Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S.,...
-
Upload
mariela-newey -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S.,...
![Page 1: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients
Antonio Craxì
Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S.,
University of Palermo, Italy
![Page 2: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Treatment for patients infected with Treatment for patients infected with HCV genotype 2 or 3HCV genotype 2 or 3: the current SOC: the current SOC
End-of-treatment virological responseEnd-of-treatment virological responseSustained virological responseSustained virological response
End-of-treatment virological responseEnd-of-treatment virological responseSustained virological responseSustained virological response
HCV RNA detection at end ofHCV RNA detection at end oftreatment and 24 weeks latertreatment and 24 weeks laterHCV RNA detection at end ofHCV RNA detection at end oftreatment and 24 weeks latertreatment and 24 weeks later
Pegylated interferon + ribavirinPegylated interferon + ribavirin0.8 g per day x 24 weeks0.8 g per day x 24 weeks
Pegylated interferon + ribavirinPegylated interferon + ribavirin0.8 g per day x 24 weeks0.8 g per day x 24 weeks
No liver biopsy or serologicalmarkers of disease severity
No liver biopsy or serologicalmarkers of disease severity
![Page 3: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Optimising treatment based on genotype: Optimising treatment based on genotype: 48 weeks for G1, 24 weeks for G2/348 weeks for G1, 24 weeks for G2/3
84%79%
0
20
40
60
SV
R (
%)
Genotype 1
8081% 80%
100
Genotype 2/3
24-LD
24-SD
48-LD
48-SD
96 144 99 153
LD = RBV 800 mg/day SD = RBV 1000/1200 mg/day
Hadziyannis S, et al. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 346
PEG IFN alfa2a 180 g plus Ribavirin
29%
41%42%
52%
n= 101 118 250 271
![Page 4: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14–5
–4
–3
–2
–1
0
Mea
n d
eclin
e in
HC
V R
NA
(lo
g10
co
pie
s/m
L)
Days
Genotype 2 Genotype 1
Neumann A et al. J Infect Dis 2000; 182: 28
HCV RNA kinetics during antiviral treatment: importance of HCV genotype
![Page 5: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Pooled analysis of genotype 2 and 3 Pooled analysis of genotype 2 and 3 patients treated with antivirals for 24 weekspatients treated with antivirals for 24 weeks
Andriulli, APT 2008, 28:397
AuthorAuthor YearYear Genotype 3Genotype 3 Genotype 2Genotype 2
Working groupWorking group 20052005 110/171110/171 94/14794/147
BrownBrown 20062006 151/251151/251 213/298213/298
MangiaMangia 20052005 13/1713/17 40/5340/53
Meyer-WyssMeyer-Wyss 20062006 47/6747/67 21/2421/24
RizzettoRizzetto 20052005 118/148118/148 80/9280/92
ShiffmanShiffman 20072007 244/369244/369 268/356268/356
ZeuzemZeuzem 20042004 143/182143/182 39/4239/42
ZeuzemZeuzem 20042004 15/2015/20 27/3827/38
PooledPooled(fixed effect)(fixed effect)
841/1225841/1225 782/1050782/1050
1/64 1/16 1/4 1 4 16 64
Better Genotype 3 Better Genotype 2
1.489 (1.233/1.798)
HCV G2: SVR 74% (782/1050) irrespective of viral load
HCV G3: •LVL: SVR 75% (405/737)•HVL: SVR 58% (298/500)
![Page 6: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Response rates in genotype 2/3 patients(pooled analysis of Fried, Hadzyiannis, Shiffman)
G2(n=395)
G3(426)
RVR (<50 IU/mL) 71% 60%
cEVR (<50 IU/mL) 24% 29%
pEVR (≥ 2log drop) 1% 3%
SVR 77% 68%
SVR in pts with RVR 86% 86%
SVR in pts with cEVR * 61% 54%
