Organizational Behavior Chapter 9
-
Upload
dr-john-v-padua-cssgb-pmp-mba-dbm -
Category
Business
-
view
2.130 -
download
4
Transcript of Organizational Behavior Chapter 9
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
10-1
Chapter 10
Understanding Work Teams
Essentials of Organizational Behavior
12eStephen P. Robbins & Timothy A. Judge
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
After studying this chapter,
you should be able to:1. Contrast groups and teams, and analyze the
growing popularity of using teams in organizations.
2. Compare and contrast four types of teams.3. Identify the characteristics of effective teams.4. Show how organizations can create team
players.5. Decide when to use individuals instead of teams.6. Show how our understanding of teams differs in
a global context. 10-2
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Why Are Teams So Popular?
Increased competition forced restructuring for efficiency and effectiveness
Teams: Better utilize employee talents Are more flexible and responsive to change Democratize and motivate
10-3
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Groups and Teams Work group: Interacts
primarily to share information and to make decisions to help one another perform within each member’s area of responsibility
Work team: Generates positive synergy through coordinated effort; individual efforts result in a level of performance that is greater than the sum of those individual inputs
10-4
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Comparing Work Groups and Work Teams
10-5
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Four Types of Teams
10-6
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Problem-Solving Teams Members often from
the same department Share ideas or suggest
improvements Rarely given authority
to unilaterally implement any of their suggested actions
10-7
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Self-Managed Work Teams10-15 employees in highly-related jobsTeam takes on supervisory responsibilities:
Work planning and scheduling Assigning tasks Operating decisions/actions Working with customers
May select and evaluate membersEffectiveness is dependent on the situation
10-8
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Cross-Functional TeamsMembers from same level, but diverse
areas within and between organizationsExchange informationDevelop new ideas and solve problemsCoordinate complex projectsDevelopment may be time-consuming
due to complexity and diversity
10-9
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Virtual Teams Computer
technology ties dispersed team together
Special challenges Less social rapport More task-oriented Members less
satisfied10-10
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Key Components of Effective Teams
Context Composition Process
10-11
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Contextual ComponentsPresence of adequate resourcesEffective leadership and structureClimate of trust in the teamPerformance evaluation and reward
system that reflects team contributions
10-12
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Team Composition Components
Abilities of members Technical expertise Problem-solving Interpersonal
Personality Conscientious and open-
minded Allocation of roles Diversity of members
Cultural differences Size of teams Member preferences 10-13
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Process Components Common plan and
purpose Specific goals Team efficacy Common mental
models Low levels of
conflict Minimized social
loafing 10-14
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Turning Individuals into Team Players
Selection: Need employees who have the interpersonal as well as technical skills
Training: Workshops on problem-solving, communications, negotiation, conflict-management and coaching skills
Rewards: Encourage cooperative efforts rather than individual ones
10-15
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Teams Aren’t Always the Answer: Three Tests
Complexity of Work: Can the work be done better by more than one person?
Common Purpose: Does the work create a common purpose or set of goals for the people in the group that is more than the aggregate of individual goals?
Interdependence: Are the members of the group interdependent?
10-16