ORDER NO. 12 - Election Commission of India – Dudu (SC) 1. Tehsil Dudu 2. Tehsil Phagi (Partly)...

8

To Be Published In An Extraordinary Issue of TheGazette of India, Part II Section 3(iii) Dated 8th

August, 2005. To be published In An Extraordinary Issue of theState Gazette Dated 8th August, 2005.

F.No.282/RJ/2005 Dated: 8th August, 2005 17 Sravana, 1927(Saka)

ORDER NO. 12 In pursuance of Section 8 read with Section 4 of the Delimitation Act, 2002 (33 of

2002), and having regard to all other relevant Constitutional and statutory provisions in

this regard, the Delimitation Commission hereby determines –

a) the total number of seats to be allocated to the State of Rajasthan in the

House of the People as Twenty five(25);

b) of the total number of Twenty five (25); seats so allocated to the State of

Rajasthan in the House of the People, the number of seats to be reserved for

the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes as Four (4) and Three (3)

respectively;

c) the total number of seats to be assigned to the Legislative Assembly of the

State of Rajasthan, as two hundred (200);

d) of the total number of two hundred (200) seats so assigned to the Legislative

Assembly of the State of Rajasthan, the number of seats to be reserved for

the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes as Thirty four (34) and

Twenty five (25) respectively.

By Order,

(SHANGARA RAM) SECRETARY

To Be Published In An Extraordinary Issue of TheGazette of India, Part II Section 3(iii) Dated 8th August, h2005. To be published In An Extraordinary Issue of theRajasthan State Gazette Dated 8th August, 2005.
. F.No. 282/RJ/2005 Dated: 8th August, 2005 17 Sravana, 1927(Saka)
NOTIFICATION

No. 282/ RJ/2005 - In pursuance of sub-section (2) of Section 9 of the Delimitation Act, 2002

(33 of 2002), the Delimitation Commission hereby publishes its proposals for the delimitation of

Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies in the State of Rajasthan, together with the

dissenting proposals of the Associate Members, and specifies 23rd August, 2005(Tuesday) as

the date on or after which the proposals will be further considered by it.

2. Any objections or suggestions in regard to these proposals should reach the Secretary, Delimitation Commission, Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi-110001, on or

before the said date.

PROPOSALS (i) The territorial constituencies into which the State of Rajasthan shall be divided for

the purpose of elections to (a) the Legislative Assembly of the State, and (b) the

House of the People, the extent of each such constituency and the constituencies in

which the seats are reserved for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes shall

be as shown in the Table-A and Table-B respectively;

(ii) Where the name of a constituency as shown in Table A or Table B is distinguished

by the brackets and letters (SC), the seat in that constituency is reserved for the

Scheduled Castes; and

(iii) Where the name of a constituency as shown in Table-A or Table-B is distinguished

by the brackets and letters (ST), the seat in that constituency is reserved for the

Scheduled Tribes.

(Here print the matter attached) By Order,

(SHANGARA RAM) SECRETARY

TABLE - A ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES AND THEIR PROPOSED EXTENT

S. No. & Name of Assembly

Extent

Constituency

1-DISTRICT GANGANAGAR1 – Sadulsahar 1. Tehsil Sadulsahar 2. Tehsil Ganganagar (Partly) (I) ILRC

Mirzewala (II) ILRC Hindumalkot (III) ILRC Shivpur (IV) ILRC Ram Nagar (V) ILRC Chunawarh (VI) ILRC Ganganagar (Partly)- (i) PC Chak Maharaj Ka

2- Ganganagar Teshil Ganganagar (Partly) – (I) ILRC Ganganagar including Municipal Council Gangangar but excluding PC Chak Maharaj Ka (II) ILRC Burjwali (III) ILRC Netewala

3 - Karanpur 1. Tehsil Karanpur 2. Tehsil Padampur 4 - Suratgarh 1. Tehsil Suratgarh 2.Tehsil Vijaynagar (Partly) – ILRC

Jaitsar 5 - Raisinghnagar (SC)

1. Tehsil Raisinghnagar 2.Tehsil Vijaynagar (Partly) – (I) ILRC Sri Vijaynagar including Vijaynagar Municipal Board (II) ILRC Kunplee (III) ILRC 40 GB (IV) ILRC 8STB, (V) ILRC 12GB 3. Tehsil Anupgarh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Salempura (II) ILRC Banda Colony

6 - Anupgarh (SC) 1. Tehsil Gharsana 2. Tehsil Anupgarh excluding ILRC Salempura & ILRC Banda Colony

2-DISTRICT HANUMANGARH7 - Sangaria 1. Tehsil Sangaria 2. Tehsil Tibi 8 – Hanumangarh 1. Tehsil Hanumangarh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Hanumangarh

including Municipal Board Hanumangarh (II) ILRC Roranwali (III) ILRC Pucca Sarnan (IV) ILRC Fatehgarh (V) ILRC Lakhuwali (VI) ILRC Norangdesar

9 – Pilibanga (SC) 1. Tehsil Pilibanga 2. Tehsil Rawatsar (Partly) – (I) ILRC Rawatsar including Municipal Board Rawatsar (II) ILRC Khoda (III) ILRC Gandheli 3. Tehsil Hanumagnarh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Dablirathan

10 – Nohar 1. Tehsil Nohar (Partly) – (I) ILRC Nohar including Municipal Board Nohar (II) ILRC Deidas (III) ILRC Gorkhana (IV) ILRC Phephana (V) ILRC Meghana (VI) ILRC Jabrasar, 2. Tehsil Rawatsar (Partly) – (I) ILRC Baramsar (II) ILRC Pallu

11 - Bhadra 1. Tehsil Bhadra 2. Tehsil Nohar (Partly) – (I) ILRC Ramgarh 3-DISTRICT BIKANER

12 – Khajuwala (SC) 1. Tehsil Khajuwala 2. Teshil Poogal, 3. Tehsil Chhatargarh, 4. Tehsil Bikaner (Partly) – (I) ILRC Bikaner (Partly) – (i) PC Chak Garbi (Rural) (ii) PC Nalbari (iii) PC Udasar

13 – Bikaner West 1. Tehsil Bikaner (Partly) - (I) Municipal Council Bikaner (Partly) – Ward No. 1 to 4, 14 to 19, 21, 29 to 35, 44 to 49 and 53 to 55 (II) ILRC Bikaner (Partly) – (i) PC Karmisar

14 – Bikaner East 1. Tehsil Bikaner (Partly) - (I) Municipal Council Bikaner (Partly) - Ward No. 5 to 13, 20, 22 to 28, 36 to 43 and 50 to 52 (II) ILRC Bikaner (Partly) – (i) PC Bikaner (Rural) (ii) PC Gangasahar (Rural)

15 – Kolayat 1. Tehsil Kolayat, 2. Tehsil Bikaner (Partly) – (I) ILRC Deshnoke including Municipal Board Deshnoke

16 – Lunkaransar 1. Tehsil Lunkaransar, 2. Tehsil Bikaner (Partly) – (I) ILRC

Jamsar (II) ILRC Napasar (III) ILRC Bikaner (Partly) – (i) PC Ridmalsar Purohitan

17 – Dungargarh 1. Tehsil Dungargarh 2. Tehsil Nokha (Partly) – (I) ILRC Kuchor Aathooni

18 – Nokha 1. Tehsil Nokha excluding ILRC Kuchor Aathooni 4-DISTRICT CHURU

19 – Sadulpur 1. Tehsil Rajgarh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Rajgarh including Municipal Board Rajgarh (II) ILRC Hamirawas Bara (III) ILRC-Ragha Chhoti (IV) ILRC-Sankhoo (V) ILRC-Chainpura Chhota (VI) ILRC-Sidhmukh

20 – Taranagar 1. Tehsil Taranagar 2. Tehsil Rajgarh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Dadarewa (II) ILRC-Dokwa, 3. Tehsil Sardarshahar (Partly) – (I) ILRC Ratoosar

21 – Sardarshahar 1. Tehsil Sardarshahar excluding ILRC Ratoosar 2. Tehsil Ratangarh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Golsar

22 – Churu 1. Tehsil Churu 23 – Ratangarh 1. Tehsil Ratangarh excluding ILRC Golsar 2. Tehsil Sujangarh

(Partly) - (I) ILRC Chhapar including Municipal Board Chhapar (II) ILRC Khuri

24 – Sujangarh (SC) 1. Tehsil Sujangarh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Sujangarh including Municipal Board Sujangarh, (II) ILRC Jeeli (III) ILRC Salasar (IV) ILRC Bidasar including Municipal Board Bidasar (V) ILRC Lalgarh (VI) ILRC Tendesar

5-DISTRICT JHUNJHUNU25 – Pilani (SC) 1. Tehsil Chirawa (Partly) – (I) ILRC Pilani including Municipal

Board Pilani and Municipal Board Vidhya Vihar (II) ILRC Chirawa including Municipal Board Chirawa (III) ILRC Mandrela (IV) ILRC Sultana (Partly) – (i) PC Ardawata (V) ILRC Surajgarh (Partly) – (i) PC Adooka (ii) PC Farat (iii) PC Sehi Kalan

26 – Surajgarh 1. Tehsil Buhana 2. Tehsil Chirawa (Partly) – (I) ILRC Surajgarh (Partly) – (i) Surajgarh Municipal Board (ii) PC Baloda (iii) PC Berla (iv) PC Bhaothari (v) PC Dheengariya (vi) PC Jakhod (vii) PC Kakora (viii) PC Kidwana (ix) PC Lakhoo (x) PC Lotiya (xi) PC Mahpalwas

27 – Jhunjhunu 1. Tehsil Jhunjhunu (Partly) – (I) ILRC Jhunjhunu including Municipal Board Jhunjhunu and Municipal Board Bagar (II) ILRC Kulod Kalan 2. Tehsil Chirawa (Partly) – ILRC Sultana (Partly) – (i) PC Chanana (ii) PC Solana (iiii) PC Kishorepura (iv) PC Kithana (v) PC Sultana (vi) PC Sari

28 – Mandawa 1. Tehsil Jhunjhunu (Partly) – (I) ILRC Mandawa including Municipal Board Mandawa (II) ILRC Bisau including Municipal Board Bisau (III) ILRC Malsisar (IV) ILRC Rampura

29 – Nawalgarh 1. Tehsil Nawalgarh 30 – Gudha 1. Tehsil Udaipurwati 31 – Khetri 1. Tehsil Khetri

6-DISTRICT SIKAR32 – Fatehpur 1. Tehsil Fatehpur

33 – Lachhmangarh 1. Teshil Lachhmangarh 34 – Dhod (SC) 1. Tehsil Sikar (Partly) – (I) ILRC-Dhod (II) ILRC Sihot Bari

(III) ILRC Sihot Chhoti (IV) ILRC Doojod (V) ILRC Dadiya (Partly) (i) PC Gothra Bhookran (ii) PC Kudan (iii) PC Raseedpura 2. Tehsil Dantaramgarh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Losal (Partly) – (i) Municipal Board Losal (ii) PC Bhagatpura (iii) PC Bheema (iv) PC Jana (v) PC Sangalia (vi) PC Khood

35 – Sikar 1. Tehsil Sikar (Partly) – (I) ILRC Sikar including Municipal Council Sikar (II) ILRC Piprali (II) ILRC Dadiya (Partly) – (i) PC Dadiya (ii) PC Kotra Beri (iii) Tarpura (iv) PC Koleera