SVR in pts with pEVR ** - -
* Not including RVR; ** not including RVR or cEVR
Fried MW, et al. J Hepatol 2008; 48 (Suppl 2); Abstract 7
![Page 7: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
March 2006March 2006:: Female, 38 yrs, HCV known since 1999 (surgery 1977)Female, 38 yrs, HCV known since 1999 (surgery 1977) No alcohol, BW 61 kg, BMI 22No alcohol, BW 61 kg, BMI 22 ALT ALT 3 3 8 unl 8 unl HCV G2, HCV RNA 6.5 x 10HCV G2, HCV RNA 6.5 x 1066 IU/ml IU/ml FibroscanFibroscan 4.3 KPa, no liver biopsy 4.3 KPa, no liver biopsy
April to October 2006April to October 2006:: PEG IFN PEG IFN -2a 180 -2a 180 g/wk + RBV 800 mg, ITT 2g/wk + RBV 800 mg, ITT 24 weeks4 weeks Excellent tolerance and adherenceExcellent tolerance and adherence RVR at 4 weeks, EVR at 12, ETR at 24RVR at 4 weeks, EVR at 12, ETR at 24
March 2007March 2007:: SVR confirmed SVR confirmed
The Good
Overtreatment? YES NO
![Page 8: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
May 2007May 2007:: Male, 46 yrs, HCV known since 2004 (no risk factors)Male, 46 yrs, HCV known since 2004 (no risk factors) Alcohol 50 gm/day up to 2004, BW 86 kg, BMI 29Alcohol 50 gm/day up to 2004, BW 86 kg, BMI 29 ALT 2ALT 2 4 4 unlunl HCV G2, HCV RNA 4.3 x 10HCV G2, HCV RNA 4.3 x 1066 IU/ml IU/ml FibroscanFibroscan 8.1 KPa, biopsy: stage 3 grade 2 Metavir 8.1 KPa, biopsy: stage 3 grade 2 Metavir
July 2007July 2007:: Starts PEG IFN Starts PEG IFN -2b 1.5 -2b 1.5 g/Kg/wk + RBV 1200 mg, ITT 2g/Kg/wk + RBV 1200 mg, ITT 24 weeks4 weeks Modest tolerability, adherence >80/80/80Modest tolerability, adherence >80/80/80 No RVR at 4 weeks, EVR at 12No RVR at 4 weeks, EVR at 12
October 2007October 2007:: Patient decides to stop at 15 weeks, while HCV RNA negative (work problems, Patient decides to stop at 15 weeks, while HCV RNA negative (work problems,
tolerability, has heard about short treatments)tolerability, has heard about short treatments) December 2007December 2007::
HCV RNA positive, ALT flareHCV RNA positive, ALT flare
The Bad
Undertreatment (too short)? YES NO
![Page 9: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
October 2003October 2003:: Male, 39 yrs, HCV known since early ’90s (IVDU in the ’80s)Male, 39 yrs, HCV known since early ’90s (IVDU in the ’80s) Alcohol 80 gm/day up to 2003, “stopped?”; BW 102 kg, BMI 34Alcohol 80 gm/day up to 2003, “stopped?”; BW 102 kg, BMI 34 ALT 2ALT 2 5 5 unl, PLT 104.000/mmunl, PLT 104.000/mm33
HCV G3, HCV RNA 1.8 x 10HCV G3, HCV RNA 1.8 x 1066 IU/ml; HBV and HOV negative IU/ml; HBV and HOV negative FibroscanFibroscan 16.5 KPa, biopsy: stage 4 grade 2 Metavir 16.5 KPa, biopsy: stage 4 grade 2 Metavir F1 esophageal varicesF1 esophageal varices
December 2003 December 2003 May 2004 May 2004:: Starts PEG IFN Starts PEG IFN -2a 180 -2a 180 g + RBV 800 mg, ITT 2g + RBV 800 mg, ITT 24 weeks4 weeks Good tolerability, PEG IFN 135 Good tolerability, PEG IFN 135 g since week 8 due to cytopeniag since week 8 due to cytopenia No RVR at 4 weeks, EVR at 12, ETR at 24 weeksNo RVR at 4 weeks, EVR at 12, ETR at 24 weeks
October 2004October 2004:: HCV RNA positive, ALT flareHCV RNA positive, ALT flare
The Ugly
Undertreatment (not enough)? YES NO
![Page 10: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Optimization of treatment for HCV Optimization of treatment for HCV genotype 2 or 3genotype 2 or 3: 2009: 2009
Extended treatment (48 weeks)?Extended treatment (48 weeks)?Extended treatment (48 weeks)?Extended treatment (48 weeks)?
