Optical Properties and Radiative Forcing of Desert Dust at...

26
Optical Properties and Radiative Forcing of Desert Dust at Lampedusa Island: What We Have Learned Since 1999 Daniela Meloni Laboratory for Earth Observations and Analyses, ENEA, Rome 7 th International Workshop on Sand/Duststorms and Associated Dustfall 2-4 December 2013, ESA/ESRIN, Frascati (Rome), Italy

Transcript of Optical Properties and Radiative Forcing of Desert Dust at...

  • Optical Properties and Radiative Forcing of Desert Dust at Lampedusa Island: What We Have Learned Since 1999

    Daniela Meloni Laboratory for Earth Observations and Analyses, ENEA, Rome

    7th International Workshop on Sand/Duststorms and Associated Dustfall 2-4 December 2013, ESA/ESRIN, Frascati (Rome), Italy

  • Thanks to:

    Fabrizio Anello, Carlo Bommarito, Paolo Chamard, Lorenzo De Silvestri,

    Tatiana Di Iorio, Alcide di Sarra, Jose Luis Gómez-Amo, Francesco

    Monteleone, Giandomenico Pace, Salvatore Piacentino, Damiano M.

    Sferlazzo, Claudia Di Biagio, Marco Cacciani, Wolfgang Junkermann, Victor

    Estellés, Giampitro Casasanta, Virginia Ciardini, Maria Mansueto, Cecilia

    Tirelli, Chiara Volta, Jose Antonio Martinez-Lozano

  • WHY LAMPEDUSA?

    • Lampedusa island is largely affected by dust intrusions from the Sahara desert, particularly in late spring and early summer, with large aerosol optical depths and particles extending in the vertical up to 6-8 km;

    • The island hosts the ENEA Station for Climate Observations, with the aim of long-term monitoring of greenhouse gases, aerosol, radiation;

    • The ENEA Station represents an ‘open sea’ measurement site, optimal for the validation of satellite observations;

    • In the last 15 years the ENEA Station has been improving in the number and quality of measurements…

    www.lampedusa.enea.it

  • IN 1999… Brewer

    spectrophotometer Visible MultiFilter Rotating Shadowband Radiometer

    (MFRSR)

    Lidar system for tropospheric aerosols (ENEA/Univ. of Rome)

    Meteorological tower

  • … IN 2013

    AERONET CIMEL

    ENEA/Univ. of Rome LIDAR

    HATPRO

    BREWER Visible and UV MFRSR PYRANOMETER,

    PYRGEOMETER, PAR

    METEO TOWER

    RADIOSOUNDING

    ACTINOMETER

    SP02 AND SP02-L

    SHADED PYRANOMETER AND PYRGEOMETER, PYRHELIOMETER, HYPEROCR

    TSI

    HYPEROCR

  • APPROACH

    Dust optical properties and

    radiative forcing

    GROUND-BASED MEASUREMENTS

    AIRBORNE MEASUREMENTS SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS

    RADIATIVE TRANSFER MODEL SIMULATIONS

    UV-VIS IR

  • DERIVATION OF THE AEROSOL SINGLE SCATTERING ALBEDO,

    ASYMMETRY FACTOR AND OF THE DIRECT AEROSOL RADIATIVE

    FORCING IN THE UV-VISIBLE

    a) Using ground-based and airborne measurements during the Photochemical Activity and Ultraviolet Radiation modulating factors II (PAUR II) campaign in May-June 1999 b) Using ground-based measurements and Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) spaceborne observations in July 2002

  • THE PAUR II CAMPAIGN IN MAY-JUNE 1999

    Ground-based measurements: AOD, total ozone, lidar extinction profile, meteorological paramters, UV and VISIBLE spectra.

    Vertical profiles (up to 4 km) of ozone, aerosol extinction, aerosol particle size, radiation and meteorological parameters from the instrumented IMK-IFU ultralight ENDURO-KIT (P.I. dr Wolfgang Junkermann).

