Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record … 216546.pdf · 2015-03-09 ·...
Transcript of Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record … 216546.pdf · 2015-03-09 ·...
Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # 216546
Record of Site Condition
Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act
Summary
Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence
This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has
access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings
with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental
condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.
Contents of this Record of Site Condition
This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from
the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been
submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.
Record of Site Condition Number 216546Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2015/03/09Certification Date 2014/11/25Current Property Use IndustrialIntended Property Use ResidentialCertificate of Property Use Number No CPUApplicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard,
with Potable Ground Water, Medium and FineTextured Soil, for Residential property use
Property Municipal Address 55 ISABELLA STREET SOUTH, ST. JACOBS,ON, N0B 2N0
1 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 216546 on 2015/03/09
PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS
Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC
Owner Name 1021389 ONTARIO INC.
Authorized Person ARNOLD SAUDER
Mailing Address RR# 11005 REITZEL PLACE, ST. JACOBSONTARIO, CANADA
Postal Code N0B 2N0
Phone (519) 664-2633
Fax
Email Address [email protected]
2 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 216546 on 2015/03/09
RSC Property Location Information
Municipal Address(es) 55 ISABELLA STREET SOUTH, ST. JACOBS, ON N0B 2N0
Municipality Woolwich
Legal Description See Attached Lawyer’s Letter
Assessment Roll Number(s)
302902000322600
Property Identifier Number(s)
22235-0126 (LT)
RSC Property Geographical References
Coordinate System UTM
Datum NAD 83
Zone 17
Easting 535,876.00
Northing 4,820,632.00
RSC Property Use Information
The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.
Current Property Use Industrial
Intended Property Use Residential
Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section 168.6 of the EPA
No
3 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 216546 on 2015/03/09
Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC
The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank
4 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 216546 on 2015/03/09
PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONSQualified Person's Information
Name BRETON LEMIEUX
Type of Membership Under the Professional Geoscientists Act
Practising Member
Membership Number 0221
QP Employer Name BLUEWATER GEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS INC.
Mailing Address 42 SHADYRIDGE PLACE, KITCHENERONTARIO, N2N 3J1 CANADA
Phone (519) 744-4123
Fax (519) 744-1863
Email Address [email protected]
Municipal Information
Local or Single-Tier Municipality
Woolwich
Upper-Tier Municipality Waterloo
Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office
District Office Guelph District Office
District Office Address 1 Stone Road W., Guelph ON N1G 4Y2
5 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 216546 on 2015/03/09
Phase One Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing
The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)
(YYYY/MM/DD)
2014-09-15
Type of Report
Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)
Author of Report
Name of ConsultingCompany
P1 ESA Phase One ESA, 49 and 55 Isabella Street South, St. Jacobs, Ontario
2014-10-30 Breton Lemieux, P.Geo., QP
BLUEWATER GEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS INC.
Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment
Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)
Author of Report
Name of ConsultingCompany
N/A
6 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 216546 on 2015/03/09
Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing
The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)
(YYYY/MM/DD)
2014-11-25
Type of Report
Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)
Author of Report
Name of ConsultingCompany
P2 ESA Phase Two ESA, 55 Isabella Street South, St. Jacobs, Ontario 2015-01-07 Breton Lemieux, P.Geo., QP
BLUEWATER GEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS INC.
Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment
Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD).
Author of Report
Name of ConsultingCompany
N/A
7 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 216546 on 2015/03/09
Environmental ConditionSection 41 applies? No
Section 43.1 applies? No
Site Condition InformationCertification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2014/11/25
Total area of RSC property (in hectares) 0.08400
Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property
Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property
Soil Texture Medium and Fine
Assessment/Restoration Approach Full Depth Generic
Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Yes
Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04?
Yes
Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under the property which is used in the RSC?
Yes
Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or sediment
ALS LABORATORY GROUP
Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Potable
Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 2
8 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 216546 on 2015/03/09
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
1 Acetone < 0.5 28 µg/g
2 Bromomethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
3 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.05 0.12 µg/g
4 Chlorobenzene < 0.05 2.7 µg/g
5 Chloroform < 0.05 0.18 µg/g
6 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.05 1.7 µg/g
7 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < 0.05 6 µg/g
8 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < 0.05 0.097 µg/g
9 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.05 25 µg/g
10 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.05 0.6 µg/g
11 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
12 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
13 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.05 2.5 µg/g
14 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.05 0.75 µg/g
15 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.085 µg/g
16 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.05 0.081 µg/g
17 Ethylene dibromide < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
18 Hexane (n) < 0.05 34 µg/g
19 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 0.5 44 µg/g
20 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 0.5 4.3 µg/g
21 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.05 1.4 µg/g
22 Methylene Chloride < 0.05 0.96 µg/g
23 Styrene < 0.05 2.2 µg/g
24 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
25 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
26 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.05 2.3 µg/g
27 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.05 3.4 µg/g
28 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
29 Trichloroethylene < 0.05 0.52 µg/g
30 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.05 5.8 µg/g
31 Vinyl Chloride < 0.02 0.022 µg/g
32 Bromodichloromethane < 0.05 1.9 µg/g
33 Bromoform < 0.05 0.26 µg/g
34 Dibromochloromethane < 0.05 2.9 µg/g
35 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 5 65 µg/g
...Continued on next page
9 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 216546 on 2015/03/09
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil
Continued from previous page....
