Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

21
OMR Scanner vs. Image Scanner + OMR Software

description

Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

Transcript of Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

Page 1: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

OMR Scanner vs.

Image Scanner + OMR Software

Page 2: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

Data Collection Systems

Data Collection Systems

OMR Scanners

OMR Software

Page 3: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

How the systems Run?

Editing in case of errorsGet Student Responses

OCR

Generate Report

Scan as Image

Send Image to Remark Office Software

Page 4: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

How the systems Run?

Generate Report

Scan get student responses

Send Student Data toRemark Classic Software

01001010101010100110010101010100100101010101010101010

In case of error it reject it or not based in user constraint

Page 5: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

We have to talk in details for every step of the way

1Accuracy

2Heavy Duty

3Running Cost

Page 6: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

Accuracy

the desired accuracy during scan

1

Page 7: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

» OMR Scanners Consistently 99.9+ % Validation and scoring on the

fly (during scanning). Selected stacker for rejected

papers.

Not in need to expert person exist while scanning.

Accuracy

» OMR Software Up to 99.9 % with Editing Validation and scoring occur

after scanning. Invalid paper go with normal

paper so you will need to search with the scanned images.

There is a need to expert person exist while scanning.

Page 8: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

Why OMR Scanner is more Accurate?

1. Read Head Design

In image scanner if you have the read head begin to waken you will have less accurate in scanning and resolution and you will not know till you have big problems (read head affected with amount of graphics, text and dirty in paper).

In OMR Scanner each column have its own LED and if LED have some problem the scanner will let you know and you can fix only this LED, the LED read the place of data only not all the paper.

Page 9: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

Why OMR Scanner is more Accurate?

2. Feeding

• The feed rollers (tires)The feed rollers used in image only scanners will transfer pencil graphite from the sheet being scanned to subsequent sheets which can easily be read as a mark.

Scantron Engineering changed feed roller material and density to eliminate this graphite transfer problem.

As you can imagine, when pencil graphite is transferred to the following sheets, and read as a mark when there really is no mark intended, high stakes testing results are at serious risk.

• The scanner buffering designThe image only scanner doesn't know if there is an error until 3 sheets after the sheet is fed - much too late to do anything about the error due to scanner buffering design.

Note: The image only scanners with the OCR Software solution would use a pixel count approach for OMR that will create errors when erasures are on the sheet. This approach sets a level of 'fill' for the bubble, say 10% which would be interpreted as a 'hit' for the answer. If there is an erasure on the sheet, and the pixel count for that bubble is 10%, they have a double 'hit', so this results in an error.

Page 10: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

Why OMR Scanner is more Accurate?

3. Mark Discrimination Levels

Image Scanner (Bi-Tone) have no mark discrimination levels while OMR Scanner (256 Gray Scale) have 16 Level

Bi-Tone/No MarkDiscriminationResults

ErrorCorrect

ErrorCorrectErrorCorrectErrorCorrect

CorrectCorrect

CorrectCorrectCorrect

CorrectCorrectError

Results16 Level Mark Discrimination

Correct

CorrectCorrect

CorrectCorrectCorrect

Correct

CorrectCorrect

Correct

CorrectCorrectCorrectCorrect

CorrectCorrect

OriginalDocument

The study that was done at the University of Georgia showed that running a Fujitsu scanner with the remark software produced about a 3% error rate in the scoring. Most of this error was in multiple marks due to erasures being picked up.

Page 11: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

Why OMR Scanner is more Accurate?

4. OCR process

A B C D ERecognition Area for Question

Each choice have its own Recognition AreaOK (A)Wrong (A and B)Wrong (B and C)The image only scanners with the OCR Software solution would use a pixel count approach for OMR that will create errors when erasures are on the sheet. This approach sets a level of 'fill' for the bubble, say 10% which would be interpreted as a 'hit' for the answer. If there is an erasure on the sheet, and the pixel count for that bubble is 10%, they have a double 'hit', so this results in an error.

Page 12: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

Why OMR Scanner is more Accurate?

5. Interactive Transport Printer

Prints information such as:• Error codes.• Date or Timestamp.• Alphanumeric messages. • Batch or serial numbers.• Validation flags.• Test scores (total score or subtest score) .

all this information based on data that is scanned. Printing occurs during scanning so there is no effect on throughput rate.

Image Scanners cannot print on the form because it depend on post-scanning processes.

Page 13: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

2 Heavy Duty

the main factor is to continue with good performance , not to start with good performance

Page 14: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

Heavy Duty

1. Materials

Rollers (tires): o In image scanner the rollers like printers manufactured from material which

affected with dirty and graphite and cleaning material so it can easily read as a mark.

o In Scantron OMR Scanner engineers changed roller material and density to eliminate this graphite transfer problem and to be easy to clean.

Read head:o In image scanner it’s one unit (contain camera, mirrors & lamp).o In OMR Scanner it’s 48 LED (using infrared).

Page 15: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

Heavy Duty

2. Daily Usage: The image scanner have limited pages to be scanned per day (for

example scanner PANASONIC KV-S2048C scan maximum 6,000 page per day).

Scantron OMR Scanner can work 24 hours per day.

Page 16: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

Heavy Duty

3. Open Feed Path:

The image scanner have not open feed path so it’s increase the probability of Jam and in case of jam it’s not easy to overcome this jam

In OMR Scanner Open feed path design for direct access to roller assemblies and read heads simplifies cleaning and document removal

Page 17: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

3 Running Cost

Page 18: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

Running Cost

1. Form Design (Capacity)

• Remark uses larger bubbles and cannot space them as closely on the forms as we can with a traditional OMR form. This could create altering tests or going to a 2 page response where with an OMR form this would not be an issue.

Page 19: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

Running Cost

Printing

Desktop Printer* In case of small amount of forms.* Problems of packing & printing quality.* Parts lifetime which affect in quality (like heater or toner line lengthwise the form).* Form Shifting.

Print Planet* In case of large amount of forms (or accurate forms).

* Easy packing & high printing quality.* Avoid headache of low quality of printing due to the parts lifetime (like heater or toner).* Avoid the cost of printer depreciation.* Decrease the probability of Shifting to the minimum rate.

Page 20: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

Running Cost

3. Machine Cost

• Image scanners are not designed for serving this area, and if we want to have image scanner which is suitable for this area we will find it in the high volume category and it cost a lot.

• In the other hand OMR Scanners is designed specially for serving this area so it works for long time and it has modified to strengthens some components which make the lifetime of scanner is more longer with the needed accuracy.

Page 21: Omr scanner vs image scanner v2.0

Questions