Olsen 2005 Trade and Conservation of Himalayan Medicinal Plants
-
Upload
adina-roxana-munteanu -
Category
Documents
-
view
83 -
download
2
Transcript of Olsen 2005 Trade and Conservation of Himalayan Medicinal Plants
www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon
Biological Conservation 125 (2005) 505–514
BIOLOGICAL
CONSERVATION
Trade and conservation of Himalayan medicinal plants:Nardostachys grandiflora DC. and Neopicrorhiza scrophulariiflora
(Pennell) Hong
C.S. Olsen *
The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Centre for Forest, Landscape and Planning, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
Received 11 June 2004
Available online 2 June 2005
Abstract
There is a large annual international trade in the rhizomes of the alpine Himalayan perennials Nardostachys grandiflora DC. and
Neopicrorhiza scrophulariiflora (Pennell) Hong, both species in a monotypic genus. This paper estimates the range of the annual trade
levels and discusses the conservation implications. Data was collected through a nation-wide survey inNepal using standardised open-
ended interviews with 223 harvesters, 149 local traders, 90 central wholesalers, 53 regional wholesalers, and 16 processing industries.
Data collection allowed cross-checking of findings by comparing an annual supply estimate and an annual consumption estimate.
Regarding methodology, it is concluded that using agents� own-reported values results in reliable volume and value estimates; how-
ever, validity should be treated with caution, as there is evidence of systematic bias in price reporting and underestimation of quan-
tities. Trade data is thus evaluated to constitute conservative estimates, with local trader derived data being more valid than
wholesaler derived data. Annual trade levels fromNepal are estimated at 100–500 tonnes ofN. grandiflora rhizomes and 175–770 ton-
nes of N. scrophulariiflora rhizomes. In the case year of 1997/1998, the respective global amounts were estimated at 350–400 and 650–
1000 tonnes (of which a maximum of 50–300 tonnes are from Picrorhiza kurrooa whose rhizomes are mixed with P. scrophulariiflora
and traded under the name kutki) with a total CIF value of USD 2.7–3.6 million. Nepal is the main supplier (82 ± 5% ofN. grandiflora
and 66 ± 12 of kutki) followed by India (13 ± 5 and 19 ± 12) and Bhutan (5 ± 4 and 14 ± 8). The importance of applying a regional
approach to conservation of the species is emphasised, as is the need for improved official trade monitoring by governments.
� 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Non-timber forest products; Trade; Conservation; CITES; Nepal; India; Himalayas
1. Introduction
Himalayan medicinal plants appear to have beentraded for millennia (Jacob and Jacob, 1993). However,
only in recent years have commercially traded Himala-
yan plant species received scientific attention as their po-
tential for contributing to rural livelihoods are being
discussed, as are the conservation consequences of har-
vest and trade. Recent studies have focused on identify-
ing the species and products in trade (e.g., Manandhar,
0006-3207/$ - see front matter � 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.013
* Tel: +45 3528 1763.
E-mail address: [email protected].
1980; Murty, 1993), outlining trade patterns (e.g.,
Farooquee and Saxena, 1996; Holley and Cherla,
1998; Olsen, 1998; Mulliken, 2000), assessing policyand legislative environments (e.g., Olsen and Helles,
1997; Larsen et al., 2000), investigating local resource
management systems (e.g., Larsen, 2002), examining
cultivation and domestication issues (e.g., Hertog and
Wiersum, 2000; Nadeem et al., 2000) and estimating
the importance of trade to rural harvesters (e.g., Olsen
and Larsen, 2003). It has been established that products
from hundreds of species are being traded, that tradespans from remote forests and meadows to international
markets and consumers, that almost all traded material
506 C.S. Olsen / Biological Conservation 125 (2005) 505–514
is harvested in the wild, that markets are working even if
they are not perfect, and that harvest and sale provides
an important source of income to a huge number of rur-
al households. However, for all species, data on annual
quantities traded remain scarce or non-existent. Almost
all trade studies are conducted at local level and can notbe used to draw general conclusions at the species, mar-
ket or national level.
Lack of data also impedes assessment of the conser-
vation status of the traded species. Local level assess-
ments are available for some species and locations
(e.g., Kala, 2000; Rai et al., 2000), but no systematic
assessment has been conducted for any of the major
traded species across their distribution area. Conserva-tion Assessment and Management Plan (CAMP) work-
shops have been conducted for Jammu-Kashmir and
Himachal Pradesh (Ved and Tandon, 1998) and Nepal
(Tandon et al., 2001). The most widely held conserva-
tion view on commercial Himalayan medicinal plant
species is that a large number of species are endangered
due to a combination of over-harvesting and habitat
destruction (e.g., Shrestha and Joshi, 1996; Rai et al.,2000). Due to lack of solid empirical data, the scientific
foundation of the view is weak. Recent attempts to de-
sign systematic approaches to medicinal plant conserva-
tion priority setting (Cunningham, 1997; Dhar et al.,
2000) emphasise the need for combining trade data
and biological information at the species level.
1.1. Nardostachys grandiflora and Neopicrorhiza
scrophulariiflora
There has been much interest in the species N. gran-
diflora DC. (syn. N. jatamansi DC. and N. chinensis
Batal.) and N. scrophulariiflora (Pennell) Hong (syn.