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
36 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 10 150 µg/g
37 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 < 50 1300 µg/g
38 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < 50 5600 µg/g
39 Antimony < 1 7.5 µg/g
40 Arsenic 3.5 18 µg/g
41 Selenium < 1 2.4 µg/g
42 Barium 70.1 390 µg/g
43 Beryllium < 0.5 5 µg/g
44 Boron (total) 10.3 120 µg/g
45 Cadmium < 0.5 1.2 µg/g
46 Chromium Total 16.2 160 µg/g
47 Cobalt 6.6 22 µg/g
48 Copper 14.6 180 µg/g
49 Lead 15.9 120 µg/g
50 Molybdenum < 1 6.9 µg/g
51 Nickel 13.8 130 µg/g
52 Silver < 0.2 25 µg/g
53 Thallium < 0.5 1 µg/g
54 Uranium < 1 23 µg/g
55 Vanadium 26.2 86 µg/g
56 Zinc 63.5 340 µg/g
57 Benzene < 0.02 0.17 µg/g
58 Ethylbenzene < 0.05 1.6 µg/g
59 Toluene < 0.2 6 µg/g
60 Xylene Mixture 0.05 25 µg/g
10 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 216546 on 2015/03/09
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)
Ground Water
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
1 Acetone 44 2700 µg/L
2 Bromomethane < 0.5 0.89 µg/L
3 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 5 µg/L
4 Chlorobenzene < 0.5 30 µg/L
5 Chloroform < 1 22 µg/L
6 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.5 3 µg/L
7 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < 0.5 59 µg/L
8 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < 0.5 1 µg/L
9 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 2 590 µg/L
10 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.5 5 µg/L
11 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.5 5 µg/L
12 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.5 14 µg/L
13 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.5 17 µg/L
14 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.5 17 µg/L
15 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.5 5 µg/L
16 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.3 0.5 µg/L
17 Ethylene dibromide < 0.2 0.2 µg/L
18 Hexane (n) < 0.5 520 µg/L
19 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 20 1800 µg/L
20 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 20 640 µg/L
21 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 2 15 µg/L
22 Methylene Chloride < 5 50 µg/L
23 Styrene < 0.5 5.4 µg/L
24 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.5 1.1 µg/L
25 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.5 1 µg/L
26 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.5 17 µg/L
27 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.05 200 µg/L
28 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.05 5 µg/L
29 Trichloroethylene < 0.05 5 µg/L
30 Trichlorofluoromethane < 5 150 µg/L
31 Vinyl Chloride < 0.5 1.7 µg/L
32 Bromodichloromethane < 2 16 µg/L
33 Bromoform < 5 25 µg/L
34 Dibromochloromethane < 2 25 µg/L
35 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 25 750 µg/L
...Continued on next page
11 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 216546 on 2015/03/09
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)
Ground Water
Continued from previous page....
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
36 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 100 150 µg/L
37 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 < 250 500 µg/L
38 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < 250 500 µg/L
39 Acenaphthene < 0.02 4.1 µg/L
40 Acenaphthylene < 0.02 1 µg/L
41 Anthracene < 0.02 2.4 µg/L
42 Benz[a]anthracene < 0.02 1 µg/L
43 Benzo[a]pyrene < 0.01 0.01 µg/L
44 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < 0.02 0.1 µg/L
45 Benzo[ghi]perylene < 0.02 0.2 µg/L
46 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < 0.02 0.1 µg/L
47 Chrysene 0.028 0.1 µg/L
48 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.02 0.2 µg/L
49 Fluoranthene < 0.02 0.41 µg/L
50 Fluorene < 0.02 120 µg/L
51 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < 0.02 0.2 µg/L
52 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < 0.028 3.2 µg/L
53 Naphthalene < 0.05 11 µg/L
54 Phenanthrene < 0.02 1 µg/L
55 Pyrene < 0.02 4.1 µg/L
56 Sodium 490,000 490000 µg/L
57 Antimony < 0.5 6 µg/L
58 Arsenic < 1 25 µg/L
59 Selenium < 5 10 µg/L
60 Barium 195 1000 µg/L
61 Beryllium < 0.5 4 µg/L
62 Boron (total) 65 5000 µg/L
63 Cadmium < 0.1 2.7 µg/L
64 Chromium Total 0.77 50 µg/L
65 Cobalt 0.66 3.8 µg/L
66 Copper 2.3 87 µg/L
67 Lead < 1 10 µg/L
68 Molybdenum 38.7 70 µg/L
69 Nickel 3.1 100 µg/L
70 Silver < 0.1 1.5 µg/L
...Continued on next page
12 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 216546 on 2015/03/09
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)
Ground Water
Continued from previous page....
