2014 Conference Report Funding in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities
Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
-
Upload
amincool22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
3
Transcript of Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
1/72
1
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The first section of the report contains overview of road sector, various
policies frameworks concerned with the road project this helps in
understanding briefly the overall road scenario in India.
The second section of the project emphasizes on the investment
opportunities in the road sector, Public Private Partnership (PPP), types of
PPP projects.
The third section highlights the most important factors for a road project,
traffic study & also funding mechanism for infrastructure project (road),
issues & concerns for the lender or the developer.
The last section highlights the various risks involved in funding road
projects & finally the recommendation & conclusion to the project.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
2/72
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
3/72
3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Given the objectives of the project the following research methodology was adopted:
Interaction with the project guide and key officials in the project appraisaldepartment of IDBI Bank
Articles from infrastructure magazines
Library research
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
4/72
4
3. OVERVIEW OF ROAD SECTOR:
An efficient transport system is not only a pre-requisite for sustained economic development
but also plays a significant role in promoting national integration, which is particularly
important in a large country like India. The transport system also plays an important role of
promoting the development of the backward regions and integrating them with the
mainstream economy by opening them to trade and investment.
The most distinct part of Indias physical infrastructure development in recent years is the
development of road network across the countries; per sq. km. of surface area in India is now
endowed with one km of roadways. India has one of the largest road networks in the world
aggregating to 3.34million km.
The countrys road network can be divided in to following broad categories:
Expressways National Highways (NH) State Highways (SH) Major District Roads (MDR) Other District Roads (ODR) Village Roads. (VR)
Road Network:
Total road network 3.34 million km
National highways 57,700 km
State highways 1,40,000 km
Other roads
(MDR, ODR, VR, etc) 29,00,000 km
Urban roads 2,00,000 km
Administratively roads are divided into:
National highways (NH): intended to facilitate medium and long haul intercitypassenger and freight traffic across the country.
These are main highways running through the length and breadth of the country
connecting major ports, state capitals, large industrial and tourist centres, etc. National
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
5/72
5
Highways in India are designated as NH followed by the highway number. The
National Highways represent only 2% of the total networklength, and they handle
about 40% of the total road traffic. The National Highways are further classified
based on the width of carriageway of the Highway. Generally, in case of a single lane,
the lane width is of 3.75 meters, while in case of multi-lane National Highways, each
of the lanes has a width of 3.5 meters.
State highways (SH): supposed to carry the traffic along major centres within thestate. The State Highways provide linkages with the National Highways, district
headquarters, important towns, tourist centres and minor ports and carry the traffic
along major centres within the state. These arterial routes provide connectivity to
important towns and cities within the state with National Highways or State Highways
of the neighbouring states. Their total length is about 140,000 km. The Ministry of
State for Surface Transport in India administers the national highway system, and
state highways and other state roads are maintained by state public works
departments. The central and state governments share responsibilities for road
building and maintaining Indian roads
Major district roads (MDR): provide the secondary function of linkages betweenthe main roads and the rural roads. These are important roads within a district
connecting areas of production with markets and connecting these with each other or
with the State Highways & National Highways. It also connects TALUKA
headquarters and rural areas to District headquarters within the state.
Other district roads (ODR) and Village roads (VR): serve to connect villages andconnect accessibility to meet social needs as also the means to transport agriculture
produce from village to nearby market. The rural roads in India form a substantial
portion of the Indian road network.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lengthhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talukahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talukahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talukahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Length -
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
6/72
6
CURRENT INITIATIVES BY GOI FOR ROAD PROJECTS
In recent times the Government of India has laid great emphasis on the development of
adequate road network in India. A vision of expressways connecting far corners of India has
been projected. There is a need to upgrade the road system in India by widening and
strengthening the existing highways, reconstruction and widening of bridges and provisions
of user-friendly improvements. It is obvious that this vital infrastructure requirement would
have to be developed with the private sector's participation.
The government has announced a series of far-reaching measures to promote investment in
roads. These measures include industry status to road sector, exemption from import duty on
identified high quality construction plant and equipment, automatic approval for foreign
equity up to 74 per cent andforeign commercial borrowing to the extent of 30 per cent of the
project cost has been permitted. There is no restriction on the maximum equity holding by a
foreign company in a joint venture to be set up in India. The pre-qualification criteria,
however, requires experience of the joint venture partners in similar projects.
India has finalized Investment Promotion and Protection Agreements (IPPAs) with over 30
countries. Therefore, setting up of a joint venture or a 100% foreign owned subsidiary
qualifies as an investment under the IPPAs, which offer free transferability, re-patriatibility of
funds and provide for an elaborate dispute settlement mechanism and protection against
expropriation.Moreover, India enjoys Article 8 status of the IMF under which no restrictions
are imposed on current account transactions.All payments under construction contracts are
current account transactions and are accordingly freely permitted.
Construction contracts when conferred by law or under contract, as business concessions
would be defined as investments within the meaning of IPPAs. Such business concessions
would enjoy all protection and benefits extended to investment under IPPAs. The legal
framework for joint ventures is well defined and has the necessary protection against
repatriation and expropriation. For the joint ventures to succeed, it is now necessary that the
international companies entering into JV agreements with Indian companies ensure active
participation in the project implementation rather than providing only project management
services at a fee.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
7/72
7
In the case of an enterprise (the enterprise owned by a company registered in India or by a
consortium of such companies) carrying on the business of developing, maintaining and
operating any infrastructure facility, hundred per cent of the profits and gains derived from
such business for the initial 5 assessment years and thereafter, thirty per cent of such profits
and gains are exempt from corporate Tax. The tax concession may be availed of by the
enterprises in any ten consecutive assessment years beginning with the first assessment year
from which the enterprise begins operation and maintenance facility.
As an Incentive to financial Institution to provide finance for the infrastructure projects,
deduction up to 40 per cent of their income derived from financing of these investments is
allowed provided the amount is kept in a special reserve.
There is an exemption for infrastructure funds from income tax on the incomes from Income
Tax dividend, interest on long-term capital gains of such funds or companies from
investments in the form of shares or long-term finance in any enterprises setup to develop,
maintain and operate an infrastructure facility. Subscription to equity shares or debentures
issued by a public company formed and registered in India and the issue is wholly and
exclusively for the purpose of developing, maintaining and operating an infrastructure
facility, will be eligible for deductions under Section 88 of the income Tax Act, 1961, which
permits deduction equal to 20 per cent of the amount subscribed, from the amount of tax
payable by the subscriber.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
8/72
8
NHDP IMPLEMENTATION:
In 2000, the central government initiated the National Highway Development Program
(NHDP), in an effort to improve highway infrastructure. The national highway network
accounts for 30% of the total highway network and only 2% of the countrys total road
length. However, these national highways account for 45% of total traffic. The government
has therefore made it a priority to invest in this segment. While the NHDP initially targeted
about 13,000 km of arterial highway network, the government has extended the plan to
include all 65,000 kms of national highways. Total cost of this program is likely to be
Rs 1, 720 billion (US$38 billion) and is scheduled for completion in 2012.
Awarding under the NHDP by national highways authority of India (NHAI) accelerated in
the second half of 2009-10 due to the resolution of the policy issues that brought clarity
towards bidding and implementation of national highway projects. Against CRISIL
researchs estimates of 3400 km of projects to be awarded in 2009-10, close to 3213 km were
awarded by NHAI.
From April-May 2010, around 800 km have already been awarded, with a further 6700 km
expected to be awarded in 2010-11 & will get completed by 2014-15, CRISIL research
expects the construction of 25,714 km of roads at an estimated cost of Rs.2, 706 billion, on
the back of the governments continuing focus on implementing NHDP.
