Operating System Overview CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems.
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
4
Transcript of Operating System Overview CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems.
Operating System Overview
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 2
Operating System
• A program that controls the execution of application programs
• An interface between applications and hardware
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 3
Operating System Objectives
• Convenience– Makes the computer more convenient to use
• Efficiency– Allows computer system resources to be used in an efficient
manner
• Ability to evolve– Permit effective development, testing, and introduction of
new system functions without interfering with service
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 4
Layers of Computer System
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 5
Services Provided by the Operating System
• Program development– Editors and debuggers
• Program execution• Access to I/O devices• Controlled access to files• System access• Error detection and response• Accounting
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 6
Operating System as Resource Manager
• Responsible for managing all computer resources
• Functions same way as ordinary computer software– It is program that is executed
• Operating system relinquishes control of the processor to execute other programs
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 8
Kernel
• Portion of operating system that is in main memory
• Contains most-frequently used functions
• Also called the nucleus
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 9
Operating Systems History
• Early 1950s:– Systems: Univac I, II; IBM 701, 704 – large, very expensive
• Serial Processing– No operating system– Machines run from a console with display lights and toggle
switches, input device, and printer– Common concerns:
• Idle time between jobs• Setup: running a job included loading the compiler,
source program, saving compiled program, and loading and linking
• Every programmer writes routines to control I/O devices
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 10
First Generation: Simple Batch Systems• Eastern Joint Computer Conference in 1953: informal
discussion of IBM users• GM develops input/output system for IBM 701
– Common set of procedures for access to I/O devices– Monitor concept: Resides in main memory and controls the
running programs; Batches jobs together; Program branches back to monitor when finished; Monitor starts next job
• GM and North American Aviation jointly develop supervisor program for IBM 704
• ‘Share’ Operating System (SOS) developed by IBM on 709 for Share user group– Supervisory control, buffered I/O, symbolic assembly
language
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 11
First Generation: Simple Batch Systems (Cont.)• Fortran Monitor System (FMS) on IBM 709
– Based on GM/NAA OS, first OS to support high-level language programming
• Real-Time and Transaction processing Systems– SAGE real-time control system (IBM AN/FSQ7 military
system)
– SABRE airline reservation system (IBM for American Airlines)
• Tape Operating Systems– Card input and output temporarily stored on tape
– Commonly used procedures (compilers) kept on tape
– Examples: TOS/360 for first S/360, TOS for RCA Spectra 70
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 12
First Generation: Simple Batch Systems (Cont.)• Disk Operating Systems
– Direct access to large amounts of data– Operating systems provided by computer manufacturer– Components: resident loader, Job Control Language (JCL),
Input/Output Control System (IOCS)– Examples: Admiral for Honeywell 1800, EXEC I for Univac
1107, Scope for Control Data 6000, Master Control Program for Burroughs 5000, IBSYS for IBM 709 and 7090
• ATLAS– Developed by Manchester Univ. and Ferranti– First use of interrupts, extracode (precursor of system call
instruction), and one-level store (precursor of virtual memory)
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 13
First Generation: Batch Multiprogramming• Batch processing: each job submitted as a ‘batch’ of
cards• Batch serial: jobs processed one at a time, each one
finishing before new one accepted• Batch multiprogramming: several programs execute in
interleaved manner and share CPU, memory, I./O devices – when a program waits for I/O completion, CPU given to other program
• SPOOLing (Simultaneous Peripheral Operation On-Line)– Spooler program reads jobs from cards and tapes onto disk
and copies output from disk to printer
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 14
First Generation: Batch Multiprogramming• Master Control Program (MCP) for Burroughs 5000
pioneered multiprogramming– Virtual memory– Priorities– High-level languages (Algol, Cobol) supported using
compilers
• IBM System/360 family (1964)– Evolvable: same program runs on entire family– DOS/360: interim disk OS– PCP: early version of OS/360– OS/MFT: batch multiprogramming for small S/360s– OS/MVT: batch multiprogramming for large S/360s– JCL: Large and powerful Job Control Language
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 15
Time-Sharing Systems
• Disadvantages of batch systems:– No direct user-program interaction– Long turnaround time
• Interactive computing– User and system programs on disk– JCL commands entered by user directly on terminal
• Time-sharing systems– Multiple users simultaneously access the system through
terminals– Processor’s time is shared among the multiple users– Time slice (time quantum) limits the amount of time (CPU)
received by each job
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 16
Time-Sharing Systems (Cont.)
