Organizational diagnosis

36
DCE 5632 ORGANIZATIONAL DIAGNOSIS PUGANESHWARI D/O AKAMBARAM (GS 26998) HEMALATHA d/o KRISHNAN (GS 27748) VIDHUBALA D/O BALASEGAR (GS 27947) Roohangiz Karimi (GS 28300)

description

 

Transcript of Organizational diagnosis

Page 1: Organizational diagnosis

DCE 5632ORGANIZATIONAL

DIAGNOSIS

PUGANESHWARI D/O AKAMBARAM (GS 26998)

HEMALATHA d/o KRISHNAN (GS 27748)

VIDHUBALA D/O BALASEGAR (GS 27947)

Roohangiz Karimi (GS 28300)

Page 2: Organizational diagnosis

INTRODUCTION Organizational diagnosis includes the compilation of information on the

organization and its employees, the interrelations between the employees and the organization, and the manner in which the organization is perceived by management and employees.

Organizational diagnosis reflects the organizational portrait at various dimensions (longitudinal and latitudinal) and it can be applied toward the definition of goals and objectives within the process of organizational change and development. The diagnostic process is the first stage toward realizing the goals of the organization managers in the implementation of change and introduction of innovation.

The organizational diagnosis utilizes existing models and others, which were developed by the Company. The tool used in order to perform the diagnosis is adjusted to the needs specified by the organization. In any event of organizational diagnosis, the Company also addresses functional dimensions of the organization, such as: defining the organization's mission, structure, position holders, as well as symbolic dimensions, such as rituals and their significance, special terminology, etc.

Page 3: Organizational diagnosis

DEFINITION

Organization Diagnosis(OD) determine ‘what is’ and ‘what could’ it seeks way to bridge the gap. It consists of planning to collect data,data collection ,analysis feedback to the organization, it for the basis for determine subsequent intervention (action planning and action taking).

The diagnosis can focus on the organization overall or on specific aspect such as organization culture(Roger & Byham 1994) or aspect of diversity (Harrison & Shirom 1999).They also suggest that one ’’start with abroad scan of an organization challenges but close up examination (p 18)

Page 4: Organizational diagnosis

Diagnosis Models.

DESCRIPTIVE MODELS

• With descriptive models, the role of the OD practitioner is to illuminate “what is” for the client, and “what could be”.

• The client determines the direction of change and the OD practitioner helps the client get there.

• Most diagnostic models fit under the “descriptive” category. Examples include:

Bolman and Deal: Four Frames Model Freedman: Socio-technical Systems Model Galbraith: Star Model Hornstein and Tichy: Emergent Pragmatic Model McKinsey: 7-S Model Nadler and Tushman: Congruence Mode

Page 5: Organizational diagnosis

NORMATIVE MODELS

• With normative models, the practitioner recommends specific directions for change, prior to the diagnosis – the “one best way of managing.” Examples include:

Blake and Mouton’s Grid [Concern for People/Concern for Productivity 9, 9].

Likert’s Profiles Organizational

• Theorists and consultants have developed a wide variety of models identifying important organizational elements and their interrelationships.

• Each is predicated on a particular theory/theories or perspective(s), and each intended to highlight and bring into focus a broad range of data and experience for purposes of diagnosis and intervention

Page 6: Organizational diagnosis

• Most of the models suggest interaction or interrelationships among all the selected variables.

• Many of the same variables are contained in all the models, although not necessarily in the same way or with the same emphasis

Page 7: Organizational diagnosis

MODELS OF ORGANIZATION DIAGNOSISS

IX

BOX

MODEL

Page 8: Organizational diagnosis

o Gaps between what exists now and what ought to be

ofor each of these boxes consultants are encouraged to diagnose the following gaps

o Between what is actually done and what employees and say that they do

o Gaps among organizational units and layers

o The leadership is in the center and connected to the five factors because leaders play critical role in the organization effectiveness

Page 9: Organizational diagnosis

THE 7-S MCKINSEY MODEL

Page 10: Organizational diagnosis

McKinsey Consulting developed a model for looking at organizations. The 7 S’sModel provides an especially useful framework for reviewing the impact of change:-

oShared Values and Beliefs: A role of the vision statement is to impart to the organization (and externally) what the organization stands for and what it believes in.

oStrategy: States how an organization will attain its vision and respond to the threats and opportunities of the new mediums. Capabilities are needed in:marketing, distribution, product and service development, business requirementsanalysis; creation and management of alliances & partnerships.

oSystems, including Processes: Capabilities are required in: IT & IS, sales and service, legal, actuarial.

oStaff: HR management for developing the skills and aptitude for building lifetime customer relationships. Needed are policies, standards and processes re: recruitment, training & development, motivation & regards.