36 – Danta Ramgarh Tehsil Dantaramgarh excluding Municipal Board Losal, PC Bhagatpura, PC Bheema, PC Jana, PC Sangalia and PC Khood of ILRC Losal

37 – Khandela Tehsil Srimadhopur (Partly) – (I) ILRC Khandela including Municipal Board Khandela (II) ILRC Jajod (III) ILRC Kanwat (IV) ILRC Reengus including Municipal Board Reengus (V) ILRC Srimadhopur (Partly) – (i) PC Bassi (ii) PC Nimera (iii) PC Ralawata

38 – Neema Ka Thana

Tehsil Neema Ka Thana (Partly) – (I) ILRC Neem Ka Thana including Municipal Board Neem Ka Thana (II) ILRC Patan (III) ILRC Chala (IV) ILRC Dabla

39 – Srimadhopur 1. Tehsil Srimadhopur (Partly) – (I) ILRC Mau (II) ILRC Ajitgarh (III) ILRC Srimadhopur (Partly) – (i) Municipal Board Srimadhopur (ii) PC Srimadhopur Rural (iii) PC Hanspur (iv) PC Kotri Shimarla (v) PC Jorawar Nagar 2. Tehsil Neem Ka Thana (Partly) – (I) ILRC Sanwalpura Tanwaran

7-DISTRICT JAIPUR40 – Kotputli Tehsil Kotputli (Partly) – (I) ILRC Kotputli including Municipal

Board Kotputli (II) ILRC Narheda (III) ILRC Paniyala (IV) ILRC Dantil

41 – Viratnagar 1. Tehsil Viratnagar 2. Tehsil Kotputli (Partly) – (I) ILRC Paota, 3. Tehsil Shahpura (Partly) – (I) ILRC Shahpura (Partly) – (i) PC Chhapra Khurd (ii) PC Nathawala (iii) PC Rampura (iv) PC Saiwar

42 – Shahpura 1. Tehsil Shahpura excluding PC Chhapra Khurd, PC Nathawala, PC Rampura & PC Saiwar of ILRC Shahpura 2. Tehsil Chomu (Partly) – (I) ILRC Khejroli (Partly) – (i) PC Amarpura (ii) PC Khejroli (iii) PC Nangal Koju (iv) PC Niwana (v) PC Tigariya (vi) PC Nangal Bharda

43 – Chomu 1. Tehsil Chomu (Partly) – (I) ILRC Chomu including Municipal Board Chomu (II) ILRC Govindgarh (III) ILRC Kaladera (IV) ILRC Khejroli (Partly) – (i) PC Singod Kalan (ii) PC Singod Khurd (iii) PC Itawa Bhopji (iv) PC Udaipuriya

44 – Phulera 1. Tehsil Phulera (Partly) – (I) ILRC Sambhar including Municipal Board Sambhar Lake and Municipal Board Phulera (II) ILRC Renwal including Municipal Board Kishangarh Renwal (III) ILRC Bhainslana (IV) ILRC Narayana (V) ILRC Karansar (Partly) – (i) PC Doongari Khurd (ii) PC Harsoli (iii) PC Kherimilak (iv) PC Ramjipura Kalan

45 – Dudu (SC) 1. Tehsil Dudu 2. Tehsil Phagi (Partly) – (I) ILRC Phagi (II) ILRC Chouru (III) ILRC Mandor (IV) ILRC Nimera

46 – Jhotwara 1. Municipal Corporation Jaipur (Partly) – Ward No. 2 and 3, 2. Rural area of tehsil Jaipur excluding PC Jamdoli and PC Sumel of ILRC Jaipur East, 3. Tehsil Phulera (Partly) – (I) ILRC Jobner including Municipal Board Jobner (II) ILRC Karnasar (Partly) – (i) PC Karnasar (ii) PC Bhainsawa (iii) PC Doongari Kalan (iv) PC Hingoniya (v) PC Jorpura Sundariyawas

47 – Amber 1. Tehsil Amber including Ward No. 53 of Municipal Corporation, Jaipur

48 – Jamwa Ramgarh (ST)

1. Tehsil Jamwaramgarh

49 – Hawa Mahal Municipal Corporation, Jaipur (Partly) – Ward No. 51, 52, 54, 55, 58, 59 and 63 to 65

50 – Vidhyadhar Nagar

Municipal Corporation, Jaipur (Partly) – Ward No. 1, 8 to 10 and 68 to 70

51 – Civil Lines Municipal Corporation, Jaipur (Partly) – Ward No. 4 to 7, 11, 17, 36, 37, 66 and 67

52 – Kishan Pole Municipal Corporation, Jaipur (Partly) – Ward No. 38 to 43, 45, 50, 56, 57 and 60 to 62

53 – Adarsh Nagar Municipal Corporation Jaipur (Partly) – Ward No. 29, 30, 32 to 34, 44 and 46 to 49

54 – Malviya Nagar Municipal Corporation, Jaipur (Partly) – Ward No. 15, 16, 18 to 21, 25 to 27, 31 and 35

55 – Sanganer Municipal Corporation Jaipur (Partly) – Ward No. 12 to 14, 22 and 23

56 – Bagru (SC) 1. Tehsil Sanganer excluding urban area but including Municipal Board Bagru 2. Municipal Corporation, Jaipur – (Partly) Ward No. 24 and 28

57 – Bassi (ST) 1. Tehsil Bassi, 2. Tehsil Jaipur (Partly) – (I) ILRC Jaipur East (Partly) – (i) PC Sumel (ii) PC Jamdoli, 2. Tehsil Chaksu (Partly) – (I) ILRC Kotkhawada (Partly) – (i) PC Mahadeopura (ii) PC Rupaherikalan

58 – Chaksu (SC) 1. Tehsil Chaksu excluding PC Mahadeopura and PC Rupaherikalan of ILRC Kotkhawada, 2. Tehsil Phagi (Partly) – (I) ILRC Chittora (II) ILRC Madhorajpura (III) ILRC Renwal

8-DISTRICT ALWAR59 – Tijara 1. Tehsil Tijara 60 – Khairthal 1. Tehsil Kishangarh Bas 2. Tehsil Kotkasim 61 – Mundawar 1. Tehsil Mundawar, 2. Tehsil Behror (Partly) – (I) ILRC

Neemrana 62 – Behror 1. Tehsil Behror (Partly) – (I) ILRC Behror including Municipal

Board Behror (II) ILRC Bardod (III) ILRC Mandhan (IV) ILRC Gandala

63 – Bansur 1. Tehsil Bansur, 2. Tehsil Thanagazi (Partly) – (I) ILRC Narainpur

64 – Thanagazi 1. Tehsil Thanagazi excluding ILRC Narainpur 2. Tehsil

Rajgarh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Rajpur Bara (II) ILRC Tahla (III) ILRC Khoh (IV) ILRC Rajgarh (Partly) – (i) PC Dubbi (ii) PC Karoth (iii) PC Nayagaon Bolka (iv) PC Dhamred (v) PC Thanarajaji

65 – Alwar Rural (SC)

Tehsil Alwar excluding Municipal Council Alwar, PC Alwar (Rural), PC Bhoogor and PC Diwakari of ILRC Alwar

66 – Alwar Urban 1. Tehsil Alwar (Partly) - (I) ILRC Alwar (Partly) - (i) Municipal Council Alwar (ii) PC Alwar (Rural) (iii) PC Bhoogor (iv) PC Diwakari.

67 – Ramgarh 1. Tehsil Ramgarh, 2. Tehsil Laxmangarh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Govindgarh (II) ILRC Baroda Meo (III) ILRC Moliya (Partly) – (i) PC Dongari (ii) PC Semla Khurd (iii) PC Bhainsrawat (iv) PC Phahri

68 – Rajgarh (ST) 1. Tehsil Rajgarh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Machari (II) ILRC Pinan (III) ILRC Reni (IV) ILRC Dhigawara (V) ILRC Rajgarh (Partly) – (i) Municipal Board Rajgarh (ii) PC Rajgarh-A (iii) PC Rajgarh (B) (iv) PC Alei 2. Tehsil Laxmangarh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Laxmangarh (II) ILRC Bichgaon (III) ILRC Mojpur

69 – Kathumar (SC) 1. Tehsil Kathumar 2. Tehsil Laxmangarh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Khudiyana (II) ILRC Moliya (Partly) – (i) PC Moliya (ii) PC Badka (iii) PC Itera

9-DISTRICT BHARATPUR70 – Kaman 1. Tehsil Kaman 2. Tehsil Pahari 71 – Nagar 1. Tehsil Nagar 2. Tehsil Deeg (Partly) – (I) ILRC Khoh (II)

ILRC Pasta (III) ILRC Bedham (IV) ILRC Januthar 72 – Deeg-Kumher 1. Tehsil Kumher 2. Tehsil Deeg (Partly) – (I) ILRC Deeg

including Municipal Board Deeg (II) ILRC Kasot (III) ILRC Baroli Choth (IV) ILRC Sinsini

73 – Bharatpur Tehsil Bharatpur (Partly) – (I) ILRC Bharatpur including Municipal Council Bharatpur (II) ILRC Peepla (III) ILRC Chiksana (IV) ILRC Jaghina

74 – Nadbai 1. Tehsil Nadbai 2. Tehsil Bharatpur (Partly) – (I) ILRC Sewar (II) ILRC Aghapur 3. Tehsil Rupbas (Partly) – (I) ILRC Khanuwa (II) ILRC Uchain

75 – Weir (SC) 1. Tehsil Weir 2. Tehsil Bayana (Partly) – (I) ILRC Farso (II) ILRC Khareri

76 – Bayana (SC) 1. Tehsil Bayana (Partly) – (I) ILRC Bayana including Municipal Board Bayana (II) ILRC Samogar (III) ILRC Mahmadpura (IV) ILRC Milakpur 2. Tehsil Rupbas (Partly) – (I) ILRC Rupbas (II) ILRC Khansurjapur (III) ILRC Rudawal

10-DISTRICT DHOLPUR77 – Baseri (SC) 1. Tehsil Baseri, 2. Tehsil Bari (Partly) – (I) ILRC Umreh 78 – Bari 1. Tehsil Bari (Partly) – (I) ILRC Kasbabari including Municipal

Board Bari (II) ILRC Basai Dang (III) ILRC Talab Shahi (IV) ILRC Kanchanpur, 2. Tehsil Saipau (Partly) – (I) ILRC Saipau (II) ILRC Donari (III) ILRC Basai Nawab

79 – Dholpur 1. Tehsil Dholpur (Partly) – (I) ILRC Dholpur including Municipal Board Dholpur (II) ILRC Jatoli (III) ILRC Pachgaon,

2. Tehsil Saipau (Partly) – (I) ILRC Kareempur (II) ILRC Kolari

80 – Rajakhera 1. Tehsil Rajakhera 2. Tehsil Dholpur (Partly) – (I) ILRC Marhabhau (II) ILRC Maniyan

11-DISTRICT KARAULI81 – Todabhim (ST) 1. Tehsil Nadoti, 2. Tehsil Todabhim (Partly) – (I) ILRC

Todabhim including Municipal Board Todabhim (II) ILRC Kamalpura (III) ILRC Kariri (IV) ILRC Padampura (V) ILRC Nangal Sherpur (VI) ILRC Balghat

82 – Hindaun (SC) 1. Tehsil Hindaun (Partly) – (I) ILRC Hindaun including Municipal Board Hindaun (II) ILRC Shri Mahaveerji (III) ILRC Bargawan (IV) ILRC Mahoo Ibrahimpur (V) ILRC Suroth 2. Tehsil Todabhim (Partly) – (I) ILRC Mahamadpur

