OLDA Board Mtg Agenda 02-9-11 Final -...

OLDAOLDA

Orangeline Development Authority (OLDA) 16401 Paramount Boulevard ▪ Paramount ▪ California 90723 (562) 663-6850 www.olda.org

OLDA is a joint powers agency

formed to pursue development of a high speed

environmentally friendly transit system in Southern California. The Authority is composed of the following

public agencies:

City of Artesia

City of Bell

City of Bellflower

City of Cerritos

City of Cudahy

City of Downey

City of Glendale

City of Huntington Park

City of Maywood

City of Paramount

City of Santa Clarita

City of South Gate

City of Vernon

Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority

Chairman

Bruce Barrows Councilmember City of Cerritos

Vice Chairman

Frank Quintero Councilmember City of Glendale

Secretary

Maria Davila Vice Mayor

City of South Gate

Treasurer

Mike McCormick Mayor Pro Tem City of Vernon

Auditor

Scott A. Larsen Mayor Pro Tem

City of Bellflower

Executive Director

Michael R. Kodama

General Counsel

Sandra J. Levin

Ex-Officio

James McCarthy Caltrans, District 7

ORANGELINE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REGULAR MEETING

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Bob Hope Airport – Main Terminal

Sky Room – Level Two 2627 N. Hollywood Way, Burbank, CA 91505

Parking: Short-Term Parking Structure

(626) 926-5786 Denise Van Stratten (310) 972-9609 Trisha Murakawa

6:00 PM Dinner 6:30 PM Meeting

A G E N D A

1. Call to Order

2. Pledge of Allegiance

3. Roll Call and Introduction of Attendees

4. Consent Calendar

a. Approval of Mid-Year Budget Revisions

5. Public Comments

6. Approval of Meeting Minutes of January 19, 2011 Meeting

7. Approval of Warrant Register and Treasurer’s Report for January 20, 2011 through February 9, 2011

8. Presentation: Karen Heit, OLDA Deputy Executive Director, OLDA Board Briefing on Japanese High Speed Rail Systems

9. Receive and File: E-76 Obligating Remaining Funds for the OLDA/Cerritos Land Use/Transportation Grant

10. Receive and File: E-76 Obligating Funds for the Bob Hope Airport Ground Access Study

11. Discussion and Possible Action: OLDA Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority and the Bob Hope Airport Ground Access Study

12. Discussion and Possible Action: Proposed Third Amended Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (JEPA)

OLDAOLDA

Orangeline Development Authority (OLDA) 16401 Paramount Boulevard ▪ Paramount ▪ California 90723 (562) 663-6850 www.olda.org

OLDA is a joint powers agency

formed to pursue development of a high speed

environmentally friendly transit system in Southern California. The Authority is composed of the following

public agencies:

City of Artesia

City of Bell

City of Bellflower

City of Cerritos

City of Cudahy

City of Downey

City of Glendale

City of Huntington Park

City of Maywood

City of Paramount

City of Santa Clarita

City of South Gate

City of Vernon

Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority

Chairman

Bruce Barrows Councilmember City of Cerritos

Vice Chairman

Frank Quintero Councilmember City of Glendale

Secretary

Maria Davila Vice Mayor

City of South Gate

Treasurer

Mike McCormick Mayor Pro Tem City of Vernon

Auditor

Scott A. Larsen Mayor Pro Tem

City of Bellflower

Executive Director

Michael R. Kodama

General Counsel

Sandra J. Levin

Ex-Officio

James McCarthy Caltrans, District 7

13. Discussion and Possible Action: Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Pacific Electric Right-of-Way/West Santa Ana Branch Alternative Analysis

14. Approval of an Extension of Professional Services Agreement for Norman Emerson as Consultant to Provide Strategic Counsel to OLDA

15. Discussion and Possible Action: Insurance Coverage for OLDA

16. Discussion and Possible Action: Los Angeles County Strategic Economic Development Plan

17. Update Regarding Legal Counsel Request for Proposal

18. Discussion and Possible Action: Meeting Date for Regular OLDA Board Meetings

19. Discussion and Possible Action: Location of Upcoming OLDA Regular Board Meetings

20. Communication Items to the Board

21. Communication Items from the Board

22. Adjournment

NEXT MEETING: City of Glendale – Date (TBD)

Materials related to any item on this agenda submitted to the Orangeline Development Authority, including any materials submitted to the Authority after distribution of the agenda packet, are available for public inspection in the Orangeline Development Authority’s office located at 16401 Paramount Blvd., Paramount, CA 90723 during normal business hours. The agenda is also available on the Orangeline Development Authority website at www.olda.org subject to staff’s availability to post documents before the meeting.

DRAFT MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF

THE ORANGELINE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 19, 2011

CALL TO ORDER City of Cerritos Councilmember and Board Chair Bruce Barrows called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE City of Paramount Vice Mayor Daryl Hofmeyer led the assembly in the salute to the flag. ROLL CALL AND INTRODUCTION OF ATTENDEES Authority Board Members: Bruce Barrows – Authority Chair, Councilmember, City of Cerritos

Frank Quintero – Authority Vice Chair, Councilmember, City of Glendale and President, Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority Scott Larsen – Councilmember, City of Bellflower Frank Gurulé – Councilmember, City of Cudahy

Andy Molina – Councilmember, City of Huntington Park Daryl Hofmeyer – Vice Mayor, City of Paramount Marsha McLean – Mayor, City of Santa Clarita Maria Davila – Vice Mayor, City of South Gate Others:

Michael Kodama – Executive Director, OLDA Rory Burnett – Finance Director, City of Vernon and OLDA Ronald Bates – City Manager, City of South Gate Carol Chen – Councilmember and Authority Board Alternate, City of Cerritos Maria Cristina Quintero – Marketing Director, Michael Kodama Planning Consultants Karen Heit – Transportation Deputy/Deputy Exec. Director, OLDA Bob Huddy – Senior Transportation Planner, OLDA Denise Van Stratten – North County Coordinator, OLDA Alan Huynh – Transportation Planner, OLDA Matt Gleason - SCAG Norman Emerson – Emerson & Associates Jon Grace – Project Manager, Metro James J. McCarthy – Deputy District Director, Caltrans – Dist. 7 Trisha Murakawa – Intergovernmental Affairs Officer, OLDA Rich Macias – Director Transportation Planning, SCAG Alan Patashnick – Director Countrywide Planning, Metro Hasan Ikhrata – Executive Director, SCAG Katherine Padilla – Owner, Katherine Padilla & Associates Philip Law – Program Manager, SCAG Steve Fox – Sr. Regional Planner, SCAG Mark Hunter – Administrative Analyst, City of Santa Clarita Deborah Chankin – Director of Public Works, City of Bellflower Doug Williford – Deputy Executive Director, SCAG Art Brown – Special Assignments, OCTA Naresh Amatya – Manager, Transportation Planning, SCAG

Orangeline Development Authority January 19, 2011 Page 2

Nancy Michali – Sr. PM, AECOM Maria Shafer – Minute Secretary

ITEM 4 - PUBLIC COMMENTS City of Cerritos Councilmember and Board Chair Bruce Barrows opened public comments for those in the audience who wished to address the Authority on other than agenda items. There was no response and the public comments portion of the meeting was closed. ITEM 5 - APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 8, 2010 MEETING MOTION: City of Bellflower Councilmember Scott Larsen moved to approve the meeting minutes of the December 8, 2010 meeting, as corrected. City of Huntington Park Councilmember Andy Molina seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. ITEM 6 – APPROVAL OF WARRANT REGISTER AND TREASURER'S REPORT FOR DECEMBER 9, 2010 THROUGH JANUARY 19, 2011 MOTION: City of Bellflower Councilmember Scott Larsen moved to approve the Warrant Register and Treasurer's Report for December 9, 2010 through January 19, 2011. City of Paramount Vice Mayor Daryl Hofmeyer seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. The Chair announced Item 10 of the Agenda would be heard at this time. ITEM 10 – PRESENTATION, DISCUSSION AND ACTION: WORKING SESSION REGARDING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) PACIFIC ELECTRIC RIGHT-OF-WAY/WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH CORRIDOR PROJECT The Chair read title to the aforementioned item and called for a report from staff. Executive Director Michael Kodama introduced the item and SCAG representatives in attendance. He introduced SCAG Executive Director Hasan Ikhrata. Mr. Ikhrata presented information on the PEROW/West Santa Ana study being done at the request of the Gateway Council of Governments (COG) on behalf of OLDA. He addressed the steering committee and processes and advised the Board to work with the steering committee. SCAG Program Manager Philip Law reported on the initial screening stage and noted meetings with officials along the corridor as well as public meetings held to obtain input regarding transportation challenges, suggestions and needs to develop a "purpose and need" statement and identify alternatives. He addressed an initial screening of alternatives and reported meeting with various cities regarding station locations, desires, needs and whether the project fits the General Plans. He added that the initial screening has been completed and presented results noting the next step will be to reduce alternatives and return to each city for discussion. The item will be reviewed by the steering committee at its March 2nd meeting where a final set of alternatives will be developed and will include recommendations. Mr. Kodama thanked SCAG and introduced Bob Huddy, OLDA Senior Transportation Planner. He asked Mr. Huddy to give a brief presentation and lead the workshop.