Page 11: Organizational diagnosis

o Style: This refers to the management style best suited for the organization. Thechallenge for management is to use appropriate styles for the situation without

confusing staff.

o Structure: Organizations will find that changes to processes and style inevitablyrequire changes to their structure. (e.g. centralized, decentralized, network,matrix, process structures.)

o Skills: The degree to which necessary skills exist is the core of workforceplanning and often a major aspect in organization diagnosis. If staff andmanagers are to acquire all the skills outlined above, then there needs to be an

appropriate learning environment.

Page 12: Organizational diagnosis

THE BURKE-LITWIN MODEL

Page 13: Organizational diagnosis

o This model shows the causal changes between 12 key areas

o Can be used to learn which organizational variables to change and why

o can be used to analyze , diagnose and even predict the effects of change throughout an organization

o Burke believes that organizational change stems from environmental impact than from any other factor.

o External environment, mission and strategy, leadership and organizational culture as the primary levers for change

o The remaining elements are used as levers for fine tuning and improving the existing behavior

Page 14: Organizational diagnosis

BOLMAN & DEAL FOUR MODEL

Page 15: Organizational diagnosis

o Structural – the rational, tough-minded side of organizations … clarifyingbasic issues in organization design … the relationship between goals andstructure organizations.

o Human resource – the human side of enterprise … examines strengths and weaknesses of

current approaches to humanizing the workplace.

o Political – the darker side of organizations – conflict, coalitions, andstruggles for power and positions.

o Symbolic – organizational symbols … explains the roles played by myths, rituals,

ceremonies, and plays at all levels of the organizations.

Page 16: Organizational diagnosis

FORM OF DIAGNOSIS OPEN SYSTEM

• Organization is a complex and open: their boundaries and environments influence

them.

• Each subsystem works interdependently where if one subsystem is affected all other

subsystem affected as well.

Diagram adapted from Jones, B. B., & Brazzel, M. (2006)

Boundary

Environment

Input Throughput Output

SupplierFundingGovt. RegulationShareholders

Transformational work processes

CustomerClientInvestors

Page 17: Organizational diagnosis

Advantages:

Help consultants and clients deal with the complexity of organization

performance and change.

Resist the temptation of management fads.

Enables focus on all aspects of the organization, not only on comfortable

parts.

Harrison, M. I., & Shirom, A. (1999).

Page 18: Organizational diagnosis

ISSUES IN DIAGNOSIS

PERCEPTUAL BIAS

• It means biased against or for something based on your sensory inputs (sight, most

likely,

but could also be touch, smell, taste, or hearing).

• Being aware of possible causes of bias is the first step in widening the view to take in

more data.

• Anyone involved in organizational diagnosis must be aware of their own mental

models,

beliefs, heuristics and other factors which actually can distort the decision making.

Jones, B. B., & Brazzel, M. (2006)

Page 19: Organizational diagnosis

ISSUES IN DIAGNOSIS cont.

PERCEPTUAL BIAS cont.

• In short;

One shouldn’t jump into assumptions.

Keep mind open.

To be aware of what not naturally one aware.

Pay attention to “what is not” and also “ what is” during the diagnosis

process.

Jones, B. B., & Brazzel, M. (2006)

Page 20: Organizational diagnosis

ISSUES IN DIAGNOSIS cont.

DIVERSITY AT WORKPLACE

• Employees are more culturally diverse and more different in gender ratio.

• In diagnosis, it is important to take in account the gender, race, ethnicity and many

more

that exist in an organization.

• However, in the process of diagnosis, combining data from different countries must be

avoided.