In 2008-09, ambiguity in the policy framework and the economic slowdown had led to a lull
in implementation and awarding of road projects under NHDP. Delays in awarding projects
continued in the first of 2009-10 due to frequent changes in the Model Concession
Agreement (MCA) and bidding policy, and the time taken in implementing these policies.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
9/72
9
Expected phase-wise progress of NHDP:
Phase I and II: Majority of work completed.Phase I mainly comprises of golden quadrilateral (GQ), port connectivity and other
stretches. Phases II comprises north-south and east-west corridors (NSEW). Both
phases have mainly been executed on cash contracts. In phase I only 3 percent of the
total remains to be completed. In phase II, out of the total length of 7,300 km, the
balance 500 km is expected to be awarded by 2012-13, over the next 5 years (2010-11
to 2014-15), and an investment of Rs. 194 billion is expected in both phases.
Phase III: Maximum awarding over the next few years.Phase III involves four laning of two laned roads that mainly connect state capitals
and important places to the GQ and other key corridors. Work on around 9,098 km,
out of the total length of 12,109 km, is likely to be completed between 2010-11 and
2014-15 at an estimated cost of around Rs.1041 billion, with bulk of the remaining
portions expected to be completed by 2016-17. The government plans to implement
most of the projects under this phase through the BOT-Toll model, however, projects
which are not attractive for private players, the government will award these under
BOT. Annuity, with the least attractive stretches awarded under cash contracts.
In 2010-11, around 80 per cent of the projects are awarded on BOT annuity since
NHAI will look to award the more attractive stretches in the initial years. Hence,
going forward, the proportion of projects awarded on BOT-Toll will reduce.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
10/72
10
Phase III: proportion of awarding of projects under different models
Source: CRISIL Research.
Phase IV: Awarding gain transaction.Phase IV involves improvement of national highways to two lanes with paved
shoulders. The total length of this phase is 20,000 km. Around 9,400 km of the
stretches have been identified by the NHAI, out of which CRISIL Research expects
5332 km to be completed between 2010-11 and 2014-15 at an estimated cost of
around Rs.194 billion. Several stretches in this phase would be awarded on BOT
Annuity and cash contracts, as the traffic volumes on these stretches will not be
attractive for the BOT-Toll model.
Phase V: Awarding on fast track.This phase involves six laning of existing four lane national highways. The total
length of this phase is 6,500 km, out of which around 4,974 km is expected to be
constructed during 2010-11 and 2014-15 at an estimated cost of around Rs.638
billion, with most of the remaining stretches likely to be completed in 2016-17. The
government aims to implement all projects under this phase on BOT-Toll basis, as
traffic on these stretches is attractive for private players. Moreover, the concessionaire
is allowed to collect toll on the existing four-laned highway from the date of financial
closure of the project, which results in cash inflows even before commencement of
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13P 2013-14P 2014-15P
BOT-Toll
BOT-Annuity
Cash
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
11/72
11
construction. In 2010-11 they expect most of the projects in this phase to be awarded
under the BOT-Toll model.
Phase V: Proportion of awarding of projects under different models.
Source: CRISIL Research
Phase VI: Progress expected to be lack lustre.This phase includes ring roads, flyovers and bypass on selected stretches of national
highways. Only two stretches have been identified till date. Going forward, CRISIL
Research does not expect much progress in this phase, with around 111 km to be
constructed between 2010-11 and 2014-15 at a cost around Rs.13 billion.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13P 2013-14P 2014-15P
BOT-Toll
BOT-Annuity
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
12/72
12
Mega projects: Nine mega projects identified.
Mega projects and the eastern peripheral expressway were announced by the government in
2009-10. Nine mega projects have been identified with the length of each project varyingfrom 390 km to 700 km. Out of the projects; feasibility study for the KISHANGARH-
UDAIPUR-AHMEDABAD stretch is in underway. CRISIL Research estimates an
investment of Rs.423 billion and 2930 km of stretches to be completed over the next 5 years
(2010-11 to 2014-15).
Expressways: New programme outlined:
The government has outlined a new expressway programme, which plans to build 18,637 km
of Greenfield national expressways by 2022. The programme will be implemented in three
phases with four-laned and six-laned expressways. Stretches in these phases have been
identified based on the traffic density on nearby stretches, economic activity in the
surrounding areas and financial viability. However, issues like MCA, bidding process, land
acquisition, setting up of an expressway authority and competing roads are still addressed.
This would delay implementation of the programme. However, some traction is expectedfrom 2012-13, with around 1,000 km expected to be completed over the next 5 years at an
estimated cost of Rs. 203 billion.
Expressway program:
Expressways Length
(Km)
Phase I 3530
Phase II 4310
Phase III 5571
Remaining stretches 5226
Total 18637
Source: CRISIL Research
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
13/72
13
NEW PROJECTS ON THE ANVIL:
Road development provides many opportunities at both the central and state level. The
twelfth five year plan targets nearly $150 billion of investment in roads, almost double the
projected expenditure of $75 billion in the eleventh five year plan.
The national highway development program (NHDP) has been the primary driving force for
road construction. As of November 2010, the national highways authority of India (NHAI)
had completed four-laning 13,523 km of highways, while work on 9,000 km of highways is
under implementation. NHAI is yet to award projects to build another 25,963 km of
highways.
Within the NHDP, the maximum potential for construction activity lies in phases IV, V and
VI of the NHDP. Phase III onwards, more than 80 per cent of the projects under the NHDP
have been bid out on a build-operate-transfer (BOT) basis. It is pertinent to note that the road
ministry is also planning to develop nine mega highway projects, which if implemented,
would present significant opportunities. Of these, the 558 km KISHANGARH-UDAIPUR-
AHMEDABAD stretch has been awarded with the feasibility study for the 436 km
ICHHAPURAM-SRIKAKULAM-VISHAKHAPATNAM-ANKAPALLI-RAJAHMUNDRY
section of national highway (NH-5) in Andhra Pradesh has also been completed.
At the state level, much of the engagement is with government agencies like public works
departments, and state road development corporations. State projects are generally funded
through budgetary resources, multilateral aid and Public-Private Partnership (PPP).
Some new projects were approved in 2010 under multilateral aid programs. The World Bank
approved a loan worth of Rs 21 billion for phase II of the Punjab state road sector project,
involving up gradation of 958 km of roads. Later, a $500 million loan was approved for the
development of over 1800 km of state highways in Gujarat.
The Asian development bank approved the Madhya Pradesh state roads sector project phase
II, Chhattisgarh state road development project, Bihar state highways project and the
Karnataka state highway improvement project in 2010. The Madhya-Pradesh state roads
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
14/72
14
sector project phase III is proposed for approval in 2011. On the PPP side, accordingly to the
planning commission, a total of 135 state highway projects have either been completed or are
under implementation. In addition, 41 projects are in the bid process while 38 are in the
pipeline for 2011-12.
The rural road development works under the PRADHAN MANTRI GRAMEEN SADAK
YOJNA (PMGSY) are being primarily taken up on an EPC basis. As of May 2010, over
104,000 road works had been sanctioned, at a cost of Rs 1,145.29 billion. The PMGSY is
constructing about 165 km of roads every day.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
15/72
15
PRADHAN MANTRI GRAMEEN SADAK YOJNA:
Rural roads play a vital role in the socio-economic up-liftment of the rural community. Of the
total 3.3 million km road network, rural roads account for around 2.7 million km(80 percent). Despite various efforts at the state and central levels, about 40 per cent of
Indias villages still do not have access to all-whether roads and remain cut-off during the
monsoon.
PMGSY, a sub program under Bharat Nirman, has been launched to construct all-whether
access to unconnected habitations. PMGSY estimates that 172,000 habitations would be
provided new connectivity with a road length of 3, 65,279 km. It is also proposed to upgrade
3, 68,000 km of existing routes for ensuring farm-to-market connectivity.
