Synthesis and electrochemical performance of reduced graphene ...
On the electrochemical synthesis and charge storage properties of ...
Transcript of On the electrochemical synthesis and charge storage properties of ...
1
On the electrochemical synthesis and charge storage properties of
WO3/polyaniline hybrid nanostructures
Gergely F. Samu1,2, Kriszta Pencz1, Csaba Janáky1,2,*, Krishnan Rajeshwar3,*
1Department of Physical Chemistry and Materials Science, University of Szeged, Rerrich Square 1, H6720,
Szeged, Hungary 2MTA-SZTE „Lendület” Photoelectrochemistry Research Group, Rerrich Square 1, H6720, Szeged, Hungary
3Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas 76019
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study is to tailor the electrochemical synthesis of hybrid materials, consisting
of nanoporous tungsten trioxide (WO3) and polyaniline (PANI) for application as
supercapacitor electrodes. Nanoporous WO3, synthetized by the anodization of tungsten foils,
acted as the active material framework for this assembly. With the variation of the anodization
voltage, host materials with different morphological features were prepared. Subsequently,
electrodeposition of PANI was carried out by potentiodynamic cycling in highly acidic media.
Through alteration of the number of deposition cycles the amount of deposited PANI was
varied. This parameter had a decisive impact on the morphology of the resulting hybrids as
confirmed by SEM images. Cyclic voltammetry and galvanostatic charge discharge
measurements were carried out to characterize the charge storage properties of the synthetized
hybrids. By comparing electrochemical data with structural properties, structure-property
relationships were established, and under optimal condition 350 F g-1 and 200 mF cm-2 were
obtained.
Keywords: polyaniline, WO3, supercapacitor, electrochemical deposition, composite
corresponding authors
C. Janáky: [email protected], Rerrich Sq. 1, Szeged, Hungary, H6720; Tel: +36-62-546393
K. Rajeshwar: [email protected], 76013 Planetarium Place 1, Arlington, TX, USA
This article is dedicated to Mikhail A. Vorotyntsev on the occasion of his 70th birthday in
recognition of his valuable contribution to the electrochemistry of redox active films.
2
Introduction
New devices for harnessing renewable energy sources are an essential part of future
economics. The overall efficiency of these devices, however, is limited by the intermittency of
the underlying renewable energy sources. To address this issue the development of high
efficiency energy storage devices is critically needed. In this vein, this study focuses on
materials exhibiting pseudocapacitive properties. In this type of electrochemical capacitor
device, both ion adsorption and fast reversible redox processes on the electrode surface
contribute to the overall charge storage capability. Both transition metal oxides and conducting
polymers (CPs) possess such attributes [1, 2].
In terms of electro-optical properties WO3 is one of the most intensively studied
transition metal oxides. As a relatively narrow bandgap semiconductor (Eg=2.6 eV) it is a
promising candidate for visible light harvesting photoanodes [3, 4]; furthermore, it possesses
electrochromic properties which makes it an ideal component of smart windows and displays
[5, 6]. However, unlike other transition metal oxides (e.g., RuO2), the pseudocapacitive nature
of this oxide remains as yet, incompletely exploited. The enhanced electroactivity of WO3 in
acidic media is rooted in the formation of tungsten bronze (HxWO3), supported by H+
uptake/release as charge compensation during the (W6+/W5+) redox process [7].
Research in this area has mainly focused on revealing the relationship between charge
storage capability and the oxide structure as summarized in the first part of Table 1. For
example, a tenfold increase in the specific capacitance was achieved by fabricating nanoporous
structures [8]. This enhancement was attributed to the greater extent of electrolyte penetration
into the nanostructure, thus increasing the active area of the electrode participating in the charge
storage process. Also an increase in the charge storage capability of WO3 was found by
obtaining crystal networks with precise ordering as demonstrated for hexagonal WO3 (h-WO3)
[9].
The methods employed in the preparation of the above mentioned materials are similar
in a sense that all of them require a binding agent to fix the active material on the supporting
electrode surface. This however may increase charge transfer resistance at the phase boundaries
between the different materials. These findings establish several important criteria for the
preparation procedure for the active electrode material: (i) large surface area (ii) controlled
morphology (iii) lack of binding agent. As an example, we note that the above summarized
criteria were ultimately met when h-WO3 nanowire arrays were fabricated directly on 3D
3
carbon cloth electrodes; the resultant hybrid exhibited superior performance when compared to
pure WO3 electrodes [10].
Anodization is a well-known method for preparing transition metal oxides [4, 11] with
effective control over the morphology of the produced nanostructures (pore size [12], layer
thickness [13–15], and structural features [16, 17]). Furthermore, it circumvents the use of
binding agents, as the nanostructured metal oxide is directly grown from the respective metal
foil.
Hybrid materials based on nanostructured transition metal oxides and CPs play a
continuously increasing role in both energy conversion and storage. Their utilization as
electrode materials for solar energy harvesting [19, 20], electrochromic devices and
supercapacitors [1, 20] has received well-deserved scientific attention in recent years. These
composite materials often outperform their pristine counterparts by uniting the beneficial
properties of the constituents.