Mr. Huddy presented an overview of what OLDA is doing. He addressed the outreach process, input received and reported the process is moving into the next phase were various alternatives will be modeled. He added the project is progressing from a general process to a specific one. Mr. Huddy presented background and purpose and addressed connectivity and the existing right-of-way corridor. He reported that ultimately, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is looking for high-performance projects. He addressed the need to remember that the OLDA project is competing for funding, needs to stay mode neutral, focus on system connectivity and that it is one of the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Measure R rail projects. Mr. Huddy reported the goal is to connect the entire corridor from Santa Clarita to Santa Ana. He addressed social connectivity and reported there is no magic formula for the number of stations. Regarding land use, Mr. Huddy noted there are many intersections and addressed grade-separated systems and limited resources. He stressed the need to look at everything with an open mind, determining what works for OLDA and whether the agency is connecting the right dots. He added it is important to consider what will best serve the people and addressed the issues of fast service, frequent service and wanting to have three to four viable locally-preferred alternatives. Ensuing discussion pertained to considering skipping stations in the study, speeds, operating costs, desiring high ridership and maintenance yards. It was noted that different technologies have different requirements. Discussion continued regarding keeping operating costs low. It was noted that the FTA will no longer cover operating costs. Further discussion pertained to obtaining information regarding MAGLEV options from Japan and other places. Ensuing discussion pertained to whether an at-grade system saves money. City of Santa Clarita Mayor Marsha McLean asked whether consideration was made regarding the safety of at-grade versus above-grade. Discussion continued regarding costs per mile, the need to obtain performance measures, doing traffic and safety studies and cost versus performance. It was noted that grade separation allows for faster speeds. Ms. Michali, AECOM Project Manager added that a risk assessment is included as part of the process. Mr. Huddy reported the FRA has issued several criteria on safety at intersections and noted now that there are three years of data. Discussion followed regarding availability of 2010 census data and working through the steering committee. Mr. Ikhrata reported the scope was written 1 ½ years ago and that no promises are being made because of the lack of money. He added through the steering committee, the agency will work with OLDA during Phase II to help secure funds. However he stated that what OLDA is asking for may not be part of the project. He added that for it to be part of the project, OLDA would need to get the Steering Committee, OCTA and Metro on board. Discussion followed regarding understanding the differences. Mr. Law reported issues that will be considered include having express stops in certain parts of the corridor and having more than one set of tracks in some sections may be


difficult due to right-of-way constraints. He added that some grade crossing may be included in the final set of recommendations and that census data is still 1 ½ years away. Ensuing discussion pertained to outline of what OLDA wants and redirecting the need to bring it up as soon as possible. It was noted that the outcome of the last outreach meeting in Huntington Park, was not satisfactory; that people were being "pushed" to give answers that staff wanted to hear, that community outreach needs to be broadened and that no presentations were given in the City of South Gate. Discussion continued regarding the importance of community outreach, returning to the scope, having limited resources, needing much more money to do things right and working better with the available resources. City of Huntington Park Councilmember Andy Molina offered assistance from his city's staff and from OLDA staff in order to help coordinate better outreach. He stated that we need to address the study collectively, combining efforts with multiple cities to bring more people together and doing more with less. City of South Gate Vice Mayor Maria Davila also wanted better outreach efforts. Mr. Ikhrata apologized to the Council Members who felt disrespected. He promised to do better in the future and expressed the desire for more resources. City of South Gate City Manager, Ron Bates reported that preliminary ridership numbers shows this to be one of the strongest transit corridors in the nation adding that the project needs to be a high priority one for the region. Mr. Ikhrata reported it is the second busiest corridor after the north east. He added there is a need to build instead of just studying and that there is no question that ridership will be high. Discussion followed regarding proceeding after recognition that the system will go past Los Angeles. Mr. Ikhrata reported that by October 2011, it will be necessary to look at the entire region. He added that the California High Speed Rail (CHSR) will be attending the next SCAG Board meeting. Ensuing discussion pertained to the next phase beyond the Central Valley corridor, needing to look at the whole corridor, teaming up OCTA and MTA to do the study right, bringing the study to the next step and the need for additional resources. OLDA Transportation Deputy/Deputy Exec. Director Karen Heit reported on funding and stated that OLDA has $240 million in Measure R funds, if that money will not be used for I-5. She addressed diminishing funds in Measure R monies due to recession and the importance of defining the project and moving forward at all costs. She added that Orange County has a different set of plans and may not be able to work on the project in tandem with Los Angeles County. Discussion followed regarding being able to do more with more money. It was noted the budget is reasonable and even though money is not available, it is a good project. Discussion continued regarding moving to the next phase, better defining the corridor and looking at right alternatives rather than emphasizing technology, meeting the goal of what


best meets the needs of the corridor and needing additional information in order to proceed to next step. The Chair reported that an initial SCAG study estimated 100,000 riders per day which gave the agencies confidence to look further into developing transit in this corridor. The study looked at quiet, grade-separated technology and he noted that every city indicated if MAGLEV did not work out, the next best technology would be considered. The Chair pointed out that one of the current study maps only showed a High Speed MAGLEV system from Santa Ana to Union Station with no stops and that the cost analysis for this option is distorted. He expressed concern that residents feel they are being forced into a technology and that the bigger picture should be taken into consideration. Ensuing discussion pertained to focusing on the corridor rather than technology, determining technology through modeling, different technologies having different ranges of operation, making sure to have correct combination of stations, serving the whole corridor or part of the corridor and taking information to the next steering committee. Discussion continued regarding including the entire corridor. City of Glendale Councilmember and Burbank Glendale Pasadena Airport President Frank Quintero stressed the importance of connection to destinations, including connection with the Bob Hope Airport. There were discussions emphasizing the need to take the time to review the information. OCTA Special Assignments and former co-chair of the SCAG PEROW/West Santa Ana Branch Steering Committee, Art Brown and OLDA Board Members stressed the importance of getting people interested and Orange County involved. Mr. Ikhrata noted the issue is not about one technology being better than another, but getting two counties to work together to get something done. The Chair noted OLDA has existed for 12 years and has kept Member Cities together and involved, even during very difficult times. Discussion followed regarding reducing to a set of alternatives rather than set of technologies. The Chair noted that cities have said speed is an issue and that not every city wants a station. He added station locations have not been defined. Ensuing discussion pertained to needing accurate ridership numbers before building and sending formal recommendations to the steering committee. Executive Director Kodama summarized the recommendations to be presented to the steering committee including consideration of speed, stations, skip stations, analysis of costs, funds capital, cost savings and safety with above-grade, unavailability of census data, coordination of outreach, environmental justice grant on under-represented cities, maps with whole corridor, considering all data, defining corridor, this level versus next level, connections to Santa Clarita and Bob Hope Airport, getting Orange County to work with OLDA, reducing set of alternatives (not technology) and the importance of speed. Discussion continued regarding risk assessment, cost savings, missing sections, availability of Measure K money, commitment of the MTA, Gateway COG and OCTA looking at sustainability and the importance of fair representation which allows more choices.