PMGSY is a 100 per cent centrally sponsored scheme, where in the existing sources of
funding are budgetary sources, Central Road Fund (CRF) on High Speed Diesel (HSD),
market committee fees, and loan assistance from National Bank for Agriculture & Rural
Development (NABARD), World Bank and Asian Development Bank. It is implemented
through cash contracts.
In the union budget 2010-11, around Rs 480 billion have been allocated for up gradation of
rural infrastructure under Bharat Nirman, whereas Rs 40 billion were allocated for rural roads
in the interim budget 2009-10, routed through a separate window created under the Rural
Infrastructure Development Fund (RIDF). This would provide the necessary funds for up
gradation and development of rural roads planned under Bharat Nirman.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
16/72
16
Rural roadsyear wise breakup of the length constructed.
Source: National Rural Roads Development Agency
22,891
30,710
41,231
52,405
36,273
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Till dec
2009
Length Constructed
length constructed
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
17/72
17
Rural roadsyear wise breakup of investment
Source: National Rural Roads Development Agency
Over the last 4 years (2005-2006 to 2008-09), there has been a significant growth in
construction of rural roads under the PMGSY, both in volume and value terms. In value
terms, there has been 55 per cent compounded annual growth, while in volume terms the
growth has been 32 per cent compounded annually. As on December 2009, Rs 130 billion has
been incurred on construction of rural roads under PMGSY.
41
73
106
152
130
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Till dec
2009
Investment
investment
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
18/72
18
4. INSTITUTIONAL, LEGAL AND POLICY FRAME WORK:Having given an overview of the road sector, let us understand the contractual structure that
exists between various parties, which is the core of any road project today and probably for
the entire NHDP. Further, in the section, we will briefly understand the institutional, legal
and policy framework before we go ahead with the discussion on important areas and address
various issues one-by-one.
CONTRACTUAL FRAME WORK OF A ROAD PROJECT:
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: The process begins with, the granting authority i.e. NHAI in
this case, carrying out an extensive project development work including engineering studies,
assessment of the feasibility and preparation of the detailed project report.
1. INVITING REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION OF BIDS: Thereafter, a notice isfloated inviting request for qualification from interested contractors and project
developers whereby the interested parties are required to furnish details regarding
their technical expertise and financial capabilities .The private parties who satisfy the
required criteria are qualified to submit the financial bids. The bidding can be for a
positive or a negative grant. A positive grant is where the granting authority i.e. NHAI
is expected to pay the successful bidder according to the contractual agreement
(concession agreement).In a negative grant, the private party is expected to pay the
NHAI.
2. AWARDING THE CONTRACT: The contract is awarded to the private partybased on the lowest (for positive grant) or highest (for negative grant) bid. The mode
of contract may vary, viz, Cash Contract, BOT (Toll), BOT (Annuity), etc., which are
explained in the following chapters.
3. CONCESSION AGREEMENT: The successful bidder thus becomes theconcessionaire (Project sponsors), who signs the concession agreement with NHAI
and sets up a project company, which is a special purpose vehicle (SPV), for
implementation and operation of the project. It becomes obligation of the projectcompany to fulfill the contract.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
19/72
19
The term CONCESSION in general, covers situations where the government retains
ultimate ownership of either the physical assets or the right to supply but grants
exploits rights to concessionaire.
Thus, for a road project, through a concession agreement, NHAI or any other granting
authority grants the concessionaire the right to use land, construct the road, operate
and maintain it. The concession agreement thus consists of all terms and conditions
governing the granting authority and concessionaire.
4. SHARE HOLDERS AGREEMENT: The project sponsors are required to infuseequity into the Project Company based on the financial structure designed. To ensure
sponsors commitment to the project there might be certain clauses in the concession
agreement requiring the sponsor to have certain level of equity contribution in the
project company during the duration of the contract. Thus, there is a shareholders
agreement to such effects between the Project sponsors and Project Company, which
serves as an assurance to the lenders and the granting authority.
5. EPC and O&M CONTRACT: The project sponsors through the project companygive the contracts for engineering, procurement and construction, operation and
maintenance to other companies. In most cases, it is observed that EPC contractor is
generally project group Sponsor Company.
6. DEBT AGREEMENT: Finally, to arrange for the debt funds required for the project,the project company enters into a debt agreement with the Lenders. The road projects
are mostly financed through the project finance route. Project finance essentially
means non-recourse or limited recourse financing.
Non-recourse Project financing means there is no recourse to the project sponsors
assets for the debts and liabilities of an individual projects handled by the project
company.
Limited Recourse financing means that there are limited obligations and
responsibilities of the project sponsor as far as the debts and liabilities of the project
company are concerned.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
20/72
20
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK:
Several line ministries handle transport planning, coordination, and policy setting at the
central government level, with overall coordination by the Planning Commission. NHAI was
constituted and operational zed in February 1995, and given the status of an autonomous
corporate body, under the control of the ministry of surface transport (MOST). The following
diagram gives the institutional framework for the roads sector:
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
21/72
21
Institutional framework diagram
Planning commission
(Overall policy framework, overall integration, approval)
MORTH(Release and allocation of funds for
development and maintenance of nationalhighways)
MORD(Release and allocation for development
and maintenance of rural roads)
Roads departmentNHAI
(NH and NHDP implementation,operation and maintenance)
Central
Level
Planning, policy and budgeting
State PWDs for
roads-SH wing(construction
&maintenance ofSH)
State PWDs for roads
(construction &maintenance of
MDRs &rural roads
[for some states])
Secretary
(Panchayat Raj)
Panchayat Raj engineering dept.(for construction & maintenance of
rural roads in some states)
Road DevelopmentCorporation(Construction, maintenance,
operation of roads)
State
Level
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
22/72
22
In June 2009, the erstwhile ministry of shipping, road transport and highways (MOSRTH)
has been segregated into two ministries, ministry of road transport and highways (MORTH)
and ministry of shipping and ports (MOSP).
At the central level, the planning commission in consultation with the ministry of road
transport and highways and the ministry of rural development (MORD) prepares the overall
policy, program development and resources planning. MORTHs duties relate to the
development and maintenance of national highways and policies on transport.
National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) is the implementing agency for
implementation, operation and maintenance of national highways. NHAI was constituted and
operational zed in February 1995; it was given the status of an autonomous corporate body
under the control of MORTH. However, the central government, in view of national interests,
has powers to divest NHAI of its responsibilities
At the state level, the overall policy, program development and resource planning is done by
the state planning cell in consultation with the central level planning commission and the
state ministry of roads.
State public works department (PWDs) and Road development corporations are
implementing agencies at the state level implementing, operating and maintaining the state
highways, major district roads and rural roads in few states.
The Ministry of Rural Development (MORD) is responsible for policy development as well
as monitoring and coordination of rural roads.
Apart from the state PWDs, the Panchayat Raj also implements the construction and
maintenance of rural roads.
The ministries allocate and release funds, for the development of roads, to the respective
implementing agencies.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
23/72
23
POLICY FRAMEWORK:
The highways sector in India is witnessing a significant interest from both domestic as well
as foreign investors following the policy initiatives taken by the government of India to
promote Public Private Partnership (PPP) on Build, Operate and Transfer (BOT) basis.
However, the inflow of investment will depend on a comprehensive policy and regulatory
framework necessary for addressing the complexities of PPP. For sustaining the private
investment in up gradation and maintenance of the highways on BOT basis, a precise policy
and regulatory framework has spelt out in a model concession agreement (MCA) which
affects all the parties and is at a core of any road project. Therefore let us understand some of
concerns that were associated with the draft MCA and thereafter discuss some of its key
points.
