On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces › ... › 83 › 90 ›...
Transcript of On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces › ... › 83 › 90 ›...
On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compactcomplex spaces
Francesco Bei
Index Theory and Singular StructuresMathematics Institute of Toulouse, 29 May–02 June 2017
June 1, 2017
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
OUTLINECheeger-Goresky-MacPherson’s conjecture andMacPherson’s conjecture.
Setting and main problem.
The Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complexspaces.
Hodge-Kodaira Laplacian on possibly singular surfaces.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
OUTLINECheeger-Goresky-MacPherson’s conjecture andMacPherson’s conjecture.
Setting and main problem.
The Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complexspaces.
Hodge-Kodaira Laplacian on possibly singular surfaces.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
OUTLINECheeger-Goresky-MacPherson’s conjecture andMacPherson’s conjecture.
Setting and main problem.
The Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complexspaces.
Hodge-Kodaira Laplacian on possibly singular surfaces.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
OUTLINECheeger-Goresky-MacPherson’s conjecture andMacPherson’s conjecture.
Setting and main problem.
The Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complexspaces.
Hodge-Kodaira Laplacian on possibly singular surfaces.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Cheeger-Goresky-MacPherson’s Conjecture, 1982
Let V ⊂ CPn be a projective variety and let g be the Kahlermetric induced on reg(V ), the regular part of V , by theFubini-Study metric of CPn.
Then:dk ,max = dk ,min
Hk2 (reg(V ),g) ∼= ImHk (V ,R)
and the previous isomorphism induces a Hodge decompositionof ImHk (V ,R) in terms of L2-Dolbeault-cohomology groups.
This conjecture is still largely open.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Cheeger-Goresky-MacPherson’s Conjecture, 1982
Let V ⊂ CPn be a projective variety and let g be the Kahlermetric induced on reg(V ), the regular part of V , by theFubini-Study metric of CPn.Then:
dk ,max = dk ,min
Hk2 (reg(V ),g) ∼= ImHk (V ,R)
and the previous isomorphism induces a Hodge decompositionof ImHk (V ,R) in terms of L2-Dolbeault-cohomology groups.
This conjecture is still largely open.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Cheeger-Goresky-MacPherson’s Conjecture, 1982
Let V ⊂ CPn be a projective variety and let g be the Kahlermetric induced on reg(V ), the regular part of V , by theFubini-Study metric of CPn.Then:
dk ,max = dk ,min
Hk2 (reg(V ),g) ∼= ImHk (V ,R)
and the previous isomorphism induces a Hodge decompositionof ImHk (V ,R) in terms of L2-Dolbeault-cohomology groups.
This conjecture is still largely open.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Cheeger-Goresky-MacPherson’s Conjecture, 1982
Let V ⊂ CPn be a projective variety and let g be the Kahlermetric induced on reg(V ), the regular part of V , by theFubini-Study metric of CPn.Then:
dk ,max = dk ,min
Hk2 (reg(V ),g) ∼= ImHk (V ,R)
and the previous isomorphism induces a Hodge decompositionof ImHk (V ,R) in terms of L2-Dolbeault-cohomology groups.
This conjecture is still largely open.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Cheeger-Goresky-MacPherson’s Conjecture, 1982
Let V ⊂ CPn be a projective variety and let g be the Kahlermetric induced on reg(V ), the regular part of V , by theFubini-Study metric of CPn.Then:
dk ,max = dk ,min
Hk2 (reg(V ),g) ∼= ImHk (V ,R)
and the previous isomorphism induces a Hodge decompositionof ImHk (V ,R) in terms of L2-Dolbeault-cohomology groups.
This conjecture is still largely open.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
MacPherson’s conjecture, 1983
Conjecture
Let V ⊂ CPn be a complex projective variety, π : V −→ V aresolution of V and let g be the Kahler metric on reg(V )induced by the Fubini-Study metric.Then:
χ2(reg(V ),g) = χ(OV )
whereχ2(reg(V ),g)) =
∑(−1)q dim(H0,q
2,∂(reg(V ),g))
χ(V ) =∑
(−1)q dim(H0,q∂
(V ))
Solved by Pardon and Stern in 1991 proving a stronger result:
H0,q2,∂min
(reg(V ),g) ∼= H0,q∂
(V ), q = 0, ..., v
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
MacPherson’s conjecture, 1983
Conjecture
Let V ⊂ CPn be a complex projective variety, π : V −→ V aresolution of V and let g be the Kahler metric on reg(V )induced by the Fubini-Study metric.Then:
χ2(reg(V ),g) = χ(OV )
whereχ2(reg(V ),g)) =
∑(−1)q dim(H0,q
2,∂(reg(V ),g))
χ(V ) =∑
(−1)q dim(H0,q∂
(V ))
Solved by Pardon and Stern in 1991 proving a stronger result:
H0,q2,∂min
(reg(V ),g) ∼= H0,q∂
(V ), q = 0, ..., v
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
MacPherson’s conjecture, 1983
Conjecture
Let V ⊂ CPn be a complex projective variety, π : V −→ V aresolution of V and let g be the Kahler metric on reg(V )induced by the Fubini-Study metric.Then:
χ2(reg(V ),g) = χ(OV )
whereχ2(reg(V ),g)) =
∑(−1)q dim(H0,q
2,∂(reg(V ),g))
χ(V ) =∑
(−1)q dim(H0,q∂
(V ))
Solved by Pardon and Stern in 1991 proving a stronger result:
H0,q2,∂min
(reg(V ),g) ∼= H0,q∂
(V ), q = 0, ..., v
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Related problems
Existence of self-adjoint extensions of ∆k and ∆∂,p,q withdiscrete sprectrum
Estimates for the growth of the eigenvalues
Properties of the heat operator: trace class, estimates forthe trace etc
Index formulas
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Related problems
Existence of self-adjoint extensions of ∆k and ∆∂,p,q withdiscrete sprectrum
Estimates for the growth of the eigenvalues
Properties of the heat operator: trace class, estimates forthe trace etc
Index formulas
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Related problems
Existence of self-adjoint extensions of ∆k and ∆∂,p,q withdiscrete sprectrum
Estimates for the growth of the eigenvalues
Properties of the heat operator: trace class, estimates forthe trace etc
Index formulas
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Related problems
Existence of self-adjoint extensions of ∆k and ∆∂,p,q withdiscrete sprectrum
Estimates for the growth of the eigenvalues
Properties of the heat operator: trace class, estimates forthe trace etc
Index formulas
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Related problems
Existence of self-adjoint extensions of ∆k and ∆∂,p,q withdiscrete sprectrum
Estimates for the growth of the eigenvalues
Properties of the heat operator: trace class, estimates forthe trace etc
Index formulas
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
The setting
(X ,h) irreducible Hermitian complex space.
