Enige Informatie Over Luit, Tablatuur &

Toondichters (althans deze uit de Barok die voor dit Instrument Componeerden)

zoals aangetroffen in Grove Music Online

voor

de

liefhebbers

❦

Lute

(Arab. ‘ūd; Fr. luth; Ger. Laute; It. lauto, leuto, liuto; Sp. laúd).

A plucked chordophone, made of wood, of Middle Eastern origin (see ‘Ud) which flourished throughout Europe from medieval times to the 18th century. Broader, generic uses of the term are discussed in §1.

KLAUS WACHSMANN (1), JAMES W. McKINNON, ROBERT ANDERSON (2), IAN HAR-WOOD, DIANA POULTON/DAVID VAN EDWARDS (3–4), LYNDA SAYCE (5), DIANA POULTON/TIM CRAWFORD (6–8)

1. The generic term.

In the Hornbostel-Sachs classification system (Sachs and Hornbostel, A1914) the term ‘lute’ covers those ‘composite chordophones’ – string instruments in which a string bearer and a resonator are ‘organically united’ and cannot be separated without destroying the instrument – in which the plane of the string runs parallel with the soundtable (figs.1 and 2). This definition excludes harps and zithers but includes pluriarcs (or bow lutes) (see Gabon, fig.2), lyres of various sorts and ‘handle lutes’ proper. The following excerpt from Hornbostel and Sachs (from the GSJ translation, with minor alterations) shows the classification of handle lutes (for their complete classification of lute types see Chordophone):

321.3 Handle lutes: the string bearer is a plain handle; subsidiary necks, as e.g. in the Indian prasārinī vīnā are disregarded, as are also lutes with strings distributed over several necks, like the harpo-lyre, and those like the lyre-guitars, in which the yoke is merely ornamental

321.31 Spike lutes: the handle passes diametrically through the resonator

321.311 Spike bowl lutes: the resonator consists of a natural or carved-out bowl – found in Persia [now Iran], India, Indonesia

321.312 Spike box lutes or spike guitars: the resonator is built up from wood – found in Egypt (rabāb)

321.313 Spike tube lutes: the handle passes diametrically through the walls of a tube – found in Chi-na, Indochina [now Vietnam]

321.32 Necked lutes: the handle is attached to or carved from the resonator, like a neck

321.321 Necked bowl lutes (mandolin, theorbo, balalaika)

321.322 Necked box lutes or necked guitars: (violin, viol, guitar) NB a lute whose body is built up in the shape of a bowl is classified as a bowl lute

321.33 Tanged lutes: the handle ends within the body resonator

Common usage also excludes bowed instruments (such as the violin). However, the Hornbostel-Sachs classification provides suffixes for use with any division of the class of chordophones to in-dicate the method of sounding; thus, for example, a violin if played with a bow is classified as a bowed lute.

Spike lutes and necked lutes differ from each other by the manner in which neck and resonator are assembled. Fig.3 illustrates possibilities of assembly as found in a series of instruments of the lute

❧ 2

family (played with a bow) from the Indonesian island of Sulawesi. If the neck clearly passes through the resonator, as it does in the first four examples, the label ‘spiked lute’ applies. But in six cases the handle is ‘attached’, and in this sense the instruments are ‘necked lutes’. However, the examples show that there are several transitional forms to which neither label applies well; hence a third category has been added to the Hornbostel-Sachs classification above, under the code 321.33, for instruments in which, as Hornbostel himself described it, ‘the handle ends within the body’.

Sachs ascribed the earliest types to a period from the 4th to the 2nd millennium bce, basing his conclusion on cultural geography. Seen in the perspective of human development, lutes are in any event a comparatively late invention. Because the use of a bow to play string instruments is even more recent – the earliest documentation dates from around the end of the 1st millennium ce – the discussion of ancient lutes in §2 deals exclusively with plucked instruments.

2. Ancient lutes.

Two types of ancient lute are clearly distinguishable: the earlier long-necked lute and the short-necked lute. There is a wide range of difference within each type, but the most common features of the long-necked lute are an unfretted, rod-like neck and a small oval or almond-shaped body, which before the advent of wood construction was fashioned from a gourd or tortoise shell. In many early examples where the table is of hide, the neck or spike is attached to it by piercing it a number of times in the manner of stitching. The strings, usually two, are attached at the lower end of the spike in varying ways and are bound at the top by ligatures from which hang decorative tas-sels. Pegs were not used until comparatively late in the instrument's history.

The long-necked lute is now thought (by Turnbull and Picken, for example) to have originated among the West Semites of Syria. Turnbull (A1972) has argued convincingly for its earliest appea-rance being that on two cylinder seals (fig.4a ) of the Akkadian period (c2370–2110 bce); on one the lute is in the hands of a crouching male who plays while a birdman is brought before a seated god. In contrast to the draped female harpists, the lutenists of early Mesopotamia are men, some-times shown naked or with animals. None of these instruments has survived, but the lute's popu-larity is attested by many objects of the Babylonian period. The Louvre possesses a Babylonian boundary stone, found at Susa, which shows bearded men with bows on their backs playing the lute in the company of such animals as the lion, panther, antelope, horse, sheep, ox, and an ostrich. In the the early 2nd millennium bce the lute is also attested for the Hittite Old Kingdom: a sherd from Alishar Höyük has preserved the end of a neck with two strings hanging from it.

The lute first appeared in Egypt as a result of Hyksos influence, which opened the country to Wes-tern Asiatic ideas. In the New Kingdom (1550–1070 bce) the long-necked lute was often represen-ted in banquet scenes, played either by men or women. The two main types of instrument, with round (usually a tortoise shell) or oval soundbox, appear in a scene now at the British Museum showing details of the frets and soundholes as well as the plectrum. The earliest Egyptian evidence of the lute to survive is a soundbox now in the Metropolitan Museum, New York, and there is a well-preserved instrument from the Theban tomb of the singer Harmose in the Cairo Museum (Dynasty 18, 1550–1320). The lute had a function in ritual processions such as those depicted in the Luxor temple at the festival of Opet, when a number of players performed together. It ap-peared more often, though, in the chamber groups that featured at court functions and official banquets. The end of the neck is sometimes carved with the head of a goose or falcon. This proba-bly had religious significance, as is clearly the case when a Hathor head is carved. The dwarf-god Bes, himself probably of Asiatic origin, is an adept at the lute, and satirical scenes show it in the hands of a crocodile.

3

Greco-Roman lutes (see Pandoura), which are depicted in a number of Hellenistic sculptures and on late Roman sarcophagi, are comparatively rare. They appear to have at least three strings, plucked with the fingers, and a thick unfretted neck. (The evidence indicating this last feature, ho-wever, may be influenced by the sculpture medium.) One depiction, a terracotta in the Louvre (see fig.4c), shows the body tapering to form the neck in the manner of the short-necked lute. The sur-viving representations from Byzantium, most notably a 5th-century mosaic from the former im-perial palace of Istanbul and a 6th-century mosaic from a church near Shahhat, Libya, show lutes of the pandoura type.

The short-necked lute, which is characterized by a wooden body tapering off to form the neck and fingerboard, probably also originated in Asia. There are only rare representations of it until the first centuries bce. A number of statuettes and reliefs (see Geiringer, A1927–8, pls.1–3) are preser-ved from the Gandhara culture of the time, named from an area in north-west India under the influence of Greek civilization; these show short-necked lutes with a pear-shaped body, a frontal string-holder, lateral pegs and four or five strings plucked with a plectrum. The Sassanid lute or barbat, as shown on a 6th-century silver cup from Kalar Dasht, was of this type. Apparently these instruments are related to those lutes that spread eastwards to China and Japan, as well as to the Arabian ‘ūd, the immediate ancestor of the European classical lute.

3. Structure of the Western lute.

The structure of the Western lute evolved gradually away from its ancestor the Arabian ‘ūd, though some features have remained sufficiently consistent to constitute defining characteristics. Chief among these are: a vaulted back, pear-shaped in outline and more or less semicircular in cross-section, made up of a number of separate ribs; a neck and fingerboard tied with gut frets; a flat soundboard or belly in which is carved an ornate soundhole or ‘rose’; a bridge, to which the strings are attached, glued near the lower end of the soundboard; a pegbox, usually at nearly a right angle to the neck, with tuning-pegs inserted laterally; and strings of gut, usually arranged in paired courses.

The ribs, of which the body is constructed, are thin (typically about 1·5 mm) strips of wood, bent over a mould and glued together edge to edge to form a symmetrical shell. Although the overall sizes of lutes vary considerably, there is much less variation in the thicknesses of their constituent parts, and even very large lutes have ribs of less than 2 mm. The glue joints between the ribs are reinforced inside with narrow strips of paper or parchment. Many surviving lutes also have five or six strips of, usually, parchment glued round inside the bowl across the line of the ribs. The num-ber of ribs varies according to date and style from only seven to up to 65, but it is always an odd number because lute backs are built outwards from a single central rib. Many kinds of wood, even sometimes ivory, have been used for the back. Maple and yew were the favoured local woods but exotic woods from South America and East Asia, such as rosewood, kingwood and ebony, were used as they became available in the 16th century. The extent of their use by 1566 is revealed in the inventory of Raimund Fugger (see Smith, B1980). At the lower end, where these ribs taper to-gether, they are reinforced internally with a strip of softwood bent to fit, and externally with a capping strip, usually of the same material as the ribs. At the other end the ribs are glued to a block, often of softwood, to which the neck is attached. In most pictures of medieval lutes up to about 1500, as in the early ‘ūd, the ribs are shown as flowing in a smooth curve into the line of the neck and in these cases the end of the neck itself, suitably rebated, may have formed the block to which the ribs were glued. However, by 1360 there are already some pictures showing lutes with a sharp angle between neck and body, implying that the separate block, which is universally present in surviving lutes, was not unknown. The overlap of these two forms spanned at least 200 years; both forms are depicted in The Last Judgement by Hieronymus Bosch (c1500, Vienna Academy). In

❧ 4

the later two-part construction the joint is a simple glued butt joint, secured with one or more nails driven through the block into the end-grain of the neck. This simple joint proved adequate during the remainder of the lute's history.

Most surviving lutes from the early 16th century have been re-necked in later styles but icono-graphical sources reveal that early necks appear most often to have been made of a single piece of hardwood such as sycamore or maple to match the body. In later and surviving lutes after about 1580, the neck is most often veneered in a decorative hardwood, often ebony, sometimes striped or inlaid with ivory, on a core of sycamore or other common hardwood. At first, throughout the me-dieval period and into the Renaissance, necks were semicircular or deeper in cross-section. As the number of courses increased through the 16th and 17th centuries, the necks became correspon-dingly wider, necessitating a change of left-hand position to enable stretches across to the bass strings. This meant that a thinner neck was more comfortable. Baron (C1727) commented that Johann Christian Hoffmann (1683–1750) made the necks of his lutes to fit the hand of their ow-ner, unlike his father Martin Hoffmann (1653–1719), who made his necks too thick.

Separate fingerboards are often not very apparent in pictures of medieval lutes, leading to the sup-position that they were either made of boxwood or simply constituted the flat top surface of the neck. Sometimes when there is a marked change of colour between the ‘fingerboard’ and the soundboard, the join occurs so far down the soundboard as to be beyond any possible neck block; a separate fingerboard is therefore structurally impossible. Instead, the change of colour must re-sult from a protective coat of something like varnish. Surviving lutes from the 1580s onwards al-most universally have separate ebony fingerboards set flush with the soundboard and, after about 1600, usually with separate ‘points’ decorating the joint between the fingerboard and soundboard (fig.5). The lutes of Tielke in the 18th century often had multiple ‘points’ (see G. Hellwig, B1980). Medieval and Renaissance lute fingerboards were usually flat, even the wide chitarrone and theor-bo fingerboards, but from about 1700 makers started to give a curve to their fingerboards, helping the lie of the frets and making fingering easier.

At the back of the top end of the neck a rebate is cut out to form a housing for the pegbox. This same design of joint, with or without a reinforcing nail into the end-grain of the neck, was used throughout the history of the lute, as was the basic form of the pegbox: a straight-sided box, closed at the back, open at the front and tapering slightly in both width and depth. However, after about 1595 various branches of the lute family also developed different and characteristic pegbox forms in order to accommodate the longer bass strings needed to extend the range of the lute down-wards. Slender tapering hardwood tuning-pegs were inserted from the sides. Medieval pegs appear often to have been made of boxwood, but later, in the 17th and 18th centuries, fruitwood such as plum seems to have been a preferred material, though these were often stained black.

The soundboard is a flat straight-grained softwood plate, nowadays mostly thought of as Picea abies or Picea excelsa (though historically the types of wood used may have included species of Pinus and Abies) into which is carved an ornamental rose soundhole, whose pattern often shows decidedly Arabic influence (see Wells, D1981). However, it is noticeable that iconography does not support a continuous tradition of rose design from the Arabic ‘ūd; most medieval pictures of lutes feature gothic designs, and the frequency of Arabic patterns in the later surviving lutes may reflect rather the contemporary interest in such designs by artists such as Leonardo da Vinci and Dürer. The soundboard is often made from the two halves joined along the centre line, but on larger instru-ments several pieces may be used. Most surviving lute soundboards are quite thin, often about 1·5 mm. However, there is some support for the view that the very earliest soundboards, dating from about 1540, may have been rather thicker, and that they were made progressively thinner as the number of the supporting bars was increased (see Nurse, D1986). Early lutes from before the

5

1590s usually had no edging to the soundboard. After that, often an ebony or hardwood strip was rebated into half the depth of the soundboard edge as a protective measure. Later still, when the fashion for re-using old soundboards was in sway (see Lowe, B1976), a ‘lace’ of parchment or cloth with silver threads was often used to wrap the edge, possibly to cover pre-existing wear.

Bridge designs went through a slow evolution, particularly in the shape of the decorative ‘ears’ which terminate both ends, but were consistently made of a light hardwood such as pear, plum or walnut, sometimes stained black, and were glued directly to the surface of the soundboard. Their cross-sectional design was very cleverly arranged to minimize stress at the junction with the thin and flexible soundboard. Holes drilled through the bridge took the strings, which were tied so that they were supported by a loop of the same string rather than by a saddle as in the modern guitar. This has a marked effect on the tone of the instrument, and contributes to the sweetness of the lu-te's sound.

The tension of the strings, because they are pulling directly on the soundboard, tends to cause it to distort. This is resisted by a number of transverse bars of the same wood as the soundboard, glued on edge across its underside. These bars, besides supporting the soundboard, have an important effect on the sound quality. By dividing the soundboard into a number of sections, each with a re-latively high resonant frequency, they cause it to reinforce the upper harmonics produced by a string rather than its fundamental tone. This is matched by the strings themselves, which are quite thin compared with those of a modern guitar; a thin string tuned to a certain note produces more high harmonics than a thicker string tuned to the same note. Thus the whole acoustical system of the lute is designed to give a characteristically clear, almost nasal, sound (see also Acoustics, §II, 8).

4. History.

The European lute derives both in name and form from the Arab instrument known as the ‘Ūd, which means literally ‘the wood’ (either because it had a soundboard of wood as distinct from a parchment skin stretched over the body, or because the body itself was built up from wooden strips rather than made from a hollow gourd). The Arab ‘ūd was introduced into Europe by the Moors during their conquest and occupation of Spain (711–1492). Pictorial evidence shows Moorish ‘ūd players, and 9th- and 10th-century accounts tell of visits of famous players such as Ziryāb to the court of the Andalusian emir ‘Abd al-Rahmān II (822–52). The ‘ūd was not confined to Muslims, however, as is shown by illustrations to the Cantigas de Santa María of Alfonso el Sabio (1221–84) which include players in distinctive Christian costume (fig.6). However, from pictorial and written evidence it is clear that by 1350 what we must now call lutes, since there is no longer any connection with Arab musicians, had spread very widely throughout Europe, even though trading and cultural links with Moorish Spain were not well developed. We need to look elsewhere for a route that would lead to the eventual domination of European lute making by numerous German families who came originally from around the Lech valley region and Bavaria. Bletscha-cher (B1978) has argued that this was due largely to the royal visits of Friedrich II with his magni-ficent Moorish Sicilian retinue to the towns in this valley between 1218 and 1237. The valley was a main north–south trading route across the Alps, with the necessary raw materials growing there in abundance, so it would have been a natural focus for any such development to occur, even more so following the Venetians' capture of Constantinople in 1204 which so greatly increased their tra-ding activities with the Near East. The ‘ūd is still in use although it no longer has frets. Over the centuries it has undergone structural changes analogous to those of the lute, and thus differs from both the original ‘ūd and the medieval lute.

As no lutes from before the 16th century have survived, information must be gathered from pictu-res, sculpture and written descriptions. These indicate that the lute has usually had its strings in

❧ 6

pairs, and that at first there were only four such ‘courses’ (fig.7). From the start, lutes were made in widely different sizes, and therefore of different pitches. Both pictorial and written evidence point to the use of different sized lutes for treble and ground duet performance (see Polk, F1992). Du-ring the 15th century a fifth course was added. Masaccio depicted two five-course lutes in his al-tarpiece, Virgin and Child (1426; now in the National Gallery, London). Later, in his De inventione et usu musicae (c1481–3), Tinctoris mentioned a sixth course and there are even tablatures from this period calling for a seven-course lute, though no contemporaneous pictures show one.

The earliest extant account of structural details for the European lute is in a manuscript of about 1440 written by Henri Arnaut de Zwolle (see Harwood, D1960). Arnaut described both the lute itself and the mould on which it was built, combining the two in the same diagram (fig.8). His de-sign was unmeasured but instead was worked out in terms of geometrical proportion, including the positions of bridge, soundhole and three transverse bars. Almost 200 years later, Mersenne (1636) described the design and construction of a lute by remarkably similar methods. By this time the number of soundboard bars had doubled, but the placing of three of them, as well as that of the soundhole and bridge, corresponds with that given by Arnaut. There can be no doubt that there was a well-established tradition of instrument design by geometrical methods, going back to the ‘ūd at least as far as the 9th and 10th centuries (see Bouterse, D1979). It is perhaps significant that a portrait (1562) of the lute maker Gaspar Tieffenbrucker surrounded by his lutes and other instruments shows him holding a pair of dividers. However, when Arnaut's design is compared to lutes shown in most paintings of the period, it is in fact rather different, being oddly rounded at the top of the body. The very long neck he specifies is almost never shown. This suggests that, as an enquiring scholar, he may have been given the general principles of design by the lute maker(s) he consulted, but not the exact relationships which determine the precise shape and which may have been regarded as a craft secret.

Medieval lutes usually had two circular roses, one large and more or less halfway between the bridge and the neck, as specified by Arnaut, the other much smaller and higher up the body close to the fingerboard. The large rose was occasionally of the ornate ‘sunken’ variety, often with de-signs similar to some gothic cathedral windows. This may have been intentional, for Arnaut calls the rose in his drawing ‘Fenestrum’. Around 1480 there was even a brief fashion for the upper rose to be in the form of a lancet window, and interestingly just such a rose has survived in the clavicy-therium now in the RCM, London, which has been dated to about 1480 (see E. Wells: ‘The London Clavicytherium’, EMc, vi, 1978, pp.568–71).

The ‘ūd was, and still is, played with a plectrum, and at first the same method was used for the lute (see figs.4 and 5). With this technique it was probably mainly a melodic instrument, playing a sin-gle line of music, albeit highly ornate, with perhaps strummed chords at important points. Howe-ver, some of the very early plectra are shown as large and solid looking, implying that the lute may also have been used as a percussive rhythm instrument rather like the Romanian cobză, which clo-sely resembles the very early medieval lute, especially in the wide spacing of the strings at the bridge and the shortness of the steeply tapering neck (see Lloyd, B1960). This may explain the early drone tunings (see §5 below).

During the second half of the 15th century, there was a change to playing with the fingertips, though, as Page (B1981) pointed out, the two methods continued for some time side by side. Tinc-toris (c1481–3) wrote of holding the lute ‘while the strings are struck by the right hand either with the fingers or with a plectrum’, but did not imply that the use of the fingers was a novelty. Howe-ver, the change was very significant for the lute's future development, for it allowed the playing of several parts at once, and meant that the huge repertory of vocal part music both sacred and secu-lar became available to lute players. This function was made easier by the invention about this

7

time of special systems of notation known as tablature, into which much of this repertory was transcribed (intabulated). There were three main kinds of tablature for the lute, developed in Germany, France and Italy respectively. A fourth early system, ‘Intavolatura alla Napolitana’, was also used from time to time. Of the four main types the French may have been the earliest. The German one was probably written during the lifetime of Conrad Paumann (c1410–1473), the sup-posed inventor of the system. Although Tinctoris had mentioned a six-course lute, these first ta-blatures, and indeed the very names by which the strings of the instrument were known, suggest five courses as still the most usual number at this time.

By about 1500 a sixth course was commonly in use, which extended the range of the open strings by another 4th to two octaves. This may have been enabled by improvements in string making. Gut was used for all the strings and it was usual on the two or three lowest courses to set one of the pair with a thin string tuned an octave higher, to lend some brilliance to the tone of its thick neighbour.

By 1500 the first written records confirm the existence of several lute-making families in and around Füssen in the Lech valley. Most of the famous names of 16th- and 17th-century lute ma-king seem to have originated from around this small area of southern Germany. By 1562 the Füs-sen makers were sufficiently well established to form a guild with elaborate regulations which have survived (see Bletschacher, B1978, and Layer, B1978). A careful reading of these regulations reveals how much they were predicated on the idea of export. They also show an organized tendency to keep the trade within individual families, which resulted in much intermarriage. This was a po-werful force for continuity which clearly lasted for centuries. However, the number of masters who could set up a workshop in the town was limited to 20, so there was a built-in pressure to emigra-te. It was also precisely this area which was devastated first by the Peasants' Revolt of 1525, the war against the Schmalkaldic League (1546–55), and finally by the Thirty Years War which killed more than half the population of central Europe. It is hardly surprising that lute makers, who already had international connections, moved away from the area in such numbers.

Many settled in northern Italy, no doubt attracted by the country's wealth and fashion but also perhaps by the access to exotic woods imported via Venice. The tradition of intermarriage meant that they remained together in colonies and did not become much integrated into Italian society. Luca Maler (see Maler) was active in Bologna from about 1503; by 1530 he was a property owner of considerable substance and had built up an almost industrial scale workshop employing mostly German craftsmen (see Pasqual and Ragazzi, B1998). The inventory compiled at his death in 1552 lists about 1100 finished lutes and more than 1300 soundboards ready for use; his firm continued trading until 1613. Among several other lute makers in Bologna were marx Unverdorben (briefly) and hans Frei. The main characteristic of their lutes is a long narrow body of nine or 11 broad ribs with rather straight shoulders and fairly round at the base. This form is remarkably close to that proposed by Bouterse (D1979) in his interpretation of Persian and Arabic manuscripts of the 14th century. The chief difference is that these Middle Eastern descriptions, like Arnaut's, indicate a semicircular cross-section, whereas the instruments of Maler and Frei are somewhat ‘more square’. Often made from sycamore or ash, they remained highly prized as long as the lute was in use, but became increasingly rare as time went on. No unaltered example is known to have survived, for their prestige was such that they were adapted (sometimes more than once) to keep abreast of new fashions. They have all been fitted with replacement necks to carry more strings; sometimes the vaulted back is the only original part remaining (see Downing, B1978).

In Venice, as in Bologna, the German colony kept to its own quarter and had its own church. By 1521 Ulrich Tieffenbrucker is recorded as present in the city, and for the next hundred years the Tieffenbrucker family, especially Magno (i), Magno (ii) and Moisé, as well as Marx Unverdorben

❧ 8

and Luca Maler's brother, Sigismond, dominated lute making in the city (see Toffolo, B1987). The name Tieffenbrucker was taken from their original village of Tieffenbruck, but their instruments are usually signed Dieffopruchar and regional spellings abound with variants such as Duiffoprug-car and even Dubrocard. Another branch of the Tieffenbrucker family settled in Padua, including ‘Wendelio Venere’, who has recently been discovered to be Wendelin Tieffenbrucker, probably the son of Leonardo Tieffenbrucker the elder. michael Hartung also worked in Padua and may have been taught by Wendelin, although Baron (C1727) stated that he was apprenticed to Leonardo the younger. The typical body shape of these Venetian and Paduan lutes was less elongated than that of Maler's and Frei's instruments, and the shoulders were more curved (fig.10a, c–f ). The first examples had 11 or 13 ribs, but later the number was increased, a feature associated with, but not exclusive to, the use of yew, which has a brown heartwood and a narrow white sapwood. For pur-poses of decoration, each rib was cut half light, half dark, which restricted the available width and required a large number of ribs, sometimes totalling 51 and even more. The yew wood was sup-plied from the old heartland of lute making in south Germany, and cutting the ribs for Venetian makers became a valuable source of winter employment there (see Layer, B1978).

The use of geometrical methods of lute design has already been mentioned, and it has been found by several writers that the shape of these instruments can be readily reproduced by such means (see Edwards, D1973; D. Abbott and E. Segerman: ‘The Geometric Description and Analysis of In-strument Shapes’, FoMRHI Quarterly, no.2, 1976, p.7; Söhne, D1980; Samson, D1981; and Coates, D1985). This may account for the similarity in basic form between instruments of different sizes and by different makers. By comparison with the modern guitar, these early lutes, whether of the Bolognese or Paduan type, are distinguished by the lightness of their construction. The egg-like shape of the lute body is inherently strong and does not need to be built of very thick materials. Although the total tension of up to 24 gut strings (for later lutes) can be as much as 70–80 kg, the well-barred thin soundboard withstands this pull remarkably well. Though in the 17th century, as Constantijn Huygens's correspondence makes clear, it was routine to re-bar old lutes as part of their renovation, this may have had more to do with alterations in barring layout than structural weaknesses.

The instruction to tune the top string as high as it will stand without breaking is given in many early lute tutors (though not by Dowland or Mace). If the highest string is lowered for safety's sake much beneath its breaking point, the basses will be either too thick and stiff or, if thinner, too slack to produce an acceptable sound. Wire-wound bass strings which could ease this dilemma by in-creasing the weight without increasing the stiffness are not known to have been available until af-ter 1650, and were apparently not much used thereafter either. Therefore, as the breaking pitch of a string depends on its length but not on its thickness, the working level of a given instrument is fixed within quite narrow limits.

In the second half of the 16th century there was a tendency to build instruments in families of si-zes (and thus pitches), roughly corresponding with the different types of human voice. The lute was no exception. Examples of the variety of sizes available around 1600 are shown in fig.10. The instrument by Magno Tieffenbrucker (fig.10a) has a string length of 67 cm; the string lengths of the instruments shown as fig.10c–g are 29·9 cm, 44 cm, 44·2 cm, 66·6 cm, and 93·8 cm. Strictly speaking, the smallest of these (fig.10c) should be called a Mandore (see also Mandolin, §1). In England the nominal a' or g' lute was known as the ‘mean’, and was the size intended in most of the books of ayres, unless otherwise specified. The only other names used in English musical sources are ‘bass’ (nominally at d') and ‘treble’, which is specified for the Morley and Rosseter Consort Les-sons. The pitch of these ‘treble’ lutes implied by the other parts was also g' but it is possible that this music was intended to be played at a pitch level a 4th higher than that of the mean lute (see Har-wood, B1981). This nomenclature of ‘treble’ has caused some interest and, taken together with a

9

number of specifically English pictures of small-bodied long-necked lutes, may indicate a particu-lar English variant (see Forrester, B1994).

It should be noted that although all sorts of sizes were available at most times, the general trend from 1600 to 1750 was towards larger instruments for common use. Thus, for example, we might expect Dowland's songs to be accompanied on a lute of about 58 cm string length tuned to a no-minal g' or a', whereas most French Baroque music of the mid-17th century calls for an 11-course lute of about 67 cm with a top string at a nominal f', while the lutes used in Germany in the 18th century were mostly 13-course instruments of about 70–73 cm, also with a nominal top string of f'. Some of this may represent a drop in the pitch standard, but we must also assume that string makers had managed to improve their products to increase the total range available, since these size changes represent considerable changes in the instruments' requirements. Apart from the de-velopment of overwound strings, this increase in range could only have been achieved by increa-sing the tensile strength of the trebles, by making the thick basses more elastic and flexible or by increasing the density of bass strings, perhaps by the addition of metallic compounds (see Peruffo, D1991). There is currently much interest in trying to reproduce these conjectured developments. It is noticeable from written accounts that the cost of strings was remarkably high compared to that of the lutes themselves, leading to the thought that there was more to their manufacture than is now apparent.

Although seven-course lutes appear as early as the late 15th century, and Bakfark's apprentice, Hans Timme, wanted to buy an Italian seven-course lute as early as 1556 (see Gombosi, F1935), it was only in the 1580s that they became at all common with the seventh course pitched at either a tone or a 4th below the sixth (see §5 below). Improved strings are conjectured to have popularized this greater range, perhaps providing a better tone and enabling John Dowland, in his contribution to his son Robert's Varietie of Lute Lessons (1610), to recommend a unison sixth course:

Secondly, set on your Bases, in that place which you call the sixt string, or γ ut, these Bases must be both of one bignes, yet it hath beene a generall custome (although not so much used any where as here in England) to set a small and a great string together, but amongst learned Musitians that custome is left, as irregular to the rules of Musicke.

The same book, reflecting the growing tendency to increase the number of bass strings, included English and continental music for lutes with six, seven, eight and nine courses. This only occasi-onally extended the range to low C; mostly the extra strings were used to eliminate awkward finge-rings resulting from having to stop the seventh course. These ‘diapasons’ were usually strung with octaves. Already by the early 1600s the ten-course lute had made its appearance, shown in con-temporary illustrations as constructed like its predecessors, with the strings running over a single nut to the pegbox, which has to be considerably longer to accommodate the additional pegs. The pegbox is also usually shown as being at a much shallower angle to the neck than the earlier Re-naissance lute, a fact borne out by the surviving original ten-course lute by Christofolo Cocho in the Carl Claudius collection, Musikhistorisk Museum, Copenhagen (no.96a). Often the paintings of ten-course lutes show a treble ‘rider’, a small extra pegholder on top of the normal pegbox side, designed to give a less acute angle on the nut for the fragile top string.

Another innovation reported by Dowland in Varietie was the lengthening of the neck of the in-strument:

for my selfe was borne but thirty yeeres after Hans Gerles booke was printed, and all the Lutes which I can remember used eight frets … some few yeeres after, by the French Nation, the neckes of the Lutes were lengthned, and thereby increased two frets more, so as all those Lutes, which are most received and disired, are of tenne frets.