Model concession agreement
Land acquisition clause: One of the major points of contention was the landacquisition clause. The MCA required the NHAI to acquire 80% of land prior to
awarding the contract for the project. This clause was inserted keeping in mind the
delays in major projects due to land acquisition problems. Though it would speed up
the completion of the projects, NHAI felt that 80% was a large amount of land, it
would require about 9-12 months and this would delay award of projects.
Penalties on NHAI for delay: The new MCA included penalties to be imposed onNHAI (cash amount per 1000sq.kmto be paid to the concessionaire by NHAI) in case
the land was not acquired and handed over in time. This made the land acquisition
clause even more contentious and caused much delay in the approval of the MCA.
Clause on environmental clearances: The MCA also included obtaining theenvironmental clearance prior to award by NHAI. This too became a matter of
concern for NHAI as obtaining environmental clearance is also a long-drawn process
(often taking 12 months). NHAI felt that this clause too would have proved a
hindrance in the award of projects and result in the further delay in NHDP.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
24/72
24
State support agreement (SSA): The SSA is another major reason of delay. TheSSA is not a part of the MCA. At the time of MCA approval, NHAI had cited that
finalizing as SSA for each project with every state was proving to be extremely
difficult and that the Committee of Infrastructure (COI) should provide some relief.
Committee of infrastructure (COI) claims to have taken various initiatives to provide relief
to NHAI regarding the above issues.
As regards land acquisition, a temporary respite (for two years) has been given. NHAInow has to acquire 50% of the prior to the award of the project.
As far as the SSA is concerned, the COI suggested an umbrella agreement forprojects. This would be a bilateral agreement between the union and the state
government and replace the current tripartite agreement between the union
government and concessionaire, the COI has also advised NHAI to work out a
bilateral SSA for whichever states it can, use the tripartite agreement for the
remaining states.
Key points to the MCA:
Land acquisition clause: As mentioned earlier, the MCA provides the NHAI has toacquire 80% of the land prior to awarding the contract for the project. However, a
respite of two years has been given during which only 50% of the land will be
required to be acquired. This provision will lead to speeding up of the process of
completion of the projects and developers can be assured largely that project will not
get stalled due to land acquisition problems. This directly will also make the lenders
feel comfortable in financing the project.
Partial traffic risk mitigation provision: It is generally recognized that economicgrowth will have a direct influence on the growth of traffic and that the concessionaire
cannot in any manner manage or control this growth rate. By way of risk mitigation
the MCA provides for extension of the concession period in the event of a lower than
expected growth in traffic. Conversely, the concession period is proposed to be
reduced if the traffic growth exceeds the expected level.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
25/72
25
The MCA provides for a target traffic growth and stipulates an increase of up to 20%
in the concession period if the growth rate is lower than projected. Thus a shortfall of
1% in the target traffic after 10 years will lead to extension of the concession period
by 1.5% .On the other hand, an increase in 1% in the target traffic will reduce the
concession period by 0.75% (subject to maximum of 10%).
Financial closure: Unlike other agreements for private infrastructure projects, whichneither define a time frame for achieving financial close, nor specify the penal
consequences for failure to do so, the MCA stipulates a time limit of 180 days
(extendable up to another 120 days on payment of a penalty), failing which the bid
security, shall be forfeited. By prevalent standards, this is a tight schedule, which is
achievable only if all the parameters are well defined and the requisite preparatory
work has been undertaken.
The MCA represents the comprehensive framework necessary for enabling financial
close within the stipulated period. Adherence to such time schedules will usher in a
significant reduction in costs besides providing the over-due infrastructure this
approach would also address the present trend where infrastructure projects do not
achieve financial close for long period.
Toll rates indexed only to the extent of 40% of the WPI: The MCA provides forindexation of the user fee only to the extent of 40% of WPI as it has been
contemplated that repayment of debt would be neutral to inflation. However, as the
toll rates in India are one of the lowest in the world, it has been proposed that a flat
rate of 3% shall be added to the toll rates to keep the projects financially viable.
Although the MCA provides for indexation of the user fee only to the extent of 40%
of WPI, the toll rates will be revised upwards by another 2.5% annually to maintain
the viability of the stretches.
Concession fee: Concession fee will be fixed sum of Re.1 per annum for the first nineyears of the concession period. During the tenth year, the concession fee will be equal
to 1% of the project revenues and for each subsequent year, it will increase by an
additional 1%.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
26/72
26
The rationale for the above fee structure is that in the initial years, debt service
obligation would entail substantial outflows. Over the years, however, the
concessionaire will have an increasing surplus in his hand owing to the declining debt
service and rising revenues. Recognizing this cash flow pattern, the concession fee to
be paid by the concessionaire will be on an ascending revenue sharing basis.
Scope of the project: The MCA defines the scope of the project with precision andpredictability in order to enable the concessionaire to determine his costs and
obligations. Additional works may be undertaken within the specified limit, only if
the entire cost thereof is borne by the authority.
Operation and maintenance: The MCA provides for an elaborate and dynamicmechanism to evaluate and upgrade safety requirements on a continuity basis. The
MCA also provides for traffic regulation, police assistance, emergency medical
services and rescue operation. This will help in ensuring a high level of service for the
users.
Viability gap funding (VGF) unchanged at 40% of the project cost: In no case,the government shall provide grant in excess of 40% of the project cost. Where the
minimum grant needed is more than 40% of the project cost, the project will be
awarded either on annuity or cash control basis.
Other key features of the MCA:
A regular traffic census and annual survey has been stipulated for keeping track oftraffic growth. Sample checks by the authority have been also provided for. As a
safeguard against leakage of revenue share, a floor level is present and projected
traffic has been stipulated.
The option of upgrading a highway from four to six lanes during the concessionperiod has been introduced.
The concessionaire has been entitled to levy and collect user fee and liquidatedamages from vehicle owners attempting to make unauthorized use of highways.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
27/72
27
The MCA also address issues relating to dispute resolution, suspension of rights,change in law, insurance, defects liability, indemnity and redreesal of public
grievances and disclosure of project documents.
LEGAL FRAMEWORK:
Central level initiatives:Administrations of roads have to go hand - in - hand with the jurisdiction of the
central government and states government. Some of the legislations governing the
roads sector are:
Indian Tolls Act, 1851:This act enables the government to levy tolls on public roads and bridges within
certain rates. Certain states have modified this act to enable toll collection by private
investors in roads projects.
Land Acquisition Act, 1894:The act empowers the center or state government, and its agencies, to acquired land
required for construction of highways by paying compensation.
Dispute Settlement Act, 1940:Any dispute between government and private enterprise has to be settled through
arbitration as per the act. A dispute between government and foreign enterprise has to
be settled either in accordance with dispute settlement act, or in accordance with the
provision of United Nations Commission on International Trade Laws (UNCITRAL).
National Highways Act, 1956:Legislations about national highways are as per the national highways act (NHA),
1956. The NHA authorizes the central government to notify any highways as national
highways. The NHA also provides for de-notification of a national highway. The
portion of national highway falling within the municipal limits of a time with a
population of more than 20,000 is automatically de-notified. For all other roads, the
planning and coordinating agency is the state PWD which acquires the land required
for construction under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
28/72
28
Motor Vehicle Act, 1988:It is a central legislation that consolidates and rationalizes the various laws regulating
road transport in the country. The levy of road usage charges on the vehicles is
governed by either the Motor Vehicle Tax Acts or equivalent Acts.
