Operationalizing the right to health in health systems Transparency and Accountability
description
Transcript of Operationalizing the right to health in health systems Transparency and Accountability
Operationalizing the right to health in health systems
Transparency and Accountability
Siri Gloppen Professor, Comparative Politics, UiB & CMI, Bergen Norway
4TH LATIN AMERICAN MEETING ON THE RIGHT TO HEALTH AND HEALTH SYSTEMS Bogotá, Colombia. April 2 to 4, 2014.
Accountability for what? How?• Two concepts of the Right to Health
• Transparency and accountability mechanisms– Enabling rights holders to claim rights– Enabling duty-bearers to provide
• Courts and beyond– Challenges of court based mechanisms for accountability in
health– Transparency and accountability in reform and policy
processes
Two concepts of the right to health (R2H)”right to the hightest attainable standard of physical and mental health”
R2H = individual (justiciable) claim
R2Hind
R2H = an equitable health system
R2Hsos
R2Hind “Right to the highest attainable standard
of physical and mental health” – Individual right to everything that is technically
possible to preserve/advance health? • regardless of costs
– Limited by resources (equivalent rights of everyone) ?
R2Hsos “Right to the highest attainable standard
of physical and mental health”
= Right to an equitable health system And (as large as possible) equitable share
Progressively realizedPremises:
- Resource scarcity- Citizens equal in worth, dignity = due equal concern, respect
Resource scarcity unavoidable condition and constraint in all health systems • particular challenge in highly unequal societies
Decisions to spend resources on particular patients/ services (implicitly) entail priority-setting /trade-offs
To not take seriously issues of justice in priority-setting denies others (who may have stronger entitlements) the right to health.
Fair health system
Reasonable allocation of (inevitably limited) resources
• Between patient groups– Cost-effectiveness of treatment (and strength of evidence)– Severity of the health condition
• Within patient groups– Social status, gender, sexual orientation, ethic groups etc– Based on vulnerability analysis; barriers to R2H
need for transparency and accountability mechanisms to ensure:
Fair and well functioning health system distributing resources equitably Fair priority to health relative to other social goods/rights
Fair treatment of each within – and equal access to – the system
Adequate aransparency and accountability mechanisms in health system / policy reform• Transparency on need and converage– Who (patient groups, social goups) – Why (determinants of health)
• Transparency and participation in setting and reivising goals and priorities
• … in relation to HTAs and their use• … in relation to guidelines• … in monitoring and implementation
Institutional mechanisms for claiming systemic reform -- and a fair share
• System internal mechanisms• Courts• Public protectors
Challenge for courts to reconcile the two concepts of the right to health
”right to the hightest attainable standard of physical and mental health”
R2Hind = individual (justiciable) claim
R2Hsos= an equitable health system
R2Hsos-ind = right to an equitable share