The Chair thanked SCAG representatives for their participation. MOTION: City of Santa Clarita Mayor Marsha McLean moved to direct staff to draft a letter with OLDA's recommendations to SCAG's steering committee. City of Paramount Vice Mayor Daryl Hofmeyer seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. ITEM 7 – APPROVAL OF MID-YEAR REVIEW OF OLDA BUDGET The Chair read title to the aforementioned item and called for a report from staff. Executive Director Michael Kodama presented a mid-year review of the OLDA budget highlighting changes. He reported the Bob Hope Airport will hire consultants and put up local match, which will change the OLDA budget. Other changes included looking back 2-3 years and the fact that expenditures were low. He noted there were higher legal costs which had not been anticipated. Also, he reported the earmark is expected sooner, that dues were used and activities switched to the grant. He noted another issue is the need for insurance. Discussion followed regarding putting the budget in a standard format, special assessments and using funds better. Mr. Bates stated he will work with Mr. Kodama to put the budget in a standard format. MOTION: City of Bellflower Councilmember Larsen moved to approve the mid-year review of the OLDA budget. City of Glendale Councilmember Frank Quintero seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. The Chair announced Ron Bates is moving to Pico Rivera but has asked to stay on even though he is not in a City on the corridor. He stated he feels comfortable with Mr. Bates staying on or having City Managers from Paramount or Cerritos attend meetings. Mr. Bates reported the City of Pico Rivera approved his contract last Thursday. ITEM 8 – APPROVAL TO PURCHASE OLDA INSURANCE POLICY The Chair read title to the aforementioned item and called for a report from staff. Mr. Kodama reported on requirements that need to be fulfilled including insurance for general liability and directors. He reported a quote from JPIA was for $20,000 for one year and recommended next step include purchasing $10,000 to cover the next six months. Discussion followed regarding looking at the MTA and Airport MOUs to see if OLDA has adequate coverage, and basing coverage on planning, not construction. It was noted the Airport MOU may be discussed at the next Board meeting. It was suggested to purchase the six-month policy and continue searching for a less expensive one. Suggestions also included going out to bid and also looking at commercial providers. Mr. Kodama reported the quote is based on engineering and construction so costs were high. It may also include other cost coverage not currently applicable to OLDA.


Discussion followed regarding working with other cities and agencies to get a lower rate. MOTION: City of Bellflower Councilmember Larsen moved to direct staff purchase a six-month policy and continue to work with other agencies to obtain a better rate. City of Paramount Vice Mayor Daryl Hofmeyer seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. ITEM 9 – FORM 700 FILING REMINDER FOR 2011 The Chair reminded Members to file their Form 700 for 2011. ITEM 11 – COMMUNICATION ITEMS TO THE BOARD Mr. Kodama reported the third amended JEPA will be brought to the OLDA Board to change language to include City/County of Los Angeles and Burbank Airport. He reported that OLDA submitted a letter of support for the City of Bellflower’s MTA Call for Projects Application. He reported he is working on getting someone here from Nagoya to present information on their MAGLEV system and that it will take time. In addition, he reported an NTI TOD course will take place April 27 – 28, 2011 and is free for jurisdictions. He noted OLDA staff will try to attend. The Chair will email Board members with information. Discussion followed regarding new releases about China funding high speed rail. Mr. Kodama reported Norm Emerson is working in this arena. Mr. Emerson reported it also has to do with the Department of Commerce and the State Department and they are looking at billions of dollars. He noted China was looking at Fresno and has certain procurement processes and that California has to adhere to it. He added they are in it for the long term. Mr. Kodama thanked OLDA staff for their work on the presentation and working session. ITEM 12 – COMMUNICATION ITEMS FROM THE BOARD Mr. Art Brown reported the OCTA has retained him to be on the LOSAN corridor. He reported the Japan Transportation Institute session on High Speed Rail was excellent and the big bragging point was no fatalities in all their years of operation. City of Bellflower Councilmember Larsen thanked Jon Grace for his wisdom, time and effort. Mr. Grace reported he will be working on the I-5 corridor project. Mr. Larsen expressed his appreciation to Art Brown for attending and noted he is welcomed to attend all future meetings. The Chair also expressed his appreciation to Mr. Grace for his knowledge and assistance.


Mr. Grace stated he has enjoyed the project and request a seat be saved for him on the corridor. ITEM 13 – ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. _______________________________ Secretary Attest: __________________________________ Chair Approved:

Orangeline Development Authority

Midyear Budget FY 10-11

Present Balance (January 1, 2011) 77,366.08$

Approved Mid Year Approved Mid Year

Revenues Budget 10-11 Actual Budget 10-11

Membership Dues 177,478.00$ 162,672.00$ 177,478.00$

Cerritos Transportation Land-Use Grant1

282,000.00$ -$ 56,000.00$

Airport Ground Access Study2

2,500,000.00$ -$ 125,000.00$

Caltrans South Gate Huntington Park Environmental Justice Grant3

-$ -$ 64,150.00$

Reserves4

13,000.00$

Sub-total 2,959,478.00$ 162,672.00$ 435,628.00$

Special Assessment - DLA Piper 41,070.00$ -$ 41,070.00$

Reserves 21,237.43$ -$ 8,237.43$

TOTAL 3,021,785.43$ 162,672.00$ 484,935.43$

Expenditures Budget Actual Proposed

Authority Board Activities 14,000.00$ 7,044.65$ 14,000.00$

Executive Director 60,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 60,000.00$

Other Administrative 72,000.00$ 51,679.70$ 72,000.00$

Legal 18,000.00$ 21,746.65$ 31,000.00$

Insurance -$ -$ 10,000.00$

Consultants for Cerritos Transportation-Land Use Grant1

259,208.00$ 12,500.00$ 63,000.00$

Consultants for Airport Ground Access Project2

2,400,000.00$ -$ -$

MTA Fee -$ -$ 2,800.00$

Planning, Project Mgmt & Admin5

93,870.00$ -$ 150,428.00$

Office Administration 32,400.00$ 19,647.71$ 32,400.00$

Contingency - Advocacy 10,000.00$ -$

Sub-total 2,959,478.00$ 142,618.71$ 435,628.00$

Special Assessment - DLA Piper 41,070.00$ -$ 41,070.00$

Reserves 21,237.43$ -$ 8,237.43$

TOTAL 3,021,785.43$ 142,618.71$ 484,935.43$

1 - $226,000 will be available for appropriation in FY 2011-12

2 - $2,375,000 in consultant fees will be paid direct by Burbank Glendale Pasadena

Airport Authority; $2.7 million in consultant fees and $275,000 in proj mgmt fees

will be available in FY 2011-20123 - $213,000 grant ; $64,150 will be spent this year for planning; remaining grant

will be available for appropriation in FY 2011-12 and $106,000 for SG HPk

consultants4 - Expend in FY 2010-11

5 - $44,150 will be spent this year for planning; $106,278 will be for proj mgmt and

admin from grants

High Speed Rail Seminar in California

Friday, January 14, 2011 Main Seminar 1:30 pm Reception following the Main Seminar

Omni Los Angeles Hotel at California Plaza 251 South Olive St., LA, CA 90012

Presented by: • Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), Japan

• Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA), Japan • Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), Japan

• Institution for Transport Policy Studies (ITPS), Japan • Japan International Transport Institute (JITI)

• Council for Global Promotion of Railway, Japan • Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO)

Supported by The Nippon Foundation

AGENDA

Opening Remarks Sumio Mabuchi, Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism

(Vice-Minister Masafumi Shukuri, MLIT, representing Minister Mabuchi)

Ichiro Fujisaki, Ambassador of Japan to the United States

Satoshi Seino, Acting Chairman, Council for Global Promotion of Railway and President/CEO,

East Japan Railway Company (JR East)

Kenichi Fukaya, Vice-Chairman, ITPS

Keynote Remarks Norman Y. Mineta, Former Secretary of Transportation and Vice Chairman, Hill & Knowlton, Inc.

Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, Los Angeles

U.S. Congressman Jim Costa, California 20th

District

U.S. Congresswoman Laura Richardson, California 37th

District

State Assemblymember Fiona Ma, Speaker pro tempore, California 12th

District

State Assemblymember Cathleen Galgiani, California 17th

District

State Assemblymember Warren Furutani, California 55th

District

Roelof van Ark, CEO, California High-Speed Rail Authority

Presentations Regional Developments through HSR Projects

Yuki Tanaka, Director, International Affairs Office, JITI

Operator Proposal: Realization of the HSR Project and Maximization of its Economic Impact

Satoshi Seino, President and CEO, JR East

Introduction of Safe and Efficient N700-I bullet System, and Countermeasures against Derailment during Earthquake

Tsutomu Morimura, Senior Executive Director, Central Japan Railway Company (JR Central)

Efforts to Maximize the Effects of HSR

Toshihiko Aoyagi, Director General, Railway Operations HQ, Kyushu Railway Company (JR Kyushu)

Railcar Manufacturer Proposals: High Speed Train Technology and Contributions to the US Society

Yoshinori Kanehana, Exec. Officer and VP, Rolling Stock Company, Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY

ENSURING A STRONG, DIVERSE AND SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY FOR L.A. COUNTY’S RESIDENTS AND COMMUNITIES.