National Highway Authority Of India Act, 1988:The National Highway Authority of India Act was passed in 1988. They provides for
the constitution of the authority for the development, maintenance and management of
national highways in India. The act specifies that the principal function of the
authority would be to develop, maintain and manage national highways entrusted to it
by central government. The functional profile of NHAI, as envisaged in the act,
includes:
Surveying, developing, maintaining and managing national highways and related
facilities like regulating and controlling the movement of vehicles on these highways
Collecting fees / charges on behalf of the central government
The 1995 amendment to the NHA, 1956 permits:
Assignment of the responsibility to the private developer for theimplementation and operation of projects for a specified period through a
concession agreement
Collection and retention of toll by the developer for the usage of the highwayfor meeting construction, maintenance, management, operational expenses,
interest on the borrowing raised, and a reasonable return on investment
Regulation and control of the traffic on the private sector highways by theprivate parties
Punishment to any person encroaching and misusing the highway developedby private parties
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
29/72
29
Central Road Fund Act, 2000:The central road fund was created based on the Central Road Fund Act, promulgated
in November 2000. Revenues from CESS on petrol and diesel production and imports
accrue to CRF. The CESS is routed through the consolidated fund of India to CRF.
The fund is non-lapsable.
State Level Initiatives:To stimulate private sector participation in roads project, several state governments
have taken favorable initiatives such as making appropriate amendment to The Motor
Vehicles Tax Act, The Indian Tolls Act and enacting Infrastructure Development
Acts.
Ownership:The government usually owns the road; it also has the right to develop and maintain
them. However, in case of BOT project, the right to develop, maintain collection and
retention of tolls is given to the concessionaire of the project. However, even in such
cases the ownership of the road is not transferred to the concessionaire. These projects
are transferred back to the government at the end of the pre-determined concession
period.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
30/72
30
5. PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN ROAD SECTOR.
Publicprivate partnership (PPP) describes a government service or private business
venture which is funded and operated through a partnership of government and one or
more private sector companies. These schemes are sometimes referred to as PPP, P3 or P 3.
PPP involves a contract between a public sector authority and a private party, in which the
private party provides a public service or project and assumes substantial financial, technical
and operational risk in the project. In some types of PPP, the cost of using the service is borne
exclusively by the users of the service and not by the taxpayer. In other types (notably
the private finance initiative), capital investment is made by the private sector on the strength
of a contract with government to provide agreed services and the cost of providing the service
is borne wholly or in part by the government. Government contributions to a PPP may also be
in kind (notably the transfer of existing assets). In projects that are aimed at creating public
goods like in the infrastructure sector, the government may provide a capital subsidy in the
form of a one-time grant, so as to make it more attractive to the private investors. In some
other cases, the government may support the project by providing revenue subsidies,
including tax breaks or by providing guaranteed annual revenues for a fixed period.
Typically, a private sector consortium forms a special company called a "special purpose
vehicle" (SPV) to develop, build, maintain and operate the asset for the contracted period. In
cases where the government has invested in the project, it is typically (but not always)
allotted an equity share in the SPV. The consortium is usually made up of a building
contractor, a maintenance company and bank lender(s). It is the SPV that signs the contract
with the government and with subcontractors to build the facility and then maintain it. In
the infrastructure sector, complex arrangements and contracts that guarantee and secure
the cash flows and make PPP projects prime candidates for project financing. A typical PPP
example would be a hospital building financed and constructed by a private developer and
then leased to the hospital authority. The private developer then acts as landlord, providing
housekeeping and other non-medical services while the hospital itself provides medical
services.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_sectorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_finance_initiativehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_sectorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_goodhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_goodhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrastructurehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsidyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grant_(money)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_breakhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annuity_(finance_theory)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_purpose_vehiclehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_purpose_vehiclehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ownership_equityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrastructurehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cash_flowhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Financehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Financehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cash_flowhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrastructurehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ownership_equityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_purpose_vehiclehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_purpose_vehiclehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annuity_(finance_theory)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_breakhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grant_(money)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsidyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrastructurehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_goodhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_goodhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_sectorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_finance_initiativehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_sector -
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
31/72
31
NEED FOR THE PPP MODEL:
Financing road projects has always been a tricky proposition, given the complexities of road
projects, which are actually common across all infrastructure projects. Road projects are
characterized by high upfront costs and long payback periods and the private investor is often
unable to provide the large initial capital required and is not capable of obtaining matching
long-term finance thereby making it difficult for them to get involved in road development.
In addition, it is difficult to cover all costs completely through pricing the road services.
Finally, cross subsidization, which forms an important part of infrastructure provision, is
easier done by the public sector than the private sector. Thus, financing of road was until
recently a government activity. However in recent times, from the second phase of NHDP,
there has been a paradigm shift in funding road projects from the government to the private
sector. The main reasons for it are as follows:
Though India has second largest road network in the world, it is characterised by lowstandard roads, which are mostly two-lane with high traffic, low service and slow
speeds. There is barely some network of high quality, high capacity highways, and
expressways. Thus, there is a significant deficit in the availability of good road
transport, which the primary transport system in India and it is increasingly a major
constraint to faster economic growth and social development.
The total number of PPP projects listed officially was 170 which are operational innature. The private sector has ability to take up large shelf of infrastructure
investments, which the government has to take advantage of, so that it can attract the
required capital.
The government is facing budgetary constraints in making funds available to meetthe huge requirements of the infrastructure sector.
The government is putting greater emphasis on allocation of budgetary resources tosocial services sector such as health and education.
In general, there has been dissatisfaction with the performance of state providedroads and highways.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
32/72
32
BENEFITS OF THE PPP MODEL:
In addition to the factors, following are some benefits of the private sector participation in
road sector, which explain the increased focus on the PPP model.
The private sector is more capable of making efficient utilization of resources. Through private sector participation the government can have access to specialized
expertise, proprietor technology and managerial efficiencies, which is very critical in
successful project implementation. Significant efficiency improvements, For example,
can be achieved by involving the private sector in the design and construction of
infrastructure facilities, even when they are owned and managed by the public sector.
The private sector has more flexible procurement procedures than the public sectorand therefore it can speed up implementation efforts helping the government develop
large scale implementation capacity in a short span of time.
Finally, the high investment and long gestation period of 15-20 years being thecharacteristic features of infrastructure projects, involving private sector will help in
sharing the projects risk.
The benefits of private sector involvement are largely attributable to a few key features that
are unique to the private sector viz.
a) Great flexibility in adjusting its resources and procedures.b) A comprehensive approach so that when entrusted with a long-term contract, private
firms can balance expenditure over the project lifecycle and make optimal trade-offs
between investment, maintenance and operation costs and.
c) The ability to access cutting-edges technology and equipments.
However, given the difficulties in recovering all costs through direct user charges alone,
continued support of the government in raising additional resources- either directly through
budgetary support or indirectly through collection of proxy user charges such as levy on fuel-
assumes critically in encouraging private participation in the road sector. For example, the
NHDP too envisages substantive government support in the form of raising a sizeable
quantum of resources through cess revenues. Given the vast sums of public money involved,
it is only prudent that the government play an important role in supervising and monitoring
the quality of road services and ensuring that funds are optimally utilised.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
33/72
33
Thus, very clearly there is an increasing recognition that successful provision of road services
entails a sustained collaborative effort between the public (government and its agencies) and
private (investors and entrepreneurs) sectors. In such a Public-Private Partnership (PPP)
arrangement, the role of public sector will and should be focused more on the core functions
of supervision and regulation, whereas the private sector should assume greater
responsibilities and risks in execution, operation and the mobilisation of resources.
TYPES OF PPP MODELS IN THE ROADS SECTOR:
There are several models of public private partnerships that can be considered for road
development. In this section we will briefly describe some of these models and examine the
different risk involved.
PPP models in roads
PPP models in roads:
a) Civil works/ cash contract: A traditional way of involving private sector is tocontract and bid out the construction process based on defined designs and
specifications. In this process, the government/road agency appoints an EPC
contractor who is awarded a construction contract. The responsibility of the
construction is placed on him subject to appropriate supervision. In such as
arrangement, on completion of construction, the road would be ready for use and
would have to be maintained by government.
