Opposition Exhibits - CREW v. DOJ: Regarding Documents in Closed Investigation of Rep. Don Young:...

8/4/2019 Opposition Exhibits - CREW v. DOJ: Regarding Documents in Closed Investigation of Rep. Don Young: 9/6/2011 - 12

1/49

EXHIBIT A

Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington v. U.S.Department of Justice, Civ. No. 11-0754 (GK)

Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and

Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment

Case 1:11-cv-00754-GK Document 12-2 Filed 09/06/11 Page 1 of 4


2/49

This copy is for your personal, noncommercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution

to your colleagues, clients or customers, please click here or use the "Reprints" tool that appears next to any

article. Visit www.nytreprints.comfor samples and additional information. Order a reprint of this article now.

June 7, 2007

Alaskan Gets Campaign Cash; Florida Road Gets U.S.Funds

By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK

It is no secret that campaign contributions sometimes lead to lucrative official favors. Rarely, though,

are the tradeoffs quite as obvious as in the twisted case of Coconut Road.

The road, a stretch of pavement near Fort Myers, Fla., that touches five golf clubs on its way to the Gul

of Mexico, is the target of a $10 million earmark that appeared mysteriously in a 2006 transportation

bill written by Representative Don Young, Republican of Alaska.

Mr. Young, who last year steered more than $200 million to a so-called bridge to nowhere reaching 80

people on Gravina Island, Alaska, has no constituents in Florida.

The Republican congressman whose district does include Coconut Road says he did not seek the

money. County authorities have twice voted not to use it, until Mr. Young and the district congressman

wrote letters warning that a refusal could jeopardize future federal money for the county.

The Coconut Road money is a boon, however, to Daniel J. Aronoff, a real estate developer who helped

raise $40,000 for Mr. Young at the nearby Hyatt Coconut Point hotel days before he introduced the

measure.

Mr. Aronoff owns as much as 4,000 acres along Coconut Road. The $10 million in federal money

would pay for the first steps to connect the road to Interstate 75, multiplying the value of Mr. Aronoff's

land.

He did not return phone calls seeking comment. A consultant who helped push for the project spelled

out why its supporters held the fund-raiser.

''We were looking for a lot of money,'' said the consultant, Joe Mazurkiewicz. ''We evidently made a

very good impression on Congressman Young, and thanks to a lot of great work from Congressman

Young, we got $81 million to expand Interstate 75 and $10 million for the Coconut Road interchange.'

Mr. Young's role, first reported by The Naples Daily News, has escalated objections to the project.

Environmentalists say the interchange would threaten wetlands. And a Republican commissioner of

Lee County, Ray Judah, is campaigning against the interchange, calling it an example of Congressiona

corruption that is ''a cancer on the federal government.''



3/49

''It would appear that Don Young was doing a favor for a major contributor,'' Mr. Judah said.

The turmoil occurs at an awkward time for Mr. Young. A corruption scandal involving an Alaskan oil

company has rattled the Republican Party in Alaska, and Mr. Young is among the biggest recipients of

the company's campaign donations.

One of his former top aides, Mark Zachares, has pleaded guilty to separate bribery charges involving

the lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

House Republicans, meanwhile, are in a public relations battle with Democrats for the high ground on

reforming ''earmarks,'' the pet projects that lawmakers tuck into spending bills behind closed doors.

As they have exploded in number for the last 12 years -- the 2006 transportation bill included more

than 6,300 projects worth more than $24 billion, the nonpartisan Taxpayers For Common Sense says

- earmarks have proven ripe for cronyism, corruption and abuse. Though the House recently passed a

rule requiring the disclosure of earmark sponsors, the flow does not appear to have slowed.

Until Democrats took control of Congress in January, Mr. Young was chairman of the TransportationCommittee, and he and his staff distributed transportation earmarks to lawmakers seeking projects.

Mr. Young may have first learned of Coconut Road on Feb. 17, 2005. That is when he flew to the region

on a plane owned by Corporate Flight, a Waterford, Mich., charter company that is associated with the

Aronoff family, which is based in nearby Bloomfield Hills, Mich. The Aronoffs are among the

company's biggest clients, said its general manager, Tom Hector.

Mr. Young's re-election campaign reimbursed the company $3,422 for the flight, his campaign filings

show.

At the invitation of the congressman from the district, Connie Mack, Mr. Young visited Florida Gulf

Coast University for a meeting on the Interstate and other transportation questions. Afterward, Mr.

Young went directly to the fund-raiser at the Hyatt Coconut Point.

His campaign records show that he received more than $40,000 in contributions on one day around

that time, mostly from southwestern Florida developers and builders. Mr. Aronoff gave $500 to Mr.

Young's campaign and later gave $2,500 to Mr. Young's Midnight Sun political action committee.

The invitations to the event listed as hosts Mr. Mack, a business group called the Southwest Florida

Transportation Initiative that includes Mr. Aronoff's company and two executives of other Floridadevelopers.

Asked in a telephone interview who had organized the fund-raiser, Mr. Mazurkiewicz, the consultant,

said he was then at another fund-raiser with a member of Mr. Mack's staff who would know.

''Aronoff,'' the staff member told Mr. Mazurkiewicz, within earshot of his mobile phone.

''Just some local businessmen,'' Mr. Mazurkiewicz said into the phone. When pressed, he confirmed



4/49

that the staff member had named Mr. Aronoff. Later, Mr. Mazurkiewicz called again to list the names

on the invitation.

The Aronoffs, major Republican donors, gave more than $200,000 to Republican candidates and

political committees in the 2006 election. Their business, the Landon Companies, is best known for

building mobile-home parks. But it also operates a real estate development business in Florida.

Daniel Aronoff has taken over active management of the company from his father, Arnold Y. Aronoff,

who had a checkered career in Florida real estate. In 1979, Arnold Aronoff was sentenced to two years

in prison after pleading guilty to mail fraud in a scheme to sell Florida swampland at an inflated price.

When he was approached near the House floor by a reporter, Mr. Young responded with an obscene

gesture.

A spokeswoman for Mr. Young, Meredith Kenny, initially said that Mr. Mack had requested the

Coconut Road money. A spokesman for Mr. Mack, however, said he did not ask for the money. His

chief of staff, Jeff Cohen, said Mr. Mack was surprised to find the project in the bill long after it had

passed. ''At the end of the day this thing got stuck in there unbeknownst to us and having nothing to dwith us, other than it is our district,'' Mr. Cohen said.

The plans for the earmark and the Aronoff land hit a roadblock when the Lee County Metropolitan

Planning Organization voted twice last year to block a preliminary study for the interchange, mainly

on environmental grounds. Studies by the Army Corps of Engineers, the Environmental Protection

Agency, the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Federal Highway Administration have all warned that

the proposed interchange could threaten wetlands.

But Mr. Young was evidently determined to see the interchange move forward. In a Jan. 23, 2006,

letter to the chairman of the planning agency, Mr. Young warned that his committee would draft

another bill taking away the $10 million if it was not used for the interchange.

On Jan. 31, Mr. Mack followed up with a letter warning that the rejection would ''make it difficult for

Southwest Florida to have future success in securing federal resources for other important projects.''

The planning organization subsequently reversed itself and approved an initial study of the proposed

interchange. But the last election put more environmentalists on the county commission. Next month,

county planners will again take up the question of what to do about Coconut Road.

Photo: Representative Don Young of Alaska, backer of a Florida road. (Photo by Lauren Victoria

Burke/Associated Press)(pg. A28)

Map of Florida highlighting Coconut Road and site of planned interchange: The $10 million earmark

would help extend Coconut Road. (pg. A28)

Copyright 2011The New York Times Company Home Privacy Policy Search Corrections XML Help Contact Us



5/49

EXHIBIT B






6/49

Report shows someone edited federal

transportation bill

Study: Phrase 'Coconut Road interchange' slipped into $10Mearmark after congressional vote

By JULIO OCHOA

Originally published 11:21 a.m., August 8, 2007

Updated 05:31 a.m., August 9, 2007

The words "Coconut Road interchange" were not in the federal transportation bill

approved by Congress in 2005.