❧ 10

Initially this may have been done to improve the tone of the low basses, but unless stronger treble strings became available at the same time, the pitch level of these longer lutes must have been lo-wer than the older eight-fret instruments. Interestingly, one such lengthened neck survived until quite recently, but when it was ‘restored’ this important source of evidence for the practice was removed. Sometimes extra wooden frets were glued on to the soundboard, an invention which Dowland attributed to the English player Mathias Mason.

It is interesting that Dowland should thus report the prevailing fashion in lutes as coming from France, for by his death in 1626 France was the dominant culture musically and was the centre for developments in different tunings, starting some time around 1620, which led to the 11-course lute. Lowe (B1986) has suggested that the 11th course may at first have been only an octave string. The later surviving 11-course lutes mostly appear to be conversions of ten-course instruments, all done in the same way, by making the second course single and adding a treble rider for the top string or ‘chanterelle’ on the top of the normal pegbox treble side. This effectively gave two extra pegs which were used for the new bass course, but, because the neck was now too narrow, these strings were taken over an extended nut which projected beyond the fingerboard and were faste-ned to the pegs on the outside of the pegbox. The famous portrait of Charles Mouton (fig.12) clearly shows that this was obviously not regarded as a stopgap measure. This final extra course on the same string-length has often been attributed to the invention of wire-wound or overspun strings, first advertised in England by Playford in 1664. However there is distressingly little hard evidence that these were in fact much used and they are not mentioned by either Mace or the Burwell tutor even though both wrote about the choice of strings. As Lowe (B1976) has shown, during the 17th century the French were already buying and converting early 16th-century Bo-logna lutes, seemingly because of a new aesthetic which valued the antique. There are so few sur-viving lutes with any claim to have been made in France that it is not possible to be sure what their makers were producing by way of new lutes at a time when lute playing was so important to French musical life. One must assume that the French cannot all have been playing on antique in-struments. Indeed the inventory of the French maker Jean Desmoulins (d 1648) points to a vigor-ous rate of production since it lists 249 lutes in various stages of construction as well as 14 theor-bos both large and small (see Lay, F1996). Only one lute by this maker has survived (Cité de la Musique, Marseilles).

Makers working in Italy, where the old tuning held sway, had already addressed the problem of extending the bass range in the 1590s by the expedient of having longer and therefore naturally deeper-sounding strings carried on a separate pegbox. The theorbo, chitarrone, liuto attiorbato and archlute all had extended straight-sided pegboxes carved from a solid piece of wood set into the neck housing at a very shallow angle and carrying at their ends a separate small pegbox for these extended bass strings. The form of all these instruments is very similar, differing mainly in the length of the extended pegbox, the number of courses carried and whether the bass courses were double or single. It was therefore only to be expected that this principle of longer, and therefore unfingered, bass strings should also be applied to non-continuo lutes. From about 1595 to 1630 various other types of extended pegboxes were tried for the bass strings. In one version, an extra piece of neck was added on the bass side which carried its own small bent-back pegbox. One of these (by Sixtus Rauwolf, 1599, though the extension may be later) has survived in the Carl Clau-dius collection, Musikhistorisk Museum, Copenhagen and there are several paintings showing this form, including works by Carlo Saraceni (c1579–1620) and Jan Miense Molenaer (c1610–1668).

More widely adopted was a double-headed lute with curved pegboxes (fig.13), one set backwards at an angle rather like the normal lute, the other extended in the same plane as the fingerboard. This carried four separate small nuts to take the bass courses in steps of increasing length. This form usually had 12 courses and was apparently invented by Jacques Gautier in about 1630 (see

11

Spencer, B1976, and Samson, B1977) but was not used much by the French who remained largely loyal to their single-headed lutes. As the author of the Burwell Lute Tutor (c1670) wrote: ‘All Eng-land hath accepted that Augmentation and ffraunce att first but soone after that alteration hath beene condemned by all the french Masters who are returned to theire old fashion keeping onely the small Eleaventh’. He, or she, objected to the length of the longer bass strings and felt that they rang on too much, thereby causing discords in moving bass lines. It was, however, widely used in England and the Netherlands until at least the end of the 17th century. The apparent thinking be-hind this form was a desire to avoid the sudden leaps in tone quality between the treble and bass strings which characterize the theorbo and archlute forms. An important tutor for this type of lute was Thomas Mace's Musick's Monument (1676), in which it was classed as a French lute; Talbot (c1695), however, called it the ‘English two headed lute’. For Talbot the ‘French lute’ had 11 courses, with all the strings on a single head. There has been some discussion as to the size of these in-struments (see Segerman, D1998). Talbot measured the string length of a 12-course instrument of this type as 59·7 cm; iconographical sources show all sizes. To date, six examples of this type have been found with fingered string lengths of between 50 and 75 cm.

This same principle of stepped nuts for bass strings of gradually increasing length lay behind a specifically English form of the theorbo, which is also described in Mace and was measured by Talbot (see Sayce, B1995; Van Edwards, B1995). Unusually for a theorbo this had double-strung courses in the bass which still further smoothed the transition across the range. None of these ha-ve survived. The French too seem to have developed their own version of the theorbo principle in the 17th century with a shorter extension than the Italian theorbo and possibly with single strin-ging (see Theorbo).

In Italy in the 17th century the drive towards extending the bass range of the lute was accommo-dated somewhat more consistently by incorporating the theorbo design into smaller lutes for solo use. Thus the liuto attiorbato came to be used in addition to normal lutes and theorbos, and later archlutes, for accompanying singers and continuo work. Matteo Sellas was part of another large German family of instrument makers still based in Italy, and produced very elaborate lutes and liuti attiorbati of ivory and ebony at his workshop ‘alla Corona’ (at the sign of the crown) in Venice. His brother Giorgio made equally decorative guitars and lutes ‘alla stella’. Working in Rome, beyond what might seem to be the natural bounds of migration from Germany, were David Tec-chler, Antonio Giauna and Cinthius Rotundus, from each of whom has survived an archlute, attes-ting this instrument's importance in Rome in the 17th and 18th centuries.

By the beginning of the 18th century, the centre of activity in lute music shifted from France to Germany and Bohemia. The makers extended the range of the instrument still further, and by 1719 composers were writing for 13 courses. There were two types of 13-course lutes developed and it is hard to say which was first, since both are possible conversions from pre-existing 11-course instruments and so labels are not conclusive. Paintings of both types are surprisingly rare. In one version a single pegbox was used like that of the 11-course lute, but, possibly starting as a conversion, a small subsidiary pegbox or ‘bass rider’ with four pegs to take the extra two courses was added to the bass side of the main pegbox (fig.14). This had the effect of giving between 5 and 7 cm extra length to these two courses. Commonly these lutes were quite large by previous standards with 70 to 75 cm being the usual string length. From what has been said so far about stringing this must imply a lower pitch for the main strings. It is clear from the details of the tabla-ture that Silvius Leopold Weiss composed throughout his life for this version of the 13-course lute which was developed by the new generation of German makers, working in Bohemia and Ger-many itself. Among the most important at this time were Sebastian Schelle and his pupil Leopold Widhalm working in Nuremberg (see Martius, B1996), Martin Hoffmann and his son Johann Christian working in Leipzig, Joachim Tielke and his pupil J.H. Goldt working in Hamburg (see G.

❧ 12

Hellwig, B1980) and Thomas Edlinger of Augsburg and his son Thomas, who moved to Prague and set up his workshop there. All these makers were violin makers as well, reflecting the growing importance of this instrument at a time when the lute was becoming less in demand.

These makers were also responsible for the other version of the 13-course lute with extended bass strings, the German Baroque lute (see Spencer, B1976). This had an ornately curved double peg-box carved out of a single piece of wood, usually ebonized sycamore. This type did not usually ha-ve a treble rider, but did occasionally feature a small separate slot carved in the treble side of the main pegbox to take the top string. Typically this kind of lute had eight courses on the fingerboard and five octaved courses going to the upper pegbox, these five being normally between 25 and 30 cm longer than the fingered strings. This design appears to be a modification of the pre-existing Angélique form. Some apparently early 13-course lutes, such as the 1680 Tielke instrument, dating from long before the earliest surviving 13-course music (c1719), seem to be converted ‘angéliques’. Others, such as the Fux conversion in 1696 of a Tieffenbrucker instrument and the 13-course lute of Martin Hoffmann dating from the 1690s, raise more awkward questions of dating. An even mo-re elaborate triple pegbox form of this type was also developed and a few examples have survived, notably by Johannes Jauck, a lute and violin maker working in Graz, and Martin Bruner (1724–1801) in Olomouc. These seem to have been functionally the same as the double pegbox form, and they may have represented a further attempt to obtain a smoother transition from the treble to bass courses.

Internally, the barring structure behind the bridge was altered by these makers. Beginning with an increase in the number of small treble-side fan bars, the characteristic J-bar on the bass side of the Renaissance soundboard was finally removed and various kinds of fan-barring were introduced right across this area of the soundboard. These seem to have had the effect of increasing the bass response. The main transverse bars were also made slightly smaller and more even in height, may-be with the same intention. The body outline of these lutes is remarkably similar to that of the early 16th-century lutes of Frei and Maler and this resemblance may well have been deliberate, for the old instruments continued to be highly prized. It was about this time (1727) that the first sys-tematic history of the lute was written, by E.G. Baron. Referring to the lutes of Luca Maler, he wro-te:

But it is a source of wonder that he already built them after the modern fashion, namely with the body long in proportion, flat and broad-ribbed, and which, provided that no fraud has been intro-duced, and they are original, are esteemed above all others. They are highly valued because they are rare and have a splendid tone.

This echoes the value placed on Maler lutes in the Fugger inventory of nearly 200 years earlier, which talks of ‘An old good lute by Laux Maler’ and ‘One old good lute by Sig[ismond] Maler’. Ba-ron's comment on the possibility of fraud is also interesting in this context, since there are several surviving lutes with supposedly 16th-century Tieffenbrucker labels which are clearly the work of Thomas Edlinger the younger working in Prague at about the time Baron was published. Thomas Mace too wrote of Maler ‘but the Chief Name we most esteem, is Laux Maller, ever written with Text Letters: Two of which Lutes I have seen (pittiful Old, Batter'd, Crack'd Things) valued at 100 l [£] a piece’.

In the 18th century a much simpler form of German ‘lute’, the mandora, emerged with the same string lengths and barring system as the Baroque lute but usually with only six or eight courses in a variety of tunings. Apparently mainly used by amateurs, it also found a useful niche in orchestras in place of the 13-course Baroque lute as well as for continuo and bass lines in sacred music, espe-cially large scale works.

13

Throughout the lute's history the gut strings have been matched by movable gut frets tied around the neck. The placing of these frets has always been a problem to both theoreticians and players, and many attempts have been made to find a system that will give the nearest approach to true intonation for as wide a range of intervals and in as many positions as possible. A number of wri-ters, including Gerle (C1532), Bermudo (C1555), the anonymous author of Discours non plus mélan-cholique (1557), Vincenzo Galilei (Fronimo, 1568) and John Dowland, put forward various systems, many of which were based on Pythagorean intervals. Late 16th-century theorists in Italy, as well as 17th-century writers such as Praetorius and Mersenne, habitually assumed that the intonation of the lute (and other fretted instruments) represented equal temperament, whereas, in contrast, keyboard instruments were tuned to some form of mean-tone temperament (see Temperaments).

5. Tunings.

The earliest tuning instructions for the Western lute date from the late 15th century and are mo-stly for five-course lute. The best known is that of Johannes Tinctoris, whose De inventione et usu musicae (c1481–3) gives a tuning of 4ths around a central 3rd. However, as both five- and six-cour-se lutes are mentioned, the position of the ‘central 3rd’ is unfortunately ambiguous. Both the Königstein Liederbuch (c1470–73) and an English manuscript dating from between 1493 and 1509 (GB-Ctc 0.2.13) give intervals of 4–3–4–4 from bass to treble. Ramis de Pareia (Musica practica, Bologna, 1482) stated that the most common tuning was G–c–e–a–d', but mentioned another dro-ne tuning with the lowest three strings tuned to A–d–a; the trebles were set in various (unspeci-fied) ways. Antonio de Nebrija (Vocabulario Español-Latino, Salamanca, c1495) apparently gave an unlikely diminished 5th between the two lowest courses, then 3–4–5, but the correct translation of his description is disputed. The late 15th-century Pesaro manuscript (I-PESo 1144) includes tabla-ture for a seven-course lute with the tuning 4–4–4–3–4–4, as does a manuscript now in Bologna (I-Bu 596.HH.24, which probably dates from the same period. The latter gives the tuning E–A–d–g–b–e'–a'.

By around 1500 six courses had become standard; the earliest printed sources, including Spinacino (1507), Dalza (1508) and Bossinensis (1509 and 1511) require a six-course lute, usually tuned 4–4–3–4–4. Virdung (Musica getuscht; Basle, 1511) mentioned lutes of five, six and seven courses, the six-course lute being the most common, and gave a tuning 4–4–3–4–4, with the sixth course tuned to a nominal A. The fourth, fifth and sixth courses were tuned in octaves, the second and third courses in unisons, with a single first course. Agricola advocated this pattern in the first edition of his Musica instrumentalis deudsch (Wittenberg, 1529) but gave a tuning a tone lower, in nominal G. Occasionally the sixth course was tuned down a tone, a variation called ‘Abzug’ by Virdung and ‘bordon descordato’ by Spinacino. In the 1545 edition of Musica instrumentalis deudsch Agricola sta-ted that a seven-course instrument, with the seventh course tuned a tone below the sixth course, was preferable to this scordatura, which was difficult to manage.

This basic six-course tuning, with octaved lower courses, and an interval of two octaves between the outer courses, remained the norm for most of the 16th century. Tablature sources with parallel staff notation (from both the 16th and early 17th centuries) show that the most common nominal tunings were either in A (A–d–g–b–e'–a') or G (G–c–f–a–d'–g'), though lutes in other nominal pit-ches are encountered. There is a considerable body of literature discussing whether or not these variable pitches were intended to be interpreted literally. Practical considerations of instrument availability, together with notational considerations such as the avoidance of leger lines in the staff notated part, suggest that these apparent lute pitches were only nominal. Cue notes are often pro-vided in the tablature, to clarify the relationship of lute pitch to staff notation. The absolute pitch of the lute was variable; contemporary tutors typically instruct the player to tune the top course as high as possible, and set the other strings to that.

❧ 14

Surviving 16th-century tablatures for multiple lutes call for a total ‘consort’ of nominal d'', a', g', e' and d', to accommodate all of the variations encountered in the duet and trio repertories, though Praetorius (Syntagma musicum, ii, 1618, 2/1619/R) mentioned other sizes too. The intervals between courses remained the same, irrespective of the size of the lute. A few lutenists explored other tu-nings, albeit briefly; these included Hans Neusidler (1544) whose infamous Judentanz requires a drone tuning; Barberiis (1549) printed pieces using the tunings 4–5–3–4–4, 5–4–2–4–4, and 4–4–3–5–4; Wolff Heckel (1562) also used a drone tuning for a Judentanz and other pieces.

By the 1580s a seventh course, tuned either a tone or a 4th below the sixth course, was in regular use, and eight-course lutes incorporating both of these options became common in the 1590s. By the early 1600s ten-course lutes were in use, with diatonically tuned basses descending stepwise from the sixth course. Around the same period the octave tuning of at least the fourth and fifth courses was dropped in favour of unisons, though the octaves were certainly retained on the lo-west courses and perhaps on the sixth course too. Otherwise the tuning of the six upper courses remained essentially unchanged, and became known as vieil ton. There was a brief vogue for cordes avallées tunings in France, used by Francisque (1600) and Besard (C1603), which involved lowe-ring the fourth, fifth and sixth courses to give drone-like 4ths and 5ths. These tunings were used almost exclusively for rustic dance pieces.

In the early years of the 17th century two distinct traditions began to emerge. The Italians mostly retained the old tuning, adding extra bass courses (see Archlute) though P.P. Melli and Bernardo Gianoncelli experimented with variant tunings of the upper courses. Around 1620 French compo-sers began to experiment with several accords nouveaux, first on ten-course lutes, and later on 11- and 12-course instruments. (With these new tunings, the interval between the first and sixth cour-ses was always narrower than the two octaves of vieil ton; they should not be confused with the cordes avallées tunings, where this interval was always wider than two octaves.) This experimenta-tion continued until at least the 1670s, and music for over 20 different tunings survives, many of which were given different names by different scribes or composers (see Schulze-Kurz, E1990). However, only a handful were common and these included what is today considered to be the normal ‘Baroque’ D minor tuning. This did not become standard until the second half of the 17th century; the tuning commonly known as ‘Flat French’ was equally popular until about the 1660s. The advantages of the new tunings were increased resonance and ease of left-hand fingering, though only within a very limited range of keys. The derivation of these tunings from vieil ton, and the subsequent emergence of the D minor tuning, has been somewhat obfuscated by recent edito-rial methods which transcribe these tunings on the basis of an instrument whose sixth course is tuned to G. The transition is much clearer (and transcriptions emerge in less obscure keys) if the sixth course in vieil ton is considered to be A. Some of the more common tunings are shown in Ta-ble 1. In all of the above tunings (including vieil ton on lutes with more than eight courses) the bas-ses were tuned diatonically downwards from the sixth course. The lute had become essentially dia-tonic in its bass register, and the tuning of the lowest courses would be adjusted for the key of the piece. (This was a major factor in the grouping of pieces by key, which led to the baroque suite.)

15

The first print to use the new tunings was Pierre Ballard’s Tablature de luth de différents autheurs sur l’accord ordinaire et extraordinaire (Paris, 1623; now lost). Slightly later collections survive, containing fine music by Mesangeau, Chancy, Belleville, Robert Ballard (ii), Pierre Gautier (i) and others, in various accords nouveaux. The tunings were widely used in England after the 1630s; publications by Richard Mathew (1652) and Thomas Mace (C1676) use ‘Flat French’ tuning; Mace provided a translation chart to convert tablatures between ‘Flat French’ and ‘D minor’ tunings. By the 1670s the 11-course single-pegbox lute in D minor tuning had emerged as the preferred norm throug-hout much of Europe, and remained so until the early years of the 18th century, when two further courses were added, extending the lute’s range down to A'. The last printed sources to make signi-ficant use of variant tunings are Esaias Reusner (ii) (1676) and Jakob Kremberg (1689).

6. Technique.

Several writers of instruction books for the lute have remarked that many masters of the art were, as Mace put it, ‘extreme Shie in revealing the Occult and Hidden Secrets of the Lute’. Bermudo had la-mented the same characteristic in teachers: ‘What a pity it is (and those who have Christian un-derstanding must weep for it) that the great secrets of music die in a moment with the person of the musician, for lack of having communicated them to others’. The training of professional play-ers was almost certainly carried on through some system of apprenticeship, and this may well be one of the reasons why comparatively few books give really informative instructions on all aspects of playing technique. Nevertheless, details have been left by the more conscientious authors that are sufficiently clear to establish the main characteristics of lute technique in each period.

Although little was written about left-hand techniques, certain basic rules were mentioned from the Capirola Lutebook (c1517, US-Cn; ed. O. Gombosi, 1955; see also Marincola, F1983) onwards. The lute must be held in such a way that no weight is taken by the left hand. The thumb should be placed lightly on the underside of the neck, opposite the first and second fingers. The tips of the fingers should always stay as close as possible to the strings so that each one is ready to take its position without undue movement. Fingers must be kept in position on the strings until they are required to stop another string, or until the harmony changes. Judenkünig went so far as to say they must never be lifted until needed elsewhere.

In Capirola’s lutebook the player was advised to keep the fingers in readiness and not to avoid using the little finger; the first finger could be laid across several strings to form a barré chord. So-metimes a finger was placed on one string only of a course in order to create an extra voice (a de-

❧ 16

vice also described by Valentin Bakfark and the vihuelist Miguel de Fuenllana); the right hand would then strike through the whole course as usual.

It was, however, the German masters who first codified a system of fingering. Judenkünig gave a series of diagrams of left-hand positions. In the first of these the hand spans the first three frets and the fourth fret on the sixth course; the first finger is marked with the six characters of the first fret in German tablature; the second finger is marked with the next series; the third finger takes the lower three courses on the third fret; and the little finger takes the upper three courses as well as the fourth fret on the sixth course. Each diagram shows the fingers rigidly aligned on the ap-propriate fret. A small cross placed above a letter indicates that the finger must be held down and the following note played with the next finger, whatever fret it may be on. Judenkünig did not des-cribe the fingering of chords, or cross-fingering where the counterpoint makes it necessary to de-part from the prescribed alignment. Neusidler (Ein newgeordnet künstlich Lautenbuch, 1536) indica-ted by means of dots the fingering of a number of simple compositions. In general he followed the rules laid down by Judenkünig, but he also showed how chords constantly demand the use of fin-gers on frets other than those allotted to them in a strict diagrammatic scheme.

In England and France little attention was given to left-hand technique until the publication of Adrian Le Roy’s tutor Instruction … de luth (?1557, lost, repr. 1567, also lost, Eng. trans., 1568, see §8(v)), which described the barré chord as ‘couching’ the first finger ‘along overthwart the stoppe’. Robinson (C1603) described how to finger certain chord passages and also how to finger ascen-ding and descending melodic lines. He also added fingering marks to the first five compositions in his books. Besard (C1603) described in considerable detail the use of the barré, and half barré, and also gave advice on how to choose the correct finger for holding notes, particularly in the bass. La-ter in the 17th century more complete markings were given by Nicolas Vallet (Secretum musarum, 1615) and, for a 12-course French lute, Mace.

Until about the second half of the 15th century most representations of lute players (where the details are visible) show the strings being struck with a quill or plectrum. The hand approaches the strings from below the bridge and lies nearly parallel with them. The plectrum or quill is held ei-ther between the thumb and first finger, or the first and second, or even the second and third. Gradually the fingers replaced the plectrum. In pictures dating from about 1480 it is common to see players with the hand in a slightly more transverse position (see fig.9). For any composition involving chords the advantage of this change is obvious. Tinctoris observed that players were be-coming so skilful that they could play four voices together on the lute perfectly.

The earliest printed books gave little information about right-hand techniques. A dot placed under a note signified that it was to be played upwards, and the absence of a dot downwards; all passages of single notes were played accordingly. Later sources specified that the downward stroke was al-ways taken by the thumb on the accented beat, while the unaccented beat was taken upwards, usu-ally with the first finger. This type of fingering was to remain standard practice until about 1600. It was still mentioned by Alessandro Piccinini (Intavolatura di liuto, et di chitarrone, 1623) and by Mer-senne (1636–7), and it survived for runs of single notes across the lute from bottom to top and for certain other passages until 1660–70.

According to the instructions in the Capirola manuscript (the first to give any real insight into the playing position of the right hand), the thumb was held under the second finger, that is, inside the hand. Adrian Le Roy was the first to mention that the little finger is placed on the belly of the lute, although many representations of players before 1568 show the hand with the little finger in this position. Le Roy wrote: ‘the little finger serveth but to keep the hande from [firm] upon the bealie of the Lute’. From then onwards it was frequently mentioned. Robinson, for example, said: ‘leane

17

upon the bellie of the Lute with your little finger onelie, & that neither to far from the Treble strings, neither to neere’. Mace wrote: ‘The 2d. thing to be gain’d is, setting down your Little Finger upon the Belly, as aforesaid, close under the Bridge, about the first, 2d, 3d, or 4th. Strings; for therea-bout, is its constant station. It steadies the Hand, and gives a Certainty to the Grasp’. From this time on-wards, portraits of performing lute players always show the little finger placed either on the soundboard, in front of or behind the bridge, or on the bridge itself (as in fig.11).

During the Renaissance, chords were usually played with the thumb on the bass, playing down-wards, and the first and second, or the first, second and third fingers, playing upwards. For chords of more than four notes the following procedure was given by Le Roy and Besard: for five-note chords the thumb plays the bass downwards, the third and fourth courses are raked upwards by the first finger, and the first and second courses are played respectively by the third and second fingers; six-note chords are played in a similar way with the thumb playing downwards across both the sixth and fifth courses. The upper note of two-part chords was generally taken by the se-cond finger, although Robinson preferred the third.

A single dot under a chord of two or three notes generally means that it is played upwards with the usual fingers, but without the thumb. Gerle, however, used a dot under a chord to show that all the notes were to be played upwards with the first finger, while Judenkünig said that in dance mu-sic full chords may be stroked or strummed with the thumb throughout. Neusidler also mentio-ned the ‘thumb-stroke’. Robinson, however, advocated the third finger for notes farthest from the thumb, the second for the next note, and the first for those nearest. Besard was the first writer to describe a new position for the thumb; his directions are translated as follows in Dowland’s book of 1610:

stretch out your Thombe with all the force you can, especially if thy Thombe be short, so that the other fingers may be carryed in the manner of a fist, and let the Thombe be held higher than them, this in the beginning will be hard. Yet they which have a short Thombe may imitate those which strike the strings with the Thombe under the other fingers, which though it be nothing so elegant, yet to them it will be more easie.

Dowland himself is said to have changed to the ‘thumb-out’ position in mid-career (Beier, B1979), presumably to take advantage of the consequent greater stretch, perhaps in connection with the addition of extra courses. The increase in the number of courses was probably also responsible for a general shift in the position and movement of the hand. Besard suggested:

the first two fingers may be used in Diminutions very well insteed of the Thombe and the fore-fin-ger, if they be placed with some Bases, so that the middle finger be in place of the Thombe, which Thombe whilst it is occupied in striking at least the Bases, both the hands will be graced and that unmanly motion of the Arme (which many cannot well avoide) shall be shunned. But if with the said Diminutions there be not set Bases which are to be stopped, I will not counsell you to use the two first fingers, but rather the Thombe and the fore-finger: neither will I wish you to use the two fore-fingers if you be to proceede (that is to runne) into the fourth, fift or sixt string with Diminu-tions set also with some parts.

Markings comprising a pair of dots or small strokes under the note to indicate the use of the se-cond finger occur in many manuscripts from the early 17th century (e.g. Vallet used the latter marking). A single vertical line or stroke under a note was an indication to use the thumb, to which greater attention was paid with the increasing number of bass strings. Piccinini described an apoyando stroke:

❧ 18

The thumb, on which I do not approve of a very long nail, must be employed in this manner, that every time you sound a string you must direct it [the thumb] towards the soundboard, so that it is crushed onto the string below, and it must be kept there until it has to be used again.

This type of stroke was mentioned by other writers and appears to have become standard practice during the Baroque period. In fact, such a technique is almost essential when the thumb has to make rapid jumps among a number of diapasons. If the thumb is held free, there is no point of reference from which each movement can be judged accurately.

In the second decade of the 17th century many new technical devices began to appear. Bataille’s Airs de différents autheurs (iv, 1613) used a dot for a quasi-rasgueado device in repeated chords (ex.1) that is described by Mersenne and became extremely common, especially in pieces in sarabande rhythm: the dot at the top of the chord stands for an upward stroke with the first finger, while the dot at the bottom stands for a downward stroke with the back of the same finger (ex.1a). For this device, sometimes called tirer et rabattre, later composers often distinguished the second, down-ward-struck chord by dots next to the notes (ex.1b).

Italy was apparently the first country in which the slur was developed as part of normal technique instead of being confined to the execution of graces. Pietro Paoli Melli (Intavolatura di liuto attiorba-to libro secondo, 1614) described the action of the left hand, and placed a ligature under pairs of notes to be slurred, a marking which was always used to indicate the slur. There seems to be no evidence that the slur was used in France, England or Germany at this early date, but Mersenne described it in 1636.

Piccinini introduced some individualistic traits into his playing: although the use of the nails was deprecated by nearly all other writers, Piccinini said that they should be ‘a little long, in front of the flesh, but not much, and oval in shape’. He played the rapid ‘groppo that is made at the cadence’ with the first finger alone, striking upwards and downwards with the tip of the nail. (This is similar to the vihuela’s ‘dedillo’, which was usually played with short nails.) He also advocated a change of tone colour by moving the right hand nearer or farther from the bridge. In France an increasing number of different right-hand strokes were used. Mersenne gave the traditional fingerings both for chords and single-note passages, and some new strokes which had evidently become popular by then. He described several ways of playing chords, and a system of marking by which each me-thod could be distinguished. Some chords were played downwards with the thumb: others with all

19

the notes played by the thumb except the top one which was played by the first finger; others with the thumb playing the single bass note while the first finger raked the rest of the notes upwards. Unfortunately these detailed notations seem not to have been adopted in other surviving printed and manuscript sources. Nevertheless many of these devices became part of the French Baroque style. In volumes such as Denis Gaultier’s Pièces de luth (1666), Denis and Ennemond Gaultier’s Li-vre de tablature des pièces de luth (c1672) and Jacques Gallot’s Pièces de luth (1681), markings are given for arpeggiating or ‘breaking’ chords. Some writers described the ‘slipping’ of the first finger across two notes on adjacent strings to realize a short mordent, usually at a cadence; this characteristic device, which was used well into the 18th century, was shown by three different markings (ex.2).

Many of these techniques were carefully described in English lute books such as the Mary Burwell Lute Tutor (c1660–72, GB-Lam) and in Mace’s Musick’s Monument. The techniques were passed on to the German school; a similar variety of strokes is described by Baron who also mentioned a chan-ge of right-hand position for tone colour. As in other countries, German sources vary greatly in the extent to which technique marks and left-hand fingerings were added to the tablature, often reflecting the level of attainment of the person for whom they were written.

The development of playing technique was thus closely related to the continual process of exten-ding the resources of the instrument. Moreover, each technique produces particular qualities sui-ted to its own time, and the modern lutenist must know this in order to do justice to the music. Most ‘technical’ indications, such as vibrato or staccato (see §7 below), or the spreading of chords (indicated by oblique lines separating the notes of a chord; see §8(iii)), come under the general heading of ‘graces’ (Fr. agréments; Ger. Manieren), which term adumbrates most aspects of perform-ance as well as ornamentation in treatises, including playing loudly and softly or with rhetorical intent.

7. Ornamentation.

The use of what in modern terms would be called trills, mordents, appoggiaturas and vibrato has evidently always been an integral part of the performance of lute music. The fact that in the Re-naissance period ornament signs are frequently not included in printed books or manuscripts and are written about comparatively rarely in early tutors may be due to several causes; probably the most important was that there was a living tradition that was considered unnecessary to mention or notate. Another reason may have been that cited by Mersenne, namely that printers lacked the requisite signs in their equipment. These ornaments never acquired a standardized nomenclature or system of signs, although some degree of conformity developed towards the end of the Baroque period.