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
71 Thallium < 0.3 2 µg/L
72 Uranium 3.2 20 µg/L
73 Vanadium 1.11 6.2 µg/L
74 Zinc 11.8 1100 µg/L
75 Benzene < 0.5 5 µg/L
76 Ethylbenzene < 0.5 2.4 µg/L
77 Toluene < 0.5 24 µg/L
78 Xylene Mixture < 0.05 300 µg/L
13 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 216546 on 2015/03/09
Remedial Action and Mitigation
Remediated Soils
Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.
Soil Remediation Process Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)
Description of Remediation
Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property.
Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned
Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.
Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)
Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³)
Soil Brought to the Property
Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.
Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property(in-ground volume in m³)
14 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 216546 on 2015/03/09
Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures
Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing.
Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date.
Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.
Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres)
15 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 216546 on 2015/03/09
Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures
Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.
Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.
Monitoring or Maintenance
Soil Management Measures
Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.
Ground Water Management Measures
Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.
Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary
Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation?
No
16 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 216546 on 2015/03/09
Qualified Person’s Statements and CertificationsAs the qualified person, I certify that:
A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.
As of 2014/11/25, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC.
Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
As of 2014/11/25, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 36 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment.
As of 2014/11/25, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards.
I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.
I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.
I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry.
The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.
I do not hold and have not held and my employer BLUEWATER GEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS INC.does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessmentor risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based
To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are true as of 2014/11/25.
By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.
By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, BRETON LEMIEUX, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/01/20:
a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.
I Agree
17 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 216546 on 2015/03/09
Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or AgentThe following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Changeas part of the record of site condition
Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner
Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property
Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired
A Current plan of Survey
Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern
Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property
Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model
Owner or agent certification statements
5.2.6
18 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 216546 on 2015/03/09
19 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 216546 on 2015/03/09
Request ID: 017188943 Province of Ontario Date Report Produced: 2015/01/05Demande n° : Province de l'Ontario Document produit le :Transaction ID: 56379655 Ministry of Government Services Time Report Produced: 13:44:29Transaction n° : Ministère des Services gouvernementaux Imprimé à :Category ID: CTCatégorie :
CERTIFICATE OF STATUSATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE
This is to certify that according to the D'après les dossiers du Ministère desrecords of the Ministry of Government Services gouvernementaux, nous attestonsServices que la société
1 0 2 1 3 8 9 O N T A R I O I N C .
Ontario Corporation Number Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario)
0 0 1 0 2 1 3 8 9
is a corporation incorporated, est une société constituée, prorogée ou néeamalgamated or continued under d'une fusion aux termes des lois de lathe laws of the Province of Ontario. Province de l'Ontario.
The corporation came into existence on La société a été fondée le
M A Y 1 8 M A I , 1 9 9 3
and has not been dissolved. et n'est pas dissoute.
Dated Fait le
J A N U A R Y 0 5 J A N V I E R , 2 0 1 5
DirectorDirecteur
The issuance of this certifcate in electronic form is authorized by the Ministry of Government Services.
La délivrance du présent certificat sous forme électronique est autorisée par le Ministère des Services gouvernementaux.
AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN 55 Isabella Street South, St. Jacobs, ON
Area of Potential
Environmental Concern
1
Location of APEC on
Phase One Property
Potentially Contaminating
Activity2
Location of PCA
(on-Site or off-Site)
Contaminants of
Potential Concern
3
Media Potentially Impacted
(Groundwater, Soil, Sediment)
APEC-1: Historical
commercial autobody repair
Former auto body shop
operations at 55 Isabella
Street South
PCA 10: Commercial Autobody Repair (MOE PCA #10)
On-Site: former
autobody repairs at 55
Isabella Street South
PHC, VOC, metals
Soil and Groundwater
APEC-2: Former AST for
fuel storage
Furnace room of building at 55 Isabella
Street South
PCA 28: Gasoline and Associated Products
Storage in Fixed Tanks (MOE PCA
#28)
On-Site: former AST at
55 Isabella Street South
PHC, BTEX Soil and
Groundwater
APEC-3: Operation of rail car repair
facility
Western boundary of
Site
PCA 27: Garages and Maintenance and Repair of Railcars,
Marine Vehicles and Aviation Vehicles (MOE PCA #27)
Off-site: Rail car repair at 50 Isabella Street South
PHC, BTEX, PAH, VOC,
metals Groundwater
APEC-4: Operation of rail line and
yard
Western boundary of
Site
PCA 46: Rail Yards, Tracks and Spurs (MOE PCA #46)
Off-Site: Rail line and yards at 50
Isabella Street South
PHC, BTEX, PAH, VOC,
Metals Groundwater
APEC 5: Plastics
processing facility
Western and northern
boundaries of Site
PCA 43: Plastics Manufacturing and Processing (MOE
PCA # 43)
Off-Site: Plastics
processing at 46 Isabella
Street South
VOC Groundwater
Notes: 1 - Area of Potential Environmental Concern means the area on, in or under a phase one property where one or more contaminants are potentially present, as determined through the phase one environmental site assessment, including through, (a) identification of past or present uses on, in or under the phase one property, and
(b) identification of potentially contaminating activity. 2 - Potentially Contaminating Activity means a use or activity set out in Column A of Table 2 of Schedule D that is occurring or has occurred in a Phase one study area 3 - when completing this column, identify all contaminants of potential concern using the Method Groups as identified in the "Protocol for in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, March 9, 2004, amended as of July 1, 2011, as specified below: Metals; PAHs; VOCs; BTEX; PHCs
TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY 55 Isabella Street South, St. Jacobs, ON
Year Name of Owner Description of
Property Use Property Use
1
Other Observations (Aerial
Photographs, Fire Insurance
Plans, Etc.)