Those words were attached to a $10 million earmark sometime after the House andSenate votes but before the president signed the bill into law.

Within that time, someone with access to the bill deleted the earmarks original

language that would have given $10 million more for widening and improvements to

Interstate 75 and attached the phrase "Coconut Rd. interchange I-75/Lee County,"

according to a study by a former federal official who lives on Sanibel Island.

At the time, the interchange was not in Lee Countys 30-year plans.

"Its amazing. That is all I can say," said Don Eslick, chairman of the Estero Council of

Community Leaders, which opposes the Coconut Road interchange. "It certainly tends

to point the finger at (Don) Young," the Republican congressman from Alaska who was

chairman of the Transportation Committee when the bill passed in 2005.

Young visited Southwest Florida in early 2005 to attend a town hall meeting.

While in town, Daniel Aronoff, a wealthy part-time Naples resident who owns property

east of Coconut Road and would benefit from the interchange, held a fundraiser for

Young.

Many believe the fundraiser and Aronoffs financial influence were the reason Youngallegedly earmarked money for the interchange.

The report by Darla Letourneau, a former deputy assistant secretary for the U.S.

Department of Labor, also states that Lee County does not lose the $10 million if it

doesnt proceed with a study of the controversial interchange, as some politicians have

professed. In fact, county leaders could follow an established process to change the

bills language so the money could be used for other more pressing projects within the

county, Letourneau wrote in the report.



7/49

The new information made local leaders Wednesday further question the motives for

the earmark and consider changing a controversial decision to study the interchange

once again.

"My feeling is that weve been operating in a fog for the past year and a half," said

Carla Brooks Johnston, chairwoman of the Lee County Metropolitan Planning

Organization, who asked Letourneau to look into the issue.

"This money really should be designated for a higher priority," added Lee County

Commissioner Ray Judah, who is also a member of the MPO. "It should have been

spent for I-75 to begin with."

The language within the earmark was changed during a process called "bill

enrollment," when technical corrections are made to legislation before being sent to the

president. Such corrections include changes to punctuation, section numbers or

updates to reflect final actions taken by the House and Senate.

"This goes beyond the intent of the technical corrections process," said Keith Ashdown,

a researcher for the Taxpayers for Common Sense, a Washington, D.C., watchdog

group. "Its supposed to be about getting your punctuation right, not about making sure

that your major benefactor is getting their pork."

The correction process can often be rushed, between the bills passage and its signing,

Ashdown said. The change was made on page 367 of the 800-page bill.

"This is not how the process is supposed to work," he said. "Ive seen little gimmicks

and little tricks used to make sure somebodys friend or contributor is taken care of but

this is by far one of the more underhanded, surreptitious examples Ive seen ever."

Young could not be reached for comment.

Letourneaus report also outlines a process by which Lee County leaders can

reallocate the money, despite what they have been told in the past. In letters to county

leaders, Young and U.S. Rep. Connie Mack, R-Fort Myers, warned that the money

could be lost and future funding jeopardized should it be rejected.

The process to reallocate the funding would take legislative approval, but is a common

practice that only requires a sponsor, Letourneau said.

"If this had come to light right after the bill had passed, there would have been a very

quick technical amendment," she said. "This should not have happened."

Jeff Cohen, Macks chief of staff, said the congressman will follow the will of the

people.

"We support the need for local leaders to make local decisions and will continue to

support their decisions," Cohen said.

Local leaders have until 2009 to request a change. In the meantime, the state could



8/49

use some of the money for another project as long as it is repaid when the funding is

reallocated.

The decision to continue with an interchange study or use the money for something

else is up to the MPO, said Johnston. Needed improvements to Corkscrew Road and

Bonita Beach Road are worthy alternatives, she said. The MPOs next meeting is on

Aug. 17. A discussion on the interchange is already scheduled.

After more than a year of discussing the issue, Johnston made a successful motion in

the spring to move forward with the study as long as environmental protections were in

place and the MPO was involved in all decisions.

But she never felt confident that she had the whole story.

"I believe in looking at the law and official records of the documents," Johnston said.

"We are not a country of peoples opinions. We are a country of laws and that is how

we make our decisions.

2011 Scripps Newspaper Group Online



9/49

EXHIBIT C






10/49



11/49



12/49

EXHIBIT D






13/49



14/49

EXHIBIT E






15/49

119 STAT. 1485PUBLIC LAW 10959AUG. 10, 2005

SEC. 1931. RICHARD NIXON PARKWAY, CALIFORNIA.

(a) DESIGNATION

.The segment of the Imperial Highwaylocated between California State Route 91 and Esperanza Roadin the State of California shall be known and designated as theRichard Nixon Parkway.

(b) REFERENCES.Any reference in a law, map, regulation,document, paper, or other record of the United States to the high-way segment referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to bea reference to the Richard Nixon Parkway.

SEC. 1932. AMO HOUGHTON BYPASS.

(a) DESIGNATION.The 3-mile segment of Interstate Route 86between its interchange with New York State Route 15 in thevicinity of Painted Post, New York, and its interchange with New York State Route 352 in the vicinity of Corning, New York, shallbe known and designated as the Amo Houghton Bypass.

(b) REFERENCES.Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the high-way segment referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to bea reference to the Amo Houghton Bypass.

SEC. 1933. BILLY TAUZIN ENERGY CORRIDOR.

(a) DESIGNATION.Louisiana Route 1 shall be known and des-ignated as the Billy Tauzin Energy Corridor.

(b) REFERENCES.Any reference in a law, map, regulation,document, paper, or other record of the United States to the high-way segment referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to bea reference to the Billy Tauzin Energy Corridor.

SEC. 1934. TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS.

(a) AUTHORIZATION OFAPPROPRIATIONS.(1) IN GENERAL.For each of fiscal years 2005 through

2009, there are authorized to be appropriated from the HighwayTrust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account) such sumsas are necessary to make allocations in accordance with para-graph (2) to carry out each project described in the table con-tained in subsection (c), at the amount specified for each suchproject in that table.

(2) ALLOCATION PERCENTAGES.Of the total amount speci-fied for each project described in the table contained in sub-section (c), 10 percent for fiscal year 2005, 20 percent forfiscal year 2006, 25 percent for fiscal year 2007, 25 percentfor fiscal year 2008, and 20 percent for fiscal year 2009 shallbe allocated to carry out each such project in that table.(b) CONTRACTAUTHORITY.

(1) IN GENERAL.Funds authorized to be appropriated tocarry out this subsection shall be available for obligation inthe same manner as if the funds were apportioned under

chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, except that thefunds shall remain available until expended.(2) FEDERAL SHARE.The Federal share of the cost of a

project under this section shall be determined in accordancewith section 120 of such title.(c) TABLE.The table referred to in subsections (a) and (b)

is as follows:

Louisiana.

New York.