Civilworks/cash
BOT direct
tolling
BOT shadow
tollingAnnuity
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
34/72
34
The critical success factor in this model is to ensure that the risks are properly
defined. The government should carryout closely scrutiny of the bidders reputation
and the responsiveness of his bid, and incorporate these factors when awarding a
contract to ensure that it is protected against irresponsibly low that may later result in
excess claims and controversy.
b) Build Operate Transfer (BOT) direct tolling: In this model a concession is awardedto a private entity (the concessionaire) to build, operate and collect toll on a road for a
specified period of time (usually 15-20 years), at the end of which the road is
transferred back to the government free of charge. The investment in the road is to be
recovered directly through user fees by the way of tolls. However as mentioned
earlier, the government does provide some viability gap funding/grant on case-to-case
basis to make the project financially viable.
ADVANTAGES OF BOT PROJECTS:
BOT projects have several advantages such as-
1.
The government gets the benefit of the private sector to mobilize finances and to usethe best management skills in the construction, operation and maintenance of the
project.
2. The private participation also ensures efficiency and quality by using the bestequipment.
3. The projects are conducted in a fully competitive bidding situation and are thuscompleted at the lowest possible cost.
DISADVANTAGES OF BOT PROJECTS:
1. It involves multiple entities and requires a relatively complicated legal andinstitutional framework. As a result, it may take a long time and considerable up
front expenses to prepare and close a BOT financing deal.
2. The BOT modality may not be suitable for small projects.3. Success of the project depends on the accuracy of traffic projections.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
35/72
35
c) Build Operate Transfer (BOT) shadow tolling: This is similar model to the onedescribed above, except that in this case the money is recovered directly from the
government through shadow tolls. The authority granting the concessions repays the
concessionaires investment through public funding based on the number of vehicles
observed to be using the road within a certain specified period or a similar indicator.
This model is to some extent a direct subsidy of road services by the government as
users do not pay directly for the road services that they use. This method of financing
is often used by the government to provide security to the concessionaire when there
is high traffic risk, more specifically when there is a risk that are likely to divert to
alternative roads to avoid paying tolls.
d) Annuity: The annuity model comprises of a composite contract, combining theconstruction of civil works and their maintenance for a subsequent period of around
15 years. In this approach, the contractor receives a fixed semi-annual payment over
the life of the contract instead of receiving a payment for the civil works, as they are
completed over a period of construction. This semi-annual payment implicitly consist
of a deferred payment for the civil works portion of construction and a levelised
payment for maintenance works undertaken over a contract period . In this case, the
annuity payment made to the contractor is based on unit rates quoted by the contractor
and the actual usage of materials and labour used during the construction as verified
by the supervising engineers.
THE ADVANTAGES OF ANNUITY/SHADOW TOLLS ARE:-
1. Suitable for projects where direct toll mechanism is not feasible or is inadequate tomake the project viable
2. Reduces resistance associated with privatization3. Revenue liability for the government is spread over the concession period4. The government can draw upon various revenue sources to contribute to the shadow
toll fund
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
36/72
36
THE DISADVANTAGES OF ANNUITY/SHADOW TOLLING ARE:-
1. Requires higher budgetary support from the government2. Government funds used for servicing private debt, which is likely to be more
expensive than debt raised by the government
3. It would be difficult for the government to justify direct toll on certain highways andshadow toll on others (i.e. subsidization of cost of road usage in selective cases)
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
37/72
37
RATIONALE FOR SHADOW TOLLS /ANNUITY SCHEMES
Highways in some developed countries such as UK, Germany and Netherlands are toll-free;
however other countries such as France, Italy, Japan, and Korea have a network of toll roads.
USA has a mix of both. Over a period of several decades they have allocated adequate funds
therefore their incremental requirements are marginal. Moreover, being comparatively
affluent economies, they can in any case afford a higher level of public spending. On the
other hand, developing economies such as China, Indonesia, Brazil, Mexico and Argentina
have been increasingly relying on user charges for funding their program of accelerated road
development.
In all infrastructure projects such as power, electricity, telecom, airports, ports, irrigation and
water supply, it is normal to levy a user charge, even though there may be subsidies for a
selected targeted group. A user-paid highway development would also ensure a superior level
of maintenance through the BOT Concessionaire. Improved service for a small fee can hardly
be questioned if such fee reduces the travel time and running cost of the vehicles.
Risk allocation:
The above PPP models being different in nature from each other, the risk allocation between
the contractors also differs in each case. The following table gives how certain important
risks are allocated in each of the model, from as investors perspective.
Allocation of key risks from an investors perspective:
Public-private
partnership
Agency/government
credit risk
Project
completion
Traffic risk
Civil works Yes Yes No
BOT(direct
tolling) No Yes Yes
BOT(shadow
tolling) Yes Yes Yes
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
38/72
38
6. IMPORTANT FACTORS CONSIDERED WHILE APPRAISING
ROAD PROJECT:
One of the most important factor is the past track record and profile of the sponsors. Here the
Group company structure and financial performance is looked into. The sponsor and its group
companies, share capital, reserves, investments, income and profits are taken into
consideration. The sponsor's track record in terms of successfully executing projects is also
important.
When looking at the above-mentioned details, a lender tries to envisage the commitment of
the sponsors. Here a very important commitment issue remains open to question. Generally
the debt-equity ratio of road projects averages around 4:1. The EPC contractor belongs to the
sponsor's group company. The KPC contract consists of 80% of the project cost and it has a
profit margin of around 25% which is recovered at the end of the construction period. Thus,
the promoter effectively recovers his equity in the initial period of the project whereas the
payment to lenders is back ended. This shifts the project risk wholly to the lenders and leaves
the sponsors commitment to complete the project and service debt open to consideration.
Financial Indicators are used to decide on the viability of the road project and hence
financially structure the project to aid in the lending process. Some of the most important
financial indicators are -
1. Debt-Equity ratio (DER):- It is the ratio of debt and equity employed in a roadproject. It forms a part of the capital structure of the project. The lenders generally
prefer a lower DER since it results in equal sharing of risk by the sponsors and the
lenders and results in increased sponsor commitment. The ratio can be as low as 2:1
or even less for high-risk projects to 19:1 for low risk projects like BOT-annuity.
2. Debt Servicing Coverage Ratio (DSCR) - It is the amount of cash flow available tomeet annual interest and principal payments on debt including sinking fund payments.
It is the ratio of net operating income and annual debt servicing. A DSCR below 1
indicates a negative cash flow, which is undesirable by lenders.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
39/72
39
In road project financing a minimum average DSCR of 1.25 is necessary for the entire
repayment period. If the DSCR is below that, the project may not be viable. Also in
any of the years if the DSCR dips below the average, then a default is invoked and the
project company has to immediately correct the ratio through increased cash flows.
3. Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Cost of Capital: - It is a capital budgetingmethod used by firms to decide whether they should make long-term investments. It is
defined as any discount rate that results in the NPV of zero of a series of cash flows.
A project is a good investment if its IRR is greater than the rate of return that could be
earned in alternative investments. Thus if IRR is greater than the projects cost of
capital or hurdle rate, the project will add value for the company.
Thus since road projects have a long gestation period and the payments are back
ended, ballooning towards the end, the lenders have to keep a track of the DSCR and
lend at an appropriate DER. The developers on the other hand have to ensure the
viability of the project through a high IRR. All the financial indicators are dependent
on the present value of the cash flows of the project. The financial indicators can be
worked out from case to case and depends on the way the loan is structured.