Strategic Plan for Economic Development

2010-2014

Los Angeles County covers over 4,000 square miles and is the nation’s most diverse and populous county with more than 10.4 million residents representing more than 220 languages and cultures from around the world. Home to some of the world’s leading consumer markets, the largest labor force of any county in the United States, three world-class research universities and 117 other college and university campuses, the two largest seaports in America, and one of the busiest origin and destination airports anywhere, Los Angeles County has one of the world’s largest and most dynamic economies with annual economic activity in excess of $500 billion in 2008. To guide job and business retention, expansion and attraction in this nation-sized economy, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors wholeheartedly endorses this fi rst-ever, ground-up, consensus strategic plan for economic development in Los Angeles County. The Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation facilitated the creation of the plan through a series of public meetings with a diverse array of participants from education, labor, business, government, and the environmental and environmental justice communities. This distinctive group of leaders from regions throughout the County was united in their commitment to a brighter economy, a cleaner environment, and a more broadly shared prosperity. Now it’s time for all of us to come together, carry out and realize what’s contained in the “four corners” of this plan. To do so, we need champions to help implement the plan; and, there are roles for everyone in the public, private and non-profi t sectors to play. We invite local residents and the best and brightest leaders from the most creative fi rms from around the world to participate and help us reach our goals.

A MESSAGE FROM THE L.A. COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

Gloria Molina1st District

Mark Ridley-Thomas2nd District

Zev Yaroslavsky3rd District

Don Knabe4th District

Michael D. Antonovich5th District

MAKING LOS ANGELES MORE COMPETITIVE Los Angeles County and its 88 cities

have underperformed in job creation

in recent decades, due in part to the

lack of a strategic plan for economic

development to guide decision making.

There are many risks associated with

not having a proactive strategic plan

for future economic development,

including reduced quality of life, social

inequity, disinvestment and a corroding

economic environment that undermines

job growth, impairs business attraction

and retention, and depresses overall

economic well-being and wealth

creation. In the age of globalization,

a strategic plan is an essential guide

to long-term regional prosperity.

A better connected world will bring

greater demands for resources and

products and increase location options

for companies seeking a competitive

advantage. Rapid development

will unleash a fl ood of qualifi ed and

educated workers, increasing the

need for local workers to attain

higher skill levels and improve

productivity in order to maintain

and improve current living standards.

Our response to these competitive

pressures must be shaped by a clear,

comprehensive, collaborative strategy

that guides job and business retention,

expansion and attraction. Having good

quality, stable jobs is the only path to

a stronger, more sustainable economy

and a better quality of life for our

current and future residents.

INTRODUCTION

The Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation (LAEDC), a private, non-profi t public benefi t organization

with more than 200 members representing leading private sector employers in the County, two dozen academic institutions,

more than 20 cities from across L.A. County, six regional economic development corporations, the County CEO and appointed

representatives of all fi ve County Supervisors, identifi ed, assembled and mobilized a diverse group of public, private, business,

education, labor, environmental and other community-based participants to shape, build support around and help implement

the fi rst-ever comprehensive, consensus strategic plan for economic development in L.A. County.

CONSENSUS STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS

LOS ANGELES COUNTY www.LACountyStrategicPlan.com 1

The strategic planning process was con-ceived to design and build consensus around the need to implement a com-prehensive, collaborative plan for eco-nomic development to strengthen the economy, improve the environment and invigorate communities. With generous support from the Morgan Family Foun-dation, this strategic planning effort differs markedly from other outwardly similar plans in the high level of stake-holder involvement at each step of the process. The animating idea has been to develop consensus around a common vision that serves the community’s long-term interests and encourages broad community participation, engagement and ownership to help guarantee the plan’s success.

Research began with a survey of more than 5,000 businesses operating in Los Angeles County to determine the health and concerns of industry. Next, we conducted an in-depth study of major industry clusters driving the Los Angeles County economy. This was followed by a series of focus groups

with industry leaders to confi rm the needs, opportunities and growth potentialin key sectors. Then, we surveyedand cataloged best economic develop-ment planning practices and strategiesamong selected U.S. cities and counties,as well as major international cities. From these different research inputs, we identifi ed fi ve key components central to economic development success:Educated Workforce, Business-FriendlyEnvironment, Attractive Quality of Life,Smart Land Use and 21st Century Infrastructure. We prepared a “straw-man” document complete with a key aspirational goal for each compo-nent, and a series of sample objectives and strategies for meeting each goal.

Public input was a central element of the plan’s development. While the “straw-man” document served as a critical starting point, it was during 26 public workshops held across L.A. County that the plan was molded and its consensus vision was developed. We solicited input from 1,070 individual stakeholders (see back cover)

representing government, education,business, environment, non-profi ts, com-munity and labor organizations. Their feedback was used to shape, refi ne and continuously advance the general plan from an outline to a consensus-driven blueprint for economic development.

Implementation and delivery on the strategies is ultimately what will make this plan dynamic, purposeful and relevant versus one that merely “sits on the shelf.” During this phase, we will identify champions to guide imple-mentation of the plan. In particular, the champions will develop an action list of specifi c implementation tasks, decideon appropriate measurements of success and delineate performance-based timelines. Many of the stakeholders will be drawn from among the participants at the 26 public forums. We also invite the broad-er public and other key civic stakehold-ers to join us in committing to imple-ment these strategies in the years ahead to sustain and expand our region’s eco-nomic prosperity.

Los Angeles County is made

up of 88 vibrant and diverse

cities whose population of over

10.4 million would make it the

8th largest state in the United

States. As the entertainment,

manufacturing and international

trade capital of America,

and with over $500 billion in

annual economic activity spread

across these and other key areas

of expertise, L.A. County’s gross

domestic product is larger than

Taiwan or Hong Kong.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY – BUILDING ON OUR STRENGTHS

2 LOS ANGELES COUNTY Strategic Plan for Economic Development

L.A. County is most famously known

for its entertainment industry. Billions of

people around the world enjoy the fi lms,

television shows, music and new media

created here. Entertainment, in turn, is a

major draw for one of the area’s primary

imports–tourists. Each year, millions of

people fl ock to the County to visit famed

studios, enjoy the attractions, relax on

one of the region’s popular warm water

beaches and browse the chic shops along

Rodeo Drive and other famous streets in

the region.

But there is more to the County than its

sunny skies and movie stars. Los Angeles

County is also the creative capital of

the world and home to 15 dynamic

export-oriented industry clusters, ranging

from fashion and automotive design to

materials and machinery to technology,

health services and biomedical. With

120 institutions of higher learning

and an abundance of well-educated

workers, it should come as no surprise

that technology-based businesses are big

here, as are engineering, fi nancial, and

professional services. The County’s major

research universities (Caltech, UCLA and

USC) have also spawned great growth in

the life sciences, engineering and digital

technology.

Home to the nation’s largest port com-

plex, municipally-owned power utility,

and many leading export-oriented

industries transitioning to environmental

sustainability, L.A. County has also been

a leader in advancing environmental

innovation, in applying new clean tech-

nologies and products to “green” its more

established industries such as manufac-

turing and international trade, and in the

creation of green jobs, especially in the

areas of renewable energy generation, en-

ergy effi ciency and green transportation.

As the nation’s #1 gateway to the global

economy, via the Ports of Los Angeles

and Long Beach and Los Angeles

International Airport (LAX), one of the

world’s busiest origin and destination

airports, international trade is the force

behind much of the region’s vitality. The

continuous stream of goods fl owing into

and out of the region’s ports sustains other

key segments including warehousing

and logistics, materials and machinery,

and business and fi nancial services.

