Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

36
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. Personality Personality and and Values Values Chapter FOUR

Transcript of Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

Page 1: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Personality Personality

and and

ValuesValues

Chapter FOUR

Page 2: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

What is Personality?What is Personality?

Personality

The sum total of ways in which an individual reacts and interacts with others; measurable traits a person exhibits.

Personality Traits

Enduring characteristics that describe an individual’s behavior.

Personality

Determinants

• Heredity

• Environment

• Situation

Personality

Determinants

• Heredity

• Environment

• Situation

Page 3: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

The Myers-Briggs Type IndicatorThe Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

Personality Types

• Extroverted vs. Introverted (E or I)

• Sensing vs. Intuitive (S or N)

• Thinking vs. Feeling (T or F)

• Judging vs. Perceiving (P or J)

Score is a combination of all four (e.g., ENTJ)

Personality Types

• Extroverted vs. Introverted (E or I)

• Sensing vs. Intuitive (S or N)

• Thinking vs. Feeling (T or F)

• Judging vs. Perceiving (P or J)

Score is a combination of all four (e.g., ENTJ)

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)

A personality test that taps four characteristics and classifies people into 1 of 16 personality types.

Page 4: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Meyers-Briggs, ContinuedMeyers-Briggs, Continued

A Meyers-Briggs score– Can be a valuable too for self-awareness and

career guidance

BUT– Should not be used as a selection tool because

it has not been related to job performance!!!

Page 5: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

The Big Five Model of Personality DimensionsThe Big Five Model of Personality Dimensions

ExtroversionSociable, gregarious, and assertive

AgreeablenessGood-natured, cooperative, and trusting.

ConscientiousnessResponsible, dependable, persistent, and organized.

Openness to ExperienceCurious, imaginative, artistic, and sensitive

Emotional StabilityCalm, self-confident, secure under stress (positive), versus nervous, depressed, and insecure under stress (negative).

Page 6: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Measuring PersonalityMeasuring Personality

Personality is Measured By

Self-report surveys Observer-rating surveys Projective measures

– Rorschach Inkblot Test – Thematic Apperception

Test

Page 7: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Major Personality Attributes Influencing OBMajor Personality Attributes Influencing OB

Core Self-evaluation

– Self-esteem

– Locus of Control

Machiavellianism

Narcissism

Self-monitoring

Risk taking

Type A vs. Type B personality

Proactive Personality

Page 8: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Core Self-Evaluation: Two Main ComponentsCore Self-Evaluation: Two Main Components

•Self Esteem

Individuals’ degree of liking or disliking themselves.

•Locus of Control

The degree to which people believe they are masters of their own fate.

•Internals (Internal locus of control) Individuals who believe that they control what happens to them. •Externals (External locus of control)Individuals who believe that what happens to them is controlled by outside forces such as luck or chance.

Page 9: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

MachiavellianismMachiavellianism

Conditions Favoring High Machs

• Direct interaction with others

• Minimal rules and regulations

• Emotions distract for others

Conditions Favoring High Machs

• Direct interaction with others

• Minimal rules and regulations

• Emotions distract for others

Machiavellianism (Mach)

Degree to which an individual is pragmatic, maintains emotional distance, and believes that ends can justify means.

Page 10: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

NarcissismNarcissism

A Narcissistic Person

•Has grandiose sense of self-importance

•Requires excessive admiration

•Has a sense of entitlement

•Is arrogant

•Tends to be rated as less effective

Page 11: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Self-Monitoring Self-Monitoring

Self-Monitoring

A personality trait that measures an individual’s ability to adjust his or her behavior to external, situational factors.

High Self-Monitors

• Receive better performance ratings

• Likely to emerge as leaders

• Show less commitment to their organizations

High Self-Monitors

• Receive better performance ratings

• Likely to emerge as leaders

• Show less commitment to their organizations

Page 12: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Risk-TakingRisk-Taking

High Risk-taking Managers– Make quicker decisions– Use less information to make decisions– Operate in smaller and more entrepreneurial

organizations Low Risk-taking Managers

– Are slower to make decisions– Require more information before making decisions– Exist in larger organizations with stable

environments Risk Propensity

– Aligning managers’ risk-taking propensity to job requirements should be beneficial to organizations.