In the case of supercapacitors, such hybrid formation can effectively address the
relatively poor cycling stability of CPs [2], while harnessing their complementary
pseudocapacitive properties with transition metal oxides. Several preparation procedures are
known to graft CPs into metal oxide nanostructures. Among them electrochemical methods are
often found to be more versatile than its rivals such as physical infiltration, mechanical mixing,
in situ chemical formation etc [21]. The main virtue of the electrochemical preparation strategy
is its intrinsic ability to achieve higher filling ratio in the nanostructured material while retaining
precise control over the morphology and the amount of the electrogenerated CP [21].
Polyaniline (PANI) is often selected as the CP component for such hybrid materials,
because of its remarkable chemical and electrochemical stability, versatile redox behavior,
electrochromic property, and large specific capacitance [22]. The use of WO3/PANI hybrids is
further supported by the similarity in the ion exchange properties of the two materials (both
electron and proton conduction) [23, 24]. As summarized in the second part of Table 1,
fabrication of WO3/PANI hybrids have been carried out using various techniques; however, the
performance of these materials has remained disappointingly low in all cases.
In this study we build on companion efforts [23, 24] and electrochemically graft PANI
on nanoporous WO3 electrodes prepared by anodization. The effect of different polymer
loadings on the charge storage properties of the hybrids was evaluated and the key
morphological aspects were studied. Our goal was to study the establish structure-property
relationships between the morphological attributes and the electrochemical properties of the
hybrid materials.
4
Table 1.
Experimental
Materials
All chemicals used were of analytical grade. Tungsten (W) foils were purchased from Sigma-
Aldrich (99.9% purity, 0.25 mm thickness), while aniline and sulphuric acid were from VWR
International. Aniline monomer was freshly distilled before use. All other chemicals were used
as received. Ultrapure water (Milli-Q, ρ=18.2 MΩ cm) was used for the preparation of all
solutions.
Synthesis of nanoporous WO3 by anodization
Prior to anodization, the commercially purchased W foils were mechanically polished to
mirror finish using silicon carbide sandpaper with successively finer roughness. This
procedure was followed by three subsequent 5 min steps of ultrasonication in 2-
propanol, acetone and finally ultrapure water, to remove any attached organic
contaminants. Anodization was performed in a two electrode cell setup, where the W foil
served as the anode and a Pt foil as the cathode. The W foil was pressed between a set
of O-rings in the electrochemical cell, leaving 0.63 cm2 exposed to the electrolyte, and
the electric contact was located on the backside of the sample. The electrolyte consisted
of 0.15 M NaF in ultrapure water. The anodization was carried out at different voltages
using a programmable DC Power Supply (Voltcraft PSP 1803), while the procedure was
monitored by a Digital Multimeter (Keithley 2000). Both instruments were controlled
by custom-written LabView software. Immediately after anodization was completed, the
sample was carefully washed with ultrapure water and dried in N2 stream. To obtain the
desired crystalline phase of WO3, the anodized samples were annealed for 1 h at 450 °C
with a heating ramp of 10 °C min-1 (Thermo Scientific Heraeus K114 Furnace).
Electrochemical synthesis of WO3/PANI hybrids
For the electrochemical synthesis of the hybrids, a classical three-electrode
electrochemical cell was used, where the nanoporous WO3 functioned as the working
electrode, a Pt foil as a counterelectrode and a Ag/AgCl (3.0 M NaCl with a potential of
+200 mV vs. SHE) reference electrode completed the cell setup. A solution of 0.2 M
aniline in 0.5 M H2SO4 was used as the polymerization medium. Electrosynthesis (using
5
an Autolab PGSTAT10 instrument) of the hybrid materials built on previous findings in
our research groups [23]. Two distinctly different strategies were employed to synthetize
hybrids. Both of them were based on potentiodynamic deposition which was carried out
using a cycling protocol between E=-0.2 – 1.1 V for different cycle numbers (1-10) at a
sweep rate of 100 mV s-1. The key difference resided in the deposition methodology;
namely in the first set of experiments, separate WO3 electrodes were used for different
PANI amounts, while in the second set of experiments, the same WO3 electrode was
used to subsequently deposit gradually increasing amounts of PANI.
Electrochemical and morphological characterization
Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge-discharge measurements were carried out
in a monomer free 0.5 M H2SO4 solution with the same setup described for the electrosynthesis.
Before and during measurements the solution was deaerated by purging N2 through the solution.
CV measurements were carried out in a potential window of E=-0.5 – 0.7 V at four different
sweep rates between 10-100 mV s-1 for all samples. Charge-discharge measurements were
carried out with charging (and discharging) currents ranging from 0.2 – 0.5 mA with cut-off
limits at -0.5 V and 0.7 V respectively. Three cycles were performed and the last cycle was
used for quantification purposes. The morphology of the nanoporous WO3 and the hybrids was
studied using a field emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S-4700). All experiments
were performed at room temperature (20 ± 2 °C).