h is a Hermitian metric on reg(X ), such that for each p ∈ X∃ U ⊂ X open, p ∈ U, ψ : U → BN ⊂ CN proper holomorphicembedding, β Hermitian metric on BN such that on U ∩ reg(X )
h = ψ∗β.
Examples:(M,g) complex Hermitian manifold, X ⊂ M analyticsub-variety and h := g|reg(X)
V ⊂ CPn complex projective variety endowed with themetric induced by Fubini-Study metric.
Consider now a compact and irreducible Hermitian complexspace (X ,h) of complex dimension m.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
The setting
(X ,h) irreducible Hermitian complex space.
h is a Hermitian metric on reg(X ), such that for each p ∈ X∃ U ⊂ X open, p ∈ U, ψ : U → BN ⊂ CN proper holomorphicembedding, β Hermitian metric on BN such that on U ∩ reg(X )
h = ψ∗β.
Examples:(M,g) complex Hermitian manifold, X ⊂ M analyticsub-variety and h := g|reg(X)
V ⊂ CPn complex projective variety endowed with themetric induced by Fubini-Study metric.
Consider now a compact and irreducible Hermitian complexspace (X ,h) of complex dimension m.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
The setting
(X ,h) irreducible Hermitian complex space.
h is a Hermitian metric on reg(X ), such that for each p ∈ X∃ U ⊂ X open, p ∈ U, ψ : U → BN ⊂ CN proper holomorphicembedding, β Hermitian metric on BN such that on U ∩ reg(X )
h = ψ∗β.
Examples:(M,g) complex Hermitian manifold, X ⊂ M analyticsub-variety and h := g|reg(X)
V ⊂ CPn complex projective variety endowed with themetric induced by Fubini-Study metric.
Consider now a compact and irreducible Hermitian complexspace (X ,h) of complex dimension m.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
The setting
(X ,h) irreducible Hermitian complex space.
h is a Hermitian metric on reg(X ), such that for each p ∈ X∃ U ⊂ X open, p ∈ U, ψ : U → BN ⊂ CN proper holomorphicembedding, β Hermitian metric on BN such that on U ∩ reg(X )
h = ψ∗β.
Examples:(M,g) complex Hermitian manifold, X ⊂ M analyticsub-variety and h := g|reg(X)
V ⊂ CPn complex projective variety endowed with themetric induced by Fubini-Study metric.
Consider now a compact and irreducible Hermitian complexspace (X ,h) of complex dimension m.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
The problem
We are interested in the following operators
∆ : L2(reg(X ),h)→ L2(reg(X ),h) (0.1)
∆∂ : L2(reg(X ),h)→ L2(reg(X ),h) (0.2)
with domain given by C∞c (reg(X )).
∆ := Laplace-Beltrami operator
∆∂ = ∂t ∂ := Hodge-Kodaira Laplacian (acting on functions)
Questions
Existence of self-adjoint extensions for ∆ and ∆∂ withdiscrete sprectrum
Estimates for the growth of the eigenvalues
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
The problem
We are interested in the following operators
∆ : L2(reg(X ),h)→ L2(reg(X ),h) (0.1)
∆∂ : L2(reg(X ),h)→ L2(reg(X ),h) (0.2)
with domain given by C∞c (reg(X )).
∆ := Laplace-Beltrami operator
∆∂ = ∂t ∂ := Hodge-Kodaira Laplacian (acting on functions)
Questions
Existence of self-adjoint extensions for ∆ and ∆∂ withdiscrete sprectrum
Estimates for the growth of the eigenvalues
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
The problem
We are interested in the following operators
∆ : L2(reg(X ),h)→ L2(reg(X ),h) (0.1)
∆∂ : L2(reg(X ),h)→ L2(reg(X ),h) (0.2)
with domain given by C∞c (reg(X )).