    Radiative transfer model libRadtran [Mayer et al., 1997], 200-800 nm, with main modifications.

    DERIVATION OF THE AEROSOL SINGLE SCATTERING ALBEDO, ASYMMETRY FACTOR AND OF THE DIRECT AEROSOL RADIATIVE FORCING IN THE UV-VISIBLE

  • METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS Comparison of measured and modelled surface Brewer UV spectra (286.5-363 nm) for cloud free-conditions to estimate the aerosol COMPLEX REFRACTIVE INDEX.

  • THE MULTI-ANGLE IMAGING SPECTRORADIOMETER (MISR)

    SPACEBORNE OBSERVATIONS IN JULY 2002

    DERIVATION OF THE AEROSOL SINGLE SCATTERING ALBEDO, ASYMMETRY FACTOR AND OF THE DIRECT AEROSOL RADIATIVE FORCING IN THE UV-VISIBLE

    AOD (500 nm) = 0.227

    14 July

    α = 0.080

    16 July α = 0.698

  • METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS

    Best match wavelength-independent SSA and g in the visible

    Simulation of the visible MFRSR global irradiances with different SSA and g minimum

    RMSD

    Simulation of the visible MISR equivalent

    reflectances with different SSA and g

    14 July SSA = 0.96-0.97

    g = 0.79-0.80

    16 July SSA = 0.88-0.89

    g = 0.81-0.82

    Meloni et al., JGR, 2004

  • DERIVATION OF THE AEROSOL SINGLE SCATTERING ALBEDO, ASYMMETRY FACTOR AND OF THE DIRECT AEROSOL RADIATIVE FORCING IN THE UV-VISIBLE

    DIRECT AEROSOL RADIATIVE FORCING CALCULATIONS 400-700 nm

    Day ω0 g Surface ADRFE (W/m2)

    TOA ADRFE (W/m2)

    18/05/1999 0.79 0.77 -54.4 -2.4

    14/07/2002 0.97 0.80 -29.4 -15.9

    16/07/2002 0.88 0.81 -44.5 -9.5

  • DERIVATION OF THE AEROSOL SINGLE SCATTERING ALBEDO IN THE

    VISIBLE-NEAR INFRARED FROM MFRSR MEASUREMENTS AND

    RADIATIVE TRANSFER SIMULATIONS

  • SSA(λ)

    Computation of look-up tables of diffuse-to-direct radiation ratio (DDR) at 415.6 and 868.7 nm (60°±2.5°SZA) by means of libRadtran.

    415.6 nm

    Measured DDR(λ) and AOD(λ)

    METHODOLOGY

  • Period: July 2001-September 2003

    RESULTS

    SSA(415.6 nm)= 0.81±0.05

    SSA(868.7 nm)= 0.94±0.05

    Meloni et al., ACP, 2006

    Period: May 1999-December 2005

    0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00

    SSA

    0.00

    0.04

    0.08

    0.12

    0.16

    RE

    LA

    TIV

    E F

    RE

    QU

    EN

    CY

    0.4 0.6 0.8

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    SS

    A

    -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    SS

    A

    SSA(415.6 nm)= 0.77±0.04

    SSA(868.7 nm)= 0.94±0.04

    Meloni et al., Atm. Env., 2007

    Uncertainty ± 0.06

  • SSA(441 nm)= 0.91±0.03

    SSA(869 nm)= 0.98±0.01

    0.4

    Cimel #172, Lampedusa, 2003-2013 Lev. 2

    Reference Wavelength (nm)

    SSA

    Meloni et al. 2003 (PAUR II)

    500 0.78-0.79

    Meloni et al. 2004 (MISR)

    400-700 0.96-0.97 0.88-0.89

    Meloni et al. 2006 415.6 868.7

    0.81±0.05 0.94±0.05

    Meloni et al. 2007 415.6 868.7

    0.77±0.04 0.94±0.04

    AERONET Lampedusa (2003-2013)