Picrorhiza scrophulariiflora Pennell) from both trade-
livelihood and conservation points of view. Both species
are alpine perennial herbs found only in the Himalayas.Both are species in a monotypic genus. The rhizomes of
both species are collected by local harvesters throughout
the Himalayas and the air-dried rhizomes are traded
along well-established marketing chains from the alpine
meadows to the cities on the plains of India. The two
species provide almost 50% of the total annual income
from alpine medicinal plant harvest in Nepal and har-
vesting constitutes an integrated part of harvesters� live-lihood strategies (Olsen and Larsen, 2003). Other studies
indicate that the species may have some importance to
rural livelihoods across the Himalayas (Farooquee and
Saxena, 1996; Rai et al., 2000). Furthermore, there are
indications of a rising demand for Himalayan plant
based medicinal and cosmetic products (Holley and
Cherla, 1998; Olsen, 1998) that could lead to increased
harvest levels of the two species.N. grandiflora has been reported from India, Nepal,
Bhutan and South-west China from 3600–4800 masl
(Polunin and Stainton, 1984) but may also occur in
Afghanistan and Pakistan (Mulliken, 2000). N. scro-
phulariiflora is found from westernmost Nepal to Bhu-
tan and Yunnan in China from 3600–4800 masl
(Polunin and Stainton, 1984; Smit, 2000). It may also
occur just west of Nepal in the Indian Garhwal Hima-laya (Smit, 2000).
Some authors regard P. scrophulariiflora as a synonym
for P. kurrooa Royle ex Benth. rather than an indepen-
dent species. However, taxonomical differences arguably
warrant distinction between two monotypic genera
(Hong, 1984; Smit, 2000). N. scrophulariiflora (Pennell)
Hong has been reserved as the official name of the species
(Brummitt, 1992) and is used here. Rhizomes of P. kur-rooa (from western Himalaya) and N. scrophulariiflora
(from central and eastern Himalaya) both enter trade un-
der the name kutki. The rhizomes of the two kutki species
are morphologically similar and are not distinguished in
trade. N. grandiflora and P. kurrooa were included in
CITES Appendix II in 1997; the annotation includes
the ‘‘whole and sliced roots and parts of the roots, exclud-
ing manufactured parts or derivatives’’ which is taken toinclude the rhizomes (Mulliken, 2000). N. scrophulariifl-
ora is not CITES listed. Both N. grandiflora and N. scro-
phulariiflora have been assessed as being vulnerable in
Nepal (Tandon et al., 2001).
1.2. Objectives of the paper
Thus, the two species form an interesting case as theyare: (i) harvested destructively, i.e., up-rooted, in large
quantities, (ii) important for income generation in a
large number of rural households, (iii) traded across na-
tional borders, (iv) distributed only in alpine habitats in
the Himalayas, and (v) both phylogenetic distinct,
occurring in monotypic genera. N. scrophulariiflora is
further interesting as the traded rhizomes are mixed with
morphologically similar rhizomes from the CITESAppendix II listed species P. kurrooa. A TRAFFIC re-
port to the CITES secretariat (Mulliken, 2000) has also
emphasised the need for further investigation of the
trade in these species. On the basis of empirical data,
the present paper provides a national level estimate of
the volume and value of trade in air-dried rhizomes of
N. grandiflora and N. scrophulariiflora from Nepal,
and estimates the importance of the Himalayan statesas suppliers of the products jatamansi and kutki. The
conservation implications of the findings are discussed.
2. Methods
Anational level investigation of themedicinal and aro-
matic plant trade in and from Nepal was designed. Fieldwork was conducted from August 1998 to September
1999 and covered a set of products including the rhizomes
C.S. Olsen / Biological Conservation 125 (2005) 505–514 507
ofN. grandiflora andN. scrophulariiflora. General data as
well as data for the case year 1997/1998 were collected.
Nepal was stratified into 15 cells using the three main
physiographic zones and five development regions as
proxies for altitude and climatic variations. In each cell,
a district was randomly chosen, see Fig. 1. In each district,all local traders (n = 149 of which 32 tradedN. grandiflora
and 48 traded N. scrophulariiflora) were identified and
interviewed. Harvesters (n = 223), gathering the two spe-
cies in the chosen districts, were randomly met en route
and interviewed. All 90 exporters of medicinal and aro-
matic plants to India in the case year of 1997/1998
(n = 20 forN. grandiflora rhizomes and n = 30 forN. scro-
phulariiflora) were interviewed. A total of 53 wholesalersin India (n = 38 trading N. grandiflora and n = 32 for N.
scrophulariiflora) were located and interviewed in the se-
ven main cities importing medicinal plants from Nepal
(Delhi, Lucknow, Kanpur, Kannauj, Siliguri, Tanakpur,
Calcutta). All interviews were conducted using standar-
dised open-ended questionnaires. Copies of invoices,
including details of products exported, amounts and
prices, kept in the Department of Foreign Trade wereanalysed to investigate export to countries other than In-
dia and China in the case year 1997/1998. Finally, 16
domestic Nepalese producers using medicinal and aro-
matic plants were interviewed to obtain an overview of
the domestic demand for the species.
Thus, assuming no stock-piling or depletion in the
chain of commerce, data allows a comparison of two
estimates of the same trade: (i) an annual supply esti-
High mountains
Middle hills
Terai
80o N
30o E
Development region border
FAR WESTERN
MID-WESTERN
WESTERN
Darchula Humla
Mustang
Case district border
INDIA
Baitadi
Rupandehi
Palpa
Dang
Surkhet
Kailali
Fig. 1. Field work districts, physiograph
mate calculated as the annual amount entering trade,
derived from the local trader survey, and (ii) an annual
consumption estimate calculated as the sum of export to
India, China, third countries and domestic industrial
demand.
2.1. Data analysis
The district level data (15 districts) was generalised to
the national level (75 districts) by extrapolating the find-
ings in each district to the other districts in the same cell.
The number of districts in each cell varied from 2 to 10.
It is assumed that vegetation distribution, quality and
harvesting pressure is similar within cells. Generalisationof findings to other districts in the same cell was done on
the basis of the potential growing area of each species in
each district and using an ecological zone adjustment
factor:
Qij ¼ ðpij=picÞejcQic ð1Þ
where Qij is the estimated amount (kg) of species i
(i = 1,2) traded from district j (j = 1,2, . . . , 60); pij is
the estimated potential growing area of species i in dis-trict j; pic is the estimated potential growing area of spe-
cies i in case district c (c = 1,2, . . . , 15) in the cell
containing district j; ejc is the ecological zone adjustment
factor calculated as the alpine vegetation area in district
j divided by that in the case district c in the cell contain-
ing district j; and Qic is the recorded amount (kg) of
product from species i traded from the case district c.