1893-1916
E.W.B. Snider Jacob Snider
Agriculture or other use
Agriculture or other use
Area in agricultural use (Source: Chain-of-Title search)
1916 -1917
A.R. Gies Agriculture
or other use Agriculture or
other use
Area in agricultural use (Source: Chain-of-Title search, 1904 FIP, interviews, aerial photographs)
1917-1928
H.W. Weber Vacant,
undeveloped Agriculture or
other use
Site undeveloped. Area in agricultural, commercial, industrial
and residential use (Source: Chain-of-Title search, interviews, aerial photographs)
1928 - 1947
E. Brubacher Vacant,
undeveloped Agriculture or
other use
Site undeveloped (Source: Chain-of-Title search, interviews, aerial photographs)
1947 - 1974
W. Sauder, K. Dunn
(trustee, 1974)
Vacant, undeveloped until
1973/1974
Agriculture or other use
Site undeveloped until early 1970’s (Source: Chain-of-Title search, interviews, aerial photographs)
1974 - 1975
L. Stadelbauer, J. Stadelbauer,
K. Lazenby, M. Lazenby
Site building constructed circa 1973/74, used for
wooden ladder maker
Industrial
Site developed with current industrial building
(Source: Chain-of-Title search, interviews, aerial photographs)
1975 -1977
E. Cook, R. Miller
Site building used for wooden ladder
maker Industrial
Site developed with current industrial building
(Source: Chain-of-Title search, interviews, aerial photographs)
1977 - 1978
H. Wiebe Site building used for wooden ladder
maker Industrial
Site developed with current industrial building
(Source: Chain-of-Title search, interviews, aerial photographs)
1979 - 1981
P. Geil Site building used for wooden ladder
maker Industrial
Site developed with current industrial building
(Source: Chain-of-Title search, interviews, aerial photographs)
1981 - 1993
K. Lazenby,
Site building used for wooden ladder
maker and and storage
Industrial
Site developed with current industrial building
(Source: Chain-of-Title search, interviews, building and planning
records, aerial photographs)
1993 -present
1021389 Ontario Inc.
Site building used for various tenant
commercial operations and
storage incl. autobody repairs
Industrial
Site developed with current industrial building (Source: Chain-of-Title search, interviews, building and
planning records, aerial photographs)
Bluewater Geoscience Consultants Inc. was retained by the property owner Mr. Arnold Sauder
of 1021389 Ontario Inc. to complete a Phase Two ESA of the RSC property located at 55
Isabella Street South in St. Jacobs, Ontario. The Phase Two CSM is developed as part of the
Phase Two ESA and updates the Phase One CSM developed prior to undertaking the Phase
Two ESA. The Phase Two CSM is detailed below and is supported by the following Figures
appended:
Figure 1 - Site and PCA/APEC Location Plan - provides the relative location of the RSC
property in St. Jacobs and the location of on-site and off-site PCA within the Phase One Study
Area;
Figure 2 – Site Plan - presents the portions of the RSC property potentially affected by APEC 1-
5 as well as the location of the former heating oil AST related to APEC 2;
Figure 3 – Borehole/Monitoring Well Location Plan - provides the borehole/monitoring well
locations relative to site features and APEC;
Figure 4 - Groundwater Flow Plan - provides the monitoring well locations, determined
groundwater elevations and on-site groundwater flow pattern;
Figure 5 – Cross Sections - presents geologic cross sections in directions parallel and
perpendicular to the determined groundwater flow direction. The cross sections present the
encountered stratigraphy, well installation details and groundwater levels for the Phase Two
property
The Phase Two property is not located in close proximity to any ANSI, environmentally sensitive
areas, does not contain shallow bedrock (< 2m) or surface water bodies which may apply to the
selection of the applicable SCS. Lab analysis of site soils pH levels confirm that the soil is within
the range of 5 to 11 for surface soil and 5 – 9 for subsurface soils required by the MOE.
The RSC property is located in an area of predominantly residential land use with some nearby
commercial and institutional uses. The RSC property currently has one single-storey Site
building used for small scale bicycle repairs. The proposed site redevelopment is for potential
residential usage however no specific plans have been developed for the Site.
