OPTIMIN: Innovative Bottom Ash Treatment for Resourcing ...€¦ · 2nd International VDI...
Transcript of OPTIMIN: Innovative Bottom Ash Treatment for Resourcing ...€¦ · 2nd International VDI...
OPTIMIN: Innovative Bottom Ash Treatment for Resourcing different
Mineral Components as ConstructionMaterial
Stefan Lübben(Climate Protection Management)
2nd International VDI Conference, 11./12.10.2016
2nd International VDI Conference
Metals and Minerals Recovery from IBA 11. - 12. October 2016
2
1. Initial situation around IBA in Hamburg2. Reasons for changing3. Project „OPTIMIN“4. Further ideas
Structure
1) Development of the incinerationcapacities in Hamburg
Incineration plantContract with SRH until 2016
Incineration plantContract with SRH until 2019,45% ownership
SRH-owned incineration plantCapacity: 180,000 tons/a
Hamburg
SRH-owned incineration plantCapacity: 320,000 tons/a
Plant in Stellingen was closed on 21.06.2015 – after 42 years
2014: Capacity for incineration ~ 1 Mio. t/a2017: Capacity for incineration ~ 0,6 Mio. t/a
At the end of 2016 we will stopour supply to WtE Stapelfeld
1) Quantity of IBA from household-waste in Hamburg in 2015
2nd International VDI Conference
Metals and Minerals Recovery from IBA 11. - 12. October 2016
4
Lower Saxony, Hamburg, Schleswig-Holstein supply the waste
4 incineration plants
Raw ash (IBA)
Treatment plants withcalcination / maturingRecycling of Fe- andNF-metals
Storage of refining slag
Trading and sale as a secondary constructionmaterial / disposal on a landfill
1) IBA as a secondary raw material
IBA as base layerbeneath pavement
CTA Hamburg 2015
Decreasingapplication ofIBA as baselayer withoutbinding agent:2001 = 98%, 2004 = 95%,2008 = 74%
Correspondingincrease in application asbase layer withbinding agent
2nd International VDI Conference
Metals and Minerals Recovery from IBA 11. - 12. October 2016
6
1. IBA should be used as a secondary raw material forconstruction
2. SRH as a public enterprise has to be a front-runnerfor sustainability and is in the public eye
3. Dumping the IBA is more expensive than its usageas a construction material
4. Current drafts of the „Mantelverordnung“ offer morestringent conditions for some parameters, e.g.- chlorides- sulfates- Antimon- …
5. If we do not act very soon, we have to dispose theIBA in the near future
2) Reasons for changing…
Results from a finished project (r³ - ATR):
During treatment, the TARTECH plant generates mass flowswith 0-2 / 2-5 / 5-18 / 18-45 mm particle size for an optimizedmetal recovery
These mass flows are mostly free of metals and free of finestparticles with their high content of chlorides and sulfates. Theyare completely different to the common IBA
Dividing into several cornsize-ranges might be the opening in their usage as components in the concrete and tarmac industry
Frac
tion
2 -5
mm
Frac
tion
5 -1
8mm
2) Reasons for changing…
2nd International VDI Conference
Metals and Minerals Recovery from IBA 11. - 12. October 2016
8
2) Reasons for changing…
Chloride and Sulfate Content of IBA according to the sieve fraction
High content of salts is the major problem of IBA as construction material
[Eluat nach DIN EN 12457-4 (S4-Verfahren, Feststoff-Flüssigkeit 1:10, 24h Überkopfschüttler) ,Koch, S. 2016: Untersuchung der Depo-nierbarkeit ausgewählter Siebschnitte von aufbereiteter Schlacke der Hamburger Müllverbrennung, Masterarbeit TU Braunschweig]
LAGA M20Z 1.2
Close cooperation between the producer of the IBA, the treatment plants, the trader, the potential consumers (suppliers of building materials) and thescientific world
The interests of all members of the value chain areinvolved in the project
Only uncalcinated IBA is used because it is much easier to devide it into its components
Run-time of the BMBF-Project: 1/2016 – 6/2018Subsidies 570.000 €, total costs 1.000.000 €
The amount of metals needs to be reduced to the absolute minimum, because they interfere the application of IBA asa building material
The amount of glass should be reduced
3) OPTIMIN: Optimization of thematerial recycling of mineralresidues from waste treatment
9
3) OPTIMIN: Optimization of thematerial recycling of mineralresidues from waste treatment
Targets of this project: Washing out the particles < 200 µm to remove the
chlorides, sulfates and the easy leachable metals Dividing the washed mineral components into cornsize-
ranges which fit to the requirements of concrete andasphalt industry
Making and proving adapted mixtures to identify themaximum possible content of IBA components
Production of reference blocks from concrete and test-plots of tarmac pavement
Production of a filter cake in a screen filter press fromparticles < 200 µm
Tests whether these finest particles can be included in the production of cement clinker
Grain size0,71-1mm0-0,71mm
10
Verticalplunger jig
3) OPTIMIN: Optimization of thematerial recycling of mineralresidues from waste treatment
Feed-hopper
Discharge-valve
Counter flow water
Overflow: lightweightfraction, water
PurifiedmineralmatterMetal concentrate
Bräumer, M.(2009): Vertikalsetzmaschine zur Aufbereitung von Stoffgemischen zu Ersatzbrennstoffen.- In: Thomé-Kozmiensky K.J.
und M. Beckmann: Erneuerbare Energien, Band 2, TK-Verlag
3) Plunger Jig
12
13
3) Output of the Jig
14
3) Output of the JigCoarse Fraction
unburnt
glass
brickfragments
pottery
Al
Fe
nonferrousmetals
15
First Screening (Mass-%)
Unknown: Why do we find those fibers?
3) Output of the JigCoarse and Fine Fraction
mm 0-0,16
0,16-0,8
0,8-1,6
1,6-3,15
3,15-5
5-8 >8
Coarse 0,5 1,3 8,8 10,2 7,5 18,6 53,1
Fine 28,4 63,3 7,2 0,8 0,1 0,2 0,1
3) Saltiness of the Jig Output
2nd International VDI Conference
Metals and Minerals Recovery from IBA 11. - 12. October 2016
16
These are the first results, only two sample drawings The jig is in the test phase, nothing is representative!
1.233
451
50 mg/l = Target Value (LAGA M 20 for Z 1.2)
3) Employment for the mineralfractions
2nd International VDI Conference
Metals and Minerals Recovery from IBA 11. - 12. October 2016
17
Raw IBA
Washing / Jig
Recovery of non-ferrous metals
Mineral fraction< 0,2 mm
Mineral fraction2 - 5 mm5 – 11mm
11 – 16mm
Mineral fraction2 - 8 mm
8 – 16 mm16 – 32 mm
Mineral fraction0,2 - 2 mm
4) Further Ideas
Pictures left side:above: IBA < 63 µm from TARTECH-BETA-Linebelow: normal Cement
Picture above: Shearing test with referenceblock made from 90% liquid sludge and10% IBA < 710 µm from the BETA-line
Fotos: Claus Gronholz
www.optimin.de
Thank you for listening !Dr. Stefan Lübben
[email protected] Hamburg
Recycling -for a sustainable world