L.A. County has also been a leader in

advancing environmental innovation. As

the foremost market for alternative fuel

vehicles, energy effi ciency and clean air

initiatives, L.A. County offers abundant

opportunities for green growth. In fact,

California invested over $3.3 billion in

clean technologies in 2008 and ranks fi rst

in the nation in new energy patents.

With a larger consular corp than any

American city outside Washington, D.C.

and more than 220 languages and

cultures represented across the County,

Los Angeles is increasingly being

recognized as the Capital of the Pacifi c

Rim. The County’s cultural and economic

diversity, educational opportunities,

extensive infrastructure and thriving

industry clusters have created unparal-

leled opportunities for all its residents

and helped to establish L.A. County’s

growth and economic success.

Building on our strengths to ensure our

region’s continued economic health,

we believe that it is critical that we

implement this consensus strategic plan

for economic development. On the

following pages, we have identifi ed fi ve

aspirational goals and 12 objectives that

have been developed to ensure our

region’s continued success.


OBJECTIVE ONE: Ensure successful education outcomes at every level, i.e., all students should, at

a minimum, achieve grade-level profi ciency and graduate.

Connect schools and communities by

linking local community organizations,

non-profi ts, businesses and corporate

leaders with schools through formal

partnerships, and implementing family

education programs and after-school

programs.

Increase student access and engagement

by teaching and motivating parents

to be meaningfully engaged in their

children’s educational success; educating

parents and students on career oppor-

tunities and readiness requirements;

and increasing access to scholarships,

loans and grants for education.


Make schools better by tracking, assess-

ing and reporting student performance

outcomes; increasing the number of

charter schools and small schools/learn-

ing communities in schools; increasing

the use of technology at all levels;

increasing arts, language, STEM educa-

tion and preparation for employment

opportunities in key industries; improv-

ing teacher quality and accountability

through enhanced training, recruitment

and incentives; implementing multiple

pathway approaches which prepare

students from diverse backgrounds for

college, careers and entrepreneurship;

and creating and strengthening link-

ages among K-12 schools, community

colleges and universities.

Los Angeles County is home

to numerous highly-educated

workers, and businesses in the

area benefi t from an industrious,

talented and diverse workforce.

To stay competitive in the global

economy, Los Angeles County

will need to maintain and expand

its educated workforce and

entrepreneurial class. Higher

education provided by Caltech,

UCLA and USC, numerous

California State University

campuses, private universities

and colleges, and community

colleges is superb, but there

is still substantial room for

improvement in K-12 education

where student performance and

dropout rates are both major

areas of concern. The Educated

Workforce component aims to

improve educational outcomes,

align education and training

programs with business needs,

and ensure that all potential

workers are prepared to

participate in the dynamic

L.A. County economy.

I. PREPARE AN EDUCATED WORKFORCE

OBJECTIVE TWO: Ensure that businesses have enough workers with the right skill sets to meet

their needs.

Conduct and publish research on

workforce shortages, skill gaps and re-

quired profi ciencies; and evaluate exist-

ing education, training and placement

programs for continuous improvement.

Fund workforce intermediaries to bring

together stakeholders in targeted

industry sectors to address existing and

projected future workforce gaps by

facilitating more opportunities for

public-private collaboration between

individual businesses, community col-

leges and universities, and promoting

industry-driven curricula and technical

education based on employer-recog-

nized certifi cation.

Integrate workforce training activities

and higher education (from entry to

college/university-based to enhanced

professional education) to create

seamless career pathways leading to

high-value jobs in target industries (e.g.,

aerospace engineers).

Expand customized, sector-based pro-

grams to train larger numbers of people

and market them better to job seekers.

Retain and attract highly-skilled workers

and develop the next generation of

managerial talent.

Co-locate public services such as

WorkSource/OneSource centers on

college campuses.

OBJECTIVE THREE: Prepare job seekers and incumbent workers to enter sectors with high-value

jobs – as measured by wages, benefi ts and additional income attracted into

the County – and built-in career ladders.

Create programs that expand the

workforce by reconnecting high school

dropouts to educational and training

opportunities.

Develop, expand and upgrade the

skills of the existing workforce.

Begin career awareness programs in

middle school. Offer student internships,

job shadowing, apprenticeships, con-

current enrollment programs, soft skills

training, improved career counseling,

youth employment and more parent

education on careers to provide students

with career awareness and work

experience.



Los Angeles County is a great

place to do business, but so are

many other locations. In today’s

globally competitive economy

where businesses have fl exibility

in their location decisions, Los

Angeles must be as welcoming as

possible to businesses of all sizes.

All fi rms, and particularly smaller

ones with fewer resources, need

to be able to focus their energies

on serving their customers rather

than interacting with government.

Being business-friendly means:

state, county and city governments

are customer-driven in their

interactions with businesses;

government processes are rational,

predictable, understandable

and timely; and public and

private economic development

agencies help businesses thrive

and create good quality jobs.OBJECTIVE ONE: Establish and promote a business-friendly environment to create and retain

good quality jobs.

Facilitate private sector job creation by

helping the state of California, L.A. County,

and our 88 cities develop for their

business-facing activities more effi cient

processes, more affordable pricing and

a stronger customer service ethic.

Adopt clear, reasonable and predict-

able processes for the development

of land to facilitate job creation and

implement policies, plans and

procedures to streamline review and

approval processes.

Educate local and statewide stakeholders

on the value of private sector businesses

as generators of jobs, tax revenue and

regional prosperity, and encourage

government offi cials to evaluate the

economic impact of regulations and

policies that affect overall competitive-

ness and to play a more active role in

courting private sector employers.

Create a sample template and encour-

age cities to include an economic devel-

opment element in their general plans;

then, encourage L.A. County and our 88

cities to update their economic develop-

ment elements regularly.

II. CREATE A BUSINESS-FRIENDLY ENVIRONMENT

© Ken Pagliaro

OBJECTIVE TWO: Retain and expand the existing job base while pro-actively attracting new

businesses, industries, jobs and investment.

Develop and promote a compelling,

consistent value proposition and

brand for L.A. County, incorporating

existing and aspirational strengths

(e.g., size, diversity, creativity, climate,

culture and commitment to green).

Increase proactive outreach to help

retain and expand businesses of all

sizes, with emphasis on those that are

at risk of closing, leaving or being

wooed away.

Align local and statewide tax incentive

policies with local and regional

economic development priorities.

Develop sector-specifi c value propo-

sitions and strategies to attract fi rms

including incentives for businesses

seeking to capitalize on opportunities

created by the greening of the local,

state and world economies.

Create employment and business

opportunities for local fi rms by

supporting the development of interna-

tional trade, tourism, and by promoting

Los Angeles County as a destination for

foreign direct investment.

Ensure access to capital by expanding

outreach and marketing efforts to

capital sources and attracting capital

investors and lenders for all stages of

development; exploring creative new

sources of capital such as the EB-5

Immigrant Investor Program; and creat-

ing and augmenting channels/networks

to connect capital to entrepreneurs, with

emphasis on small, minority or women-

owned businesses.

OBJECTIVE THREE: Leverage the County’s research and development facilities for the commercial-

ization of research, technology and similar opportunities.

Aggressively seek more research fund-

ing and activity for L.A. County-based

institutions.

Create a more supportive infrastructure

and stronger networks to facilitate the

commercialization of local research

and provide needed services to

entrepreneurs (venture capital, research

parks, entrepreneurial management

teams and mentors, etc.), focusing in

particular on industries where L.A.

County holds a competitive advantage

(e.g., port tech, digital media, entertain-

ment technology, etc.).



Quality of life is important to

everyone. We all want safe

neighborhoods, improved

mobility, plentiful and affordable

housing, clean air and water, and

healthy, vibrant communities.

A high quality of life also includes

promoting social equity to

ensure all residents in Los Angeles

County have an opportunity to

live a healthy life as full participants

in the larger community. From an

economic development standpoint,

quality of life is critical to a

healthy and productive workforce.

Moreover, many businesses

and workers have options

about where to locate, and a

healthy environment and high

quality of life can help attract

and retain them.

III. ENHANCE OUR QUALITY OF LIFE

OBJECTIVE ONE: Make our communities more desirable places to live.

Ensure public safety by supporting

programs that reduce crime (such as

Business Watch, Neighborhood Watch,

volunteer patrols, anti-gang programs

and rapid response to “broken window”

problems).