Standard treatment (24 weeks)?Standard treatment (24 weeks)?Standard treatment (24 weeks)?Standard treatment (24 weeks)?
Short treatment (12-16 weeks)?Short treatment (12-16 weeks)?Short treatment (12-16 weeks)?Short treatment (12-16 weeks)?
HCV genotype 2 or 3patients - Who needs:HCV genotype 2 or 3
patients - Who needs:
![Page 11: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Shortening Therapy: Study DesignsShortening Therapy: Study Designs
Week 0
Shiffman Gt 2/3PEG-IFNα-2a 180 µg qwk, RBV 800 mg
Mangia Gt 2/3PEG-IFNα-2b 1.0 µg/kg qwk, RBV 1000/1200 mg2
16 weeks
24 weeks
1. Shiffman ML, et al. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:124-134. 2. Mangia A, et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2609-2017.
24 weeks
Week 4
12 weeks
24 weeks
24-wk Follow-up
24-wk Follow-up
24-wk Follow-up
24-wk Follow-up
24-wk Follow-up+
–
n = 732
n = 731
n = 133
n = 80
n = 70
![Page 12: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Shorter Treatment Duration?Shorter Treatment Duration?
Shiffman ML, et al. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:124-134; Mangia A, et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2609-2017.
Standard duration regimen (24 wk)
Variable duration (12 or 24 wk)
0
20
40
60
80
100
AnyHCV Gt
HCVGt 2
HCVGt 3
76 7676
7782
62SV
R,
%
Shiffman et al: Lower SVR ratesat 16 vs 24 wk (Gt 2/3)*
Mangia et al: SVR rates comparableat 12 vs 24 wk (Gt 2/3)*
0
20
40
60
80
100
AnyHCV Gt
HCVGt 2
HCVGt 3
SV
R,
%
HCVGt 3
6270
62
75
6266
P <.001P <.001
P = .23
Standard duration (24 wk)
Shorter duration (16 wk)
* LOD <50 IU/mL
(70)(213) (53)(160) (17)(53)(732) (731) (356)(372) (369)(358)
![Page 13: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Relapse rates in Genotype 2 and 3Relapse rates in Genotype 2 and 3
12 – 16 wks 24 wks
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Shiffman 2007
%
All patients
%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Mangia 2005 Dalgard 2008
RVR patients
![Page 14: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Shiffman ML, et al. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:124-134.
Patients infected with HCV genotype 2/3
(N = 1291)
RVR: 67%(871 / 1291)
SVR
378/461 370/410
55/205 105/215
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
SVR
ACCELERATE Trial: SVR in Patients With and Without an RVR
82%
27% 49%
90%
16 wks24 wks
16 wks24 wks
No RVR: 33%(420 / 1291)
![Page 15: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
SVR rate with 16 vs.24 weeks of treatment in G2/3 patients with an RVR and LVL
16 weeks PEG IFN alfa 2a plus RBV 800 mg/day
n=123 n=101 n=295 n=260 n=49n=43
≤400 000 IU/mL 400–800 000 IU/mL >800 000 IU/mL
90%84%
78%
95%92% 88%
SV
R (
%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Standard analysis
24 weeks PEG IFN alfa 2a plus RBV 800 mg/day
Shiffman ML, et al. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:124-134.