The Site is legally described as “Lot 19 Registrars Compiled Plan 1549, Township of Woolwich,
Regional Municipality of Waterloo”.
Based on information provided in the Regional Municipality of Waterloo’s online GIS Locator
(http://maps.region.waterloo.on.ca/locator/locator.htm) and provided tax bills, the Municipal
Assessment Roll Number for the Site is 302902000322600; and the Property Identification
Number (PIN) for the Site is 222350126.
The geo-referencing coordinates for the approximate centre of the Site are:
Latitude/Longitude: Latitude: 43˚ 32′ 16″ North, Longitude: 80˚ 33′ 22″ West;
UTM Coordinates: Zone 17 535876E, 4820632N;
OBM Topographic Map Sheet Number: 5350/48200, scale 1:10,000, dated 1983
Areas Where Potentially Contaminating Activities Have Occurred and Determination of
APEC
A Phase One ESA was conducted by Bluewater (“Phase One ESA, 49 and 55 Isabella Street
South, St. Jacobs” dated November 2014) which determined that two historic PCA have been
undertaken on the RSC property and three off-site PCA have been conducted within the Phase
One study area. All five identified PCA have been considered to have the potential to create
APEC on the RSC property. The location of the RSC property as well as the location of on-site
and off-site PCA is shown on Figure 1. The portions of the RSC property potentially affected by
these PCA (on-site APEC 1 - 5) are shown on Figure 2. A description of each of the five
determined APEC and the PCA associated are summarized below. The APEC identified during
this assessment includes the following:
APEC 1 – Historical On-Site Commercial Autobody Shops: The historical operations at
55 Isabella Street South included several on-Site auto body repair and automotive
painting businesses from approximately the 1970’s to 1990’s. These businesses were
reported to operate within the Site building at 55 Isabella. (‘Commercial Autobody Shops’
are listed as PCA # 10 in Table 2 of Schedule D of Ont. Reg. 153/04, as amended).
These autobody repair activities were very small scale and part-time operations
undertaken within the on-site building (Figure 2). The 240 m2 building has slab on grade
construction and does not contain a basement or any floor drains, sumps, pits, trenches,
in-ground hydraulic hoists or oil/water separators. The site is connected to the municipal
sanitary sewer system but only the bathroom facilities outlet to the system. Painting
activities were reported to consist of only ‘touch-up’ work, an actual formal spray booth
was not present. The site is not listed on any of the MOE databases however the
undertaking of autobody repairs may have included the small scale use of solvents,
hydrocarbons and may have created the potential for soil and groundwater impacts
related to these COC as well as heavy metals. Despite the small-scale nature of these
operations, any on-site PCA is considered an APEC and therefore this PCA was treated
as an APEC covering the entire site. BH/MW’s 1, 2 and 3 (Figure 3) were completed to
assess this PCA/APEC;
APEC 2 - Historical On-Site Fuel Storage: Prior to the installation of the current natural-
gas fired furnace, the Site building at 55 Isabella Street South historically was serviced
by an above-ground storage tank (AST) for furnace oil storage to supply the former oil-
fired furnace heating the building. (‘Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed
Tanks’ is listed as PCA # 28 in Table 2 of Schedule D of Ont. Reg. 153/04, as
amended). The site is not listed on any of the MOE databases and TSSA have no
records related to the property. This AST was historically removed, and was previously
located outside near the furnace room in the central portion of the north wall of the Site
building (Figure 2) at the RSC property. This on-site PCA creates the potential for impact
from BTEX and PHC parameters to soil and groundwater in the vicinity of the former
AST. BH/MW-1 (Figure 3) was completed to assess this PCA/APEC;
APEC 3 - Off-Site Repair of Railway Locomotives: The property located at 50 Isabella
Street South is occupied by the Waterloo Central Railway, and since 2009 has operated
a facility for the repair and restoration of railway locomotives. (‘Garages and
Maintenance and Repair of Railcars, Marine Vehicles and Aviation Vehicles’ is listed as
PCA # 27 in Table 2 of Schedule D of Ont. Reg. 153/04, as amended). This PCA is
located approximately 60 m west of the Site (Figure 1), and is situated topographically
cross-gradient relative to the Site. The off-site locomotive repair operation is not
registered on any of the MOE databases however an operation of this nature creates the
potential for impacts to groundwater on the RSC property should significant releases of
liquid products occur on that property. These contaminants could then migrate with the
groundwater and potentially impact the RSC property. While the potential for impact to
the RSC property from this off-site PCA is considered low, in order to provide a thorough
and conservative assessment of the environmental conditions it was considered an
APEC on the western portion of the RSC property. This off-site PCA creates the
potential for on-site groundwater impacts from the COC of BTEX, VOC, PHC, PAH and
Metals. BH/MW’s 1 and 2 (Figure 3) were completed to assess this PCA/APEC;
APEC 4 - Off-Site Rail Yards, Tracks and Spurs: The property located at 50 Isabella
Street South (Figure 1) has contained railway tracks from the late 1800’s to the present
day. Historical rail yard operations also operated from approximately 1896 until 2003.