N
200 km
CENTRALEASTERN
Nuwakot
Dolakha
Taplejung
TIBET
Rautahat
Udaipur
Morang
ic zones and development regions.
508 C.S. Olsen / Biological Conservation 125 (2005) 505–514
Estimation of the potential growing area was done:
(i) the altitudinal range of the species in Nepal was esti-
mated based on the voucher specimens in the Kath-
mandu National Herbarium in Godovari and informal
discussions with botanists, (ii) this range was related to
the altitudinal distribution of ecological zones describedby Lillesø et al. (2001), and (iii) the area of the relevant
ecological zones were calculated for each district using
the percentage distribution of ecological zones for all dis-
tricts in Nepal provided by Lillesø et al. (2001). In step
one, the altitudinal range of N. grandiflora was estimated
at 3200–4500 masl, and at 3500–4800 for N. scro-
phulariiflora. These estimates are close to those found
in the literature for the entire distribution range (Poluninand Stainton, 1984) and for Nepal (Shrestha and Joshi,
1996). In step two, both species were assigned to the
sub-alpine (3000–4000 masl), alpine (4000–5000) and
transhimalayan (>3000) ecological zones. In step three,
the altitudinal range and distribution across ecological
zones is combined with the district size to calculate the
potential growing area of the species in the district,
e.g., 18.6% of Baglung District is found in the sub-alpinezone; this gives a potential growing area ofN. grandiflora
of (800/1000*0.186*district size) in that ecological zone.
For calculations regarding the transhimalayan ecological
zone, the upper limit of the zone is set at 5000 masl.
The ecological zone adjustment factor is used as there
may be differences in the actual area of vegetation be-
tween districts that have a similar potential growing
area. Ideally, the factor should be calculated based onthe actual area of the vegetation types in which the spe-
cies occurs while taking into account the species� altitu-dinal range. However, this information is not available.
Instead, the area of alpine vegetation in each district is
assumed equal to the area of High Himalaya and High
Mountain pastures in each district using the estimates
provided by ISRSC (2001).
The total supply from Nepal of each species is calcu-lated as the sum of findings from each of the 75 districts.
Table 1
Amount and value of annual export of unprocessed N. grandiflora (jatamansi)
based on central wholesaler interviews
Development
region
Low estimatea High estimatea 1997/
Jatamansi Kutki Jatamansi Kutki Jatam
Eastern 17 30.5 41.5 126 24.5
Central 2 9 8 39 5
Western 10 16 50 50 50
Mid-western 69 37.3 326 152 204
Far-western 3.5 8.5 11 39 5.8
Nepal 101.5 101.3 436.5 406 289.3
All amounts in tonnes, all values in �000 USD (68 Nepalese rupees/USD).a Derived from interviews with all central wholesalers (exporters) of N. gran
wholesalers.b Calculated as ((low + high estimates)/2)*av. buying price in India in 1997
is derived from interviews with regional wholesalers importing N. grandiflora
2.8 ± 0.2 USD/kg, respectively.
Note that data collection allows the district estimate Qij
to be calculated as the minimum amount traded in a bad
year, the maximum amount traded in a good year, as
well as the amount traded in the case year 1997/1998.
2.2. Cross-checking own-reported values
The trade data relies on the interviewed agents� own-estimates of values. These values may be incorrect, e.g.,
if regional wholesalers feel obliged to answer questions
but do not wish to disclose information. It is thus neces-
sary to evaluate the quality of the obtained data on
prices and quantities. This is done by: (i) calculating ba-
sic distributional statistics for prices in locations withmany buyers (if responses are invalid, a high degree of
randomness in responses would be expected), (ii) com-
paring reported buying and selling prices in the same
location, and (iii) comparing findings on amounts to
previous studies.
3. Results
The findings on trade in air-dried rhizomes of N.
grandiflora and N. scrophulariiflora are presented in five
parts: (i) estimating annual consumption of plant mate-
rial from Nepal, (ii) estimating annual supply from Ne-
pal, (iii) estimating global supply, (iv) presenting an
overview of regional wholesalers� knowledge of trade re-lated legislation, and (v) presenting data on the financialimportance of harvest to rural livelihoods.
3.1. Estimating annual consumption
3.1.1. Export to India
Figures for export of unprocessed air-dried rhizomes
of N. grandiflora and N. scrophulariiflora from Nepal to
India, based on interviews with central wholesalers (theexporters), are presented in Table 1. There is a large
and N. scrophulariiflora (kutki) air-dried rhizomes from Nepal to India
1998 estimatea Av. export valueb 1997/1998 export value
ansi Kutki Jatamansi Kutki Jatamansi Kutki
100.5 66 220 55 283
22 11 68 11 62
31 67 93 112 87
78.1 443 266 458 220
29 16 67 13 82
260.6 603 714 649 734
diflora (n = 20) and N. scrophulariiflora (n = 30); excludes trade between
/1998 (including transport from Nepal, CIF price). The av. buying price
(n = 37) and N. scrophulariiflora (n = 32) and estimated at 2.2 ± 0.2 and
C.S. Olsen / Biological Conservation 125 (2005) 505–514 509
variation in yearly amount and value of the export; the
annual export ranges from 100 to 435 tonnes jatamansi
and 100 to 400 tonnes kutki. The export in the case year
1997/97 was 289 and 261 tonnes, respectively. The aver-
age value of the export, using the 1997/1998 price level,
for the two species is approximately 1.3 million USD,while the export value in the case year was around 1.4
million USD.
