Oracle vs SAP Comparison

download Oracle vs SAP Comparison

of 3

Transcript of Oracle vs SAP Comparison

  • 7/29/2019 Oracle vs SAP Comparison

    1/3

    ROI ANALYSIS YOU CAN TRUSTTM

    Comparing the Real ROIfrom Oracle and SAP

    This document was developed by Nucleus Research at the request

    of Oracle to help its salespeople and customers understand and

    compare in context the results of two Nucleus Research Real ROI

    reports: #D23 The Real ROI from SAP, and #E36 The Real ROI

    from Oracle E-Business Suite.

    THE NUCLEUS REPORTSNucleus analysts independently conducted reference checks of 22

    Oracle E-Business Suite customers and 21 SAP customers. The

    customers were identified from the customer case studies and success

    stories on each companys Web site.

    WHOS NUCLEUS?

    Nucleus Research is an independent IT analyst firm established in 2000

    to help companies evaluate the return on investment from technology

    projects. Nucleus has published thousands of independent ROI case

    studies and helped hundreds of companies evaluate their own business

    cases for ERP and CRM deployments. Nucleus is the only IT analyst

    firm registered with NASBA, the National Association of State Boards of

    Accountancy, for its unbiased and credible IT ROI methodology.

    WHO PAID FOR THESE REPORTS?

    The original reports were developed completely independently by

    Nucleus for its user subscription service. Oracle learned about the

    reports after they were published and acquired reprint rights from

    Nucleus.

    ROI AND PAYBACK

    65 percent of Oracle E-Business Suite customers achieved a positive

    return on investment after an average deployment time of 3.1 years.

    Nucleus estimated that more than 90 percent of Oracle applications

    customers could expect a positive ROI within 5 years.

    43 percent of SAP customers had achieved a positive return on

    investment after an average deployment time of 2.8 years. Nucleus

    was not able to estimate an expected payback period for SAP because

    many companies had no clear expectations of when they would achieve

    a positive ROI and the expected payback period could not be project

    based on current realization of benefits.

    2005 Nucleus Research, Inc.

    Reproduction in whole or in part without

    written permission is prohibited. Nucleus

    Research is the leader in the return on

    investment analysis of technology. Please

    visit www.NucleusResearch.com.

  • 7/29/2019 Oracle vs SAP Comparison

    2/3

    Nucleus Research, Inc. F36www.NucleusResearch.com Page 2

    Whats ROI?

    Return on investment is calculated by dividing the average annual net

    benefits over a 3 year period by the initial costs:

    (Y1+Y2+Y3)/3

    initial cost

    Benefits include both direct cost savings and productivity and other

    indirect benefits; costs include software, hardware, personnel,

    consulting, and training.

    DEPLOYMENT SIZE

    The range of deployment size for Oracle was from 20 users to 3400

    users; for SAP, the range was from 2 to 5000.

    Deployment Expectations

    64 percent of Oracle deployments were completed on time versus 71

    percent of SAP deployments.

    55 percent of Oracle deployments were completed on budget versus 52

    percent of SAP deployments.

    BENEFITS

    Respondents indicated that

    48 percent of Oracle customers increased user productivity.

    39 percent of Oracle customers improved financial management.

    26 percent of Oracle customers reduced IT costs.

    SAP customers received benefits from increased productivity, improved

    operations management, and improved information organization and

    access; however, the majority of companies found those returns were

    not significant enough to deliver a positive ROI. The benefit totals broke

    down as follows:

    50 percent of SAP customers increased user productivity.

    35 percent of SAP customers improved information organization

    and access.

    30 percent of SAP customers improved operations management.

    COST COMPARISONS

    Initial costs Oracle average Oracle median SAP average SAP med

    Software 1,729,688 550,000 1,853,333 1,000

    Consulting 2,301,429 787,500 3,637,039 850

    Hardware 284,500 62,500 882,000 345

    Personnel 675,000 750,000 2,480,000 806

    Training 263,088 57,072 1,271,550 137

    Total 5,253,705 2,207,072 10,123,922 3,139,

    Ongoing costs Oracle average Oracle median SAP average SAP med

    Softwaremaintenance

    591,924 330,000 1,016,616 637

    Personnel 1,590,000 900,000 3,360,000 1,4403-year TCO 7,435,629 3,437,072 14,500,538 5,216,

    KEY POINTS

    Costs

    Oracles average costs were 48 percent lower than SAPs.

    Oracles median costs were 29 percent lower than SAPs.

    Oracles average 3-year TCO was 48% lower than SAPs.

  • 7/29/2019 Oracle vs SAP Comparison

    3/3

    Nucleus Research, Inc. F36www.NucleusResearch.com Page 3

    Oracles median 3-year TCO was 34 percent lower than SAPs.

    PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS

    It takes fewer internal personnel to deploy Oracle: an average of

    81 man-months of internal personnel were needed for Oracle,

    compared to an average of372 for SAP.

    It takes less training to deploy Oracle: an average of27 hours

    of training for Oracle, compared to an average of49 hours forSAP.

    IS ORACLE MORE EXPENSIVE PER USER FOR SOFTWARE AND

    CONSULTING?

    No. Because the average Oracle deployment studied was smaller than

    the average SAP deployment studied, customers didnt get as much of a

    volume discount on software and the consulting costs are fixed, not

    variable.

    ROI CHALLENGES

    SAP customers faced three key challenges:

    Lack of breadth and repeatability. Companies werent able to

    deploy to as many users as they had hoped, or impact enoughprocesses positively on a frequent basis, to achieve enough

    benefits for a positive ROI.

    High personnel costs.

    Excessive customization. Extensive customization slowed

    deployment and increased consulting costs.

    Oracle customers faced the following key challenges:

    Need for more thorough vetting of outside consultants. More

    rigorous investigation of all members of the consulting team

    would have lessened delays companies experienced in

    completing the deployment of Oracle applications.

    Buying ahead of business need. Some companies had

    applications sitting on the shelf as they were waiting for internal

    resources to deploy it.

    Staying off the bleeding edge. Many companies could have

    achieved a greater ROI if they had not deployed the .0 releases

    of Oracle applications.

    CONCLUSION

    SAP projects are larger in scale and scope and thus take a

    longer time to reach positive ROI than Oracle.

    More Oracle customers than SAP customers achieve a positive

    ROI. Ninety percent of Oracle customers can expect a positive

    ROI in fewer than 5 years.

    SAP customers often face customization and integration

    challenges that slow deployments and increase consulting and

    personnel costs.

    Oracle has a lower overall TCO than SAP.

    Corporate Headquarters

    Nucleus Research Incorporated

    36 Washington StreetWellesley, MA 02481

    United States

    +1 781 416 2900

    Europe, Middle East, and AfricaNucleus Research EMEA

    17A rue Pavee

    75004 Paris

    France+33 1 42 77 75 38