Oracle vs SAP Comparison
Transcript of Oracle vs SAP Comparison
-
7/29/2019 Oracle vs SAP Comparison
1/3
ROI ANALYSIS YOU CAN TRUSTTM
Comparing the Real ROIfrom Oracle and SAP
This document was developed by Nucleus Research at the request
of Oracle to help its salespeople and customers understand and
compare in context the results of two Nucleus Research Real ROI
reports: #D23 The Real ROI from SAP, and #E36 The Real ROI
from Oracle E-Business Suite.
THE NUCLEUS REPORTSNucleus analysts independently conducted reference checks of 22
Oracle E-Business Suite customers and 21 SAP customers. The
customers were identified from the customer case studies and success
stories on each companys Web site.
WHOS NUCLEUS?
Nucleus Research is an independent IT analyst firm established in 2000
to help companies evaluate the return on investment from technology
projects. Nucleus has published thousands of independent ROI case
studies and helped hundreds of companies evaluate their own business
cases for ERP and CRM deployments. Nucleus is the only IT analyst
firm registered with NASBA, the National Association of State Boards of
Accountancy, for its unbiased and credible IT ROI methodology.
WHO PAID FOR THESE REPORTS?
The original reports were developed completely independently by
Nucleus for its user subscription service. Oracle learned about the
reports after they were published and acquired reprint rights from
Nucleus.
ROI AND PAYBACK
65 percent of Oracle E-Business Suite customers achieved a positive
return on investment after an average deployment time of 3.1 years.
Nucleus estimated that more than 90 percent of Oracle applications
customers could expect a positive ROI within 5 years.
43 percent of SAP customers had achieved a positive return on
investment after an average deployment time of 2.8 years. Nucleus
was not able to estimate an expected payback period for SAP because
many companies had no clear expectations of when they would achieve
a positive ROI and the expected payback period could not be project
based on current realization of benefits.
2005 Nucleus Research, Inc.
Reproduction in whole or in part without
written permission is prohibited. Nucleus
Research is the leader in the return on
investment analysis of technology. Please
visit www.NucleusResearch.com.
-
7/29/2019 Oracle vs SAP Comparison
2/3
Nucleus Research, Inc. F36www.NucleusResearch.com Page 2
Whats ROI?
Return on investment is calculated by dividing the average annual net
benefits over a 3 year period by the initial costs:
(Y1+Y2+Y3)/3
initial cost
Benefits include both direct cost savings and productivity and other
indirect benefits; costs include software, hardware, personnel,
consulting, and training.
DEPLOYMENT SIZE
The range of deployment size for Oracle was from 20 users to 3400
users; for SAP, the range was from 2 to 5000.
Deployment Expectations
64 percent of Oracle deployments were completed on time versus 71
percent of SAP deployments.
55 percent of Oracle deployments were completed on budget versus 52
percent of SAP deployments.
BENEFITS
Respondents indicated that
48 percent of Oracle customers increased user productivity.
39 percent of Oracle customers improved financial management.
26 percent of Oracle customers reduced IT costs.
SAP customers received benefits from increased productivity, improved
operations management, and improved information organization and
access; however, the majority of companies found those returns were
not significant enough to deliver a positive ROI. The benefit totals broke
down as follows:
50 percent of SAP customers increased user productivity.
35 percent of SAP customers improved information organization
and access.
30 percent of SAP customers improved operations management.
COST COMPARISONS
Initial costs Oracle average Oracle median SAP average SAP med
Software 1,729,688 550,000 1,853,333 1,000
Consulting 2,301,429 787,500 3,637,039 850
Hardware 284,500 62,500 882,000 345
Personnel 675,000 750,000 2,480,000 806
Training 263,088 57,072 1,271,550 137
Total 5,253,705 2,207,072 10,123,922 3,139,
Ongoing costs Oracle average Oracle median SAP average SAP med
Softwaremaintenance
591,924 330,000 1,016,616 637
Personnel 1,590,000 900,000 3,360,000 1,4403-year TCO 7,435,629 3,437,072 14,500,538 5,216,
KEY POINTS
Costs
Oracles average costs were 48 percent lower than SAPs.
Oracles median costs were 29 percent lower than SAPs.
Oracles average 3-year TCO was 48% lower than SAPs.
-
7/29/2019 Oracle vs SAP Comparison
3/3
Nucleus Research, Inc. F36www.NucleusResearch.com Page 3
Oracles median 3-year TCO was 34 percent lower than SAPs.
PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS
It takes fewer internal personnel to deploy Oracle: an average of
81 man-months of internal personnel were needed for Oracle,
compared to an average of372 for SAP.
It takes less training to deploy Oracle: an average of27 hours
of training for Oracle, compared to an average of49 hours forSAP.
IS ORACLE MORE EXPENSIVE PER USER FOR SOFTWARE AND
CONSULTING?
No. Because the average Oracle deployment studied was smaller than
the average SAP deployment studied, customers didnt get as much of a
volume discount on software and the consulting costs are fixed, not
variable.
ROI CHALLENGES
SAP customers faced three key challenges:
Lack of breadth and repeatability. Companies werent able to
deploy to as many users as they had hoped, or impact enoughprocesses positively on a frequent basis, to achieve enough
benefits for a positive ROI.
High personnel costs.
Excessive customization. Extensive customization slowed
deployment and increased consulting costs.
Oracle customers faced the following key challenges:
Need for more thorough vetting of outside consultants. More
rigorous investigation of all members of the consulting team
would have lessened delays companies experienced in
completing the deployment of Oracle applications.
Buying ahead of business need. Some companies had
applications sitting on the shelf as they were waiting for internal
resources to deploy it.
Staying off the bleeding edge. Many companies could have
achieved a greater ROI if they had not deployed the .0 releases
of Oracle applications.
CONCLUSION
SAP projects are larger in scale and scope and thus take a
longer time to reach positive ROI than Oracle.
More Oracle customers than SAP customers achieve a positive
ROI. Ninety percent of Oracle customers can expect a positive
ROI in fewer than 5 years.
SAP customers often face customization and integration
challenges that slow deployments and increase consulting and
personnel costs.
Oracle has a lower overall TCO than SAP.
Corporate Headquarters
Nucleus Research Incorporated
36 Washington StreetWellesley, MA 02481
United States
+1 781 416 2900
Europe, Middle East, and AfricaNucleus Research EMEA
17A rue Pavee
75004 Paris
France+33 1 42 77 75 38