Estimation of the deposited PANI amounts
From the recorded I vs. t curves during potentiodynamic deposition the electrosynthesized
polymer mass can be calculated [25] by making the following assumptions: (i) the redox
reactions attributed to the forming polymer are completely reversible, thus the calculated excess
positive (anodic) charge from the CVs can be attributed to the oxidation of monomeric units
and the incorporation of anions into the thin PANI layer (ii) electrochemical oxidation of aniline
monomer is a two electron process (iii) in highly acidic media a highly doped polymer is formed
(xA=0.5) with A = HSO4- as the compensating anion [25]. The following expression was used
to calculate the mass of the deposited PANI:
𝑚𝑃𝐴𝑁𝐼 =((𝑀𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒 − 2 𝐴𝐻) + 𝑥𝐴 𝑀𝐴) 𝑄𝑝𝑜𝑙
(2 + 𝑥𝐴) 𝐹
6
where Maniline, MA and AH are the molar or atomic masses of the monomeric unit, compensating
anion and hydrogen, respectively. Qpol is the calculated polymerization charge and F is the
Faraday constant.
Direct measurement of the mass of electrodeposited PANI amounts was also performed for
samples with 3 different polymer loadings. It was found that, within the accuracy of our weight
measurements, the measured data paralleled their calculated counterparts, thus we used the
latter ones during further data analysis.
Calculation of the charge storage capacity
As seen in Table 1, there is no generally accepted protocol to measure charge storage capacity.
Charge-discharge measurement, compared to CV, however, is considered as a more reliable
method for this purpose. Thus in this study only capacitance values obtained from charge-
discharge measurements are shown. In this vein, to calculate the capacitance of the samples the
following expression was used:
𝐶 =𝐼 ∆𝑡
∆𝐸
where I (A) is the constant current applied during measurement, Δt (s) is the average of
measured charging and discharging time and ΔE (V) is the potential window of the
measurements (without IR drop correction).
To evaluate the contribution of the varying amount PANI to the overall specific capacitance of
the material, the measured capacitance of the WO3 framework was always subtracted from that
of the hybrid material at a given charging/discharging current. The resulting PANI related
capacitance was than divided by the deposited mass of the polymer calculated by the method
discussed earlier.
𝐶𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑚,𝑃𝐴𝑁𝐼 =(𝐶ℎ𝑦𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑑 − 𝐶𝑊𝑂3
)
𝑚𝑃𝐴𝑁𝐼
Results and Discussion
Preparation of WO3 samples via anodization
7
Electrochemical anodization was employed to fabricate nanoporous WO3 electrodes. To obtain
porous structures (instead of a compact metal oxide layer) it is necessary to carry out the
anodization in a solution of a complexing agent (in our case F-). Although there is wealth of
examples in the literature for this process,[4, 16, 26] its reproducibility falls below that of TiO2;
therefore precise control and monitoring of the synthesis parameters is indeed important.
Figure 1A shows current density vs. time traces recorded during anodization of different W
samples at a constant voltage of 60 V. At the first stage, which is magnified in the inset, the
voltage was gradually increased to 60 V, with a rate of 500 mV s-1. During this regime, the
evolution of two separate peaks can be discerned at well-defined voltages, which are also
present during the anodization of Ti foils [27]. The first peak was assigned to the fast-field aided
ion-transport (presumably F-) through the forming oxide layer, while the second to the increase
in electrode area due to pore formation. Subsequently, the two competing reactions (oxide
formation and dissolution) reached a steady state level, indicated by the near-constant current
density.
Figure 1.
Anodization experiments were performed at different voltages (Fig. 1B) to reveal the
decisive role of this parameter on the morphology of the prepared WO3 samples. Note that this
property is of prime importance from a supercapacitor perspective. With decreasing anodization
voltage a significant decline in the steady-state current density was observed, which is closely
related to the porosity of the prepared WO3 (see also SEM images in Fig. 3). This notion is
further verified by cyclic voltammetric (Fig. 2A) and charge-discharge measurements
performed on the oxide samples (Fig. 2B.) At all charging-discharging currents the decrease of
areal capacitance is observed at decreasing anodization voltages, which can originate from the
difference in the actual surface area of the samples, if we assume that there is no chemical
difference between the samples. Another characteristic of these data is the decreasing areal
capacitance with increasing charging currents (as confirmed by both CV and galvanostatic
charge-discharge measurements; see Fig. 2). This trend is caused by the gradually smaller
contribution of pseudocapacitive behavior to the overall capacitance of the oxide. However for
active materials for supercapacitor applications, a high charge/discharge rate is an important
requirement so in this study the emphasis was given to capacitance values obtained at higher
current densities.
8
Figure 2.
To visualize the morphological variances caused by the different preparation voltage,
SEM images were recorded for the heat treated WO3 samples (Fig. 3). With increasing voltage,
the nanoporous structure loses its initial ordered nature and becomes rather randomly
distributed. Furthermore, this is followed by the increase in the etched out amount of WO3 from
the initial compact oxide layer. These results are consistent with prior literature data on
nanoporous WO3 prepared under similar conditions [28].