∆ := Laplace-Beltrami operator
∆∂ = ∂t ∂ := Hodge-Kodaira Laplacian (acting on functions)
Questions
Existence of self-adjoint extensions for ∆ and ∆∂ withdiscrete sprectrum
Estimates for the growth of the eigenvalues
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
First result
The first result toward these questions is the following:
TheoremLet (X ,h) be a compact and irreducible Hermitian complexspace of complex dimension v. Then we have the followingproperties:
D(dmax) = D(dmin) ( L2-Stokes theorem on functions)Assume that v > 1. We have a continuous inclusion
D(dmax) → L2v
v−1 (reg(X ),h).
Assume that v > 1. We have a compact inclusion
D(dmax) → L2(reg(X ),h).
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
First result
The first result toward these questions is the following:
TheoremLet (X ,h) be a compact and irreducible Hermitian complexspace of complex dimension v. Then we have the followingproperties:
D(dmax) = D(dmin) ( L2-Stokes theorem on functions)Assume that v > 1. We have a continuous inclusion
D(dmax) → L2v
v−1 (reg(X ),h).
Assume that v > 1. We have a compact inclusion
D(dmax) → L2(reg(X ),h).
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
First result
The first result toward these questions is the following:
TheoremLet (X ,h) be a compact and irreducible Hermitian complexspace of complex dimension v. Then we have the followingproperties:
D(dmax) = D(dmin) ( L2-Stokes theorem on functions)Assume that v > 1. We have a continuous inclusion
D(dmax) → L2v
v−1 (reg(X ),h).
Assume that v > 1. We have a compact inclusion
D(dmax) → L2(reg(X ),h).
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Sketch of the proof
D(dmax) = D(dmin)
This follows as a consequence of the following properties:
(reg(X ),h) is parabolic, ∃ φn ⊂ Lipc(reg(X ),h) such that0 ≤ φn ≤ 1, φn → 1, ‖dφn‖L2Ω1(reg(X),h) → 0.
Density result: L∞(reg(X ),h) ∩ C∞(reg(X )) ∩ D(dmax) isdense in D(dmax)
D(dmax) → L2v
v−1 (reg(X ),h)
This follows by the existence of an open cover V1, ...,Vmsuch that
Local Sobolev embedding holds on (reg(Vi),h|reg(Vi ))
D(dmax) → L2v
v−1 (reg(Vi),h|reg(Vi ))
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Sketch of the proof
D(dmax) = D(dmin)
This follows as a consequence of the following properties:
(reg(X ),h) is parabolic, ∃ φn ⊂ Lipc(reg(X ),h) such that0 ≤ φn ≤ 1, φn → 1, ‖dφn‖L2Ω1(reg(X),h) → 0.
Density result: L∞(reg(X ),h) ∩ C∞(reg(X )) ∩ D(dmax) isdense in D(dmax)
D(dmax) → L2v
v−1 (reg(X ),h)
This follows by the existence of an open cover V1, ...,Vmsuch that
Local Sobolev embedding holds on (reg(Vi),h|reg(Vi ))
D(dmax) → L2v
v−1 (reg(Vi),h|reg(Vi ))
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Sketch of the proof
D(dmax) = D(dmin)
This follows as a consequence of the following properties:
(reg(X ),h) is parabolic, ∃ φn ⊂ Lipc(reg(X ),h) such that0 ≤ φn ≤ 1, φn → 1, ‖dφn‖L2Ω1(reg(X),h) → 0.
Density result: L∞(reg(X ),h) ∩ C∞(reg(X )) ∩ D(dmax) isdense in D(dmax)
D(dmax) → L2v
v−1 (reg(X ),h)
This follows by the existence of an open cover V1, ...,Vmsuch that
Local Sobolev embedding holds on (reg(Vi),h|reg(Vi ))
D(dmax) → L2v
v−1 (reg(Vi),h|reg(Vi ))
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Sketch of the proof
D(dmax) = D(dmin)
This follows as a consequence of the following properties:
(reg(X ),h) is parabolic, ∃ φn ⊂ Lipc(reg(X ),h) such that0 ≤ φn ≤ 1, φn → 1, ‖dφn‖L2Ω1(reg(X),h) → 0.
