Optics

57
Optics Professor Damian Czepita Department of Ophthalmology Pomeranian Medical Academy Szczecin, Poland http:// sci.pam.szczecin.pl/

description

Optics. Professor Damian Czepita Department of Ophthalmology Pomeranian Medical Academy Szczecin, Poland http://sci.pam.szczecin.pl/~czepita. EMMETROPIC EYE. Image: true, reversed, reduced Refraction: cornea 43,5 D lens 19,1 D aqueous humor boundary membrane of the vitreous - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Optics

Page 1: Optics

Optics

Professor Damian Czepita Department of Ophthalmology

Pomeranian Medical Academy Szczecin, Poland

http://sci.pam.szczecin.pl/~czepita

Page 2: Optics
Page 3: Optics
Page 4: Optics

EMMETROPIC EYE

• Image: true, reversed, reduced• Refraction:

cornea 43,5 D

lens 19,1 D

aqueous humor

boundary membrane of the vitreous

vitreous body

Total 58,5-64,2 D

Page 5: Optics

NEAR AND FAR POINT

• Near point:

The closest situated point from where exiting rays of light are refracted on the retina.

• Far point:

The farthest situated point from where exiting rays of light are refracted on the retina.

Page 6: Optics

RANGE AND AMPLITUDE OF ACCOMMODATION

• Range of accommodation:

The distance between the far and near point.

• Amplitude of accommodation:

The range of accommodation in D.

Page 7: Optics

AGE, NEAR POINT,AMPLITUDE OF ACCOMODATION

• 10 years 7 cm 14 D

• 20 years 10 cm 10 D

• 30 years 14 cm 7 D

• 40 years 22 cm 4,5 D

• 50 years 50 cm 2 D

• 60 years 100 cm 1 D

• 70 years infinite 0 D

Page 8: Optics

PRESBYOPIA

• After the 40th year of age:

Decrease in elasticity of fibers and capsules of the lens.

Page 9: Optics

SENILE HYPEROPIA

• After the 60th year of age:

Decrease of the refractive index in eye tissues, especially in the cornea and the vitreous body.

Page 10: Optics

READING GLASSES

• 40 years of age +1 D

• 50 years of age +2 D

• 60 years of age +3 D

Page 11: Optics
Page 12: Optics

CLASSIFICATION OF MYOPIA

• AXIAL - too long axis of the eye, normal strength of the optic system

• REFRACTIVE – normal length of the eye axis, too strong optic system

Page 13: Optics

CLASSIFICATION OF MYOPIA

LOW < -4 D

 

MEDIUM -4 – -8 D

 

HIGH > -8 D

Page 14: Optics

Country Area Age

(years)

Myopia (%)

Hyperopia (%)

Chile Urban 5-15 6.8 16.3

China Urban 5-15 35.1 0.8

China Rural 5-15 16.2 3.5

Page 15: Optics

Country Area Age

(years)

Myopia (%)

Hyperopia (%)

India Urban 5-15 7.4 7.7

India Rural 7-15 4.1 0.8

Malaysia Urban 7-15 19.3 1.3

Page 16: Optics

Country Area Age

(years)

Myopia (%)

Hyperopia (%)

Nepal Rural 5-15 1.2 1.4

Poland Urban/

Semirural

6-18 13.3 13.1

South Africa

Urban/

Semirural

5-15 2.9 1.8

Page 17: Optics

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Page 18: Optics

OCCURRENCE OF MYOPIA

• Stickler syndrome

• Marfan’s syndrome

• Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

• Weill-Marchesani syndrome

• homocystinuria

Page 19: Optics

OCCURRENCE OF MYOPIA

• McCune-Albright syndrome

• Kniest syndrome

• Down syndrome

• Prader-Will syndrome

• Noonan sydrome

Page 20: Optics

OCCURRENCE OF MYOPIA

• Cohen syndrome

• Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome

• Cornelia de Lange syndrome

• fetal alcohol syndrome

• Knobloch syndrome

Page 21: Optics

OCCURRENCE OF MYOPIA

• congenital night blindness

• deficiency of ornithine aminotransferase

• deficiency of prolidase

• premature infants

• lack of a sufficient amount of calcium, fluoride and selenium in food

Page 22: Optics

READING OR WRITING VS. MYOPIAP <0,001

READING/

WRITING

MYOPIA

PRESENT

MYOPIA

ABSENT

TOTAL

< 2 H 6,44%

(n=93)

93,56%

(n=1351)

100%

(n=1444)

2-3,5 H 12,15%

(n=269)

87,85%

(n=1945)

100%

(n=2214)

> 3,5 H 16,77%

(n=360)

83,23%

(n=1787)

100%

(n=2147)

TOTAL 12,44%

(n=722)

87,56%

(n=5083)

100%

(n=5805)

