Opportunities for Shipping LNG to the Caribbean

66
© Wärtsilä INTERNAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR SHIPPING LNG TO THE CARIBBEAN, VESSEL LNG BUSINESS CASE ECONOMICS John Hatley PE LNG Initiatives ( MBA, MSE) Americas VP Ship Power Wartsila North America, Inc. Cell +1 281 221 4209 [email protected] 03/02/2022 [Presentation name / Author] 1

Transcript of Opportunities for Shipping LNG to the Caribbean

01.05.2023 [Presentation name / Author]1 © Wärtsilä INTERNAL

OPPORTUNITIES FOR SHIPPING LNG TO THE CARIBBEAN, VESSEL LNG BUSINESS CASE ECONOMICS

John Hatley PE LNG Initiatives ( MBA, MSE)

Americas VP Ship PowerWartsila North America, Inc.

Cell +1 281 221 [email protected]

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Keys

Global Energy Policies, market gamesmanship ?

Future Ahead, structural shifts?

As a vessel owner, all I want to knowis the tipping point…

What fuel strategy do I choose to to boost my bottom line?

2 © Wärtsilä

A “Commodity Play” on fuel energy costs seeking competitive advantage for market share.

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Agenda

3 © Wärtsilä

What ? Fuel Price vs. CostEnergy

Why & How ? No. Am ECA & EmissionsOwner ChoicesAbatement: SCR, Scrubber, LNG

Business Case Cargo, Investor, Banker Views20K m3 LNG CarrierInvestment Returns

Oil Price Shock ! Business Case: Robust or Fragile?Stress Test

Conclusions Business Case Appendix

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Agenda

4 © Wärtsilä

What ? Fuel Price vs. CostEnergy

Why & How ? No. Am ECA & EmissionsOwner ChoicesAbatement: SCR, Scrubber, LNG

Business Case Cargo, Investor, Banker Views20K m3 LNG CarrierInvestment Returns

Oil Price Shock ! Business Case: Robust or Fragile?Stress Test

Conclusions Business Case Appendix

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Quiz…. Fuel Price ?

a) HFO 290.83 $ / ton ….

b) MDO 314.68 $ / ton .…

c) LNG 363.01 $ / ton ….

5 © Wärtsilä

Which is the lowest price ?

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

The Price Paid for what it Cost

6 © Wärtsilä

: the amount of money that you pay for something

: the price of something : the amount of money that is needed to pay for or buy something

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Quiz… Fuel Answer Key

a) HFO 290.83 $ / ton ….

b) MDO 314.68 $ / ton .…

c) LNG 363.01 $ / ton ….

7 © Wärtsilä

Which is the lowest price ?

Key concept… purchase energy, not tons or gallons, which is the lowest cost per unit of energy?

7.77 $ / million BTU

7.77 $ / million BTU

7.77 $ / million BTU

Reference Common Values that will vary…HFO 37,430 BTU/kg MDO 40,500 BTU/kg LNG 46,720 BTU/kg density 980 kg/ m3 850 kg/ m3 430 kg/ m3

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Agenda

8 © Wärtsilä

What ? Fuel Price vs. CostEnergy

Why & How ? No. Am ECA & EmissionsOwner ChoicesAbatement: SCR, Scrubber, LNG

Business Case Cargo, Investor, Banker Views20K m3 LNG CarrierInvestment Returns

Oil Price Shock ! Business Case: Robust or Fragile?Stress Test

Conclusions Business Case Appendix

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Emission Control Areas

9 © Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

2015 ECA 0.1% Sulfur

10 © Wärtsilä

Works with high S HFO Low total lifecycle cost Use everywhere

Scrubber targets SOx, Selective Catalytic Reducer targets NOx, LNG targets CO2, NOx, PM, SOx.

Source: 2015 Exhaust Gas Cleaning Scrubbers Dec 2015 011415.pptx

How clean is Natural Gas compared to Diesel ?

DF Natural Gas Engine

DieselEngine

0

20

40

60

80

100

Emissionvalues [%]

CO2

NOx

SOx

Particulates

-25%

-85%

-99%

-99%

Gas = ULTRA CLEAN

LNG provides significant emission reductions compared to traditional diesel engines

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

No. Am. ECA Fuel Sulfur Limit

12 Wärtsilä

Source:http://www.dnvusa.com/industry/maritime/publicationsanddownloads/publications/newsletters/technical_regulatory/2012/north_american_emission_control_area.asp

Fuel Sulfur 0.10 % limit commences 1 January 2015

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

North America ECA SOx & NOx

13 © Wärtsilä

Fuel Sulfur2012… 1% Limit2015… 0.1% Limit

IMO Category 3 2016… NOx Tier III

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Decision Tree… New Build Vessel

14 © Wärtsilä

New Build

Diesel

HFO

LNG

Scrubber … Fuel Sulfur Compliance

LNG Compliance

ECA January 2016 multiple emission requirements; both fuel sulfur limits (2015) and engine emissions IMO Tier 3 requirements in effect.