Density result: L∞(reg(X ),h) ∩ C∞(reg(X )) ∩ D(dmax) isdense in D(dmax)
D(dmax) → L2v
v−1 (reg(X ),h)
This follows by the existence of an open cover V1, ...,Vmsuch that
Local Sobolev embedding holds on (reg(Vi),h|reg(Vi ))
D(dmax) → L2v
v−1 (reg(Vi),h|reg(Vi ))
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
The LSE follows by using a local quasi-isometric Kahler modelof h|reg(Vi ) and the Michael-Simon’s Sobolev inequality:(∫
Mf
mm−1 dvolg
)m−1m
≤ C(∫
M|H||f |dvolg +
∫M|df |gdvolg
)
Continuous partition of unity γ1, ..., γm subordinated toV1, ...,Vm such that
γi |reg(Vi ) is smooth and ‖d(γi |reg(Vi ))‖L∞Ω1(reg(X),h) <∞
D(dmax) → L2(reg(X ),h)
This follows using the following properties:
D(dmax) → L2v
v−1 (reg(X ),h) (Sobolev embedding)
Volh(reg(X )) <∞ (finite volume)
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
The LSE follows by using a local quasi-isometric Kahler modelof h|reg(Vi ) and the Michael-Simon’s Sobolev inequality:(∫
Mf
mm−1 dvolg
)m−1m
≤ C(∫
M|H||f |dvolg +
∫M|df |gdvolg
)
Continuous partition of unity γ1, ..., γm subordinated toV1, ...,Vm such that
γi |reg(Vi ) is smooth and ‖d(γi |reg(Vi ))‖L∞Ω1(reg(X),h) <∞
D(dmax) → L2(reg(X ),h)
This follows using the following properties:
D(dmax) → L2v
v−1 (reg(X ),h) (Sobolev embedding)
Volh(reg(X )) <∞ (finite volume)
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
The LSE follows by using a local quasi-isometric Kahler modelof h|reg(Vi ) and the Michael-Simon’s Sobolev inequality:(∫
Mf
mm−1 dvolg
)m−1m
≤ C(∫
M|H||f |dvolg +
∫M|df |gdvolg
)
Continuous partition of unity γ1, ..., γm subordinated toV1, ...,Vm such that
γi |reg(Vi ) is smooth and ‖d(γi |reg(Vi ))‖L∞Ω1(reg(X),h) <∞
D(dmax) → L2(reg(X ),h)
This follows using the following properties:
D(dmax) → L2v
v−1 (reg(X ),h) (Sobolev embedding)
Volh(reg(X )) <∞ (finite volume)Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Application to the Laplace-Beltrami operator
TheoremThe Friedrich extension
∆F : L2(reg(X ),h)→ L2(reg(X ),h) (0.3)
of the Laplace-Beltrami operator has discrete spectrum.
Let
0 ≤ λ1 ≤ λ2 ≤ ... ≤ λk ≤ ...
be the eigenvalues of (0.3). Then
lim infλkk−1v > 0 (0.4)
as k →∞. Finally e−t∆F : L2(reg(X ),h)→ L2(reg(X ),h) istrace class and for some C > 0 and 0 < t ≤ 1 its trace satisfies
Tr(e−t∆F ) ≤ Ct−v (0.5)
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Application to the Laplace-Beltrami operator
TheoremThe Friedrich extension
∆F : L2(reg(X ),h)→ L2(reg(X ),h) (0.3)
of the Laplace-Beltrami operator has discrete spectrum. Let
0 ≤ λ1 ≤ λ2 ≤ ... ≤ λk ≤ ...
be the eigenvalues of (0.3). Then
lim infλkk−1v > 0 (0.4)
as k →∞.
Finally e−t∆F : L2(reg(X ),h)→ L2(reg(X ),h) istrace class and for some C > 0 and 0 < t ≤ 1 its trace satisfies
Tr(e−t∆F ) ≤ Ct−v (0.5)
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Application to the Laplace-Beltrami operator
TheoremThe Friedrich extension
∆F : L2(reg(X ),h)→ L2(reg(X ),h) (0.3)
of the Laplace-Beltrami operator has discrete spectrum. Let
0 ≤ λ1 ≤ λ2 ≤ ... ≤ λk ≤ ...
be the eigenvalues of (0.3). Then
lim infλkk−1v > 0 (0.4)
as k →∞. Finally e−t∆F : L2(reg(X ),h)→ L2(reg(X ),h) istrace class and for some C > 0 and 0 < t ≤ 1 its trace satisfies
Tr(e−t∆F ) ≤ Ct−v (0.5)
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Sketch of the proof
Let k(t , x , y) be the heat kernel corresponding to e−t∆F . Then:
D(dmax) → L2v
v−1 (reg(X ),h) =⇒ k(t , x , y) ≤ Bt−v
for (x , y) ∈ reg(X )× reg(Y ), 0 ≤ t ≤ 1, B > 0,
k(t , x , y) ≤ Bt−v and volh(reg(X )) <∞ =⇒ e−t∆F is traceclass and Tr(e−t∆F ) ≤ Ct−v for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 and C > 0,
=⇒∆F has discrete spectrum and lim infλkk1v > 0 as k →∞.
Note: ∆F has discrete spectrum follows directly by the compactinclusion D(dmax) → L2(reg(X ),h).
Other consequences: e−t∆F is ultracontractive for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1, feigenfunction of ∆F then f ∈ L∞(reg(X ),h).
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Sketch of the proof
Let k(t , x , y) be the heat kernel corresponding to e−t∆F . Then:
D(dmax) → L2v
v−1 (reg(X ),h) =⇒ k(t , x , y) ≤ Bt−v
for (x , y) ∈ reg(X )× reg(Y ), 0 ≤ t ≤ 1, B > 0,
k(t , x , y) ≤ Bt−v and volh(reg(X )) <∞ =⇒ e−t∆F is traceclass and Tr(e−t∆F ) ≤ Ct−v for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 and C > 0,
=⇒∆F has discrete spectrum and lim infλkk1v > 0 as k →∞.
Note: ∆F has discrete spectrum follows directly by the compactinclusion D(dmax) → L2(reg(X ),h).
Other consequences: e−t∆F is ultracontractive for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1, feigenfunction of ∆F then f ∈ L∞(reg(X ),h).