VerDate 14-DEC-2004 12:11 Sep 09, 2005 Jkt 039139 PO 00059 Frm 00343 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL059.109 APPS06 PsN: PUBL059



16/49

119 STAT. 1486 PUBLIC LAW 10959AUG. 10, 2005

Transportation Improvements

No. State Project Description Amount

1. AK Denali Commission for docks, waterfront develop-ment projects and related transportation infra-structure .................................................................. $20,000,000

2. AK Improvements to the Knik Arm Bridge .. .. .. ... .. ... .. .. . $20,000,000

3. AK Upgrades on the Dalton Highway, including butnot limited to design, engineering, permitting,and construction ..................................................... $500,000

4. AK Upgrades on the Richardson Highway, includingbut not limited to design, engineering, permit-ting, and construction ............................................ $500,000

5. AK Anchorage: Intermodal facility improvements atthe Port of Anchorage ............................................ $7,000,000

6. AK Petersburg: Road improvements, including but notlimited to design, engineering, permitting, andconstruction ............................................................. $500,000

7. AK Tanana: Dust Control Mitigation ............................. $500,000

8. AK Anchorage: Dimond Center Intermodal Facility, in-cluding but not limited to design, engineering,permitting, and construction ................................. $500,000

9. AK Homer: Intermodal deep-water dock facility im-provements .............................................................. $2,000,000

10. AK Anchorage: Study, design, and engineering of Knikcrossing approach routes to minimize traffic con-gestion ..................................................................... $2,000,000

11. AK Sitka: World War II Causeway Trail and Multi-usePathway projects .................................................... $1,000,000

12. AK McGrath: Road erosion control along the YukonRiver ........................................................................ $500,000

13. AK Ketchikan: Improve marine dry-dock and facilities $20,000,000

14. AL Preliminary Engineering, Design, Right-Of-Way Acquisition and Construction of the TuscaloosaBypass, Alabama .................................................... $5,000,000

15. AL Preliminary Engineering, Design, Right-Of-Way Acquisition and Construction of the I10 Con-nector, Alabama ...................................................... $5,000,000

16. AL Preliminary Engineering, Design, Right-Of-Way

Acquisition and Construction of the I85 Exten-sion, Alabama ......................................................... $50,000,000

17. CA Century Boulevard Pedestrian Safety and Trans-portation Improvements in City of Inglewood ..... $3,000,000




17/49


Transportation ImprovementsContinued


18. CA Hilmar/Turlock California Highway 99 Inter-change Engineering and Construction in MercedCounty ..................................................................... $1,000,000

19. CA Port of Hueneme Intermodal Access Improvement Access Improvement Project, including gradeseparation at Rice Avenue and State Route 34;widen Hueneme Road ............................................ $1,000,000

20. CA Widen Northbound I405 between I10 and U.S.101 for HOV Lane .................................................. $30,000,000

21. CA Alameda Corridor East Construction Authority .. .. .. $30,000,000

22. CO Improvements to I70/Havana/Yosemite Inter-change ...................................................................... $3,000,000

23. CO Improvements to Wadsworth and U.S. 36 Inter-change in Broomfield ............................................. $2,000,000

24. CO Improvements to Bromley Lane and U.S. 85 Inter-change ...................................................................... $1,000,000

25. CO Improvements to C470 and U.S. 85 Interchange .... $4,000,000

26. CO Improvements to Hwy 34 and I25 Interchange(Loveland/Greeley exit) .......................................... $2,000,000

27. CO Improvements to Hwy 16 and I25 Interchange(Fort CarsonPhase I) .......................................... $3,000,000

28. CO Improvements to Hwy 50 from Las Animas toLamar ...................................................................... $12,000,000

29. CO Improvements to Hwy 395 and I25 (at Windsorexit) .......................................................................... $2,000,000

30. CO Improvements to Pecos Street Overpass (AdamsCounty) .................................................................... $3,000,000

31. CO Improvements to U.S. 285 and Deer Creek Inter-change ...................................................................... $1,000,000

32. CO Improvements to U.S. 50 and Hwy 115 (safety im-provements) ............................................................. $2,000,000

33. CO Improvements to Glenwood Springs Bridge ............ $1,000,000

34. CO Improvements to 104th and U.S. 85 Intersection ... $1,000,000

35. CT Development and demonstration in Connecticut of

fuel cell technologies for buses in urban areas .... $5,000,00036. CT Improvements to I95 in Connecticut, including

the Pearl Harbor Memorial/Q Bridge, from theState border with New York to the State borderwith Rhode Island .................................................. $50,000,000




18/49




37. DE Planning, Design, and Construction of the EnergyExploration Center at Destination Station in Re-hoboth Beach .......................................................... $1,000,000

38. DE Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Anal-ysis of the Middletown to Newark Rail Connec-tion ........................................................................... $4,000,000

39. DE Develop and construct an alternative route fortruck traffic in the core downtown area of Har-rington ..................................................................... $8,500,000

40. DE Build the Pomeroy Line Pedestrian/Bicycle Trailand Facility in Newark .......................................... $4,771,000

41. DE Infrastructure and Streetscape Improvements on

Rehoboth Avenue in Rehoboth .............................. $6,750,000

42. DE University of Delawares Automotive Based FuelCell Hybrid Bus Program in Newark ................... $4,979,000

43. DE Design and Construct the Indian River InletBridge on SR 1 in Sussex County ......................... $5,000,000

44. FL Tamiami Trail Skyway Transportation Study ......... $1,000,000

45. FL Sand Lake Road Improvements between Presi-dents Drive and I4 ............................................... $3,000,000

46. FL New systems interchange ramps at SR 417 andBoggy Creek Road in Orange County, Florida ..... $2,000,000

47. FL Florida SIS projects in Miami-Dade County ............ $5,000,000

48. FL Hillsborough County I4 Crosstown ConnectorConstruction of I4 crosstown connector from I4to Port of Tampa ..................................................... $7,000,000

49. FL Sand Lake Road Improvements between Presi-dents Drive and I4 ................................................ $6,000,000

50. FL Gulf Coast Parkway, Final design, engineering,and construction for a 2-lane Gulf Coast/U.S. 98bypass ...................................................................... $7,000,000

51. GA Queens Road widening and reconstruction CobbCounty ..................................................................... $1,000,000

52. GA Widening Cedarcrest Rd. from Paulding County toGovernors Towne ................................................... $1,000,000

53. GA U.S. 84 Connector/Bypass from west of U.S. 84/SR119 west of Hinesville to U.S. 84/SR 196 south ofFlemington, Liberty County .................................. $1,000,000

54. GA SR 746/SE Rome Bypass from SR 101 U.S. 411Floyd County ........................................................... $4,000,000




19/49




55. GA SR 204/Abercorn Street from King George Boule-vard to Rio Road widening .................................... $4,000,000

56. GA SR 96 from I75 to old Hawkinsville Road wid-ening and reconstruction ....................................... $4,000,000

57. GA SR 40 from west of CR 61 to SR 25/U.S. 17 wid-ening ........................................................................ $4,000,000

58. GA SR 40 from east of St. Marys cut off at mile post5.0, Charlton County, to County Route 61, Cam-den County Widening ............................................. $2,000,000

59. GA I75 interchanges from north of Tifton to TurnerCounty line interchange reconstruction ............... $4,000,000

60. GA I75/Windy Hill Road interchange reconstruction,Cobb County ............................................................ $5,000,000

61. GA Interchange capacity improvements at I285 andAshford-Dunwoody Road ........................................ $3,000,000

62. GA I75/CR 65/Union Grove RoadNew interchange,Gordon County ........................................................ $3,500,000

63. GA SR 85 widening from Adams Drive to I75 and re-construct the Forest Parkway interchange .......... $3,500,000

64. GA City of Jesup, Georgia for transportation improve-ments ....................................................................... $2,500,000

65. GA Walker County, Georgia for transportation im-provements .............................................................. $2,500,000

66. GA Catoosa County, Georgia for transportation im-provements .............................................................. $2,500,000

67. GA I75/CR 665/Carbondale Road interchange recon-struction, Whitfield County ................................... $4,000,000

68. GA U.S. 411/SR 20 Access Rights from Floyd Countyto U.S. 41/SR 3 for transportation improvements $3,500,000

69. HI Saddle Road traffic improvements on the Island ofHawaii ..................................................................... $10,000,000