83 – Karauli 1. Tehsil Karauli (Partly) – (I) ILRC Karauli including Municipal Board Karauli (II) ILRC Chainpur (III) ILRC Gunesra (IV) ILRC Kheriya (V) ILRC Masalpur 2. Tehsil Hindaun (Partly) – (I) ILRC Khera (II) ILRC Sherpur

84 – Sapotra (ST) 1. Tehsil Sapotra, 2. Tehsil Mandrail 3. Tehsil Karauli (Partly) – (I) ILRC Maholi (II) ILRC Kailadevi

12-DISTRICT DAUSA85 – Bandikui 1. Tehsil Baswa (Partly) – (I) ILRC Bandikui including

Municipal Board Bandikui (II) ILRC Baswa (III) ILRC Badiyal Kalan (IV) ILRC Gurha Katla (V) ILRC Gurhaliya (VI) ILRC Biwai

86 – Mahuwa 1. Tehsil Mahuwa, 2. Tehsil Baswa (Partly) – (I) ILRC Baijupara

87 – Sikrai (SC) 1. Tehsil Sikrai 2. Tehsil Dausa (Partly) – (I) ILRC Alooda (II) ILRC Bhandarej

88 – Dausa 1. Tehsil Dausa (Partly) – (I) ILRC Dausa including Municipal Board Dausa (II) ILRC Jasota (III) ILRC Kundal (IV) ILRC Lawan (V) ILRC Sainthal (VI) ILRC Baniyana (VII) ILRC Nangal Rajawatan

89 – Lalsot (ST) 1. Tehsil Lalsot 13-DISTRICT SAWAI MADHOPUR

90 – Gangapur 1. Tehsil Gangapur 91 – Bamanwas (ST) 1. Tehsil Bamanwas, 2. Tehsil Bonli 92 – Sawai Madhopur

1. Tehsil Malarna Dungar 2. Tehsil Sawai Madhopur (Partly) – (I) ILRC Sawai Madhopur including Municipal Board Sawai Madhopur (II) ILRC Seloo (III) ILRC Soorwal (IV) ILRC Kundera

93 – Khandar (SC) 1. Tehsil Khandar 2. Tehsil Choth Ka Barwara 3. Tehsil Sawai Madhopur (Partly) – (I) ILRC Kustala (II) ILRC Phalaudi (III) ILRC Rawajana Chaur

14-DISTRICT TONK 94 – Malpura 1. Tehsil Malpura 2. Tehsil Todaraisingh (Partly) – (I) ILRC

Todaraisingh including Municipal Board Todaraisingh (II) ILRC Datob 3. Tehsil Deoli (Partly) – (I) ILRC Nasirda

95 – Niwai (SC) 1. Tehsil Niwai 2. Tehsil Peeplu

96 – Tonk 1. Tehsil Tonk 2. Tehsil Todaraisingh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Mor (II) ILRC Khareda (III) ILRC Lamba Kalan

97 – Deoli 1. Tehsil Uniara 2. Tehsil Deoli excluding ILRC Nasirda 15-DISTRICT AJMER

98 – Kishangarh 1. Tehsil Kishangarh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Kishangarh including Municipal Board Kishangarh (II) ILRC Harmara (III) ILRC Sironj (IV) ILRC Akodiya (V) ILRC Arain (VI) ILRC Bandar Seendri (VII) ILRC Lamba (VIII) ILRC Barana (IX) ILRC Ralawata 2. Tehsil Sarwar (Partly) – (I) ILRC Dabrela (II) ILRC Borada

99 – Pushkar 1. Tehsil Ajmer excluding area of Municipal Council Ajmer and ILRC Ajmer – III 2. Tehsil Kishangarh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Karkeri (II) ILRC Kotri (III) ILRC Roopangarh

100 – Ajmer North 1. Tehsil Ajmer (Partly) - (I) Ajmer Municipal Council (Partly) – Ward No. 1 to 5, 16, 17, 19 to 32 and 49 to 55 including Cantonment Board Ajmer (II) ILRC Ajmer – III

101 – Ajmer South (SC)

1. Tehsil Ajmer (Partly) (I) Ajmer Municipal Council (Partly) – Ward No. 6 to 15, 18 and 33 to 48

102 – Nasirabad 1. Tehsil Nasirabad 2. Tehsil Pisangan 103 – Beawar 1. Tehsil Beawar 104 – Masuda 1. Tehsil Masuda 2. Tehsil Bhinay 105 – Kekri 1. Tehsil Kekri 2. Tehsil Sarwar (Partly) – (I) ILRC Sarwar

including Municipal Board Sarwar (II) ILRC Ajgara (III) ILRC Hingoniya (IV) ILRC Sapala (V) ILRC Fatehgarh (VI) ILRC Goyla (VII) ILRC Tantoti

16-DISTRICT NAGAUR106 – Ladnun 1. Tehsil Ladnun 2. Tehsil Deedwana (Partly) – (I) ILRC

Noowa 107 – Deedwana 1. Tehsil Deedwana (Partly) – (I) ILRC Deedwana including

Municipal Board Deedwana (II) ILRC Khunkhuna (III) ILRC Molasar (IV) ILRC Khatu Khurd

108 – Jayal (SC) 1. Tehsil Jayal 2. Tehsil Nagaur (Partly) – (I) ILRC Jodhiyasi 109 – Nagaur 1. Tehsil Nagaur (Partly) – (I) ILRC Nagaur including

Municipal Board Nagaur (II) ILRC Alay (III) ILRC Mundwa including Municipal Board Mundwa (IV) ILRC Kumari

110 – Khinwsar 1. Tehsil Khinwsar 2. Tehsil Nagaur (Partly) – (I) ILRC Kharnal (II) ILRC Sankhwas (III) ILRC Khajwana including Municipal Board Kuchera 3. Tehsil Merta (Partly) – (I) ILRC Nokha Chandawatan

111 – Merta (SC) 1. Tehsil Merta (Partly) – (I) ILRC Merta including Municipal Board Merta (II) ILRC Riyan Bari (III) ILRC Padukalan (IV) ILRC Gotan (V) ILRC Jasnagar (VI) ILRC Gagrana (VII) ILRC Merta Road (Phalodi)

112 – Degana 1. Tehsil Degana 113 – Makrana 2. Tehsil Makrana 114 – Parbatsar 1. Tehsil Parbatsar 2. Tehsil Nawan (Partly) – (I) ILRC

Meethari (II) ILRC Kuchaman City (Partly) – (i) PC Anandpura (ii) PC Rasal (iii) PC Rooppura

115 – Nawan 1. Tehsil Nawan (Partly) – (I) ILRC Nawan including Municipal Board Nawan (II) ILRC Chitawa (III) ILRC Loonwa (IV) ILRC Maroth (V) ILRC Kuchaman City (Partly) – (i) Municipal Board Kuchaman City (ii) PC Bhanwata (iii) PC Heerani (iv) PC Jiliya (v) PC Panchawa (vi) PC Parewadi (vii) PC Sabalpura

17-DISTRICT PALI116 – Jaitaran 1. Tehsil Jaitaran 2. Tehsil Raipur (Partly) – (I) ILRC Kot

Kirana (II) ILRC Babra (III) ILRC Sendra 117 - Sojat (SC) 1. Tehsil Sojat 2. Tehsil Raipur (Partly) – (I) ILRC Raipur (II)

ILRC Pipliya Kalan 118 – Pali 1. Tehsil Pali (Partly) – (I) Municipal Council Pali 2. Tehsil

Rohat 119 – Marwar Junction

1. Tehsil Marwar Junction 2. Tehsil Desuri (Partly) – (I) ILRC Khiwara (II) ILRC Magar Talav (III) ILRC Rani including Municipal Board Rani Khurd

120 – Bali 1. Tehsil Bali 2. Tehsil Desuri (Partly) – (I) ILRC Desuri including Municipal Board Sadri (II) ILRC Nadol

121 – Sumerpur 1. Tehsil Sumerpur 2. Tehsil Pali excluding area of Municipal Council Pali

18-DISTRICT JODHPUR122 – Phalodi 1. Tehsil Phalodi (Partly) – (I) ILRC Phalodi including

Municipal Board Phalodi (II) ILRC Bap (III) ILRC Aau (Partly) – (i) PC Bheenyasar (ii) PC Bhojasar (iii) PC Boongdi (iv) PC Champasar (v) PC Ghantiyali (vi) PC Jaisala (vii) PC Pariyal (viii) PC Kelansar

123 – Lohawat 1. Tehsil Phalodi (Partly) – (I) ILRC Lohawat (II) ILRC Aau (Partly) – (i) PC Aau (ii) PC Chadi (iii) PC Ishru (iv) PC Ridmalsar 2. Tehsil Osian (Partly) – (I) ILRC Bapini 3. Tehsil Shergarh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Setrawa

124 – Shergarh 1. Tehsil Shergarh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Shergarh (II) ILRC Solankiya Tala (III) ILRC Balesar (IV) ILRC Chamu

125 – Osian 1. Tehsil Osian (Partly) – (I) ILRC Osian (II) ILRC Mathaniya (III) ILRC Tinwari (IV) ILRC Cherai

126 – Bhopalgarh (SC)

1. Tehsil Bhopalgarh 2. Tehsil Jodhpur (Partly) – (I) ILRC Jajiwal Kalan

127 – Sardarpura 1. Tehsil Jodhpur (Partly)- (I) Jodhpur Municipal Corporation (Partly) – Ward No. 32 to 34, 36, 38, 39 and 48 to 59

128 – Jodhpur 1. Tehsil Jodhpur (Partly) - Jodhpur Municipal Corporation (Partly) –Ward No. 19 to 31, 35, 37 and 40 to 47 (II) ILRC Jodhpur (Partly) – (i) PC Jhalamand

129 – Soorsagar 1. Tehsil Jodhpur (Partly) - Jodhpur Municipal Corporation (Partly) – Ward No. 1 to 18 and 60 (II) ILRC Jodhpur (Partly) – (i) PC Pal

130 – Luni 1. Tehsil Luni 2. Tehsil Jodhpur (Partly) – (I) ILRC Keroo (II) ILRC Mandor (III) ILRC Jodhpur (Partly) – (i) PC Bagan (ii) PC Nandra Kalan

131 – Bilara (SC) 1. Tehsil Bilara 2. Tehsil Jodhpur (Partly) – (I) ILRC Bisalpur (II) ILRC Dangiyawas

19-DISTRICT JAISALMER132 – Jaisalmer 1. Tehsil Jaisalmer 2. Tehsil Fatehgarh 133 – Pokran 1. Tehsil Pokran

20-DISTRICT BARMER134 – Sheo 1. Tehsil Sheo 2. Tehsil Ramsar 3. Tehsil Chohtan (Partly) -

(I) ILRC Bijrar excluding PC Dhok 135 – Barmer 1. Tehsil Barmer 136 – Baytoo 1. Tehsil Baytoo 2. Tehsil Pachpadra (Partly) – (I) ILRC Patodi 137 – Pachpadra Tehsil Pachpadra (Partly) – (I) ILRC Pachpadra (II) ILRC Jasol

including Municipal Board Balotra (III) ILRC Kalyanpur (IV) ILRC Tilwara (V) ILRC Thob

138 – Siwana 1. Tehsil Siwana 2. Tehsil Gudhamalani (Partly) – (I) ILRC Sindhari

139 – Gudha Malani 1. Tehsil Gudhamalani excluding ILRC Sindhari 140 – Chohtan (SC) 1. Tehsil Chohtan excluding ILRC Bijrar but including PC Dhok