In the Capirola Lutebook (c1517, US-Cn), the earliest known source of information, two signs are used: one shows figures notated with red dots; the other consists of two red dots placed over the figure. Of the first sign it is said only that the finger on the lower fret is held firm and another fin-ger is used to ‘tremolize’ on or from the fret above. The second sign is said to indicate that the note is ‘tremolized’ with a single finger; it probably represents a mordent.

❧ 20

More precise information was given by Pietro Paolo Borrono in the second printing (Milan, 1548) of the Intavolatura di lauto which gives appoggiaturas with both notes carefully indicated by sign. Only the appoggiatura from above is mentioned in the directions, which also say that it is to be played on the beat.

Rudolf Wyssenbach printed a transcription in German tablature (Zürich, 1550) of part of the con-tents of the Francesco-Borrono book of 1546; half circles are said to indicate mordanten, but no further explanation is given. The word mordanten appears to have been used in German as a ge-neral term for ornaments including the appoggiatura rather than as a specific term for any one type of ornament. It occurs in Martin Agricola’s Musica instrumentalis deudsch (1529) and was still used by Matthäus Waissel in his Lautenbuch darinn von der Tabulatur und Application der Lauten (1592). Waissel’s remark that the fingers are put ‘a little later on the letters and moved up and down two or three times’ indicates (in agreement with Borrono) that the ornament came on or after the beat and not before.

No information appears to have survived concerning ornamentation of French lute music before Besard, who made the following remark:

You should have some rules for the sweet relishes and shakes if they could be expressed here, as they are on the LUTE: but seeing they cannot by speech or writing be expressed, thou wert best to imitate some cunning player.

Vallet used two signs: a comma, signifying a fall from above the main note (upper appoggiatura), and a single cross, signifying the same thing repeated several times, i.e. a trill. In his Regia pietas (1620) Vallet described what is in effect a vibrato, indicated by a double cross.

Mersenne gave the most complete exposition of the art of ornamentation of the period. Excluding minor variants (such as whether a tone or semitone is involved), seven ornaments may be tallied: the tremblement (trill); the accent plaintif (appoggiatura from below, equal in duration to half the va-lue of the main note); the martelement or soupir (mordent); the verre cassé (vibrato, which Mersenne said was not much used in his time, although it was very popular in the past; in his opinion, ho-wever, it would be as bad a fault to omit it altogether as to use it to excess); the battement (long trill, more suitable to the violin, he said, than to the lute); a combination (for which no name is given) of appoggiatura from below with trill from above; and a mordent ending with verre cassé. He gave a sign to indicate each of the seven types, but remarked that in French music the small comma was generally used to ‘express all sorts’.

In Italy, Kapsperger (Libro primo d’intavolatura di chitarrone, 1604) placed two dots above many notes to indicate the trillo, and also added a sign (an oblique stroke with a dot on either side) below cer-tain chords to show that they were to be arpeggiated. Melli marked the notes on which a ‘tremolo’ should be performed, but gave no explanation of the meaning of the word, though he described a method of performing an appoggiatura from below by sliding the auxiliary to the main note with a single finger. This is indicated by a ligature above the two notes and appears to be unique in this period. Piccinini, however, gave detailed descriptions of the trill, the mordent and the vibrato, which he called the first, second and third tremolo, but he did not include signs for them in the tablature.

Early English manuscript sources show no ornament signs, but all the books copied by Matthew Holmes (c1580–1610, GB-Cu) contain them, although their placing is often curious. At least 17 other manuscripts also have signs, and William Barley’s A Newe Booke of Tabliture (1596) includes the double cross, but with no explanation of its meaning. The only English book of this period containing information on the subject is Robinson’s The Schoole of Musicke (1603). He gave no signs

21

nor any indication of where the graces should be placed, but he described three that could be used: the relish (perhaps an appoggiatura from above, or a trill); the fall (an appoggiatura from below); and a fall with a relish (possibly the same as Mersenne's combination of lower appoggiatu-ra and upper trill). Robinson said of the relish:

The longer the time of a single stroke … the more need it hath of a relish, for a relish will help, both to grace it, and also it helps to continue the sound of the note his full time: but in a quicke time a little touch or jerke will serve, and that only with the most strongest finger.

The variety of graces in use around 1625 is indicated in Table 2, taken from the Margaret Board Lutebook (GB-Lam, f.32). Generally, however, the lack of standardization in signs and the absence of any indication of their meaning as used by different scribes poses a formidable problem in in-terpretation, and it is possible here only to offer some suggestions based on a study of their con-text in all the available material.

Table 3 shows the signs most generally found in English manuscript sources. Sign (a) is often the only sign in a manuscript, and, like the French comma, can be taken ‘to express all sorts’. If it ap-pears in company with other signs it seems to signify an ornament from above the main note, perhaps an appoggiatura or trill. Sign (b) indicates an appoggiatura from below, a mordent, or a slide (the ornament that comes up to the main note from a minor or major 3rd below). Sign (c) appears in the Sampson Lutebook (GB-Lam); its possible interpretation as a slide on a major 3rd is discussed below. Sign (d) indicates an appoggiatura from below, in the Sampson Lutebook; this is suggested by the fact that the sign appears before a note which is followed by (a), presumably indi-cating Robinson’s ‘fall with a relish’. Sign (e) is used similarly (US-Ws 1610.1). Signs (f) and (g) (the latter from GB-Lbl Add.38539) indicate a mordent, appoggiatura from below or a slide. Sign (h) occurs in a limited number of pieces in GB-Lbl Add.38539, always on a note immediately preceded by the note above, and often in fairly fast runs. This may be the ‘little touch or jerke’ mentioned by Robinson, or possibly an inverted mordent. Although the latter was clearly described in Spain from the time of Tomás de Santa María (in Arte de tañer fantasía assi para tecla como para vihuela, 1565) to Pablo Nassare (Escuela musica, 1724), in Italy by Girolamo Diruta (Il transilvano, 1593) and in Germany by Praetorius (Syntagma musicum, iii, 2/1619), there is no mention of it in any English source. It would, however, fit into the passages in which the sign is used. Signs (i), (j) and (k) indi-cate a fall with a relish. In compositions in John Dowland’s hand, (c), which appears on both open and stopped notes, presumably indicates an upper appoggiatura or trill; (f), which appears on stopped notes only, may indicate an appoggiatura from below; and (b), which appears on open notes only, may indicate a trill. However, these interpretations are open to question owing to a marked lack of consistency in the application of gracing, and in its notation. Many sources have few, if any, grace marks, and in the final analysis musical intuition has to be the arbiter. (The inter-pretation of ornament signs in English lute music is further addressed, with somewhat differing results, in studies by Buetens and Shepherd.)

❧ 22

Fashion in ornamentation may have varied from country to country; English players of the first two decades of the 17th century perhaps graced their music to a greater extent than those in any other part of Europe. A Fantasie by Dowland (GB-Lbl Add. 38539, f.14v; ex.3), with nine ornaments in the space of five bars, shows an extreme of English practice.

23

No exact line of demarcation can be drawn between Renaissance and Baroque ornamentation. Most graces used in the earlier period continued in favour, but a few more elaborate combinations appeared. From Mersenne’s time onwards, some French manuscripts have a large variety of signs: the comma, ‘’ and ‘’ for martelements, something like an ordinary mordent sign placed under a note, and, to indicate the appoggiatura from below, a bow-like sign placed beneath the tablature letter, very like Mace’s sign for a slur. Double shakes or appoggiaturas began to appear. The étouffement (Mace’s ‘tut’) is also mentioned in some sources, and the sign ‘’ is used. Mace’s Musick’s Monument, in many ways the most thorough study of the French lute, includes (pp.101ff) a list of ornaments, which are summarized in Table 4. He also wrote of loud and soft play and the use of the pause (indicated by a small fermata sign) as additional graces to be observed.

❧ 24

25

In Denis Gaultier’s Pièces de luth (1666) less elaboration is found. The two ornaments given are in-dicated by the comma and the slur and are equivalent to Mace’s back-fall and fore-fall. In Livre de tablature des pièces de luth by Denis and Ennemond Gaultier (c1672) the explanation of the comma shows that the number of falls should be increased according to the length of the note. According to Mary Burwell’s teacher, however, Denis Gaultier ‘would have no shake at all’. Undoubtedly per-sonal taste played a part in ornamentation as in all other aspects of performance. Three ornament signs are listed by Gallot: tremblement, or trill, indicated by a small comma after the tablature letter; martelement, or mordent, indicated by ‘’; choutte, or tombé, an appoggiatura from below, indicated by an inverted ‘’ before the letter. The rhythmical breaking of chords, a universal feature of the French lute style (see §8(iii) below, esp. ex.3), was explicitly indicated by oblique lines between chord members. The existence of another explicit notation, a vertical line connecting non-adjacent tabla-ture letters, to indicate that the notes are to be struck together, suggests that a certain degree of spreading was in fact normal.

German Baroque lutenists at first consciously maintained the tradition of the Parisian luthistes, using many of the French ornament signs, which they classed under the general heading of Manie-ren (equivalent to agréments or ‘graces’) along with other technical or performance indications. The Breslau lutenist, Esaias Reusner (ii), who was coached by an unknown French lutenist in Paris in the 1650s, used a cross, a comma and a ‘fermata’ sign (Delitiae testudinis, 1667 and Neue Lauten-Früch-te, 1676) but did not explain their meaning. The context suggests that the comma indicates a trill and the cross a mordent, while the fermata probably represents a pause, as it does for his English contemporary, Mace. Reusner indicated the appoggiatura from below by a bow under the letter. Le Sage de Richée (Cabinet der Lauten) gave, together with other information about performing prac-tice, three ornaments: the trill indicated by a comma; the appoggiatura from above, which he cal-led Abzug; and the appoggiatura from below (Fall). Both appoggiaturas are written out with a bow under the pairs of letters (the explanations are somewhat ambiguous). Radolt (Vienna, 1701) pro-vided an exhaustive list of Manieren citing François Dufaut’s example. Hinterleithner (Vienna, 1699) explained that the Abzug (which he called Abriss) divides the ornamented note’s duration equally. Trills are only played on dotted notes; on shorter notes they are abbreviated to an Abriss. Radolt stressed that the trill always begins on the upper note. Baron (Nuremberg, 1727) used the same signs as Radolt for the appoggiatura from above (Abziehen) and for the trill (performed from the upper note, and gradually increasing in speed), but in addition described two forms of vibrato (Bebung): one (on the higher strings) performed with the thumb released from the back of the neck, the other with the thumb held firm. He indicated them with a double and slanted cross res-pectively. Baron added that the ornaments he mentioned were not the only ones that could be used, as many more could be added with the use of skill and taste: ‘Every player must judge for himself what sort of affect he wishes to express with this or that ornament’. He also stressed the difference between solo performance, where a player could use more ornamentation and rubato, and ensemble playing, where each player’s performing method had to be known in advance and accommodated for the sake of good ensemble. For faster music, Baron remarked that ‘the best Ma-nier is nothing more than neatness and clarity, and if someone wanted to make many other addi-tions it would be as ridiculous as chasing rabbits with snails and crabs’.

Silvius Leopold Weiss’s notational practice was remarkably consistent in his numerous autograph manuscripts. As was common in the period, he tended to use more ornamentation in slow move-ments, and the ornamental notes are seamlessly integrated into the music, occasionally (especially the Einfall) being written out explicitly in the tablature, often using separate strings for the orna-mental and main notes, rather than being indicated by signs. This ‘two-string appoggiatura’ (ex.4) had been in use since the days of the Parisian luthistes, but unlike them Weiss frequently used it in an unambiguously melodic context. He used the normal comma sign for an Abzug or Triller, some-times extended by repetition, and the bow under a letter for an appoggiatura from below; someti-

❧ 26

mes, especially at a cadence, this sign extends backwards towards the previous note, even across a barline, looking somewhat like a legato slur (ex.5). The mordent is marked by a single cross and Bebung (vibrato, rarely used by Weiss) by a short wavy line above and to the right of the letter.

There is no surviving treatise or table of ornaments by Weiss although he was much in demand as a teacher. Whereas he was following earlier practice in not using signs to distinguish the Abzug and Triller, nor the short and long forms of mordent and trill, later players, whose extensive repertory of signs was possibly influenced by the practice of their keyboard-playing contemporaries, became more explicit in their notation. A manuscript from Bayreuth (c1750, D-Ngm M274) contains two tables of ‘Zeichen der Lauten Manieren’ (‘signs for lute graces’) attributable to Weiss’s one-time pupil, Adam Falckenhagen. The signs therein correspond with Falckenhagen’s printed works and with the tablature version of J.S. Bach’s Lute Suite in G minor bwv995, which was probably intabu-lated by Falckenhagen. Signs which seem to be introduced in these tables for the first time include one for ‘gebrochener Bass’ (‘broken bass’; the fundamental and octave strings of a bass course being rhythmically separated), a sign for staccato or damped (‘gestossen’) chords, and a sign for the full turn (with a written-out realization equivalent to C.P.E. Bach’s geschnellte Doppelschlag). A closely related table was printed by J.C. Beyer with his lute arrangements of Herrn Prof. Gellerts Oden und Lieder (1760). The principal ornament signs used or explained by Le Sage de Richée, Hinter-leithner, Radolt, Baron, Weiss, Falckenhagen and Beyer are summarized in Table 5.

27

From the early years of the 16th century until the end of the 18th, the use of graces was an integral part of performing practice on the lute as it was on the harpsichord. Because of its lack of sustai-ning power (compared with bowed instruments) these devices were essential, especially in slower music. Finally the necessity promoted the fashion and composers expected graces to be added, whether or not they were actually indicated, since they were an essential feature of lute style.

During the 17th and 18th centuries the art of ornamentation received careful attention in nume-rous treatises on singing and on playing various instruments, and also in composers’ prefaces to their works: this valuable information is often applicable to the lute as well as to the particular subject under consideration (see Ornaments).

8. Repertory.

From the 1270s, when Jehan de Meung in Le roman de la rose mentioned ‘quitarres e leüz’, the pre-sence of the lute in western Europe is evident in literary sources, court records and inventories. The Duke of Orléans is said to have had in his service in 1396 ‘un joueur de vièle et de luc’ called Henri de Ganière. The names of a few players from other parts of Europe have also survived, such as a certain Obrecht in Basle in 1363, and the brothers Drayer, minstrels at Mechelen from 1371 to 1374. During the 14th century, representations of the lute in drawings, paintings and sculpture be-came common, often in combination with other instruments, sometimes accompanying one or more voices.

❧ 28

Extant 15th-century records mention sums of money paid to lute players in service at the French court. In 1491 for example, Antoine Her, a lute player of the chamber royal, received a monthly stipend of 10 livres and 10 sols. The great esteem in which virtuosos were held is evident in the case of Pietrobono, who served the Este family at the court of Ferrara from about 1440 until his death in 1497. Other courts competed for his services; he was widely travelled, became a rich man and was celebrated by poets and writers of the time (including Tinctoris). Surviving documents imply that he accompanied himself in singing and that he was associated with another player who was listed as a ‘tenorista’ – possibly another lute player or a viol player who, in either case, would have supplied a ‘tenor’ against which Pietrobono would have improvised. He seems to exemplify an age in which Italian lute players were passing from a style that had been mainly improvisatory to one in which, as Tinctoris suggested, a full training in the technique of contrapuntal writing or playing was essential.

This development was associated with the change from playing the lute with a plectrum to using the right-hand fingers. Whereas previously the lute had been a melodic instrument, it could now be used for polyphony. This in turn soon led to the invention of special forms of notation to over-come the particular problems involved in transmitting the music to the written or printed page. Examples of German, French and Italian tablatures from the end of the 15th century have come to light, but these fragments reveal little about the early repertory. In addition, there are in the Sego-via Cathedral manuscript some instrumental duos with elaborate divisions by Tinctoris, Agricola and others that well suit the lute and clearly reflect the improvisational demands on players of the time; one of these in particular, a setting of Hayne van Ghizeghem’s De tous biens plaine, ascribed to Roellrin, also appears in a German manuscript (PL-Wu Mf.20161) and is unlikely to have been playable on any other contemporary instrument. Some of the compositions in the earliest printed sources show a similar style.

A common thread that runs throughout the history of lute playing is the improvisatory skill of the great performers. For this reason, most of the repertory was probably never written down. Lute playing was passed on by individual tuition, and many lute manuscripts were compiled by teachers for their pupils, and supplemented (sometimes somewhat inexpertly) from memory by the pupils. These circumstances, combined with the irrecoverable loss of a great many sources, account for the fact that much lute music in manuscript carries no composer’s name, and, as much in the Ba-roque period as in the Renaissance, there is frequently divergence between versions of the same piece in different sources, especially in matters concerning performance. For a fuller discussion of lute sources, with illustrations, see Sources of lute music.

(i) Italy.

The earliest surviving significant Italian lute source is a heart-shaped manuscript (I-PESo 1144) partially copied in the last decades of the 15th century and possibly of Venetian origin. Unusually, it is notated in a rudimentary form of French lute tablature (the rhythm-signs and sporadic bar-ring being apparently based on the position of the tactus rather than on note durations) using let-ter-ciphers rather than numbers. This early layer of the manuscript, which includes one piece for seven-course lute, contains a few song arrangements (including the ubiquitous De tous biens plaine), a number of ricercares in improvisational style, and a single bassadanza, a setting of the well-known basse danse tenor La Spagna. From the first decade of the 16th century the Venetian prin-ting press of Petrucci distributed music by the early lutenist-composers of the Italian school, who-se influence was felt throughout Europe for the entire 16th century. Although Marco Dall’Aquila obtained a Venetian privilege to print lute music in 1505, no such publications by him have survi-ved. Petrucci published six volumes of lute tablature between 1507 and 1511. The first two books, entitled Intabulatura de lauto (1507), contain works by Spinacino, mainly for solo lute but there are

29

also a few duets. There are 25 pieces called ‘recercare’ but most of the pieces are intabulations of Flemish chansons (from the 1490s) originally for voices. The Intabulatura de lauto, libro tertio (1508), devoted to music by Gian Maria Hebreo, is now lost; the Libro quarto by Dalza (1508) contains dances and a few intabulations of frottolas by contemporary Italians such as Tromboncino. These books include rudimentary instructions for tablature reading and right-hand technique. Songs for solo voice and lute appeared in the Tenori e contrabassi intabulati col sopran in canto figurato per cantar e sonar col lauto (Libro primo, 1509; Libro secundo, 1511), in which the lutenist Franciscus Bossinensis intabulated the lower parts of frottolas whose vocal originals had already been printed by Petruc-ci. The first book contains 70 such compositions, the second 56; each contains 20 or more ricerca-res as well. The six Petrucci volumes form a substantial collection of first-rate music in what must have been a well-established tradition of lute writing. The types of composition they contain evi-dently reflect the unwritten procedures of late 15th-century lute playing. The ‘first phase’ of Italian printed books for lute included one more collection of frottolas with voice part and tablature, by Tromboncino and Marchetto Cara. The sole extant copy is undated, but it certainly appeared in the 1520s.

Among the earliest examples of Italian lute music are two pieces in a Bologna manuscript (after 1484, I-Bu 596). The first page gives an explanation of the tablature headed ‘La mano ala viola’. The-re has been some discussion about the meaning of ‘viola’ in this instance but, since the discovery of Francesco Canova da Milano’s Intavolatura de viola o vero lauto (Naples, 1536/R), it is clear that it refers to the flat-backed, waisted instrument which closely resembles the Spanish vihuela and which was considered suitable for playing lute music. The form of tablature used in this case is the rare ‘Intavolatura alla Napolitana’ in which the second volume of Francesco’s book is printed and which is explained in Michele Carrara’s Regola ferma e vera (Rome, 1585). In appearance it resem-bles Italian tablature but it is the reverse way up, with the figures for the lowest course lying on the bottom line of the staff. The figure 1 is used throughout for the open course.

Few contemporary manuscripts survive, but two are of special importance, both of Venetian pro-venance. The earlier (F-Pn Rés.Vmd 27) dates from the first decade of the 16th century, and, like the earlier Pesaro manuscript, the tablature for the most part omits bar-lines and rhythm-signs. It comprises two sections, the first of which contains 25 ricercares, dances and frottolas for solo lute; a ricercare and the bassadanza on La Spagna are also found in the Pesaro manuscript. The second section contains lute accompaniments to 89 frottolas without the vocal melody. The other manu-script, the Capirola Lutebook (c1517, US-Cn), beautifully written and adorned with drawings by a pupil expressly to ensure its preservation, includes instructions for playing and the use of orna-mentation (see §7 above). The composer, Vincenzo Capirola (b 1474; d after 1548), was clearly the outstanding figure of the earliest period of written lute music.

The acknowledged leader of the following generation, and one of the most famous lutenists of any age, was Francesco Canova da Milano. He was already famous for his remarkable skill at improvi-sation (his contemporaries often referred to him as ‘Il divino’) when his first works were publis-hed: Intabolatura di liuto (Venice, 1536), and the above-mentioned Intavolatura de viola o vero lauto. Some 120 to 150 of his compositions are known today; many continued to appear in print until late in the century and also appeared in manuscript collections in several countries besides Italy. Francesco’s lute music consists chiefly of pieces entitled ricercare or fantasia. He expanded the scope of the quasi-improvisatory ricercare of the older generation of composers, often making greater use of sequence, imitation and repetition, and sometimes writing in the strictly contrapun-tal style that became characteristic of the ricercare during and after the latter part of the 16th cen-tury. There are also many intabulations of chansons and other vocal works, most of which were published after Francesco’s death. (For a modern edition of Francesco’s lute works see The Lute Mu-sic of Francesco Canova da Milano (1497–1543), ed. A.J. Ness, HPM, iii–iv, 1970.)

❧ 30

From 1536 onwards, publishers, clearly exploiting a growing level of demand from dilettante play-ers, frequently issued lute music in books devoted to more than one composer’s music. Five dis-tinguished lutenist-composers are represented in the Intabolatura de leuto di diversi autori published by Castiglione (Milan, 1536); as well as fantasias by Francesco himself, there are several of compa-rable quality by Marco Dall’Aquila, Giovanni Giacopo Albuzio and Alberto da Ripa, as well as dances by Pietro Paulo Borrono.

Marco Dall’Aquila is the most important figure immediately preceding Francesco. A number of his works were printed, but most, including several which may originate from a lost print, are col-lected in a Munich manuscript (D-Mbs 266). The challenge of marrying a strictly imitative compo-sitional style to the technical resources of the lute was also taken up by Alberto da Ripa (works ed. J.-M. Vaccaro, CM, Corpus des luthistes français, 1972–5), whose fantasias, often of considerable length, further add a telling use of expressive dissonance. Borrono seems to have specialized in dance music, although he also composed fantasias. His excellent dances are usually arranged into suite-like groupings of three or more pieces, sometimes with a concluding toccata.

Borrono published several collections of his own works and those of Francesco from 1546 on-wards. In that year a large number of publications appeared containing works by minor composers such as Giulio Abondante, Melchiore de Barberiis, Giovanni Maria da Crema, Marc’Antonio Pifa-ro, Antonio Rotta and Francesco Vindella. Alongside idiomatic dances, fantasias and ricercares appears an almost equal number of arrangements or ‘intabulations’ of ensemble music, usually originally written for voices but occasionally of instrumental music by Julio Segni and others. Of-ten these are hard to distinguish from original lute compositions, and recent research has begun to reveal that extracts of previously composed works were sometimes incorporated without acknowledgement into lute ricercares by many lutenists of the period, including Francesco him-self.

Among the great number of Italian composers for the lute working in the second half of the 16th century, none reached the stature of Francesco Canova da Milano, although Giacomo Gorzanis (from 1561 to 1579), Giulio Cesare Barbetta and Simone Molinaro (1599) published some excel-lent works. All the current types of composition are represented in their works: ricercares and fan-tasias in the contrapuntal style developed by Francesco; intabulations of vocal originals; settings of dances, including the various popular grounds such as the passamezzo antico, the passamezzo moder-no and the romanesca, as well as other famous tunes of the time. Much of this music was for solo lute, but a collection of dances for three lutes by Giovanni Pacoloni, long thought to have been lost, survives in an edition printed by Pierre Phalèse (i) in Leuven in 1564. In 1559 some of Francesco Canova da Milano’s ricercares were published by the Flemish composer Ioanne Ma-telart as Recercate concertate, that is, with a second lute-part or contrapunto, ingeniously converting the original solos into duets. Until the middle of the 16th century, lute music was generally within the prevailing modal ideas of the time, although some composers occasionally departed from strict modal structure. In 1567, however, Gorzanis produced a remarkable manuscript of 24 pas-samezzos, each with its accompanying saltarello, in major and minor modes on all the degrees of the chromatic scale, rising in succession.

True chromatic writing for the lute was rare, although by the end of the century it was beginning to be exploited, notably in works by the Genoese maestro di cappella, Simone Molinaro. The few sur-viving fantasias by the important Neapolitan composer and lutenist Fabrizio Dentice show a great command of the instrument and its contrapuntal possibilities; they are technically demanding, being consistently written in four real parts.

31

Vicenzo Galilei was another important figure of the period, though he is less known today as a composer than as a writer; his theoretical and practical studies are contained in books printed between 1568 and 1589, while further prints and manuscripts preserve a large body of his excel-lent lute music (extracts ed. in IMi, iv, 1934). At this time Italian lutenists were in demand throug-hout Europe; Galilei’s gifted younger son Michelangelo (1575–1631) worked as lutenist for the Po-lish and Bavarian courts (it was said that his brother, the scientist Galileo, was an even finer play-er). Diomedes Cato and Lorenzini were outstanding composers, each with a very personal style. Diomedes served the Polish court for many years, while Lorenzini, said to have received a papal knighthood for his lute playing, was unsuccessfully approached by Lassus as a recruit for the Ka-pelle of the Duke of Bavaria. His technically demanding and expressive music was later collected and published by a pupil, the French lutenist Besard, in his Thesaurus harmonicus (Cologne, 1603). Another distinguished lutenist who does not seem to have left Italy, Giovanni Antonio Terzi, pu-blished two books of his own fine music (1593 and 1599) – fantasias, vocal intabulations and dan-ces – mainly for solo lute but including music for two and four lutes as well as lute parts to be played with other instruments. In Terzi’s second collection the ‘courante francese’ appears for the first time in Italy, presaging the changes in musical style and lute technique that were to result in French dominance of the lute scene for most of the following century.

French influence in dance music becomes increasingly important in the few Italian lute collections of the 17th century, although the expressive Italianate toccata style holds sway in freely composed genres. Michelangelo Galilei (1620) composed suites each comprising an introductory toccata ef-fectively exploiting expressive dissonance followed by a sequence of dances in French style. This quasi-improvisatory style was taken somewhat further in the collections for lute and chitarrone or theorbo (1604, 1611 and 1640) by the lutenist and theorbist of German extraction, Giovanni Giro-lamo Kapsperger, whose idiosyncratic works have been compared with those for keyboard by his Roman colleague, Frescobaldi. A more reserved figure is Kapsperger’s Bolognese rival, Alessandro Piccinini, who was capable of fine works in a severely contrapuntal idiom as well as tuneful dan-ces, virtuoso variations and expressive toccatas, frequently using chromaticism to good effect. A number of pieces by various members of the Garsi family of lutenists from Parma are found in a variety of manuscript sources, suggesting that their music was especially popular among dilettante players such as the owner of one such book (PL-Kj Mus Ms 41053), the Polish or White Russian nobleman K.S.R. Dusiacki (see Garsi, santino).

By the 1620s the lute in Italy was normally fitted with several extra bass courses. A full octave of open basses on an extended neck was standard on the liuto attiorbato (the ‘theorboed lute’) as used in the French-influenced works of Pietro Paolo Melli who, unusually, experimented with scordatu-ra tunings. This type of instrument, whose larger cousin, the arciliuto (archlute), was principally (although not exclusively) used for accompaniment from around 1680, was also called for in the highly virtuoso music of Bernardo Gianoncelli (1650), and again in the Corellian sonatas of Gio-vanni Zamboni (1718). Lute tablature was by this time virtually obsolete in Italy, although the in-strument was used throughout the 18th century. The last significant sources, Filippo Dalla Casa’s manuscripts of 1759 (I-Bc EE155; ed. O. Cristoforetti, 1984), are written entirely in staff notation, a fact which raises the question as to whether more Italian lute music may survive in this form as yet unrecognized.

(ii) Germany, Bohemia and Austria.

Although based in Italy, many of the important figures in the early history of the lute were in fact German, notably the 15th-century blind organist, harpist and lutenist Conrad Paumann, who is said to have invented the German lute tablature system. Outside Italy the first printed lute music appeared in the Germanic states of the Holy Roman Empire. Virdung included instructions for the

❧ 32

lute and one piece as a pedagogical illustration. Schlick’s Tabulaturen etlicher Lobgesang und Liedlein (1512) contains 14 songs for voice and lute and three solo pieces. Judenkünig’s Utilis et compendiaria introductio (c1515–19) and Ain schone kunstliche Underweisung (1523) both include instructions for playing as well as music. The first contains solo lute intabulations of settings of Horace’s odes by Petrus Tritonius published for voices in 1507, together with other similar pieces and dance music; the second is a mixture of dances, lute versions of vocal originals, and five pieces called ‘Priamel’, corresponding to the Italian ricercare. Gerle (1532) gave instructions and music for viol and rebec as well as for lute; his book was reprinted in 1537, and in 1546 a revised and enlarged edition was published. His 1533 book, Tabulatur auff die Laudten), comprises music for solo lute, including inta-bulations and pieces entitled ‘Preambel’.

The publications of Hans Neusidler began with his book of 1536. He was the first writer of in-struction books to show real pedagogic talent; not only did he give clear instructions for both right and left hands, but his pieces are carefully graduated, leading the beginner by gentle degrees through the initial difficulties. Two modified tunings are found in his work: one, known as ‘Abzug’, consisted in lowering the sixth course by a tone, and the other was used in his Judentanz. (The scordatura notation of this piece has been misread by some scholars, who thereby mistook it for an early example of polytonality.)

Collections of music in German tablature continued to be printed until 1592, some under the na-me of the publisher, such as those of Rudolf Wyssenbach (1550) and Bernhard Jobin (1572), others by composer, collector or arranger, such as Sebastian Ochsenkun (1558), Matthäus Waissel (1573, 1591, 1592) and Wolff Heckel (including music for two lutes, 1556, 1562). A total of about 20 or 30 volumes appear to have been printed. Most of these show considerable influence from Italian, French and even Spanish music of the time.

