Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

28
a customer and science-focused contract development & manufacturing organization OPTIMIZATION OF GLYCOSYLATION AND CHARGE DISTRIBUTION THROUGH CULTURE PARAMETERS AND SUPPLEMENTS Sigma Mostafa, Venkata Tayi, Brian Baker, James Smedley, Nate Oien, Derek Ryan, Abhinav Shukla Cell Culture Engineering XV May 11, 2016

Transcript of Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

Page 1: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

a customer and science-focused

contract development & manufacturing organization

OPTIMIZATION OF GLYCOSYLATION AND

CHARGE DISTRIBUTION THROUGH CULTURE

PARAMETERS AND SUPPLEMENTS

Sigma Mostafa, Venkata Tayi, Brian Baker, James Smedley, Nate Oien,

Derek Ryan, Abhinav Shukla

Cell Culture Engineering XV

May 11, 2016

Page 2: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

• Introduction – KBI workflow

• Case study 1 – PAT approach to meet charge

species target

• Case study 2 – Product quality toolbox

• Case study 3 – Impact of Cu2+ on product quality

• Conclusions

Outline

2 |

Page 3: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

KBI Locations

3 |

KBI RTP

• Cell Culture Process Development

• Purification Process Development

• Microbial Process Development

• Analytical Development

KBI Boulder

• Microbial Process Development

• Microbial cGMP Manufacturing

• Analytical Development

KBI Durham

• Analytical and Formulation Dev.

• Cell Line Development

• Cell Culture cGMP Manufacturing

Page 4: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

CLD 2%

Dev / Mfg 27%

CLD / Dev / Mfg 32%

Process Characterization

14%

Tech. Transfer/MFG

12%

Dev 11%

PD Supply 2%

Project Types

12%

58% 2%

14%

2% 2%

7% 2%

Molecule Types

Bispecific Ab mAb*

Growth factor Vaccine glycoprotein

Enzyme Recombinant Enzyme

PEGylated protein Fc-Fusion Protein

4 |

Distribution of 2015 Completed Projects: 50+ in

Development

*Includes 5 Biosimilars

Page 5: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

Background

• Technology Transfer project

• CHOK1 cell line

• Medium & feeds are off-the shelf

• Limited historical data (n = 2 with varied

data)

• Acidic species desired level within 35 – 45%

5 |

Case Study 1: PAT approach to meet PQ target

Page 6: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

• Cell growth and viability were comparable

across bench scale cultures

Case Study 1: PAT approach to meet PQ target

6 |

Page 7: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

• Acidic species range was met only in portion of the

bench scale runs

• Other cell culture and PQ ranges were met by all the

runs

Case Study 1: PAT approach to meet PQ target

7 |

Page 8: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

• Impact of culture length on acidic species was

investigated

• Acidic species was observed to decrease with

culture time

8 |

Case Study 1: PAT approach to meet PQ target

Page 9: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

• At the 200L Demo Run stage daily WCX testing

was carried out to determine harvest day

9 |

Case Study 1: PAT approach to meet PQ target

Page 10: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

• This PAT approach was implemented in the cGMP runs

• The three cGMP runs were harvested on three different

days based on acidic species level

Case Study 1: PAT approach to meet PQ target

10 |

Page 11: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

• Acidic species levels were very similar for all 3

cGMP BDS

• Other product quality attributes were also within

acceptable range

Case Study 1: PAT approach to meet PQ target

11 |

Page 12: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

• A PAT approach using a WCX assay led to a

successful cGMP campaign

• Variable harvest day, within a narrow range,

maintained other cell culture and product

quality attributes in range

• Cross functional collaboration was critical

for successful implementation of this

approach

Case Study 1: Results Summary

12 |

Page 13: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

• KBI has an array of tools to customize

product quality

13 |

Case Study 2: Product Quality Toolbox

Galactose

Fucose

Mannose

Sialic Acid

Ratio of

main/

acidic/

basic

species

HMW & LMW

Page 14: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

• Impact of key supplements on glycosylation

Case Study 2: Product Quality Toolbox

14

0

20

40

60

80

100

G0 FG0 G1 FG1 G2 FG2

2.0

80.4

11.9

0.6

%

No supplements

0

20

40

60

80

100

G0 FG0 G1 FG1 G2 FG2

7.1

44.9

2.6

35.2

5.5

%

Mn2+ + Uridine + Galactose

0

20

40

60

80

100

G0 FG0 G1 FG1 G2 FG2

29.2

55.3

2.3 8.2

0.5

%

Fucosylation inhibitor (2F-PAF)