Figure 3.
Preparation of WO3/PANI hybrids on distinct anodized samples
Potentiodynamic deposition (together with slow galvanostatic methods for some monomers) is
considered an ideal synthesis technique for obtaining oxide/CP hybrids, where mass transport
can be hindered by diffusion processes; this problem is exacerbated for nanostructured
electrodes [21]. In Fig. 4A, 5 potentiodynamic polymerization cycles are shown for aniline
electropolymerization. With the progress of polymerization, the gradual evolution of PANI-
related redox peaks is seen. By increasing the number of polymerization cycles the
polymerization charge increases (Fig. 4B), which should be proportional to the deposited
amount of polymer. This trend is also reflected in Fig. 4C, which shows the CVs of hybrids
with different compositions recorded at 50 mV s-1 sweep rate.
It is apparent that both the deposited PANI and the underlying nanoporous WO3 retained
its electroactivity in the hybrid material even at higher loadings (Fig. 4D). This may be
attributed to facile H+ transport throughout the hybrid material. Furthermore the preservation
of WO3 related redox peaks in the hybrid may indicate that the underlying nanoporous WO3 is
still accessible to H+ from the solution phase. Alternatively, the deposited PANI may be acting
as a relay layer for the transport of H+ [29], however, from CV results alone, differentiation of
these two different mechanisms is not possible.
For supercapacitor application, however, this complementary behavior is beneficial,
because pseudocapacitive contribution to the overall capacitance can be expected in the whole
potential window. In the case of this hybrid material the positive potential regime is limited by
the irreversible oxidation of PANI to its insulating form (pernigraniline), while in the negative
regime, reduction of water (or H+) is a restricting factor. Thus an optimized working potential
window of 1.2 V (from E = -0.5 to 0.7 V) was selected.
9
Figure 4.
Electrochemical characterization of the prepared hybrids
In Fig. 5, CVs recorded at four different sweep rates are presented for hybrids prepared by 3
cycles (A) and 10 polymerization cycles (B). As the deposition cycle number is increased a
thicker polymer layer is formed which is indicated by the increase in the peak current densities.
However in the second case, diffusion limitation of mass transport may arise. This manifests in
the relationship between the recorded peak current densities and the sweep rate. To uncover
this phenomenon the anodic and cathodic peaks, originating from the leucoemeraldine –
emeraldine transformation of PANI, were scrutinized. In the case of the sample with moderate
PANI content (3 cycles) we found that the peak current densities are linearly proportional to
the sweep rate (inset of Fig. 5A), whereas in the case of high PANI content, a linear
proportionality was found to the square root of the sweep rate (inset of Fig. 5B). This confirms
that in the second case redox transformation is diffusion limited (as opposed to the first case
which is clearly not), which in terms of supercapacitor electrodes means that longer charging
and discharging times are necessary to completely transform the electrode material.
Figure 5.
Morphological characterization of the prepared WO3/PANI hybrids
To investigate the morphological changes induced by the increasing amount of electrodeposited
PANI on the nanoporous WO3 template SEM images were taken (Fig. 6). It is obvious that with
increasing number of polymerization cycles the growth of PANI became more pronounced. In
the first few cycles the deeper pores of the nanoporous WO3 template were filled (1 cycle – B)
and thickening of the outstretched branches of the nanostructure was observed (3 cycles – C).
As the polymerization propagates, further PANI growth occurs predominantly at the top of the
sample (5 cycles – D) until complete coverage is reached (10 cycles – E). It is interesting to
note that the polymerization proceeds in a fashion that conserves the initial morphology of the
underlying nanoporous WO3 template, which is retained even after the voids are completely
filled, resulting in fractal like PANI coverage at prolonged depositions. This open structure can
be especially favorable for supercapacitor applications, since high surface area remains
preserved.
Figure 6.
10
Evaluation of the contribution of PANI to the overall charge capacity
The results of charge-discharge measurements conducted on hybrids with different PANI
loadings, at a charging/discharging current of 0.4 mA, are summarized in Fig. 7. As seen in Fig.
7A, the specific capacitance values (related to PANI) do not show a significant variation for the
hybrid samples with different polymer content. This indicates that under our circumstances, the
PANI content is accessible for all the materials, which can be rooted in the above discussed
nanostructured nature of the hybrids. As for the areal capacity, a continuous and linear increase
can be seen with the increasing PANI content, further supporting our earlier conclusions. The
maximum values of the normalized capacitance (Cspec ≈ 350 F g-1 and Carea ≈ 200 mF cm-2) are
among the best values obtained for this kind of hybrid materials [1][37].
Figure 7.
The stability of the hybrid material fabricated with 3 potentiodynamic cycles was evaluated by
exposing it to strenuous galvanostatic charge-discharge experiments at a charging/discharging
current of 0.5 mA. After 200 cycles the hybrid retained 93.4% of its initial capacitance value,
underlining that hybrid formation is indeed an effective strategy for combating the low cycling
stability of PANI [30].