(‘Rail Yards, Tracks and Spurs’ are listed as PCA # 46 in Table 2 of Schedule D of Ont.
Reg. 153/04, as amended). This PCA is located approximately 40 to 70 m west of the
Site, and is situated topographically up to cross-gradient relative to the Site. The rail
yards, tracks and spurs were not included in any of the MOE databases however an
operation of this nature creates the potential for impacts to groundwater on the RSC
property should significant releases of liquid products occur on that property. These
contaminants could then migrate with the groundwater and potentially impact the RSC
property. While the potential for impact to the RSC property from this off-site PCA is
considered low, in order to provide a thorough and conservative assessment of the
environmental conditions it was considered an APEC on the western portion of the RSC
property (Figure 2). This PCA creates the potential for on-site groundwater impacts from
the COC of BTEX, VOC, PHC, PAH and Metals. BH/MW’s 1 and 2 (Figure 3) were
completed to assess this PCA/APEC;
APEC 5 - Off-Site Plastics Processing: The property located at 46 Isabella Street South
contains a facility for plastics processing. (‘Plastics Manufacturing and Processing’ is
listed as PCA # 43 in Table 2 of Schedule D of Ont. Reg. 153/04, as amended). This
PCA is located approximately 35 m northwest of the Site (Figure 1), and is situated
topographically down to cross-gradient relative to the Site. The property was listed as an
MOE-registered waste generator from 2003-2004. Information on the nature of the waste
generated was not provided however an operation of this nature may use small
quantities of solvents. This creates the potential for impacts to groundwater on the RSC
property should significant releases of liquid products occur on that property. These
contaminants could then migrate with the groundwater and potentially impact the RSC
property. While the potential for impact to the RSC property from this off-site PCA is
considered low, in order to provide a thorough and conservative assessment of the
environmental conditions it was considered an APEC on the western portion of the RSC
property (Figure 2). This PCA creates the potential for on-site groundwater impacts from
the COC of VOC as these may be used in small quantities on the off-PCA site. BH/MW’s
1 and 2 (Figure 3) were completed to assess this PCA/APEC;
Physical Setting of the Phase Two Property
The subject property is located one lot south of the southeast corner of the intersection of
Isabella Street South and Cedar Street West in St. Jacobs, Ontario (Figure 1). Isabella St. S.
runs along the west side (inferred) of the property and a vacant lot located at 49 Isabella St. S.
forms the north side Site boundary. There are residential properties to the east of the RSC
property and a school is located adjacent to the south of the RSC property. The terrain of the
Site is relatively flat, with a slight slope to the northeast. Surface water drainage is overland
towards Cedar Street where storm water sewers are located.
The flat portions of the property are at a geodetic elevation of ~339.9 – 340.2 m amsl. There is
currently one single-storey light industrial building constructed in 1973 located on the RSC
property. It is believed this is the only building to have ever been located on the property. The
on-site building is currently used for small scale bicycle repairs and leather work. There are no
surface water bodies or ANSI located within the Phase One study area.
Topographic maps indicate that the Site is located at an elevation of approximately 340 m
above mean sea level. The Site and area slope gently to the north-northeast towards the
Conestogo River, located approximately 370 m to the north of the Site. A rail line is located to
the southwest, across Isabella Street.
Based on the general topography of the Site and surrounding area, the near-surface
groundwater flow is anticipated to be to the north-northeast, following the local topographic
gradient, towards the Conestogo River. No surficial water ponding was observed at the time of
inspection.
According to Chapman and Putnam in the Physiography of Southern Ontario, The Village of St.
Jacobs is situated on a till moraine known as the physiographic region of Waterloo Hills.
Though most of the area is characterized by sandy hills, kames, and moraines, there are till
plains and moraines that contain higher concentrations of silty till which inhibit groundwater flow
and are characterized by broad swampy valleys. According to soils and bedrock mapping, the
native geology in the vicinity of the Site (i.e., underlying any imported fill materials) is expected
to comprise glacially deposited sands and gravels, overlying sandy silt till deposits.
Bedrock in the vicinity of the Site is expected to be Limestone and Dolostone of the Guelph-
Amabel Formation, underlain at depth by Queenston Formation Shales. Bedrock mapping
suggests that bedrock is encountered at depths of 30 m or greater within the study area.
Site Stratigraphy
The Stratigraphy and groundwater conditions encountered in the boreholes were documented in
the field by Bluewater personnel. Figure 3 shows the locations of the boreholes and monitoring
wells installed during the Phase Two ESA. The stratigraphy encountered consisted of surficial
topsoil ranging in depth from 0.6 m at BH/MW-1 to 0.15 m at BH/MW-2. Beneath the topsoil was
encountered native Sand and Gravel, trace to some silt, dense, brown and dry to damp to
depths of 2.1 m (BH/MW-2) to 2.4m (BH/MW-1 and BH/MW-3). Below the Sand and Gravel unit
was encountered at all boreholes native Silt Till, clayey, some sand and gravel, grey, dense and
moist to wet. The Silt till unit extended to the maximum depth investigated of 4.6 m below grade.