70. HI Kapolei traffic improvements on the Island ofOahu ........................................................................ $5,000,000

71. HI Queen Kaahumanu Highway traffic improvementson the Island of Hawaii ......................................... $5,000,000

72. IA Iowa State University, National Center for Port-land Cement Concrete Pavement Technology ...... $10,000,000

73. IA University of Northern Iowa, Native Roadside Vegetation Enhancement Center, constructionand equipment ........................................................ $1,000,000




20/49




74. IA University of Iowa, Public Policy CenterFieldTest of Onboard Computer Assessment of High-way User Fees ........................................................ $4,000,000

75. IA Drake University, 28th and Carpenter Streets Im-provements, Des Moines ........................................ $1,500,000

76. IA Loess Hills Scenic Byways/Resource Protection,Western Iowa .......................................................... $330,000

77. IA Great River Road National Scenic Byway, Riversto the Sea, Dubuque County ................................. $5,000,000

78. IA Great River Road National Scenic Byway, MudLake Road, Dubuque County ................................. $600,000

79. IA Great River Road National Scenic Byway, Ren-ovating Old Fort Madision ..................................... $37,445

80. IA Great River Road National Scenic Byway, LouisaCounty ..................................................................... $1,700,000

81. IA Great River Road National Scenic Byway,Montrose .................................................................. $73,500

82. IA Wapsi-Great Western Trail System, Mitchell andHoward Counties .................................................... $2,300,000

83. IA Lewis and Clark Trail Study .................................... $250,000

84. IA Recreation Trail, Comanche to Clinton .................... $2,100,000

85. IA Mississippi River Trail, Heritage Trail, DubuqueCounty ..................................................................... $1,680,000

86. IA Mississippi River Trail, Bridge at Credit Island,Davenport ................................................................ $2,000,000

87. IA Mississippi River Trail, Leach Park in Bettendorfto Riverdale ............................................................. $2,165,000

88. IA American Discovery Trail, Hoover Nature Trailconnect to Ely ......................................................... $200,000

89. IA American Discovery Trail, connection to ClearCreek Trail, Coralville ........................................... $450,000

90. IA Downtown Improvement Project, DeWitt ................ $1,700,000

91. IA 19th Avenue North Connector, Clinton .................... $1,500,000

92. IA McCollister Boulevard, Iowa City (HP: 830) ............ $3,000,000

93. IA County Home Road, Linn County ............................. $1,200,000

94. IA Collins Road, Cedar Rapids ... .. ... .. .. ... .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. . $6,000,000

95. IA I80/Middle Road Interchange Justification Reportwith Environmental Assessment, Bettendorf ...... $500,000




21/49




96. IA Highway K35, Woodbury County ........................... $1,000,000

97. IA National Transportation Heroes Center and Re-gional Transportation Archival, Research, andLibrary Center, Grinnell ........................................ $3,600,000

98. IA Highway 4 Underpass, Jefferson .. .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... $3,000,000

99. IA IA 92 Project, Indianola ... .. .. ... .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. $2,000,000

100. IA Rehabilitation and Retrofit of Historic BooneCounty Wagon Bridge ............................................ $800,000

101. IA Lincoln Highway Rehabilitation and RestorationProject, Woodbine ................................................... $203,870

102. IA IA 57/West 1st Street Reconstruction, Cedar Falls $3,000,000103. IA Scotch Ridge Project, Carlisle .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... $2,022,000

104. IA U.S. 63 Improvements, Chickasaw, Bremer, andBlack Hawk Counties (HP: 858) ........................... $1,486,185

105. IA Study of Direct Link to I80, Pella (HP: 54) ........... $110,000

106. IA Construction of 100th Street Interchange on I35/80, Urbandale (HP: 86) .......................................... $220,000

107. IA Central Iowa Trail Loop, Ankeny to Woodward(HP: 146) ................................................................. $720,000

108. IA Study for NE Beltway, Polk County (HP: 209) ....... $110,000

109. IA Widening University Boulevard, Clive (HP: 275) .... $220,000

110. IA Reconstruction of NW Madrid Drive, Polk County(HP: 396) ................................................................. $220,000

111. IA Widening of Highway 44, Grimes (HP: 834) ............ $2,020,000

112. IA NW 70th Avenue Reconstruction, Johnston (HP:848) .......................................................................... $2,100,000

113. IA U.S. 6 Final Phase of Safety Improvements,Coralville (HP: 1098) .............................................. $440,000

114. IA Construct IA32 Arterial from U.S. 20 to U.S. 61and 151, Dubuque (HP: 1145) ............................... $4,180,000

115. IA Construct Trail from Musser Park to WeggensRoad, Muscatine (HP: 1243) .................................. $110,000

116. IA Reconstruction of Neal Smith Trail, Polk County

(HP: 1284) ............................................................... $792,000117. IA Reconstruction of NE 56th Street, Eastern Polk

County (HP: 1540) .................................................. $220,000

118. IA Hoeven Corridor/Outer Drive Project, Sioux City(HP: 1581) ............................................................... $440,000




22/49




119. IA Phase III of Main Street Project, Amana (HP:1791) ........................................................................ $220,000

120. IA Improvements at IA 146 and I80 Interchange,Grinnell (HP: 2182) ................................................ $220,000

121. IA Construct SW Connector, West Des Moines (HP:2248) ........................................................................ $3,440,000

122. IA U.S. 20 Mississippi River Bridges and Approaches,Dubuque (HP: 2574) ............................................... $5,500,000

123. IA I35 Interchange Improvements, Ankeny (HP:2837) ........................................................................ $1,100,000

124. IA Construction of NW 26th Street Interchange I35,

Polk County (HP: 3258) ......................................... $220,000125. IA Construct Principal Riverwalk, Des Moines (HP:

3298) ........................................................................ $1,100,000

126. IA Design, rehabilitation and construction of ClearCreek Greenway and associated trails in John-son County .............................................................. $800,000

127. IA Design and construction of Central IA Trail Loopfrom Ankeny to Woodward .................................... $1,000,000

128. IA Design, ROW and construction of Ely ConnectorTrail in Linn County .............................................. $400,000

129. IA Reconstruction of rail line from Oelwein to DeWar $1,000,000

130. IA Purchase and rehabilitation of 9 mile Rail spur toBondurant ............................................................... $1,000,000

131. IA ROW and construction of Mississippi River Trailand related trails in Dubuque County .................. $1,000,000

132. IA ROW and construction of Mississippi River Trailand related trails in Scott-Muscatine Counties ... $1,000,000

133. IA Construction of SW Arterial, IA32 Dubuque ......... $6,800,000

134. IA Construction of Cedar Falls trails . ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. . $1,000,000

135. IA Construction of Hwy 63 in Waterloo ........................ $3,000,000

136. IA Kimberly Road improvements and construction inDavenport ................................................................ $3,000,000

137. IA Mississippi River Trail, Allamakee County ............. $4,900,000

138. IA U.S. 71 Bypass, Spencer ... .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. ... .. .. ... .. . $5,000,000139. ID Transportation improvements to widen U.S. 95,

Worley to Mica Creek ............................................. $5,000,000

140. ID Transportation Improvements to Improve SH 75,Timmerman to Ketchum ........................................ $2,000,000




23/49




141. ID Construct Interchange on I84 at Ten-Mile Road,Meridian, Idaho ...................................................... $2,000,000

142. ID Reconstruct Grangemont Road (ID Forest Hwy 67)from Orofino to MP 9.3, Segment I, II, and III .... $1,000,000

143. IL Preconstruction and construction activities of U.S.51 between Decatur and Vandalia ........................ $7,500,000

144. IL Preconstruction and construction of North-SouthWacker Drive in Chicago ....................................... $15,000,000