Figure 8.
Consecutive potentiodynamic synthesis of WO3/PANI hybrids
To dismiss the possible inconsistencies arising from the use of separate WO3 samples for each
measurement, consecutive potentiodynamic deposition was also carried out, using the same
sample throughout the whole preparation and characterization procedure. In this manner, the
effect of increasing PANI content on the capacitive performance was studied by successive
overpolymerization on the previously formed hybrid. Figure 9A shows CVs at a sweep rate of
50 mV s-1 for the hybrids prepared with different deposition cycles. The same gradual increase
in the PANI related electroactivity can be observed as shown for the previous materials in Fig.
4C above. The charge-discharge measurements showed similar behavior: with increasing
polymer content the charging/discharging times increase. The capacitance values obtained from
these experiments are very close to those presented earlier (Cspec ≈ 330 F g-1 and Carea ≈ 170 mF
cm-2).
Figure 9.
11
This consecutive deposition procedure was employed to fabricate hybrids, where the
nanoporous WO3 host materials were anodized at different voltages. As opposed to the trend in
the initial capacitance values (Fig. 2B), the specific capacitance, related to PANI was highest
for the WO3 etched at 40V and lowest for the 60 V sample (Fig. 10). At this point, we presume
that the more ordered structure, together with a larger number of seeds for PANI deposition,
are the primary reasons for this peculiar trend.
Figure 10.
Conclusions
In this study a systematic investigation of nanostructured WO3/PANI hybrid electrodes was
carried out from a supercapacitor application perspective. A two-step electrochemical protocol
was employed to synthesize a series of WO3/PANI assemblies with varying PANI content. The
first step was the carefully controlled anodization of W-foils to form the nanoporous WO3 host
framework. Subsequently, PANI was electrografted on the oxide surface through
potentiodynamic cycling. The most important finding deduced from SEM studies was that the
hybrid retained its nanostructured nature even at very high PANI loadings. This nanostructures
morphology was reflected in the specific capacitance of the hybrids, namely that high values
were obtained even at high PANI amounts (as directly seen from the areal capacitance values).
The best capacitance values (obtained at relatively fast charge-discharge rates) were 350 F g-1
and 200 mF cm-2.
Acknowledgement
CJ thanks the Hungarian Academy of Sciences for financial support through its “Lendület”
excellence program. One of us (KR) thanks Sid Richardson Carbon & Energy Co., Fort Worth,
TX for partial funding support.
References
1. Wang G, Zhang L, Zhang J (2012) A review of electrode materials for electrochemical
supercapacitors. Chem Soc Rev 41:797–828
2. Snook GA, Kao P, Best AS (2011) Conducting-polymer-based supercapacitor devices and
electrodes. J Power Sources 196:1–12
3. Reyes-Gil KR, Wiggenhorn C, Brunschwig BS, Lewis NS (2013) Comparison between the
quantum yields of compact and porous WO3 photoanodes. J Phys Chem C 117:14947–
14957
12
4. Zhu T, Chong MN, Chan ES (2014) Nanostructured tungsten trioxide thin films synthesized
for photoelectrocatalytic water oxidation: A review. ChemSusChem 7:2974–2997
5. Deb SK (2008) Opportunities and challenges in science and technology of WO3 for
electrochromic and related applications. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 92:245–258
6. Nah Y-C, Ghicov A, Kim D, Schmuki P (2008) Enhanced electrochromic properties of self-
organized nanoporous WO3. Electrochem Commun 10:1777–1780
7. Zheng H, Ou JZ, Strano MS, Kaner RB, Mitchell A, Kalantar-zadeh K (2011) Nanostructured
tungsten oxide - properties, synthesis, and applications. Adv Funct Mater 21:2175–2196
8. Yoon S, Kang E, Kim JK, Lee CW, Lee J (2011) Development of high-performance
supercapacitor electrodes using novel ordered mesoporous tungsten oxide materials with
high electrical conductivity. Chem Commun 47:1021–1023
9. Zhu M, Meng W, Huang Y, Huang Y, Zhi C (2014) Proton-insertion-enhanced
pseudocapacitance based on the assembly structure of tungsten oxide. ACS Appl Mater
Interfaces 6:18901–18910
10. Gao L, Wang X, Xie Z, Song W, Wang L, Wu X, Qu F, Chen D, Shen G (2013) High-
performance energy-storage devices based on WO3 nanowire arrays/carbon cloth
integrated electrodes. J Mater Chem A 1:7167–7173
11. Roy P, Berger S, Schmuki P (2011) TiO2 nanotubes: synthesis and applications. Angew
Chem Int Ed 50:2904–2939
12. Chai Y, Tam CW, Beh KP, Yam FK, Hassan Z (2013) Porous WO3 formed by anodization
in oxalic acid. J Porous Mater 20:997–1002
13. Yang M, Shrestha NK, Schmuki P (2009) Thick porous tungsten trioxide films by
anodization of tungsten in fluoride containing phosphoric acid electrolyte. Electrochem
Commun 11:1908–1911
14. Lee W, Kim D, Lee K, Roy P, Schmuki P (2010) Direct anodic growth of thick WO3
mesosponge layers and characterization of their photoelectrochemical response.