Bedrock was not encountered at any borehole location. Figure 5 provides cross sections
through the Phase Two property in directions parallel and perpendicular to the determined
groundwater flow direction and shows the encountered stratigraphy and groundwater monitoring
well installation details.
A total of three (3) boreholes were advanced on the subject property to assess soil and
groundwater conditions. All three of the boreholes were developed as groundwater monitoring
wells. Representative soil samples from each borehole/monitoring well were obtained and
analyzed for the VOC, PHC and Heavy Metals parameters. No elevated soil vapour
concentrations were documented in the soil samples retrieved from the boreholes. Groundwater
samples from the monitoring well were obtained and analyzed for the VOC, PHC, PAH and
Heavy Metals parameters. No indications of the presence of DNAPL or LNAPL were
documented during monitoring completed with an interface probe.
Hydrogeological Characteristics
Groundwater was encountered within the base of the surficial Sand and Gravel and within the
Silt Till units at depths of ~1.9 – 2.1 m below grade on the Phase Two property. Groundwater
was determined to flow towards the northeast (Figure 4). The average hydraulic gradient of the
surficial aquifer was determined to be 0.0875. Groundwater level monitoring completed on two
occasions in November 2014 indicated fluctuations (~0.5 m) in response to large precipitation
events. This information correlates well with information available for other water wells in the
RSC study area. Climatic or Meteorological conditions do not appear to significantly affect
contaminant concentration, distribution or migration.
Groundwater sampling and lab analysis completed during this Phase Two ESA determined that
concentrations of the VOC, PHC, PAH and heavy Metals parameters meet the applicable Table
2 SCS at all sampled locations. Based on this finding, it is demonstrated that the APEC have
not created actual impacts to soil and groundwater at concentrations in excess of the Table 2
SCS. No indications of the presence of DNAPL or LNAPL were documented during monitoring
completed with an interface probe.
All subsurface structures and utilities are located well above the groundwater levels and are
therefore unlikely to affect contaminant distribution or migration. Further, native soils located
within the depths of underground services are coarse grained and therefore would not have
preferential permeability leading to groundwater migration within service trenches.
Approximate Depth to Bedrock
Bedrock was not encountered during site investigations of up to 4.6 m below grade on the
Phase Two property. Bedrock in the vicinity of the Site is expected to be Limestone and
Dolostone of the Guelph-Amabel Formation, underlain at depth by Queenston Formation
Shales. Bedrock mapping suggests that bedrock is encountered at depths of 30 m or greater
within the study area.
Approximate Depth to the Water Table
Shallow groundwater was encountered at all borehole/monitoring well locations. The depth to
shallow groundwater ranged from 1.9 – 2.1 m below grade at the property. This represents
geodetic elevations of 337.655 – 338.195 m asl.
Any respect in which Section 41 or 43.1 of the Regulation Apply to the Property
There are no portions of the site to which Sections 41 or 43 apply.
Areas Where Soil has Been Brought from Another Property and Placed On, In or Under
the Phase Two Property
No soil has been brought to the RSC. No fill has been placed on the RSC property.
Approximate Locations of Any Proposed Buildings
There is one existing ~240 m2 building on the Site (Figure 2) and no evidence of past buildings
on the Site. While residential redevelopment of the Site may be considered, no specific plans or
drawings have been developed.
Contaminants Present at Concentrations Greater than the Applicable SCS
Based on the soil and groundwater sampling and laboratory analysis completed during this
Phase Two ESA, there are no areas where soil and/or groundwater concentrations in excess of
the Table 2 SCS are present. Soil sampling and laboratory analysis for the VOC/PHC and
Metals parameters did not indicate any exceedance of the Table 2 SCS. Groundwater sampling
and laboratory analysis VOC/PHC/Metals and PAH parameters completed at the Phase Two
property did not indicate any exceedance of the Table 2 SCS.
The groundwater sample from BH/MW-2 was determined to contain a concentration of sodium
of 673,000 ug/L in excess of the Table 2 SCS of 490,000 ug/L. This elevated sodium
concentration at this location can be attributed to the placement of de-icing road salt along
Isabella St. S. The snow is then ploughed onto the boulevard between the road and the RSC
property where it can melt and infiltrate into the subsurface. BH/MW-2 is the most upgradient
well on the RSC property and is located immediately downgradient of Isabella St. S. Ont. Reg.