145. IL Construct new Mississippi River Bridge and re-lated roads in the vicinity of East St. Louis ........ $14,000,000

146. IL Replace I74 Bridge in Quad Cities (Moline) .......... $3,500,000

147. IL Conduct study of U.S. 67 bridge over Illinois Riverin Beardstown ......................................................... $2,000,000

148. IL Improvements to the intersection of IL 13 and 37in Marion ................................................................. $1,000,000

149. IL Construction to improve access of Interstate 57/64in Mount Vernon .................................................... $2,000,000

150. IL Construction of Joliet Arsenal Road Improvementsin Will County ........................................................ $1,000,000

151. IL Continue expansion of IL 336 in Macomb-Peoria ... $2,000,000

152. IL Preconstruction and construction of IL 13 Con-nector in Harrisburg .............................................. $2,000,000

153. IN Improvements to existing roadway/railroad cross-ings, City of Vincennes, Indiana ........................... $5,000,000

154. IN Improvements to existing rail-highway crossings,City of Elkhart, Indiana ........................................ $5,000,000

155. KS Widen South Meridian Street from 47th StreetSouth to 71st Street South in Sedgwick County,KS ............................................................................ $3,000,000

156. KS Widen 21st Street North, eastward from Hwy K96 to the Butler County line in Sedgwick County $2,600,000

157. KS Reconstruction of railroad and road grade separa-tion project eliminating four high volume atgrade crossings on Ridgeview Street, Santa FeStreet, Loula Street, and Park Street in Olathe,KS ............................................................................ $2,000,000

158. KS Construction of South Bypass for Highway 56 inGreat Bend .............................................................. $2,000,000

159. KS Street and sidewalk replacement in downtown FortScott ......................................................................... $400,000




24/49




160. KS Construction and improvements to RS 255 south ofU.S. Highway 156 associated with the HorseThief Reservoir in Hodgeman County .................. $3,600,000

161. KS Bridge replacement on Johnson Drive and Nall Ave. associated with the Rock Creek Project inMission .................................................................... $1,200,000

162. KS Reconstruction of the box under U.S. Highway 56on Windsor Lane associated with the Rock CreekProject in Fairway .................................................. $200,000

163. KS Reconstruction of the Mission Road Bridge associ-ated with the Rock Creek Project in Fairway, KS $1,000,000

164. KS Rehabilitation and reconstruction of U.S. 169 and

interchange with U.S. 166 in Montgomery Coun-ty .............................................................................. $2,000,000

165. KS U.S. Highway 50 Shoulder widening betweenDodge City and Garden City, KS .......................... $2,000,000

166. KY 21st Century Parks Project in Louisville, Kentucky $38,000,000

167. KY Construction of new I65 Interchange in WarrenCounty, Kentucky ................................................... $12,000,000

168. KY Owensboro Riverfront Development Project inOwensboro, Kentucky ............................................. $10,000,000

169. KY Transportation Improvements to AAI275 Con-nector, Campbell County ....................................... $8,000,000

170. KY Transportation Improvements to U.S. 60Owensboro, Daviess County .................................. $2,000,000

171. LA Construction of the Leeville Bridge from PortFouchon to Golden Meadow ................................... $10,000,000

172. MA Construct rail freight corridor improvements be-tween Boston and Worcester ................................. $9,000,000

173. MA Design and construct bicycle and pedestrian trailsin Barnstable County ............................................. $3,000,000

174. MA Rutherford Avenue Improvements in Boston .......... $9,000,000

175. MA Design and construct roadway and streetscape im-provements along State Street in Springfield ...... $5,000,000

176. MA Construct I91 Corridor Intelligent TransportationSystem Communications Network, Hampden,Hampshire, and Franklin Counties ...................... $4,000,000

177. MA Design and construct roadway and streetscape im-provements along Main Street and MaywoodStreet, Worcester, MA ............................................ $2,000,000




25/49




178. MA Design and construct downtown roadway andstreetscape improvements in Brockton ................. $2,000,000

179. MA Design, engineering, and construction at I93 TheJunction Interchange, Andover, Tewksbury, andWilmington .............................................................. $4,000,000

180. MA Gainsborough St. and St. Botolph Street Improve-ments in Boston ...................................................... $2,000,000

181. MD Upgrade MD 175 in Anne Arundel County betweenMD 170 and BW Parkway ..................................... $5,000,000

182. MD Improve U.S. 40, MD 715 interchange at AberdeenProving Ground ...................................................... $5,000,000

183. MD Upgrade MD 4 at Suitland Parkway ... .. ... .. .. ... .. ... .. .. $5,000,000

184. MD Construct Fort McHenry Visitors Center and re-lated parking facilities ........................................... $2,000,000

185. ME Plan and construct North-South Aroostook high-ways to improve access to the St. John Valley,including Presque Isle Bypass and other im-provements .............................................................. $5,000,000

186. ME Repair and improvement of Deer Isle-SedgwickBridge ...................................................................... $3,000,000

187. ME Construction of Calais/St. Stephen Border CrossingProject ...................................................................... $1,000,000

188. ME Replacement of Waldo-Hancock Bridge .... .. ... .. .. ... .. .. $1,000,000

189. ME Improvements and construction of U.S. Route 1Aand State Route 9 in Bangor, Maine .................... $1,500,000

190. ME Planning and construction of the Gorham Bypass,Gorham, Maine ....................................................... $2,500,000

191. ME Access and Traffic Improvements to Route 15 inBrewer, Maine ........................................................ $500,000

192. ME SedgewickDeer Isle Bridge, Sedgewick, Maine .... $3,000,000

193. ME Augusta Memorial Bridge improvements, Augusta,Maine ....................................................................... $1,000,000

194. ME Replacement of Waldo-Hancock and construction ofrelated pedestrian walkways ................................. $1,000,000

195. ME Research development of Cathodic Bridge Protec-tion to extend the life of concrete bridges andMarine structures within varied climates ............ $500,000

196. MI Detroit Riverfront Conservancy, West RiverfrontWalkway, Greenway and Adjacent Land Acquisi-tion, from Riverfront Towers to AmbassadorBridge, Detroit ........................................................ $20,000,000




26/49




197. MI Reconstruct and widen I94 in Kalamazoo ............. $20,000,000

198. MI Construction of a new at-grade crossing and I75interchange to reconnect Milbocker and McCoyRoads and a new overpass to reconnect Van Tyleto South Wisconsin Road in Gaylord .................... $7,000,000

199. MI The Trowbridge Road Extension to Farm Lane,Ingham County, MI, Farm Lane between MountHope Road and Trowbridge Road with under-passes for CN and CSX railroad crossings ........... $6,000,000

200. MI East Riverfront, completion of Detroit RiverfrontEast Walkway, Detroit ........................................... $3,000,000

201. MI Alger County, Repaving a portion of H58 between

Sullivan Creek towards Little Beaver Road ......... $11,000,000

202. MI Jackson Road Boulevard Project, Scio Township .... $5,000,000

203. MI Blue Water Bridge Plaza Expansion, ImproveHighway connections along I94 and I69 PortHuron ...................................................................... $18,000,000

204. MI Midtown Detroit Greenway Loop, Detroit CulturalCenter in Detroit .................................................... $2,000,000

205. MI Pinnacle Aeropark Access Project in Wayne Coun-ty .............................................................................. $2,000,000

206. MI Washington Ave. Streetscape and rail relocation inSaginaw ................................................................... $1,000,000

207. MI U.S. 131 widening from the Manistee River to

north of M113 in Grand Traverse County .......... $3,000,000

208. MI 11 Mile Road ReconstructionBerkley, Hun-tington Woods, Oak Park ....................................... $2,000,000