21-DISTRICT JALORE141 – Ahore 1. Tehsil Ahore 2. Tehsil Jalore (Partly) – (I) ILRC Bagra 142 - Jalore (SC) 1. Tehsil Sayla 2. Tehsil Jalore (Partly) – (I) ILRC Jalore

including Municipal Board Jalore (II) ILRC Bakra (III) ILRC Mandwala

143 – Bhinmal 1. Tehsil Bagora 2. Tehsil Bhinmal (Partly) – (I) ILRC Bharoori (II) ILRC Daspan (III) ILRC Modra (IV) ILRC Ramseen (V) ILRC Bhinmal (Partly) – (i) Municipal Board Bhinmal (ii) PC Bhagal Bhim (iii) PC Gajipura (iv) PC Sindhara (v) PC Nimbawas (vi) PC Nimbora (vii) PC Dantiwas (viii) PC Phagotra (ix) PC Punasa (x) PC Thobau

144 – Sanchore 1. Tehsil Sanchore (Partly) – (I) ILRC Sanchore including Municipal Board Sanchore (II) ILRC Chitalwana (III) ILRC Jhab (IV) ILRC Sarwana (V) ILRC Surachand (VI) ILRC Arnay

145 – Raniwara 1. Tehsil Raniwara 2. Tehsil Sanchore (Partly) – (I) ILRC Sarnau 3. Tehsil Bhinmal (Partly) – (I) ILRC Jaswantpura (II) ILRC Bhinmal (Partly) – (i) PC Pawli (ii) PC Sawidar

22-DISTRICT SIROHI146 – Sirohi 1. Tehsil Sirohi 2. Tehsil Sheoganj 147 – Pindwara Abu (ST)

1. Tehsil Pindwara 2. Tehsil Abu Road (Partly) – (I) ILRC Mount Abu including Municipal Board Mount Abu (II) ILRC Kiwarli

148 – Reodar (SC) 1. Tehsil Reodar 2. Tehsil Abu Road (Partly) – (I) ILRC Abu Road including Municipal Board Abu Road (II) ILRC Mungthala

23-DISTRICT UDAIPUR149 – Gogunda (ST) 1. Tehsil Gogunda 2. Tehsil Kotra (Partly) – (I) ILRC Malwa ka

Chora (II) ILRC Was 3. Tehsil Girwa (Partly) – (I) ILRC Iswal (II) ILRC Badgaon (Partly) – (i) PC Badgaon (ii) PC Madar (iii) PC Thoor (iv) PC Lakhawali

150 – Jhadol (ST) 1. Tehsil Jhadol 2. Tehsil Kotra (Partly) – (I) ILRC Kotra (II) ILRC Bikarni

151 – Kherwara (ST) 1. Tehsil Kherwara 2. Tehsil Sarada (Partly) – (I) ILRC Semari

152 – Udaipur Rural (ST)

1. Tehsil Girwa (Partly) - (I) Udaipur Municipal Council (Partly) – Ward No. 6 to 9, 24 to 27 and 39 (II) ILRC Barapal (III) ILRC Bhoiyon ki Pancholi (IV) ILRC Nai (V) ILRC City (Partly) – (i) PC Savina (ii) PC Shobhagpura (iii) PC Teetardi (iv) PC Goverdhan Vilas (v) PC Dheekli (vi) PC Madari Purohitan (vii) PC Bhuwana

153 – Udaipur 1. Tehsil Girwa (Partly) (I) Udaipur Municipal Council (Partly) – Ward No. 1 to 5, 10 to 23, 28 to 38 and 40 to 50

154 – Mavli 1. Tehsil Mavli 2. Tehsil Girwa (Partly) – (I) ILRC Badgaon (Partly) – (i) PC Bedla (ii) PC Chirwa (iii) PC Kailashpuri (iv) PC Sapetiya (II) ILRC Debari (Partly) – (i) PC Bhesda Kalan (ii) PC Bhalon ka Gudha (iii) PC Debari (iv) PC Lakadwas (v) PC Sakroda

155 – Vallabh Nagar 1. Tehsil Vallabh Nagar 2. Tehsil Girwa (Partly) – (I) ILRC Bambora (II) ILRC Kurabad (III) ILRC Debari (Partly) – (i) PC Sheeshwi

156 – Salumber (ST) 1. Tehsil Salumber (Partly) – (I) ILRC Salumber including Municipal Board Salumber (II) ILRC Baroda (III) ILRC Kharka 2. Tehsil Sarada (Partly) – (I) ILRC Sarada (II) ILRC Jaisamand (III) ILRC Palodara (IV) ILRC Sallara

157 – Dhariawad (ST)

1. Tehsil Dhariawad 2. Tehsil Salumber (Partly) – (I) ILRC Jhallara (II) ILRC Bhabrana

24-DISTRICT DUNGARPUR158 – Dungarpur (ST)

1. Tehsil Dungarpur (Partly) – (I) ILRC Dungarpur including Municipal Board Dungarpur (II) ILRC Bichhiwara (III) ILRC Dewal (IV) ILRC Thana (V) ILRC Genji (Partly) – (i) PC Mada (ii) PC Bhehana (iii) PC Galandar (iv) PC Gamri Ahara (v) PC Mewara (vi) PC Rampur Mewara

159 – Aspur (ST) 1. Tehsil Aspur 2. Tehsil Dungarpur (Partly) – (I) ILRC Antri (II) ILRC Faloj

160 – Sagwara (ST) 1. Tehsil Sagwara 161 – Chorasi (ST) 1. Tehsil Simalwara 2. Tehsil Dungarpur (Partly) – (I) ILRC

Genji (Partly) – (i) PC Renta (ii) PC Vikas Nagar (iii) PC Genji (iv) PC Mahuri

25-DISTRICT BANSWARA162 – Ghatol (ST) 1. Tehsil Ghatol 163 – Garhi (ST) 1. Tehsil Garhi 2. Tehsil Banswara (Partly) – (i) ILRC Talwara 164 – Banswara (ST) 1. Tehsil Banswara excluding ILRC Talwara 165 – Bagidora (ST) 1. Tehsil Bagidora 166 – Kushalgarh (ST)

1. Tehsil Kushalgarh

26-DISTRICT CHITTORGARH167 – Kapasan (SC) 1. Teshil Kapasan 2. Tehsil Rashmi 3. Tehsil Bhadesar (Partly)

– (I) ILRC Bansen (II) ILRC Bhadsora 168 – Begun 1. Tehsil Begun 2. Tehsil Rawatbhata 3. Tehsil Gangrar

excluding urban area of Municipal Board Chittorgarh 169 – Chittorgarh 1. Tehsil Chittorgarh 2. Tehsil Gangrar (Partly) - Area of

Municipal Board Chittorgarh 3. Tehsil Bhadesar (Partly) – (I)

ILRC Bhadesar 170 – Nimbahera 1. Tehsil Nimbahera 2. Tehsil Chhoti Sadri 171 – Bari Sadri 1. Tehsil Bari Sadri 2. Tehsil Dungla 3. Tehsil Bhadesar

(Partly) – (I) ILRC Asawara 4. Tehsil Pratapgarh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Deogarh (II) ILRC Dhamotar

172 – Pratapgarh (ST)

1. Tehsil Arnod 2. Tehsil Pratapgarh (Partly) – (I) ILRC Pratapgarh including Municipal Board Pratapgarh (II) ILRC Panmori (III) ILRC Awaleshwar (IV) ILRC Suhagpura

27-DISTRICT RAJSAMAND173 - Bhim 1. Tehsil Bhim 2. Tehsil Deogarh 174 – Kumbhalgarh 1. Tehsil Kumbhalgarh 2. Tehsil Amet 175 – Rajsamand 1. Tehsil Rajsamand 2. Tehsil Railmagra (Partly) – (I) ILRC

Kuraj (II) ILRC Gilund 176 – Nathdwara 1. Tehsil Nathdwara 2. Tehsil Railmagra (Partly) – (I) ILRC

Railmagra (II) ILRC Banedian 28-DISTILRCT BHILWARA

177 – Asind 1. Tehsil Asind 2. Tehsil Hurda 178 – Mandal 1. Tehsil Mandal 2. Tehsil Bhilwara (Partly) - (I) ILRC Danthal

(II) ILRC Mangrop (III) ILRC Suwana 179 – Sahara 1. Tehsil Sahara 2. Tehsil Raipur 3. Tehsil Bhilwara (Partly) –

(I) ILRC Karoi Kalan (II) ILRC Pur (III) ILRC Hameergarh 180 – Bhilwara 1. Tehsil Bhilwara (Partly) – (I) ILRC Bhilwara including

Municipal Council Bhilwara 181 – Shahpura (SC)

1. Tehsil Shahpura 2. Tehsil Banera

182 – Jahazpur 1. Tehsil Jahazpur 2.Tehsil Kotri (Partly) – (I) ILRC Kotri (II) ILRC Sawaipur (III) ILRC Paroli

183 – Mandalgarh 1. Tehsil Mandalgarh 2. Tehsil Bijoliya 3. Tehsil Kotri (Partly) – (i) ILRC Nandrai (ii) ILRC Badliyas

29-DISTRICT BUNDI184 – Hindoli 1. Tehsil Hindoli 2. Tehsil Nainwa (Partly) – (I) ILRC Nainwa

including Municipal Board Nainwa (II) ILRC Jajawar (III) ILRC Bansi (IV) ILRC Dei

185 - Keshoraipatan (SC)

1. Tehsil Keshoraipatan 2. Tehsil Indergarh 3. Tehsil Nainwa (Partly) – (I) ILRC Jetpur (II) ILRC Karwar (III) ILRC Bamangaon

186 – Bundi 1. Tehsil Bundi 30-DISTRICT KOTA

187 – Pipalda 1. Tehsil Pipalda 2. Tehsil Digod (Partly) – (I) ILRC Barod (II) ILRC Sultanpur (III) ILRC Jhargaon

188 - Digod 1. Tehsil Sangod 2. Tehsil Digod (Partly) – (I) ILRC Digod (II) ILRC Rel (III) ILRC Seemalya

189 – Kota North 1. Tehsil Ladpura (Partly) - (I) Kota Municipal Corporation (Partly) – Ward No. 1, 2, 12 to 32 and 49 to 52

190 – Kota South 1. Tehsil Ladpura (Partly) (I) Kota Municipal Corporation (Partly) – Ward No. 3 to 6, 33 to 42, 53 to 58 and 60

191 – Ladpura 1. Tehsil Ladpura (Partly) – (I) Kota Muncipal Corporation

(Partly) – Ward No. 7 to 11, 43 to 48 and 59 (II) ILRC Kaithoon including Municipal Board Kaithoon (III) ILRC Tather (IV) ILRC Mandana (Partly) – (i) PC Kalyakheri (ii) PC Mandana (iii) PC Mandlaya (iv) PC Alniya (v) PC Ranpur (vi) PC Kasar (V) ILRC Ladpura (Partly) – (i) PC Kishanpura Takiya (ii) PC Rangpur (iii) PC Girdharpura

192 – Ramganj Mandi (SC)

1. Tehsil Ramganj Mandi 2. Tehsil Ladpura (Partly) – (I) ILRC Mandana (Partly) – (i) PC Borabans (ii) PC Dharampura (iii) PC Bhanwariya (iv) PC Dolya (v) PC Dobara

31-DISTRICT BARAN193 – Anta 1. Tehsil Anta 2. Tehsil Mangrol 3. Tehsil Baran (Partly) – (I)