153/04 allows for the elevated sodium concentration on a property if that concentration is
related to placement of de-icing road salt. The elevated sodium concentration in groundwater is
attributed to the use of de-icing agents on the adjacent roadway for the purpose of keeping the
highway safe for traffic under condition of snow or ice or both. As provided under section 2 of
Reg.339 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Classes of Contaminants – Exemptions)
the applicable SCS for sodium in groundwater is deemed not to be exceeded for the purpose of
Part XV.I of the Act. As such, the elevated sodium groundwater concentration is not considered
an exceedance of the Table 2 SCS.
These groundwater results do not indicate that the soil serves as a source of contaminant mass
contributing to groundwater or sediment. The groundwater results do not indicate the potential
presence of LNAPL or DNAPL.
Areas Where Contaminants are Present Above the Table 2 SCS
There are no areas on the RSC property where contaminants are present at concentrations
above the Table 2 SCS. Based on this finding it is clear that none of the five identified APEC
have created actual impact to soil or groundwater at concentrations in excess of the Table 2
SCS.
The Contaminants Associated with each of these Areas and the Medium Affected
No soil or groundwater contaminants are present at concentrations in excess of the Table 2
SCS.
Description and Assessment of Impacted Area and Contaminant Distribution
No soil or groundwater contaminants are present at concentrations in excess of the Table 2
SCS.
Reasons for Discharge of the Contaminants
No soil or groundwater contaminants are present at concentrations in excess of the Table 2
SCS.
Potential for Migration of Contaminants
No soil or groundwater contaminants are present at concentrations in excess of the Table 2
SCS therefore there is no potential for migration of contaminants.
Influence of Climatic or Meteorological Conditions
Climatic or meteorological conditions are highly unlikely to influence contaminant distribution or
migration.
Potential for Soil Vapour Intrusion
As there are no excessive VOC, PHC or PAH parameter concentrations, vapour intrusion is not
an issue on the RSC property.
Release Mechanisms
No contaminant releases have occurred on the RSC property.
Contaminant Transport Pathways
As no excessive soil and/or groundwater concentrations are present on the RSC property,
contaminant pathways are not of concern.
Legend
Phase I ESA Study Area - 250 m radius around subject Site
PCA 10 On Site Historical Commercial Autobody Shops (55 Isabella Street)
PCA 28 On-Site Historical Gasoline and Associated Products
Storage in Fixed Tanks (55 Isabella Street)
PCA 27 Off-Site Garages and Maintenance and Repair of Railcars,
Marine Vehicles and Aviation Vehicles (50 Isabella Street)
PCA 46 Off-Site Rail Yards, Tracks and Spurs (50 Isabella Street)
PCA 43 Off-Site Plastics Manufacturing and Processing (46 Isabella Street)
Identified Land Use
Scale:
200m 0m 100m 200m
Base Plan from ERIS Report, January 2013
Date: Dwn By: Chkd. By: Scale
21/09/2014 WL BJL 1 to 3,000
Site and PCA/APEC Location Plan
Phase Two CSM 49 & 55 Isabella Street South
St. Jacobs, Ontario
Project No. BG-519 Figure 1 42 Shadyridge Place
Kitchener, Ontario
N2N 3J1
Ph: (519) 744-4123
Fax: (519) 744-1863
1
3
4
5
Commercial
Residential and Commercial
Institutional
Industrial and Commercial
Agricultural
Residential
Industrial
Residential and Commercial
4
3 5
1
Commercial
Subject Site (Industrial)
Residential and Commercial
Residential
Industrial
Floodplain (Natural Area)
2
2
BLUEWATERGEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS Inc.
DATE: SCALE:
PROJECT NO: FIGURE NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY: APPROVED BY:
1021389 ONTARIO INC.
PHASE TWO ESA - SITE PLAN
55 ISABELLA STREET SOUTH, ST. JACOBS
2
BG-519
1:200DEC. 3/14
NB
BL
SITE NORTHTRUE NORTH
B
B'
A'
A
BLUEWATERGEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS Inc.
DATE: SCALE:
PROJECT NO: FIGURE NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY: APPROVED BY:
1021389 ONTARIO INC.
PHASE TWO ESA - BOREHOLE/MONITORING
WELL LOCATION PLAN
55 ISABELLA STREET SOUTH, ST. JACOBS
3
BG-519
1:200DEC. 4/14
CF
BL
SITE NORTHTRUE NORTH
B'B
BLUEWATERGEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS Inc.
DATE: SCALE:
PROJECT NO: FIGURE NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY: APPROVED BY:
1021389 ONTARIO INC.
PHASE TWO ESA - GROUNDWATER
FLOW PLAN
55 ISABELLA STREET SOUTH, ST. JACOBS
4
BG-519
1:200DEC. 4/14
CF
BL
SITE NORTHTRUE NORTH
BLUEWATERGEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS Inc.
DATE: SCALE:
PROJECT NO: FIGURE NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY: APPROVED BY:
1021389 ONTARIO INC.
PHASE TWO ESA - CROSS SECTIONS
55 ISABELLA STREET SOUTH, ST. JACOBS
5
BG-519
1:200DEC. 4/14
CF
BL
SITE NORTHTRUE NORTH