Page 13: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Personality TypesPersonality TypesType A’s1. are always moving, walking, and eating rapidly;2. feel impatient with the rate at which most events take place;3. strive to think or do two or more things at once;4. cannot cope with leisure time;5. are obsessed with numbers, measuring their success in

terms of how many or how much of everything they acquire.

Type B’s1. never suffer from a sense of time urgency with its

accompanying impatience;2. feel no need to display or discuss either their achievements

or accomplishments;3. play for fun and relaxation, rather than to exhibit their

superiority at any cost;4. can relax without guilt.

Page 14: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Personality TypesPersonality Types

Proactive Personality

Identifies opportunities, shows initiative, takes action, and perseveres until meaningful change occurs.

Creates positive change in the environment, regardless or even in spite of constraints or obstacles.

Page 15: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Which of the following is not a typical

personality trait considered to be

organizationally relevant?

Locus of controlLocus of control

Self-monitoringSelf-monitoring

Self-enhancingSelf-enhancing

Self esteemSelf esteem

Machiavellianism Machiavellianism

Chapter Check-Up: Personality

Discuss with your neighbor how each of the three traits above would

influence a college instructor’s behavior, and where you think your

teacher falls with respect to each of them.

Page 16: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Chapter Check-Up: Personality

Alison arrives to class and realizes that she’s Alison arrives to class and realizes that she’s

forgotten her homework to turn in. She says “Oh forgotten her homework to turn in. She says “Oh

man, it’s just not my lucky day today.” Alison man, it’s just not my lucky day today.” Alison

has ______________.has ______________.

Alison has a high external locus of control. Alison believes that

things outside of her control determine what happens.

If Alison works on a team with you, and you have a very

high internal locus of control, what kinds of discussions

do you think the two of you might have? Discuss with a

friend.

Page 17: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Julia is known for being a go-getter. She never leaves a task

incomplete, and is involved in a number of activities. Moreover,

she’s at the top of her class. She’s so busy that sometimes,

she forgets to stop and eat lunch. Julia can be easily

characterized as someone that has/is a Type ____ Personality.

Chapter Check-Up: Personality

A

Page 18: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Julia is also likely to not be very

• Happy?

• Fun?

• Creative?

• Stressed?

Chapter Check-Up: Personality

In general, Type A’s are rarely creative because they generally don’t allocate the necessary time for new solution development; they usually rely on past experiences to solve problems in order to be speedy.

Page 19: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Definition: Mode of conduct or end state is personally or socially preferable (i.e., what is right & good)– Terminal Values

• Desirable End States

– Instrumental Values• The ways/means for achieving one’s terminal values

Value System: A hierarchy based on a ranking of an individual’s values in terms of their intensity.

Note: Values Vary by Cohort

ValuesValues

Page 20: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Importance of ValuesImportance of Values

Provide understanding of the attitudes, motivation, and behaviors of individuals and cultures.

Influence our perception of the world around us.

Represent interpretations of “right” and “wrong.”

Imply that some behaviors or outcomes are preferred over others.

Page 21: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Types of Values –- Rokeach Value SurveyTypes of Values –- Rokeach Value Survey

Terminal Values

Desirable end-states of existence; the goals that a person would like to achieve during his or her lifetime.

Instrumental Values

Preferable modes of behavior or means of achieving one’s terminal values.

Page 22: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Values in the

RokeachSurvey

Values in the

RokeachSurvey

E X H I B I T 4-3E X H I B I T 4-3

Source: M. Rokeach, The Nature of Human Values (New York: The Free Press, 1973).

Page 23: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Values in the

Rokeach Survey(cont’d)

Values in the

Rokeach Survey(cont’d)

E X H I B I T 4-3 (cont’d)E X H I B I T 4-3 (cont’d)

Source: M. Rokeach, The Nature of Human Values (New York: The Free Press, 1973).