• Compatible Time-Sharing System (CTSS) developed in early 60s by Project MAC at MIT on IBM 709, then 7094
• Dartmouth Time-Sharing System (DTSS)– Dartmouth College with General Electric
– ‘Basic’ language developed for use on DTSS
• TOPS-10 developed by DEC for PDP-10• TSS/360 developed by IBM for 360/67
– Virtual memory
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 17
Time-Sharing Systems (Cont.)
• MULTICS developed by project MAC (MIT, Bell Labs, GE) as successor of CTSS (1964)– Hardware: modified GE635 (called GE645) with virtual
memory and protection support– ‘Computing Utility’ concept– Segmented virtual memory, linking and loading segments on
demand, files and segments treated the same– ‘Rings of protection’– Hierarchical file system– Device independence– I/O redirection– Powerful user interface– Written in a high-level language (PL/1)
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 18
Abstract and Virtual Machines
• T.H.E. developed by Dijkstra at the Technological Univ. in Eindhoven, Holland in late 1960s– Major contributions to OS structuring and process
synchronization
– Structuring:
• Hierarchical structure made of layers
• Each layer, an abstract machine, i.e. apparent extension of real machine
– Interacting processes (sharing common resources)
• Semaphores for process synchronization
• Deadlock solutions
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 19
Abstract and Virtual Machines (Cont.)
• TENEX developed by Bolt, Beranek and Newman (BBN) for the PDP-10 in early 1970s– Time-sharing system with an abstract machine structure
• CP/CMS (Control Program/Conversational Monitor System) developed by IBM Research in Cambridge, MA– Virtual machine concept: apparent access to all machine features (virtual
memory, CPU, I/O devices)
– Hardware shared by several OSs (some being developed)
– Hardware:
• Modified S/360 model 40 (CP/40)
• Modified S/360 model 67 (CP/67)
– Product: VM/370 on S/370
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 20
Minicomputer Operating Systems• Mid-1950s: Burroughs E-101, Bendix G-15, Librascope LGP-30
– Machine language, no OS
• Early 1960s: CDC-160, IBM-1620• Early 1970s: DEC OS-8 and TSS-8 for PDP-8
– Interrupts, DMA
• Disk Operating System for IBM 1800• Oss named ‘keyboard monitor’ and ‘real-time monitor’
– Interactive interface for single user– Run one program at a time– Typical application: real-time control of lab. Operation
• DEC PDP-11 series– OS (RT-11) simple single user– RSTS time-sharing system– RSX-11 real-time executive (multiprogramming, memory management,
file system, powerful command language)
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 21
UNIX• Early 1970s: Bell Labs winds down MULTICS participation,
Ken Thompson and Dennis Richie design a new OS• Hardware: PDP-7 then PDP-11• Key features
– Hierachical file system– I/O devices, special cases of files– Powerful command language: ‘Shell’– Redirection: input/output from/to any sourse/destination in a Shell
command– Concurrent processes with inter-process communication– Languages
• Assembly language initially (PL/I not available for PDP)• Richie developed ‘C’ (BCPL B C)• ‘C’ compiler for PDP-11 developed• UNIX re-written in ‘C’
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 22
Large Systems: Super-Minis and Main Frame Systems
• VAX/VMS for the VAX family from DEC– Special instructions for OS support
– Extensive system services
– File management techniques
• UNIX implemented on the VAX
• OS/MVS (Multiple Virtual Storage)– Upgrade of OS/MVT for time-sharing (S/370) based on the
Time-Sharing Option (TSO) developed for MVT
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 23
Operating Systems for Micros• Early OSs: MITS, IMSAI, Apple, Tandy, Heath
develop simple OSs (loaders, ‘Basic’ language) running on Intel 8080, Zilog’s Z-80, Motorola’s 6800
• CP/M (Control Program for Microprocessors)– Developed by Gary Killdall at Intel on 8008, then 8080– Single user OS– Simple interactive command interface– Basic I/O device management– Floppy disk based file system– Programming language for microprocessors (PL/M)– Killdall obtains rights to distribute CP/M, forms Digital
Research– CP/M becomes dominant OS for micros
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 24
Operating Systems for Micros (Cont.)• CP/M limitations
– Limited user interface, file, and device management– No memory management, no multiprogramming
• SCP-DOS from Seattle Computer Products– Running on Intel 8086 (16-bit)– New features: memory management, timer management, interrupt
support, sophisticated file system
• MS-DOS: Upgraded SCP-DOS to run on several processors (SCP-DOS acquired by Microsoft)
• PC-DOS: Version of MS-DOS selected by IBM to run on their PC
• UNIX influence:– MS-DOS Version 2.0: Command interface like ‘Shell’, hierarchical file
system– Later versions of MS-DOS: Multiple users, multiple processes
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 25
Major Achievements
• Processes
• Memory Management
• Information protection and security