4. Traffic Projection is one of the most critical factors in a toll road project. The objective ofa traffic study is to establish -
The existing and future toll able traffic on the project corridor for the period of theconcession. The volumes of vehicles plying which are eligible for toll exemption
(Army, govt, vehicles, ambulances, fire tenders etc.).
Identify and assess toll category. Assess the potential traffic diversion: Presence of alternate routes for Project routes
may result in leakage of traffic.
Thus in the traffic study gray areas exists regarding the quality of traffic study conducted and
estimation of traffic growth rates based on economic growth rate of the state, growth in
registered vehicles and transport demand elasticity. One more factor of concern is the
potentiality of leakage. Alternate routes available or bypassing the toll booths can rob the
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
40/72
40
road of its projected revenues. These gray areas might result in actual traffic being lower than
traffic projections and as a result hitting the cash flows of the project.
5. Right of way is also a concern. For e.g. if a continuous stretch of land is not allottedinitially, working on fragmented strips is inefficient and adds to the costs. Non-
arrangement of permits and clearances especially from the forest and environmental
departments may result in significant delays. Geographical location is an important
factor while considering a project. For e.g. in certain states like Bihar and Uttar
Pradesh there can be law and order problems and people might not have willingness
to pay.
6. Transparency of contractual agreement entered into with counter-parties in mostof the cases, the EPC contractor is a group company of the sponsor. Thus, there exists
a risk of lack of transparency. However most projects are taken up with reputed
sponsors, which ensure transparency. Contractual agreement between the sponsor and
EPC contractor is generally a fixed time and fixed cost contract, which ensures no
cost overruns and payment of penalties in case of a delay in completion. The
contractual agreement entered into with the O&M contractor must be transparent andchecked for ambiguities.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
41/72
41
8. TRAFFIC STUDY:The most important part of all transport projects is whether the projected traffic is similar to
the actual traffic. The success of any toll project lies in the thorough study of the vehicular
traffic. Reasonably accurate traffic forecasts depend on the quality of input data, technical
expertise and realistic growth assumptions. In many cases, it has been observed that
independent audits of traffic forecasts and the use of sensitivity analysis techniques on key
variables have increased the comfort level of all the concerned parties, viz. project developers
and financial institutions.
Majority of the road projects in India are BOT toll projects, where the projects are debt
backed by toll revenues and limited or no government guarantees, the traffic forecasts are
very important to the lenders
The type of the project will also influence the accuracy of the traffic forecast. For e.g.
BANDRAWORLI sea link toll bridge is designed to be a congestion-reliever. However the
MUMBAI PUNE expressway highway is designed for convenience and short route
travelling.
Method of Data Collection:
Five methods of data collection are generally used they are as follows :
1. Roadside Interviews (RSI): Vehicles are stopped by Police Officers and the drivers
are asked to answer questions about the origin, destination and purpose of their journey.
2. Automatic Traffic Count (ATC): Machines automatically count the number ofpassing vehicles.
3. Number Plate Recognition Survey (NPRS): The number plates of passing vehiclesare recorded by observers at two different sites. The records are compared to
determine how many vehicles passed through both sites within a 15 minute period.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
42/72
42
4. Manual Classified Count (MCC): Observers count the number of vehicles passing agiven point on a road and classify them according to vehicle type (e.g. Heavy Goods
vehicles, cars, motorbikes etc.).
5. Manual Classified Turning Count (MCTC): Observers count the number ofvehicles passing through a junction according to the manoeuvre they make at the
junction, and classify the vehicles according to type (e.g. cars, motorbikes etc).
ASSESSING THE FUTURE TRAFFIC
The most basic element of financial projections is the traffic forecast. For most projects, even
with those with a guaranteed revenue stream, the source of cash projection needs to be
carefully considered. Important details that need to kept in mind while assessing the cash
flows.
Price - Volume sensitivity - It describes the demand function as toll price increaseswill the consumers still use the same route or will he opt for a alternative route. In a
country like India people are price-sensitive.
Traffic volatility - Traffic volumes may vary with seasons, business cycles or eventhe time of day. Volume fluctuations with respect to business cycle is perhaps the
most dangerous type of volatility, because the high debt financial structure of most
project financing requires steady cash flows to service the high fixed cost which
represents interest and principal payments.
Creating Traffic - When a new infrastructure project provides an improved serviceof a new type of service, much of the demand is created rather then met. For example,
a new bridge may relieve some of the congestion on existing river crossing, but the
reduced congestion might encourage additional traffic. This can be the third source of
revenue, as the people who might not otherwise decide to use the bridge will do so
due to reduced traffic delays.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
43/72
43
SUGGESTIONS FOR A MORE REALISTIC PROJECTION OF TRAFFIC
Following are the suggestions made for a more realistic projection of traffic for assessing the
viability of toll-based road projects under appraisal stage:
1. As the entire traffic projections are dependent on the base traffic, accuracy of the basetraffic data is very crucial. Here, the number of days of actual count of traffic and the
locations on the project road where the traffic count has been carried out play an
important role and should be carefully selected and moderated for seasonal variations,
etc.
2. Use of Global Positioning System (GPS) technology may be considered to assess thedirection / flow and volume of traffic.
3. The following factors need to be considered while arriving at growth rate for futuretraffic projections:
Shifts in inter-modal transport and competition from railways.Possibilityof diversion of traffic due to continued existence / availability of alternate
road facility.
Surveys on ability and willingness of users to pay toll.4. Finally, conservative estimation of traffic volumes and revenue generation should
be made at the appraisal stage itself, by using appropriate sensitivity analysis tools.
RATIONALE FOR INTRODUCING TOLL CHARGES
One or more of the following objectives are typically the reason for introducing tolls on the
road network:
1. Source of Finance - The toll revenue is a "new" source of revenue for the contractorswho were previously paid out of Government revenues.
"Stable" Source of Finance: Tolls provide an ongoing revenue source, which isnot tied to the annual Government budgetary process. This can be particularly
important for raising debt finance outside the national accounts and requires a
Government Corporation or private sector operator.
Dedicated Source of Finance: The funds from toll revenues can be dedicated tothe support of construction and maintenance for a particular road thereby ensuring
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
44/72
44
that maintenance funds in particular do not compete with the requirements of
other roads in the network.
2. User pays - Government has introduced tolls in pursuit of a general policy to increasethe extent of "use related payment".
3. Private Sector Development - Government has sought private sector participation inroads where there was a need to develop the road network, and also to develop the
private sector within the economy at the same time. In addition the involvement of the
private sector can allow the government to finance at least part of the road
development off balance sheet. Government can also use the private sector
concessions as a mechanism for promoting/explaining the introduction and increase of
tolls to a reluctant public.
4. Creating a stream of revenues - which can be used to develop the road network andwhich are not under control of the annual Government funding process. This requires
tolling to continue until the required network is complete and requires the earlier
roads to generate surplus revenues for investment in new ones. Few Governments
admit to having completed a road network however, and Ensuring that road users bear
the full cost of their travel directly, by pricing the externalities, which also requires
continued tolling.
The objective for each road will affect both the level of toll and the period of tolling. Where
tolls are simply required to cover construction costs, and the traffic levels are high, then tolls
will only be required for a relatively short period. However where Governments seek to cover
maintenance and operations costs, tolls required are low and need to be levied continuously.
Where tolls are levied to allow extensions to the road network, the tolls would be required
only as long as further developments of the network are required.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
45/72
45
VARIATIONS IN TOLL COLLECTION
Typically tolls vary with distance travelled along the road and according to the number of
axles on the vehicle. This approach was first adopted because it can act as a proxy for the
road space used by the vehicle and the damage that the vehicle inflicts on the road pavement.
However other options (which can be combined) include:
1. Time of Day or Day of Week. Variation by time of day is typically used wherecongestion causes considerable delays to travelers. It depends on the value of time and the
decision-making criteria of travelers.