3.1.2. Export to China
As part of the central wholesaler and local trader sur-
veys, the export to China (Tibet) was investigated, Table
2. The direct trade with China is far smaller than trade
with India. Only a handful of traders are involved andonly N. scrophulariiflora rhizomes are traded; no direct
export of N. grandiflora rhizomes was recorded. Only
traders in the Eastern and Central Development Re-
gions are involved in direct trade with China. The price
obtained by Nepalese traders is comparable to that ob-
tained in India (Table 1). The annual export is estimated
at 18–57 tonnes with trade in 1997/1998 amounting to
approximately 47 tonnes at a value of USD 110,000.
3.1.3. Export to countries other than India and China
Data provided by the Department of Foreign Trade
was analysed to obtain information on the products ex-
ported to countries other than India and China. Samples
of unprocessed kutki rhizomes were exported to Japan
and the Netherlands; 10 tonnes of jatamansi marc, the
N. grandiflora rhizomes from which essential oil hasbeen extracted, was exported to Pakistan; and small
amounts of jatamansi oil (spikenard oil) were exported
to France, England, Pakistan, Spain, Germany and
South Korea. The total value of kutki exports was just
USD 11 while the value of jatamansi export was USD
29,000. The total value of all medicinal plant exports
to countries other than India and China in the case year
1997/1998 was just USD 247,000.
3.1.4. Estimating domestic industrial demand in Nepal
The only domestic industrial demand is from process-
ing of N. grandiflora rhizomes for essential oil. Besides
Table 2
Amount and value of annual export of unprocessed N. scrophulariiflora air-
district interviews
Development region Low estimatea High estimatea 1997/
Eastern 16 50 44
Central 2.1 6.5 2.8
Western 0 0 0
Mid-western 0 0 0
Far-western 0 0 0
Nepal 18.1 56.5 46.8
All amounts in tonnes, all values in �000 USD (68 Nepalese rupees/USD).a Derived from interviews with central wholesalers (n = 2) and local traderb Calculated as ((low + high estimates)/2)*av. selling price in Tibet in 1997
Nepal, at 2.3 ± 0.1 USD/kg.
the oil, this produces marc which is also exported. Based
on the N. grandiflora processor interviews (n = 9), the
annual demand for air-dried N. grandiflora rhizomes is
estimated at 10,000–246,000 kg with 201,000 kg pur-
chased by processors in the case year 1997/1998. Small
amounts of oil are sold in the domestic market and over-seas to countries such as Germany and England but the
dominant market is India. Assuming an average oil con-
tent of 1.5% and an average selling price of USD 140/kg
of oil, the value of production in 1997/1998 was approx-
imately USD 422,000. This gives a total value of N.
grandiflora exports in the case year of USD 1.1 million.
3.2. Estimating annual supply
The district level trade data estimates the size of the
entire annual harvest of the two species in Nepal. An
overview of the amounts of N. grandiflora and N. scro-
phulariiflora rhizomes entering trade based on the dis-
trict survey is presented in Table 3.
The figures in Table 3 indicate that the Eastern and
Central Development Regions are the most importantsupply areas for N. grandiflora rhizomes. The amounts
registered in the Western Development Region are very
low. Most supplies originate in the High Mountain
physiographic zone with only minor amounts from the
Middle Hills. Table 3 also indicates that the Eastern
Development Region is the dominant supply area for
N. scrophulariiflora rhizomes. The Central, Mid-western
and Far-western Development Regions provide approx-imately the same amounts. Registered supplies from the
Western Development Region are very low. Again, the
High Mountain physiographic zone is the most
important.
On basis of the district survey, the annual supply (RNepal9) of N. grandiflora air-dried rhizomes is estimated
at 70–330 tonnes, with a trade in 1997/1998 of 180 ton-
nes. The figures for N. scrophulariiflora are 175–770 ton-nes and 520 tonnes. The estimated annual consumption
figures (R Nepal10) are also provided; they are higher
than supply for N. grandiflora and lower for N.
scrophulariiflora.
dried rhizomes from Nepal to China based on central wholesaler and
1998 estimatea Av. export valueb 1997/1998 Export value
77 103
10 7
0 0
0 0
0 0
87 110
s (n = 4) dealing directly with China.
/1998. The latter is estimated, on the basis of the trader interviews in
Table 3
Annual amounts of unprocessed N. grandiflora and N. scrophulariiflora air-dried rhizomes entering trade in Nepal, based on district level survey
District survey N. grandiflora N. scrophulariiflora
Case districta Cell (no. of districts
in cell)
Low estimate High estimate 1997/1998 estimate Low estimate High estimate 1997/1998 estimate
Taplejung EDR High Mts. (3) 22 62 62 128 523 326
Dolakha CDR High Mts. (3) 16 116 48 10 34 22
Nuwakot CDR Middle Hills (9) 14 49 22 13 57 35
Mustang WDR High Mts. (3) 1 2 1 1 4 3
Humla MDR High Mts. (4) 12 54 32 10 70 66
Darchula FDR High Mts. (3) 9 44 16 15 78 65
R Nepal1 High mountains (16) 60 278 159 164 709 482
R Nepal2 Middle hills (39) 14 49 22 13 57 35
R Nepal3 Terai (20) 0 0 0 0 0 0
R Nepal4 EDR (16) 22 62 62 128 523 326
R Nepal5 CDR (19) 30 165 70 23 91 57
R Nepal6 WDR (16) 1 2 1 1 4 3
R Nepal7 MDR (15) 12 54 32 10 70 66
R Nepal8 FDR (9) 9 44 16 15 78 65
R Nepal9 Whole country (75) 73 327 181 176 765 517
R Nepal10b Whole country 111.5 682.5 490.3 119.4 462.5 307.4
All amounts in tonnes.a Includes only the districts where trade in the species was documented.b Calculated by summing the figures for export and domestic industrial demand.