Improve mobility and reduce traffi c

congestion and its environmental im-

pacts by employing technology and

traffi c management strategies to reduce

demand and optimize system effi ciency;

making transit easier and more desirable

to use; improving walkability and

bicycling; encouraging transit-oriented

development and densifi cation where

appropriate; offering incentives for

carpooling and transit; and improving the

jobs/housing balance.

Remove obstacles and create incentives

to encourage the construction of a large

quantity and wide range of housing

of all types (i.e., condos, apartments,

townhouses, single-family homes, etc.),

with a particular emphasis on adding

affordable and workforce housing units.

Promote healthy living by building more

parks and expanding recreational ac-

tivities, and encouraging healthy living

through active lifestyles, wellness pro-

grams and locally-sourced nutritious

food supplies (e.g., community gardens

and farmers markets).

Encourage and expand cultural and

artistic amenities that celebrate our diver-

sity and attract local and global patrons.

Create healthy, vibrant and strong

communities by balancing land use,

transportation, economic development,

housing and environmental improve-

ment objectives.

OBJECTIVE TWO: Use all available resources (i.e., Hope VI funding, etc.) and adopt new approaches

to revitalize low-income communities.

Increase community participation in

the planning and jobs creation process.

Use smart growth principles to

economically integrate communities,

maximize the creation of new afford-

able and workforce housing units, and

create more open space for residents.


In today’s global economy, the places that attract and retain talent will win, and those who don’t will lose.”

“

–Richard Florida, Author of The Flight of the Creative Class.


Los Angeles County must

preserve an adequate supply

of jobs-creating land so that

current residents and their

children will have a place to

work and earn a decent living.

The population density

in the County is among the

highest in the nation, placing a

premium on the effi cient use

of the limited supply of land,

particularly in urban areas.

Smart land use provides

adequate space for both

employment uses and housing

through strategies such as

by-right development, infi ll

development, redevelopment,

and reuse of obsolete

industrial land.

OBJECTIVE ONE: Maintain an adequate supply of jobs-creating land.

Create and maintain a database of

County-wide, jobs-creating land to

facilitate the retention and expansion of

local companies as well as the attraction

of new companies to the County.

Implement an employment land

preservation policy that restricts re-

zoning of industrially-zoned land to other

uses without formal consideration and

recognition of: the need for adequate

buffering between industrial land and

incompatible uses; how and where

that industrial land will be replaced

elsewhere in the County; whether the

proposed change-of-use development

will increase land values of surrounding

industrial land and/or encroach on

nearby viable industries; and whether

the new use will produce more high-

value jobs than alternative industrial uses.

Make better use of the public sector’s

real estate portfolio to facilitate jobs-

producing projects.

Reserve employment land (existing and

vacant) for research and development

uses, especially land located near

research institutions and universities,

using strategies such as creating com-

munity land trusts, land banking, and/

or through the creation of business,

industrial, manufacturing or research and

development zones.

IV. IMPLEMENT SMART LAND USE

OBJECTIVE TWO: Develop and rehabilitate land to meet strategic economic development objectives.

Update general, community and specifi c

plans to enable by-right development

and rectify weaknesses in the existing

zoning classifi cations and remedy the

reactive, case-by-case, spot zoning

approach focused on individual parcels.

Develop, adopt and implement an

incentive program to retain commercial

and industrial activities and revitalize

obsolete industrial land.

Create and promote public/private

collaboration programs to facilitate

infi ll development and redevelopment

of brownfi eld sites, underutilized in-

dustrial and commercial properties

and functionally obsolete buildings.

Collaborate on securing state and

federal grants, other public fi nancing

vehicles, and tax incentive programs

such as the establishment, renewal,

implementation, management and/or

expansion of Enterprise Zones, Recycling

Market Development Zones, Business

Improvement Zones, Redevelopment

Agencies, as well as other innovative

programs that facilitate community

development and rehabilitation.

Reform the California Environmental

Quality Act (CEQA) to eliminate

abusive uses of the statute for non-envi-

ronmental purposes, such as an existing

business seeking to block competitors.


OBJECTIVE ONE: Fix the broken infrastructure development process.


OBJECTIVE TWO: Build and maintain critical infrastructure for L.A. County.

Expedite green growth at the Ports

of L.A. and Long Beach by speeding

implementation of the Clean Air Action

Plan, developing and deploying locally-

sourced and driven green technology

solutions, and adding infrastructure to

shift container traffi c from road to rail or

other cleaner modes.

Restore the balance between local and

regional interests in considering approval

of infrastructure projects.

Promote enabling legislation allowing for

best practices (e.g., design/build, public-

private partnerships, and performance

World-class infrastructure,

notably the freeways, ports,

airport and water system,

underpinned the rise of the

Los Angeles County economy

to the 19th largest in the

world, ranking it ahead of

Taiwan. The key infrastructure

investments were made a

generation or more ago and

have served the County well.

To maintain its competitive

edge in today’s global

economy, the region must

fi x the infrastructure

development process

and invest in upgrading its

critical infrastructure.

V. BUILD 21ST CENTURY INFRASTRUCTURE

contracting) to expedite infrastructure

development.

Advocate for our fair share of public infra-

structure dollars and support programs that

create opportunities for local contractors

from under-served communities.

Modernize Los Angeles International

Airport by improving domestic and

international terminals, airfi eld safety

and effi ciency, passenger experience and

accessibility into and out of LAX, while

also encouraging the further develop-

ment and improvement of other airports

throughout Southern California.

© Photograph courtesy of Metro. © 2009 LACMTA

community/company buses), improving

highway and road capacity, and investing

in goods movement infrastructure (such

as truck lanes, near-dock intermodal

rail yards, and grade-separated rail

corridors).

Improve waste-handling capabilities

by expanding recycling efforts, fi nding

environmentally-friendly means of dis-

posal for non-recyclables, and upgrad-

ing the region’s sewage treatment sys-

tem, while reducing the waste stream

to landfi lls by encouraging the use of

locally-manufactured products that are

recyclable, have long life cycles and use

less packaging.

Support public and private efforts to

continuously improve wired and wire-

less communications networks in the

County to match or exceed the highest

global standards for speed and reliability.

Ensure a reliable supply of clean and

affordable energy by encouraging green

energy production from public and

private sources, building necessary

transmission lines to access clean

energy, improving network effi ciency

and reducing demand (e.g., through

energy effi ciency programs).

Ensure a reliable supply of clean and

affordable water by implementing

strategies such as urban water con-

servation, local stormwater capture,

water recycling, and groundwater

storage while also pursuing an

environmentally-sound solution for the

Sacramento Delta that protects Southern

California water supplies.

Create a world-class ground trans-

portation network by expanding and

improving the quality and user

appeal of mass transit and alternative

modes (such as bike paths/lanes and


PARTICIPANTS IN PUBLIC WORKSHOP PROCESS

LOS ANGELES COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION444 SOUTH FLOWER STREET 34TH FLOOR LOS ANGELES CA 90071