New tier 3 IMO engine + after-treatment SCR

0.1% Sulfur… Fuel Compliance

New tier 3 IMO engine + after-treatment SCR + Scrubber

New tier 3 IMO engine + LNG cryogenics

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

New Build Attributes

15 © Wärtsilä Source: Wartsila Moss White Paper: Exhaust Gas Cleaning: How to Choose the Correct Scrubber, Jennifer Ahlback, 2014.

Excess baggage as systems require host support; chemicals, tanks, waste stream sludge, piping/pumps, controls/automation, soot blowers…

Diesel + SCR

LNG

HFO + SCR + Scrubber

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Wartsila NOx Reducer System

16 © Wärtsilä

Soot Blower

Air

Pump

Mixing Duct

Dosing Unit

NOR Reactor

Controls

Urea Tank

CompressedAir

Urea Mixing & Injection

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

LNGPac System

17 © Wärtsilä

Source: http://www.wartsila.com/media/news/26-08-2014-wartsila-launches-new-technical-solution-for-fuel-gas-handling

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL18 © Wärtsilä

Exhaust Gas Fan

Alkali Feed Module

Bleed-Off Treatment

Process Tank

Alkali Storage Tank

CW Pump

Heat Exchgr

Scrubbing Water Pump

Exhaust Gas Analyzer

Sludge Tank

Water Measurement

Water Measurement

De- Plume Unit

Holding Tank

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

2015 ECA + 2016 NOx Refit Existing Vessel Choices

1. Consume compliant Low Sulfur Distillate… champagne fuel + Selective Catalytic Reduction for NOx

2. Switch to LNG fuel: safe, clean, abundant, affordable, & available natural gas LNGReduction: CO2, NOx, SOx, PM

3. HFO Alternative Compliance… install scrubber for Sox + Selective Catalytic Reduction for NOx

4. Abort the Port

1 May 2023

ECA & EPA force timely choices existing retrofit vessels

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Agenda

20 © Wärtsilä

What ? Fuel Price vs. CostEnergy

Why & How ? No. Am ECA & EmissionsOwner ChoicesAbatement: SCR, Scrubber, LNG

Business Case Cargo, Investor, Banker Views20K m3 LNG CarrierInvestment Returns

Oil Price Shock ! Business Case: Robust or Fragile?Stress Test

Conclusions Business Case Appendix

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Cautionary Remarks

• Each investment case requires careful analysis, inclusion, and weighing a broad variety of issues stemming from technical, financial, operational, regulatory, and other areas.

• The purpose of this exercise is to illustrate a Business Case example and how a few of many key considerations may be transcribed into financial modeling as an aide to decision making.

• Readers are advised that neither the Author nor Wartsila nor it’s subsidiaries are responsible for any errors, omissions, or updates to this information contained herein or assumptions or derivations whatsoever.

21 © Wärtsilä

This presentation is no substitute for your good and responsible decision making. Please utilize prudence and caution when making investment decisions along with securing the advice and guidance of professionals.

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

4 Viewpoints

22 © Wärtsilä

SHIP OWNER

BANKER

PUBLIC

Transport safely at

optimal cost reliably

At fair return capturing

risks

Are risks understood

& I’m repaid !

Ultimate Environment

Safety

CARGO OWNER

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

4 Key Metrics

23 © Wärtsilä

SHIP OWNER

BANKER

PUBLIC

All In Charter

Freight rate $ / ton

Return on Investment:

ROIC, EBITDA, cash flows

EBIT, Times Burden Cover,

cash flows

Ultimate Environment

Safety

CARGO OWNER

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

LNG Demand

1 May 202324 © Wärtsilä

Mostly small markets… total generating capacity exceeds 10 Giga Watts… = LNG ~17.2 mtpa… ~40 mm m3

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Where’s the LNG fuel need?

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration; ‘Net electricity consumption 2010’

Concentrated electrical power demand… top 3 countries consume more than half the region’s 10 Giga Watts.

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

The Route: Corpus Christi - Jamaica

26 © Wärtsilä

15% “ECA” Bound route, 2634 nm round trip, 0.5 days load/unload per port, 341 operating days per year

Source: http://www.sea-distances.org/

549 mW Utility Power: Demand 710K tons LNG @ 100%

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Business Case Vessel

27 © Wärtsilä

2 vessels on route transport 600K tons LNG per year, satisfy 549 mW Utility Power @ 92% load ( maxima 100% demand 710k tons LNG /yr. )

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Business Case Vessel

US Corporation, Foreign Flag

20,000 m3 LNG Carrier

New build

Design Speed 15.0 knots with margin

Installed power 7,980 HP ( 5,950 kW )

Major Class Society

28 © Wärtsilä

Speed provides 38 annual round trips, … competitive vessel size transport

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Recall ?