209. MN Phase III construction of Trunk Highway 61010 .. $8,000,000

210. MN Polk, Pennington, Marshall County 10-Ton Cor-ridor in Northwestern Minnesota ......................... $2,000,000

211. MO Mississippi River Bridge St. Louis, Missouri . .. ... .. .. . $25,000,000

212. MO I29 Paseo Bridge Kansas City, Missouri . .. ... .. .. ... .. . $50,000,000

213. MO Page Ave. Extension, Phase 2, St. Charles County,Missouri ................................................................... $20,000,000

214. MO U.S. 67 Corridor from Butler to St. Francois Coun-ty, Missouri line ...................................................... $15,000,000

215. MO Lewis and Clark Expressway, 39th Street to Hwy24, Jackson County, Missouri ................................ $30,000,000

216. MO Hwy 54 Lake Ozark Bypass, Miller and CamdenCounties, Missouri .................................................. $3,000,000




27/49




217. MO Hwy 13 Warrensburg Bypass, Johnson County,Missouri ................................................................... $10,000,000

218. MO I55 Interchange at Main Street, Cape Girardeau,Missouri ................................................................... $5,000,000

219. MO Rt. 13 in Polk County, Missouri CR 490 to Pine-wood Drive .............................................................. $20,000,000

220. MO Widen Rt. 66 Duquesne Rd. to Rt. 249, JasperCounty, Missouri .................................................... $10,000,000

221. MO Grand Ave. Bridge Replacement, St. Louis City,Missouri ................................................................... $15,000,000

222. MO Hwy 36 Macon to Rt. 24, Marion, Ralls, Monroe,

Shelby and Macon Counties .................................. $7,000,000223. MO Ramsey Creek Bridge, Scott County, Missouri ....... $5,000,000

224. MO Upgrades to MO Route 14 between U.S. 160 andU.S. 65 in Christian County .................................. $6,000,000

225. MO Upgrades to Scott Road (MO Route TT) betweenRollins Road and Brookview Terrace in BooneCounty ..................................................................... $3,500,000

226. MO Construction of riverfront trails in the City of War-saw ........................................................................... $500,000

227. MS Widen State Highway 57 from I10 throughVancleave ................................................................ $32,000,000

228. MS Widening of I55 from Highway 304 in DeSotoCounty to TN State line ......................................... $8,000,000

229. MS Byram-Clinton/Norrell CorridorConnects theNorrell Road Interchange on I20 to the Byram-Clinton Multimodal Corridor on I55 ................... $5,000,000

230. MS South Entrance LoopMississippi State Univer-sity ........................................................................... $5,000,000

231. MS Highway 44 Extension/Pearl River Bridge Project,Lawrence and Marion Counties ............................ $5,000,000

232. MS U.S. Highway 78, New Albany Interchange ............ $5,000,000

233. MS Interstate 69, Unfinished Sections, Mississippi . .. ... $35,000,000

234. MT Zimmerman Trail Project, Billings, Montana .......... $7,000,000

235. MT Taylor Hill Road reconstruction, Secondary 234,

Montana .................................................................. $3,000,000236. MT Develop and construct Shiloh Road reconstruction

project, Billings ....................................................... $10,000,000

237. MT Develop and construct U.S. 93 Kalispell Bypassproject ...................................................................... $30,000,000




28/49




238. MT Develop and construct St. Mary water project roadand bridge infrastructure including: New bridgeand approaches across St. Mary River, stabiliza-tion and improvements to U.S. 89, and road/canal from Siphon Bridge to Spider Lake ............ $8,000,000

239. MT U.S. 2, corridor feasibility study, environmental re-view and construction, which may include con-struction of a 4-lane highway, for roadway sec-tions from Glasgow east to the North DakotaState line, provided that all currently pro-grammed highway improvement projects moveforward .................................................................... $10,000,000

240. MT Develop East Belgrade Interchange and connectingroadways to include environmental review .......... $8,000,000

241. MT Reconstruct Marysville Road consistent with finalenvironmental document, Lewis and ClarkCounty ..................................................................... $5,000,000

242. MT Develop and construct transportation enhance-ments including bicycle/pedestrian trails, land-scaping, footbridges, parks, and river access onand in the vicinity of the Milltown Dam Site,Missoula County and Deer Lodge County ............ $5,000,000

243. MT Develop Billings bypass, Yellowstone County ......... $7,000,000

244. MT Develop Great Falls South Arterial, including envi-ronmental review .................................................... $4,500,000

245. MT Develop and construct Helena I15 corridor con-sistent with final environmental document and

record of decision .................................................... $10,000,000

246. MT Develop and construct U.S. 212 Red Lodge North .. $22,000,000

247. MT Develop and construct Whitefish pedestrian andbicycle trails ............................................................ $3,000,000

248. MT Develop and construct parking lot and transpor-tation enhancements including bicycle/pedes-trian trails and urban plaza, serving the City ofBozeman Public Library ........................................ $1,125,000

249. MT U.S. 2, Swamp Creek East roadway and bridge re-construction, Lincoln County ................................. $6,000,000

250. MT Russell Street reconstruction and bridge expansionover the Clark Fork River, Missoula .................... $6,000,000

251. MT Conrad I15 North Interchange modifications toprovide access east of the current interchange,Pondera County ...................................................... $4,000,000

252. MT Develop and improve access road and structureserving the Port of Montana and Silicon Moun-tain Technology Park ............................................. $4,000,000




29/49




253. NC Construction and expansion of Little Sugar CreekGreenway, Charlotte .............................................. $2,000,000

254. NC Falls of Neuse Road Widening and Improvement,Raleigh .................................................................... $1,000,000

255. NC Transportation Improvements at Piedmont TriadResearch Park, Winston Salem ............................. $1,000,000

256. NC Plan, design, and construct the 10th street Con-nector Project in Greenville ................................... $1,000,000

257. NC Randall Parkway Widening and Improvement,Wilmington .............................................................. $1,000,000

258. NC Construction and improvement of I73, I74, U.S.

220, in Montgomery and Randolph Counties ....... $1,000,000

259. NC U.S. 1 Bypass and improvements around Rocking-ham .......................................................................... $1,000,000

260. NC Design, engineering, and construction of I77/Ca-tawba Avenue Interchange, Cornelius .................. $1,000,000

261. NC Eliminate highway-railway crossings in City ofFayetteville ............................................................. $1,000,000

262. NC Right-of-way acquisition and construction of U.S.74 bypass, Monroe .................................................. $3,000,000

263. NC Transportation improvements for the PiedmontTriad Research Park, Winston-Salem ................... $2,000,000

264. NC Acquire right-of-way and construct a new highway

that will begin at NC 58 and follow east to U.S.301, Wilson .............................................................. $2,000,000

265. NC Transfer of the Williams Street railroad switchingoperation to the Milan Yard switching operationsite, Fayetteville ..................................................... $3,000,000

266. ND Reconstruction of the Bismarck-Mandan LibertyMemorial Bridge over Missouri River ................... $16,000,000

267. ND Develop and construct freight intermodal project inNorth Dakota, including access road construc-tion ........................................................................... $2,000,000

268. ND Rural transportation safety and security researchat the Upper Great Plains Transportation Insti-tute at North Dakota State University ................ $2,000,000

269. ND U.S. 12 Improvements between Bowman andHettinger ................................................................. $3,000,000

270. ND Replace Red River Valley Bridge at Drayton, ND .. $3,000,000

271. ND U.S. 83 Reconstruction from Max to ND 23 South-bound ....................................................................... $500,000




30/49




272. ND U.S. 83 Rehabilitation from Linton to Hazelton ..... $4,500,000

273. ND I29 Vertical Clearance Improvements fromBowesmont to the Canadian Border ..................... $2,000,000

274. ND U.S. 281 Reconstruction from Edgely to the junc-tion of ND 46 .......................................................... $7,000,000