• Scheduling and resource management
• System structure
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 26
Processes
• Definitions for the term process– A program in execution
– An instance of a program running on a computer
– The entity that can be assigned to and executed on a processor
– A unit of activity characterized by a single sequential thread of execution, a current state, and an associated set of system resources
• Process components– An executable program
– Associated data needed by the program
– Execution context of the program or process state (e.g., contents of various processor registers, priority of the process)
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 27
Memory Management
• Process isolation
• Automatic allocation and management
• Support for modular programming
• Protection and access control
• Long-term storage
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 28
Information Protection and Security
• Access control– Regulating user access to the total system, subsystems, and
data
– Regulating process access to various resources
• Information flow control– Regulating the flow of data within the system and its delivery
to users
• Certification– Proving that access and flow control perform according to
specifications and that they enforce desired protection and security policies
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 29
Scheduling and Resource Management
• The operating system:– Manages the various resources: main memory space, I/O devices, and
processors, and
– Schedules their use by the active processes
• The resource allocation and scheduling policy must consider:– Fairness
• Give equal and fair access to all processes
– Differential responsiveness
• Discriminate between different classes of jobs with different service requirements
– Efficiency
• Maximize throughput, minimize response time, and accommodate as many users as possible
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 30
System Structure
• The size and complexity of operating systems have significantly increased in time to meet the needs of new features and complex hardware:– CTSS: 32,000 36-bit words of storage– OS/360: 1 million machine instructions– MULTICS: 20 million instructions– Windows NT 4.0: 16 million lines of code– Windows 2000: 32 million lines of code
• Methods for structuring operating system software– Modular software– Hierarchical structure: hierarchical layers and information abstraction
• View the system as a series of levels• Each level performs a related subset of functions• Each level relies on the next lower level to perform more primitive
functions
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 31
Operating System Design Hierarchy
Level Name Objects Example Operations
13 Shell User programming Statements in shell languageenvironment
12 User processes User processes Quit, kill, suspend, resume
11 Directories Directories Create, destroy, attach, detach,search, list
10 Devices External devices: Open, close, read, writeprinters, displaysand keyboards
9 File system Files Create, destroy, open, closeread, write
8 Communications Pipes Create, destroy, open. close,read, write
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 32
Operating System Design HierarchyLevel Name Objects Example Operations
7 Virtual Memory Segments, pages Read, write, fetch
6 Local secondary Blocks of data, Read, write, allocate, freestore device channels
5 Primitive processes Primitive process, Suspend, resume, wait, signalsemaphores, readylist
4 Interrupts Interrupt-handling Invoke, mask, unmask, retryprograms
3 Procedures Procedures, call Mark stack, call, returnstack, display
2 Instruction Set Evaluation stack, Load, store, add, subtractmicroprograminterpreter
1 Electronic circuits Registers, gates, Clear, transfer, activate,buses, etc. complement
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 33
Characteristics of Modern Operating Systems
• Microkernel Architecture– Only a few essential functions are assigned to the kernel
(address space, inter-process communication, and basic scheduling)
– Other OS services are provided by processes (servers) that run in user mode
• Symmetric MultiProcessing (SMP)– There are multiple processors
– These processors share same main memory and I/O facilities and are interconnected by an internal connection scheme
– All processors can perform the same functions
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 34
Characteristics of Modern Operating Systems
• Multithreading: process is divided into threads that can run concurrently– Thread
• Dispatchable unit of work
• Includes processor context
• executes sequentially and is interruptable
– Process
• A collection of one or more threads and associated system resources
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 35
Characteristics of Modern Operating Systems
• Distributed operating systems– Provide the illusion of a single main memory and single
secondary memory space
– State of the art for distributed operating systems lags that of uniprocessor and SMP operating systems