![Page 16: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Dalgard, Hepatology 2008, 47:35
PEG IFN alfa-2b and RBV for 14 vs 24 weeks in patients PEG IFN alfa-2b and RBV for 14 vs 24 weeks in patients with HCV G2 or 3 and rapid virological responsewith HCV G2 or 3 and rapid virological response
PEG IFN alfa 2b 1.5 ug/kg, RBV 800-1400 mg
14 wks14 wks 24 wks24 wksn.n. SVRSVR RelapseRelapse n.n. SVRSVR RelapseRelapse
OverallOverall 139139 120 (86)120 (86) 146146 136136 (93.2)(93.2)
Geno 3Geno 3 110110 93 (84)93 (84) 17 (16)17 (16) 115115 106 (92)106 (92) 9 (8)9 (8)
22 2929 27 (93)27 (93) 2 ( 7)2 ( 7) 3131 30 (97)30 (97) 1 (3)1 (3)
Viral loadViral load
Geno 3Geno 3
≥ ≥ 400,000 IU400,000 IU 6666 57 (86)57 (86) 9 (14)9 (14) 6666 57 ( 86)57 ( 86) 9 (14)9 (14)
< 400,000 IU< 400,000 IU 3636 29 (80)29 (80) 7 (20)7 (20) 4444 44 (100)44 (100) 0 (0)0 (0)
Geno 2Geno 2
≥ ≥ 400,000 IU400,000 IU 2222 20 (90)20 (90) 2 (10)2 (10) 1919 18 (95)18 (95) 1 (5)1 (5)
< 400,000 IU< 400,000 IU 66 6(100)6(100) 0 (0)0 (0) 1111 11 (100)11 (100) 0 (0)0 (0)
![Page 17: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
56%
38%
Genotype 2 (n=55)
(%
)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
12 weeks of treatment
Genotype 3 (n=137)
Genotype 3 (n=139)
Genotype 2 (n=49)
24 weeks of treatment
5%
58%
31%
9%
82%
12%6%
78%
12% 10%
Lagging, Hepatology 2008, 47:1837
SVR Relapse NR
Randomized comparison of 12 or 24 weeks of Randomized comparison of 12 or 24 weeks of PEG IFN alfa-2a and RBV in chronic HCV G2/3 infectionPEG IFN alfa-2a and RBV in chronic HCV G2/3 infection
RBV 800 mg
![Page 18: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Meta-analysis of short vs standard therapy Meta-analysis of short vs standard therapy in genotypes 2 and 3 patients with RVRin genotypes 2 and 3 patients with RVR
AuthorAuthor YearYear ShortShort StandardStandard
DalgardDalgard 20082008 120/139120/139 136/146136/146
ShiffmanShiffman 20072007 385/487385/487 397/466397/466
MangiaMangia 20052005 113/153113/153 41/4541/45
BonardiBonardi 20062006 29/3229/32 27/3127/31
YuYu 20072007 43/4343/43 85/8785/87
PooledPooled(fixed effect)(fixed effect)
690/854690/854 686/775686/775
1/64 1/16 1/4 1 4 16 64
Better Short Better Standard
1.629 (1.234/2.152)
Andriulli, APT 2008, 28:397
![Page 19: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
SVR-Rate (%) Relapse Rate (%)
100
80
60
40
20
0
6565 67677676
n=22/34
n=20/30
n=28/37
6767
PegIFN alfa 2aRiba 1000-120024 weeks
Peg IFN alfa 2aRiba 80048 weeks
PegIFN alfa2aRiba 1000-120048 weeks
2626
n=14/21
n=15/27
PegIFN alfa 2aRiba 80024 weeks
2424n=
7/2091313
3/23n=
1/27
Should Treatment be Intensified in Genotypes 2/3 without RVR ?
Retrospective analysis
1Fried M et al, N Engl J Med al. 2002 2 Hadziyannis el at. Ann Intern Med 2004
4
Willems B et al. EASL 2007
![Page 20: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Optimization of treatment for HCV Optimization of treatment for HCV genotype 2 or 3genotype 2 or 3: 2009: 2009
Extended treatment (48 weeks)?Extended treatment (48 weeks)?Extended treatment (48 weeks)?Extended treatment (48 weeks)?
Standard treatement (24 weeks)?Standard treatement (24 weeks)?Standard treatement (24 weeks)?Standard treatement (24 weeks)?
