly disagree and 38% agree that there work is overloaded.

75% of the respondents reveal that they are willing to put extra efforts. 67% of the respondents reveal that they are proud to work in SIRF. 65% of the respondents reveal that they are loyal to the organization. 67% of the respondents reveal that they plan to spend their entire career in the organization.

65% of the respondents reveal that they have high working morale. 35% of the respondents strongly agree and 59% of the respondents agree that they will recommend SIRF to others as a best place to work. From the study it is clear that 18% of the respondents reveals high climate and 75% of the respondent reveals moderate climate and remaining 7% of the respondents reveals a very low climate in the organization. From the study it is clear that there is no significant difference between working environment and organizational climate.

From the study it is clear that there is no significant difference between team work and organizational climate.

From the study it is clear that there is no significant difference between management effectiveness and organizational climate.

From the study it is clear that there is no significant difference between employees involvement and organizational climate.

From the study it is clear that there is no significant difference between rewards and recognition and organizational climate.

From the study it is clear that there is no significant difference between competency and organizational climate.

From the study it is clear that there is no significant difference between employees commitment and organizational climate.

SUGGESTIONS

The management provides sufficient training to employees. A few measures can be taken to develop and organize the training program. The employees works are been recognized by the management and appreciated. It can be maintained in such a way that the employees morale will be improved. Need to improve the environment of the working condition. A few measures can be taken to revise regarding pay and benefits. Team performance must be highly encouraged and recognized. Employees have a high trust in management. It can be maintained in such a way employees involvement and commitment will increase.

Employees are willing to give suggestions for the development of the organization. The suggestions given by the employee must be duly responded.

CONCLUSION

Climate is the atmosphere of the organization, a relatively enduring quality of the internal environment of an organization, which is experienced by its members and influences their behavior. Organizational climate may affect quality of service and employees commitment and involvement towards the organization. Climate dimensions in one way or other affect the level of organizational climate. It is need to be taken into account while evaluating the organizational effectiveness. Climate surveys are studies of employees' perceptions and perspectives of an organization. The surveys address attitudes and concerns that help the organization work with employees to instill positive changes. In general, they are aimed at all aspects of the employees' jobs. The study analyzes everything from an employee's workload to their relationships with coworkers and superiors to their salary to company policies and anything in between. The study shows that that there is no significant difference between culture dimensions and organizational climate.19

66

10

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

20 30 years

30 40 years

40 - 50 years

Above 50

Percentage

18

45

30

5

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Below SSLC

SSLC

XII

Diploma

Degree

Percentage

12

10

52

20

6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Below 10

5 10

10 15

15 20

Above 20

Percentage

4

4

0

71

21

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

8

4

63

25

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

2

1

3

70

24

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

3

7

1

72

17

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

18

4

65

13

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

1

1

2

75

21

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

1

9

69

21

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

0

1

72

27

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

6

6

66

22

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

1

1

24

66

28

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

1

0

2

68

29

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

0

1

75

24

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

1

1

66

32

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

2

4

68

26

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

2

4

69

25

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

1

2

2

74

21

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

2

4

29

64

20

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

3

3

74

20

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

1

4

15

62

18

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

14

12

61

13

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

1

4

22

61

12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

4

6

65

25

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

1

4

3

77

15

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

2

10

70

18

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

3

17

3

60

17

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

1

9

10

67

13

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

2

5

3

72

18

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

0

4

68

28

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

4

14

71

21

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

1

50

5

35

9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

2

5

75

18

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

2

45

10

38

5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

1

1

2

75

21

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

1

2

67

30

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

1

3

65

31

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

3

21

67

29

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

1

3

65

31

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

0

5

1

59

35

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Percentage

PAGE 29

_1269663632.unknown

_1269832977.unknown

_1269838513.unknown

_1269838630.unknown

_1269663633.unknown

_1269663629.unknown

organzation climate.doc

Documents

Transcript of organzation climate.doc