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Sketch of the proof
Let k(t , x , y) be the heat kernel corresponding to e−t∆F . Then:
D(dmax) → L2v
v−1 (reg(X ),h) =⇒ k(t , x , y) ≤ Bt−v
for (x , y) ∈ reg(X )× reg(Y ), 0 ≤ t ≤ 1, B > 0,
k(t , x , y) ≤ Bt−v and volh(reg(X )) <∞ =⇒ e−t∆F is traceclass and Tr(e−t∆F ) ≤ Ct−v for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 and C > 0,
=⇒∆F has discrete spectrum and lim infλkk1v > 0 as k →∞.
Note: ∆F has discrete spectrum follows directly by the compactinclusion D(dmax) → L2(reg(X ),h).
Other consequences: e−t∆F is ultracontractive for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1, feigenfunction of ∆F then f ∈ L∞(reg(X ),h).
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Application to the Hodge-Kodaira Laplacian
TheoremConsider the Friedrich extension
∆F∂
: L2(reg(X ),h)→ L2(reg(X ),h)
of the Hodge-Kodaira Laplacian. Then ∆F∂
has discretespectrum.
Sketch of the proof:
1) ∆F∂
= ∂tmax ∂min
2) Continuous inclusion: D(∆F∂
) → D(∂min)
‖∂minf‖2L2Ω0,1(reg(X),h) ≤ ‖f‖2L2(reg(X),h) + ‖∆F
∂f‖2L2(reg(X),h)
3) Compact inclusion: D(∂min) → L2(reg(X ),h)
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Application to the Hodge-Kodaira Laplacian
TheoremConsider the Friedrich extension
∆F∂
: L2(reg(X ),h)→ L2(reg(X ),h)
of the Hodge-Kodaira Laplacian. Then ∆F∂
has discretespectrum.
Sketch of the proof:
1) ∆F∂
= ∂tmax ∂min
2) Continuous inclusion: D(∆F∂
) → D(∂min)
‖∂minf‖2L2Ω0,1(reg(X),h) ≤ ‖f‖2L2(reg(X),h) + ‖∆F
∂f‖2L2(reg(X),h)
3) Compact inclusion: D(∂min) → L2(reg(X ),h)
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Some remarks
h is not required to be Kahler,No assumptions on sing(X ),No assumptions on dim(X )
If h is Kahler then the eigenvalues λk of ∆F∂
obeys
lim infλkk−1v > 0
and e−t∆F∂ : L2(reg(X ),h)→ L2(reg(X ),h) is trace class with
Tr(e−t∆F∂ ) ≤ Bt−v
for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1. This follows simply by the fact that ∆ = 2∆∂ onC∞(reg(X )) and therefore
∆F = 2∆F∂
on L2(reg(X ),h).
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Some remarks
h is not required to be Kahler,No assumptions on sing(X ),No assumptions on dim(X )
If h is Kahler then the eigenvalues λk of ∆F∂
obeys
lim infλkk−1v > 0
and e−t∆F∂ : L2(reg(X ),h)→ L2(reg(X ),h) is trace class with
Tr(e−t∆F∂ ) ≤ Bt−v
for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1.
This follows simply by the fact that ∆ = 2∆∂ onC∞(reg(X )) and therefore
∆F = 2∆F∂
on L2(reg(X ),h).
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Some remarks
h is not required to be Kahler,No assumptions on sing(X ),No assumptions on dim(X )
If h is Kahler then the eigenvalues λk of ∆F∂
obeys
lim infλkk−1v > 0
and e−t∆F∂ : L2(reg(X ),h)→ L2(reg(X ),h) is trace class with
Tr(e−t∆F∂ ) ≤ Bt−v
for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1. This follows simply by the fact that ∆ = 2∆∂ onC∞(reg(X )) and therefore
∆F = 2∆F∂
on L2(reg(X ),h).Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Application to possibly singular complex surfaces
Let (X ,h) be a compact and irreducible Hermitian complexspace of complex dimension 2.
Let q = 0, ...,2 and consider the Hodge-Kodaira Laplacian
∆∂,2,q : Ω2,q(reg(X ))→ Ω2,q(reg(X ))
Let us introduce the following self-adjoint extension, called theabsolute extension
∆∂,2,q,abs : Ω2,q(reg(X ))→ Ω2,q(reg(X ))
∆∂,2,q,abs := ∂t2,q,min ∂2,q,max + ∂2,q−1,max ∂
t2,q−1,min
with domain D(∆∂,2,q,abs) := ω ∈ D(∂2,q,max) ∩ D(∂t2,q−1,min) :
∂t2,q−1,minω ∈ D(∂2,q−1,max), ∂2,q,maxω ∈ D(∂
t2,q,min).
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Application to possibly singular complex surfaces
Let (X ,h) be a compact and irreducible Hermitian complexspace of complex dimension 2.Let q = 0, ...,2 and consider the Hodge-Kodaira Laplacian
∆∂,2,q : Ω2,q(reg(X ))→ Ω2,q(reg(X ))
Let us introduce the following self-adjoint extension, called theabsolute extension
∆∂,2,q,abs : Ω2,q(reg(X ))→ Ω2,q(reg(X ))
∆∂,2,q,abs := ∂t2,q,min ∂2,q,max + ∂2,q−1,max ∂
t2,q−1,min
with domain D(∆∂,2,q,abs) := ω ∈ D(∂2,q,max) ∩ D(∂t2,q−1,min) :
∂t2,q−1,minω ∈ D(∂2,q−1,max), ∂2,q,maxω ∈ D(∂
t2,q,min).