ILRC Koyala (II) ILRC Bamala 194 – Kishanganj (ST)

1. Tehsil Kishanganj 2. Tehsil Shahbad

195 – Baran (SC) 1. Tehsil Atru 2. Tehsil Baran (Partly) – (I) ILRC Baran including Municipal Board Baran (II) ILRC Fatehpur

196 - Chhabra 1. Tehsil Chhabra 2. Tehsil Chhipabarod 32-DISTRICT JHALAWAR

197 – Dag (SC) 1. Tehsil Pachpahar 2. Tehsil Gangdhar 198 – Jhalrapatan 1. Tehsil Pirawa 2.Tehsil Jhalrapatan (Partly) – (I) ILRC

Jhalrapatan including Municipal Board Jhalrapatan (II) ILRC Samrai (III) ILRC Jhalawar (Partly) - (i) Municipal Board Jhalawar (ii) PC Durgpura (iii) PC Gindor (iv) PC Kalmandi Kalan (v) PC Khanpuriya (vi) PC Salotiya

199 - Khanpur 1. Tehsil Khanpur 2. Tehsil Jhalrapatan (Partly) – (I) ILRC Mandawar (II) ILRC Ratlai (III) ILRC Salawad (IV) ILRC Bakani (V) ILRC Reechwa (VI) ILRC Jhalawar (Partly) – (i) PC Gagron (ii) PC Govindpura

200 – Manohar Thana

1. Tehsil Manohar Thana 2. Tehsil Aklera 3. Tehsil Jhalrapatan (Partly) – (I) ILRC Asnawar

Note:

1. Wards of Ajmer Municipal Council are as per 18th March, 2005. Department of Local Self Government has reorganized wards of Municipal Council, Ajmer vide notification dated 19th March, 2005.

2. Municipal Board, Abu Road has been reorganized by including village Manpur and village Akrabhatta of Patwar Circle Manpur and village Tartoli (Partly) of Patwar Circle Morthala. These two patwar circles are part of ILRC Mount Abu. Whereas Municipal Board , Abu Road is part of ILRC Abu Road. This change can be incorporated by revising the extent of Reodar or Mount Abu. Alternatively it can be considered at the time publication and can be incorporated in final notification.

3. All other administrative units are as per date of notification.

TABLE – B

PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES AND THEIR PROPOSED EXTENT

S. No. and Name of Parliamentary Constituency

EXTENT IN TERMS OF ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY

1-Ganganagar (SC) 1-Sadulsahar, 2-Ganganagar, 3-Karanpur, 4-Suratgarh, 5-Raisinghnagar (SC), 7-Sangaria, 8-Hanumangarh and 9-Pilibanga (SC)

2-Bikaner (SC) 6-Anupgarh (SC), 12-Khajuwala (SC), 13-Bikaner West, 14-Bikaner East, 15-Kolayat, 16-Lunkaransar, 17-Dungargarh and 18-Nokha

3-Churu 10-Nohar, 11-Bhadra, 19-Sadulpur, 20-Taranagar, 21-Sardarshahar, 22-Churu, 23-Ratangarh and 24-Sujangarh (SC)

4-Jhunjhunu 25-Pilani (SC), 26-Surajgarh, 27-Jhunjhunu, 28-Mandawa, 29-Nawalgarh, 30-Gudha, 31-Khetri and 32-Fatehpur

5-Sikar 33-Lachhmangarh, 34-Dhod (SC), 35-Sikar, 36-Dantaramgarh, 37-Khandela, 38-Neem Ka Thana, 39-Srimadhopur and 43-Chomu

6-Jaipur Rural 40-Kotputli, 41-Viratnagar, 42-Shahpura, 44-Phulera, 46-Jhotwara, 47-Amber, 48-Jamwaramgarh (ST) and 58-Chaksu (SC)

7-Jaipur 49-Hawa Mahal, 50-Vidhyadhar Nagar, 51-Civil Lines, 52-Kishan Pole, 53-Adarsh Nagar, 54-Malviya Nagar, 55-Sanganer and 56-Bagru (SC)

8-Alwar 59-Tizara, 60-Khairthal, 61-Mandawar, 62-Behror, 63-Bansur, 65-Alwar Rural (SC), 66-Alwar Urban, 67-Ramgarh

9-Bharatpur (SC) 69 - Kathumar (SC), 70-Kaman, 71-Nagar, 72- Deeg – Kumher, 73-Bharatpur, 74-Nadbai, 75-Weir (SC) and 76-Bayana (SC)

10-Dholpur-Karauli (SC) 77-Baseri (SC), 78-Bari, 79-Dholpur, 80-Rajakhera, 81-Todabhim (ST), 82-Hindaun (SC), 83-Karauli and 84-Sapotra (ST)

11-Dausa (ST) 57-Bassi (ST), 64-Thanagazi, 68-Rajgarh (ST), 85-Bandikui, 86-Mahuwa, 87-Sikrai (SC), 88-Dausa and 89-Lalsot (ST)

12-Sawai Madhopur-Tonk

90-Gangapur, 91-Bamanwas (ST), 92-Sawai Madhopur, 93-Khandar (SC), 94-Malpura, 95-Niwai (SC), 96-Tonk and 97-Deoli

13-Ajmer 45-Dudu (SC), 98-Kishangarh, 99-Pushkar, 100-Ajmer North, 101-Ajmer South (SC), 102-Nasirabad, 104-Masuda and 105-Kekri

14-Nagaur 106-Ladnun, 107-Deedwana, 108-Jayal (SC), 109-Nagaur, 112-Degana, 113-Makrana, 114-Parbatsar and 115-Nawan

15-Pali 110-Khinwsar, 111-Merta (SC), 116-Jaitaran, 117-Sojat (SC), 118-Pali, 125-Osian, 126-Bhopalgarh (SC) and 131-Bilara (SC)

16-Jodhpur 122-Phalodi, 123-Lohawat, 124-Shergarh, 127-Sardarpura,

128-Jodhpur, 129-Soorsagar, 130-Luni and 133-Pokran 17-Barmer 132-Jaisalmer, 134-Sheo, 135-Barmer, 136-Baytoo, 137-

Pachpadra, 138-Siwana, 139-Gudhamalani and 140-Chohtan (SC)

18-Jalore 141-Ahore, 142-Jalore (SC), 143-Bhinmal, 144-Sanchore, 145-Raniwara, 146-Sirohi, 147-Pindwara-Abu (ST) and 148-Reodar (SC)

19-Udaipur (ST) 149-Gogunda (ST), 150-Jhadol (ST), 151-Kherwara (ST), 152-Udaipur Rural (ST), 153-Udaipur, 156-Salumber (ST), 157-Dhariawad (ST) and 159-Aspur (ST)

20-Banswara (ST) 158-Dungarpur (ST), 160-Sagwara (ST), 161-Chorasi (ST), 162-Ghatol (ST), 163-Garhi (ST), 164-Banswara (ST), 165-Bagidora (ST) and 166-Kushalgarh (ST)

21-Chittorgarh 154-Mavli, 155-Vallabh Nagar, 167-Kapasan (SC), 168-Begun, 169-Chittorgarh, 170-Nimbahera, 171-Bari Sadri and 172-Pratapgarh (ST)

22-Bhilwara 103-Beawar, 119-Marwar Junction, 120-Bali, 121-Sumerpur, 173-Bhim, 174-Kumbhalgarh, 175-Rajsamand and 176-Nathdwara

23-Rajsamand 177-Asind, 178-Mandal, 179-Sahara, 180-Bhilwara, 181-Shahpura (SC), 182-Jahazpur, 183-Mandalgarh and 184-Hindoli

24-Kota 185-Keshoraipatan (SC), 186-Bundi, 187-Pipalda, 188-Digod, 189-Kota North, 190-Kota South, 191-Ladpura and 192-Ramganj Mandi (SC)

25-Jhalawar 193-Anta, 194-Kishanganj (ST), 195-Baran (SC), 196-Chhabra, 197-Dag (SC), 198-Jhalrapatan, 199-Khanpur and 200-Manohar Thana

DISSENTING PROPOSALS RECEIVED FROM ASSOCIATES MEMBERS

(I) 3 Vidhyakpuri,

Jaipur

Mahadev Singh Ph: 0141-2368607

Member Vill. & P.O. Dulhaepura,

Legislative Assembly, Rajasthan Hond (Khandela)

Distt. –Sikar (Rajasthan)

Ph: 01575-242305

011-23052002

22 July, 2005

Shri Kuldip Singh Ji,

Chairman,

Delimitation Commission,

Nirvachan Bhawan,

Govt. of India, New Delhi.

In connection with partial modification in election member no. 182 of Rajasthan

Legislative Assembly 23-Bhilwara Parliamentary Constituency.

Sir,

The patwar circles Mansha, Gankali and Jawal of Revenue Inspector Circle

Nandrai; situated in Bhilwada district and are in Jahajpur and Mandalgarh

constituencies of Rajasthan Legislative Assembly are near and close to Jahajpur.

These are included in Mandalgarh assembly constituency in the proposed delimitation

draft, which should remain in Jahajpur itself because of the geographical proximity

contrary of this, if these are included in Mandalgarh assembly constituency; it will not be

suitable for public, public representatives and by looking at the map. Mansha and Haguli

were already in Jahajpur assembly constituency from the point of view, distance, means

of communication and administrative facility and Jawal Assembly constituency was in

Shahpura. Now that Shahpura Bande, Tehsil has become an assembly constituency

together then it will be appropriate to include Jawal in Jahajpur.

Sawaipur, Banka Khera and Badla Patwar Circle were already in Badliyas

Revenue Inspector Circle because of the geographical location of Kothari River and

administrative facility. These are rather very close to manbalgarh, in sfead of Jahajpur

because of Kothari River, Communication facility with villages and administrative facility.

By looking at the map, it proves its authenticity that these three Patwar Circle should be

included in Mandalpur instead of Jahajpur Assembly constituency, which will be in the

interest of the people and of the state. Because of some discrepancy in the Revenue

Inspector circle District collector and Revenue division sent amendment proposal to the

state government, but due to the restriction of the Delimitation Commission, decisions

were not taken. According to the names, based upon the grouth of population in the

eastern regions by including adjoining areas, and not distancing earlier included aeas

according to the names it will not be appropriate. So in the present proposal, my above

ancluded proposal are objection considered as my and dissent note Manse Patwar

circle, gahuli and Jawal Nandrai Revenue Inspector circle should be reparated from

Jahajpur Assembly Constituency and be included became of geographical compactness

and I present my opinion and recommendation that due to the closeness and transport

inconvenience of Kottari river, the Patwar circles of Revenue Inspector Circle of

Sawaipur, Banka Kheda Badla should be reparated rom Jahajpur Assembly

Constituency and included to Mandalgarh area.

(I have my consent in publishing this objection)

Yours Sincerely,

Sd/-

Mahadev Singh

Member Assembly Constituency

3 Vidhyakpuri,

Jaipur

Mahadev Singh Ph: 0141-2368607

Member Vill. & P.O. Dulhaepura,

Legislative Assembly, Rajasthan Hond (Khandela)

Distt. –Sikar (Rajasthan)

Ph: 01575-242305

Respected Chief Election Commissioner,

Govt. of India

New Delhi.

Subject:- Regarding redelimitation of Sarlarpura Legislative assembly situated in

Jodhpur district of the State of Rajasthan.

Sir,

On the subject stated above it is requested that three legislative assembly

constituencies come under Jodhpur City in Jodhpur district of the State of Rajasthan.