    441 869

    0.91±0.03 0.98±0.01

    Estellés et al. 2007 500 0.91±0.04

    Tafuro et al. 2006 440 0.84-0.92

    Collaud Coen et al. 2004 470 880

    0.87-0.91 0.92-0.94

    Masmoudi et al. 2003 870 0.86-0.99

    Kubilay et al. 2003 440 870

    0.93-0.98 0.97-0.99 Uncertainty ± 0.03

  • DERIVATION OF THE DIRECT AEROSOL RADIATIVE FORCING IN

    THE SHORTWAVE FROM GROUND-BASED AND SATELLITE

    MEASUREMENTS IN 2004-2007

    Co-located surface and Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) observations on Terra and Aqua platforms

  • Di Biagio et al., JGR, 2009

    Direct method [Satheesh and Ramanathan, 2000]:

    METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS

    Desert dust (DD)

    AOD (495.7 nm)

  • Di Biagio et al., JGR, 2009, 2010

    RESULTS

  • DERIVATION OF THE AEROSOL OPTICAL PROPERTIES AND OF

    THE DIRECT AEROSOL RADIATIVE FORCING IN THE

    SHORTWAVE AND LONGWAVE

    DURING THE GROUND-BASED AND AIRBORNE

    MEASUREMENTS OF AEROSOL RADIATIVE FORCING (GAMARF)

    CAMPAIGN IN APRIL-MAY 2008

    The EU European Fleet for Airborne Research (EUFAR) project supported 6 flights (12 hours) performed by the IMK-IFU ultralight ENDURO-KIT (P.I. dr Wolfgang Junkermann).

    Two pyrgeometers measured upward and downward LW irradiance: one Kipp&Zonen CGR4 and one Eppley PIR.

  • GROUND-BASED MEASUREMENTS

    Univ. of Barcelona CIMEL Sunphotometer

  • Profile of the aerosol backscatter ratio at 532 nm

    F3 F5

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    DURING THE FLIGHT (6:11-8:17) AOD 500 nm = 0.60 ± 0.02

    AE = 0.36 ± 0.01

    DURING THE FLIGHT (6:07-8:13) AOD 500 nm = 0.14 ± 0.01

    AE = 1.19 ± 0.11

  • METHODOLOGY

    Simulation with the Modtran 4.2 model [Berk at al., 1998] of: a)Measured downward SW and LW irradiances (SW ↓ and LW↓) at surface; b)Measured LW↓ profiles; c)Aerosol-free SW and LW profiles. Calculation of surface, top of the atmosphere (TOA) and atmospheric SW and LW ADRF and ADRFE.

    AEROSOL OPTICAL PROPERTIES FROM Optical Properties of Aerosol and Clouds (OPAC) database [Hess et al., 1998]: 3 MAY: Desert Dust with 98% RH 5 MAY: Continental Polluted with 98% RH

  • RESULTS

    5 MAY 2008

    RMSE (240-2700 m) = 1.8 Wm-2

    Model simulations reproduce the surface downward SW and LW irradiances within measurement uncertainties.

    FIRST DESCENT

  • SECOND ASCENT

    SZA=47°

    RMSE (240-2700 m) = 2.7 Wm-2

    SW ADRF (Wm-2)

    SW ADRFE (Wm-2)

    LW ADRF (Wm-2)

    LW ADRFE (Wm-2)

    LW/SW (%)

    TOA -19.8 -34.7 4.1 7.2 21

    ATMOSPHERE 52.7 92.1 -7.6 -13.3 14

    SURFACE -72.5 -126.8 11.7 20.5 16

    3 MAY 2008

  • SW and LW simulations using:

    • the aerosol size distribution from the Cimel inversion with suitable refractive index;

    • the aerosol size distribution from the airborne GRIMM measurements with suitable

    refractive index.

    NEXT STEP

    Thank you