TEL: 213.622.4300 ◆ 888. 4.LAEDC.1 ◆ FAX: 213.622.7100 ◆ www.LAEDC.org

1st Century Bank •1st Key Construction Company • 1st PMF Bancorp/China Mart • A3K Consulting • AAE, Inc. • Ability First • ABL Inc. • Accenture • ACE Capital Group • ACE Clearwater • ACT-1 Group • AECOM • Affordable Marketing Solutions • AFSCME Local 2712 • AFTRA* • Agile1 • Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority* • Alfred Mann Foundation* • Alfred Mann Institute* • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP • Alston & Bird LLP • Altoon + Porter Architects, LLP • American Airlines • American Business Bank • American Red Cross • American Tax Incentives • Andazola’s Framing Gallery • Andrews International • Antelope Valley AQMD • Antelope Valley Federal Credit Union • Antelope Valley Press • Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency • Anthem Blue Cross • Antioch University • Apparel News Group* • Aerospace Dynamics • Artilient • Asian American Economic Development Enterprises • Assemblymember Feuer’s Offi ce • Assemblywoman Runner • AT&T • Atkinson & Associates • Aurora Development • Automobile Club of Southern California • AV Equipment • Avalon Business & Career Center • AVBOT • Axsium Group • Baldwin Hills Conservancy • Bank of America • Barrister Executive Suites, Inc. • Beacon Economics • Beacon Management Group • Bear Stearns & Co.* • Berliner & Associates* • Best Best & Krieger LLP • Beverly Hills/Greater L.A. Association of Realtors • Bingham McCutchen* • Bishop Associates • BKM Offi ce Environments • BNSF Railway Company • BNY Mellon • Board of Public Works • Bob Hope Airport • Bolton & Company • Brandow & Johnston • Brek Manufacturing Company • British American Business Council • Brotman Medical Center • Brown Hotel Group • Bruce B. Hailstone Real Estate • Buchalter Nemer* • Building Industry Association • Burlington Northern Santa Fe* • Burrtec Waste • Butterfi eld Communications, Inc • CA Conservation Corp • CA District Attorneys Association • CA-CTP • California Association for Local Economic Development • California Coast Venture Forum* • California Community Foundation • California Fashion Association* • California Film Commission* • California Institute for Nursing and Health Care* • California Institute of Technology* • California Green Solutions • California Manufacturing Technology Consulting • California National Bank* • California Space Authority • California State Assembly • California State University, Dominguez Hills • California State University, L.A. • California State University, Northridge • California United Bank • Cameron Smyth’s Offi ce • Canoga Park H.S. • Capital Consultants • CapitalStack • Career Partners • Carson Chamber • Cathay Bank • CB Richard Ellis Inc. • CCD • CCE • Central City Association and Downtown Center Business Improvement District • Century Housing Corporation • Cerra Enterprises • Cerritos College • Challenge-It-Now • Chapman Communications • Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science • Chief Executive Offi ce - L.A. County • Child and Family Center • Chinatown Service Center • Chinatown WorkSource Center • China West LLC* • CIM Group • Cisco Brothers* • Citi Smith Barney • Citrus College • Citrus Valley Association of Realtors • City National Bank* • City of Arcadia • City of Azusa • City of Baldwin Park • City of Bellfl ower • City of Beverly Hills • City of Burbank • City of California City • City of Carson • City of Cerritos • City of Claremont • City of Commerce • City of Compton • City of Covina • City of Culver City • City of Diamond Bar • City of Downey • City of Duarte • City of El Monte • City of El Segundo • City of Gardena • City of Glendale • City of Hope* • City of Huntington Park • City of Inglewood • City of Irwindale • City of La Mirada • City of Lakewood • City of Lancaster • City of Lomita • City of Long Beach • City of Los Angeles • City of Lynwood • City of Maywood • City of Monrovia • City of Montebello • City of Monterey Park • City of Norwalk • City of Palmdale • City of Paramount • City of Pasadena • City of Pico Rivera • City of Pomona • City of Redondo Beach • City of Rolling Hills Estates • City of Rosemead • City of Santa Clarita • City of Santa Fe Springs • City of Santa Monica • City of Signal Hill • City of South Gate • City of Temple City • City of Torrance • City of Vernon • City of Walnut • City of West Covina • City of Whittier • CKG Communications • Classic Billing* • CLC Tax Credits • Clean Energy Advocates, Inc. • CMTC • CMTS Construction Management* • Coalition for a Safe Environment • College of the Canyons • College of the Canyons Foundation • Coldwell Private Company Commercial/Valley Realty • Colliers International • COM DEV • Common Ground/StoreFront Cultural Centers • Communities for a Better Environment • Communities for Clean Ports/End Oil • Community Advancement & Business Training Center • Community Career Development , Inc • Community Education, COC • Compton Unifi ed School District ROP/CTG • Con Sabor Restaurant • Consensus, Inc. • Consulate General of Sweden • Continental Development • COPE Health Solutions* • Cordoba Corporation • Counselor SBDC Peatroy • Countrywide Home Loans • County of L.A. Board of Supervisors • County of San Bernardino WIB • Courtyard by Marriott L.A. Westside • Courtyard by Marriott-Palmdale • Cox, Castle & Nicholson LLP • CRA/LA • CSA • Culver City Yellow Cab Company • Current Agency • Daisy Swan & Associates • DBS Bank Ltd. L.A. Agency • Dean, PE • Delio Insurance - Signal Hill • Deloitte • Department of Regional Planning-L.A. County Department of Water and Power City of L.A. • Diagramix Inc. • Directors Guild of America* • DLA Piper US LLP • DMJM H&N* • DxTerity Diagnostics* • East West Bank • Economics and Politics Inc.* • EDD • Edward Jones Investments • Edwards FCU • Eichleay Engineers Inc. of Southern California* • El Camino College Business Training Center • El Centro de Amistad • El Monte Community Redevelopment Agency • Employment Development Department • Employment Training Panel • energyevolutions.net • Enright Industrial Realty • Enright Premier Wealth Advisors • Entretech* • esi Techtrans, Inc. • ETI • Farmers Insurance Group of Companies • FedEx • FIDM* • First American Title Insurance Co. • First Regional Bank • Flanigan Farms, Inc • Foley & Lardner LLP • Forest Lawn Memorial Park & Mortuaries • Forever 21 • Form and Function • Foundation for Pierce College • Fowler & Bush • Fresh & Easy • Friends of the L.A. River • FuturePorts* • GAIN • Gaines & Stacey LLP Gardena Valley Chamber • Greater Antelope Valley Economic Alliance • GC COG • George Chevrolet • George Deukmejian • George Elkins Mortgage Private Company • George Runners Offi ce • GH20 Solutions • Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP • Giovinezza Cosmetic Co.* • gkkworks • GKM Ventures* • Glendale Community College • Glendora Chamber of Commerce • Global Commercial Banking • Goodwill of Orange County • Goodwill of San Diego • Goodwill of Southern California • Goodwill of Long Beach • Green LA Coalition • Greif & Co. • Grubb and Ellis Company • Gumbiner Savett Inc. • Grumpy Old Men • Halcrow* • Haney and Company • Harbor Connections • Hedman and Associates • Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum (HOK)* • Hershey|Cause • Hibbs, Richard S., CPA • High Desert Green Jobs Initiative • Holiday Inn • Holland and Knight LLP • Holliday Fenoglio Fowler • Hollywood Chamber of Commerce • Honeywell • Horizon Institute • Hospital Association of Southern California • Housing Authority-City of L.A. • IBEW Local 11 • IBM • ICG Advisors, LLC • Icon Blue, Inc. • Independent Cities Association • Industrial Council Chamber of Commerce • Infrastructure Academy • International Consulting • International Trade Education Programs, Inc.* • Ironworkers 433 • Isenberg de Herrera* • IS West • Jacobs Engineering Group • James Suhr and Associates, LLC • Japan Business Association • Jenner & Block, LLP • Jenny Oropeza Offi ce • Jewish Vocational Services • Johnson Controls • Jones Day • Jones Lang LaSalle • JSB Development • JUS • Kaiser Permanente • Karen Kane Inc* • Kelly Services • Kennedy Jenks* • Ken Spiker & Associates • KH Consulting Group • King Industrial Products Inc. • Koontz Hardware-WEC • Korn Ferry International • Kyoto Grand Hotel and Gardens • LA Alliance for a New Economy • LA Apollo Alliance, SCOPE • L.A. Care Health Plan* • L.A. Community Development Commission • L.A. Convention Center • L.A. County Dept. Public Works • L.A. County Fed • L.A. Dental Day Spa • LA Housing Commission • Lakeside Medical Group* • La Quinta Inn and Suites • L.A. Trade-Technical College • L.A. Works • LA/OC Regional Consortium • Lachoff, Kevin/Grubb and Ellis Company • LAEDC • Lakewood Attorney • Lakewood Chamber of Commerce • Lancaster Community Hospital • Lasting Impression Promotional Products • Latham & Watkins, LLP • LAUSD • LAVC Job Training • Law Offi ces of Anita C. Willis • Law Offi ces of Chris Ingram • Law Offi ces of Dominick W. Rubalcava • LAXTEC Corporation • LCA Consultancy League of California Cities • Lee & Associates • Leo A Daly* • Lockton Insurance Brokers, LLC* • Long Beach Chamber of Commerce • Long Beach City College • Los Angeles County Business Federation • L.A. Air Force Base • L.A. Area Chamber of Commerce • L.A. Athletic Club • L.A. Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center • L.A. Business Journal • L.A. CITY WIB • L.A. County Department of Regional Planning • L.A. County Metropolitan Transit Authority* • L.A. County Offi ce of Small Business • L.A. County Recycling Market Development Zone • L.A. Health Action* • L.A. Health Care Workforce Dev Program* • L.A. Jobs Corps • L.A. LDC • L.A. South Bay Workforce Services Offi ce • L.A. Southwest College • L.A. Sports Council • L.A. Urban League Business & Career Center • L.A. Urban League Business & Career WorkSource Center • L.A.-Ventura Workforce Services • L.A. World Airports* • Lowe Enterprises, Inc. • Loyola Marymount University • Lundgren Management • M.E.N.D. • Macerich Corporation • Majestic Realty Co. • Maleman Ink • Malibu Chamber of Commerce • Manhattan Bank • MannKind Corp.* • Mar Ventures • Marsh Risk & Insurance Services • Maureen A. Kindel • Maurice J. Sopp & Son Chevrolet • McKenna Long & Aldridge, LLP • Melendrez Associates* • Mellady Direct Mail Marketing • Mercury Air Group, Inc. • Metlife Real Estate Investments • Metropolitan Transportation Authority • Metropolitan Water District of Southern California • Metropolitan West Capital Management, LLC • Microsoft Corporation • Miller, Ward & Company • Mission Valley Bank • Mister Parliamentarian • Miyamoto International, Inc. • Money Sense • More than Shelter Services, Inc. • Morgan Samuels Company • Mount San Antonio College • MS Consulting • MWW Group • MYMWI • NAI Capital • Navigant Consulting • NAWBO-LA • NBBJ* • NBC Universal • Network Public Affairs* • New West Partners Inc.* • New York Life Insurance Company • Newhall Land • Newhall Redevelopment Committee • New Market Careers • Nixon Peabody LLP • Nochebuena R&D • Northgate Gonzales Markets • Northrop Grumman Corporation • Norwalk Chamber • Oakwood Corporate Housing • Oasis • Occidental Petroleum Corp. • Octagon Business Solutions • Offi ce of Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa • Offi ce of Tech Transfer, Caltech* • Offi ce of the Speaker of the Assembly, Karen Bass • O’Melveny & Myers • ONEgeneration • Otis College of Art and Design* • Painters & Allied Trades DC 36 • Palmdale Chamber of Commerce • Palmdale Water District • Palmer Investment, Inc. • Paramount Pictures • Pardee Homes • Parson Corporation • Pasadena Bioscience Collaborative* • Pasadena Chamber of Commerce • Passantino Anderson Communications • Pat Brown Institute • Paydel & Rygel* • PB - Parsons Brinckerhoff • Peace From Within You • Peatroy Demolition • PGLA • Phoenix Realty Group • Plains All American Pipeline L.P. / Pacifi c L.A. Marine Terminal LLC • Planning Company Associates, Inc. • Plaza Property Group • Poole & Shaffery, LLP • Port of Long Beach* • Port of L.A. • Pratt and Whitney • Pricewaterhouse Coopers • Primstor Pro Education Group • Project GRAD LA • PROMERICA Bank • Property Partners • Providence Health and Services Southern California Region • Psomas • Public Private Ventures, Inc. • PUJOBS • Purpose Focused Alternative Learning Group • R.C.I. Inc. • Radlink* •Ralphs Grocery Company • Ramsey-Shilling Commercial Real Estate Services • Rancho Vista Development • READI, LLC • Reelz Channel* • Reinforcing Ironworkers 416 • Regional Chamber of Commerce-SGV • REMAX • REMAX Commercial Investment Realty • Residence Inn by Marriott • Rhythm & Hues Studios* • Rio Hondo College • Riordan, John Plumbing-Heating, Inc. • RJS Legal & Business Consulting • RNL • Roosevelt High School Alumni Foundation • Rose & Kindel • Rose Hills Company • Rosenheim & Associates • Rotary Club of Van Nuys • R. R. Essen & Co.* • RSJ/Swenson • Sadovnick Partners / Corp Shorts • Sage Strategies • Salem Partners* • San Fernando Valley Business Journal • San Gabriel Valley Economic Partnership • Sanitation Districts of L.A. County • Santa Clarita Performing Arts Center at College • Santa Monica Community College • SASSFA Workforce Center • Saugus School District • SBACC • SBCCOG • SBEDP • SBWIB • SCAQMD • SCE/Public Affairs • Schmitz and Associates, Inc. • Scott Wyant, Information Systems Analysis & Design • Screen Actors Guild • SEIU 721 • SELACO WIB • SELF • Sempra Energy Utilities • Sen. Lowenthal’s Offi ce • Seyfarth Shaw LLP • Shell Oil Company • Sidley Austin LLP • Sierra Club • Silverlake Neighborhood Council • Single Mother’s Outreach • Six Flags Magic Mountain • Small Business Development Center • Small Business Organization • Smith Barney • Snak King Corporation • Snyder Langston • Society of Industrial and Offi ce Realtors, Greater L.A. Chapter • Sony Pictures Entertainment • Sotheby’s International Realty • South Bay One Stop Career Center • South Bay Workforce Investment Board • South El Monte Chamber of Commerce • South Valley WorkSource Center • Southeast County GAIN Region VI • Southern California Biomedical Council • Southern California Gas Company • Southland Motor Car Dealer Assn • Southland Partnership Corporation • Spirit Holding, Inc. • Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, LLP • SRDC L.I.T.E. • State Controller’s Offi ce • State Farm Insurance Companies • State of California-Labor Market Division • State Senator Ashburn • State Senator Runner • Stern Brothers & Co. • Stonebridge Holdings, Inc. • Stonefi eld Josephson Inc* • Strategic Links* • Students Run L.A. • Studio e Valencia • Summit West Management • Supervisor Antonovich • Sustainability Consultant • SVC Chamber of Commerce • SW Consulting Service • SWI Group of Companies • Sylmar High School • Symbion Research International, Inc.* • T.E. Lasser & Associates • Teamsters Local 396 • Tejon Ranch • TELACU Community Capital • Telepacifi c Communications • Television Alliance * • Tenet Health System* • The Boeing Company * • The Fashion District/Business Improvement District* • The “People” Project Person • The Bedford Group • The Cabinet • The Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising • The Gas Company • The Green Hive • The Home Depot • The Next Level Educational - Real Estate Investing • The Polaris Group • The Ratkovich Company • The Rogers Group • The Rug Wharehouse • The Signal • The Somerset Group • The Valley Economic Alliance • The Walt Disney Com-pany • Thomas Decker • Thrive Financial Alliance • Time Warner Cable • Tool Shed Group • Torrance Memorial Medical Center * • Torti Gallas* • Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.* • Transwestern Commercial Services • Trevear Holdings, LLC • TriCal Construction, Inc. • Tri-Cities ROP • Turner Construction Company • UA Plumbers Local Union • UAW Region 5 • UBS Financial Services Inc.* • University of California Los Angeles • Ultraglas • Unifi ed Grocers, Inc. • Union Bank • Union Pacifi c Railroad • Union Private Company • Unite L.A. • United Chambers of Commerce of the San Fernando Valley • United Way of Greater L.A. • Unite Here Local 11 • University of Southern California • Univision Communications, Inc. • UPS, Pacifi c Region* • Urban Insight Inc. • Urban Land Institute - L.A. • Urban League L.A. • Urban Strategies • US Vets • USC * • USC Stevens Institute for Innovation* • Valencia Acura • Valley Industry & Commerce Association • Valley Presbyterian Hospital * • Vamontica • Venice Community Housing Corp. • Verdugo Jobs Center • Verdugo WIB • Verizon • Vernon Chamber of Commerce • VIA • Vons-a Safeway Company • Wachovia Corporation • Walsh, Delaney & Yep, LLP • Waste Management • Watson Land Company • Wave2 Communications • Webcor Builders* • Wells Fargo • West Coast Env. + Eng • West Enterprises • West L.A. Business Team • West L.A. Chamber of Commerce • Western University of Health Sciences • Westfi eld Center • Westside Economic Collaborative • Westridge Associate* • WET Design • Wildcat Industries • Woodbury University • Woodside Natural Gas • Workplace Hollywood • World Trade Week Executive Committee • World Wide Cultural Exchange • YMCA • 1 800 Junk

*Participants of the focus group meetings for the strategic planning process.

OLDA Board Mtg Agenda 02-9-11 Final -...

Documents

Transcript of OLDA Board Mtg Agenda 02-9-11 Final -...