The German system of lute tablature was in use not only in Germanic countries, but was also wi-despread throughout central and Eastern Europe. Its earliest appearance (the Königstein Lieder-buch; see Sources of lute music, §3), however, records a few single-line melodies which may be mo-re suitable for a bowed instrument (identical tablature notation systems were often used for plucked and bowed instruments until well into the 18th century). Although there have been a number of studies of German lute tablature sources, the general lack of modern editions reflects the reluctance of modern lutenists to play from German tablature, which is commonly perceived as more difficult to read than the French or Italian systems. The relative importance of German lute sources has thus been consistently undervalued in the modern revival.

Many of the surviving manuscripts have evident associations with a university milieu, and these ‘student’ lutebooks often incorporate an anthology of Latin verses (frequently amorous), classical quotations and wise proverbs. Their musical content is sometimes less edifying, but they are valu-able as repositories of a very wide range of styles and types of music, from solo pieces (fantasies, preludes etc.), complex intabulated vocal polyphony from the French, Italian and Flemish reperto-ry as well as German chorale settings and Gesellschaftslieder, through to otherwise unrecorded dan-ce and ‘folk’ music, often explicitly labelled with a regional origin. Some of the dance music can be shown to have its origins in polyphonic music and in the repertory of the Stadtpfeifer. An interes-ting characteristic is the late survival in lute sources of otherwise obsolete genres such as the Te-norlied and the Hoftanz. From the late 16th century onwards, formerly popular Hoftänze are often classed as ‘Polish dances’ in German lute sources. In manuscript and printed sources, the non-German music included tends to be predominantly Italian in the early 16th century, but by the end of the century a scattering of French, Polish and other Slavic, Hungarian and other Eastern European, and, increasingly, English dances are identified, many of which prove to be unique sur-vivals.

33

After 1592, German publications for the lute used either Italian or French tablature, although German tablature continued in manuscript sources until about 1620. Important printed collec-tions were those of Adrian Denss (Florilegium, 1594), Matthias Reymann (Noctes musicae, 1598) and Johann Rude (Flores musicae, 1600); these are extensive collections of pieces from the international repertory, and similar compilations continued to appear in the 17th century. The most important of these anthologies was Besard’s Thesaurus harmonicus (Cologne, 1603), mentioned above in con-nection with Lorenzini, Besard’s lute teacher in Rome, whose works occupy a central position in the volume. Others were those of Georg Leopold Fuhrmann (Testudo gallo-germanica, Nuremberg, 1615), Elias Mertel (Hortus musicalis, Strasbourg, 1615), and Johann Daniel Mylius (Thesaurus gratia-rum, Frankfurt, 1622).

Probably as a consequence of the Thirty Years War (1618–48), little music for the lute was publis-hed in German-speaking lands until much later in the century. A few manuscripts, and the evi-dence of paintings and literary sources, suggest, however, that the instrument continued in regular use, in solos and for accompanying the voice. Among the most important manuscripts is that compiled by Virginia Renata von Gehema in Danzig (now Gdańsk) around the middle of the cen-tury (D-Bsb Mus.ms.40624). In common with most such collections, it consists mostly of music by French lutenists such as Mesangeau, the Gaultiers, Dufaut and Pinel, or by their German imitators, leavened with German song settings (and, in this particular case, by an unusual number of Polish dances). The French influence extended to the use of the accords nouveaux on lutes with ten to twel-ve courses. Esaias Reusner (ii), who studied with a French lutenist, in his two published collections (1667 and 1676) mostly used the D minor tuning that was rapidly becoming the standard, but also employed other tunings in a highly idiomatic fashion. While Reusner’s debt to French models, es-pecially Dufaut, is clear, his music is characterized by an increasing tendency towards a cantabile melodic style and an expressive use of dissonance. Philipp Franz Le Sage de Richée seems to have worked for Baron von Niedhardt in Breslau, capital of the German-speaking province of Silesia, a region of much importance in the subsequent history of lute music. In his Cabinet der Lauten (n.p., n.d.; the copy formerly in Riemann’s possession bore the date 1695), he praised Gaultier, Dufaut, Mouton (his former teacher) and the influential Bohemian aristocratic lutenist Count Jan Antonín Losy. His valuable lute-playing instructions were frequently copied into manuscripts and his book was – most unusually – reprinted as late as 1735. A more mysterious figure is Jacob Bittner who a decade earlier published a highly accomplished collection of Pieces de lut (Nuremberg, 1682).

In the Hapsburg lands of Austria and Bohemia, French influence on lute music was, if anything, even stronger, and it seems likely that several French players visited the region. Among the large number of items of lute and guitar music assembled in the great library of the Lobkowitz family at Roudnice are several that suggest close personal contact with Mouton, Gallot and others, inclu-ding the guitarists Derosiers and Corbetta. Local composers for the lute, like their German coun-terparts, tended to imitate the French, while adding touches of Italianate melody, explicitly in the case of movements labelled ‘Aria’, which may reveal the increasing influence of opera. By 1700 the lute was unmistakably an ‘aristocratic’ instrument in Vienna, although T.B. Janovka (Clavis ad the-sauram magnae artis musicae, Prague, 1701/R, 2/1715/R as Clavis ad musicam) stated that lutes were so plentiful in Prague that the houses could be roofed with them. The Viennese lutenists Ferdinand Ignaz Hinterleithner (1699) and Baron Wenzel Ludwig von Radolt (1701) dedicated their publis-hed works to successive music-loving emperors, although neither contains much music of any in-spiration; they are both collections of chamber music for lute with other instruments. Their youn-ger contemporary J.G. Weichenberger left no published collection, and much of his music is lost, but what remains shows some fine qualities, especially in his extended improvisatory preludes.

Count Jan Antonín Losy von Losinthal, the ‘Prince among lutenists’ according to Le Sage de Richée, left a significant number of works in manuscript in an idiomatic and appealingly mixed

❧ 34

French/Italian style. He is best known, however, as the posthumous dedicatee of a tombeau com-posed on his death (1721) by the greatest lutenist of the following generation, Silvius Leopold Weiss (1686–1750), whose influence was felt throughout the German-speaking world. Weiss’s long career embraced early employment in his native city of Breslau, an extended stay in Italy (1708–14) and a lengthy period of employment as one of the stars of the Dresden musical establishment (1717–50). A larger body of music by him survives than by any other lutenist of any age (over 650 pieces) dating from all periods of his life, although establishing a reliable chronology for Weiss’s works is extremely difficult. In his multi-movement pieces, which he always called ‘sonatas’, he took the standard constituent dance forms of the French suite, working them out into impressive structures, often, especially in the later music, of great length. Some require a great deal of virtuo-sity in performance, but all remain highly idiomatic for the lute. In slower movements, such as sa-rabandes and allemandes, Weiss used a three-part texture, the inner voice contributing greatly to the expressive effect, while in faster music such as courantes, gigues and other virtuoso finale mo-vements, the texture becomes predominantly two-part. Many of his sonatas are on an unpreceden-tedly large scale; they can take up to 30 minutes in performance. Most, however, do not survive with integral preludes; these are sometimes found added later to the manuscripts, in a few cases by Weiss himself. This suggests that he supplied them as substitutes or models for a movement that he expected an expert player to improvise. These highly expressive quasi-improvised preludes and fantasies, often employing chromatic harmony, represent some of Weiss’s most characteristic mu-sic. He also composed a good deal of music of a more contrapuntal nature in fugal sections of overtures and fantasies as well as in a number of self-standing fugues.

Among the pieces of J.S. Bach believed to have been intended for the lute (or lute-harpsichord, and thus in direct imitation of lute style) are some fugues (bwv997, 998) which extend the de-mands on the player beyond the normal bounds of idiomatic technique. Bach, although usually restrained in the simultaneous activity of the voices in these works, builds towards contrapuntal climaxes in four real parts, whereas Weiss ingeniously gives the impression of more complexity than in fact is present. Several of Bach’s lute works are adaptations of music originally for solo cel-lo or violin which he made himself or are the work of contemporary lutenists (e.g. bwv997 and 1000, tablature versions by J.C. Weyrauch; bwv995, arranged by Bach, tablature version probably by Adam Falckenhagen), a precedent which has been successfully followed by many of today’s players. Bach clearly admired the instrument, writing expressive obbligato solo parts for the origi-nal versions of the St Matthew and St John Passions and using a pair of lutes in the Trauerode. The suite for harpsichord and violin bwv1025, for some time suspected as a spurious work, has been shown to be an arrangement of a lute sonata by Weiss, and contemporary references testify to the two composers’ acquaintance and mutual respect.

Weiss was the pre-eminent leader among a flourishing community of both amateur and professi-onal lutenists in his time. Among the best-known were Wolff Jacob Lauffensteiner (1676–1754), Adam Falckenhagen (1697–1754), and the Breslau-born players Ernst Gottlieb Baron (1696–1760), already mentioned as an early historian of the lute, and Weiss’s pupil Johann Kropfgans (1708–c1771). Lauffensteiner’s music, and that from the early careers of Baron and Falckenhagen, is similar in style to that of Weiss (which leads to some confusion in manuscript sources). By the 1740s, however, lute composers began to prefer a simpler two-part texture, with increased tre-ble–bass polarization. Later lutenists, such as the expert keyboard player and student of J.S. Bach, Rudolf Straube (1717–c1780) and the Bayreuth violinist Joachim Bernhard Hagen (1720–87), were affected by the somewhat different idioms of their principal instruments, and no trace of influence from the earlier French lute tradition remains. All these players, including Weiss himself, com-posed chamber works for the lute with other instruments, including concertos, although in the case of Straube and, most regrettably, of Weiss himself, none survive in complete form. There was a continuing demand for lute music among German amateurs, as is shown by the large quantity of-

35

fered for sale in Leipzig; over 200 solo works, 23 lute duets, over 150 trios for lute, violin and bass, and 50 concertos for lute with string ensemble feature in various Breitkopf catalogues between 1761 and 1771. A significant repertory of vocal music arranged for the lute, sometimes fully tex-ted, together with occasional written references to the practice, suggests that the lute at least in some circles maintained its traditional role in domestic situations as an accompaniment to the voice. The use of the larger and louder theorbo as a continuo instrument in church and opera house continued as long as there were expert players; Weiss performed in all the Hasse operas in Dresden until late in 1749, and Kropfgans took part in Hiller’s operettas in Leipzig for another two decades after that. Carl Maria von Weber heard Weiss’s son, Johann Adolf Faustinus Weiss, play the theorbo in the Dresden Hofkirche as late as 1811.

Questions of authenticity surround the handful of early works by Haydn in contemporary versi-ons for lute with other instruments, in which the first violin part of a quartet, transposed down an octave and furnished with a simplified bass line, is given to the lute. Some highly idiomatic music in a similar style was composed by the Viennese lutenist Karl Kohaut (1726–82; like Haydn, a member of Baron van Swieten’s circle), including ensemble divertimenti, some challenging concer-tos and a single surviving solo sonata. Towards the end of the century Friedrich Wilhelm Rust composed a set of three sonatas for lute and violin (dated 1791 on one manuscript, but probably composed some years earlier). The last work for solo lute was a set of 12 variations by Christian Gottlieb Scheidler (d 1815) on a theme by Mozart, inspired by the first performance of Don Gio-vanni in Prague in 1787.

(iii) France.

Although the Pesaro manuscript (see §8(i) above) was written in ‘French’ tablature, its repertory and origin are exclusively Italian. The first printed French tablature, using a five-line staff, ap-peared in Guillaume Vorstermann’s Livre plaisant et tres utile (Antwerp, 1529), a translation of Vir-dung’s book of 1511. Virdung’s musical example was replaced with the Flemish chanson Een vrolic wesen (in organ tablature and staff notation as well as for lute). Also in 1529 Pierre Attaingnant at Paris printed his Tres breve et familière introduction; his Dixhuit basses dances of 1530 contained some 66 lute pieces (for a modern edition of some of Attaingnant’s music, see Preludes, Chansons and Dan-ces for the Lute, ed. D. Heartz, 1964).

Between 1551 and 1596 Adrian Le Roy printed books of music for guitar and cittern as well as for lute. His surviving lutebooks extend from Premier livre de tablature de luth (1551) to Livre d’airs de cour (1571) for voice and lute. His instructions for playing the lute survive in English translation, and give a clear description of the technique used in France at the time.

Guillaume Morlaye was associated with the printer Michel Fezandat, also of Paris, who brought out not only Morlaye’s own works (1552–8) but also those of the Italian, Alberto da Ripa (1552–62). Julien Belin’s Premier livre (1556) was printed by Nicolas Du Chemin, and Giovanni Paolo Pa-ladin’s (1560) at Lyons by Simon Gorlier.

In the latter part of the 16th century French music publishing declined somewhat, and few lute-books were issued except for some reprints of earlier works. With the increase of diapason strings, the use of a five-line tablature staff gave way to six lines, and around the end of the century further changes began to appear. Somewhat earlier, the term ‘à cordes avallées’ had been used in one of Gorlier’s guitar books to denote the lowering of certain strings. The application of this term to the lute in Anthoine Francisque’s Le trésor d’Orphée (1600) signified a departure from the basic Renais-sance tuning and foreshadowed a period of transition in which many tuning systems were adop-ted, though the old set of intervals continued in use for some time (see §5 above). The most nota-ble collection of this period was Besard’s Thesaurus harmonicus (1603); the same editor’s Novus par-

❧ 36

tus (1617) includes several pieces for an ensemble of lutes and instruments or voices as well as for solo lute. The ten-course lute figured largely in the books of Robert Ballard (ii) (1611, 1614) and of Vallet (1615, 1619, 1620), who also included a set of pieces for a quartet of lutes. Other distinguis-hed composers for the lute in vieil ton include Julien Perrichon, Victor de Montbuisson, Mercure d’Orléans and Charles Bocquet. Their excellent works include a number of preludes or other im-provisational genres, although dance music predominates.

Together with the increase in the number of diapason strings and the new tunings a marked change of style became apparent. Preludes, courantes, voltas and sarabandes became the favourite forms in the first decades of the 17th century, while intabulations of polyphonic music and the contrapuntal fantasie all but disappeared. The characteristic form of French lute song, the air de cour, sprang from the elaborate court ballets, and flourished between 1571 and 1632.

The eight volumes of Airs de différents autheurs (1608–18), the first six of which were arranged by Gabriel Bataille, include works by all the finest French songwriters of the time and show the influ-ence of musique mesurée à l’antique. Although the exact setting of long and short syllables was not always strict, the verbal rhythms and poetic structure became of prime importance, and the restriction of the bar-line almost entirely disappeared. Many songs of great beauty were written in this style, notably by Pierre Guédron. (See also Chansons au luth et airs de cour français du XVIe siècle, ed. L. de La Laurencie, A. Mairy and G. Thibault, 1934; and Airs de cour pour voix et luth (1603–1642), ed. A. Verchaly, 1961.)

Early works by René Mesangeau and Ennemond Gaultier use the vieil ton, but both composers left a larger body of music in the later tunings. Gaultier in particular favoured the D minor tuning which was to become the norm by the mid-17th century. Three important anthologies under the title Tablature de luth des différents autheurs sur les accords nouveaux were issued at Paris by Pierre Bal-lard (1623, 1631, 1638); unfortunately the earliest does not survive. These present informal ‘suites’ of dances grouped by composer and tuning (strongly associated with key); although the numbers of each dance vary, the order of the ‘core’ component movements – allemande, courante, sarabande – remains fixed. Among the dances, which include sets of branles, there are a few song settings. Some of the composers, including Belleville and Chancy, were fashionable dancing masters who were closely associated with the ballet de cour; others, especially Mesangeau, Pierre Dubut le père and François Dufaut, together with the eminent royal musician Germain Pinel, were prominent and influential lutenists whose works make up a large proportion of the manuscript repertory pre-served in France, Britain and German-speaking countries during the rest of the century.

Coinciding with the emergence of the D minor tuning as the favourite accord nouveau, the 11-cour-se lute (see §3 above) became established as the norm, and seems to have ousted the 12-course in-strument in France by the middle of the century, although the latter retained its popularity in Bri-tain, Germany and the Netherlands for much longer. Players such as Dufaut and Dubut le père adapted to the new tuning with great success, while a new generation of lutenists, among them Denis Gaultier, Jacques Gallot and Charles Mouton produced a major body of expressive work in the classic style précieux of the Paris salon. In the pursuit of rhetorical expression (a goal made ex-plicit in the famous and sumptuously decorated manuscript of Denis Gaultier’s music, La rhétorique des dieux, Paris, c1652; ed. A. Tessier, PSFM, vi–vii, 1932/R) a variety of strokes and fairly extensive ornamentation were expected, even more than those specifically indicated in the notation, and the use of notes inégales was also left to the taste and discretion of the player. (For the solo lute music see Corpus des luthistes français, a series produced by the CNRS, 1957–.)

An integral characteristic of the music of the French Baroque school was a convention of per-formance, reflected in the notation, that came to be known as style brisé; in many passages the

37

notes of the treble and bass (or other voices) were sounded one after another (the bass first) in-stead of simultaneously as was the more general practice in polyphonic music. A related feature was the rhythmic breaking or arpeggiation of chords that were often written plain. This could be indicated by oblique lines placed between the component notes; often, however, such signs, like the explicit notation of notes inégales, were omitted altogether. Perrine, in a passage addressed to harpsichordists as well as lutenists, referred to the convention as ‘the special manner of playing all sorts of lute pieces’; ex.6 shows the interpretation given in his Pieces de luth en musique (1680). It was this style in particular that exerted a considerable influence on the writing of contemporary key-board players and visitors such as the young Froberger. These conventions in the performance of French lute music were clearly considered characteristic of the genre by Germans adopting the French lute style. They are almost always more explicitly notated in the many important German sources of 17th-century French lute music which formed the basis of the German repertory well into the 18th century. Since, furthermore, these manuscripts often preserve large numbers of works (for example, by Dufaut, Gallot and Mouton) not found in French sources their importance is considerable.

(iv) The Netherlands, Spain and eastern Europe.

In Antwerp Guillaume Vorstermann, who had published the French translation of Virdung’s Musi-ca getutscht, brought out a Flemish translation, Dit is een zeer schoon boecxken … opt clavecordium luyte ende fluyte (1554, 2/1568). Of greater scope were the activities of Pierre Phalèse (i), whose first lu-tebook, Des chansons reduictz en tabulature de lut (Leuven, 1545), contained works by many compo-sers. Phalèse, something of a pirate among publishers, specialized in large anthologies of music from all over Europe, collecting vocal as well as instrumental music of many kinds. The only sur-viving edition of Giovanni Pacoloni’s book, with music for three lutes, was published by Phalèse at Leuven in 1564. He later moved his press to Antwerp, where he joined Jean Bellère. Emanuel Adri-aenssen’s books Pratum musicum, 1584, and Novum pratum musicum, 1592, with other editions up to 1600, were printed by Pierre Phalèse (ii) at Antwerp, and contain work by other composers besides Adriaenssen himself, in arrangements for one to four lutes with and without voices.

Joachim van den Hove produced two large collections of works by internationally famous compo-sers: Florida (1601) and Delitiae musicae (1612). His own compositions and arrangements, which demand a sure technique, also appear in them and in a number of manuscripts, two of which are autograph (the Schele manuscript, D-Hs; and Hove, D-Bs). In 1626 Adriaen Valerius published an unusual collection of music for voice, lute and cittern with or without other instruments called Neder-landtsche gedenck-clanck. This was a thinly disguised book of patriotic songs directed against the occupying Spanish forces, using many popular tunes, some of them English. The enormous Thysius manuscript (see Thysius, johan) contains lute music in all the genres of the early 17th cen-tury, including much English music, a large repertory of intabulated sacred and secular vocal mu-sic and a number of pieces for an ensemble of lutes. As far as the rest of the 17th century is con-cerned, although copious iconographical evidence suggests continuing popularity of the instru-ment in the Netherlands, there are almost no surviving musical sources for the lute.

After the expulsion of the Moors in 1492 the history of the lute in Spain becomes obscure. It was referred to by Bermudo as ‘vihuela de Flandes’, implying a degree of unfamiliarity. The only extant books of tablature printed in Spain are for the vihuela, which, though tuned to the same intervals as the lute, is a quite distinct instrument (for an account of its history and repertory see Vihuela). Nevertheless there is much evidence to suggest that the lute was more commonly used than has been generally recognized.

❧ 38

The most famous 16th-century east European lutenist was Valentin Bakfark, born in Transylvania. He wrote some fine fantasias in the Italian manner, and his great renown as a player took him to various courts and the houses of nobles and magnates all over the Continent. His books testify to his cosmopolitan reputation: Intabulatura liber primus (1553) was printed in Italian tablature in Lyons and was partially reprinted as Premier livre de tabelature de luth (1564) in French tablature, by Le Roy & Ballard in Paris. His Harmoniarum musicarum in usum testudinis factarum tomus primus (1565) was printed in Kraków and reprinted in Antwerp (1569), both editions using Italian tabla-ture. Wojciech Długoraj, born in Poland about 1557, published no books of his own, but his works are found in several collections. Jakub Reys (‘Polonois’) was also born in Poland, but went to France when quite young and was appointed lutenist to Henri III; his works are mostly found in French anthologies.

(v) England.

Little is known about the use of the lute in England before the 14th century. Social development was hardly ripe for the general spread of art music outside the church, the court and a few great houses. Under the Tudors, however (following the Wars of the Roses which ended with the seizure of the English throne by Henry VII), a wealthy middle class began to appear, and the few urban centres of population grew at an unprecedented rate. From the time of Henry VIII onwards, ma-nuscripts containing lute tablature began to appear, though none extant dates from before 1540. Most of the professional lutenists at Henry’s court were Flemish or Italian. The three royal child-ren were taught to play, and evidence suggests that in general some amateur performers were be-ginning to become quite proficient.

The growth of the ‘leisured classes’ by about the middle of the 16th century led to a demand for instructions for playing the lute, which was best satisfied by printed books. The register of the Sta-tioners’ Company records licences to John Alde for The Sceyence of Lutynge (1565) and to Robert Ballard (i) for An Exortation to All Kynde of Men How they shulde Learn to Play of the Lute (1567), but nei-ther of these is now extant. The first three surviving instruction books in English are all derived from a single French source, Le Roy’s Tres breve et tres familière instruction, now lost. A Briefe and easye Instru[c]tion (1568) ‘englished by J. Alford Londenor’ contains instructions in the form of rules with music examples, followed by a collection of fantasias and dances. The rules, with certain mi-nor variants, are reprinted as the second part of A Briefe and Plaine Instruction (1574), which also teaches ‘to set all music of eight divers tunes in Tableture for the Lute’ (almost all the examples being chansons by Lassus). The third part comprises a collection of music, quite different from that of 1568, ‘conteinynge diverse Psalmes, and manie fine excellente Tunes’; the latter are versions of French chansons that Le Roy had set for voice and lute in his Livre d’airs de cour (1571). English Protestant taste (the book is dedicated to Edward Seymore, Earl of Hertford) is catered for by the inclusion of metrical psalm tunes.

Le Roy’s instructions were again translated, but without acknowledgment, by William Barley in A New Booke of Tabliture (1596), which also contains sections for the orpharion and bandora. This work is the first printed collection for lute by English composers, and includes, in the bandora sec-tion of the book, the earliest English solo songs with tablature accompaniment. Robinson’s The Schoole of Musicke is a thorough lute method, written in the form of a dialogue ‘between a Knight, having children to be taught, and Timotheus, who should teach them’. The music that follows is all by Robinson himself, and includes some pieces for two lutes as well as fantasias, dances and set-tings of popular tunes for solo lute.

The last English instruction book for the Renaissance lute was Robert Dowland’s Varietie of Lute-Lessons (1610), comprising a translation of the instructions from Besard’s Thesaurus harmonicus

39

(1603) and other observations on lute playing, by John Dowland. These are the only words on the subject that John Dowland left, despite references to ‘my father’s greater work’ in Robert Dow-land's other publication of the same year, the songbook A Musicall Banquet. The Varietie contains a selection of fantasias, pavans, galliards, almains, currants and voltes (by English and continental composers) which must surely have been collected originally by John Dowland on his European travels.

These books, together with a considerably larger body of manuscript collections dating from about 1580 to about 1625, reveal music of the highest quality by composers such as John Johnson (i), Francis Cutting, Richard Allison, Daniel Bacheler, Philip Rosseter, Robert Johnson (ii), Alfonso Ferrabosco (i) (who spent most of his time in England between about 1562 and 1578), and above all John Dowland whose international fame at this time was unique among lutenists.

Solo lute music circulated mainly in manuscript, but starting with Dowland’s First Booke of Songes (1597) a series of songbooks for voice and lute was published in England – some 30 volumes ave-raging about 20 songs apiece. The duration of this vogue was only 25 years (the last collection was John Attey’s First Booke of Ayres of 1622) but it was responsible for some of the finest English songs of any period. A few of the composers also wrote in the madrigal style, and a few also composed solo lute music; but in general the writers of lute-songs in England kept almost entirely to that genre. Its appeal lay in a direction other than that of madrigals or solo lute music, for it entailed a much more concise setting of the text than the former, and had a less abstract emotional effect than the latter.

Many books of ayres were arranged so that they could be performed either as solo songs with lute and usually bass viol accompaniment, or as partsongs for four voices with lute. The favouring of a sustained bass line to balance the melody in the voice reflects the tendency to think in terms of a polarization of harmonic interest between those two parts. Many collections include lute parts as contrapuntal as the texture of a madrigal, but eventually accompaniments showed a tendency to-wards simplification, with less imitative part-writing and more straightforward chordal structure. Ultimately this led to the ‘continuo song’, where only the melody and bass were written down and the lutenist or theorbo player was expected to fill out the harmonies according to certain conven-tions known as the ‘rule of the octave’. The partsong alternative, started by Dowland in his First Booke and originally intended to appeal to a public eagerly immersed in madrigal singing, lent a characteristic stamp to the English ayre that makes it quite distinct from anything produced on the Continent. (For a modern edition of some of Dowland’s music, see Collected Lute Music, ed. D. Poulton and B. Lam, London, 1974, 3/1984.)

Another English use of the lute was in the mixed consort of three melody instruments (treble viol, flute, bass viol) and three plucked (lute, cittern, bandora), a grouping almost certainly conceived originally as an accompaniment to a solo voice somewhat in the manner of the older songs with viols (see Consort, §2). The treble viol, flute and bass viol played in three-part harmony which, of-ten incomplete on its own, was filled in by the three plucked instruments. The cittern and bandora (both wire-strung) formed the alto, tenor and deep bass, while the lute had a dual role. Much of the music was in dance forms, with repeated sections, in the first of which the lute played chords; but in the repeats the lute played elaborate and rapid ‘divisions’, giving a silvery, shimmering quali-ty to the music. This technique was known as ‘breaking the ground in division’; hence the expres-sion ‘broken music’. The light texture of the three melody instruments allowed the lute prominen-ce, while the cittern and the deep bandora provided fullness and body.

Printed collections of music for such a combination include the First Booke of Consort Lessons edited by Morley in 1599 and reissued with additional pieces in 1611 (ed. S. Beck, 1959) and Philip Ros-

❧ 40

seter’s 1609 edition of Lessons for Consort. No complete set of partbooks has survived for any of the editions. There are, however, two manuscript collections (the Matthew Holmes manuscripts in GB-Cu and the Walsingham consort books in GB-BEV and US-OAm), both also incomplete but whose contents overlap to some extent with those of the printed books. Part of William Leighton’s The Teares or Lamentacions of a Sorrowfull Soule (1614) is devoted to ‘consort songs’ set for four voices with the same six instruments.

With the development of the Jacobean and Caroline masque, larger groups of instruments began to appear. In Ben Jonson’s Oberon (1611) ‘20 lutes for the Prince’s dance’ were required, and the description of Love freed from Ignorance (1611) tells of the entrance of ‘12 Musitions that were prees-tes that songe and played’ and ‘12 other lutes’. The theorbo, said to have been introduced into Eng-land by Inigo Jones in 1605, soon found its way into favour in these entertainments. In James Shir-ley’s masque, The Triumph of Peace (1634), as many as seven lutes and ten theorbos were used.

Soon after the death of John Dowland in 1626, however, the English school of lutenist-composers declined. For some time the popularity of the lute had been overshadowed by that of the lyra viol, which was now cultivated by those amateurs who were also avid players of ensemble music for viols. With the coming of Charles I’s wife, Queen Henrietta Maria, and her entourage from France, a fashion grew up at court for all things French. The famous lutenist Jacques Gautier arrived from Paris with the Duke of Buckingham in 1617, was appointed to the court in 1619 and soon became popular in London, where he entered the literary circles of writers such as John Donne.

An interesting English manuscript spanning the change from the ‘old’ lute music of the Elizabet-han and Jacobean composers to that of the new French style was compiled by Lord Herbert of Cherbury. It includes music by Dowland, Rosseter, Holborne and other such composers, along with that of Gautier and some compositions of Cherbury himself, the latest dated 1640. Also re-presented in this manuscript is Cuthbert Hely, who is otherwise virtually unknown. His music is of astonishing intensity: firmly grounded in the earlier English tradition, it nonetheless explores previously untried harmonic territory. Cherbury retained the ‘old’ tuning of the main six courses despite his interest in the new music and the French lute, but the new tunings are in evidence in other manuscripts, such as the latter part of Jane Pickering’s Lutebook where compositions by John Lawrence (d c1635) and Gautier demonstrate the ‘Harpe way’, ‘flat way’ and ‘tuning Gautier’.

With a few exceptions, such as the solos and duos by William Lawes, of which only three pieces survive, and the large quantity of (lost) lute music said to have been composed by John Jenkins, little music of any great value was written for the lute by English composers up to the time of the Civil War; but Lawes, using the theorbo as thoroughbass in his ‘Royal’ and ‘Harpe’ consorts, produ-ced some of the most distinguished instrumental music of his time. During the Commonwealth and at the Restoration, trio sonatas continued to appear for viols or violins with the theorbo spe-cified as a suitable continuo. A set of 30 unnamed pieces for solo lute or theorbo by John Wilson (1595–1674) is of outstanding interest. The pieces are in a distinctive improvisatory preludial style and systematically cover all 24 major and minor keys, with tuning indications to match. Such a scheme was only possible on the lute, whose tablature was unaffected by aspects such as enhar-monic spellings and ‘double’ accidentals, which would have caused great problems in the staff no-tation of the time.