Table 5
Estimate of annual amount (tonnes) and value (million USD) of
unprocessed air-dried rhizomes of N. grandiflora and kutki in trade in
1997/1998 based on origin of supplies and the Nepal national level
trade data
Supply country N. grandiflora Kutki
Amounta Valueb Amountc Valueb
Nepal 300 0.7 517 1.5
India 28–70 0.1–0.2 46–297 0.1–0.8
Bhutan 3–35 0.0–0.1 40–211 0.1–0.6
Global 345–390 0.8–0.9 663–957 1.9–2.7
a Amount for Nepal derived from combination of supply and con-
sumption estimates, see Section 4.b Calculated using the average regional wholesaler CIF buying prices
in India, Table 6.c Amount for Nepal using the annual supply estimate, see Section 4.
510 C.S. Olsen / Biological Conservation 125 (2005) 505–514
3.3. Estimating global supply of unprocessed jatamansi
and kutki rhizomes
Through interviews with regional wholesalers in In-
dia, the importance of different countries as supply
sources for rhizomes of the two species was investigated.
Only Nepal, Bhutan and India were mentioned as sup-ply countries. Of the 38 and 32 regional wholesalers in
India trading, respectively, N. grandiflora and kutki, 29
and 24 provided information on origin of supplies, Ta-
ble 4. Nepal is estimated to supply 82 ± 5% of N. gran-
diflora and 66 ± 12% of kutki rhizomes and is clearly the
main global supplier of both products; all involved
wholesalers obtain at least 70% of their N. grandiflora
supplies and 30% of kutki supplies from Nepal. Indiais the second largest supplier of both products followed
by Bhutan. The variation between wholesalers, as ex-
pressed in the min–max ranges, is due to differences in
locations.
Table 4
Summary of regional wholesalers� perception of origin of supplies of
unprocessed air-dried rhizomes of N. grandiflora (n = 29) and kutki
(n = 24)
Supply country N. grandiflora Kutkia
Mean ± s.d. Min–max Mean ± s.d. Min–max
Nepal 82 ± 5 70–90 66 ± 12 30–80
India 13 ± 5 5–20 19 ± 12 5–70
Bhutan 5 ± 4 0–15 14 ± 8 0–25
All figures in %.a Kutki in this table includes rhizomes of both N. scrophulariiflora
and P. kurrooa.
Using the information on origin of supplies in Table 4
and the supply and consumption estimates in Table 3 al-
low an estimation of the total global amount of unpro-
cessed air-dried N. grandiflora and kutki rhizomes,
Table 5. The trade in 1997/1998 is estimated at 350–
400 tonnes of N. grandiflora rhizomes with a CIF value
of USD 0.8–0.9 million, and 650–1000 tonnes of kutki
rhizomes CIF valued at USD 1.9–2.7 million. Forthe latter, the Indian estimate of 50–300 tonnes is a
maximum estimate of the CITES listed P. kurrooa trade
– subtracting the unknown amounts of N. scrophulariifl-
ora originating from Sikkim and possibly Garhwal
Himalaya would provide a more accurate P. kurrooa
estimate.
C.S. Olsen / Biological Conservation 125 (2005) 505–514 511
3.4. Wholesaler knowledge of trade related legislation
Regional wholesalers in India have by far the best
educational background of any of the actors involved
in the Himalayan plant trade: 84.9% has a university le-
vel education (Olsen and Bhattarai, 2005). Their knowl-edge of trade related legislation was investigated as part
of the regional wholesaler survey: 73.6% claimed knowl-
edge of the Indian Negative List of Exports, 71.7%
claimed knowledge of Nepali legislation (such as
requirement for harvesting permits and royalty pay-
ments), while only 34% claimed to be familiar with
CITES. A total of 24.5% found that legislation was
problematic, especially as it allowed for rent-seekingby police, customs and forest officials. Probing showed,
however, that knowledge of Nepali legislation and
CITES was often superficial. The reason may be that
the knowledge is not required as legislation is not en-
forced. As one wholesaler noted ‘‘. . . every banned item
is in trade, legislation has no impact in any sense’’. The
lack of legislative enforcement has previously been
noted as a problem with CITES implementation in theregion (Mulliken, 2000) and the problem with illegal ex-
ports from Nepal is widely recognised.
3.5. Financial importance to rural livelihoods
The average amount sold per harvester is
43.6 ± 7.0 kg N. grandiflora (n = 82) and 43.5 ± 6.9 kg
N. scrophulariiflora (n = 116). Using the harvesters�own-reported selling prices, Table 6, the average value
of rhizome sale in 1997/1998 was, respectively, USD
29.9 and USD 49.5 per harvester. Using the total har-
vests of, respectively, 300 tonnes and 517 tonnes indi-
cates that approximately 7000 and 12,000 harvesters
are involved, generating a total income of USD
800,000. Given an average annual household cash in-
come of small farm rural households in hills of USD162.9 (NHDP, 1998), and assuming one harvester per
household, the harvest of N. grandiflora and N. scro-
phulariiflora provides some 19,000 households from
18% to 30% of their annual cash income. If several
households pool their harvest before travelling and sell-
Table 6
Basic distributional statistics for selected own-reported prices (Nr/kg, 1997–
Price n Mean s.d
N. grandiflora
Harvester sale 95 46.7 10
Local trader purchase 32 60.5 11
Regional wholesaler purchase 37 152.5 11
N. scrophulariiflora
Harvester sale 127 77.4 12
Local trader purchase 48 87.9 15
Regional wholesaler purchase 32 191.5 12
ing to local traders, the number of households would be
higher and the percentage income lower. All rhizomes
are harvested in the wild (n = 21 harvester groups for
N. grandiflora and n = 26 for N. scrophulariiflora).
4. Discussion
4.1. Validity and reliability of findings
First, data needs to be considered in view of the two
assumptions made: that vegetation distribution, quality
and harvesting pressure is similar within cells, and that
all central wholesalers and local traders were interviewed.Second, the approach of relying on own-reported values
should be assessed. Consider these in turn:
� The first assumption means that supply of rhizomes
should be comparable between districts in the same
cell. This is not always the case, e.g., it could be
argued that tourism income opportunities in Manang
District leads to different land use patterns, influenc-ing the floristic composition and structure of the rhi-
zome producing alpine pastures and shrubs, than in
upper Gorkha District where there are fewer income
options. Harvesting pressure may thus also differ
within cells. Due to lack of case studies on medicinal
plant utilisation and management, it is not possible to
assess whether the assumption generally holds true.
