Ombudsmanship – Preliminary Thoughts on the Theory and Practice of Ombudsman Presentation to FCO...
-
Upload
barnard-gordon -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Ombudsmanship – Preliminary Thoughts on the Theory and Practice of Ombudsman Presentation to FCO...
Ombudsmanship – Preliminary Thoughts on the Theory and
Practice of OmbudsmanPresentation to FCO Investigative Skills Workshop
January 22, 2012Toronto, Ontario
byGreg Levine
© Gregory J. Levine, 2012
Outline
• Introduction – Common Ideals and Threads; Preliminary Definitions; Brief Historical Sketch
• Types of Ombudsmen and their Mandates• Key Concepts and Operational Conundrums:
Independence, Impartiality, Confidentiality, Administrative Justice, and Fairness
• Effectiveness Issues – Resources, Fairness • Accountability – Reporting, Answerability,
Stewardship
Types of Ombudsmen
Ombudsmen may be grouped various ways and with various typologies:
• Organizational Hierarchy – Legislative and Executive/Organizational
• Conveyance of Powers – Legislation; Contract• Breadth of Mandate - General; Specialty• Method of operation – Investigative, Mediative,
Hybrid• Nature of Powers – Investigative powers;
Process Protections
Defining Ombudsmanship
• Ombudsmanship is the just reclamation of aggrieved human dignity through understanding and resolving of administrative problems by means of critical information gathering and the use of the redemptive powers of logic and persuasion.
Common Ideals
All ombudsmen seek to:• Behave compassionately, empathetically
and with decency• Engage others and their work fairly• Seek justice• Work with meaning and efficacy• Act with conviction and optimism
Common Foundations
• Trust• Legitimacy• An ombudsman without trust loses
efficacy; an ombudsman acting without legitimacy loses trust
Key Concepts
• Fairness• Independence• Impartiality• Confidentiality
Fairness and Administrative Justice
• Fairness – fair play (process), fair results (substance); process (no bias, right to be heard), substance (justice, equity)
• Administrative Justice – “justice at all levels of government” and “a means to attain justice, morally and legally defined in respect of governmental and administrative action”
(Levine, Law of Government Ethics – Federal, Ontario and British Columbia (2007), p.50)
Independence
• Freedom to do one’s work without coercion; in the ombudsman context, freedom to form opinions, conduct inquiries, report, recommend and settle matters free from interference and coercion
Ensuring Independence
• Conditions which promote independence – security of tenure, status of position, selection process
• Independence is never absolute • Having independence and using it are not
the same
Impartiality
• Free from bias as between complainants and complainants and institutions
• Free from bias as to nature and subject matter of complaint
• Having an open mind but not a blank one – must evaluate facts and assess situations within a framework of knowledge and understanding
Neutrality
• Non-alignment with parties – similar to but not the same as impartiality
Confidentiality
• Keeping confidences• Core element of ombudsmanship -
operating in a manner which protects information and uses and discloses it appropriately
• Core protection for those who encounter the ombudsman process but not an absolute protection
Ensuring Confidentiality
• Law – legislation, common law• Practice – securing records; establishing
privacy in investigative and mediative practices
Effectiveness
• Methods• Resources• Staff
Staff
• Larger operations must have staff besides the Ombudsman
• Deserve support and respect
Resources
• Resources Matter - never underestimate the obvious
• Adequate resourcing – finances, equipment, training are critical to an effective operation
Methods
• Investigation – informal/formal; ability to summons and use subpoenas depends on legislative authority; ability to gather information in the absence of legislative authority depends on policy, contract and common law.
• Mediation – focus for some ombudsmen, technique for others – use of depends on mandate and authority as above
Accountability
• Answerability• Stewardship
Answerability
• Answer for one’s conduct; report on operations
• Outline actions in cases; report to complainants, institutions
Stewardship
• Obligation to use resources prudently• Obligation to report on that use
Thank you
• Please feel free to comment or raise questions about this presentation – my e-mail is: [email protected]
• Please visit my websites online at: http://publish.uwo.ca/~glevine/GovtEthicsLaw• and http://www.govtethicslaw.ca (Note that this site is being reconstructed)