Meanwhile, the French lute and music by French composers began to enjoy considerable populari-ty, although the contents of Richard Mathew’s The Lute’s Apology for Her Excellency (which he claimed was the first printed book for the French lute to appear in England) fall well below the standard of excellence maintained in such manuscript collections as the Hender Robarts Lutebook, the Mary Burwell Lute Tutor (GB-Lam) and the Panmure Lutebook (GB-En). These collections, all compiled

41

by, or under the supervision of, lutenists from Paris, show that the works of the Gaultiers, Vincent, Pinel and other distinguished French composers were familiar to English and Scottish players of the second half of the 17th century. An early 18th-century repertory for the French lute in Scot-land is found in the Balcarres Lutebook, whose approximately 200 pieces consist of dance-tunes (often arranged from fiddle versions) and intabulations of Scottish melodies and well-known English songs such as ‘Lillibulero’ and ‘The King Enjoys his Own Again’, as well as a few French lute pieces.

The last great figure in the history of the lute in England was Mace, whose Musick’s Monument con-tains the most thorough extant set of instructions for the French lute, as well as some appealing music. He discussed technique, ornamentation, playing style, stringing, tuning, care of the instru-ment and many aspects of its history. The section on the theorbo is also valuable.

As a continuo instrument, particularly in accompanying the voice, the theorbo was important throughout the 17th century and well into the first half of the 18th. The theorbo or theorbo-lute is mentioned on the title-pages of many volumes ranging from Angelo Notari’s Prime musiche nuove (London, c1613) through most of Playford’s songbooks to Purcell’s Orpheus Britannicus (1698–1702), John Blow’s Amphion Anglicus (1700) and John Eccles’s Songs for One, Two and Three Voices (1704). Walter Porter included both lutes and theorbos among the accompanying instruments of the consort in his Madrigales and Ayres (1632).

The lute and theorbo were used by Handel in a number of his operas and other works, both as continuo and as obbligato in certain arias, such as ‘The soft complaining flute’ in his Ode for St Ceci-lia’s Day (1739). Players of the instrument were becoming rare, however, and Handel’s occasional use of it was usually due to the presence of a visiting virtuoso player, such as Carlo Arrigoni (in London between 1731 and 1736), who played in the Concerto op.4 no.6, originally scored for ‘Lu-te, Harp and Lyrichord’. According to Burney, the final appearance of the lute in an opera orchestra in England was in the aria ‘Due bell’aline’ in Handel’s Deidamia (1741).

Little more is heard of the lute in England in the 18th century, although the names of distinguis-hed foreign players are occasionally encountered in newspaper advertisements for concerts; S.L. Weiss visited London and gave a short series of concerts in 1718. One player who settled in Lon-don was J.S. Bach’s former pupil, Rudolf Straube, from whom Thomas Gainsborough bought a lute and requested lessons in 1759. A manuscript partially compiled by Straube (GB-Lbl Add.31698) contains annotations in a later hand suggesting that pieces from it were copied by a player of the ‘Theorboe Lute’ up to the late date of 1813. However, the instrument mentioned on a few title pages dating from about 1800 as the ‘lute’ was in actual fact the harp-lute, whose music shows no discernible relationship with the real lute. (For other modern editions of English lute music see the series English Lute Songs, London, 1967–71, and Music for the Lute, ed. D. Lumsden, 1966–.)

Lute (ii): Bibliography

a: ancient and non-european lutes

C. Sachs and E.M. von Hornbostel : ‘Systematik der Musikinstrumente’, Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, xlvi (1914), 553–90 [Eng. trans. in GSJ, xiv (1961), 3–29; repr. in Ethnomusicology: an Introduction, ed. H. Myers (London, 1992), 444–61]

F. Behn : ‘Die Laute im Altertum und frühen Mittelalter’, ZMw, i (1918–19), 89–107

K. Geiringer : ‘Vorgeschichte und Geschichte der europäischen Laute bis zum Beginn der Neuzeit’, ZMw, x (1927–8), 560–603

❧ 42

L. Picken : ‘The Origin of the Short Lute’, GSJ, viii (1955), 32–42

H. Hickmann : Ägypten, Musikgeschichte in Bildern, ii/1 (Leipzig, 1961)

W. Stauder : ‘Zur Frühgeschichte der Laute’, Festschrift Helmuth Osthoff zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. L. Hoffmann-Erbrecht and H. Hucke (Tutzing, 1961), 15–25

G. Fleischhauer : Etrurien und Rom, Musikgeschichte in Bildern, ii/5 (Leipzig, 1964, 2/1978)

R.A. Higgins and R.P. Winnington-Ingram : ‘Lute-Players in Greek Art’, Journal of Hellenic Studies, lxxxv (1965), 62–71

H. Turnbull : ‘The Origin of the Long-Necked Lute’, GSJ, xxv (1972), 58–66

L. Manniche : Ancient Egyptian Musical Instruments (Munich, 1975)

S. Marcuse : A Survey of Musical Instruments (London, 1975), 406ff

L. Picken : Folk Musical Instruments of Turkey (London, 1975), 261ff, 583

C. Ziegler : Les instruments de musique égyptiens au musée du Louvre (Paris, 1979)

M. Maas and J. Snyder : Stringed Instruments of Ancient Greece (New Haven, CT, 1989)

b: western lute, general

LütgendorffGL

VannesE

M. Brenet : ‘Notes sur l'histoire du luth en France’, RMI, v (1898), 637–76; vi (1899), 1–44; pubd se-parately (Turin, 1899/R)

O. Körte : Laute und Lautenmusik bis zur Mitte des 16. Jahrhunderts (Leipzig, 1901/R)

R. Donington : ‘VI: Plucked Strings: IB, 1: The Family of Lutes’, The Instruments of Music (London, 1949, 3/1970)

A. Baines : ‘Fifteenth-Century Instruments in Tinctoris's De inventione et usu musicae ’, GSJ, iii (1950), 19–26

B. Disertori : ‘Remarques sur l'évolution du luth en Italie au XVe siècle et au XVIe’, Le luth et sa mu-sique: Neuilly-sur-Seine 1957, 19–24

D. Gill : ‘The Elizabethan Lute’, GSJ, xii (1959), 60–62

LSJ (1959–) [renamed The Lute in 1982]

G. Hayes : ‘Musical Instruments: Mandora and Lute’, Ars Nova and the Renaissance, 1300–1540, NOHM, iii (1960/R), 487–8

A.L. Lloyd : ‘The Rumanian Cobza’, LSJ, ii (1960), 13–16

M. Morrow and M. Graubart : ‘Lutes and Theorboes: their Use as Continuo Instruments described by Michael Praetorius in his Syntagma musicum ’, LSJ, ii (1960), 26–32

M.W. Prynne : ‘James Talbot's Manuscript, IV: Plucked Strings – the Lute Family’, GSJ, xiv (1961), 52–68

M.W. Prynne : ‘Some Remarks on Lute Forgeries’, LSJ, iii (1961), 17–21

43

M.W. Prynne : ‘The Fretted Instruments, I: the Lute’, Musical Instruments through the Ages, ed. A. Bai-nes (Harmondsworth, 1961/R, 2/1966/R)

M.W. Prynne : ‘The Old Bologna Lute-Makers’, LSJ, v (1963), 18–31

H. Radke : ‘Wodurch unterscheiden sich Laute und Theorbe’, AcM, xxxvii (1965), 73–4

J. Jacquot and A. Souris, eds.: Thomas Mace: Musick's Monument, ii: Commentaire et transcriptions (Paris, 1966)

R.G. Campbell : Zur Typologie der Schalenlanghalslaute (Strasbourg, 1968)

L. Cervelli : ‘Brevi noti sui liutai tedeschi attivi in Italia dal secolo XVIo al XVIIIo’, AnMc, no.5 (1968), 299–337

JLSA (1968–)

E. Pohlmann : Laute, Theorbe, Chitarrone: die Instrumente, ihre Musik und Literatur von 1500 bis zur Gegen-wart (Bremen, 1968, enlarged 5/1982)

F. Hellwig : ‘Makers' Marks on Plucked Instruments of the 16th and 17th Centuries’, GSJ, xxiv (1971), 22–32

B. Tonazzi : Liuto, vihuela, chitarra e strumenti similari nelle loro intavolatura: con cenni sulle loro letterature (Milan, 1971, 2/1974)

H. Radke : ‘Theorbierte Laute (liuto attiorbato) und Erzlaute (arciliuto)’, Mf, xxv (1972), 481–4

F. Hellwig : ‘Zur Terminologie der europäischen Zupfinstrumente: das Vokabularium in den Quel-len zum historischen Lautenbau’, Festschrift für Ernst Emsheimer, ed. G. Hilleström (Stockholm, 1974), 81–6

FoMRHI Quarterly (1975–)

I. Harwood and M. Prynne : A Brief History of the Lute (Richmond, 1975)

M. Saffle : ‘Lute and Related Instruments in Eight Important European and American Collections’, JLSA, viii (1975), 22–48; ix (1976), 43–61

D. Gill : Gut-Strung Plucked Instruments Contemporary with the Lute (Richmond, 1976)

M. Lowe : ‘The Historical Development of the Lute in the 17th Century’, GSJ, xxix (1976), 11–25

R. Spencer : ‘Chitarrone, Theorbo and Archlute’, EMc, iv (1976), 407–23

D. Abbott and E. Segerman : ‘The Names, String-Lengths and Pitch-Standards of Extended-Neck Lutes of the 17th Century’, FoMRHI Quarterly, no.7 (1977), 26–32

H.M. Brown : ‘Trecento Angels and the Instruments they Play’, Modern Musical Scholarship: Oxford 1977, 112–40

D. Poulton : ‘The Lute in Christian Spain’, LSJ, xix (1977), 34–49

W.B. Samson : ‘The Twelve-Course “English Lute”’, LSJ, xix (1977), 50–53

L. Wright : ‘The Medieval Gittern and Citole: a Case of Mistaken Identity’, GSJ, xxx (1977), 8–42

R. Bletschacher : Die Lauten- und Geigenmacher des Füssener Landes (Hofheim am Taunus, 1978)

J. Downing : ‘The Maler and Frei Lutes: some Observations’, FoMRHI Quarterly, no.11 (1978), 60–64

❧ 44

A. Layer : Die Allgäuer Lauten- und Geigenmacher (Augsburg, 1978)

D.B. Lyons : Lute, Vihuela, Guitar to 1800: a Bibliography (Detroit, 1978)

P. Päffgen : Laute und Lautenspiel in der ersten Hälfte des 16. Jahrhunderts (Regensburg, 1978)

D.A. Smith : ‘The Lutes in the Bavarian National Museum in Munich’, JLSA, xi (1978), 36–44

P. Beier : ‘Right Hand Position in Renaissance Lute Technique’, JLSA, xii (1979), 5–24

Gitarre & Laute (Kassel, 1979– )

J. Griffiths : ‘Lutes in the Museo Municipal de Música in Barcelona’, JLSA, xii (1979), 48–66

F. Hellwig : ‘Die Lauteninstrumente im Germanischen Nationalmuseum in Nürnberg’, Gitarre & Laute, i/6 (1979), 6, 8–15

J. Klima : ‘The D minor Lute in Central Europe after the Second World War’, JLSA, xii (1979), 73–7

K. Ragossnig : Handbuch der Gitarre und Laute (Mainz, 1979)

K. Rottmann : ‘The Resurrection of the Lute in Twentieth Century Germany’, JLSA, xii (1979), 67–72

D. and E. Segerman : ‘On Baroque Lute Stringing and Tunings’, FoMRHI Quarterly, no.16 (1979), 26–33

P. Abondance : ‘L'apport de l'iconographie la connaissance du luth’, Le luth et sa musique II: Tours 1980, 139–56

G. Hellwig : Joachim Tielke, eine Hamburger Lauten- und Violenmacher der Barockzeit (Frankfurt, 1980)

H. Heyde and P. Liersch : ‘Studien zum sächsischen Musikinstrumentenbau des 16./17. Jahrhun-derts’, Jb Peters, ii (1980), 231–59

H. Radke : ‘Zur Spieltechnik der deutschen Lautenisten des 16. Jahrhunderts’, AcM, lii (1980), 134–47

D.A. Smith : ‘The Musical Instrument Inventory of Raymund Fugger’, GSJ, xxxiii (1980), 36–44

I. Harwood : ‘A Case of Double Standards? Instrumental Pitch in England c1600’, EMc, ix (1981), 470–81

F. Hellwig : ‘The Morphology of Lutes with Extended Necks’, EMc, ix (1981), 447–54

D. Gill : ‘Mandores and Colachons’, GSJ, xxxiv (1981), 130–41

C. Page : ‘The 15th-Century Lute: New and Neglected Sources’, EMc, ix (1981), 11–21

R. Spencer : ‘Lute and Guitar’, How Music Works, ed. K. Spence and G. Swayne (New York and Lon-don, 1981), 79–92

G. Ferraris : ‘Liuto, arciliuto, chitarrone, strumenti dell'età barocca in Italia’, Il ‘Fronimo’, xxxix (1982), 11–18

C. Page : ‘German Musicians and their Instruments’, EMc, x (1982), 192–200

J.M. Ward : ‘Changing the Instrument for the Music’, JLSA, xv (1982), 27–39

J. Dugot : ‘Description des luths de musée instrumental du C.N.S.M.’, Musique ancienne, xix (1985), 78–84

45

J. Dugot : ‘Some Lutes in Paris Museums’, JLSA, xvi (1983), 27–56; xvii–xviii (1984–85), 53–105

F. Rossi : Il liuto a Venezia dal Rinascimento al Barocco (Venice, 1983)

S. Toffolo : ‘The Corporation of Lute-Makers in Venice: Historical Aspects’, The Lute, xxiii (1983), 29–32

C. Young : ‘Zur Klassification und ikonographischen Interpretation mittelalterlicher Zupfinstru-mente’, Basler Jb für historische Musikpraxis, viii (1984), 67–104

F. Getreau : ‘The Lute Collection of the Paris Museum of Musical Instruments: its Character, For-mation and Development’, JLSA, xvii–xviii (1984–5), 50–52

O. Cristoforetti : ‘Les Piccinini et l'évolution organologique du luth à la fin du XVIe siècle’, Musique ancienne, xix (1985), 4–19

C. Gonzales Marcos : ‘Les luths du Museu de la Música de Barcelona’, Musique ancienne, xvi–xvii (1983), 22–73; xix (1985), 62–77

S. Howell : ‘Ramos de Pareja's Brief Discussion of Various Instruments’, JAMIS, xi (1985), 14–37

N. North : Continuo Playing on the Lute, Archlute and Theorbo (London, 1985)

P.L. Polato : ‘Liutai veneziani nei secoli XVI, XVII e XVIII: ricerca documentaria nell'Archivio di Stato di Venezia’, Flauto dolce, no.12 (1985), 6–15

S. Toffolo and M.P. Pedani : ‘Una famiglia di liutai tedeschi a Venezia: I Tieffenbrucker’, Il ‘Fronimo’, xiii (1985), 56–62

D. Gill : ‘Alternative Lutes: the Identity of 18th-Century Mandores and Gallichones’, The Lute, xxvi (1986), 51–62

H. Heyde : Musikinstrumentenbau im 15.–19. Jahrhundert: Kunst, Handwerk, Entwurf (Wiesbaden, 1986)

Lute Symposium: Utrecht 1986 [incl. M. Lowe: ‘Renaissance and Baroque Lutes: a False Dichotomy: Observations on the Lute in the Seventeenth Century’, 124–39]

I. Watschorn : ‘Einige bau- und spieltechnische Aspekte der “Barocklaute” anhand zeitgenössischer Beschreibungen, Ikonographien und vorhandener Instrumente’, Zupf- und Schlaginstrumente des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts: Blankenburg, Harz, 1986, 33–47

S. Toffolo : Antichi strumenti veneziani 1500–1800: quattro secoli di liuteria e cembalaria (Venice, 1987)

D. Poulton : ‘The Early History of the Lute’, JLSA, xx–xxi (1987–8), 1–21

A. Bollini : ‘L'attività liutistica a Milano dal 1450 al 1550: nuovi documenti’, Il ‘Fronimo’, xvi (1988), 9–23

C. Massip : ‘Facteurs d'instrument et maîtres à danser parisiens au XVIIe siècle’, Instrumentistes et luthiers parisiens: XVIIe–XIXe siècles, ed. F. Getreau and B. de Andia (Paris, 1988), 17–34

H. Minamino : Sixteenth-Century Lute Treatises with Emphasis on Process and Techniques of Intabulation (diss., U. of Chicago, 1988)

F. Pavan : ‘Liutisti itinerati e rapporti culturali fra le corti italiane del primo Cinquecento’, Il ‘Froni-mo’, xvii (1989), 42–53

A. Corona-Alcalde : ‘The Vihuela and the Guitar in Sixteenth-Century Spain: a Critical Appraisal of some of the Existing Evidence’, The Lute, xxx (1990), 3–24

❧ 46

S. Toffolo : ‘Sul rapporto tra liuteria e iconografia in area veneto-lombarda tra Cinque e Seicento’, Liuteria e musica strumentale a Brescia tra Cinque e Seicento: Salò 1990, 45–61

K. Martius and K. Schulze : ‘Ernst Busch und Paul Hiltz: zwei Nürnberger Lauten- und Violenma-cher der Barockzeit’, Anzeigen des Germanischen Nationalmuseums (1991), 145–83

G.M. Ongaro : ‘The Tieffenbruckers and the Business of Lute-Making in Sixteenth-Century Ve-nice’, GSJ, xliv (1991), 46–54

R. Lundberg : ‘In Tune with the Universe: the Physics and Metaphysics of Galileo's Lute’, Music and Science in the Age of Galileo, ed. V.A. Coelho (Dordrecht, 1992), 211–39

J. Sage : ‘A New Look at Humanism in 16th-Century Lute and Vihuela Books’, EMc, xx (1992), 633–41

E. Neubauer : ‘Der Bau der Laute und ihre Besaitung nach arabischen, persischen und türkischen Quellen des 9. bis 15. Jahrhunderts’, Zeitschrift für Geschichte der arabisch-islamischen Wissenschaften, viii (1993), 279–378

S. Toffolo : ‘Sui liutai tedeschi a Venezia nel Cinque e Seicento e sui rapporti tra liuteria tedesca e pittura Veneziana’, Venedig und Oberdeutschlang in der Renaissance, Studi, ix (Sigmaringen, 1993), 197–205

P. Forrester : ‘An Elizabethan Allegory and some Hypotheses’, The Lute, xxxiv (1994), 11–14

C. Meyer : ‘Eine Lauten-Unterweisung aus dem späten 15. Jahrhundert’, Musik in Bayern, no.49 (1994), 25–33

M. Burzik : Quellenstudien zu europäischen Zupfinstrumentenformen (Kassel, 1995)

S. Court : ‘Renaissance Instrumental Ensembles: the Role of the Lute in Sixteenth-Century Con-sorts – Evidence from Terzi's Intabulations’, Performance Practice Review, viii (1995), 147–70

P. Király : A lantjáték Magyarországon a XV. századtól a XVII. század közepéig [Lute playing in Hungary from the 15th century until the mid-17th century] (Budapest, 1995) [with Ger. summary]

L. Sayce : ‘Continuo Lutes in 17th and 18th-Century England’, EMc, xxiii (1995), 666–84

D. Van Edwards : ‘Talbot's English Theorbo Reconsidered’, FoMRHI Quarterly, no.78 (1995), 32–3

K. Martius : Leopold Widhalm und der Nürnberger Lauten- und Geigenbau im 18. Jahrhundert (Frankfurt, 1996)

V.A. Coelho, ed.: Performance on Lute, Guitar and Vihuela: Historical Practice and Modern Interpretation (Cambridge, 1997)

Die Laute (1998–)

S. Pasqual and R. Regazzi : Le radici del successo della liuteria a Bologna (Bologna, 1998)

Acoustique et instruments anciens: Paris 1998

D.A. Smith : History of the Lute from Antiquity to the Renaissance (forthcoming)

c: theoretical and pedagogical

MersenneHU

PraetoriusSM, ii

47

VirdungMG

H. Arnaut de Zwolle : Treatise (MS, c1440; F-Pn lat.7295); facs., Fr. trans. and commentary in G. Le Cerf and E.-R. Labande: Instruments de musique du XVe siècle (Paris, 1932/R)

J. Tinctoris : De inventione et usu musicae (Naples, c1481–3); ed. K. Weinmann (Regensburg, 1917, rev. 2/1961 by W. Fischer)

H. Gerle : Musica teusch (Nuremberg, 1532/R, rev. 3/1546/R as Musica und Tabulatur)

J. Bermudo : Declaración de instrumentos musicales (Osuna, 1555/R)

J.-B. Besard : Thesaurus harmonicus (Cologne, 1603/R; Eng. trans. of appx in R. Dowland: Varietie of Lute-Lessons, 1610)

T. Robinson : The Schoole of Musicke (London, 1603/R); ed. in CM (1971)

R. Dowland : Varietie of Lute-Lessons (London, 1610/R) [incl. section by J. Dowland, and Eng. trans. of appx to J.-B. Besard: Thesaurus harmonicus, 1603]

T. Mace : Musick's Monument (London, 1676/R)

E.G. Baron : Historisch-theoretisch und practische Untersuchung des Instruments der Lauten (Nuremberg, 1727/R; Eng. trans., 1976, as Study of the Lute)

M. Southard and S. Cooper : ‘A Translation of Hans Newsidler's Ein Newgeordent künstlich Lautenbuch ’, JLSA, xi (1978), 5–25

d: construction

I. Harwood : ‘A Fifteenth-Century Lute Design’, LSJ, ii (1960), 3–8

M.W. Prynne : ‘Lute Bellies and Barring’, LSJ, vi (1964), 7–12

F. Hellwig : ‘On the Construction of the Lute Belly’, GSJ, xxi (1968), 129–45

F. Hellwig : ‘An Example of Lute Restoration’, GSJ, xxiii (1970), 64–8

D. Edwards : ‘A Geometrical Construction for a Lute Profile’, LSJ, xv (1973), 48–9

D. Abbott and E. Segerman : ‘Strings in the 16th and 17th Centuries’, GSJ, xxvii (1974), 48–73

F. Hellwig : ‘Lute Construction in the Renaissance and the Baroque’, GSJ, xxvii (1974), 21–30

F. Hellwig : ‘Lute-Making in the Late 15th and the 16th Century’, LSJ, xvi (1974), 24–38

R. Lundberg : ‘Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century Lute-Making’, JLSA, vii (1974), 31–50

D. Abbott and E. Segerman : ‘On Lute Bridges and Frets’, EMc, iii (1975), 295 only

D. Abbott and E. Segerman : ‘Gut Strings’, EMc, iv (1976), 430–37

D. Abbott and E. Segerman : ‘The Geometric Description and Analysis of Instrument Shapes’, FoMRHI Quarterly, no.2 (1976), 7–13

J. Downing : ‘Lute Bridges and Frets’, EMc, iv (1976), 365–7

I. Firth : ‘Acoustical Experiments on the Lute Belly’, GSJ, xxx (1977), 56–63

C. Bouterse : ‘Reconstructing the Medieval Arabic Lute’, GSJ, xxxii (1979), 2–9

❧ 48

M. Lowe : ‘An Assessment of the Progress of Twentieth-Century Lute-Making, with Suggestions for Future Development’, Le luth et sa musique II: Tours 1980, 157–62

G. Söhne : ‘On the Geometry of the Lute’, JLSA, xiii (1980), 35–54

W. Samson : ‘Lute Outlines: a Pragmatic Approach to Geometrical Description’, FoMRHI Quarterly, no.25 (1981), 35–8

R.H. Wells : ‘Number Symbolism in the Renaissance Lute Rose’, EMc, ix (1981), 32–42

S. Barber : ‘Making Lute Moulds’, The Lute, xxii (1982), 21–3

K. Coates : Geometry, Proportion and the Art of Lutherie (Oxford, 1985)

J. Dugot : ‘La facture du luth’, La facture instrumentale européenne: suprématies nationales et enrichèsse-ment mutuel, Musée instrumental du Conservatoire national supérieur de musique de Paris, 6 Nov 1985 – 1 March 1986 (Paris, 1985), 35–51 [exhibition catalogue]

D. Edwards : ‘Gut Strings and Angled Bridges’, The Lute, xxv (1985), 17–28

Lute Symposium: Utrecht 1986 [incl. R. Nurse: ‘Design and Structural Development of the Lute in the Renaissance’, 101–12; J. Dugot: ‘Some Aspects of the Construction of Archlutes and Theorboes in Venice (ca. 1600–1650)’, 113–23]

R. Lundberg : ‘Historical Lute Construction: the Erlangen Lectures’, American Lutherie, no.19 (1989), 6–19; no.20 (1989), 40–53; no.21 (1990), 16–29; no.22 (1990), 20–27; no.23 (1990), 42–53; no.24 (1990), 40–53; no.28 (1991), 8–17; no.29 (1992), 10–19; no.30 (1992), 28–39; no.31 (1992), 46–54; no.35 (1993), 34–43; no.36 (1993), 32–8; no.37 (1994), 32–8; no.38 (1994), 8–17

M. Peruffo : ‘New Hypothesis on the Construction of Bass Strings for Lutes and other Gut-String Instruments’, FoMRHI Quarterly, no.62 (1991), 22–36

E. Segerman : ‘The Size of the English 12-Course Lute’, FoMRHI Quarterly, no.92 (1998), 31–2

e: notation and tunings

W. Apel : The Notation of Polyphonic Music, 900–1600 (Cambridge, MA, 1942, 5/1961; Ger. trans., rev., 1970)

G. Hayes : ‘Instruments and Instrumental Notation: the Lute’, The Age of Humanism, 1540–1630, NOHM, iv (1968), 709–83, esp. 721ff

J. Tichota : ‘Intabulationen und tschechischer Gemeinschaftsgesang an der Wende des 16. Jahr-hunderts’, Musica bohemica et europaea: Brno V 1970, 63–9

H.M. Brown : ‘Embellishment in Early Sixteenth-Century Italian Intabulations’, PRMA, c (1973–4), 49–83

D. Poulton : ‘Graces of Play in Renaissance Lute Music’, EMc, iii (1975), 107–14

M. Lindley : ‘Luis Milan and Meantone Temperament’, JLSA, xi (1978), 45–62

H. Charnassé : ‘Transkription deutsches Lautentabulaturen par Computer’, Gitarre & Laute, i/4 (1979), 16–23

W. Boetticher : ‘Zum Problem der ältesten handschriftlich überlieferten Lautentabulaturen’, Ars mu-sica, musica scientia: Festschrift Heinrich Hüschen, ed. D. Altenburg (Cologne, 1980), 61–5

49

Le luth et sa musique II: Tours 1980 [incl. J. Tichota: ‘Problèmes d'édition des tablatures de rédaction défectueuse’, 43–58; H.M. Brown: ‘La Musica Ficta dans les mises en tablatures d'Albert de Rippe et Adrian Le Roy’, 163–82]

G. Söhne : ‘Regelmässige Temperaturen auf der Laute’, Gitarre & Laute, iv (1982), 98–91

M.L. Göllner : ‘On the Process of Lute Intabulation in the Sixteenth Century’, Ars iocundissima: Fest-schrift für Kurt Dorfmüller, ed. H. Leuchtmann and R. Münster (Tutzing, 1984), 83–96

M. Lindley : Lutes, Viols and Temperaments (Cambridge, 1984)

H. Minamino : ‘Transformation in Intabulation’, JLSA, xvii–xviii (1984–5), 114–17

H.M. Brown : ‘The Importance of Sixteenth-Century Intabulations’, Lute Symposium: Utrecht 1986, 1–29

H.M. Brown : ‘Bossinensis, Willaert, and Verdelot: Pitch and the Conventions of Transcribing Mu-sic for Lute and Voice in Italy in the Early Sixteenth Century’, RdM, lxxv (1989), 25–46

F. Dry : Accords et frettages du luth et de la vihuela d'après quelques traités des XVI et XVII siècles (Paris, 1989)

E. Schulze-Kurz : Die Laute und ihre Stimmungen in der ersten Hälfte des 17 Jahrhunderts (Wilsingen, 1990)

S. Buetens : The Meaning and Performance of Ornament Signs in English Lute Tablatures (Menlo Park, CA, 1991)

J. Le Cocq : ‘The Pitch and Tuning in French Lute Song: 1603–1643’, The Lute, xxxii (1992), 46–71

D. Tunley : ‘Tunings and Transpositions in the Early 17th-Century French Lute Air’, EMc, xxi (1993), 203–11

M. Shepherd : ‘The Interpretation of Signs for Graces in English Lute Music’, The Lute, xxxvi (1996), 37–84

f: repertory

A. Koczirz : ‘Österreichische Lautenmusik zwischen 1650 und 1720’, SMw, v (1918), 49–96; also pubd as introduction to DTÖ, 1, Jg.xxv/2 (1918/R)

H. Sommer : Lautentraktate des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts in Rahmen der deutschen und französischen Lau-tentabulatur (diss., U. of Berlin, 1923)

A. Koczirz : ‘Böhmische Lautenkunst um 1720’, Alt-Prager Almanach (1926), 88–100

P. Warlock : The English Ayre (London, 1926/R)

J. Zuth : Handbuch der Laute und Gitarre (Vienna, 1926–8/R)

L. de La Laurencie : Les luthistes (Paris, 1928/R)

O.J. Gombosi : Bakfark Bálint élete és müvei (1507–1576)/Der Lautenist Valentin Bakfark (1507–1576) (Bu-dapest, 1935, rev. 2/1967 by Z. Falry in Ger. only)

H.-P. Kosack : Geschichte der Laute und Lautenmusik in Preussen (Kassel, 1935)

R. Newton : ‘English Lute Music of the Golden Age’, PMA, lxv (1938–9), 63–90

F.J. Giesbert : Schule für die Barocklaute (Mainz, 1940)

❧ 50

A. Koczirz, ed.: Wiener Lautenmusik des 18. Jahrhundert, EDM, 2nd ser., i (1942)

W. Boetticher : Studien zur solistischen Lautenpraxis des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts (Berlin, 1943)

J.M. Ward : The Vihuela da Mano and its Music (1536–1576) (diss., New York U., 1953)

La musique instrumentale de la Renaissance: Paris 1954

M. Rollin : ‘Le “tombeau” chez les luthistes Denis Gautier, Jacques Gallot, Charles Mouton’, XVIIe siècle, nos.21–2 (1954), 463–79