� The second assumption implies that all relevantwholesalers and traders have been contacted and
interviewed. All located wholesalers and traders par-
ticipated in the interviews, but it may be that some
were not discovered. This is especially relevant for
the smaller and less visible local traders forming the
backbone of the district survey. There is no author-
ised list of wholesalers and traders. This indicates that
trader and wholesaler derived amounts may be con-servative estimates.
� Can own-reported values of trade prices and quanti-
ties be relied upon? Using agents� own-reported prices
has not previously been reported to be problematic in
studies of Himalayan plant trade. To examine this,
1998)
. Median Mode Min Max
.6 45.0 50.0 35.0 95.0
.0 60.0 65.0 40.0 80.0
.7 153.6 152.0 120.0 168.0
.1 80.0 80.0 60.0 105.0
.9 87.5 95.0 40.0 120.0
.9 200.0 200.0 164.8 208.0
512 C.S. Olsen / Biological Conservation 125 (2005) 505–514
the reported prices were first investigated by calculat-
ing basic distributional statistics, Table 6. These
national level findings indicate that each type of eco-
nomic agent provides consistent figures: the standard
deviation is small compared to the mean, the mean
and median values are very close as are the modaland median values. This indicates close clustering
around the mean and little skewness – this would
not be expected if harvesters and traders answered
randomly.
In order to investigate if answers could be systemati-
cally biased, the sale and purchase price of each species
in the same link of the marketing chain (harvesters sell-ing to local traders) was analysed. The one-way ANO-
VA tests show that price means, for both species, are
not equal with significance at 0.1% level. It may be that
harvesters are systematically understating the price ob-
tained from rhizome sale or that local traders are sys-
tematically overstating the price they have paid to
collectors.
The prices that regional wholesalers pay to centralwholesalers form the basis for calculating the value of
trade in this study. There is limited data with which to
assess the validity of these prices. However, it is noted
that the average export price for air-dried N. grandiflora
rhizomes to India of 2.2 ± 0.2 USD/kg (152.5 ± 11.7 Nr/
kg) and China of 2.3 ± 0.1 (158.7 ± 4.3) are comparable.
This may indicate that regional wholesalers have not
been systematically overstating their purchasing prices.The statistics in Table 6 indicate useful and consistent
figures. Some variation is expected within each type of
economic agent as expressed by the min–max range of
prices; previous studies have indicated price variations
across Nepal (Olsen and Helles, 1997).
Regarding own-reported quantities, studies have ar-
gued that there is a considerable illegal export of medic-
inal plants from Nepal to India (e.g., Malla et al., 1995).The official District Forest Office records for 1997/1998
(DoF, 1999) put national level harvest at 61,078 kg
kutki and 96,592 kg jatamansi. This corresponds to,
respectively, 12% and 53% of the district level estimates
provided in Table 3, indicating huge illegal harvest and
trade. This creates an incentive for traders and wholesal-
ers to underestimate traded quantities. Furthermore, in
the case year, export of unprocessed N. grandiflora rhi-zomes was illegal. This provides an additional incentive
for the exporting central wholesalers to underestimate
traded amounts. There is thus ample reason to regard
reported quantities as conservative estimates.
4.2. Comparing supply and consumption estimates
Based on the above, though both are likely to be toolow, it would be expected that the annual supply figure is
more accurate than the annual consumption figure, as
local traders have less incentive to understate traded
amounts than wholesalers. It would thus be expected
that the annual supply figure is higher than the con-
sumption figure. However, the opposite is found for
N. grandiflora. This is due to a combination of factors
leading to too low supply estimate and too high con-sumption estimate. The low supply estimate is caused
by failure to properly estimate the trade level for the
Western Development Region: the figure (for both spe-
cies) in Table 3 does not compare to available case stud-
ies. Olsen and Helles (1997) have estimated the annual
amount entering trade in Gorkha District (probably
the main supplying district in the Western Development
Region) at 25–84 tonnes N. grandiflora rhizomes and 7–18 tonnes N. scrophulariiflora compared to the total
WDR estimate here of, respectively, 1–2 and 1–4 tonnes.
The consumption estimate appears too high due to the
existence of the processing industry: the marc is sold
to India and abroad via the central wholesalers. There
may thus be double reporting of quantities. It may also
be that there is import of N. grandiflora rhizomes from
Tibet to Nepal (Mulliken, 2000) which would be in-cluded in the consumption estimate as Nepali rhizomes.
In conclusion, the valid trade figures for N. grandiflora
fall between the supply and consumption estimates in
Table 3 but are probably closest to the supply estimate.
A crude estimate is made of minimum 100 tonnes, max-
imum 500 tonnes, with around 300 tonnes traded in
1997/1998. There is only a small difference in supply
and consumption estimates due to storage and transportlosses along the marketing chain, e.g., central wholesal-
ers report average storage losses of 2.4 ± 1.9% for N.
grandiflora and no transport losses.
Both the supply and consumption estimates assume
that trade is not influenced by input from stocks. Use
of stocks would lead to inflated estimates. The assump-
tion is supported by low own-reported storage time
(e.g., central wholesalers� average storage time is2.6 ± 0.8 month for N. grandiflora and 2.6 ± 0.9 for N.
scrophulariiflora).