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Application to possibly singular complex surfaces
Let (X ,h) be a compact and irreducible Hermitian complexspace of complex dimension 2.Let q = 0, ...,2 and consider the Hodge-Kodaira Laplacian
∆∂,2,q : Ω2,q(reg(X ))→ Ω2,q(reg(X ))
Let us introduce the following self-adjoint extension, called theabsolute extension
∆∂,2,q,abs : Ω2,q(reg(X ))→ Ω2,q(reg(X ))
∆∂,2,q,abs := ∂t2,q,min ∂2,q,max + ∂2,q−1,max ∂
t2,q−1,min
with domain D(∆∂,2,q,abs) := ω ∈ D(∂2,q,max) ∩ D(∂t2,q−1,min) :
∂t2,q−1,minω ∈ D(∂2,q−1,max), ∂2,q,maxω ∈ D(∂
t2,q,min).
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Application to possibly singular complex surfaces
Let (X ,h) be a compact and irreducible Hermitian complexspace of complex dimension 2.Let q = 0, ...,2 and consider the Hodge-Kodaira Laplacian
∆∂,2,q : Ω2,q(reg(X ))→ Ω2,q(reg(X ))
Let us introduce the following self-adjoint extension, called theabsolute extension
∆∂,2,q,abs : Ω2,q(reg(X ))→ Ω2,q(reg(X ))
∆∂,2,q,abs := ∂t2,q,min ∂2,q,max + ∂2,q−1,max ∂
t2,q−1,min
with domain D(∆∂,2,q,abs) := ω ∈ D(∂2,q,max) ∩ D(∂t2,q−1,min) :
∂t2,q−1,minω ∈ D(∂2,q−1,max), ∂2,q,maxω ∈ D(∂
t2,q,min).
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Application to possibly singular complex surfaces
Let (X ,h) be a compact and irreducible Hermitian complexspace of complex dimension 2.Let q = 0, ...,2 and consider the Hodge-Kodaira Laplacian
∆∂,2,q : Ω2,q(reg(X ))→ Ω2,q(reg(X ))
Let us introduce the following self-adjoint extension, called theabsolute extension
∆∂,2,q,abs : Ω2,q(reg(X ))→ Ω2,q(reg(X ))
∆∂,2,q,abs := ∂t2,q,min ∂2,q,max + ∂2,q−1,max ∂
t2,q−1,min
with domain D(∆∂,2,q,abs) := ω ∈ D(∂2,q,max) ∩ D(∂t2,q−1,min) :
∂t2,q−1,minω ∈ D(∂2,q−1,max), ∂2,q,maxω ∈ D(∂
t2,q,min).
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
∆∂,2,q,abs are the Laplacians associated to the Hilbert complex
(L2Ω2,q(reg(V ),h), ∂2,q,max)
that is the maximal extension of the Dolbeault complex
(Ω2,qc (reg(V ), ∂2,q)
Combining our previous results with a theorem proved by J.Ruppenthal in 2014 we have the following result:
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
∆∂,2,q,abs are the Laplacians associated to the Hilbert complex
(L2Ω2,q(reg(V ),h), ∂2,q,max)
that is the maximal extension of the Dolbeault complex
(Ω2,qc (reg(V ), ∂2,q)
Combining our previous results with a theorem proved by J.Ruppenthal in 2014 we have the following result:
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
∆∂,2,q,abs are the Laplacians associated to the Hilbert complex
(L2Ω2,q(reg(V ),h), ∂2,q,max)
that is the maximal extension of the Dolbeault complex
(Ω2,qc (reg(V ), ∂2,q)
Combining our previous results with a theorem proved by J.Ruppenthal in 2014 we have the following result:
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
∆∂,2,q,abs are the Laplacians associated to the Hilbert complex
(L2Ω2,q(reg(V ),h), ∂2,q,max)
that is the maximal extension of the Dolbeault complex
(Ω2,qc (reg(V ), ∂2,q)
Combining our previous results with a theorem proved by J.Ruppenthal in 2014 we have the following result:
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
TheoremLet (X ,h) be a compact and irreducible Hermitian complexspace of complex dimension 2. Then, for each q = 0, ...,2, theoperator
∆∂,2,q,abs : L2Ω2,q(reg(V ),h)→ L2Ω2,q(reg(V ),h)
has discrete spectrum.
Assume now that h is Kahler. Let
0 ≤ λ1 ≤ λ2 ≤ ... ≤ λk ≤ ...
be the eigenvalues of ∆∂,2,q,abs. Then we have the followingasymptotic inequality
lim infλkk−12 > 0
as k →∞.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
TheoremLet (X ,h) be a compact and irreducible Hermitian complexspace of complex dimension 2. Then, for each q = 0, ...,2, theoperator
∆∂,2,q,abs : L2Ω2,q(reg(V ),h)→ L2Ω2,q(reg(V ),h)
has discrete spectrum. Assume now that h is Kahler. Let
0 ≤ λ1 ≤ λ2 ≤ ... ≤ λk ≤ ...
be the eigenvalues of ∆∂,2,q,abs.