Electrochim Acta 56:828–833
15. Ou JZ, Rani RA, Balendhran S, Zoolfakar AS, Field MR, Zhuiykov S, O'Mullane AP,
Kalantar-zadeh K (2013) Anodic formation of a thick three-dimensional nanoporous WO3
film and its photocatalytic property. Electrochem Commun 27:128–132
16. de Tacconi NR, Chenthamarakshan CR, Yogeeswaran G, Watcharenwong A, De Zoysa RS,
Basit NA, Rajeshwar K (2006) Nanoporous TiO2 and WO3 films by anodization of
titanium and tungsten substrates: Influence of process variables on morphology and
photoelectrochemical response. J Phys Chem B 110:25347–25355
117. Cristino V, Caramori S, Argazzi R, Meda L, Marra GL, Bignozzi CA (2011) Efficient
photoelectrochemical water splitting by anodically grown WO3 electrodes. Langmuir
27:7276–7284
13
18. Coakley KM, McGehee MD (2004) Conjugated polymer photovoltaic cells. Chem Mater
16:4533–4542
19. Wright M, Uddin A (2012) Organic-inorganic hybrid solar cells: A comparative review. Sol
Energy Mater Sol Cells 107:87–111
20. Yu G, Xie X, Pan L, Bao Z, Cui Y (2013) Hybrid nanostructured materials for high-
performance electrochemical capacitors. Nano Energy 2:213–234
21. Janáky C, Rajeshwar K (2014) The role of (photo)electrochemistry in the rational design of
hybrid conducting polymer/semiconductor assemblies: From fundamental concepts to
practical applications. Prog Polym Sci in press Doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.10.003
22. Li H, Wang J, Chu Q, Wang Z, Zhang F, Wang S (2009) Theoretical and experimental
specific capacitance of polyaniline in sulfuric acid. J Power Sources 190:578–586
23. Janáky C, de Tacconi NR, Chanmanee W, Rajeshwar K (2012) Electrodeposited polyaniline
in a nanoporous WO3 matrix: an organic/inorganic hybrid exhibiting both p-and n-type
photoelectrochemical activity. J Phys Chem C 116:4234–4242
24. Janáky C, de Tacconi NR, Chanmanee W, Rajeshwar K (2012) Bringing conjugated
polymers and oxide nanoarchitectures into intimate contact: Light-induced
electrodeposition of polypyrrole and polyaniline on nanoporous WO3 or TiO2 nanotube
array. J Phys Chem C 116:19145−19155
25. Baba A, Tian S, Stefani F, Xia C, Wang Z, Advincula RC, Johannsmann D, Knoll W (2004)
Electropolymerization and doping/dedoping properties of polyaniline thin films as studied
by electrochemical-surface plasmon spectroscopy and by the quartz crystal microbalance.
J Electroanal Chem 562:95–103
26. Tsuchiya H, Macak JM, Sieber I, et al. (2005) Self-organized porous WO3 formed in NaF
electrolytes. Electrochem Commun 7:295–298
27. Macak JM, Hildebrand H, Marten-Jahns U, Schmuki P (2008) Mechanistic aspects and
growth of large diameter self-organized TiO2 nanotubes. J Electroanal Chem 621:254–266
28. Watcharenwong A, Chanmanee W, de Tacconi NR, Chenthamarakshan CR,
Kajitvichyanukul P, Rajeshwar K (2008) Anodic growth of nanoporous WO3 films:
Morphology, photoelectrochemical response and photocatalytic activity for methylene
blue and hexavalent chrome conversion. J Electroanal Chem 612:112–120
29. Chen Z, Lv H, Zhu X, Li D, Zhang S, Chen X, Song Y (2014) Electropolymerization of
aniline onto anodic WO3 film: An approach to extend polyaniline electroactivity beyond
pH 7. J Phys Chem C 118:27449−27458
30. Wei H, Ding D, Yan X, Guo J, Shao L, Chen H, Sun L, Colorado HA, Wei S, Guo Z (2014)
Tungsten trioxide/zinc tungstate bilayers: Electrochromic behaviors, energy storage and
electron transfer. Electrochim Acta 132:58–66
14
31. Wei H, Yan X, Wu S, Luo Z, Wei S, Guo Z (2012) Electropolymerized polyaniline
stabilized tungsten oxide nanocomposite films: Electrochromic behavior and
electrochemical energy storage. J Phys Chem C 116:25052–25064
32. Wei H, Yan X, Wu S, et al. (2012) Electropolymerized Polyaniline Stabilized Tungsten
Oxide Nanocomposite Films : Electrochromic Behavior and Electrochemical Energy
Storage. J Phys Chem C 116:25052–25064.