The global supply estimate in Table 5 does not in-
clude production in China and Pakistan and should thus
be considered conservative. There are no figures avail-
able on annual supply or consumption in these coun-
tries. There may be some export of N. grandiflora from
China to Nepal as noted above. China is apparently amajor consumer of N. scrophulariiflora (Olsen, 1998).
4.3. Conservation implications
The original Indian proposals to CITES for listing N.
grandiflora and P. kurrooa mentioned trade levels of,
respectively, 120 and 10–24 tonnes. This study estimates
annual trade levels at 100–500 and 50–300 tonnes. Dueto the distribution of P. kurrooa and N. scrophulariifl-
ora, the majority of the trade in kutki (175–700 tonnes)
C.S. Olsen / Biological Conservation 125 (2005) 505–514 513
is in the not-listed N. scrophulariiflora rather than the
listed P. kurrooa. This indicates that trade levels are
much higher than previously thought and that including
N. scrophulariiflora in Appendix II needs to be given ur-
gent attention. The following should be considered:
� There is no detailed information on the distribution
of the two species, e.g., coverage of the species in
existing protected area networks across the Himala-
yan states. Nor is it clear how effective protection is
in protected areas. There is no information available
on the stock of resources or sustainable harvesting
rates. The apparently high trade levels, and the possi-
bly rising demand, underlines the urgent necessity ofundertaking detailed species level assessments of con-
servation status for both species and establishing sus-
tainable harvest rates. Recent research (Ghimire
et al., 2005) indicates that sustainable commercial
harvest of N. scrophulariiflora may be feasible, while
N. grandiflora appears very sensitive to harvest. The
status survey should include an in-depth investigation
of the causes of population decline, e.g., what is therole and importance of habitat destruction compared
to commercial harvest and trade? Such knowledge is
required to design and implement effective policies
coping with the right threats.
� Due to the financial importance of the species to rural
harvesters, it is suggested that the question of inclu-
sion of N. scrophulariiflora be addressed using the
deliberation-guiding version of the precautionaryprinciple (Dickson, 2000), i.e., in the face of uncertain
conservation data predefined definite actions, such as
simply banning harvest and trade, are not likely to
provide the best solution. The analysis providing
the basis for decision of listing must explicitly include
discussion of both conservationist and social con-
cerns, and must attempt to identify all processes pos-
ing threat to the species.
The estimated high levels of trade also show that
most trade, domestically in Nepal and between range
countries and India, takes place illegally. There is no
doubt that large scale international trade is conducted
outside the controls of CITES, especially between Nepal
and India and to some degree across the Sino-Nepalese
border. Official Nepalese CITES annual export data for1997 and 1998, accessed using the CITES trade database
(UNEP-WCMC, 2005), show no N. grandiflora export
(nor any P. kurrooa export). And, as mentioned above,
the official District Forest Office records (DoF, 1999)
puts national level harvest at just 12% and 53% of the
national harvest levels estimated in Table 3 for N. gran-
diflora and N. scrophulariiflora, respectively. This clearly
shows that official trade monitoring at Nepal�s bordersis very poor. A more effective implementation of CITES
is required.
As Nepal is the major supplier of rhizomes of both
species (and of the product kutki), trade interventions
in Nepal could have significant impact on conservation
of the species (and P. kurrooa) in other Himalayan range
states. For instance, if supplies from Nepal decrease due
to enforcement of the existent ban on export of unpro-cessed N. grandiflora rhizomes or more effective imple-
mentation of CITES, this will lead to increasing prices
and thus increasing harvesting pressure in neighbouring
countries. Isolated national initiatives may have nega-
tive externalities. This and use of the deliberation-
guiding version of the precautionary principle suggests
that Nepal and the other range states should emphasise
regional co-operation on commercial plant conservationissues rather than the national approach currently being
implemented.
5. Conclusions
Even though much of the trade in N. grandiflora and
N. scrophulariiflora is illegal, it is possible to investigatesuch trade at the species level. Trader, wholesaler and
harvester own-reported data should be treated with care
but it appears that data is reliable and that validity is
acceptable as conservative estimates are derived. In gen-
eral, data derived from local trader interviews have
higher validity than data obtained through wholesaler
interviews as the former have fewer incentives to under-
estimate traded amounts. By combining questions onvolume and origin of supplies in regional wholesaler
interviews, and understanding the composition of traded
products, it was possible to establish insight into the
trade of a CITES listed species from findings on trade
in a similar not-listed species.
However, while such trade studies are possible, they
are also time consuming and costly. The only feasible
way to obtain reliable annual trade figures, that can pro-vide useful input to conservation decisions, is to signifi-
cantly improve official trade monitoring.
Trade data revealed much higher levels of trade than
previously reported. This emphasises the need for sus-
tainable management of wild plant populations of the
two species and policies to support such management.
It is argued that trade data and household level informa-
tion is important in order to design effective conserva-tion policies and interventions. Without such data,
conservation measures may prove inefficient. Further
studies on the conservation status of the species are rec-
ommended, including determining distribution and cov-
erage in existing protected area networks, and main
threat factors.
Conservation of the species should be based on a re-
gional rather than a national approach. As Nepal is themain supplier of rhizomes of both species, that are
traded mainly to India and harvested exclusively in the
514 C.S. Olsen / Biological Conservation 125 (2005) 505–514
wild, strict and effective domestic measures may have
serious consequences for harvesting of resources in
neighbouring countries. As most trade taking place is
illegal across national borders, improved official trade
monitoring by governments is required.
Acknowledgements
I am indebted to the many harvesters, traders and
wholesalers who took time to participate in the study.
Nirmal Bhattarai was invaluable during data collection
and Malene Hall is thanked for her contributions to
data handling. An anonymous reviewer provided highlyuseful comments. The study was financed by the Minis-
try of Foreign Affairs and the Royal Veterinary and
Agricultural University, Denmark.
References
Brummitt, R.K., 1992. Vascular Plant Families and Genera. Royal
Botanical Gardens, Kew.