D. Lumsden : The Sources of English Lute Music, 1540–1620 (diss., U. of Cambridge, 1955)

L.H. Moe : Dance Music in Printed Italian Lute Tablatures from 1507 to 1611 (diss., Harvard U., 1956)

Le luth et sa musique: Neuilly-sur-Seine 1957

D. Heartz : Sources and Forms of the French Instrumental Dance in the Sixteenth Century (diss., Harvard U., 1957)

A. Malecek : ‘Beiträge zur Geschichte der Wiener Lautenspieler’, Jb des Vereins für Geschichte der Stat Wien, xiii (1957), 63–92

J. Jacquot : ‘Le luth et sa musique: vers une organisation internationale des recherches’, AcM, xxx (1958), 89–99

W.S. Casey : Printed English Lute Instruction Books, 1568–1610 (diss., U. of Michigan, 1960)

G. Lefkoff, ed.: Five Sixteenth Century Venetian Lute Books (Washington DC, 1960)

J. Ward : ‘The Lute Music of MS Royal Appendix 58’, JAMS, xiii (1960), 117–25

W. Rubsamen : ‘Scottish and English Music of the Renaissance in a Newly-Discovered Manuscript’, Festschrift Heinrich Besseler, ed. E. Klemm (Leipzig, 1961), 259–84

Z. Stęszewska : Tance polskie z tabulatur lutniowych [Polish dances in lute tablature], i–ii (Kraków, 1962–6)

H. Radke : ‘Beiträge zur Erforschung der Lautentabulaturen des 16. bis 18. Jahrhunderts’, Mf, xvi (1963), 34–51

J. Tichota : ‘Tabulatory pro loutnu a přibuzné nástroje na území ČSSR’ [Tablatures for lutes and related instruments in Czechoslovakia], Studie a materiály k dějinám starší české hudby (Praha, 1965), 139–49

E. Vogl : ‘Lautenisten der böhmischen Spätrenaissance’, Mf, xviii (1965), 28–901

J. Ward : ‘Parody Technique in 16th-Century Instrumental Music’, The Commonwealth of Music, ed. G. Reese and R. Brandel (New York, 1965), 208–28

C.M. Simpson : The British Broadside Ballad and its Music (New Brunswick, NJ, 1966)

K. Dorfmüller : Studien zur Lautenmusik in der ersten Hälfte des 16. Jahrhunderts (Tutzing, 1967)

H.B. Lobaugh : Three German Lute Books: Denss's ‘Floregium’, 1594; Reymann's ‘Noctes musicae’, 1598; Ru-de's ‘Flores musicae’ 1600 (diss., U. of Rochester, 1968)

E. Pohlmann : Laute, Theorbe, Chitarrone: die Instrumente, ihre Musik und Literatur von 1500 bis zur Gegen-wart (Bremen, 1968, enlarged 5/1982) [incl. bibliography]

W.H. Rubsamen : ‘The Earliest French Lute Tablature’, JAMS, xxi (1968), 286–99

51

K. Dorfmüller : ‘Die Edition der Lautentabulaturen’, Musikalische Edition im Wandel historischen Be-wusstseins, ed. T.G. Georgiades (Kassel, 1971), 189–202

H. Radke : ‘Zum Problem der Lautentabulatur-Übertragung’, AcM, xliii (1971), 94–103

P. Danner : ‘Before Petrucci: the Lute in the 15th Century’, JLSA, v (1972), 4–17

D. Heartz : ‘Mary Magdalen, Lutenist’, JLSA, v (1972), 52–67

W. Rave : Some Manuscripts of French Lute Music, 1630–1700 (diss., U. of Illinois, 1972)

A. Rooley and J. Tyler : ‘The Lute Consort’, LSJ, xiv (1972), 13–24

R. Henning : ‘German Lute Tablature and Conrad Paumann: Commemorating the 500th Anniver-sary of his Death’, LSJ, xv (1973), 7–10

U. Henning : ‘The Lute made Easy: a Chapter from Virdung's Musica getutscht (1511)’, LSJ, xv (1973), 20–36

J. Tichota : ‘Francouzská loutnová hudba v Čechách’ [French lute music in Bohemia], MMC, nos.25–6 (1973), 7–77 [with Ger. summary]

T. Heck : ‘Lute Music: Tablatures, Textures and Transcriptions’, JLSA, vii (1974), 19–30

H. Tischler : ‘The Earliest Lute Tablature?’, JAMS, xxvii (1974), 100–03

C.N. Amos : Lute Practice and Lutenists in Germany between 1500 and 1750 (diss., U. of Iowa, 1975)

L. Nordstrom : ‘The English Lute Duet and Consort Lesson’, LSJ, xviii (1976), 5–22

D. Fallows : ‘15th-Century Tablatures for Plucked Instruments: a Summary, a Revision and a Sug-gestion’, LSJ, xix (1977), 7–33

W. Boetticher : Handschriftlich überlieferte Lauten- und Gitarrentabulaturen des 15. bis 18. Jahrhunderts: beschreibender Katalog (Munich, 1978)

J. Jacquot : ‘Le luth et sa musique: from the Neuilly Colloquium to the Corpus of French Lutenists’, LSJ, xx (1978), 7–17

D. Lyons : Lute, Vihuela, Guitar to 1800: a Bibliography (Detroit, 1978)

P. Päffgen : Laute und Lautenspiel in der ersten Hälfte des 16. Jahrhunderts: Beobachtungen zur Bauweise und Spieltechnik (Regensburg, 1978)

Le luth et sa musique II: Tours 1980 [incl. A. Bailes: ‘An Introduction to French Lute Music of the XVI-Ith Century’, 213–29]

C. Page : ‘French Lute Tablature in the 14th Century?’, EMc, viii (1980), 488–91

W.F. Prizer : ‘Lutenists at the Court of Mantua in the Late Fifteenth and Early Sixteenth Centuries’, JLSA, xiii (1980), 5–34

J.-M. Vaccaro : La musique de luth en France au XVIe siècle (Paris, 1981)

D. Ledbetter : ‘Aspects of 17th-Century Lute Style Reflected in the Works of the Clavecinistes’, The Lute, xxii (1982), 55–67

E.A. Bowles : La pratique musicale au Moyen Age/Musical Performance in the Late Middle Ages (Geneva, 1983)

❧ 52

C.P. Comberiati : ‘On the Threshold of Homophony: Texture in Sixteenth-Century Lute Music’, JMR, iv (1983), 331–52

J. Glixon : ‘Lutenists in Renaissance Venice: some Notes from the Archives’, JLSA, xvi (1983), 15–26

F. Marincola : ‘The Instructions from Vincenzo Capirola’s Lute Book: a New Translation’, The Lute, xxiii (1983), 23–8

V. Coelho and others: ‘Studies in the Lute and its Music: Prospects for the Future’, JLSA, xvii–xviii (1984–5), 118–32

V. Ivanoff : ‘Das Lautenduo im 15. Jahrhundert’, Basler Jb für historische Musikpraxis, viii (1984), 147–62

J.M. Meadors : Italian Lute Fantasias and Ricercars Printed in the Second Half of the Sixteenth Century (diss., Harvard U., 1984)

J. Tichota : ‘Bohemika a český repertoár v tabulaturách pro renesanční loutnu’ [Bohemiana and the Czech repertory in tablature for the Reniassance lute], MMC, no.31 (1984), 143–222

D.J. Buch : ‘Style brisé, style luthée, and the choses luthées’, MQ, lxxi (1985), 52–67, 220–21

P. Päffgen : ‘Ein artliches Lob der Lauten: Blüte und Niedergang von Laute und Lautenspiel im 16.–18. Jahrhundert’, Concerto, ii (1985), 48–55

R. Toft : ‘An Approach to Performing the Mid 16th-Century Italian Lute Fantasia’, The Lute, xxv (1985), 3–16

L. Hoffmann-Erbrecht : ‘Lautenspiel und Lautenkomposition in Schlesien’, Musikgeschichte Schlesiens (Dülmen, 1986), 77–89

Lute Symposium: Utrecht 1986 [incl. A.J. Ness: ‘The Siena Lute Book and its Arrangements of Vocal and Instrumental Part-Music’, 30–49; L. Nordstrom: ‘The Lute in Settings for Consort’, 50–63]

S. McCoy : ‘Lost Lute Solos Revealed in a Paston Manuscript’, The Lute, xxvi (1986), 21–39

T.J. McGee : ‘Instruments and the Faenza Codex’, EMc, xiv (1986), 480–90

C. Meyer : Contributions à l'étude des sources de la musique de luth dans les Pays germaniques au XVIIème siècle (diss., U. of Strasbourg II, 1986)

H. Minamino : ‘Conrad Paumann and the Evolution of Solo Lute Practice in the Fifteenth Centu-ry’, JMR, vi (1986), 291–310

W.F. Prizer : ‘The Frottola and the Unwritten Tradition’, Studi musicali, xv (1986), 3–37

D. Ledbetter : Harpsichord and Lute Music in 17th-Century France (London, 1987)

S. McCoy : ‘Edward Paston and the Textless Lute-Song’, EMc, xv (1987), 221–7

P. Päffgen : ‘Lautenmusik vor 1500’, Gitarre & Laute, ix/6 (1987), 58–61

M. Spring : The Lute in England and Scotland after the Golden Age, 1629–1750 (diss., U. of Oxford, 1987)

D.J. Buch : ‘Texture in French Baroque Lute Music and Related Ensemble Repertories’, JLSA, xx–xxi (1987–8), 120–54

R. d'A. Jensen : The Lute Ricercar in Italy, 1507–1517 (diss., U. of California, 1988)

J.J. Kmetz, ed.: Die Handsschriften der Universitätsbibliothek Basel. Katalog der Musikhandschriften des 16. Jahrhunderts: Quellenkritische und historische Untersuchung (Basle, 1988)

53

A. Schlegel : ‘Bemerkungen zur “Rhétorique des dieux”’, Gitarre & Laute, xi/2 (1989), 17–23

J. Griffiths : ‘Une fantaisie de la Renaissance: an Introduction’, JLSA, xxiii (1990), 1–16

D. Ledbetter : ‘French Lute Music 1600–1650: Towards a Definition of Genres’, The Lute, xxx (1990), 25–47

D. Fabris : ‘Influenze stilistiche e circolazione manoscritta della musica per liuto in Italia e in Fran-cia nella prima metà del Seicento’, RdM, lxxvii (1991), 311–33

D. Fabris : ‘Voix et intruments pour la musique de danse: à propos des airs pour chanter et danser dans les tablatures italiennes de luth’, Le Concert des voix et des instruments à la Renaissance: Tours 1991, 389–422

C. Meyer and others: Sources manuscrites en tablature: luth et théorbe (ca. 1500–ca. 1800), catalogue des-criptif, i–iii (Baden-Baden, 1991–9)

R. Eberlein : ‘The Faenza Codex: Music for Organ or for Lute Duet?’, EMc, xx (1992), 460–66

M. Gómez : ‘Some Precursors of the Spanish Lute School’, EMc, xx (1992), 583–93

C. Meyer : ‘Quelques aspects de la diffusion de la musique de luth dans les Pays rhénans à l'époque de la Renaissance et du Baroque’, Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für mittelrheinische Musikgeschich-te, lix (1992), 363–72

K. Polk : German Instrumental Music of the Late Middle Ages: Players, Patrons and Performance Practice (Cambridge, 1992)

J.M. Ward : Music for Elizabethan Lutes (Oxford, 1992)

J. Craig-McFeely : English Lute Manuscripts and Scribes 1530–1630 (diss., U. of Oxford, 1993)

D. Kirsch and L. Meierott : Berliner Lautentabulaturen in Krakau (Mainz, 1993)

V.A. Coelho : The Manuscript Sources of Seventeenth-Century Italian Lute Music (New York, 1995)

P. Lay : ‘French Music for Solo Theorbo: an Introduction’, Lute News, no.40 (1996), 3–7

V.A. Coelho, ed.: Lute, Guitar and Vihuela: Historical Practice and Modern Interpretation (Cambridge, 1997) [incl. D. Fabris: ‘Lute Tablature Instructions in Italy: a Survey of the Regole from 1507–1759’, 16–46]

A. Brinzing : ‘Formen und Traditionen in den deutschen Lautentänzen des 16. Jahrhunderts’, Die Laute, i (1998), 5–17

P. Király : ‘Einige Beobachtungen und Anmerkungen ber Lautenmusikquellen, Lautenisten und Amateure im 16. und frühen 17. Jahrhundert’, Die Laute, i (1998), 24–44

❧ 54

Tablature

Although the German system of notating lute music is possibly the oldest, it appears that the three principal systems of lute tablature were developed almost simultaneously in the second half of the 15th century. Their basic principle was to guide the fingers of the player’s left hand over the lattice, formed by courses and frets crossing at right angles, on the fingerboard. (In the following explana-tions ‘course’ will have its standard meaning. The usual 16th-century lute had seven frets and six courses of strings, usually tuned G–c–f–a–d'-g' or A–d–g–b–e'–a'; in general, France and England used the G tuning, Italy, Spain and Germany the A tuning. Each course consisted of either a single string or a pair of strings, the strings of a pair being tuned either in unison or at the octave; later instruments acquired extra frets and more strings: see Lute). Each intersection of fret and course corresponded to a specific note, and an efficient system of notation therefore needed to identify each such intersection clearly and unmistakably. Even on a 15th-century lute with only five cour-ses and five frets there were 30 such intersections (including the open strings) and on an early 17th-century theorbo-lute there might have been seven courses, up to 12 frets, and also six or se-ven ‘diapasons’ (open strings running clear of the fingerboard). The tablature for such an instru-ment needed to be capable of directing the player to form almost 100 notes. Moreover, the lute was required to give the impression of polyphonic part movement, so the tablature symbols nee-ded to be capable of being grouped together two, three or four at a time. One area of inadequacy that lute tablatures share with Spanish keyboard tablatures is that the value of only the shortest of the notes to be played simultaneously could be notated precisely.

(i) Germany, 1511–1620.

Although the earliest known printed example of the cumbersome German tablature, in Sebastian Virdung’s Musica getutscht (fig.4), dates from 1511, the fact that the system was clearly designed for a five-course lute with five frets shows that it must have been invented considerably earlier. Ac-cording to Virdung the system was attributed to the blind organist Conrad Paumann (1410–73). The open courses are numbered 1 to 5, with 1 corresponding to the bottom course, and each inter-section of fret and course is denoted by a letter of the alphabet running across the fingerboard from bottom course to top. In order to provide the 25 symbols required, the common abbrevia-tions for ‘et’ and ‘con’ were added to the 23 letters of the German alphabet; for higher frets the al-phabet was repeated either in doubled letters or in letters with a dash above them (aa or ā, bb or betc.). When a sixth course was added below the original five it was not possible to extend this closed system in any logical way, and several compromise solutions were used. The German tabla-ture, with the most important of its alternative forms, is given in the diagram shown as ex.9. In practice, symbols intended to be played simultaneously were grouped in vertical columns; rhythm signs were placed above each note or group of notes, often grouped in twos or fours. The music was usually barred regularly (ex.10).

55

The German tablature was strongly criticized as early as 1528 by Martin Agricola, although the alternative system he proposed was not adopted anywhere. Melchior Neusidler tried to introduce Italian lute tablature into Germany in the mid-16th century, but he met with much opposition.

(ii) Italy, 1500–1650.

The Italian system was more logical than German lute tablature since it was a visual representation of the fingerboard. Its clarity and ease of application remained, however many courses or frets the instrument possessed. Each course was represented by a horizontal line, the bottom course corres-ponding to the top line (fig.5; in the playing position the bottom course of the lute is nearest to the

❧ 56

player’s eye). The ‘staff’ formed in this way normally had six lines (i.e. as many as there were cour-ses). The open course was represented by a figure 0 on the appropriate line, the first fret by 1, the second by 2 and so on, the 10th, 11th and 12th frets being represented by the special single sym-bols x, x and x since a double symbol like 10 might be confused with the two separate symbols 1 and 0. Rhythm signs were shown above the notes; at first they were repeated for each note or chord (see ex.11), but from about 1530 onwards a more economical system prevailed whereby each rhythm sign remained valid until it was replaced by another. In later sources, both printed and manuscript, the normal staff notation rhythm signs tended to replace the traditional lute ones. Diapasons were shown as numbers (from 7 to 14) set between the ‘staff’ and the rhythm signs. Ita-lian tablature was used for some books printed in Kraków, Lyons and Strasbourg in the second half of the 16th century, and a few English and Austrian manuscripts are known (e.g. GB-Lbl Add.29246–7 and 31992); but it was mainly confined to Italy.

(iii) Spain, 1530–80.

The indigenous Spanish instrument of the lute family was the vihuela, tuned and played like a lute, but shaped and strung slightly differently. Spanish tablature closely resembled Italian, although exceptionally, as in Milán’s El maestro (1536), the six-line ‘staff’ was inverted so that the top line re-presented the highest course of the vihuela (fig.6). Occasionally a vocal line was included in staff notation above the tablature, as in Germany and Italy; or it might be incorporated in the tablature itself in red numerals. In some collections of Spanish lute music the compositions are barred in units of one semibreve, a system of barring that differs from that of most barred lute sources. Or-dinary staff notation rhythm signs were used (see ex.12).

57

(iv) France, 1500–1815.

The French form of lute notation, adopted by English composers, was the most successful of all lute tablatures, and it eventually superseded the others (although not for guitar music). It used a five- or six-line ‘staff’ in which, as in Milán’s book, the top line represented the highest course. The frets, however, were lettered and not numbered, the open string being ‘a’ or ‘A’, the first fret ‘b’ or ‘B’, and so on. To assist the eye in distinguishing between similar letters these were soon given special forms; the commonest lute alphabet is shown in ex.13. The letters were placed either on or above the line to which they referred. Lute and, later, staff notation rhythm signs were used, placed as usual above the ‘staff’. Letters or figures beneath it denoted diapasons (fig.7); their tuning someti-mes varied according to the key of the piece, but they usually descended diatonically (a, /a, //a, ///a, ////a …; 7, 8, 9, 10 or X, 11 …). In English lute music plain letters below the ‘staff’ often de-noted a seventh course running over the fingerboard and tuned a 4th below the sixth course.

(v) Supplementary signs.

Many of the niceties of lute playing were indicated by special signs, the most important of which are listed here. A dot beneath a symbol sometimes meant that the chord was to be struck from above instead of, as normally, from below; it was more likely, however, to have been a fingering in-dication for the right hand (· = 1st, ·· = 2nd, ∴ or ∵ = 3rd, ···· = little finger). A vertical line facilita-ted orientation when the components of a chord were widely spaced. An asterisk, cross or oblique stroke by the side of a symbol showed that the stopping finger must be held down on its fret for as long as possible, thus sustaining the note or notes in question. A numeral by a symbol showed left-hand fingering. Slurs joining two symbols indicated a special kind of legato playing, only the first of the two notes being plucked. A wide variety of special signs was used to indicate trills and or-naments (see Dodge and Spencer).

BIBLIOGRAPHY

WolfHG. Gasparini: Storia della semiografia musicale (Milan, 1905/R1984 in BMB, section 2, lix)J. Dodge: ‘Ornamentation as Indicated by Signs in Lute Tablature’, SIMG, ix (1907–8), 318–36O. Chilesotti: ‘Notes sur les tablatures de luth et de guitare’, EMDC, I/ii (1914), 636–84L. Schrade: Die ältesten Denkmäler der Orgelmusik (Münster, 1928)

❧ 58

W. Apel: The Notation of Polyphonic Music, 900–1600 (Cambridge, MA, 1942, 5/1961; Ger. trans., rev., 1970)K. Dorfmüller: ‘La tablature de luth allemande et les problèmes d’édition’, Le luth et sa musique: Neuilly-sur-Seine 1957, 245–57A. Woodford: ‘Music for Viol in Tablature: Manuscript Sources in the British Museum’, Chelys, ii (1970), 23–33H. Ducasse: ‘Un problème de saisie de l’information: le traitement des tablatures’, Informatique musicale: Paris 1973, 48–65J. Eppelsheim: ‘Buchstaben-Notation, Tabulatur und Klaviatur’, AMw, xxxi (1974), 57–72R. Spencer: Introduction to The Board Lute Book (Leeds, 1976) [facs.]R. Rastall: The Notation of Western Music (London and New York, 1983, 2/1998)

Silvius [Sylvius] Leopold Weiss

(b Breslau [now Wrocław], ?12 Oct 1686; d Dresden, 16 Oct 1750). A son of (1) Johann Jacob Weiss, he was trained by his father and in his seventh year he performed for Emperor Leopold I. By 1706 he was in the service of Count Carl Philipp of the Palatinate, who was then resident in Breslau. His earliest datable sonata, no.7 (1706), was written while he was on a visit to the court of the count’s brother in Düsseldorf. He spent 1710–14 in Italy with the Polish Prince Alexander So-biesky. The prince lived in Rome with his mother Queen Maria Casimira, who engaged first Ales-sandro and later (1709) Domenico Scarlatti as her music director. Thus Weiss doubtless worked with the Scarlattis, and probably was exposed to the music of Corelli and other composers in Ro-me. After the prince’s death in late 1714 Weiss returned to the North. He reentered the service of Carl Philipp, now Imperial Governor of the Tyrol, perhaps as early as 1715. By 1717 he was listed as a member of the chapel at the Saxon court in Dresden. He was formally appointed to the chapel in August 1718 with a high salary, and by 1744, he was the highest-paid instrumentalist at the court. Weiss’s activity as a performer nearly came to a premature end when in 1722 he was at-tacked by a French violinist named Petit who attempted to bite off the top joint of his right thumb. Handwritten notes by Weiss found in continuo parts to operas by J.A. Hasse which were perfor-med at court between 1731 and 1749, suggest that Weiss was regularly involved in ensemble per-formance (see Burris); this activity may have been as important as his duties as a solo performer.

Weiss’s travels took him to many other courts for short visits. He was in Prague in 1717 (and again in 1719); in September 1718 he was sent in the company of the Saxon Crown Prince Frederick Augustus with eleven of the court's best musicians to Vienna where again he played for the Em-peror. In 1722 he performed at the Bavarian court in Munich with the flautist P.G. Buffardin. Toge-ther with Quantz and C.H. Graun, Weiss went to Prague in 1723 to play in the orchestra in Fux’s opera Costanza e fortezza celebrating the coronation of Charles VI. In 1728, along with Pisendel, Quantz and Buffardin, he accompanied Elector August to Berlin, where he made a profound im-pression on the future King Frederick the Great and his sister Wilhelmine, herself an accomplis-hed lutenist, to whom Weiss gave lessons. Weiss was much in demand throughout his career as a teacher of both amateurs and professionals. He taught Prince Philipp Hyacinth Lobkowitz and his wife in Bohemia and Vienna and in Dresden he trained several distinguished professional lute-nists, including Adam Falckenhagen and Johann Kropfgans. With Kropfgans he visited J.S. Bach in Leipzig in 1739; this was likely not their first meeting nor their last since Bach came numerous times to Dresden to see his son Wilhelm Friedemann and to hear the court musicians. Despite his high salary, Weiss’s material circumstances may not have been particularly comfortable. He mar-ried Maria Elizabeth (c1700–59) about the time of his appointment in Dresden and together they

59

had 11 children. At his death seven of them were still living and his impoverished widow appealed to the Elector for aid.

Both as virtuoso performer and as composer Weiss can be regarded as the greatest lutenist of the late Baroque and a peer of keyboard players such as J.S. Bach and Domenico Scarlatti. He left the largest corpus of music for lute of any composer in the history of the instrument. Most of the hundreds of pieces which survive are grouped into six-movement sonatas with the sequence alle-mande, courante, bourrée, sarabande, minuet and gigue (or allegro). The structure of these sona-tas, called Suonaten or Partien, remained remarkably unchanged from the earliest to the latest peri-od, although substitutions for one or more of the movements are common. Some begin with an unbarred prelude or a fantasia; Weiss’s practice was probably to improvise the prelude and most were never written down. The style of Weiss's music is, like Bach’s, a German fusion of French and Italian influences. It is not as densely contrapuntal or chromatic as Bach's – the baroque lute (par-ticularly the diatonic arrangement of the basses) does not permit it – but Weiss’s harmonic usage is highly sophisticated and involves modulations to remote keys, particularly in the later works, by means of diminished seventh chords and enharmonic changes. His allemandes and sarabandes are often serious or melancholy while the fast movements are exhilarating, displaying a virtuosity which, like Corelli’s, serves the forward drive of the music rather than the desire to dazzle. In his own day he was famous for his ‘Weissian method’ of playing (Baron), which probably refers to his masterly fingerings and idiomatic legato style. In the course of his career Weiss wrote increasingly extended movements and began to coordinate thematic motifs with the harmonic structure in a manner strikingly similar to Classical sonata form. Bach clearly had great respect for Weiss’s sona-tas since he arranged no.47 as a duo for harpsichord and violin (BWV 1025), composing new ma-terial for the violin part and constructing an introductory fantasia using lutenistic motifs that may stem from Weiss. As well as solo sonatas, Weiss is known (from Breitkopf 's and other catalogues) to have composed several concertos and much chamber music for the lute and a number of lute duets; unfortunately none of these concerted pieces has survived in complete form. Occasionally a single tablature lute part has been discovered; in such cases only speculative reconstruction is pos-sible.

Editions:Silvius Leopold Weiss, Sämtliche Werke für Laute in Tabulatur und Übertragung, i–iv, ed. D.A. Smith (Frankfurt, 1983–90), v–x, ed. T. Crawford (Kassel, 2000–) [SC]Silvius Leopold Weiss, Intavolatura di liuto, ed. R. Chiesa (Milan, 1967–8) [CH]Deutsche Lautenmusik des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts: Solowerke von Esaias Reusner und Silvius Leopold Weiss, ed. H. Neemann, EDM, 1st ser., xii (1939) [N]The Moscow ‘Weiss’ Manuscript, ed. T. Crawford (Columbus, OH, 1995) [CR]Silvius Leopold Weiss: 34 Suiten für Laute Solo, ed. W. Reich (Leipzig, 1977) [facs. of MS in D-Dlb; incl. SC nos.33–60]Music for the Lute: Ernst Gottlieb Baron and Sylvius Leopold Weiss, with introduction by A. Schlegel (Peer, 1992) [facs.of MS in B-Brl] [SCH]Catalogue in BrookB [repr. of 1769 Breitkopf catalogue], cols.369–75 [60 numbered partitas and 6 Partite Grande] [B]Catalogue in Klima (1974) [K]Catalogue in appendix to Smith (1977) [S]E.G. Baron: Historisch-theoretisch und practische Untersuchung des Instruments der Lauten (Nuremberg, 1727/R; Eng. trans., 1976, as Study of the Lute, 1976)

❧ 60

J.C. Gottsched: Handlexicon oder Kurzgefasstes Wörterbuch der schönen Wissenschaften und freyen Künste (Leipzig, 1760)H.L. Volkmann: ‘Silvius Leopold Weiss, der letzte grosse Lautenist’, Die Musik, vi (1906–7), 274–89H. Neemann: ‘Die Lautenhandschriften von Silvius Leopold Weiss in der Bibliothek Dr. Werner Wolffheim’, ZMw, x (1927–8), 396–414K. Prusik: ‘Die Sarabande in den Solopartien des Lautenisten Sylvius Leopold Weiss’, Festschrift Adolph Koczirz, ed. R. Haas and J. Zuth (Vienna, 1930), 36–7H. Neemann: ‘Die Lautenistenfamilie Weiss’, AMf, iv (1939), 157–89 [with extensive work-list]J. Klima: Silvius Leopold Weiss, 1686–1750: Kompositionen für die Laute: Quellen und Themenverzeichnis (Vienna, 1975)D.A. Smith: ‘Baron and Weiss contra Mattheson: in Defense of the Lute’, JLSA, vi (1973), 48–62D.A. Smith: The Late Sonatas of Silvius Leopold Weiss (diss., Stanford U., 1977) [incl. index of incipits and concordances for 580 solo lute pieces of S.L. Weiss]D.A. Smith: ‘Sylvius Leopold Weiss: Master Lutenist of the German Baroque’, EMc, viii (1980), 47–58D.A. Smith: : ‘Editing 18th-Century Lute Music: the Works of Silvius Leopold Weiss’, Le luth et sa musique II: Tours 1980, 253–60K. Spaar: : ‘A Poet's Description of the Lute Playing of Silvius Leopold Weiss, and a Possible Link between Weiss and David Kellner’, JLSA, xix (1986), 58–67O. Arnautova: ‘"Moskovskiy manuskript" Leopol'da Sil'viusa Vaysa', Starinnaya muzïka v kontekste sovremennov kul'tori: Moscow 1989, 527–37D.A. Smith: ‘La ricerca su Weiss: il passato, il presente e il futuro', Bollettino della Societa Italiana del Liuto, iii (1993)C. Wolff: ‘Das Trio A-Dur BWV 1025: eine Lautensonate von Silvius Leopold Weiss bearbeitet und erweitert von Johann Sebastian Bach', BJb 1993, 47–67K.-E. Schröder: ‘Zum Trio A-Dur BWV 1025', BJb 1995, 47–60T. Crawford: Introduction to The Moscow 'Weiss' Manuscript (Columbus, OH, 1995), 2–42T.A. Burris: Lute and Theorbo in Vocal Music in 18th-Century Dresden (diss., Duke U., Durham, NC, 1997)

Visée, Robert de

(b ? c1655; d 1732–3). French guitarist, theorbo, lute and viol player and composer. He was possibly a pupil of Corbetta. He is first mentioned (as theorbist and guitarist) by Le Gallois in 1680, and about that time became a chamber musician to Louis XIV. In the dedication of his first guitar book (1682) he mentions that he was often called upon by the king to amuse the dauphin, and the diary of the Count of Dangeau from the year 1686 states that he regularly played the guitar at the king’s bedside in the evenings. Between 1694 and 1705 Visée frequently performed at the French court, particularly at the evening gatherings of Mme de Maintenon, with the flautists Descoteaux and Philibert, the harpsichordist Jean-Baptiste Buterne and the viol player Antoine Forqueray. In 1709 he was appointed to the post of singer in the royal chamber in recognition of his service to the court, in which he had not until then held a position. In 1719 he was formally appointed guitar teacher to the king, although he had actually been the king’s instructor since 1695; his son Fran-çois succeeded him in this post in 1721. A letter of Jean Rousseau of 1688 indicates that Visée was a respected musician at Versailles and that he also played the viol.