33. Nwanya AC, Jafta CJ, Ejikeme PM, Ugwuoke PE, Reddy MV, Osuji RU, Ozoemena KI,
Ezema FI (2014) Electrochromic and electrochemical capacitive properties of tungsten
oxide and its polyaniline nanocomposite films obtained by chemical bath deposition
method. Electrochim Acta 128:218–225
34. Tian Y, Cong S, Su W, Chen H, Li Q, Geng F, Zhao Z (2014) Synergy of W18O49 and
polyaniline for smart supercapacitor electrode integrated with energy level indicating
functionality. Nano Lett 14:2150−2156
35. Zou B-X, Liang Y, Liu X-X, Diamond D, Lau K-T (2011) Electrodeposition and
pseudocapacitive properties of tungsten oxide/polyaniline composite. J Power Sources
196:4842–4848
36. Chang K-H, Hu C-C, Huang C-M, Liu Y-L, Chang C-I (2011) Microwave-assisted
hydrothermal synthesis of crystalline WO3-WO3·0.5H2O mixtures for pseudocapacitors
of the asymmetric type. J Power Sources 196:2387–2392
37. Sopčić S, Kraljić-Roković M, Mandić Z, Inzelt G (2010) Preparation and characterization
of RuO2/polyaniline composite electrodes. J Solid State Electrochem 14:2021–2026
15
Tables
Table 1
Material Preparation
method
Charge - discharge measurement Cyclic voltammetry
Reference Potential
window Current density
Specific
capacitance
Potential
window Sweep rate
Specific
capacitance
WO3 Spin-coating n.a. n.a. n.a. -1.0 - 1.0 V 50 - 1000 mV s-1 240 - 90 F cm-2 [31]
WO3 Sol-gel method -0.2 - 0.8 V 0.008 - 0.16 mA cm-2 n.a. -0.5 - 0.8 V 5 - 100 mV s-1 2 - 2 mF cm-2 [32]
WO3 Chemical bath
deposition -0.2 - 1.0 V 0.02 mA cm-2 2.8 mF cm-2 -0.5 - 0.7 V 50 mV s-1 4 mF cm-2 [33]
W18O49 Solvothermal
synthesis -0.5 - 0.0 V 0.08 - 0.7 mA cm-2 25 - 17.5 mF cm-2 n.a. n.a. n.a. [34]
WO3 Potentiodynamic
deposition -0.5 - 0.7 V 0.5 - 5.0 A g-1 75 - 30 F g-1 n.a. n.a. n.a. [35]
WO3
Microwave
assisted hydrothermal
synthesis
n.a. n.a. n.a. -0.6 - 0.2 V 25 - 200 mV s-1 293 - 200 F g-1 [36]
WO3-x Template
assisted chemical
synthesis
-0.1 - 0.8 V 1 - 20 mA cm-2
18.4 - 10 F g-1
n.a. n.a. n.a. [8] m-WO3-x 199 -144 F g-1
m-WO3 110 - 75 F g-1
h-WO3 Hydrothermal
synthesis -0.5 - 0.0 V 0.5 - 5.0 A g-1 421.8 - 311 F g-1 -0.5 - 0.0 V 2 - 20 mV s-1 417.8 - 201.9 F g-1 [9]
h-WO3 nanowire
array
Hydrothermal
synthesis -0.6 - 0.3 V 0.5 - 8.0 A g-1 680 - 240 F g-1 n.a. n.a. n.a. [10]
PANI Potentiodynamic
deposition -0.5 - 0.7 V 0.5 - 5.0 A g-1 160 - 135 F g-1 n.a. n.a. n.a. [35]
PANI Potentiodynamic
deposition -0.2 - 0.8 V 0.008 - 0.16 mA cm-2 n.a. -0.5 - 0.8 V 5 - 100 mV s-1 75 - 12 mF cm-2 [32]
PANI Chemical
synthesis -0.4 - 0.8 V 0.02 mA cm-2 9.2 mF cm-2 -0.5 - 0.7 V 50 mV s-1 17 mF cm-2 [33]
PANI Galvanostatic
deposition 0.0 - 0.8 V 0.08 - 0.7 mA cm-2 10 - 7.5 mF cm-2 n.a. n.a. n.a. [34]
WO3/PANI
Potentiodynamic
codeposition on
carbon cloth
-0.5 - 0.7 V 0.5 - 5.0 A g-1 168 - 120 F g-1 n.a. n.a. n.a. [35]
WO3/PANI
Chemical
synthesis on
WO3 prepared via chemical
bath deposition
-0.2 - 0.8 V 0.02 mA cm-2 4.1 mF cm-2 -0.5 - 0.7 V 50 mV s-1 10 mF cm-2 [33]
WO3/PANI
Potentiodynamic
deposition on WO3 prepared
via sol-gel
method
-0.2 - 0.8 V 0.008 - 0.16 mA cm-2 12 - 4 mF cm-2 -0.5 - 0.8 V 5 - 100 mV s-1 25 - 9 mF cm-2 [32]
W18O49/PANI
Galvanostatic
electrodeposition
on chemically prepared W18O49
-0.5 - 0.8 V 0.08 - 0.7 mA cm-2 5 mF cm-2 n.a. n.a. n.a. [34]
16
Figures
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
B 60 V
50 V
40 V
C / m
F c
m-2
I / mA
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
j /
mA
cm
-2
E / V
10 mV s-1
25 mV s-1
50 mV s-1
100 mV s-1
A
17
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
A
j / m
A c
m-2
E / V
1. cycle
2. cycle
3. cycle
4. cycle
5. cycle
0 2 4 6 8 10
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
B
Qpol /
mC
Polymerization Cycle Number
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
C
j / m
A c
m-2
E / V
WO3
1 cycle PANI
3 cycles PANI
5 cycles PANI
10 cycles PANI
40 V 50 V 60 V
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
D
j /
mA
cm
-2
E / V
WO3
PANI
WO3/PANI
12 m
A c
m-2
5 m
A c
m-2
26 m
A c
m-2
18
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
A
j / m
A c
m-2
E / V
10 mV s-1
25 mV s-1
50 mV s-1
100 mV s-1
0 20 40 60 80 100-8
-4
0
4
8
12
j /
mA
cm
-2
/ mV s-1
A B
D
C
E
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
-25
0
25
50
j /
mA
m-2
E / V
10 mV s-1
25 mV s-1
50 mV s-1
100 mV s-1
B
2 4 6 8 10
-20
0
20
40
j / m
A c
m-2
/ (mV s-1)
0.5
19
Figure 8.