Short treatment (12-16 weeks)?Short treatment (12-16 weeks)?Short treatment (12-16 weeks)?Short treatment (12-16 weeks)?
HCV genotype 2 or 3patients - Who needs:HCV genotype 2 or 3
patients - Who needs:
Cofactors?Cofactors?
![Page 21: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
67%60%
48%
76%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
G2/3 for 24 wks G2/3 for 16 wks
SV
R [
%]
F0-F2 fibrosis F3-F4 fibrosis
Bruno et al, EASL 2008, poster
SVR rates in genotype 2/3 patients(pooled analysis of ACCELERATE, Fried, Hadzyiannis)
![Page 22: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Lagging, Hepatology 2008, 47:1837
Randomized comparison of 12 or 24 weeks of Randomized comparison of 12 or 24 weeks of PEG IFN alfa-2a and RBV in chronic HCV G2/3 infectionPEG IFN alfa-2a and RBV in chronic HCV G2/3 infection
80%
14%
< 40 years of age (n=76)
(%
)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
12 weeks of treatment
≥ 40 years of age (n=118)
≥ 40 years of age (n=112)
< 40 years of age (n=76)
24 weeks of treatment
5%
45% 45%
10%
83%
8% 9%
75%
15%9%
SVR Relapse NR
RBV 800 mg
![Page 23: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
RVR and SVR in patients receiving Peg-IFN 2a 135 g + RBV 11 mg/Kg for 24 Weeks
Weiland O et al J Viral Hep 2008;15:641-645
![Page 24: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Ribavirin dosage and Ribavirin dosage and SVR in G2/3 patientsSVR in G2/3 patients
Hadziyannis:Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:346-355.
Willems et al: J Hepatol, 2006 Volume 46, S1, p S6
8481 79 80
67 65 67
76
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
24 weeks 800mg
24 weeks 1000/1200 mg
48weeks 800 mg
48weeks1000/1200 mg
% S
VR
All Non RVR
![Page 25: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
SVR in G2/3 patients according to schedule SVR in G2/3 patients according to schedule and to RBV concentration at 4 weeksand to RBV concentration at 4 weeks
57
74 75
91
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
< 2mg/l n =145
≥ 2mg/ln = 34
< 2mg/ln = 131
≥ 2mg/ln =45
% S
VR
p = 0.02
p = 0.12
12 weeks 24 weeksChristensen et al, EASL 2008
![Page 26: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
WIN-R: impact of weight-based RBV WIN-R: impact of weight-based RBV dosing on SVR in G2/3 patientsdosing on SVR in G2/3 patients
SVR %SVR % 65-85 kg65-85 kg 86-105 kg86-105 kg > 105 kg> 105 kg PP value value
Weight-based RBV dosing,Weight-based RBV dosing,RBV 800-1400 mg (n = 325)RBV 800-1400 mg (n = 325)
Genotype 2/3Genotype 2/3 64.164.1 59.259.2 61.261.2 .356.356
Flat dosing, Flat dosing, RBV 800 mg (n = 333)RBV 800 mg (n = 333)
Genotype 2/3Genotype 2/3 63.663.6 55.455.4 55.255.2 .034.034
Jacobson IM, et al. Hepatology. 2007;46:971-981.
![Page 27: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
A RCT of RBV 400 mg vs 800 mg/day in combination with PEG IFN -2a
ITT analysis at 24 week
Ribavirin 800 mg Ribavirin 400 mg
HCV G 2 No. of patients =18
SVR = 77.8%
No. of patients = 19
SVR = 63.2%
HCV G 3 No. of patients = 123
SVR = 67.5%
No. of patients = 122
SVR = 63.9%
Ferenci P et al Hepatology 2008;47:1816-1823
![Page 28: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Response-guided treatment for Response-guided treatment for HCV GT 2/3 RVR: a meta-analysisHCV GT 2/3 RVR: a meta-analysis
Di Martino V, et al. AASLD 2008. Abstract 213.