Naming ‘Jodhopu City,’ ‘Sursagar’ and ‘Sardarpura’. In the Draft working Paper sent

recently by the Delimitation Commission. It is seen that Jodhpur ward No. 60 has been

deloted from Saldarpura Assembly area. Neither Congress nor BJP proposed to delete

the ward and nor it is geographically practical to delete this area from Sardarpura.

As per the population viewpoint if ward No. 60 is included in Sursagar then the

population of Sursagar becomes 313172 and the population of Sardarpura remaining

only 268649 that seems quite impractical. Therefore ward No. 60 should be in

Sardarpura legislative assembly area by deleting from Sursagar legislative area so that

as per the Original proposal of the Commission the population of Sardarpur becomes

285356 and of Sursagar becomes 296465 that seems legitimate and logical.

This objection of have should be published along with the Draft working paper.

Sd/-

(Mahadev Singh)

(II) The Chairman, Delimitation Commission of India, New Delhi.

Note of Dissent for Lok Sabha Constituencies of 6-Jaipur Rural, 8-Alwar and 11-Dausa

Under Section 9 (2) (a) of Delimitation Act 2002 Sir, Associate Members of INC want to divert your kind attention towards the blunder done by Commission in draft working paper released on 8th July, 2005 regarding three parliamentary constituencies named as 6-Jaipur Rural, 8-Alwar and 11-Dausa. The proposed Delimitation of above Lok Sabha Constituencies is not according the provision section 9 (1) (a) of Delimitation Act and your Guideline. The change of Assembly segments between above three Lok Sabha Constituencies is neither logical nor fair because of the following reasons :-

Lok Sabha Constituency 6-Jaipur Rural 1. Delimitation Commission has deleted AC-64-Thanagaji and AC-63-Bansur from Lok

Sabha constituency 6-Jaipur Rural and included AC-48-Jamwaramgarh (SC) and 58-Chaksu (SC).

AC-58-Chaksu has no connectivity with any assembly segments of 6-Jaipur Rural. This will be an island for other seven segments of Lok Sabha constituency 6-Jaipur Rural.

2. AC-64-Thanagaji and AC-63-Bansur can not be separated because they are constituted and formed with common Tehsils and RICs of Alwar District.

Lok Sabha Constituency 8-Alwar

1. Delimitation Commission has changed the compositions of Lok Sabha Constituency 8- Alwar by deleting AC-59-Rajgarh (ST) and included AC-63-Bansur. It is against the provisions and guideline of Delimitation Act. 2. Rajgarh was been the Capital of the erstwhile Alwar State. The first King of the Alwar

Dynasty Maharao Pratap Singh founded Rajgarh in 1764 AD and built palaces and Dams in this area. This is also native place of Famous Freedom Fighter Pt. Bhawani Sahay Sharma, who was the right hand of Chandra Shekhar Azad. Since 1950. AC-Rajgarh was and is part of Alwar Lok Sabha Constituency. It is adjacent to Alwar District Headquarter and socially, geographically, historically a part of Alwar. Therefore we request you to keep AC-Rajgarh in Lok Sabha Constituency Alwar

3. Thanagaji and Bansur Assembly segments are geographically adjacent and well integrated so they should be kept together.

Lok Sabha Constituency 11-Dausa

1. Delimitation Commission has changed the compositions of Lok Sabha Constituency 11-Dausa by deliting AC-Chaksu (SC) & AC-Jamwaramgarh (ST). Commission has included AC-Thanagaji & AC-Rajgarh (ST) in this parliament constituencies. It is against the provisions and guideline of Delimitation Act, because geographically and administratively AC-Thanagaji & AC-Rajgarh do not give compactness. The % of ST in previously proposed Lok Sabha constituency Dausa was 26.27%. If Commission wants to increase the % of ST in this Lok Sabha Constituecny than AC-Jamwaramgarh can also be included but AC-Chaksu which is not having any connectivity with Lok Sabha Constituency 6-Jaipur Rural can only be included in LS 11-Dausa.

In effect therefore Chaksu should be a part of Parliamentary Constituency Dausa

and Rajgarh to the remain PC Alwar.

Thanking you,

Yours Sincerely, Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

(Mahadev Singh) (Shish Ram Ola) (Shiv Charan Mathur) Associate Member Associate Member Associate Member

(III) The Chairman, Delimitation Commission of India, New Delhi.

Note of Dissent for Assembly Constituencies of Bikaner District Under Section 9(2)(a) of Delimitation Act 2002

Sir Some inadvestant omissions occurred with regard to few wards in 13-Bikaner West and 14-Bikaner East assembly constituencies of Bikaner District have been

corrected by Draft Working paper of the commission wide letter no. 282/RJ/2005, dated

8th July, 2005. But still the proposed delimitation of AC Bikaner West, AC Bikaner East,

AC Nokha & AC Kolayat has not been done according to the provisions of section 9 (1)

(a). We the Associates Members of INC & BJP got Consensus on Amendment

proposals of AC 13-Bikaner West & 14-Bikaner East and submitted them in the last

meeting of Commission held on 10th June, 2005 at New Delhi as under :-

1. The Wards of old Bikaner City are complicatedly constituted. So many houses of

Old City are having common wall put they have been split in different Wards. To

remove this error Ward No. 3, 4, 5, 6, 18, 19 & 20 may kindly be included in AC

21-Bikaner East and Ward No. 13, 28, 43, 51, 52, 54 & 55 may kindly be deleted.

In same manner Ward No. 13, 28, 43, 51, 52, 54 & 55 may kindly included in AC

20-Bikaner West & Ward No. 3, 4, 5, 6, 18, 19, & 20 may kindly be deleted

2. The division of above ACs proposed by our amendment proposal is also based

on Railway line situated between them.

The Commission has partly accepted our suggestion by shifting Ward No. 54, 55 in AC-Bikaner West and Ward No. 5, 6 & 20 in AC-Bikaner East. The delimitation commission has Suomotto added Ward No. 35 in AC-Bikaner West and Ward No. 22 in AC-Bikaner East. It was not demanded by INC and BJP.

Therefore we request you kindly include Ward No. 13, 28, 43, 51 & 52

in AC-Bikaner West and delete them from AC-Bikaner East. In same manner kindly also include Ward No. 3, 4, 18 & 19 in AC Bikaner East and delete them from AC-Bikaner West.

Kindly also delete RIC Panchu from AC-Nokha & it should be

included in AC-Kolayat, to remove the error of deviation of % in above Acs.

You are requested to kindly publish our note of dissent along with the draft

proposals of Commission.

Thanking you,

Yours Sincerely, Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-


(IV)

Hon’ble Justice Kuldeep Singh Ji, The Chairman, Delimitation Commission of India,

New Delhi

Subject :- Note of Dissent Under Section 9 (2) (a) of Delimitation Act. Regarding Assembly Constituencies of District Churu, Rajasthan.

Sir,

INC Associate Members submitted their amendment proposals in the meeting

held on 10th June, 2005 as under :-

Tehsil Sardarshahar is having 304373 population. It should not be split

Delimitation of this District should be started from AC-Sardarshahar, which is the north

of District Churu. After completion of this Assembly Constituency AC-Taranagar which

is situated in North-East should be constituted & then AC-Sadulpur, AC-Churu, AC-

Ratangarh & AC-Sujangarh should be formed. AC-Sujangarh is situated in the South of

District Churu. The description of proposed amendments was as under in detail :-

AC-Sardarsahar : Tehsil Sardarsahar : Total Population – 304373

AC- Taranagar : Tehsil Taranagar, Tehsil Rajgarh (Partly), RIC Dadarewa, RIC Dokwa,

Tehsil Churu (Partly), RIC Khiwasar Excluding PC Ghantel. Total

Population – 268970

AC- Sadulpur : Tehsil Rajgarh (Partly), RIC Rajgarh including Municipal Board, RIC

Hameerwas Dara, RIC Ragha Chhoti, RIC Sankhoo, RIC Chainpura

Chhota, RIC Sidhmukh. Total Population - 262118

AC – Churu : Tehsil Churu (Partly), RIC Churu including Churu Municipal Board and

Ratannagar Municipal Board, RIC Dudwa Khara, RIC Naksasar, PC

Ghantel of RIC Khiwasar, Tehsil Ratangarh (Partly) – RIC Ratangarh

excluding PC Ratangarh and Municipal Board Ratangarh. Total Population

– 267920

AC- Ratangarh : Tehsil Ratangarh (Partly), RIC Golsar, RIC Menasar, RIC Rajaldesar,

PC Ratangarh with Ratangarh Municipal Board, Tehsil Sujangarh (Partly),

RIC Chhapar, RIC Khuri. Total Population – 294897.

AC – Sujangarh (SC) : Tehsil Sujangarh (Partly) excluding RIC Chhapar and RIC Khuri

& Chhapar Municipal Board. Total Population – 297761

In the meeting of commission held on 10th June, 2005 it was agreed by Hon’ble Commission that Tehsil Sardarshahar will be kept intact and the process of delimitation in Churu District will be started from Tehsil Sardarshahar which is the top North of this District according to revenue record. But the above agreed facts are not followed in the draft working proposal released on 8th July, 2005. The draft working proposal has also ignored the Law & Rules regarding deviation of % in Churu by keeping +10.31 % of deviation in AC-21-Sardarshahar. A revised working paper released by the Commission in the month of May have been also ignored without any reason.

Therefore we request you kindly accept our above amendment proposal and keep intact Tehsil Sardarshahar which is the top north of Churu District. It also provides better geographical compactness, road connectivity and administrative units in comparison to your draft proposal. This may be recorded as a note of dissent for publication from our side.

Thanking you,

Yours Sincerely,

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-


(V) The Chairman, Delimitation Commission of India, New Delhi.

Note of Dissent for Assembly Constituencies of Jaipur District Under Section 9(2)(a) of Delimitation Act 2002

Sir Associates Members of INC has submitted following amendments before

Commission on 10th June, 2005 regarding three Rural Assembly Constituencies of

District Jaipur and five Urban Constituencies of Jaipur City.

Small amendment proposal in AC-Phulera, AC-Dudu & AC-Jhotwara 1. Due to Sambhar Lake there is no road connectivity of PC Korsinha, PC

Habaspura, PC Dobari & PC Chapari of RIC Narayana & PC Shama ki Dani of

RIC sambhar with AC-44 Phulera. Almost 8 months in the year these PCs are

full of mud. To reach in Villages of above PCs you have to come from AC-45

Dudu. The above PCs are very well connected with AC-45 Dudu. Therefore it is

requested to include about PCs in AC-45 Dudu. It will also remove the error of %

of deviation in AC-45-Dudu.

2. PC Bhojpurkalan, PC Murlipura of RIC Jobner & PC Shama ki Dani of RIC

Karansar can be included in AC-44 Phulera & deleted from AC-46 Jhotwara. It

will also equalize the % of deviation.

3. The present Phulera AC is physically like a DUMBELL. The above amendment

proposal will also correct the physical features of AC-Phulera and it will also give

geographical compactness. It will also provide connectivity and means of

communication.