Figure 9.
Figure 10.
0 2 4 6 8 10
0
100
200
300
400AC
norm
, P
AN
I / F
g-1
Deposition cycle number
0 2 4 6 8 10
0
40
80
120
160
200
B
Cn
orm
, P
AN
I / m
F c
m-2
Deposition cycle number
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
A
E / V
t / sec
0 40 80 120 160 200
0
10
20
30
40
B
Cnorm
, P
AN
I / m
F c
m-2
Cycle number
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20A
j /
mA
cm
-2
E / V
WO3
1 cycle PANI
3 cycles PANI
5 cycles PANI
7 cycles PANI
10 cycles PANI
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
B
E / V
t / sec
WO3
1 cycle PANI
3 cycles PANI
5 cycles PANI
7 cycles PANI
10 cycles PANI
20
Captions
Table 1. Representative examples of WO3 and PANI based materials and their charge storage
properties.
Figure 1. Anodization curves of distinct W foils registered at 60 V in 0.15 M NaF (A).
Anodization curves of W foils at different voltages in 0.15 M NaF (B). The inset shows the
voltage sweep section with a rate of 500 mV s-1 in both cases.
Figure 2. Cyclic voltammograms recorded in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at different sweep rates for
WO3 samples anodized at 60 V (A). Panel (B) shows the effect of preparation voltage on the
areal capacitance of WO3 samples (as derived from galvanostatic charge-discharge
measurements).
Figure 3. SEM images of heat treated WO3 samples prepared with different anodization
voltages.
Figure 4. Potentiodynamic deposition of PANI for 5 cycles on nanoporous WO3 (A), the
variation of polymerization charge with increasing cycle number (B), recorded CVs in 0.5 M
H2SO4 solution at 50 mV s-1 sweep rate for samples prepared with different PANI loadings (C),
and comparison of the voltammetric behavior of WO3, PANI, and WO3/PANI samples under
the same condition (D).
Figure 5. Cyclic voltammograms recorded in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at different sweep rates for
WO3/PANI samples prepared with 3 cycles (A) and 10 cycles of potentiodynamic
polymerization. The insets in Figs. 5A and 5B show the linear dependence of the PANI related
anodic and cathodic peak current densities on the potential sweep rate (A) and square root of
the sweep rate (B) respectively.
Figure 6. SEM images of pristine WO3 (A) and four WO3/PANI hybrids prepared by 1, 3, 5
and 10 potentiodynamic cycles of (B, C, D and E).
0 2 4 6 8 10
250
300
350
400
450
500
60 V
50 V
40 V
C / F
g-1
Deposition cycle number
21
Figure 7. The variation of the PANI associated specific capacitance (at a charging/discharging
current of 0.4 mA) with the number of deposition cycles. The specific capacitance was
normalized with the deposited polymer mass (A) and the geometric area of the electrode
exposed to the solution (B).
Figure 8. Stability evaluation of the hybrid material prepared by 3 potentiodynamic cycles on
a nanoporous WO3 host prepared at 60 V. Specific capacitance values (B) determined from 200
galvanostatic charge-discharge curves (A) were recorded at a charging/discharging current of
0.5 mA.
Figure 9. CVs recorded at 50 mV s-1 sweep rate for WO3/PANI hybrids prepared by
consecutive potentiodynamic deposition, where the summary of the total preparation cycle
numbers is denoted (A) and the related charge-discharge measurements carried out at a 0.4 mA
charging/discharging current.
Figure 10. The variation of the PANI associated specific capacitance (at a charging/discharging
current of 0.4 mA) with the number of deposition cycles for WO3 hosts anodized at different
voltages.