On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework
-
Upload
roycekimmons -
Category
Education
-
view
2.160 -
download
1
Transcript of On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework
![Page 1: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework
Royce KimmonsUniversity of Texas at Austin
![Page 2: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
TPACK Model
![Page 3: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Difficulties & Limitations of TPACK for Assessment and Evaluation
1. Fuzziness2. Techno-centrism3. Misapplication of the model
![Page 4: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
[1] Fuzziness
![Page 5: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Evaluating for Fuzziness
• “I can teach lessons that appropriately combine literacy, technologies, and teaching approaches[;]”
• “I can teach lessons that appropriately combine science, technologies, and teaching approaches[;] [...]”
• “I can provide leadership in helping others to coordinate the use of content, technologies, and teaching approaches at my school and/or district” (Schmidt, Baran, Thompson, Mishra, Koehler, & Shin, 2009; emphasis added)
![Page 6: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
[2] Techno-centrism
• Can you have TPACK without T?• Is T always appropriate?• Where are the students in all of this?
Learning?• How does T change the teaching?– R – Replacement– A – Amplification– T – Transformation (Hughes et al., 2006)
![Page 7: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
[3] Misapplication of the Model
![Page 8: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Venn Diagrams as Logical ModelsR + W = WR
TautologicalSufficient & Necessary Causes
![Page 9: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Venn Diagrams as Illustrative Models
A + S = ?Non-Tautological
Merely Necessary Cause
If No A or No S = No PBP
![Page 10: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Various Relationships
![Page 11: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
How do we use PCK & TPACK?Logical ModelTautological
IllustrationNon-Tautologicalvs.
Sufficient & Necessary Cause
Necessary Cause
![Page 12: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
PCK as an Illustration
![Page 13: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Can PCK be a Logical Model?
![Page 14: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Recap
1. Theoretical Models like Venn Diagrams may be used in a Tautological (Logical or Sufficient & Necessary) or a Non-Tautological (Illustrative or Merely Necessary) manner
2. A single diagram may be used in one or both ways if it shows multiple relationships; TPACK includes both types of relationships
![Page 15: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
TPACK Model
![Page 16: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Logical Conversion: Overcomplication
![Page 17: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
TPACK Model
![Page 18: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Assessing for TPACK
![Page 19: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Assessing for TPACK
![Page 20: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Misapplication: Type 1
![Page 21: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Misapplication: Type 2
![Page 22: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Solution: Assess for the Hybrid Domains
![Page 23: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
What’s Missing in Ed Tech?
![Page 24: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Surest Method for Assessing for and Implementing TPACK
![Page 25: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062514/557e8153d8b42acf658b48d2/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Is this a Reasonable Approach?
• Logically implies TPACK• Less fuzzy than attempting to assess for and
implement TPACK directly• Does not sacrifice any inherent complexity of
TPACK
• Is this an unnecessary complication?• Should we even be assessing for TPACK at all?