Single Ward exchange in five ACs of Jaipur City 1. Hon’ble Commission has proposed seven assembly segments in Jiapur Nagar

Nigam area. But these seven constituencies are not constituted according to the

guideline & rules of the delimitation commission. The main road of the city are

the base of dividing wards of Nagar Nigam, but the proposed constituencies of

Jaipur City are not formed accordingly. Few constituencies are unnecessarily

constituted very lengthy and they are not geographically compact. Specially AC-

Civil Lines is constituted very defectively and lengthy. It starts from Top South of

jaipur City and it ends at Top North of City, which is the Nargarh Hill. We are

suggesting a small amendment proposal of five assembly constituencies named

as AC-Civil Line, AC-Malviya Nagar, AC-Adarsh Nagar, AC-Kishanpole & AC-

Hawamahal in which inter exchange of a single ward has been suggested. It will

give physical compactness, better physical features, administrative unity & easy

road connectivity. The exchange of Ward are as under :-

AC Civil Line : Include Ward 16, Delite Ward 66

AC Hawamahal : Include Ward 66, Deliete Ward 64

AC Kishanpole : Include Ward 64, Delete Ward 50

AC Adarshnagar : Include Ward 50, Delete Ward 34

AC Malviya Nagar : Include Ward 34, Delete Ward 16

We hope that Commission will incorporate our amendment proposals given

above, otherwise you are requested to kindly publish our note of dissent along with the

draft proposals of Commission.

Thanking you,

Yours Sincerely,

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-


(VI) The Chairman, Delimitation Commission of India, New Delhi.

Note of Dissent for Assembly Constituencies of Bharatpur District Under Section 9(2)(a) of Delimitation Act 2002 Sir Associates Members of INC had submitted following amendment proposal before

Commission on 10th June, 2005 regarding four Rural Assembly Constituencies of

District Bharatpur.

1. District Bharatpur is one of the example which is having three different cultural

areas within the region. Kama & Nagar Tehsils are having Mave Culture & Brij

Culture. Whereas Tehsil Weir & Tehsil bayana are also having two different

cultures. We are suggesting exchange of single RICs in AC-75-Weir V/s AC-76-

Bayana & AC-70-Kaman V/s AC-71-Nagar. This amendment proposal is also

submitted looking to the geographical & physical compactness, connectivity,

administrative units and means of communication.

2. RIC Farso should be deleted from 75-Weir & included in 76-Bayana. RIC

Samodar should be deleted from 76-Bayana and it should be included in 75-

Weir. This small exchange of RIC will give physical & geographical compactness

to both Assembly constituencies.

3. RIC Raf is part of Panchayat Samiti Nagar. This RIC is adjourning with AC-

Nagar. Whereas RIC Pasta is situated very far from AC-Nagar and to reach RIC

Pasta you have to cross another Assembly constituency. It means it don’t have

direct connectivity. Hence we propose that RIC Ranf & RIC Pasda should inter

change between AC-Nagar & AC-Kaman.

The Associate Members of BJP also supported our above amendment proposals

in that meeting and they also agreed by submitting their written proposals. Your good

self also fully convinced with above amendment proposal and you have given

assurance to all the associate members that this will be considered. Even than

commission has not incorporated above amendments in draft proposal released on 8th

July, 2005. The proposals of draft working paper released on 8th July, 2005 regarding

AC-Kaman, AC-Nagar, AC-Weir and AC-Bayana are not according to the guideline and

section 9 (1) (a) of delimitation act. Therefore the above amendment proposals

submitted by associate members of INC and supported by BJP members should be

accepted by the commission.

We hope that Commission will incorporate our above amendment proposals in

the interest of Law and Citizens of Bharatpur District. Otherwise, you are requested to

kindly publish our note of dissent along with the draft proposals of Commission.

Thanking you,

Yours Sincerely,

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-


(VII) The Chairman, Delimitation Commission of India, New Delhi.

Note of Dissent for Assembly Constituencies of Dholpur District Under Section 9(2)(a) of Delimitation Act 2002 Sir

Associates Members of INC had submitted following amendment proposal before

Commission on 10th June, 2005 regarding two Rural Assembly Constituencies of District

Dholpur as under.

1. The present % of deviation of population in Bari & Baseri is +7.34% and –6.57%

respectively. In order to maintain the deference of % of deviation in AC-77-

Baseri (SC) and AC-78-Bari the PC Ibrahimpur, PC Bhimari, PC Sikarra & PC

Kuhawani of RIC Bari should be included in newly constituted AC-Baseri and

deleted from AC_Bari. All of above PCs are adjoining and adjacent with Tehsil

Baseri and is geographically compact. They are part of same panchayat samiti

and therefore, will be administratively suited to the people of the area.

2. AC-77Baseri (SC) can be connected with National Highway easily by including

four Patwar Circles of one RIC from AC-78-Bari. This small amendment will also

provide road connectivity to both Acs- (AC-Bari & AC-Baseri)

The Associate Members of BJP also supported our above amendment proposal.

Even than commission has not incorporated above amendments in draft proposal

released on 8th July, 2005. The proposals of draft working paper released on 8th July,

2005 regarding AC-Bari and AC-Baseri are not according to the guideline and section 9

(1) (a) of delimitation act. Therefore the above amendment proposals submitted by

associate members of INC and supported by BJP members should be accepted by the

commission.


the interest of Law and Citizens of Dholpur District. Otherwise, you are requested to


Thanking you,

Yours Sincerely,

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-


(VIII) The Chairman, Delimitation Commission of India, New Delhi.

Note of Dissent for Assembly Constituencies of Tonk District Under Section 9(2)(a) of Delimitation Act 2002

Sir

We have received your draft proposal dated 8th July, 2005. We have found that

Commission has deleted RIC Nasirda of Tehsil Devali from AC-Devali on the ground

that many villages of RIC Nasirda are covered under Bisalpur Water Project. We

strongly protest that Commission has arbitrarily shifted RIC Mor of Tehsil Todaraisingh

in Tonk. Associate Members of INC and BJP never suggested for this change.

Geographically and Administratively RIC Mor should remain with AC-94-Malpura, as it

was previously proposed by Commission in their Working Paper. The local citizens of

Malpura have raised their protest regarding inclusion of RIC Nasirda in AC-Malpura.

According to them the road connectivity from AC-Malpura with RIC nasirda is only

possible through entering AC-Kekri which is the segment of neighbour district Ajmer.

2. We also request you kindly change of the name 97-Devali as UNIARA-DEVALI.

Note of dissent for Loksabha Constituency – Sawaimadhopur-Tonk

In the draft working paper as against our suggestion commission has named PC-

Sawaimadhopur as PC Sawaimadhopur-Tonk. Whereas the associate members of INC

and BJP jointly suggested to change the name of this Parliamentary Constituency as

Tonk-Sawaimadhopur.

Tonk was separate princely state before freedom. Whereas Sawaimadhopur

district was a part of erstwhile Jaipur state. District Tonk is much larger in size and

population in comparison to district Sawaimadhopur. Therefore, we once again suggest

that the name of this Parliament Constituency should be corrected as Tonk-

Sawaimadhopur.


above otherwise, you are requested to kindly publish our note of dissent along with the


Thanking you,

Yours Sincerely,

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-


(IX) The Chairman, Delimitation Commission of India, New Delhi.

Note of Dissent for Assembly Constituencies of Pali District Under Section 9(2)(a) of Delimitation Act 2002

Sir

Associates Members of INC has submitted enclosed amendments before

commission on 10th June, 2005 regarding the Two Assembly Constituencies of District

Pali named as AC-116-Jaitaran and 117-Sojat (SC). Our proposal was based on the

Guideline and the provisions of Section 9 (1) (a) of Delimitation Act. We wanted to keep

reserve AC-Sojat for SC. Our proposal was as under :-

1. The revised proposal of Commission is partly accepted. AC-Jaitaran and AC-

Sojat are not constituted according to the guideline.

2. This District is also situated in the chain of Arawali Hills. AC Jaitaran and AC

Sojat are having different physical features due to large number of Arawali

mountains situated between them.

3. The maximum area of existing AC-Raipur which is dissolved in proposed working

paper of the commission should be retained in AC-Jaitaran.

4. Looking to the geographically compactness, Physical features and means of

communications (Road connectivity), we request you kindly exchange two RICs

between AC jaitaran and AC Sojat. Description is as under :- RIC Kotkirana of Tehsil Raipur should be included in AC-Sojat.

RIC Raipur partly-PC Birantiya Kalan, PC Hajiwas, PC Jhoontha, PC Leelamba,

PC Raipur-I & PC Raipur-II should be included in AC-108-Jaitaran.

5. The character of AC-Sojat (SC) and AC-Jaitaran will remain same.

BJP Members also submitted their amendment proposal in above meeting

regarding AC-Jaitaran and AC-Sojat, but they wanted to de reserve AC-Sojat.

Principally it was agreed by both the parties that none of the constituency will be

changed from reservation or de reservation.

Sir, We once again request you that looking to the geographically compactness,

physical features and means of communication (road connectivity) kindly exchange two

RICs as above stated between AC Jaitaran and AC Sojat (SC). We hope that

Commission will incorporate our amendment proposals given above otherwise, you are

requested to kindly publish our note of dissent along with the draft proposals of

Commission.

Thanking you,

Yours Sincerely,

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-


(X) The Chairman, Delimitation Commission of India, New Delhi.

Note of Dissent for Assembly Constituencies of Jodhpur District Under Section 9(2)(a) of Delimitation Act 2002 Sir Associates Members of INC had submitted following amendment proposal before

Commission on 10th June, 2005 regarding four Rural Assembly Constituencies of

District Jodhpur.

1. The delimitation of Assembly Constituencies in District Jodhpur has not been

drawn according to the guideline of delimitation commission and provisions of

section 9 (1) (a). The proposed constituencies are not geographically and

physically compact. All the sub-divisions of Jodhpur District has been split

maximum tehsils and panchayat samitis are unnecessarily broken. Therefore the

delimitation of this district should be reviewed and reformed.

2. We are proposing amendment in AC-Osian and AC-Lohawat as under :- 125-Osian Tehsil Osian (partly) RIC Mathania, RIC Osian, RIC cherai (Partly), RIC

Tinwari (Partly), RIC Aau (Partly) & RIC Bapini (Partly). 123-Lohawat :- RIC

Lohawat, RIC Bapini (Partly), RIC Cherai (Partly), RIC Chamu (Partly), RIC

Balesar (Partly), & RIC Tinwari (Partly)

3. In this proposal the existing boundaries of Assembly segments of this District can

be retained maximum.

4. Tehsil and RICs of Jodhpur District are formed defectively. Tehsils and

Panchayat Samatees are coterminous. They are lengthy and inserted in each

other. Hence to form compact Assembly segment it is necessary to split RICs

and Tehsils.

5. Administratively & from the point of view of compactness and communication this

amendment proposal is more perfect and suitable. This is in the public interest.

Amendment Proposal for AC-130-Luni 1. In the meeting of Commission dated 10th June, 2005 Associate Members of INC

and BJP consensually submitted their amendment proposal but Commission has

turned down them without any reason. In draft proposal the formation is not

according to the guideline and section 9 (1) (a) of the Act. AC Luni is having –

10.27% deviation which is against the rules. Therefore we once again request

you kindly accept a small amendment in AC-Luni. PC Kakelaw & PC Jaleli

Fauzdara of RIC Dangiawas (Tehsil Jodhpur) & PC Roodkali of RIC Bisalpur

(Tehsil Jodhpur) should be included in AC_Luni and deleted from AC-Bilara. If

commission do not agree to split two RICs than we suggest you to included RIC

Dangiawas in AC-Luni which the most adjacent RIC and geographically

compacted with proposed AC-Luni. The character of AC-Bilara and AC-Luni will

remain same.

Amendment Proposal for AC-124-Shergarh 1. Looking to the geographical compactness, administrative and revenue units,

means of communications, different cultural and population associate members

of INC and BJP jointly suggested amendment proposal of AC-Shergarh in the

meeting of commission dated 10th June, 2005 but commission has ignored it.