Page 24: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Mean Value Rankings of Executives, Union

Members, and Activists

Mean Value Rankings of Executives, Union

Members, and Activists

E X H I B I T 4-4E X H I B I T 4-4

Source: Based on W. C. Frederick and J. Weber, “The Values of Corporate Managers and Their Critics: An Empirical Description and Normative Implications,” in W. C. Frederick and L. E. Preston (eds.) Business Ethics: Research Issues and Empirical Studies (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1990), pp. 123–44.

Page 25: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Values, Loyalty, and Ethical BehaviorValues, Loyalty, and Ethical Behavior

Ethical Climate inEthical Climate inthe Organizationthe Organization

Ethical Climate inEthical Climate inthe Organizationthe Organization

Ethical Values and Ethical Values and Behaviors of Behaviors of

LeadersLeaders

Page 26: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Power Distance Individualism vs. Collectivism Masculinity vs. Femininity Uncertainty Avoidance Long-term and Short-term orientation

Values across Cultures: Hofstede’s Framework

Values across Cultures: Hofstede’s Framework

Page 27: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Hofstede’s Framework for Assessing CulturesHofstede’s Framework for Assessing Cultures

Power Distance

The extent to which a society accepts that power in institutions and organizations is distributed unequally.

Low distance: relatively equal power between those with status/wealth and those without status/wealth

High distance: extremely unequal power distribution between those with status/wealth and those without status/wealth

Page 28: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Hofstede’s Framework (cont’d)Hofstede’s Framework (cont’d)

Collectivism

A tight social framework in which people expect others in groups of which they are a part to look after them and protect them.

Individualism

The degree to which people prefer to act as individuals rather than a member of groups.

Vs.

Page 29: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Hofstede’s Framework (cont’d)Hofstede’s Framework (cont’d)

Masculinity

The extent to which the society values work roles of achievement, power, and control, and where assertiveness and materialism are also valued.

Femininity

The extent to which there is little differentiation between roles for men and women.

Vs.

Page 30: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Hofstede’s Framework (cont’d)Hofstede’s Framework (cont’d)

Uncertainty Avoidance

The extent to which a society feels threatened by uncertain and ambiguous situations and tries to avoid them.

•High Uncertainty Avoidance: Society does not like ambiguous situations & tries to avoid them.

•Low Uncertainty Avoidance: Society does not mind ambiguous situations & embraces them.

Page 31: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Hofstede’s Framework (cont’d)Hofstede’s Framework (cont’d)

Long-term Orientation

A national culture attribute that emphasizes the future, thrift, and persistence.

Short-term Orientation

A national culture attribute that emphasizes the present and the here and now.

Vs.

Page 32: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Achieving Person-Job FitAchieving Person-Job Fit

Personality Types

• Realistic

• Investigative

• Social

• Conventional

• Enterprising

• Artistic

Personality Types

• Realistic

• Investigative

• Social

• Conventional

• Enterprising

• Artistic

Personality-Job Fit Theory (Holland)

Identifies six personality types and proposes that the fit between personality type and occupational environment determines satisfaction and turnover.

Page 33: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Holland’s Typology of Personality

andCongruent

Occupations

Holland’s Typology of Personality

andCongruent

Occupations

E X H I B I T 4–8E X H I B I T 4–8

Page 34: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Relationships among

Occupational Personality

Types

Relationships among

Occupational Personality

Types

E X H I B I T 4–9E X H I B I T 4–9

Source: Reprinted by special permission of the publisher, Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., from Making Vocational Choices, copyright 1973, 1985, 1992 by Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 35: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Organizational Culture Profile (OCP)Organizational Culture Profile (OCP)

Useful for determining person-organization fit

Survey that forces choices/rankings of one’s personal values

Helpful for identifying most important values to look for in an organization (in efforts to create a good fit)

Page 36: Organizational behaviour chapter 04 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

In Country J most of the top management team meets

employees at the local bar for a beer on Fridays, and there

are no reserved parking spaces. Everyone is on a first

name basis with each other. Country J, according to

Hofstede’s Framework, is probably low on what dimension?

Chapter Check-Up: Values

• CollectivismCollectivism

• Long Term OrientationLong Term Orientation

• Uncertainty AvoidanceUncertainty Avoidance

• Power DistancePower Distance

How would a College or University in Country J differ from your

College or University? Identify 3 differences and discuss with a

neighbor.