Pooled RCTs of GT 2/3 RVRPooled RCTs of GT 2/3 RVR
(7 studies, n=2054)(7 studies, n=2054)SVR increase with 24 WeeksSVR increase with 24 Weeks
vs shorter treatment, % (95% CI)vs shorter treatment, % (95% CI)
16 weeks treatment* (n=1782)16 weeks treatment* (n=1782) 2 (-5 to 8)2 (-5 to 8)
12 or 14 weeks treatment (n=272)12 or 14 weeks treatment (n=272) 11 (5 to 18)11 (5 to 18)
Fixed-dose RBVFixed-dose RBV†† 13 (0 to 25)13 (0 to 25)
Weight-based RBVWeight-based RBV 3 (-2 to 9)3 (-2 to 9)
*Irrespective of RBV regimen.†Irrespective of duration of shorter treatment.
![Page 29: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Mangia, Hepatology 2009, in press
Determinants of relapse after 12 weeks of therapy Determinants of relapse after 12 weeks of therapy in 496 patients with HCV G2 or G3 with RVRin 496 patients with HCV G2 or G3 with RVR
PEG IFN alfa 2b 1.5 ug/kg, RBV 800-1200 mg
Predictors of relapsePredictors of relapse pp OR; 95% CIOR; 95% CI
Age >45 yearsAge >45 years 0.0040.004 --
BMI >30 kg / mBMI >30 kg / m22 0.00010.0001 2.5; 1.49 – 4.20*2.5; 1.49 – 4.20*
Platelets <140.000/mmPlatelets <140.000/mm33 0.00010.0001 1.7; 1.03 – 2.70*1.7; 1.03 – 2.70*
*independently associated with SVR
EOT: 96%: SVR: 82%, Relapse: 14%
![Page 30: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
EOTEOT 33 (76.7%)33 (76.7%)
SVRSVR 30 (70%)30 (70%)
Re-treatment of 43 relapsers after short therapy Re-treatment of 43 relapsers after short therapy with standard (24 wks) treatment durationwith standard (24 wks) treatment duration
Mangia et al, J Hepatol 2008; 48 (Suppl 2): S6
![Page 31: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Albinterferon -Albinterferon -IFN Naïve, Gt 2/3 (Achieve 2/3): SVR Rates IFN Naïve, Gt 2/3 (Achieve 2/3): SVR Rates
alb-IFN 1200 µg q2wk
N=311
100
80
60
40
20
0All Pts (933)
79.8 80
alb-IFN 900 µg q2wkN=310
SV
R R
ate,
%
ITT analysis; q2wk, every 2 weeks; ribavirin 800 mg flat dose; G2/3 n=420/513
HGS press release, December 8, 2008
PEG IFN 2a 180 µg wkN=312
84.8P= ns
![Page 32: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
R7128 in HCV G 2/3 nonrespondersR7128 in HCV G 2/3 nonresponders
Gane E, et al. AASLD 2008. Abstract LB10.
No virologic breakthrough reportedNo virologic breakthrough reported Adverse events similar to previous reportsAdverse events similar to previous reports
GT 2 R7128 + PegIFN/RBVGT 3 R7128 + PegIFN/RBVGT 2 placebo + PegIFN/RBVGT 3 placebo + PegIFN/RBV
Weeks
HC
V R
NA
(lo
g10
IU/m
L)
R7128 treatment period
0 1 8765432
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Individual Patient HCV RNA Values Over Time
R7128: nucleoside analogue HCV polymerase inhibitor R7128: nucleoside analogue HCV polymerase inhibitor
HCV GT 2/3 patients with previous
treatment failure
(N = 25)
![Page 33: Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649c7c5503460f9492fdce/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
The G2/G3 RGT algorithm: 2009 on…The G2/G3 RGT algorithm: 2009 on…
G2/3HVL
24 weeks
LVL16 weeks
24 weeks48
weeks?STOP
Week 4
Week 12
Week 24
-
-
-
+
+ ≥2log
-
+
+ <2log
-
+
+
+
STAT-C ?
• Short therapy not to be chosen if F3/F4 fibrosis is present
• Age >40 associated to reduced SVR