61

Visée’s two published guitar books contain a total of 12 suites as well as several miscellaneous pie-ces. The longer suites generally begin with the usual allemande, courante, sarabande and gigue and end with lighter pieces such as the gavotte, minuet and bourrée. In the shorter suites there is no consistent order of movements. The Suite no.6 in C minor includes a beautiful tombeau dedicated to Corbetta. Visée’s guitar compositions are intended for a five-course instrument tuned a/a–d/d'–g/g–b/b–e'. Exploiting the instrument’s resources to the fullest extent, they constitute along with the later works of Corbetta the apex of the French Baroque guitar literature. Visée’s works for Baroque lute and theorbo comprise the same types of dance pieces as are found in his guitar music and of-ten duplicate the guitar works, although it is difficult to determine for which instrument the origi-nal versions were written. The fact that a substantial number of theorbo works survives in manu-script sources shows the regard in which Visée was held. Though they lack character pieces and Italian influence, they reveal him as a fitting partner for his colleagues Marin Marais and François Couperin. These pieces also include various tombeaux as well as arrangements of pieces by Lully, Marais, Forqueray and François Couperin.

BIBLIOGRAPHYBenoitMCLa BordeEC. Liddell: The Guitar, Theorbo and Lute Works of Robert de Visée: a Study in his Process of Arranging (diss., Schola Cantorum Basiliensis, 1976)A. Dunn: Style and Development in the Theorbo Works of Robert Visée: an Introductory Study (diss., U. of California, San Diego, 1989)B.L. Prud’homme: A Source Study and Thematic Catalogue of Robert de Visée’s Theorbo Works (diss., U. of Colorado, 1992)A. Miteran: ‘Manuscrit inédit de Robert de Visée’, Guitare, lv (1995), 32–4

Gallot.

French family of lutenists. They were active in the 17th century. Jacques and Pierre, who were also composers, were considered by their contemporaries to be among the most accomplished players of their time.

(1) Alexandre Gallot

(b 1625–30; d 1684). Lutenist and composer. He was known as ‘vieux Gallot d'Angers’ and he was maître de luth in that town about 1663. Four pieces are attributed to him in René Milleran's manu-script lutebook (F-Pn Rés.823) which was compiled in about 1690.

2) Jacques Gallot

(d Paris, c1690). Lutenist and composer, brother of (1) Alexandre Gallot. He was known as ‘vieux Gallot de Paris’. He was a pupil of Ennemond Gaultier. His Pièces de luth composées sur differens modes (Paris, n.d.) includes a brief method for the lute. The inclusion of minuets and the arrangement of pieces by keys and forms anticipate the later suite. In addition to this collection most of the pieces in an untitled lute manuscript (D-LEm II614) are signed ‘vieux Gallot’. These two sources comprise almost all his identified music, but a few other pieces by him are among those signed simply ‘Gal-lot’ found in other manuscripts (in F-Pn, B, GB-Ob, HAdolmetsch, A-GÖ, KR, Wn, CZ-Pu and S-K). His compositions include several musical portraits – La Fontange and La Montespan among others – and

❧ 62

tombeaux – among them those in memory of Turenne, Condé and Madame – inspired by members of the court. Visée in turn composed a tombeau in memory of Gallot.

3) Pierre Gallot

(b c1660; d Paris, after 1716). Lutenist and composer, son of (1) Alexandre Gallot. He was known as ‘Gallot le jeune’ and is reputed to have been a remarkable performer. He also taught the lute and guitar to wealthy foreigners. The incomplete tablature of ‘Gallot à Paris’ (CZ-Pu KK83) contains one lute piece by him, and others appear in manuscripts (at F-Pn, B, PL-Lw, US-NY and A-GÖ). His Tombeau de la Princesse de Monaco is in a manuscript in Vienna (A-Wn 17706).

(4) Henry François de Gallot, Sieur de Franlieu

(d after 1684). Guitarist and lutenist. His relationship to the other Gallots is uncertain. He was known as ‘Gallot d'Irlande’. In Nantes between 1664 and 1684 he compiled a manuscript (GB-Ob M.Sch.C94) entitled Pièces de guittarre de differends autheurs, containing music by ‘Gallot le vieux’, ‘Gallot d’Angleterre’ (possibly his son, who may have served Charles II), ‘Gallot le jeune’ and ‘Gal-lot le cadet’, as well as Francisque, Dufaut, Corbetta and other composers. An Antoine Gallot (d Vilnius, 1647), also a lutenist and composer, is not thought to be related to the other members of the Gallot family. He was employed at the Polish court, where he served King Władisław IV, and a vocal canon by hiim servives in Marco Scacchi’s Cribrum musicum (Venice, 1643).BIBLIOGRAPHYL. de La Laurencie: Les luthistes (Paris, 1928)A. Tessier: ‘Quelques sources de l’école française de luth du XVIIe siècle’, IMSCR I: Liège 1930, 217–24M. Rollin: ‘Le “tombeau” chez les luthistes Denis Gautier, Jacques Gallot, Charles Mouton’, XVIIe siècle, nos.21–2 (1954), 463–79M. Rollin: ‘La suite pour luth dans l'oeuvre de Charles Mouton’, ReM, no.226 (1955), 76–88H. Radke: ‘Bemerkungen zur Lautenisten-Familie Gallot’, Mf, xiii (1960), 51–5D. Gill: ‘The de Gallot Guitar Books’, EMc, vi (1978), 79–87R.T. Pinnell: ‘The Theorboed Guitar: its Repertoire in the Guitar Books of Granata and Gallot’, EMc, vii (1979), 323–9C. Massip: ‘Recherches biographiques’, Preface to Oeuvres de Gallot (Paris, 1987), xv–xxiiiM. Rollin: ‘La musique pour le luth des Gallot’, Preface to Oeuvres de Gallot (Paris, 1987), xxix–xliii

Mouton, Charles

(b Paris 1617; d before 1699). French lutenist and composer. His mother’s family included musi-cians, one of whom had a career at court. By the mid-1640s Mouton was being lionized by Parisi-an literary society, to which he may have been introduced by the Gaultiers. Around 1664 he was still in Paris, teaching a number of well-placed pupils. In 1673 he directed the lutes and theorbos in an entertainment at the court of Savoy in Turin. From at least 1680 he was back in Paris, where he published his two surviving books of Pièces de luth sur différents modes (Paris, before 1679, c1680; ed. in Corpus des luthistes français, Paris, 1992), and where his pupils included Milleran and Le Sage de Richée. The famous portrait by François de Troy (in the Louvre) was painted in 1690.

63

Mouton represents, with Jacques Gallot, the final flowering of the French lute school. His first book contains an important Avertissement on the performance of his pieces.

BIBLIOGRAPHYM. Rollin: ‘La suite pour luth dans l’oeuvre de Charles Mouton’, ReM, no.226 (1955), 76–88F. Lesure: Introduction to C. Mouton: Pièces de luth sur différents modes (Geneva, 1978), vii–xii [in Fr. and Eng.]K. Sparr: ‘French Lutenists and French Lute-Music in Sweden’, Le Luth et sa musique II, ed. J.-M. Vac-caro (Paris, 1984), 59–67C. Goldberg: Stilisierung als kunstvermittelnder Prozess: die französischen Tombeau-Stücke im 17. Jahrhun-dert (Laaber, 1987)P. Vendrix: ‘Le tombeau en musique en France à l’époque baroque’, RMFC, xxv (1987), 105–38F.-P. Goy and C. Meyer: Sources manuscrites en tablature (Baden-Baden, 1991–)

Falckenhagen [Falkenhagen], Adam

(b Grossdalzig, nr Leipzig, 26 April 1697; d Bayreuth, 6 Oct 1754). German lutenist. He was the son of Johann Christian Falckenhagen, a schoolmaster. When he was ten he went to live for eight years with his uncle Johann Gottlob Erlmann, a pastor in Knauthain near Leipzig. There he underwent training ‘in literis et musicis’, particularly the harpsichord and, later, the lute. He then perfected his lute playing with Johann Jacob Graf in Merseburg, where in 1715 he is mentioned as a footman and musician in the service of the young Count Carl Heinrich von Dieskau. In the winter term of 1719 he entered Leipzig University; a year later he went to Weissenfels, where he remained for se-ven years as a lute teacher. From about 1724 he was also employed as a chamber musician and lu-tenist at the court of Duke Christian, where his presence is documented for 1726, together with that of his wife, the singer Johanna Aemilia. During this time he undertook various tours and en-joyed several months’ instruction from the famous lutenist Silvius Leopold Weiss in Dresden. After two years in Jena, he was in the service of Duke Ernst August of Saxony-Weimar from May 1729 to 15 August 1732. By 1734 he was employed at the Bayreuth court. In 1736 Margrave Friedrich appointed him ‘Virtuosissimo on the Lute and Chamber Musician Second to the Kapellmeister Johann Pfeiffer’. About 1746 he referred to himself as ‘Cammer-Secretarius Registrator’ of Bran-denburg-Culmbach.

Falckenhagen was one of the last important lute composers. Although some of his works are root-ed in the Baroque tradition like those of his teacher, Weiss, they show a progressive tendency to-wards the galant style. His keyboard-influenced lute writing is freely contrapuntal and usually limi-ted to two voices. His output ranges from modest pieces suitable for amateurs to others (e.g. the Sonata op.1 no.5 and the concertos) of much greater difficulty, exploiting virtuoso techniques. His Preludio nel quale sono contenuti tutti i tuoni musicali, lasting over 20 minutes in performance, contains labelled sections in the 24 major and minor keys. There may be a more direct connection with J.S. Bach in the strong possibility that the tablature version of the G minor Suite bwv995 (D-LEm III.II.3) was arranged by Falckenhagen himself (see Schulze, 1983). The ornament signs and other technical signs are the same as those used exclusively by Falckenhagen in his printed works and found in a manuscript table of signs associated with his Bayreuth period (D-Ngm M274).

BIBLIOGRAPHYGerberLGöhlerV

❧ 64

NDB (K. Dorfmüller)WaltherMLH.-J. Schulze: ‘Wer intavolierte Johann Sebastian Bachs Lauten-kompositionen?’, Mf, xix (1966), 36–48H. Küffner: ‘Eine Augsburger Sammelhandschrift als Quelle zur Geschichte der Bayreuther Hof-musik’, Archiv für Geschichte von Oberfranken, xlix (Bayreuth, 1969), 103–96J. Doming: ‘Der Lautenist Adam Falckenhagen’, Laute und Guitarre, v (1983), 322–8H.-J.Schulze: ‘“Monsieur Schouster” – ein vergessener Zeitgenosse Johann Sebastian Bachs’, Bachi-ana et alia musicologica: Festschrift Alfred Dürr, ed. W. Rehm (Kassel, 1983), 243–50

Kapsperger, Giovanni Girolamo [Giovanni Geronimo]; Kapsberger, Johann Hieronymus; [‘Il Tedesco della tiorba’]

(b ?Venice, c1580; d Rome, Jan 1651). Italian composer, lutenist, theorbist and guitarist of German descent. (He seems to have used the spelling ‘Kapsperger’ rather than the ‘Kapsberger’ favoured by German scholars.) His father, Colonel Guglielmo Kapsperger, was a noble military official with the Imperial House of Austria and may have settled in Venice. Kapsperger was in Rome soon after 1605, where through his reputation as a virtuoso and his status as a nobile alemano he moved in the circles of powerful families such as the Bentivoglio and the Barberini. Other supporters in Rome included the Orders of S Stefano and S Giovanni and the academies of the Umoristi and the Im-perfetti whose members arranged for the publication of his works; the academies Kapsperger or-ganized in his house were described as among the ‘wonders of Rome’. Around 1609 he married the Neapolitan Gerolima di Rossi, by whom he had at least three children. In 1612 his Maggio Cantata, dedicated to the Grand duchess Maria Maddalena, was performed in Florence at the Palazzo Pitti.

In 1622 his Apotheosis, on Jesuit themes, was performed at the Collegio Romano on the canoniza-tions of the first two Jesuit saints, Ignatius Loyola and Francis Xavier; the most elaborate musical production in Rome before the Barberini operas, it marked the period of Kapsperger's deepening relationship with the papal circle. In 1624 his settings of verses by the newly-elected Pope Urban VIII Barberini were published as Poematia et carmina, which G.B. Doni forwarded enthusiastically to Mersenne. In the same year Kapsperger entered the service of Urban's nephew, Cardinal Francesco Barberini, where for 30 years he worked alongside Frescobaldi, Luigi Rossi, Domenico Mazzocchi, Stefano Landi and Doni, and collaborated with the poets Ottavio Tronsarelli, Giovanni Ciampoli and Giulio Rospigliosi (the future Pope Clement IX). His son Filippo Bonifacio also joined Francesco's household. Doni wrote that Kapsperger's music was often sung ‘in the chamber of His Holiness’ and in 1626 and 1627 his masses were performed in the Cappella Sistina at Ur-ban's request. Later, Doni denounced Kapsperger for attempting to replace Palestrina's music with his own at the Sistine Chapel, an allegation uncritically accepted by Hawkins and Ambros (and effectively contaminating Kapsperger's later reputation); Baini, however, remained sceptical of Doni's story and no such incident is documented, although other contemporary accounts describe him as an extraordinary talent but opportunistic, unco-operative and vainglorious. Kapsperger continued as a salaried member of Francesco's household until the death of Urban in 1644 and the dissolution of Francesco's establishment in 1646. Curiously, only two of his works were printed after 1633, when Allacci published an inventory of Kapsperger's music that included the titles of many additional collections that he was preparing for publication. Kapsperger died in 1651 and was buried in the church of St Blaise outside Rome.

65

Kapsperger was a prolific, highly original and often extraordinary composer and was seminal in the development of the theorbo as a solo instrument. The theorbo collections contain virtuoso toccatas, variations and dances (some for a 19-course instrument) that combine arpeggiated sec-tions, unusual rhythmic groupings, broken-style figuration and slurred passages within an orna-mented and highly syncopated context that has many parallels with the keyboard works of Fres-cobaldi. The 1640 book also contains an important preface regarding performance. The 1611 lute book includes eight toccatas – described by Gilbert as ‘possibly the finest set of its kind in the Ita-lian repertoire’ – that employ more fluid textures proceeding almost spontaneously from suspen-ded harmonies over long pedals to recitative-style passages, motivic sequences, short ricercare sec-tions and dramatic bursts of scales. Among his other instrumental works are one of the few collec-tions of instrumental ensemble dances of this period (1615) and the more canzona-like Sinfonie a quattro of the same year, which feature solo-tutti contrasts, echo effects and multiple continuo parts.

In his vocal music, Kapsperger explored the limits of both Baroque opulence and Counter-Refor-mation austerity. The Mottetti passeggiati and Arie passeggiate contain monodies (1612) and duets (1623) with extensive (and sometimes exaggerated) written-out ornamentation. The larger Pe-trarch and Guarini settings stand out among the 1612 Arie (which are actually solo madrigals); the 1623 collection is less ornate, but more satisfying musically. The Mottetti suffer from lengthy and predictable florid passages but reflect aspects of current Roman taste and were influential in Ger-many. The Thomaskirche Kantor Tobias Michael acknowledged in his Musicalischer Seelen-Lust (1637) that ‘the art of Herr Kapsberger is very attractive to me, and I have followed him as much as I was able’. The madrigals of 1609 rely mainly on homorhythmic textures and reveal Kapsper-ger's awareness of current literary trends through his setting of Marino. But Kapsperger's most engaging and popular secular works (as testified by concordant versions) are found among his se-ven books of villanellas, which use simple poetry, set mostly syllabically in contrasting sections of duple and triple metre, often with attractive dance rhythms.

In the finely crafted Poematia et carmina (1624), Kapsperger's intense setting of Urban VIII's poetry was lauded by Doni for its absence of affectations and its ‘pure and simple’ melody. Similarly, the lavishly staged Apotheosis (1622) sets a monological Latin text to a remarkably restrained declama-tory style, occasionally relieved by triple-time choruses. This stylistic template is maintained in the Christmas cantata I pastori di Bettelemme and the Litaniae Deiparae Virginis. The three Missae Urbanae, dedicated to Urban VIII, and the Cantiones sacrae (1628) feature homorhythmic textures as well, and in the case of the masses polychoral technique. Similar to the 1612 passeggiate collections but displaying greater sensitivity to textual-musical relationships are the motets of Modulatus sacri di-minutis (1630) which employ lavish embellishment and challenging rhythmic figures (e.g. ‘Beata Dei genitrix’). Kapsperger's stage works, which include La vittoria del principe Vladislao in Valacchia (1625), an opera about the Polish-Turkish war of 1621, are all lost, apart from the Apotheosis.

In a time of intense musical polemics, Kapsperger was praised by moderns and conservatives, from the art collector Vincenzo Giustiniani and the world-traveller Pietro della Valle, to the neo-classic theorist G.B. Doni and the Jesuit polymath Athanasius Kircher, who annointed him as the successor to Monteverdi. The collective applause offered from individuals of such diverse back-grounds testifies to the wide stylistic breadth and uncommon invention of a composer whose works are representative of early 17th-century Roman music.

BIBLIOGRAPHYAmbrosGM, ivGrove6 (W. Witzenmann)

❧ 66

GroveO (V. Coelho)L. Allacci: Apes urbanae, sive De viris illustribus (Rome, 1633), 159–60G.B. Doni: De praestantia musicae veteris libri tres (Florence, 1647/R), 4, 32G. Baini: Memorie storico-critiche della vita e delle opere di Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina (Rome, 1828/R), 353–9P. Kast: ‘Biographische Notizen über Johann Hieronymus Kapsberger aus den Vorreden zu seinen Werken’, Quellen und Forschungen aus italienischen Archiven und Bibliotheken, xl (1960), 200–11P. Kast: ‘Biographische Notizen zu römischen Musikern des 17. Jahrhunderts’, AnMc, no.1 (1963), 38–69, esp.47–8P. Kast: ‘Tracce monteverdiane e influssi romani nella musica sacra del Kapsberger’, RIM, ii (1967), 287–93O. Wessely: ‘Der Indice der Firma Franzini in Rom: Versuch einer Rekonstruktion’, Beiträge zur Mu-sikdokumentation: Franz Grasberger zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. G. Brosche (Tutzing, 1975), 439–92J. Forbes: The Non-Liturgical Vocal Music of Johannes Hieronymous Kapsberger (diss., U. of North Caroli-na, Chapel Hill, 1977)V. Coelho: ‘Frescobaldi and the Lute and Chitarrone Toccatas of “Il Tedesco della tiorba’”, Fresco-baldi Studies: Madison, WI, 1983, 137–56V. Coelho: ‘G.G. Kapsberger in Rome, 1604–1645: New Biographical Data’, JLSA, xvi (1983), 103–133V. Coelho: “Giovanni Girolamo Kapsberger ‘della tiorba’ e l'influenza liutistica sulle Toccate di Fres-cobaldi”, Girolamo Frescobaldi: Ferrara 1983, 341–57O.C. Henriksen: ‘Libro Primo di Sinfonie … del Signor Giovanni Girolamo Kapsperger: the Music and Appli-cation Possibilities of Lute Family Instruments (thesis, Schola Cantorum Basiliensis, Basle, 1985)A. and Z. Szweykowski: ‘Un'opera ignota di G.G. Kapsperger in onore del Principe Vladislao Waza’, Studi in onore di Giuseppe Vecchi, ed. I. Cavallini (Modena, 1989), 221–32F. Hammond: Music and Spectacle in Baroque Rome: Barberini Patronage under Urban VIII (New Haven, 1994)E. Sala and F. Marincola: ‘La musica nei drammi Geuisitici: il caso dell' Apotheosis sive Consecratio Sanctorum Ignatii et Francisci Xaverii (1622)’, I Gesuiti e i primordi del teatro barocco in Europa, ed. M. Chi-abò and F. Doglio (Viterbo, 1995), 389–440V. Coelho: ‘Kapsberger's Apotheosis … of Francis Xavier (1622) and the Conquering of India’, The Work of Opera: Genre, Nationhood, and Sexual Difference, ed. R. Dellamora and D. Fischlin (New York, 1997), 27–47Z.M. Szweykowski: ‘Kapsperger: Successor to Monteverdi?’, Claudio Monteverdi und die Folgen, ed. L. Silke and J. Steinheuer (Kassel, 1998), 311–25

Galilei, Michelagnolo [Michelangelo]

(b Florence, 18 Dec 1575; d Florence, 3 Jan 1631). Italian lutenist and composer, son of vincenzo Galilei. His father destined him for a musical career at an early age. The young Michelagnolo wro-te the dedicatory epistle of Vincenzo's Contrapunti a due voci (1584). He went to Poland, probably in the service of the Radziwiłł family in 1593 and remained until 1606, having applied unsuccessfully in 1599 for a post at Archduke Ferdinando de’ Medici’s court in Florence. In 1607 he was appoin-ted to the Hofkapelle of Duke Maximilian I in Munich, where he spent the rest of his life. His last years were clouded by his disastrous relationship with his brother Galileo as well as by the

67

misconduct of his eldest son Vincenzo (b 1608), a talented lutenist. Of his eight children, Alberto Cesare (b 1617) and Cosimo (b 1621) also followed their father’s example.

Galilei’s music, sought after even before his departure for Poland, was first published in the antho-logies of Fuhrmann, Mertel, Besard and Mylius; its circulation seems to have been limited to Southern German countries. Almost all his compositions appear in his first and only book for ten-course lute, engraved in French tablature. Galliards, correntes and voltas, generally provided with varied repeats, are grouped by modes into 10 ‘suites’ each preceded by a toccata; two passamezzos with saltarellos complete the collection. Galilei’s works, in which tradition is wedded to modernity (especially of dissonance treatment), express their author’s elegance of invention, cosmopolitanism of style and eminently poetic nature.

BIBLIOGRAPHYK. Trautmann: ‘Die Familie Galilei in München’, Jb für Münchener Geschichte, iii (1889), 553–4A. Favaro, ed.: Le opere di Galileo Galilei (Florence, 1929–39), x–xixA. Einstein: ‘Vincenzo Galilei and the Instructive Duo’, ML, xviii (1937), 360–68D.A. Smith: Introduction to facs. of M. Galilei: Il primo libro d’intavolatura di liuto (Munich, 1981)C. Chauvel: Introduction to facs. of M. Galilei: Il primo libro d’intavolatura di liuto (Geneva, 1988) [incl. list of sources]

Piccinini, Alessandro

(b Bologna, 30 Dec 1566; d probably at Bologna, c1638). Italian lutenist, composer and writer on music. His father, Leonardo Maria Piccinini, his brothers Girolamo and Filippo (see below) and his son Leonardo Maria were all lutenists too. Duke Guglielmo Gonzaga summoned him to his court at Mantua in 1582, but, because of commitments that his Father had entered into, he went instead with his family to the Este court at Ferrara, where he and his brothers remained until the death of Duke Alfonso II on 27 October 1597. He then entered the service of Cardinal Pietro Al-dobrandini, papal legate at Bologna and Ferrara, who died in 1621. He was a member of the Acca-demia dei Filomusi, Bologna. Three autograph letters from him survive (in I-MOs), one of 31 Janu-ary 1595 to the Duke of Ferrara and two, of 2 June 1622 and 1 January 1623, to the Duke of Mo-dena.

Piccinini published two volumes, Intavolatura di liuto, et di chitarrone, libro primo, nel quale si contengano dell’uno, & dell’altro stromento arie, baletti, correnti, gagliarde, canzoni, & ricercate musicali, & altre à dui, e trè liuti concertati insieme; et una inscrittione d’avertimenti, che insegna la maniera, & il modo di ben sonare con facilità i sudetti stromenti (Bologna, 1623: facs and edn. in AntMI, Monumenta bononiensis, ii, 1962) and Intavolatura di liuto, nel quale si contengono toccate, ricercate musicali, corrente, gagliarde, chiaccone, e passacagli alla vera spagnola, un bergamasco, con varie partite, una battaglia, & altri capricci (Bologna, 1639), which was seen through the press after his death by his son. The first of these volumes has a particularly important preface in which he described a type of archlute that he claimed to have developed and had made in Padua in 1594. While these claims have aroused scholarly controversy (see in particular Kinsky, and MGG1), Piccinini’s claim to have invented the archlute – the first ex-tended-neck lute – in the 1590s is plausible, although the extended-neck chitarrone (as a restrung and retuned bass lute) predated his invention. Piccinini also made significant modifications to the chitarrone and according to Giustiniani invented an instrument ‘similar to the kithara of Apollo’, which he called a pandora and which was perhaps akin to the English poliphant (see Bandora). His preface also includes a short but detailed manual on performance, which advances several interes-

❧ 68

ting ideas: in imitative writing the theme must be played louder so that it stands out; a technique of playing forte and piano (‘ondeggiato’) should be adopted in pieces rich in dissonances, which should be highlighted (as, according to him, they were at Naples); embellishments should be left to the taste of the player, but the cadential gruppo should always be pronounced, its notes being given equal value, and it should be completed as quickly as possible. Piccinini was a talented composer. His toccatas, which are very varied in form and style, are specially rewarding. The dances have at-tractive melodies and varied, piquant rhythms; some of them are arranged in suites. Piccinini wro-te the music (apparently lost) to La selva sin amore (libretto by Lope de Vega Carpio), the first opera performed om Spain.

After working with him at the Ferrara court, Piccinini’s brothers both went abroad: Girolamo (b Bologna; d Flanders, 1615) entered the service of Cardinal Guido Bentivoglio and accompanied him when he was appointed papal nuncio in Flanders, and Filippo (b Bologna; d Bologna, 1648) worked at the Spanish court until about 1645, when he returned to Bologna; a two-part madrigal by Filippo survives (RISM 161017).

See also Archlute; Chitarrone; Lute, §§5, 6

BIBLIOGRAPHYMGG1 (O. Mischiati, L.F. Tagliarini)A. Banchieri: Discorso di Camillo Scaliggeri della Fratta (Bologna, 1626), 107fV. Giustiniani: Discorso sopra la musica de’ suoi tempi (MS, 1628, I-La); pr. in A. Solerti: Le origini del melodramma (Turin, 1903/R), 111, 124; Eng. trans., MSD, ix (1962), 63–80A. Masini: Bologna perlustrata (Bologna, 1650/R), 687P. Canal: Della musica in Mantova (Venice, 1881/R), 37, 71L.F. Valdrighi: Nomocheliurgografía antica e moderna (Modena, 1884/R), 174, 272L. Frati: ‘Liutisti e liutai a Bologna’, RMI, xxvi (1919), 94–111G. Kinsky: ‘Alessandro Piccinini und sein Arciliuto’, AcM, x (1938), 103–18F. Vatielli: ‘L’ultimo liutista’, RMI, xlii (1938), 469–91N. Fortune: ‘Giustiniani on Instruments’, GSJ, v (1952), 48L. de Grandis: ‘Famiglie di musicisti del ’500. I Piccinini: vita col Liuto’, NRMI, xvi (1982), 226–32O. Cristoforetti: ‘Les Piccinini et l'évolution organologique du luth à la fin du XVIe siècle’, Musique Ancienne, no.19 (1985), 4–20J. Dugot and M. Horvat, eds.: ‘Piccinini: Avertimenti, 1623: Les “Avertimenti”, ou instructions pré-cédent l'Intavolatura de liuto et di chitarrone, libro primo’, Musique Ancienne, no.19 (1985), 21–39

Reusner [Reussner], Esaias (ii)

(b Löwenberg, Silesia [now Lwówek Šląski, Poland], 29 April 1636; d Cölln, Berlin, 1 May 1679). German composer and lutenist, son of esaias Reusner (i). He was taught the lute by his father and became a child prodigy. About 1645, after the death of his mother, the family moved to Breslau, where at about the age of 12 he entered the service of the Swedish general Count Wittenberg as a page. He spent the next year in the household of the royal war commissioner, Müller. In 1651 he was employed in Poland as a valet at the court of Princess Radziwiłł, where he became a pupil of

69

an unidentified French lutenist. He returned to Breslau in 1654 and in the following year became lutenist to Georg III, Duke of Silesia, an appointment he retained until 1672. He then moved to Leipzig, where he taught the lute for a year at the university. From 5 February 1674 until his death he was a chamber musician at the court of the Elector Friedrich Wilhelm of Brandenburg in Ber-lin. His two collections of suites for the lute, Delitiae testudinis and Neue Lauten-früchte, are important as showing the first application of French lute style by a German composer and also as early do-cuments in the development of the instrumental suite. They contain a total of 28 suites, varying in number of movements from four to nine. Each suite is unified by a major or minor tonality. They all include the basic structure of later dance suites, allemande–courante–sarabande–gigue. Most of the longer suites begin with another dance, such as a paduana or ballo, or the characteristically French improvisatory prelude, and many conclude with a dance other than the gigue. Reusner’s influence was widely felt in Germany in the 17th century, and the style of his music established a precedent evident in the works of subsequent lutenists such as Silvius Weiss.

BIBLIOGRAPHYG. Sparmann: Esaias Reusner und die Lauten-Suite (diss., Freie U. of Berlin, 1926)F. Blume: Introduction to E. Reusner: Sämtliche Suiten für die Laute, i: Suite 1 bis 5 aus den ‘Neuen Lauten-früchten (1676)’, ed. W. Gerwig (Wolfenbüttel and Berlin, 1928)K. Koletschka: ‘Esaias Reussner der Jüngerer und seine Bedeutung für die deutsche Lautenmusik des XVII. Jahrhunderts’, SMw, xv (1928), 3–45K. Koletschka: ‘Esaias Reussner Vater und Sohn und ihre Choralbearbeitungen für die Laute: eine Parallele’, Festschrift Adolph Koczirz, ed. R. Haar and J. Zuth (Vienna, 1930), 14–17

Le Sage de Richée, Philipp Franz

(fl c1695). German lutenist and composer of French birth. In early sources he is stated to have been a pupil of Charles Mouton. In 1695 he seems to have been in the service of Baron von Neid-hardt in Breslau. He was an aristocrat and must have travelled in a number of countries, gaining a broad knowledge of the lute repertory in Bohemia, Austria and France. One publication of his has survived, Cabinet der Lauten, in welchem zu finden 12 neue Partien, aus unterschiedenen Tonen und neuesten Manier so aniezo gebräuchlich’ (n.p., n.d.; it must have appeared in Breslau and the copy formerly in Riemann’s possession bore the date 1695). It contains 98 pieces engraved in French lute tablature and arranged in 12 suites. The preface mentions Dufaut, Mouton, Losy and Gaultier (though which one is unspecified). The following types of piece occur: praeludium, allemande, courante, sarabande, gigue, gavotte, minuet, bourrée, chaconne, passacaglia, ouverture and rondeau (with echo). One piece is attributed to ‘Graf Logi’ [Losy]; presumably Le Sage de Richée composed all the others himself. Surprisingly, he is seldom mentioned in manuscripts, but the sumptuous ap-pearance of his volume bears witness to the outstanding esteem in which he was held.