Then we have the followingasymptotic inequality
lim infλkk−12 > 0
as k →∞.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
TheoremLet (X ,h) be a compact and irreducible Hermitian complexspace of complex dimension 2. Then, for each q = 0, ...,2, theoperator
∆∂,2,q,abs : L2Ω2,q(reg(V ),h)→ L2Ω2,q(reg(V ),h)
has discrete spectrum. Assume now that h is Kahler. Let
0 ≤ λ1 ≤ λ2 ≤ ... ≤ λk ≤ ...
be the eigenvalues of ∆∂,2,q,abs. Then we have the followingasymptotic inequality
lim infλkk−12 > 0
as k →∞.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Sketch of the proof
The case (2,0) follows by F. B. 2016.
The case (2,2) follows by the results previously described.In particular
∆∂,2,2,abs ∗ c = ∗ c ∆F∂
The case (2,1) follows in this way:
Thanks to Ruppenthal we know that ker(∆∂,2,1,abs) is finitedimensional and that im(∆∂,2,1,abs) is closed.Therefore ∆∂,2,1,abs has discrete spectrum if and only if theinclusion
D(∆∂,2,1,abs) ∩ im(∆∂,2,1,abs) → L2Ω2,1(reg(X ),h)
is compact. Now this last point follows as a consequence of thenext proposition
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Sketch of the proof
The case (2,0) follows by F. B. 2016.The case (2,2) follows by the results previously described.In particular
∆∂,2,2,abs ∗ c = ∗ c ∆F∂
The case (2,1) follows in this way:
Thanks to Ruppenthal we know that ker(∆∂,2,1,abs) is finitedimensional and that im(∆∂,2,1,abs) is closed.Therefore ∆∂,2,1,abs has discrete spectrum if and only if theinclusion
D(∆∂,2,1,abs) ∩ im(∆∂,2,1,abs) → L2Ω2,1(reg(X ),h)
is compact. Now this last point follows as a consequence of thenext proposition
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Sketch of the proof
The case (2,0) follows by F. B. 2016.The case (2,2) follows by the results previously described.In particular
∆∂,2,2,abs ∗ c = ∗ c ∆F∂
The case (2,1) follows in this way:
Thanks to Ruppenthal we know that ker(∆∂,2,1,abs) is finitedimensional and that im(∆∂,2,1,abs) is closed.
Therefore ∆∂,2,1,abs has discrete spectrum if and only if theinclusion
D(∆∂,2,1,abs) ∩ im(∆∂,2,1,abs) → L2Ω2,1(reg(X ),h)
is compact. Now this last point follows as a consequence of thenext proposition
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Sketch of the proof
The case (2,0) follows by F. B. 2016.The case (2,2) follows by the results previously described.In particular
∆∂,2,2,abs ∗ c = ∗ c ∆F∂
The case (2,1) follows in this way:
Thanks to Ruppenthal we know that ker(∆∂,2,1,abs) is finitedimensional and that im(∆∂,2,1,abs) is closed.Therefore ∆∂,2,1,abs has discrete spectrum if and only if theinclusion
D(∆∂,2,1,abs) ∩ im(∆∂,2,1,abs) → L2Ω2,1(reg(X ),h)
is compact. Now this last point follows as a consequence of thenext proposition
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
PropositionLet Hk , k = 1,2,3 be separable Hilbert spaces and letTk : Hk → Hk+1 be unbounded, densely defined and closedoperators such that
im(T1) ⊂ ker(T2)
im(Tk ) is closed, k = 1,2.Let
∆T := T2∗ T2 + T1 T ∗1 .
Then the following properties are equivalent:D(T ∗1 T1) ∩ im(T ∗1 T1) → H1 andD(T2 T ∗2 ) ∩ im(T2 T ∗2 ) → H3 are both compactinclusions.
D(∆T ) ∩ im(∆T ) → H2 is a compact inclusion
Since we know that both ∆∂,2,0,abs and ∆∂,2,2,abs have discretespectrum the proof is complete.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
PropositionLet Hk , k = 1,2,3 be separable Hilbert spaces and letTk : Hk → Hk+1 be unbounded, densely defined and closedoperators such that
im(T1) ⊂ ker(T2)
im(Tk ) is closed, k = 1,2.Let
∆T := T2∗ T2 + T1 T ∗1 .
Then the following properties are equivalent:D(T ∗1 T1) ∩ im(T ∗1 T1) → H1 andD(T2 T ∗2 ) ∩ im(T2 T ∗2 ) → H3 are both compactinclusions.
D(∆T ) ∩ im(∆T ) → H2 is a compact inclusion
Since we know that both ∆∂,2,0,abs and ∆∂,2,2,abs have discretespectrum the proof is complete.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
PropositionLet Hk , k = 1,2,3 be separable Hilbert spaces and letTk : Hk → Hk+1 be unbounded, densely defined and closedoperators such that
im(T1) ⊂ ker(T2)
im(Tk ) is closed, k = 1,2.
Let∆T := T2∗ T2 + T1 T ∗1 .
Then the following properties are equivalent:D(T ∗1 T1) ∩ im(T ∗1 T1) → H1 andD(T2 T ∗2 ) ∩ im(T2 T ∗2 ) → H3 are both compactinclusions.
D(∆T ) ∩ im(∆T ) → H2 is a compact inclusion
Since we know that both ∆∂,2,0,abs and ∆∂,2,2,abs have discretespectrum the proof is complete.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
PropositionLet Hk , k = 1,2,3 be separable Hilbert spaces and letTk : Hk → Hk+1 be unbounded, densely defined and closedoperators such that
im(T1) ⊂ ker(T2)
im(Tk ) is closed, k = 1,2.Let
∆T := T2∗ T2 + T1 T ∗1 .