Cunningham, A.B., 1997. The ‘‘Top 50’’ listings and the medicinal
plants action plan. Medicinal Plant Conservation 3, 5–7.
Dhar, U., Rawal, R.S., Upreti, J., 2000. Setting priorities for
conservation of medicinal plants – a case study in the Indian
Himalaya. Biological Conservation 95, 57–65.
Dickson, B., 2000. Precaution at the heart of CITES? In: Hutton, J.,
Dickson, B. (Eds.), Endangered Species – Threatened Convention.
Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, pp. 38–46.
DoF, 1999. Annual Report – F.Y. 2054/55. Department of Forest,
Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu.
Farooquee, N.A., Saxena, K.G., 1996. Conservation and utilisation of
medicinal plants in high hills of the central Himalayas. Environ-
mental Conservation 23, 75–80.
Ghimire, S.K., McKey, D., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., 2005. Conser-
vation of Himalayan medicinal plants: harvesting patterns and
ecology of two threatened species, Nardostachys grandiflora DC.
and Neopicrorhiza scrophulariiflora (Pennell) Hong. Biological
Conservation 124, 463–475.
Hertog, W.H., Wiersum, K.F., 2000. Timur (Zanthoxylum armatum)
production in Nepal: dynamics in non-timber forest resource
management. Mountain Research and Development 20, 136–145.
Holley, J., Cherla, K., 1998. The medicinal plants sector in India. The
International Development Research Center, South Asia Regional
Office, Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Programme in Asia, Delhi.
Hong, D.Y., 1984. Taxonomy and evolution of the Veroniceae
(Scrophulariaceae) with special reference to palynology. Opera
Botanica 75, 5–60.
ISRSC. 2001. District development profile of Nepal. Informal Sector
Research and Study Centre, Kathmandu.
Jacob, I., Jacob, W. (Eds.), 1993. The Healing Past: Pharmaceuticals in
the Biblical and Rabbinic World. E.J. Brill, Leiden.
Kala, C.P., 2000. Status and conservation of rare and endangered
medicinal plants in the Indian trans-Himalaya. Biological Conser-
vation 93, 371–379.
Larsen, H.O., 2002. Commercial medicinal plant extraction in the hills
of Nepal: local management systems and sustainability. Environ-
mental Management 29, 88–101.
Larsen, H.O., Olsen, C.S., Boon, T.E., 2000. The non-timber forest
policy process in Nepal: actors, objectives and power. Forest Policy
and Economics 1, 267–281.
Lillesø, J.-P.B., Shrestha, T.B., Dhakal, L.P., Nayaju, R.P., Tamrakar,
P.R., Shrestha, R., 2001. The map of potential vegetation of Nepal
– a forestry/agro-ecological/biodiversity classification system.
Draft. Natural Resource Management Sector Assistance Program,
Kathmandu.
Malla, S.B., Shakya, P.R., Rajbhandari, K.R., Bhattarai, N.K.,
Subedi, M.N., 1995. Minor forest products of Nepal: general
status and trade. FRIS Project Paper No. 4, Forest Resource
Information System Project, HMGN/FINNIDA, Kathmandu.
Manandhar, N.P., 1980. Medicinal Plants of Nepali Himalaya. Ratna
Pustak Bhandar, Kathmandu.
Mulliken, T.A., 2000. Implementing CITES for Himalayan medicinal
plants Nardostachys grandiflora and Picrorhiza kurrooa. TRAFFIC
Bulletin 18, 63–72.
Murty, T.K., 1993. Minor Forest Products of India. Oxford and IBH
Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., Delhi.
Nadeem, M., Palni, L.M.S., Purohit, A.N., Pandey, H., Nandi, S.K.,
2000. Propagation and conservation of Podophyllum hexandrum
Royle: an important medicinal herb. Biological Conservation 92,
121–129.
NHDP, 1998. Nepal Human Development Report 1998. Nepal South
Asia Centre, Kathmandu.
Olsen, C.S., 1998. The trade in medicinal and aromatic plants from
central Nepal to northern India. Economic Botany 52, 279–292.
Olsen, C.S., Bhattarai, N.K., 2005. A typology of economic agents in
the Himalayan plant trade. Mountain Research and Development
25, 37–43.
Olsen, C.S., Helles, F., 1997. Medicinal plants, markets and margins in
the Nepal Himalaya: Trouble in Paradise. Mountain Research and
Development 17, 363–374.
Olsen, C.S., Larsen, H.O., 2003. Alpine medicinal plant trade and
Himalayan mountain livelihood strategies. Geographical Journal
169, 243–254.
Polunin, O., Stainton, A., 1984. Flowers of the Himalaya. Oxford
University Press, Delhi.
Rai, L.K., Prasad, P., Sharma, E., 2000. Conservation threats to some
important medicinal plants of the Sikkim Himalaya. Biological
Conservation 93, 27–33.
Shrestha, T.B., Joshi, R.M., 1996. Rare, endemic and endangered
plants of Nepal. WWF Nepal Program, Kathmandu.
Smit, F., 2000. Picrorhiza scrophulariiflora, from traditional use to
immunomodulatory activity. Faculteit Farmacie, Universiteit Utr-
echt, Utrecht.
Tandon. V., Bhattarai, N.K., Karki, M. (Eds.), 2001. Conservation
assessment and management plan workshop report: selected
medicinal plants species of Nepal. Medicinal and Aromatic Plants
Program in Asia (MAPPA), International Development Research
Centre (IDRC) and Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation,
Kathmandu.
UNEP-WCMC, 2005. CITES trade database, www.cites.org/eng/
resources/trade.shtml (accessed 07.03.2005).
Ved, D.K., Tandon, V., 1998. CAMP Report for High Altitude
Medicinal Plants of Jammu-Kashmir and Himachal Pradesh.
Foundation for the Revitalisation of Local Health Traditions,
Bangalore.