0

20

40

60

80

100

G0 FG0 G1 FG1 G2 FG2

36.3

20.6 16.3 17.1

2.1 3.1

%

2F-PAF + Mn2+ + Uridine + Galactose

Page 15: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

9/21/2016 15

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

37C 37C --> 32C

25.2 11.4

67.2

54.6

7.6

24.6

% Acidic % Main % Basic

Effect of temperature shift on charge variants distribution

• Temperature shift decreased the

acidic variants possibly due to

reduction of deamidation

• Temperature shift increased basic

variants possibly due to c-terminal

lysine residues

• Temperature shift to an optimized

value could produce the molecule

with desired profile

Case Study 2: Product Quality Toolbox

Page 16: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

16 |

Case Study 2: Product Quality Toolbox

• Temperature shift decreased galactosylation

across clones

Page 17: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

• A product quality toolbox was established as

a technology development project

• This toolbox has been successfully used in

multiple biosimilar and novel molecule

process development

17 |

Case Study 2: Results Summary

Page 18: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

Background

• CHO DG44 derived vendor cell line

• Doubling time <20 hours

• Commercial off the shelf medium & feed

• KBI received a Phase I process that had

historically shown high variability

• Scope of project at KBI – Resupply and

further development

18 |

Case Study 3: Impact of Cu+2 on Product Quality

Page 19: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

• Replicate cultures in 3L bioreactors showed lack

of reproducibility

• Reactor 2 had a ‘favorable’ pH correction on day 7

(upward); Reactor 1 had ‘unfavorable’ pH

corrections on days 7 and 10 (toward lower end of

pH dead-band).

Case Study 3

19 |

Page 20: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

• Feed addition led to immediate lactate production

and associated pH drop (feed pH is neutral)

• Amount of pH drop after a feed varied from run to

run and could be as high as 0.25 pH unit

20 |

Case Study 3

6.60

6.70

6.80

6.90

7.00

7.10

7.20

7.30

7.40

Day 8 Feed Day 10 Feed

Day 12 Feed Day 14

Feed

Page 21: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

• Re-supply Strategy

- Expand pH dead-band

- Glucose range

- Initial glutamine

- Feed addition rate

21 |

Case Study 3

Page 22: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

• Shake flask was found to be a good model

to study the high lactate & rapid viability

decline

• Addition of Cu2+ was tested in shake flask

and found to be highly successful in

extending viability and increasing

productivity

22 |

Case Study 3: Impact of Cu+2 on Product Quality

Page 23: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

Case Study 3: Impact of Feeds and Supplements in SF

23

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

VC

D (

10

6 c

ells/m

L)

Time (Days)

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14V

iab

ilit

y (%

)

Time (Days)

Control with current Feed Current Feed + Cu supplementation

New Feed New Feed + Cu supplementation

New Feed + Amino Acid Cocktail + Cu supplementation

Page 24: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

Case Study 3: Impact of Feeds and Supplements in SF

24

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

A B C D ETit

er

(g/L)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

La

cta

te (

g/L)

Time (Days)

Control with current Feed Current Feed + Cu supplementation

New Feed New Feed + Cu supplementation

New Feed + Amino Acid Cocktail + Cu supplementation

Page 25: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

Case Study 3: Impact of Feeds and Supplements in BRX

25

Control with current Feed New Feed + Amino Acid Cocktail + Cu supplementation

Page 26: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

• Supplementation of culture with 400 nM

Cu2+ improved viability, titer, and process

reproducibility dramatically

Case Study 3: Results Summary

26 |

Page 27: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

• High throughput, high sensitivity analytics

are essential for successful and efficient

process development

• Surrogate outputs, in place of complex

analytics such as mass spec, would enable

implementation of PAT approaches

Final Thoughts

27 |

Page 28: Optimization of Glycosyation & Charge Distribution Through Culture Parameters & Supplements

Upstream Process Development

Brian Baker

Venkata Tayi

Niket Bubna

Cameron Phillips

Jingshu Zhu

Acknowledgements

28 |

Analytical Development

James Smedley

Nate Oien

Derek Ryan

Management

Abhinav Shukla

Tim Kelly

Prathima Acharya

Joe McMahon