275. NE Construction of the Antelope Valley Transpor-tation Improvement Project in Lincoln ................. $3,800,000

276. NE Design and construction of the Cuming StreetTransportation Improvement Project in Omaha .. $5,700,000

277. NE Design and construction of the I80-Cherry Ave-nue Interchange and East Bypass in Kearney .... $2,000,000

278. NE Construction of the Heartland Expressway be-tween Alliance and Minatare ................................ $2,500,000

279. NE Design, right-of-way and construction of the NorthArterial Road in Columbus .................................... $2,500,000

280. NE Research at the Midwest Roadside Safety Facilityat the University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Ne-braska ...................................................................... $3,500,000

281. NJ PATCO Rolling Stock acquisition and/or renova-tion for use on line between Lindenwold and Lo-cust Street in Philadelphia .................................... $10,000,000

282. NJ Construct new ramps between I295 and Route 42 $10,000,000

283. NJ Route 46 Corridor upgrades ...................................... $500,000

284. NJ Route 18 Reconstruction in downtown New Bruns-wick .......................................................................... $2,500,000

285. NJ Interstate 280 Interchange Improvements, Har-rison ......................................................................... $3,000,000

286. NJ Widening of Rt. 1 and intersection improvementsin South Brunswick ................................................ $2,500,000

287. NJ Route 29 conversion project to a full access free-way ........................................................................... $2,500,000

288. NJ Improvements to River Road in Camden ................. $1,000,000

289. NJ Design and construct Newark Waterfront Pedes-trian and Bicycle Access project ............................ $1,500,000

290. NJ Route 9W operational and safety improvements,including I95 Southbound entrance alterations $1,000,000

291. NJ Expand TRANSCOM Regional ITS System in NJ,NY, and CT ............................................................. $500,000

292. NM I25/U.S. 64 Interchange rehabilitation in Raton ... $2,000,000




31/49




293. NM Reconstruction of NM18 in Lea County .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... $3,000,000

294. NM Reconstruction of U.S. 180 in Grant County ........... $3,000,000

295. NM Reconstruction of U.S. 491 from Tohatchi toShiprock .................................................................. $2,000,000

296. NV Hoover Dam BypassBoulder City Extension ........ $26,500,000

297. NV California Trail Interpretive Center roadside im-provements and access infrastructure .................. $2,000,000

298. NV I15 Widening north from U.S. 95 to Apex Road inClark County .......................................................... $26,500,000

299. NV V and T Railroad Reconstruction Project in Carson

City .......................................................................... $10,000,000

300. NV Carson City Bypass Enhancement Project (PhaseII), Carson City (GROW and NDOT) .................... $2,000,000

301. NV Laughlin-Bullhead City Colorado River Bridge ... .. .. $18,000,000

302. NV Rail Access Corridor Enhancement in Reno ... .. .. ... .. $15,000,000

303. NY Peace Bridge Redevelopment Project, Road Im-provements, and Construction, Buffalo ................ $17,000,000

304. NY Improvements to Moynihan Station .... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... $10,000,000

305. NY Design and Construction of Renaissance SquareIntermodal Facility in Rochester .......................... $4,000,000

306. NY Repair and Restoration of the Outdoor Area on82nd Street and 5th Avenue .................................. $3,000,000

307. NY Improvements to the New York Public Library vi-cinity ........................................................................ $3,000,000

308. NY Construction and Improvements to York Street inAuburn .................................................................... $2,000,000

309. NY Streetscape, Roadway, and Improvements for theCollege of New Rochelle ......................................... $1,000,000

310. NY South Lexington and Post Road Streetscape Ex-pansion in White Plains ......................................... $1,000,000

311. NY Planning and Interim Improvements for the Man-hattan, Bronx, Yonkers Hudson River GreenwayLink ......................................................................... $1,000,000

312. NY DestiNY USA Design, Research, Construction andImprovements ......................................................... $5,000,000

313. NY Restoration of Vehicle Traffic to Main Street inDowntown Buffalo .................................................. $2,000,000




32/49




314. NY Roadway, Streetscape, Pedestrian, and ParkingImprovements to the Buffalo Niagara MedicalCampus in Buffalo .................................................. $6,000,000

315. OH Reconstruction of Cleveland Inner Belt and re-placement of the Central Viaduct Bridge. Cleve-land, OH .................................................................. $85,000,000

316. OH SR 3 intersection/interchange improvements andsignalization, Franklin County, OH (PID 76279) $2,500,000

317. OH SR 81 widening, turn lane addition, and safety im-provements, Allen County, OH (PID 75928) ........ $1,100,000

318. OH U.S. 422 turn lane addition and traffic flow im-provements at SR 88/SR 528, Geauga County

OH (PID 78343) ...................................................... $600,000

319. OH SR 39 add 2-way left turn lane, signalization, andsafety improvements, Tuscarawas County OH(PID 19598) ............................................................. $1,600,000

320. OH U.S. 36 signal relocation and related safety im-provements, Delaware County, OH (PID 76276) $2,000,000

321. OH SR 39 2-way turn lane addition, signalization, andsafety improvements, Holmes County, OH (PID23913) ...................................................................... $600,000

322. OH Evans Avenue/CSX RR Grade Separation Improve-ments, Akron, OH .................................................. $1,600,000

323. OK State of Oklahoma I40 Crosstown Realignment inOklahoma City ........................................................ $110,000,000

324. OK The University of Oklahoma to conduct research inglobal tracking methods for intermodal contain-erized freight ........................................................... $7,000,000

325. OK State of Oklahoma for control of outdoor adver-tising ........................................................................ $1,000,000

326. OK Reconstruction of SH 20 in Owasso, Oklahoma ...... $2,000,000

327. OK Widen Hwy 60 between Ponca City andBartletsville ............................................................. $10,800,000

328. OK Trails in Tulsa, Mingo Creek, NCOGCompleteand extend Mingo trail from 41st to 81st St.,from 11th St. to Mohawk Park .............................. $2,000,000

329. OK Signalization, Complete update of traffic signalswith LED illumination technology ........................ $2,200,000

330. OR To add a southbound lane to a section of I5through Portland, OR between Delta Park andLombard, Portland, Oregon ................................... $2,000,000

331. OR Sunrise Corridor, Clackamas County, Oregon ........ $1,000,000




33/49




332. OR Reroute U.S. 97 at Redmond, Oregon and improve-ments to intersection of U.S. 97 and Oregon 126 $1,400,000

333. OR Construct Barber Street extension, Wilsonville, Or-egon .......................................................................... $600,000

334. OR Construct highway and pedestrian access to Mac-adam Ave. and street improvements as part ofSouth waterfront development, Portland, Oregon $1,800,000

335. OR Sellwood Bridge, Multnomah County, Oregon ........ $2,000,000

336. OR Highway 22-Cascade Highway interchange im-provements, Marion County, Oregon .................... $1,600,000

337. OR I5 Trade Corridor, Portland, Oregon to Van-

couver, Washington Segment ................................ $2,000,000338. OR Highway 101 Improvements, Oregon ....................... $500,000

339. OR I205 Widening, Clackamas County, Oregon .......... $1,400,000

340. OR Phase 1 I205/Highway 213 Interchange Improve-ments, Oregon ......................................................... $1,500,000

341. OR Kuebler Boulevard Improvements, Salem, Oregon $500,000

342. OR To construct sidewalks and improve storm drain-age and gutters for the Citys Safe Walk Plan,Medford, Oregon ..................................................... $2,000,000

343. OR Highway 140 Transportation Improvements, LakeCounty, Oregon ....................................................... $1,700,000