• Object-oriented design– Facilitates adding modular extensions to a small kernel
– Enables programmers to customize an operating system without disrupting system integrity
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 36
Windows 2000 (W2K): Brief History
• MS-DOS and PC-DOS– DOS 1.0 released in 1981 had 4,000 lines of assembly
source code, ran in 8Kbytes of memory on a 8086
– DOS 2.0 in 1983 ran on the IBM hard-disk based PC XT with 24Kbytes of memory resident OS
• Support for hard disk
• Hierarchical directories
• UNIX-like features: I/O redirection and background printing
– DOS 3.0 in 1984 ran on the PC AT (80286) with 36Kbytes
– DOS 3.1, also in 1984, provided support for PC networking
– DOS 3.3, in 1987 ran on IBM PS/2 with 46Kbytes
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 37
Windows 2000 (W2K): Brief History
• Need for a new operating system– MS-DOS/PC-DOS did not use the full capabilities of the
evolving processors: 80286, 80386, 80486 and then Pentium (e.g., extended addressing, memory protection)
– To compete with Macintosh, in 1990 Microsoft developed a graphical user interface (GUI), Windows 3.0, that had to run on top of DOS
• Microsoft and IBM attempt to jointly develop a common operating system; attempt fails; IBM develops OS/2 (multitasking, multithreaded), Microsoft develops Windows NT
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 38
Windows 2000 (W2K): Brief History
• Windows NT– NT 3.1 released in 1993
• 32-bit operating system with ability to support older DOS and Windows applications, as well as provide OS/2 support
• Same GUI as Windows 3.1
– NT 3.x, several versions– NT 4.0
• Same internal architecture as 3.x• Same user interface as Windows 98• Several graphics components moved to NT Executive (kernel mode)
• Windows 2000 (W2K)– Same Executive and microkernel architecture as NT 4.0– New services and functions in support of distributed processing– W2K Professional vs. W2K Server
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 39
Single-User and Multi-User Multitasking
• W2K (like OS/2 and MacOS) was design to exploit the capabilities of 32-bit microprocessors to meet the increasing needs of new applications
• Motivations for multitasking– Applications have become more complex and interrelated
(e.g., use of a word processor, a drawing program, and a spreadsheet application simultaneously for a document)
– Growth of client/server computing: system needs to support user interaction concurrently with inter-processor communication
• W2K Professional supports single-user multitasking, while W2K Server supports multi-user multitasking
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 40
Windows 2000 Architecture
• Modular structure for flexibility
• Executes on a variety of hardware platforms
• Supports application written for a variety of other operating system
• Currently, W2K is only implemented on the Pentium/x86 platform
• Separates application-oriented software from operating system software– OS software includes the Executive, the microkernel, device drivers, and
the hardware abstraction layer and runs in kernel mode (access to system data and to hardware)
– Application software runs in user mode and has limited access to user data
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 41
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 42
OS Organization
• Modified microkernel architecture– Not a pure microkernel: Many system functions outside of
the microkernel run in kernel mode (reason: performance)
• Highly modular structure– Each system function is managed by just one component of
the OS: the rest of the OS and all applications access that component using a standard interface
– Key system data can only be accessed through the appropriate function
– Any module can be removed, upgraded, or replaced without rewriting the entire system
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 43
OS Organization – Layered Structure• Hardware Abstraction Layer (HAL): Maps between generic hardware
commands and responses and those unique to a specific platform• Microkernel: Consists of the most used and most fundamental components of
the OS. Manages thread scheduling, process switching, exception and interrupt handling, and multiprocessor synchronization. It does not run in threads: not preemptable nor pageable
• Device Drivers: File system and hardware device drivers that translate user I/O function calls into specific hardware device I/O requests
• I/O Manager: Dispatches requests to appropriate device drivers• Object Manager: Creates, manages, and deletes Executive objects• Security reference monitor: Enforces access-validation and audit-generation
rules• Process/thread manager: Creates/deletes objects and tracks process and
thread objects• Local Procedure Call (LPC) Facility: Enforces client/server relationship
between applications and executive subsystems within a single system
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 44
OS Organization – Layered Structure Cont.)