BIBLIOGRAPHYT. Wortmann: Philipp Franz Le Sage de Richée und sein Cabinet der Lauten (diss., U. of Vienna, 1919)W. Boetticher: Studien zur solistischen Lautenpraxis des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts (Berlin, 1943), 169ffE. Pohlmann: Laute, Theorbe, Chitarrone (Bremen, 1968, rev., enlarged 5/1982)E. Vogl: ‘Loutnová hudba v Čechách’ [Lute music in Bohemia], Časopis národního musea, cxxxiii (1964), 11–20 [incl. Ger. summary]

❧ 70

Losy, Jan Antonín, Count of Losinthal [Logi, Loschi, Losymthal]

(b Štekeň Castle, near Strakonice, c1650; d Prague, 9 Aug – 2 Sept 1721). Bohemian lutenist and composer. He was born into a wealthy family of Swiss origin; his father had settled in Prague in the 1620s and was raised to the Bohemian nobility for his bravery during the defence of the city against the Swedes in 1648. Losy studied at Prague University from 1661, taking the doctorate in philosophy in 1668. After this he probably undertook the customary European tour; he is known to have visited Italy, and he probably went to France and the Low Countries as well. He had a great enthusiasm for French music, especially that of Lully, and also for the music of Fux. He played the lute and violin in concerts at his palace in Prague. At the height of his fame (1696–7) he travelled in the German lands and engaged in a friendly musical competition in Leipzig with Pantaleon Hebenstreit and the Thomaskantor Johann Kuhnau, who subsequently dedicated to Losy his Fri-sche Clavier Früchte (1696). Losy's son Adam Philipp (1705–81), who lived in Vienna and became music director to the imperial court, was a competent double bass player in aristocratic orchestras.

Losy was the best-known and most respected lutenist in late 17th-century Prague, but his reputa-tion extended far outside his own land. He was praised by Ernst Gottlieb Baron (Historisch-theoreti-sche und practische Untersuchung des Instruments der Lauten, 1727) and one of his courantes was prin-ted in Le Sage de Richée's Cabinet der Lauten (1695). Silvius Leopold Weiss wrote a highly expressi-ve tombeau in his honour. The real measure of his popularity is seen in the number and wide dis-tribution of manuscripts containing his compositions, which also exist in arrangements for man-dore, angélique and keyboard. Several manuscripts of compositions by him for guitar are probably also arrangements. Losy adopted the traditional French style and genres, but he somewhat mode-rated the characteristic brisé texture of Parisian lute music in favour of more distinct melody and bass lines, probably influenced by contemporary Austrian composers. Vogl identified 100 or so individual pieces, to which about 50 more may be added (see Crawford), although attributions are rarely entirely reliable. A few pieces are grouped into suites or partitas, but Losy's intentions in this regard remain unclear. About 60 pieces survive only in guitar tablature, most of which may be ar-rangements of lute originals.

BIBLIOGRAPHYA. Koczirz: ‘Österreichische Lautenmusik zwischen 1650 und 1720’, SMw, v (1918), 74–85, 88–93J. Pohanka: ‘ Loutnová tabulatura z rajhradského kláštera’ [Lute tabulatures from the Rajhrad mo-nastery], Časopis Moravského Musea, xl (1955), 193–203E. Vogl: ‘Zur Biographie Losys’, Mf, xiv (1961), 189–192E. Vogl: ‘Johann Anton Losy: Lutenist of Prague’, JLSA, xiii (1980), 58–86E. Vogl: ‘The Lute Music of Johann Anton Losy’, JLSA, xiv (1981), 5–58T. Crawford: ‘ New Sources of the Music of Count Losy’, JLSA, xv (1982), 52–83

Bittner [Bithner, Büttner], Jacob [Jacques]

(fl 1680). Austro-Bohemian lutenist and composer. The few lines devoted to him in Baron's Unter-suchung (1727) are misleading as regards his publications. His Pieces de lut (1682), engraved by G. de Groos, then residing in Prague, and with a title-page by Karel Skreta, contains 53 technically de-manding pieces for 11-course lute. The collection is dedicated to Johann Peter Pedroni, a wealthy citizen and tradesman in Prague. The pieces are grouped into ten suites, generally following the allemande–courante–sarabande–gigue pattern, each (except the second) preceded by a prélude non mesuré. French influence is evident, for example in the ornamentation, but the cantabile style of the

71

music, praised by Baron, reveals the aesthetic approach of the Germanic school initiated by Esaias Reusner (ii).

BIBLIOGRAPHYE.G. Baron: Historisch-theoretisch und practische Untersuchung des Instruments der Lauten (Nuremberg, 1727/R), 73R.G. Kiesewetter: ‘Die Tabulaturen der älteren Practiker seit der Einführung des Figural- und Mensuralgesanges und des Contrapunctes, aus des Gesichtspuncte der Kungstgesichte betrachtet’, AMZ, xxxiii (1831), suppl.8W.J. Rave: A Baroque Lute Tablature: Jacob Bittner ‘Pieces de Lut’, 1682 (diss., U. of Illinois, 1965)

Dufaut [Du Faut, Du Fault, Dufau], François

(b Bourges, before 1604; d ?London, before 1672). French lutenist and composer. According to Ti-ton du Tillet he was a pupil of the Gaultiers. He was one of the most renowned lutenists of the 17th century. René Milleran (in his collection of lute music, c1690, F-Pn Rés.823) mentioned him as one of the finest players of his day, ranking him with the Gaultiers, Gallots and Mouton. Nor was this opinion confined to France, for in Germany both Baron and Le Sage de Richée (in his Ca-binet der Lauten, 1695) referred to him as a model, while in England Mary Burwell's teacher praised his ‘very grave and learned’ playing. These tributes are confirmed by the large number of his com-positions in over 90 lute manuscripts in France, England and the German lands.

Born into a well-to-do middle-class family in Bourges, he was established in Paris by 1629, when he was described as bourgeois de Paris at his marriage to Marie Mongin, witnessed by his friend the distinguished lute maker Edmond Hotman. Although he apparently never held a court appoint-ment, his outstanding ability was recognized in 1631 by the inclusion of 13 of his pieces in the Ta-blature de Luth de differens autheurs (published in Paris by the royal music printer Pierre Ballard) be-side compositions by senior members of the court music such as Robert Ballard and Mesangeau. He was again included in the Tablature of 1638 (10 pieces). Various Parisian documents mention him up to 1642, the date of his second marriage, to Marie Hotman, perhaps the sister of Edmond. Probably after 1652, the presumable date of his tombeau for the wealthy lutenist Blancrocher who died that year, Dufaut moved to England, where the Civil War (1642–9) had caused French musi-cians at the English court to return to France, but where there was still a demand for French mu-sic. Of his patrons there we know only of Elizabeth Warwick, whom he taught, and whom Christi-aan Huygens, visiting London in 1663, heard play ‘excellent goet’ with her teacher. In 1671 Con-stantijn Huygens referred to Dufaut in the past tense.

In his music Dufaut used the new tunings introduced into French solo lute music in the 1620s and 30s, including the D minor tuning, which became standard from the 1640s. Of around 165 pieces attributed to him (ed. A. Souris and M. Rollin, Paris, 1965, 2/1988; further source information in Goy, Meyer and Rollin) the great majority are in the usual genres of the solo instrumental suite: prélude non mesuré (of which the Recherche in the 1631 Tablature is one of the earliest fully develo-ped examples), allemande, courante, sarabande and gigue. Few have the subtitles that later became common in this repertory. While there is wit and charm in the lighter pieces, his most impressive works are the weightier allemandes and pavanes. These have a rich chordal sonority, an unusual consistency of part-writing, and a sophisticated contrapuntal craftsmanship which probably ac-counts for his appeal, particularly in the German area. Dufaut was a strong influence on Esajus Reusner and the German lute school generally, and his works continued to be played in Germany up to the middle of the 18th century.

❧ 72

BIBLIOGRAPHYE.G. Baron: Historisch-theoretische und practische Untersuchung des Instruments der Lauten (Nuremberg, 1727/R; Eng. trans., 1976, as Study of the Lute)E. Titon du Tillet: Le Parnasse françois (Paris, 1732/R)W.J.A. Jonckbloet and J.P.N. Land, eds.: Correspondance et oeuvres musicales de Constantin Huygens (Leiden, 1882)L. de La Laurencie: Les luthistes (Paris, 1928)T. Dart: ‘Miss Mary Burwell's Instruction Book for the Lute’, GSJ, xi (1958), 3–62W.J. Rave: Some Manuscripts of French Lute Music 1630–1700 (diss., U. of Illinois, 1972)D. Ledbetter: Harpsichord and Lute Music in Seventeenth-Century France (diss., U. of Oxford, 1985)C. Goldberg: Stilisierung als kunstvermittelnder Prozess: Die französischen Tombeau-Stücke im 17. Jahrhun-dert (Laaber, 1987)T. Crawford: Review of Oeuvres de Dufaut, EMc, xviii (1989), 263–5F.P. Goy, C. Meyer and M. Rollin, eds.: Sources manuscrites en tablature (Baden-Baden, 1991–) [cata-logue]

Baron, Ernst Gottlieb [Theofil]

(b Breslau, 17 Feb 1696; d Berlin, 12 April 1760). German lutenist, composer and writer on music. Neither Baron’s life nor his works have as yet been fully explored by scholars. His father Michael was a maker of gold lace and expected his son to follow in his footsteps. The younger Baron sho-wed an inclination towards music in his youth, however, and later made it his profession. He first studied the lute from about 1710 with a Bohemian named Kohott (not to be confused with the later Karl von Kahaut). In Breslau he attended the Elisabeth Gymnasium, and from there went in 1715 to Leipzig, where he studied philosophy and law at the university for four years.

Much of the period from 1719 to 1728 was spent in travels from one small court to another. He first visited Halle for a short period, then in quick succession Cöthen, Schleiz, Saalfeld and Rudol-stadt. He arrived in Jena in 1720 and remained for two years. Thereafter he travelled to Kassel, Fulda, Würzburg, Nuremberg and Regensburg, returning in 1727 to Nuremberg where his Histo-risch-theoretische und practische Untersuchung des Instruments der Lauten, the work for which he is prin-cipally remembered, was published the same year. In 1728 he replaced the lutenist Meusel, who had recently died, at Gotha and held the post for four years. With the death of the Duke of Gotha he moved on to Eisenach. In 1737, after visits to Merseburg, Cöthen and Zerbst, Baron joined the musical ensemble of Crown Prince Frederick of Prussia. He was immediately granted permission to go to Dresden to purchase a theorbo, and there met the highly esteemed lutenists S.L. Weiss and Hofer. When Frederick became king in 1740, Baron continued to serve as theorbist in the much expanded royal musical establishment. He remained at this post until his death.

Baron’s Untersuchung is a valuable though not always reliable source of information about lutenists and lute playing in the late Baroque era, when the instrument was still widely cultivated in solo and ensemble performance in Germany. The work is divided into two main parts. The first deals with the history of the lute, and contains important references to contemporary players. The se-cond is devoted to the practice of the instrument. Baron’s other writings, as yet incompletely stu-died, supplement the Untersuchung, and explore several other subjects.

73

The few accessible examples of Baron’s compositions suggest that he cultivated a characteristic late Baroque idiom in his suites, but moved in the direction of the galant style in his concertos. The lat-ter are in fact trio sonatas in texture, cast in the three-movement form of the concerto.

WRITINGSHistorisch-theoretische und practische Untersuchung des Instruments der Lauten (Nuremberg, 1727/R; Eng. trans., 1976, as Study of the Lute)‘Herrn Barons Fortsetzung seiner in dem Waltherischen Lexico befindlichen Lebensumstände’, in F.W. Marpurg: Historisch-kritische Beyträge zur Aufnahme der Musik, i (Berlin, 1755/R), 544–6‘Herrn Ernst Gottlieb Barons Beytrag zur historisch- theoretisch- und practischen Untersuchung der Laute’, ibid., ii (Berlin, 1756/R), 65–83‘Herrn Barons Abhandlung von dem Notensystem der Laute und der Theorbe’, ibid., 119–23‘Herrn Barons zufällige Gedanken über verschiedene musikalische Materien’, ibid., 124–44Abriss einer Abhandlung von der Melodie: eine Materie der Zeit (Berlin, 1756)Versuch über das Schöne (Altenburg, 1757) [trans. of Y.M. André: Essai sur le beau (1741)]; suppl. Des Herrn Gresset … Rede von dem uralten Adel und Nutzen der Musik im Jahr 1751 gehalten [trans. of Gresset: Discours sur l’harmonie], also pubd separately (Berlin, 1757)

BIBLIOGRAPHYGerberLGerberNLMGG1 (Boetticher)WaltherMLJ. Mattheson: Der neue göttingische, aber viel schlechter, als die alten lacedämonischen urtheilende Ephorus (Hamburg, 1727), 109–27F.W. Marpurg: Legende einiger Musikheiligen (Cologne [recte Breslau], 1786), 158–64A. Koczirz: ‘Verschollene neudeutsche Lautenisten’, AMw, iii (1921), 270–84H. Neemann: ‘Philipp Martin, ein vergessener Lautenist’, ZMw, ix (1926–7), 545–65H.-P. Kosack: Geschichte der Laute und Lautenmusik in Preussen (Kassel, 1935)D.A. Smith: ‘Baron and Weiss contra Mattheson: in Defence of the Lute’, JLSA, vi (1973), 48–62J. Klima: Ernst Gottlieb Baron, 1696–1760: Partiten aus den verschollenen Handschriften Berlin Mus. ms. 40633 und Königsberg 3026: Themenverzeichnis (Enzersdorf, 1976)

Kropfgans [Kropffgans, Kropfganss], Johann

(b Breslau [now Wrocław], 14 Oct 1708; d c1771). German lutenist and composer. He probably re-ceived his earliest lessons from his father, also called Johann (b Neustadt an der Orla, 12 Sept 1668; d after 1731), who had studied with the eminent lutenists Le Sage de Richée and S.L. Weiss and was active as a lutenist and merchant in Breslau. The younger Johann’s brother Johann Gottfried (b Breslau, 17 Dec 1714) was also a lutenist and composer, and it is possible that, with such similar names, biographies of the three musicians have been somewhat confused. Johann’s sister Johanna Eleonora (b Breslau, 5 Nov 1710) also played the lute.

❧ 74

By 1732 Kropfgans had impressed J.G. Walther with his ability to extemporize, play thoroughbass, transpose and compose for his instrument. Soon after 1735 he became, like his father, a pupil of Weiss when he joined the private Kapelle of the Saxon chief minister, Count Heinrich von Brühl. In 1737 he visited Berlin and in summer 1739 joined Weiss and Wilhelm Friedemann Bach to visit J.S. Bach in Leipzig, where, according to the report of a family member, there was ‘extra-special music’ during their four-week stay. After Brühl’s death in 1763 Kropfgans moved to Leipzig, where he was active as a freelance musician and member of J.A. Hiller’s Grosses Concert, performing re-gularly in concerts until 1769. It is said that ‘he displayed on these occasions his fluency in accom-panying recitative on the theorbo and with his instrument was much in demand for all operas and oratorios’.

Kropfgans’s music for his instrument was extensive, to judge from that listed in various Breitkopf catalogues, but only a tiny proportion has survived. The extant solo works are mostly minuets or character pieces in a light, galant style, possibly intended for amateurs. The chamber music is nota-ble for the independence of some of the cello parts. Kropfgans seems also to have made something of a speciality of arranging vocal music for the lute; three of the four sets of Hiller operetta arran-gements listed in Breitkopf ’s catalogues were probably his work.

BIBLIOGRAPHYEitnerQGerberLWaltherMLE.G. Baron: Historisch-theoretische und practische Untersuchung des Instruments der Lauten (Nuremberg, 1727/R; Eng. trans., 1976)J.A. Hiller: Lebensbeschreibung berühmter Musikgelehrten und Tonkünstler neurer Zeit, i (Leipzig, 1784), 70C.J.A. Hoffman: Die Tonkünstler Schlesiens (Breslau, 1830), 269T. Crawford: ‘Haydn’s Music for Lute’, Le luth et sa musique II: Tours 1980, 69–85T. Crawford: ‘Contemporary Lute Arrangements of Hasse’s Vocal and Instrumental Music’, Johann Adolf Hasse und Polen: Warsaw 1993, 73–95

Lauffensteiner, Wolff Jacob

(b Steyr, bap. 28 April 1676; d Munich, 26 March 1754). Austrian lutenist. He was the son of Wolff Jacob Lauffensteiner, towerkeeper in Steyr, and Anna Susanna Werfferin. By 1709 he had settled in Graz as a lutenist. From 1712 he was a valet and lutenist in the service of the Bavarian court, and was in the service of the Bavarian princes during their internment in Graz; he taught them the lute and other instruments. In 1715 he went with the prince's retinue to Munich, entering the pri-vate service of the prince, Duke Ferdinand; as valet he accompanied his master in the field and on his travels. In 1739, on the duke's death, he was granted a pension. For his services to the electoral House of Bavaria Duke Clemens August, Archbishop of Cologne, appointed him chamber coun-sellor (Hofkammerrat).

Lauffensteiner's works include several ensemble concertos in suite or partita form. His music as a whole is highly idiomatic for the lute, in a style uniting traditional French forms, textures and or-naments with a tendency towards italianate cantabile melody over a supporting bass line. In this his pieces, of which over 100 movements survive, come close to those of S.L. Weiss, to whom his

75

music is frequently misattributed in manuscript sources – a measure of its high quality in the es-timation of his contemporaries.

BIBLIOGRAPHYBrookBGerberLE.G. Baron: Historisch-theoretische und practische Untersuchung des Instruments der Lauten (Nuremberg, 1727/R; Eng. trans., 1976)H. Federhofer: ‘Die Grazer Stadtpfarrmatrikeln als musikgeschichtliche Quelle’, Zeitschrift des Histo-rischen Vereines für Steiermark, xlv (1954), 158–68, esp. 163R. Flotzinger: ‘Rochus Berhandtzky und Wolff Jacob Lauffensteiner. Zum Leben und Schaffen zweier Lautenisten in kurbayerischen Diensten’, SMw, xxvii (1966), 200–40

Mace, Thomas

(b ?Cambridge or York, 1612/13; d ?Cambridge, ?1706). English lutenist, singer, composer and wri-ter. He must have been born in either 1612 or 1613 since the title-page of his pamphlet Riddles, Mervels and Rarities, or A New Way of Health, from an Old Man’s Experience (Cambridge, 1698) describes him as ‘being now in the Eighty Six Year of his Age’; branches of the Mace family lived in Cam-bridge and York. As a boy he was probably a chorister. On 10 August 1635 he was appointed a sin-ging-man in the choir of Trinity College, Cambridge. Royalist sympathies no doubt caused him to leave Cambridge during the Civil War; in 1644 he witnessed the siege of York. But he is known to have given singing lessons in Cambridge in May 1647.

He lived through the plague in Cambridge in 1665–6 and afterwards is known to have left there on only two occasions: for a visit to London in 1676 to arrange for the publication of Musick’s Mo-nument and, at the age of 77, presumably in 1690, when he went to London again for four months to sell instruments and music books which his increasing deafness made less useful to him. In the Riddles he still described himself as ‘Healthful, Lively, Active and Brisk’. On 17 April 1706 a ‘sin-ging-man’s’ place was ‘voided by Mr Mace’ at Trinity College: though other Maces were associated with the choir this possibly refers to Thomas following his death.

As well as the Riddles, Mace wrote (in 1675) another non-musical work, a discourse concerning the highways of England called Profit, Conveniency and Pleasure to the Whole Nation. But it is for Musick’s Monument that he principally deserves to be remembered. The quaintness of his English style, with its multiple adjectives and his predilection for expressing himself in execrable verse, has someti-mes caused it to be read for the wrong reasons. It is in fact an important source of information on a wide range of musical activity in England during the second and third quarters of the 17th cen-tury. The book is divided into three sections, on church music, lute music, and viol music and mu-sic in general (see illustration).

Mace was a conservative. He believed that church music had reached perfection early in the centu-ry, and distrusted and disliked the extrovert qualities of the French style that began to find increa-sing favour at the Restoration and to oust more traditional forms of English instrumental music. Musick’s Monument, which he wrote between 1671 and 1675, is in fact a defence of the English tradi-tion and an attempt to recover its values by showing how the decline in the standards of perform-ance of parochial and cathedral music might be reversed.

❧ 76

Mace’s primary aim in the second and longest section of the book is explained in its title, ‘The Lute made Easie’. It is a complete handbook for the instrument, including important information on practical matters such as stringing, fretting and removing the belly, along with a guide for the complete beginner working systematically through the basis of technique. It contains suites in C, F, A minor, D minor, G, E minor and B minor in the French flat tuning, and a supplementary D minor suite in D minor tuning, the so-called New Tuning; because, as Mace said with some sar-casm, ‘I suppose, you may love to be in Fashion’. Throughout his book Mace was at once both old-fashioned and innovatory. He wrote for a 12-course lute, the instrument made popular by Jacques Gaultier in the 1620s and 30s, and the basic style of his pieces is that of the Caroline period. He aimed to draw together the best of this Anglo-French style and updated it by the addition to the suites of such forms as the old galliard and the new Tattle de Moy of his own invention, thereby putting the instrument on a new footing. His suites are unified sets of pieces with more in com-mon than merely key and tuning. Indeed, Mace may well have been the first person to have writ-ten suites for the lute with a prescribed number of movements to be played in a certain order. He stressed that the movements of a suite ‘ought to be something a Kin … or to have some kind of Resemblance in their Conceits, Natures, or Humours’ and should all be in the same key. In a con-cert there should be a smooth transition between the tonalities of successive items, and to this end he provided modulating interludes for the lute.

Mace was one of the few 17th-century musicians who attempted to convey the importance and nature of the affective aspect of his music. In learning a piece the pupil is to consider its ‘fugue’ (generally the opening theme), ‘form’ (the ‘shape of the lesson’) and ‘humour’ (its projected affect). Having decided on the ‘humour’, the principal means available to the player to achieve it are or-namentation, which Mace describes in detail, variation in dynamics and tempo, and the judicious selection of pauses. Mace gives an account of continuo playing on the theorbo, then the primary instrument for the accompaniment of vocal music and also much used in consort music. His the-orbo is a 13-course double-strung instrument with a re-entrant top course (tuning: G', A', B', C, D, E, F, G, c, f, a, d', g), described by James Talbot as an ‘English Theorbo’ and different in many res-pects to continental instruments, but probably the norm in England at this time.

The third section of the book gives a condensed account of viol technique and a small amount of music. He promised more such music for the viol and probably wrote the 15 manuscript pieces to fulfil his pledge. This section also covers music in general and includes much useful information on consort practice in the Caroline and Commonwealth periods, with hints on the use of organ and harpsicord in consort music. Mace had a particular dislike of ‘Squaling-Scoulding-Fiddles’, though he did allow that violins could responsibly be used if balanced by ‘Lusty Full-Sciz’d Theor-boes’. He usefully describes the musical qualities associated with various kinds of instrumental ay-re in his day, their proper speeds and manner of notation.

Mace was of an inventive turn of mind and Musick’s Monument describes a table organ which he developed. Approaching 60 and suffering from increased deafness such that he could not hear his own lute, he constructed the quixotic ‘Dyphone: or Double-Lute, The Lute of Fifty Strings’, a lute and theorbo combined in one instrument that was loud enough for him to hear. His plans for a music room, apparently never constructed, show his interest in acoustic problems as well as an awareness that proper accommodation would have to be found for the type of public concerts which had gradually come into existence during his lifetime. Mace’s tragedy was that by 1676 the lute’s decline in popular esteem was irreversible. Few people probably ever used his book as an in-struction method for the lute and many copies remained unsold in 1690.

77

WRITINGS

only those on or containing music

Musick’s Monument, or A Remembrancer of the Best Practical Musick (London, 1676); facs. with commen-tary and transcr. by J. Jacquot and A. Souris (Paris, 1958/R)

Riddles, Mervels and Rarities, or A New Way of Health, from an Old Man’s Experience (Cambridge, 1698)

BIBLIOGRAPHYBurneyHHawkinsHH. Watson: ‘Thomas Mace: the Man, the Book, and the Instruments’, PMA, xxxv (1908–9), 87–107D. Gill: ‘The Lute and Musick’s Monument’, GSJ, iii (1950), 9–11R.M. Thackeray: ‘Thomas Mace’, MT, xcii (1951), 306–7J. Jacquot: ‘Musick’s Monument de T. Mace et l’évolution du goût musical en Angleterre’, RdM, xxxi (1952), 21–7E.D. Mackerness: ‘Thomas Mace: Additions to a Biography’, MMR, lxxxiii (1953), 43–9E.D. Mackerness: ‘Thomas Mace and the Fact of Reasonableness’, MMR, lxxxv (1955), 211–17, 235–40J. Jacquot: ‘Thomas Mace et la vie musicale de son temps’, Festschrift für Ernst Hermann Meyer, ed. G. Knepler (Leipzig, 1973), 215–22G.G. Butler: ‘The Projection of Affect in Baroque Dance Music’, EMc, xii (1984), 201-07M. Spring: The Lute in England and Scotland after the Golden Age 1620–1750 (diss., U. of Oxford, 1987)M. Spring: ‘Solo Music for Tablature Instruments’, Music in Britain: the Seventeenth Century, ed. I. Spink (Oxford, 1992), 367–405, esp. 396

Gaultier [Gautier, Gaulthier], Denis

(b Paris, 1597 or 1603; d Paris, 1672). French composer and lutenist. To distinguish him from his cousin, ennemond Gaultier, he was often referred to as ‘Gaultier le jeune’; he was also known as ‘Gaultier de Paris’. He was a pupil of Charles Racquet, on whose death he wrote a tombeau. Married in 1635 to Françoise Daucourt, he had one son, Philippe Emmanuel, who became adviser to the king. Unlike Ennemond, he held no official court appointment, despite the high esteem in which he was held by the king and certain of his musicians. He practised his art in the city of Paris and in the salons, including that of Ninon de L’Enclos. Until 1631, when Ennemond left Paris, his ca-reer was so closely linked with his cousin’s that writers of the time refer to them without attemp-ting to distinguish between them. Both had dealings with Blancrocher and L’Enclos and enjoyed a fame at least equal to that of the lutenists Dufaut, Dubut le père, Jacques Gallot and Charles Mouton, who were influenced by them and with whom they were united in expressions of general admiration.

Denis and Ennemond Gaultier are also confused in many French and foreign printed and manu-script collections of lute music; a number of pieces are signed simply with the surname. Moreover, it is sometimes impossible to be certain about the authorship of pieces attributed to ‘Vieux Gaul-tier’, ‘Denis Gaultier’, ‘Gaultier de Paris’ or ‘Gaultier le jeune’ since the same pieces are sometimes ascribed to both in different collections. La rhétorique des dieux and Pièces de luth sur trois différens mo-

❧ 78

des nouveaux, which according to the title-pages consist only of works by Denis Gaultier, include pieces attributed elsewhere to Ennemond. The Livre de tablature, which Denis Gaultier began and which was completed after his death by his pupil Montarcis, does however contain an almost equal number of pieces clearly attributed either to Denis or to Ennemond.

Pièces de luth (c1669) and the Livre de tablature (c1672) both begin with brief instructions on how to play the lute. La rhétorique des dieux (c1652), a sumptuous manuscript compiled under the patrona-ge of Anne de Chambré, is divided into 12 parts, each named after one of the Greek modes, and is illustrated with engravings after Le Sueur, Abraham Bosse and Robert de Nanteuil. His output (and that of Ennemond too), which was originally entirely for lute, comprises principally dances, some of which are indicated by subtitles selected from mythology. The two composers developed the tombeau, which in fact they pioneered in lute music. Their use of tonality is often more adven-turous than that of their predecessors. Froberger was one of several composers of keyboard music who found inspiration in the style of their music, not least the textures; some compositions by the Gaultiers indeed were transcribed for harpsichord in the 17th century. Perrine also used pieces by them when he experimented about 1680 with the writing of lute music in staff notation.

BIBLIOGRAPHYO. Fleischer: ‘Denis Gaultier’, VMw, ii (1886), 1–180E.W. Häfner: Die Lautenstücke des Denis Gaultier (Endingen, 1939)M. Rollin and F.P. Goy, eds.: Oeuvres de Denis Gautier (Paris, 1996)

Gaultier [Gautier, Gaulthier], Ennemond

(b Villette, Dauphiné, 1575; d Nèves, nr Villette, 11 Dec 1651). French composer and lutenist. To distinguish him from his cousin denis Gaultier, he was often referred to as ‘le vieux Gaultier’; he was also known as ‘Gaultier de Lyon’ (Lyon is the nearest important city to his birthplace). He was page to the Duchess of Montmorency in Languedoc. He then served as valet de chambre to Henri IV’s queen (the former Maria de’ Medici) from the beginning of her reign in 1600 until her exile in 1631. During these years he won fame at court as a lutenist and teacher of the lute; about 1630 he was sent to England, where he played before Charles I, Queen Henrietta Maria and the Duke of Buckingham. He retired to Dauphiné in 1631: presumably this is why none of his works, which were widely admired, were published during his lifetime.

Lack of publication is one of the factors that have made it so difficult to separate Ennemond Gaul-tier’s music (all originally for lute) from that of his cousin Denis, with whom he was so closely identified: the question is discussed more fully in the article on Denis Gaultier, as is the nature of their music. They were the most important French lutenists of the 17th century, and their works are the most significant French contribution to the lute music of the period.

BIBLIOGRAPHYM. Brenet: ‘Notes sur l’histoire du luth en France’, RMI, v (1898), 637–76; vi (1899), 1–44; pubd se-parately (Turin, 1899/R)J. Ecorcheville: ‘Le luth et sa musique’, BSIM, iv (1908), 131–64L. de La Laurencie: Les luthistes (Paris, 1928)M. Rollin: Introduction to Oeuvres du Vieux Gautier, ed. A. Souris and M. Rollin, CM and Corpus des luthistes français, unnumbered vol. (Paris, 1966, 2/1980)

79