Then the following properties are equivalent:
D(T ∗1 T1) ∩ im(T ∗1 T1) → H1 andD(T2 T ∗2 ) ∩ im(T2 T ∗2 ) → H3 are both compactinclusions.
D(∆T ) ∩ im(∆T ) → H2 is a compact inclusion
Since we know that both ∆∂,2,0,abs and ∆∂,2,2,abs have discretespectrum the proof is complete.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
PropositionLet Hk , k = 1,2,3 be separable Hilbert spaces and letTk : Hk → Hk+1 be unbounded, densely defined and closedoperators such that
im(T1) ⊂ ker(T2)
im(Tk ) is closed, k = 1,2.Let
∆T := T2∗ T2 + T1 T ∗1 .
Then the following properties are equivalent:D(T ∗1 T1) ∩ im(T ∗1 T1) → H1 andD(T2 T ∗2 ) ∩ im(T2 T ∗2 ) → H3 are both compactinclusions.
D(∆T ) ∩ im(∆T ) → H2 is a compact inclusion
Since we know that both ∆∂,2,0,abs and ∆∂,2,2,abs have discretespectrum the proof is complete.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
PropositionLet Hk , k = 1,2,3 be separable Hilbert spaces and letTk : Hk → Hk+1 be unbounded, densely defined and closedoperators such that
im(T1) ⊂ ker(T2)
im(Tk ) is closed, k = 1,2.Let
∆T := T2∗ T2 + T1 T ∗1 .
Then the following properties are equivalent:D(T ∗1 T1) ∩ im(T ∗1 T1) → H1 andD(T2 T ∗2 ) ∩ im(T2 T ∗2 ) → H3 are both compactinclusions.
D(∆T ) ∩ im(∆T ) → H2 is a compact inclusion
Since we know that both ∆∂,2,0,abs and ∆∂,2,2,abs have discretespectrum the proof is complete.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
PropositionLet Hk , k = 1,2,3 be separable Hilbert spaces and letTk : Hk → Hk+1 be unbounded, densely defined and closedoperators such that
im(T1) ⊂ ker(T2)
im(Tk ) is closed, k = 1,2.Let
∆T := T2∗ T2 + T1 T ∗1 .
Then the following properties are equivalent:D(T ∗1 T1) ∩ im(T ∗1 T1) → H1 andD(T2 T ∗2 ) ∩ im(T2 T ∗2 ) → H3 are both compactinclusions.
D(∆T ) ∩ im(∆T ) → H2 is a compact inclusion
Since we know that both ∆∂,2,0,abs and ∆∂,2,2,abs have discretespectrum the proof is complete.
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Mckean-Singer formula
Corollary
χ(M,KM) = ind((∂2,max + ∂t2,min)+) =
2∑q=0
(−1)q Tr(e−t∆∂,2,q,abs),
χ(M,OM) = ind((∂0,min + ∂t0,max)+) =
2∑q=0
(−1)q Tr(e−t∆∂,0,q,rel).
whereπ : M → X is any resolution of X ,KM is the sheaf of holomorphic (2,0)-forms on M,χ(M,KM) =
∑2q=0(−1)q dim(Hq(M,KM)),
χ(M,OM) =∑2
q=0(−1)q dim(H0,q∂
(M)).
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Mckean-Singer formula
Corollary
χ(M,KM) = ind((∂2,max + ∂t2,min)+) =
2∑q=0
(−1)q Tr(e−t∆∂,2,q,abs),
χ(M,OM) = ind((∂0,min + ∂t0,max)+) =
2∑q=0
(−1)q Tr(e−t∆∂,0,q,rel).
whereπ : M → X is any resolution of X ,KM is the sheaf of holomorphic (2,0)-forms on M,χ(M,KM) =
∑2q=0(−1)q dim(Hq(M,KM)),
χ(M,OM) =∑2
q=0(−1)q dim(H0,q∂
(M)).
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Mckean-Singer formula
Corollary
χ(M,KM) = ind((∂2,max + ∂t2,min)+) =
2∑q=0
(−1)q Tr(e−t∆∂,2,q,abs),
χ(M,OM) = ind((∂0,min + ∂t0,max)+) =
2∑q=0
(−1)q Tr(e−t∆∂,0,q,rel).
whereπ : M → X is any resolution of X ,KM is the sheaf of holomorphic (2,0)-forms on M,χ(M,KM) =
∑2q=0(−1)q dim(Hq(M,KM)),
χ(M,OM) =∑2
q=0(−1)q dim(H0,q∂
(M)).
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Mckean-Singer formula
Corollary
χ(M,KM) = ind((∂2,max + ∂t2,min)+) =
2∑q=0
(−1)q Tr(e−t∆∂,2,q,abs),
χ(M,OM) = ind((∂0,min + ∂t0,max)+) =
2∑q=0
(−1)q Tr(e−t∆∂,0,q,rel).
whereπ : M → X is any resolution of X ,KM is the sheaf of holomorphic (2,0)-forms on M,χ(M,KM) =
∑2q=0(−1)q dim(Hq(M,KM)),
χ(M,OM) =∑2
q=0(−1)q dim(H0,q∂
(M)).
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces
Thanks for your attention
Francesco Bei On the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact complex spaces