29 © Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Then… 5 August 2014

30 Wärtsilä

LS180 1% 636 $/mt… LSMGO 0.1% 971 $/mt… LNG 500 $/mt

Source: http://www.bunkerworld.com/prices/port/us/hou/

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Cargo Owner Transport safely at optimal cost reliably

31 © Wärtsilä

Cargo owner with LNG captures significant emissions reductions supporting green goals.

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Ship Owner A fair return capturing risks

32 © Wärtsilä

Compelling fuel payback for vessels running on LNG fuel; an initial screening tool … not a good investment metric.

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

ROCE Investment Criteria

33 © Wärtsilä

ROCE: reflects the company fundamental earning power.

Source: Robert Higgens, Analysis for Financial Management, 10 th Edition, pg 53-55.

• Return on Capital Employed (Return on Invested Capital, ROIC ) reflects the company fundamental earning power as it removes the distorting effects of leverage inherent with Return on Equity (ROE).

Shipping companies often target 12% ROCE

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Ship Owner A fair return capturing risks

34 © Wärtsilä

Investor finds LNG Competitive Advantage for return on capital… LNG hurdle rate is highest & yet preserves cargo owner savings in emission reduction.

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL 35 © Wärtsilä

Warren Buffett… World Famous InvestorEBITDA as equivalent to earnings for a company is tantamount to the Egyptian Pyramids: forever state of the art…with never a need to be replaced, improved or refurbished…

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

The Pyramids

• Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation Amortization

EBITDA may overstate available cash flow… when used carefully and fully understood it may indicate what is available to pay bank debt and shareholders.

Often viewed as one of many economic indicators of company performance by financiers/investors/bankers.

Is often utilized when company has significant fixed assets.

36 © Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL 37 © Wärtsilä

LNG fuel has strongest EBITDA… + $1.7 Million over HFO+ Scrubber and + $1.9 Million atop MDO.

Years

EBITDA

MDO Fuel

HFO + Scrubber

LNG Fuel

Ship Owner A fair return capturing risks

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Banker Are risks understood & I’m repaid !

38 © Wärtsilä

Banker finds debt cover is weakest on MDO fuel, favorably stronger on alternatives, LNG is strongest.

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

The Pyramids

• Earnings Before Interest Taxes

EBIT = Revenue minus expenses, excluding tax & interest

EBIT may conservatively understate available cash flow… when used carefully and fully understood it may indicate what is available to pay bank debt and shareholders.

Often viewed as one of many economic indicators of company performance by financiers/investors/bankers.

EBIT nulls the effects of different capital structures and tax rates. EBIT was the precursor to EBITDA.

39 © Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL 40 © Wärtsilä

Years

EBIT

Banker Are risks understood & I’m repaid !

LNG has strongest EBIT… Depreciation 10 Year MACRS ½ Year Convention… Dry docking years 5,10,15,20

LNG Fuel

HFO + Scrubber

MDO Fuel

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Agenda

41 © Wärtsilä

What ? Fuel Price vs. CostEnergy

Why & How ? No. Am ECA & EmissionsOwner ChoicesAbatement: SCR, Scrubber, LNG

Business Case Cargo, Investor, Banker Views20K m3 LNG CarrierInvestment Returns

Oil Price Shock ! Business Case: Robust or Fragile?Stress Test

Conclusions Business Case Appendix

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

US #1 Shale Resources

42 © Wärtsilä

1,161 tcf gas & 120 billion barrels oil

Development rapid with technology advances in horizontal drilling, fracking, and computer seismic abilities.

In 5 years US became world’s largest producer of gas

Strong infrastructure & know how

Source:http://www.eia.gov/conference/2013/pdf/presentations/kuuskraa.pdf

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Shale Gas

43 © Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Shale Oil

44 © Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

28 November 2014

45 © Wärtsilä

Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-opec-meeting-idUSKCN0JA0O320141128

Key OPEC Vienna meeting sets stage for market share battle. Brent begins steep fall.

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

5 January 2015

46 © Wärtsilä

Source: http://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanvardi/2015/01/05/saudi-arabias-750-billion-bet-drives-brent-oil-below-54/

Exert Discipline in the Marketplace amongst OPEC and Non OPEC countries... Key focus on market share… oil prices plunging.

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Discipline Target US or Russia ?