Page 23: Optics

COMPUTER VS. MYOPIAP < 0,01

COMPUTER MYOPIA

PRESENT

MYOPIA

ABSENT

TOTAL

< 0,8 H 11,45%

(n=392)

88,55%

(n=3033)

100%

(n=3425)

> 0,8 H 13,85%

(n=338)

86,15%

(n=2102)

100%

(n=2440)

TOTAL 12,45%

(n=730)

87,55%

(n=5135)

100%

(n=5865)

Page 24: Optics

TELEVISION VS. MYOPIAP > 0,05

TV MYOPIA

PRESENT

MYOPIA

ABSENT

TOTAL

< 2 H 13,76%

(n=232)

86,24%

(n=1454)

100%

(n=1686)

2-2,5 H 11,46%

(n=237)

88,54%

(n=1831)

100%

(n=2068)

> 2,5 H 12,34%

(n=253)

87,66%

(n=1798)

100%

(n=2051)

TOTAL 12,44%

(n=722)

87,56%

(n=5083)

100%

(n=5805)

Page 25: Optics

INHERITANCE OF MYOPIA

• MONOGENIC:

autosomal dominant

autosomal recessive

X-linked

• POLYGENIC:

< -6 - chromosome 1 ?

> -6 – chromosome 1-4, 7, 8, 10-12, 17, 18, 22

Page 26: Optics
Page 27: Optics

CHILDHOOD MYOPIA

• is the most often met form of myopia. It occurs before and during maturation.

Page 28: Optics

PROCEDURES IN CHILDHOOD MYOPIA

• exercises in plus glasses when looking far away

• reading in prisms• temporary usage of spectacles• keeping hygiene of the visual work:

correct illumination, reading from a distance of 30 cm, doing breaks during visual work

Page 29: Optics

PROGRESSIVE MYOPIA

• develops after birth to the 30-35 years of age. It is characterized by its fast course.

Page 30: Optics
Page 31: Optics
Page 32: Optics
Page 33: Optics

PROCEDURES IN PROGRESSIVE MYOPIA

• drugs sealing the vessels and improving circulation: Calcium, Extract vaccinium myrtillus, Pentoxifylline, Rutoside, Xantinol nicotinate

• biostimulating drugs: Aloe extract, Extract total eye, Peat bog extract, Placental extract, Sea slime extract

• vitamins: A, B1, B2, B6, B12, C, D, E, F, PP• diet with plenty of fresh fruits and vegetables

Page 34: Optics

PROCEDURES IN PROGRESSIVE MYOPIA

• permanent usage of spectacles• keeping hygiene of the visual work: correct

illumination, reading from a distance of 30 cm, doing breaks during visual work

• laser treatment: photocoagulations of degenerative changes in the retina and choroidea

Page 35: Optics
Page 38: Optics
Page 39: Optics
Page 40: Optics

SUBSTANCES INHIBITING THE PROGRESS OF EXPERIMENTAL MYOPIA

• PIRENZEPINE - antagonist of the muscarinic M1 receptors,

• APOMORPHINE - unselective agonist of the dopamine receptors.

Page 41: Optics
Page 42: Optics
Page 43: Optics
Page 44: Optics

CLASSIFICATION OF HYPEROPIA

• AXIAL - too short axis of the eye, normal strength of the optic system

 

• REFRACTIVE - normal length of the eye axis, too low strength of the optic system

• PHYSIOLOGICAL < +3 D

Page 45: Optics

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Page 46: Optics

ASTIGMATISM

• A refractive error, which causes rays of light passing through the refractive planes of the eye to be differently refracted.

Page 47: Optics
Page 48: Optics

ORIGINS OF ASTIGMATISM

• Corneal astigmatism:

deformation in the anterior and posterior surface of the cornea

• Lenticular astigmatism:

deformation in the anterior and posterior surface of the lens, decentralization of the lens, irregular refractive index of the lens

Page 49: Optics

ORIGINS OF ASTIGMATISM

• Corneo-lenticular astigmatism

• Others - for examaple deformations of the posterior part of the eyeball

Page 50: Optics

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

4

4,5

5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Page 51: Optics

ANISOMETROPIA

• Different refractive errors in the left and right eye.

 

• AXIAL - different length of the eyeball

 

• REFRACTIVE - different strength of the eye’s optic system

Page 52: Optics
Page 53: Optics
Page 54: Optics
Page 55: Optics

LACK OF FUSION

• > +5 D

• > -6 D

Page 56: Optics
Page 57: Optics

OPTICAL ADVANTAGES OF CONTACT LENSES

• Are able to fully correct even very high refractive errors.

• Do not limit the visual field.

• Do not create oblique beam astigmatism.

• Do not create aniseikonia greater than 10%.

• Do not create micropsia in high myopia.