344. PA Warrendale-Bayne Road improvements from I79

to SR 19, in Allegheny County .............................. $2,800,000

345. PA For design, engineering, ROW acquisition, andconstruction of the third phase of the MarshallsCreek Bypass Project in Monroe County, Penn-sylvania ................................................................... $1,000,000

346. PA Construction of Central Susquehanna ValleyThruway .................................................................. $600,000

347. PA Improvements to SR 130 and the College AvenueUnderpass, Greensburg, PA .................................. $500,000

348. PA Mifflin County Industrial Park Access Road ........... $500,000

349. PA Improvements to Section 114 of State Route 150,Centre County, PA ................................................. $2,500,000

350. PA Upgrade to SR 228, Cranberry Township, PA ......... $1,500,000351. PA Purchase of right-of-way, utilities and construction

for Northern Access to Altoona from Interstate99, Blair County, PA .............................................. $600,000

352. PA Reconfiguration of the Rochester Riverfront ramp $500,000




34/49




353. PA Construct the Alle-Kiski Bridge and Connector ...... $1,500,000

354. PA Construct an intermodal center at the Philadel-phia Zoo ................................................................... $1,000,000

355. PA For interpretive signage and trails in Pittsburghurban park land ...................................................... $2,000,000

356. PA Construct an intermodal facility in Derry Town-ship .......................................................................... $1,000,000

357. PA Construction of the Schuylkill Gateway Project ...... $700,000

358. PA Da Vinci Center hydrogen fuel-celled transit vehi-cles ........................................................................... $200,000

359. PA Construct a road along the North Delaware River-front Corridor from Buckius Street toPoquessing Creek ................................................... $1,000,000

360. PA Widen I81 from four to six lanes in the Wilkes-Barre/Scranton corridor ......................................... $1,000,000

361. PA Improvements to the Pleasant Valley and SandyHill Roads intersection with SR 130 in PennTownship ................................................................. $300,000

362. PA Improvements to access roads at the Please TouchMuseum ................................................................... $300,000

363. PA Construct the North Delaware River East CoastGreenway Trail ....................................................... $500,000

364. RI To enhance the infrastructure surrounding and fortransportation improvements relative to theintermodal station at Warwick .............................. $20,000,000

365. RI Improvements to Warren Bridge (Warren) .............. $11,000,000

366. RI Open space acquisition to mitigate growth associ-ated with SR 4 and Interstate 95, by non-profitland conservation agencies through acquisitionof fee or easement, with a match requirement of50% of the total purchase price ............................. $2,000,000

367. RI Ten Mile River Greenway (Pawtucket, E. Provi-dence) ....................................................................... $3,000,000

368. RI Washington Secondary Bicycle Facility/CoventryGreenway/Trestle Trail (Coventry) ....................... $4,000,000

369. RI South County Bike Path (South Kingstown, Narra-gansett) .................................................................... $2,000,000

370. RI New Interchange constructed from I195 to Taun-ton and Warren Avenue in East Providence ........ $1,500,000




35/49




371. RI Jamestown Bridge DemolitionBicycle Access/Trestle Span Demolition/Fishing Pier (N.Kingstown) .............................................................. $11,500,000

372. RI Sakonnet River Bridge Replacement ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... $15,000,000

373. RI Rt. 146 Safety Improvements in North Smithfield $5,000,000

374. SD Construction of 4-lane highway on U.S. 79 betweenMaverick Junction, and the Nebraska border ...... $19,000,000

375. SD Rosebud community streets reconstruction andpaving ...................................................................... $6,000,000

376. SD Aberdeen bike trail extension .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... $1,000,000

377. SD Whether or not otherwise eligible in title 23, con-struct Phase II and III of Phillips to the FallsProject. Notwithstanding any other provision oflaw, with respect to costs for Phase II and III ofthis project paid for from this $40 million, theFederal share of project costs shall be 100 per-cent .......................................................................... $40,000,000

378. SD Rapid City Greenway Pedestrian and bike path ex-pansion .................................................................... $2,000,000

379. SD Brookings bike path .. .. .. ... .. .. ... .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. $100,000

380. SD Sioux Falls Bike PathDunham Park, SkunkCreek, 12th St., and I29 to Sertoma Park .......... $1,170,000

381. SD For bike paths and pedestrian walkways within Yankton, Pierre, Huron, Watertown, and Madi-son. Allocation for such paths will be determinedby the State ............................................................. $2,500,000

382. SD Directed to SD DOT for projects it determines tobe of high priority ................................................... $3,230,000

383. TN North Second Street Corridor Upgrade, Memphis .. $2,000,000

384. TN Upgrade roads for Slack Water Port facility andindustrial park, Lake County, TN ........................ $2,000,000

385. TN Plan and construct Rutherford County visitorscenter/transportation information hub, Ruther-ford County, Tennessee .......................................... $1,000,000

386. TN Warren County Mountain View Industrial Park ac-cess road, Warren County, TN .............................. $1,000,000

387. TN Construction of an Interchange on Highway 64(APD 40) adjacent to I75 Exit 20 in the City ofCleveland, TN for increased safety ....................... $2,000,000

388. TN Sullivan, Washington Counties, Tennessee SR 75widening .................................................................. $1,000,000




36/49




389. TN Sevier County, TN SR 66 widening .......................... $500,000

390. TN Reconstruct U.S. 79 between Milan and McKenzie $5,000,000

391. TN Construct Transportation and Heritage museum,Townsend ................................................................ $500,000

392. UT Widen Highway 92 from Lehi to Highland .............. $3,000,000

393. UT Widen Redwood Road from Bangerter Highway inSalt Lake County through Saratoga Springs inUtah County ........................................................... $2,000,000

394. UT Construction of 200 North Street highway-railgraded crossing separation, Kaysville, Utah ........ $2,000,000

395. UT Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge Access Road Im-provements, Box Elder County, Utah ................... $500,000

396. UT State Street Reconstruction Project10600 Southto 9400 South, Sandy, Utah .................................. $2,500,000

397. UT Geneva Rd./Provo Center Street, Orem 1600 Northto I15 Fwy, Provo-widen from 2 to 4 lanes,Provo ........................................................................ $6,000,000

398. UT Provo, Utah Westside Connector from I15 toProvo Municipal Airport, Provo ............................. $4,000,000

399. UT Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge Access Road Im-provements, Box Elder County .............................. $3,000,000

400. UT Widen Highway 92 from Lehi to Alpine/Highland .. $5,000,000

401. UT Construction of 200 North Street highway-rail

graded crossing separation, Kaysville .................. $7,000,000

402. UT Expand Redhills Parkway from 2 to 5 lanes andimprove alignment within rights-of-way in St.George ...................................................................... $8,000,000

403. UT Construction and Rehabilitation of 13th East inSandy City ............................................................... $7,000,000

404. VA Hampton Roads Third Crossing-Segment 1 ... .. ... .. .. . $37,000,000

405. VA Manage Freight movement and safety improve-ments to I81 .......................................................... $38,000,000

406. VA Construct Old Mill Road extension .. .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. . $3,000,000

407. VA Widen Route 262 in Augusta County ....................... $3,000,000

408. VA Construct Meadowcreek Parkway Interchange,Charlottesville ......................................................... $2,000,000

409. VA Widening I95 between Rt. 123 and Fairfax Coun-ty Parkway .............................................................. $2,000,000

410. VT Improvements to Vermont Small Bridges ... ... .. .. ... .. . $30,000,000




37/49




411. VT Improvements to Vermont interstates .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. $10,000,000

412. VT Vermont Institute of Natural Science turning laneon U.S. Rt. 4 in Woodstock

Opposition Exhibits - CREW v. DOJ: Regarding Documents in Closed Investigation of Rep. Don Young:...

Documents

Transcript of Opposition Exhibits - CREW v. DOJ: Regarding Documents in Closed Investigation of Rep. Don Young:...