47 © Wärtsilä

Russia suffering double whammy:

Oil rich Ukraine and Black Sea burdened by politics under imposed sanctions as oil takes severe price slide…Ruble plunges down against USD

Source: http://online.wsj.com/articles/ruble-hits-new-low-as-oil-prices-drop-1417441184

Source: http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/11/10/an-oil-price-cold-war-with-saudi-arabia-not-so-fast-experts-say

Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/ruble-plunging-again-2014-12p://online.wsj.com/articles/ruble-hits-new-low-as-oil-prices-drop-1417441184

1 December 2014

December 31, 2014

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/citi-saudi-arabia-wont-win-this-oil-standoff-2014-11 48 © Wärtsilä

Profits negative… Severe Pain

Profits squeezed…Manageable Pain

45 $/BBL

Key Oil Production Cost

40$/BBL

Total Liquids Production

Brent Breakeven Price

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

2014 Production

49 © Wärtsilä

US vaults to 1st in production oil and other liquids

OPEC

OPEC

OPEC

OPEC

OPEC

OPEC

OPEC

OPEC

Source: ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_oil_production

http://www.eia.gov/beta/international/rankings/#?prodact=53-1&cy=2014

Saudi Arabia11.6 m BBL/day

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Government Breakeven Budgets

50 © Wärtsilä

Severe shortfalls @ prices under 100$/BBL, present oil glut & soft prices challenge sustainability beyond short run

Source: https://alfinnextlevel.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/oil_breakeven_deutsche_bank_oct_14.png40 $/BBL

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Brent Crude Oil Prices

51 © Wärtsilä

Source: http://www.nasdaq.com/markets/crude-oil-brent.aspx?timeframe=1y

THEN

NOW

Oil severe price 70% price drop past 18 months as abundant supplies face weak demand from China and stagnant EU.

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

What’s the impact of the steep fall in oil prices !

Is competitive advantage of LNG robust or fragile ?

52 © Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Recent … 28 January 2016

53 © Wärtsilä

Port Houston Delivered Price

LS380 1% Sulfur 139 $ / ton

LSMGO 0.1% Sulfur 333 $ / ton

Source: http://www.kpibridgeoil.com/

LS180 1% 139 $/mt… LSMGO 0.1% 333 $/mt…

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

LNG Price 08 February 2016

Fixed Liquefaction Charge 4.60 CAD $/ GJVariable Sumas Gas Basis + 3.00 CAD $/ GJTotal FOB LNG Price 7.60 CAD $/ GJ

conversion to million BTU x 1.05435 LNG FOB price 8.02 CAD $/ mm BTU

exchange rate x 0.72 USD $ / CAD $ Price LNG FOB 5.77 US $ / mm BTU

54 © Wärtsilä

Allow 2.00 US $/mmBTU transport = 7.77 or LNG 363 $/mt

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Owner A fair return capturing risks of oil fall 28 Jan 2016

55 © Wärtsilä

LNG emissions savings remains for shipper but returns on LNG moderate climb for investor amidst oil glut steep price dive.

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Fuel Stress Test: 15% ECA

THEN 5 August 2014

14.17% @ LNG 500 $/mt 12.80% @ MDO 971 $/mt 12.44% @ HFO 636 $/mt

56 © Wärtsilä

Deviation

ROCE

NOW 28 January 2016

15.22% @ LNG 363 $/mt 17.87% @ MDO 333 $/mt17.23% @ HFO 139 $/mt

LNG robust despite steep crude drop; today choose MDO for best ROCE, but sustainable? Volatility returns MDO & HFO similar, least LNG but also provides shipper lowest emissions. Small % voyage ECA; MDO inside ECA & HFO outside superior.

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Agenda

57 © Wärtsilä

What ? Fuel Price vs. CostEnergy

Why & How ? No. Am ECA & EmissionsOwner ChoicesSCR, Scrubber, LNG Abatement

Business Case Cargo, Investor, Banker Views20K m3 LNG CarrierInvestment Returns

Oil Price Shock ! Business Case: Robust or Fragile?Stress Test

Conclusions Business Case Appendix

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Keys

Global Energy Policies, market gamesmanship ?

Future Ahead, structural shifts?

As a vessel owner, all I want to knowis the tipping point…

What fuel strategy do I choose to to boost my bottom line?

58 © Wärtsilä

A “Commodity Play” on fuel energy costs seeking competitive advantage for market share.

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

BUSINESS CASE DETAILSAPPENDIX

59 Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Financials

60 Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Key Values

61 Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Key Values

62 Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

Fuel Attributes

63 © Wärtsilä

Utilize fuels specific for regional case... As fuels widely vary, the historic dollars per ton or gallon is challenging to use as differing fuels host widely varying energy content, density, value... These values shown are generally representative.

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

EBITDA

64 © Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä INTERNAL

EBIT

65 © Wärtsilä