• The results which are highly influenced by culture; if combined much of the individual

richness will be “averaged” out. (Johnson, R. H. 1996)

Jones, B. B., & Brazzel, M. (2006)

Page 21: Organizational diagnosis

PHASES IN DIAGNOSIS

Jones, B. B., & Brazzel, M. (2006)

Determine approach to Determine approach to be usedbe used

Announce projectAnnounce project

Prepare for data Prepare for data collectioncollection

Collect dataCollect data

Do data analysis and Do data analysis and presentationpresentation

Page 22: Organizational diagnosis

CHANGE PROCESS

Unfreez Refreeze

Stability

Change

CHANGE PROCESSAdapted from Kurt Lewin’s Model

New behaviorModifying attitudeTraining managers & employees

Desired Situation

Undesired Situation

Page 23: Organizational diagnosis

THE MODEL

First stage represents the status quo which is unfreeze.

Second stage attempts to install the change.

Third stage is refreezing desired change.

Page 24: Organizational diagnosis

• Action Planning and Transition Management- plans are developed for closing the gap between the current and desired state and the means by which the transition will be managed.

• Measuring the Change— you know where you are in the change process and the level of success achieved.

• Organizational analysis: to understand the forces for change and the reasons why the organization is performing as it currently does.

• Why Change—the need for change is determined and the nature of the change

• Analysis Gap—The identification of the distance between the desired future state and the present state

Page 25: Organizational diagnosis

RED FLAG A red flag means a pattern, practice or

specific activity that indicates the possible existence of identity theft

Identify theft means fraud committed or attempted using the identifying information of another person without authority

Page 26: Organizational diagnosis

PROGRAM REQUIREMENT

“Financial institutions” and “creditors” with covered accounts” must implement a written Identity Theft Prevention Program to detect, prevent, and mitigate identity theft in connection with:

• the opening of a covered account, or• any existing covered account

Page 27: Organizational diagnosis

must include policies and procedures to:

•Identify relevant red flags into the Program

•Detect red flags that are part of the Program

•Respond appropriately to any red flags that are detected

•Ensure the Program is updated periodically to address changing risks

Page 28: Organizational diagnosis

Categories of Red Flags

Consumer Report alerts

Presentation of suspicious documents

Presentation of suspicious personal id information

Suspicious activity on the account

Notice of possible id theft on account

IDENTIFY RELEVANT RED FLAG

Page 29: Organizational diagnosis

Procedures to detect red flags:-

Verify identity (new accounts)

Authenticate customers (existing)

Monitor transactions (existing)

Verify validity of address changes (existing)

DETECT RED FLAG

Page 30: Organizational diagnosis

Periodic updating of the Program

Changes in methods of id theft;

Changes in methods to detect, prevent and mitigate id theft

Changes in types of accounts offered or maintained.

Changes in business arrangements, services providers, etc.

RED FLAG PROGRAM

Page 31: Organizational diagnosis

Appropriate Responses to Red Flags

Monitor accounts

Contact customer

Change passwords

Close and reopen account

Refuse to open account

RESPONDING TO RED FLAG

Page 32: Organizational diagnosis

RED FLAGS IN DIAGNOSIS Confidentiality of the data:-

The over diagnosis

many problems are identified that the diagnosis becomes a rule of continual analysis.

The crisis diagnosis

Attending only to the immediate, short term crisis.Important but less visible problems are misses.

Page 33: Organizational diagnosis

The threatening or overwhelming diagnosis•The client is confronted by problems to the extent that therelationship with the practitioner is damaged.

•It is difficult for the client to accept so much information anddeal with it in any meaningful way.

The practitioner’s favorite diagnosis•The practitioner imposes a special diagnosis regardless ofthe problem.

•The diagnosis may be made to fit the practitioner’s ownspecial skill areas.

The diagnosis of symptom

Page 34: Organizational diagnosis

CONCLUSION

• Organization diagnosis is critical to the organization development process. By gathering the organization information the practitioner is often able to help the client see the organization challenge. This phase and model of organization model creates an organization process system well

Page 35: Organizational diagnosis

REFERENCES Jones, B. B., & Brazzel, M. (2006). The NTL handbook of organization

development and change: Principles, practices, and perspectives. Pfeiffer & Co.

Harrison, M. I., & Shirom, A. (1999). Organizational diagnosis and assessment: Bridging theory and practice. Sage Publications, Inc.

Johnson, R. H. (1996). Life in the consortium: The Mayflower group. Organizational surveys: Tools for assessment and change, 285–309.

Diagnosing Organizations With Impact Kaye Craft & Arty Trost March 29-April 1, 2004

Page 36: Organizational diagnosis

THANK YOU