Now the proposed AC-Shergarh and AC-Lohawat are defectively formed and

they are not geographically compact. If commission do not want to split RICs

than we suggest a feasible amendment as under which is according to the

guideline and rules of delimitation act.

2. RIC Shetrawa should be deleted from AC-Lohawat & RIC Chamu should be

included in AC-Lohawat. RIC Shetrawa should be included in AC-Shergarh &

RIC Chamu should be deleted. The deviation of % will not exceed average

population of District.

Amendment Proposal for AC. Jodhpur, Sursagar and Sardarpura

Delimitation of above three Urban Assembly Constituencies was perfectly framed

in draft working paper previously released in the month of March, 2005 but now it has

been changed unnecessarily. Ward No. 60 of Nagar Nigam Jodhpur should remain with

AC Sardarpura as commission as previously proposed in working paper. The

population of Jodhpur City is sufficient to form three Urban Assembly segments. There

is no need to include the Rural population in these Acs.


above otherwise, you are requested to kindly publish our note of dissent along with the


Thanking you,

Yours Sincerely,

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-


(XI) The Chairman, Delimitation Commission of India, New Delhi.

Note of Dissent for two Assembly Constituencies of Baran District regarding AC 193-Anta and AC 195-Barna-SC

Under Section 9(2)(a) of Delimitation Act 2002 Sir The proposed delimitation of this district BARAN is against the guideline and

the provision of section 9 (1) (a) of delimitation act, 2002. It seems to have been

prepared to favor the ruling party of the state. There are SECTON OFFICER many

compositions in various Acs which either have no connectivity or they are inter injected

in each other. The assembly constituencies of District Baran as proposed in the draft

proposal are geography defective administratively no-convenient. They are neither

logical nor fair. Commission have Delimitated AC 195-Baran with intention to keep this

segment reserved for SC resulting AC Anta as de-reserved.

To remove these anomalies and errors, we are proposing the amendment

proposal regarding AC 193-Anta and AC 195-Baran, which comprise all Tehsils & RICs

inducted. It is having better connectivity and better geographical and administrative

compactness. Similarly, our proposed amendments relate to the Assembly segments of

District Baran looking at the geographical, physical, social, cultural and administrative

situations. In our proposal we have kept intact the SDO area, Panchayat Samiti area.

Less number of Tehsils & RICs have been split in our proposals. It is better-compacted

proposal. The proposed amendments are as under :-

2001 Population No & Name of

Assembly

Constituency

Extent of

Constituency

Tehsil/RIC/

Town

Town SCs STs

% of

SCs

% of

STs

% of

Deviation

193-Anta or

Atru (SC)

Tehsil Atru 132944 27293 24457

Tehsil Anta 103835 21801 9354

Tehsil Baran

(partly

- - -

RIC Bamala 20035 5359 4580

Total

256814 54453 38391 21.20 14.94 0.54

195-Baran Tehsil Mangrol 93550 16215 19908

Tehsil Baran

(Partly

RIC Baran

including

Baran

Municipal

109557 23608 8651

Board

RIC Fatehpur 28044 7881 3959

RIC Koyala 24171 4327 4690

Total 255322 52031 37208 20.37 14.57 -0.04

We would request your honor to accept above amendments, in case, you do not

accept them then please publish our note of dissent along with the draft proposals of

Commission.

Thanking you,

Yours Sincerely,

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-


(XII)

The Chairman, Delimitation Commission of India, New Delhi.

Note of Dissent for Assembly Constituencies of Bharatpur District Under Section 9(2)(a) of Delimitation Act 2002 Sir Associates Members of BJP & INC has submitted following amendment proposal

before Commission on 16th June, 2005 regarding four Rural Assembly Constituencies of

District Bharatpur.

1. District Bharatpur is one of the example who is having three different cultural

areas within the region. Kama & Nagar Tehsils are having Mave Culture & Brij

Culture. Whereas Tehsil Weir & Tehsil Bayana are also having two different

cultures. We are suggesting exchange of single RICs in AC-75-weir V/s AC-76-

Bayana & AC-70-Kaman V/s AC-71-Nagar. This amendment proposal is also

submitted looking to the geographical & physical compactness. Connectivity,

administrative units and means of communication.

2. RIC farso should be deleted from 75-Weir & included in 76-Bayana. RIC

Samodar should be deleted from 76-Bayana and it should be included in 75-

Weir. This small exchange of RIC will give physical & geographical compactness

to both Assembly constituencies.

3. RIC Raf is part of Panchayat Samiti Nagar. This RIC is adjourning with AC-

Nagar. Whereas RIC Pasta is situated very far from AC-Nagar and to reach RIC

Pasta you have to cross another Assembly constituency. It means it don’t have

direct connectivity. Hence we proposed that RIC Ranf & RIC Pasda should be

inter exchange between AC-Nagar & AC-Kaman.

The Associate Members of INC also supported our above amendment proposals

in that meeting and they also agreed by submitting their written proposals. Your good

self also fully convened with above amendment proposal and you have given assurance

to all the associate members that this will be considered. Even than commission has

not incorporated above amendments in draft proposal released on 8th July, 2005. We

are unable to understand why this amendment proposal commonly agreed by both the

parties has been turned down. The proposals of draft working paper released on 8th

July, 2005 regarding AC-Kaman. AC-Nagar, AC-Weir and AC-Bayana are not according

to the guideline and section 9 (1) (a) of delimitation act. Therefore the above

amendment proposals submitted by associate members of INC and supported by BJP

members should be accepted by the commission.


the interest of Law and Citizens of Bharatpur District. Otherwise, you are requested to


Thanking you,

Yours Sincerely,

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

(Mana Lal Bansiwal) (Ram Singh Kaswan) (Ghanshyam Tiwari) Associate Member Associate Member Associate Member

20th July, 2005

(XIII)

Kailash Meghwal 44, Ashoka Road, N.D.

Member of Parliament Ph. 23327787

(Lok Sabha) Mb. 9869180209

Secretary,

Delimitation Commission, Rajasthan

New Delhi-110001.

Kind attention of Shri Shangara Ram

I would like to draw your kind attention regarding of Delimitation Act 2002 of 33

that Delimitation Act 2002 (Part-2) will do delimitation according to the Act of

Parliament, Census of 2004, and by the section 5 of the Act No. 3 of 2004; from 31-10-

2003 according to the figures of Census as ascertained in the Census and keeping in

view the provisions of the Constitution and Act specified in Section-8 and the following

provisions, Viz.-

(a) All the constituencies will be geographically compact areas and from next page

their natural textures the existing borders of administrative units, communication

facilities and public facilities will have to be kept in mind while doing their delimitation.

(b) The delimitation of every assembly constituency will be done in such a manner

that they will come completely within one Parliamentary Constituency.

On the basis of above norms the proposals regarding Tonk segment of

Parliamentary Constituency, which were earlier proposed by you in which the R.I. circle

more of Todaraysingh was included in the Malpura Assembly Constituency which was

according to the norms of Delimitation Commission and no change was necessary. But

the proposal has been changed for which I am sacking its dismissal. The changed area

of the present Malpura assembly constituency in which R.I. Circle Nasrda has been

added with Malpura, in place of R.I. Circle more, should be cancelled. Because –

(1) This area of Nasirda is not connected to Malpura. This area is about 80 km. Far

away from Malpura, whereas more, the area in the east is only 18 km. Away from

Malpura.

(2) The area of R.I. circle Nasirda comes under Devali Tahsil and its Police Station,

Court and Panchayat Committee also comes under it. The people are also directly

connected to Devali. Therefore connecting this area to Malpura would be against the

natural quality standards of Delimitation Commission, borders prevailing the

administrative units, communication facilities, public facilities and variations the

geographical difference. So, these changed boundaries should be cancelled and the

proposed in its original form made by the Delimitation Commission in the primary level,

in which more of the Toda Rai Singh was attached to Malpura should be kept precisely

as it was.

Hence in the implementation of the public interest it is requested to the

Delimitation Commission to make amendment to include the same R.I. circle in Malpura

Assembly Constituency and oblige

Yours Sincerely,

Sd/-

(Kailash Meghwal)

Member

Delimitation Commission

Rajasthan.

(XIV)

Kailash Meghwal 44, Ashoka Road, N.D.

Member of Parliament Ph. 23327787

(Lok Sabha) Mb. 9869180209

Secretary,

Delimitation Commission, Rajasthan

New Delhi-110001.

Subject:- To change the name of “Parliamentary Constituency Sawai Madhopur” as

“Parliamentary Constituency Tonk” and its Headquarter to be Tonk-

regarding.

Sir,

You are requested to pass the order to change the name of

“Parliamentary Constituency Sawai madhopur” Seat in Rajasthan, created by the

Commission at present; as “Parliamentary Constituency Tonk”. Because :-

1. As far as geographical area is concerned, Tonk district is larger than

Sawai Madhopur district. The area of Tonk district is 7194 sq.km. whereas the area of

Sawai Madhopur district is only 5513 sq.km.

2. According to the census of 2001, the population of Tonk district is also

more than that of Mathopur district. According to the published figures of the population

of 2001, the population of Tonk district is 12, 11, 671 whereas the population of Sawai

Madhopur district is only 11, 17, 057.

3. The extension of voters in Tonk district is in 1089 Villages. Whereas there

are only 794 Villages in Sawai Madhopur, which is very much less in number than that

of Tonk district.

4. The distance of Tonk, from Jaipur city, the capital of Rajasthan is 100 km,

whereas Sawai Madhopur is situated 175 km. Far away from the capital i.e. Jaipur.

5. Tonk City is situated in National Highway no. 12, whereas Sawai

Madhopur City is not connected with any National Highway.

6. There is “Municipal Council” in Tonk City, whereas, there is only

“Municipality” in Sawai Madhopur from administrative point of view.

7. Tonk City has been a historical City and its area is progressive in the

production of chilli, mustard and carpet and is having industries of bidi and leather far

export also. Whereas Sawai Madhopur district is comparatively not well to do from

industrial point of view.

8. Parliamentary Constituency, Tonk has been reserved for Schedule tribes

till now, but, now it is being changed in general category. From this point of view, the

population of the people of general category in Tonk district is 8, 32, 696, whereas in

Sawai Madhopur district it is 6, 52, 755 which is less than that of Tonk district.

9. According to the present proposals if the Parliamentary Constituency is

named as “Sawai Madhopur Parliamentary Constituency” and its headquarter is fixed at

Sawai Madhopur, then this city will have the distance of 205 km. From assembly

constituency Malpura, 145 km. From assembly constituency Dewali and 110 km. From

Niwai city of assembly constituency Niwai; of Tonk district.

10. The constituencies of Madhopur district were earlier included in the very

“Parliamentary Constituency Tonk” in the first general election held in 1952 and the

general election held after that i.e. in 1957 in the counting.

Therefore keeping in view the above facts, your are requested to give your

acceptance to change the name of “Parliamentary Constituency Sawai Mdhopur” as

“Parliamentary Constituency Tonk”.

Yours Sincerely,

Sd/-

(Kailash Meghwal)

Associate member,

Delimitation Commission, Rajasthan.

Further, please get it published.

ORDER NO. 12 - Election Commission of India – Dudu (SC) 1. Tehsil Dudu 2. Tehsil Phagi (Partly)...

Documents

Transcript of ORDER NO. 12 - Election Commission of India – Dudu (SC) 1. Tehsil Dudu 2. Tehsil Phagi (Partly)...