• Virtual memory manager: Maps virtual addresses in process’s address space to physical pages in memory
• Cache manager: Improves performance of file-based I/O (read from cache, defer write)
• Windows/graphics modules: Creates the windows-oriented screen interface and manages the graphics devices
• User processes:
– Special system support processes: Services not included in W2K (e.g., logon process)
– Server processes: Other W2K services (e.g., event logger)
– Environment subsystems: Supported subsystems are Win32, Posix, and OS/2
– User applications: Can be of five types Win32, Posix, OS/2, Windows 3.1 or MS-DOS
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 45
Client/Server Model
• Operation:– A client (e.g., application program or another OS module) requests a
service by sending a message
– Message routed through the Executive to appropriate server
– Server performs requested operation and returns results or status with another message
– Message routed through Executive back to client
• Advantages of client/server architecture:– Simplifies the Executive: possible to construct a variety of APIs
– Improves reliability: clients cannot not directly access hardware
– Provides a uniform means fro applications to communicate via LPC
– Provides base for distributed computing
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 46
Threads and SMP
• W2K features that support threads and SMP:– OS routines can run on any available processor and different
routines can execute simultaneously on different processors
– Multiple threads of execution within a single process may execute on different processors simultaneously
– Server processes may use multiple threads to process requests from many clients simultaneously
– W2K provides mechanisms for sharing data and resources between processes and flexible interprocess communication capabilities
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 47
UNIX• Brief history (cont.)
– First widely available version outside Bell Labs was Version 6, in 1976
– Version 7, released in in 1978, is the ancestor of modern UNIX systems
– Most important non-AT&T development done at U. of C. at Berkeley, called UNIX BSD, running first on PDP, then VAX
– In 1982, Bell Labs combined several AT&T versions into a system marketed as UNIX System III
– A number of new features were developed to produce UNIX System V
– Traditional UNIX systems: System V Release 3 (SVR3), 4.3BSD
• Traditional UNIX system characteristics:– Hardware is surrounded by the operating-system called kernel
– UNIX comes with a number of user services and interfaces (I.e., shell, other interface software, and the components of the C compiler)
– Runs on a single processor and has limited protection capabilities
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 48
UNIX
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 49
Modern UNIX Systems
• System V Release 4 (SVR4)– Developed jointly by AT&T and Sun Microsystems, combined features
from SVR3, 4.3BSD, Microsoft Xenix System V, and SunOS– New features: real-time processing support, process scheduling classes,
dynamically allocated data structures, virtual memory management, virtual file system, and a preemptive kernel
– Runs on machines ranging from 32-bit microprocessors up to supercomputers
• Solaris 2.x– Sun’s SVR4-based UNIX release– Provides a number of advanced features: fully preemptable, multithreaded
kernel, full support for SMP, and an object-oriented interface to file systems– Is is the most widely used and most successful commercial UNIX
implementation
• 4.4BSD• Linux
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 50
Modern UNIX Systems (Cont.)
• 4.4BSD– Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD) series of UNIX
releases has played a key role in the development of OS theory
– Most enhancements to UNIX first appeared in BSD versions
– 4.xBSD is widely used in academic installations and has served as the basis of a number of commercial UNIX products
– 4.4BSD is the final version of BSD to be released by Berkeley and includes a new virtual memory system and changes in the kernel structure
• Linux
CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems 51
Modern UNIX Systems (Cont.)
• Linux– Started as a UNIX variant for the IBM PC architecture written by Linus
Torvalds and posted on Internet in 1991
– A large number of collaborators contributed to the development of Linux under the control of Torvalds
– Linux is free and the source code is available under the auspices of the Free Software Foundation (FSF)
– Today, Linux is a full-featured UNIX system running on a variety of platforms
– Linux key advantages:
• Modular structure: kernel organized as a collection of loadable modules; a module can be loaded and linked into the kernel while the kernel is in memory and executing
• With source code available, vendors can tweak applications and utilities to meet specific requirements