2. Seasonality -Any adverse development in the agricultural and industrial base of theprincipal origin and destination connected by the toll road can cause reduced traffic or
traffic diversions. Further, inter-State variations in the entry tax / octroi also cause traffic
diversions.
3. Cost of road construction. Tolls vary across the country, because of the different costsof road construction through different areas, for example roads cut through mountains are
likely to cost more to construct than those across flat open landscapes. Political incentives
for unified toll structures across the country may however prevent differentials in toll
across the country.
4. Social considerations. Charging different toll rates for different vehicles. Public transporttolled less compared to private vehicles.
5. Passes and other discounts. With the introduction of electronic tolling systems this sortof commercial action has been more feasible. Where the private sectors are involved
however the concession arrangements must allow for toll variations.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
46/72
46
INCREASING TOLLS OVER TIME.
NHAI has brought out the "National Highways - Collection of fees by any person for the use
of sections of National Highways / permanent bridge / temporary bridge on National
HighwaysRules" in 1997. Toll rates are prescribed by the Government / NHAI on the basis
of these Rules, toll rates are indexed to the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) and are revised
accordingly with effect from July 1 every year. Some State Governments also follow the
same Rules for prescription of toll rates. As the toll rates are prescribed by the Government /
NHAI / State Government in the concession agreement, estimation of traffic on a realistic
basis is of crucial importance in assessing the viability of road projects.
New tolling policy:
Parameters New tolling policy (2008)
With effect from April 1, 2008
Categorization of vehicles
Increase in base rate Rs per km
- Car/jeep/vans- LCV- Truck/bus- MAV- Oversized vehicles
5 types
0.65
1.052.20
3.45
4.20
Methodology for revision
in toll rates
Fixed 3 per cent + 40 per cent
of changes in WPI
Tolling rates for 2-lanednational highways
Tolling of permanent bridges,
bypasses or tunnels
60% of toll rates of 4-lanednational highways
If cost >Rs 0.5 bn. then
+Tolled separately.
Source: CRISIL Research, MORTH
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
47/72
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
48/72
48
9. RISKS IN ROAD PROJECTS: (Lenders View)
Risks at different stages of development of a road project are either borne by the Government
or the concessionaire. These risks, if not mitigated, would pass on to the lender. The
following are the various risks in road projects.
A.Construction Risks:1. Land acquisition: With the necessary statutory powers provided by the Land
Acquisition Act, 1894, the Government has taken responsibility to provide land (free
from encumberances), at no cost, required for development of roads / bridges. Public
resistance to a project may pose some problems, as issues like shifting of villages
could become a politically sensitive one. This could also be a time consuming
process, as it may involve obtaining clearances from various authorities viz. Ministry
of Environment and Forests, etc.
2. Financing arrangement: Timely financing arrangement is critical for successfulcompletion of road projects. The concessionaire needs to have the capability to raisenecessary finance for the project and also the additional flexibility to fund cost
overruns and withstand any financial difficulties. In some large road projects,
availability of finance in the domestic markets may not be adequate, in which case
funds have to be raised from international markets. Here, the concessionaire has to
consider country risks, foreign exchange risks and the lack of linkage between toll
rates and foreign exchange rate movements. Availability of project finance will
become easier with Government guarantees for debt repayment and foreign exchange
risks, assured toll revenues by way of shadow tolls and standby loans or diversion of
toll revenues from other profitable facilities (cross subsidisation).
3. Quality of construction: The quality of construction is defined by the Government /NHAI, and the concessionaire has to abide by the pre-defined norms. An independent
consultant usually certifies the quality of construction and a provisional certificate is
issued in the case of outstanding issues, which have to be ratified within a specific
time-frame. In the case of poor quality construction, the concessionaire is not only
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
49/72
49
penalised for the concerned project, but could also be disqualified during selection for
future contracts.
4. Timely completion of construction: Delay in land acquisition or financialarrangement, non-availability of necessary clearances, infrastructure and right-of-way
could lead to time and cost overruns, which will have to be borne by the
concessionaire. In addition, the concessionaire has to pay damages to the Government
/ NHAI for such delays, except in the case of Force Majeure events.
B.Operations and Maintenance Risks;1. Feeder / Link Roads: Timely construction and regular maintenance of feeder / link
roads, upon which, traffic flow depends, needs to be ensured. This risk is normally
borne by the concessionaire, which has to be taken into account while arriving at
realistic traffic projections.
2. Demand: The traffic flow on a road facility is estimated based on the growth inexisting traffic volumes (based on past trends and future potential), diverted traffic
and generated traffic. Traffic flow is affected by the development of a competing road
facility and improvement in the status of an existing free-access facility.
3. O&M cost escalation: The risk of increase in operations and maintenance costs, whichcan occur due to increase in input costs and taxes, is borne by the concessionaire. As
toll is regulated by the Government / NHAI, toll revision should adequately
compensate the concessionaire for cost escalation, or the concession period should be
extended to allow the concessionaire to earn the pre-specified level of return oninvestment.
4. Maintenance: Maintenance of the project highway has to be as per the MaintenanceManual and the standards agreed. The Government / NHAI imposes penalties for lack
of proper maintenance. The concessionaire can ensure availability of funds for
maintenance, by creating a Maintenance Reserve Fund.
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
50/72
50
5. Insolvency and debt: Insolvency of the concessionaire would result in substantialfinancial loss to lenders of the project and economic loss, due to the incomplete /
inadequately maintained facility. In such an event, the Government / NHAI, which
takes over construction and maintenance work, would need to have sufficient
financial strength. The lenders need to be provided with a step-in right to induct new
operator.
C.Legal, Regulatory and Political Risks:1. Legislation changes: In the case of BOT projects, the Government / NHAI
assumes the risk of any adverse impact due to legislation changes. In the case of a
toll-based project, if a change in law results in a financial loss of over Rs.1 crore
to either the Government / NHAI or the concessionaire, the affected party would
be compensated by the other. In the case of an annuity-based project, any loss to
the concessionaire, due to an increase in capital expenditure by over Rs.6 crore,
shall be compensated by the Government / NHAI.
2. Political: The political risk of a country is a key factor in the context of raisinginternational funds for a project. Any political turmoil, and the resultant changes
in the policy and economic environment, could lead to higher cost of financing
for the concessionaire.
3. Country Risk:There may be a situation where the host country is unable or unwilling to make
foreign exchange available to service external debt. This was a common feature
of international lending during the 1980's and had led to a situation where manygovernments and central banks have sought a re-scheduling of their external debt
due to insufficient foreign exchange to meet their obligations. This can be
controlled by actually generating revenue in hard currency.
D.Force Majeure Risks:Force Majeure events are beyond the control of any of the participants in the project.
These have to be either insured against or shared as per an agreed allocation in the
-
7/31/2019 Opportunities and Challenges in Funding Road Projects for Final
51/72
51
concession agreement. Proper attention to Force Majeure risks in the concession
agreement is as important as a Force Majeure event itself. Given the Government /
NHAIs commitment to meet the debt service obligations in the event of termination due
to Force Majeure events, lenders face lower risk.
Table : Allocation of Risks in a Road Concession Project:
Type Of Risk Government Private
Sector
Political Risks
Expropriation of the company Y
General modifications of the law and tax system Y
Specific modifications of the laws and tax system Y
Political events Y
Termination of the contract by the government Y
Limitation of currency convertibility Y
Materially adverse foreign action Y
Construction Risks
Land acquisition Y
Cost overrun (excluding change of project) Y
Cost overrun (change of project) Y
Increase of financial costs Y
Risk on administrative procedures delay time Y Y
Risk on schedule and quality of works Y Y
Damages incurred by the works Y
Bankruptcy of the p