Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

32
Economic Potential for the Utica Shale Development in Ohio The Economic Potential for The Utica Shale Development in Ohio Cleveland State University The Ohio State University Marietta College Sponsored by: The Ohio Shale Coalition

Transcript of Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Page 1: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

The Economic Potential

for The Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

Cleveland State University

The Ohio State University

Marietta College

Sponsored by:

The Ohio Shale Coalition

Page 2: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

The Study Team

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

2

Iryna Lendel, Ph.D. Center for Economic Development, College of Urban Affairs,

Cleveland State University

Andrew R. Thomas, Esq. Energy Policy Center, College of Urban Affairs, Cleveland

State University

Edward W. Hill, Ph.D. Dean, College of Urban Affairs, Cleveland State University

Robert Chase, Ph.D. Department Chair – Petroleum Engineering and Geology,

Marietta College

Doug Southgate, Ph.D. Professor Department of Agricultural, Environmental and

Development Economics, The Ohio State University

Page 3: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Scope and Nature of Study

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

3

o Scope of Study

o Utica Shale only

o Upstream and Midstream

o 2011-2014

o Data Limitations

o No production data was available

o Relied on industry projections

o Used conservative estimates

o Designed for later iterations as data becomes

available.

Page 4: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

The Shale Gale

o World-wide shale development:

o Surge in NG, NGL supplies

o Transformation from coal to natural gas

o Transformation from oil to natural gas

o Geopolitical shift of wealth

o Away from Middle East, OPEC, Russia

o Toward N. America, Western Europe, China

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

4

Page 5: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

World Shale Formations

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

5

Page 6: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Utica Shale Reserve Projections

o 5 Billion barrels of oil recoverable o Light, sweet crude – API index of 41 – highest quality

o 15 Trillion cubic feet of gas recoverable

o Source: Larry Wickstrom, Chief Geologist, Ohio

Geological Survey

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

6

Page 7: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

The Utica and Marcellus Shale Regions

of Ohio

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

7

Page 8: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Utica Shale Economic Development

Areas Modeled

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

8

o Leasing of Mineral Rights

o Road Construction/Site Preparation

o Drilling and Completion Services

o Post Production Infrastructure Build Out

Not Modeled:

o Downstream opportunities

o Midstream oil infrastructure

o Effects Utica Shale may have on natural gas prices,

and resulting impact on manufacturing

Page 9: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Key Assumptions Made

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

9

o Production and drilling projections.

o Spending on lease bonuses and royalties, and

percent entering Ohio economy.

o Spending on road improvements, and percent

staying in Ohio.

o Spending on drilling and completion service

related work, and percent staying in Ohio.

o Spending on post-production infrastructure, and

percent staying in Ohio.

Page 10: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Important Considerations

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

10

(1) Hydrocarbons produced from Utica Shale will be

very different from that produced from the

Marcellus Shale;

(2) Operations in Ohio will be undertaken by major oil

and gas production companies for near term;

(3) The proximity of a skilled workforce from the

Marcellus Shale development in Pennsylvania and

in West Virginia may affect job development in

Ohio; and

(4) The current post-production infrastructure in Ohio

is insufficient to handle the anticipated

hydrocarbon throughput likely to be generated from

the Utica Shale development.

Page 11: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

11

Page 12: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Anticipated Production per Well

(at the well head)

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

12

Page 13: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Anticipated Number of Wells Drilled

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

13

Page 14: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Data Assumptions

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

14

o Number of wells for projecting the cost of drilling

o Number of pads for pre-drilling roads

improvements and gathering lines

o Throughput of product for royalties

o Expected throughput by 2014 for midstream

infrastructure

For each type of expenditure an estimate was

made of the share of expenditures likely to be

made in Ohio

Page 15: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Projections for Drilling and Production

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

15

o The Study Team considered several scenarios

of production and drilling

o The modeling was based on the average

scenario both for number of wells and

production per well

o We used a projected decline curve for gas and

liquids

o We assumed a 98% “success rate” for shale

drilling

Page 16: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Data Assumptions

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

16

o Drilling and Completion

o $5.75 million per well

o 58% of labor and material from Ohio, improving to 70%

in 2014

o Post production infrastructure build out

o Gathering pipelines – over $1 mm/mile

o Compressors – over $300,000 each

o Processing plants – $400,000/mmcfd

o Fractionation plants – 36 Mbbl/d – $100 mm

o Storage facilities – 1BCFD – $120 mm

o Railroad terminals – 1 BDFD – $40 mm

Page 17: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Processing Plants

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

17

Page 18: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Data Assumptions Made (Continued)

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

18

o Road Improvements: $1.1 million per well site.

o Wells per pad ratio growing from 1.52 to 2.5

o 90% Ohio labor and materials

o Lease Bonuses: $2500/acre

o 1 million acres in 2012; 500,000 acres in 2014

o 70% leases owned by Ohio private citizens

o 4% of money goes into Ohio economy once

o Royalties: 15%

o $65/bbl; $3.60/mcf

o 70% leases owned by Ohio private citizens

o 4% of money goes into Ohio economy annually

Page 19: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Conservative Nature of Estimates

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

19

o Projected engagement of Ohio-based services in

drilling and completion: 30% will go outside of Ohio

in 2014.

o Price of hydrocarbons: $65/bbl and $3.60/mcf.

o Lease bonuses and royalty payments: o 20% of owners live outside of Ohio.

o 10% is owned by municipalities and companies.

o 4% of windfall payments are spent in Ohio; bonuses one

time, royalties annually.

o Omit spending by outside workers.

Page 20: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Projected Spending in Ohio – 2014 (model input data in 2012$)

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

20

o Lease Bonuses

o $34,992,551

o Royalties

o $45,278,948

o Road & Bridge Construction

o $426,915,817

o Drilling and Completing Wells

o $4,722,240,422

o Midstream Infrastructure

o $1,138,004,105

o Total: $6,367,431,844

Page 21: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Model and Methodology

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

21

o Used “Input-Output” methodology

o IMPLAN software

o Calculates economic impact from:

o Direct Spending – purchase of goods and services

o Indirect Spending – spending of suppliers

o Induced Spending – consumer spending of labor

income

o “Regional multipliers” and “Leakages” are

determined from the model.

Page 22: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Modeling Results:

Impacts from 2011 to 2014

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

22

o Total Output: $17.4 billion (2012 dollars)

o Value Added in Ohio: $8.9 billion

o Drilling related: $6.7 billion

o Midstream related: $1.9 billion

o Payments to Ohio labor: $6.0 billion

Associated with:

o Drilling: $4.3 billion

o Midstream development: $1.0 billion

o Public works (Roads & bridges): $490 million

o Lease bonuses & Royalty payments: $119.5 million

Page 23: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Expected Path of Development

2011 to 2014

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

23

Returns from Increased Demand in Ohio Due to Utica Shale Development

in 2012 dollars

Page 24: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

What Industries Will Be Sustained in 2014?

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

24

Total employment supported: 65,680

Associated with field development 28,100

o Support activities oil & gas operations: 10,800

o Construction oil & gas infrastructure: 18,400

o Wholesale trade: 2,200

o Transportation by truck: 1,600

Professional services 5,700

o Architecture, engineering & related: 1,500

o Environmental & other technical consulting: 1,000

o Management of companies: 700

o Legal service: 800

Page 25: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

What Industries Will Be Sustained in

2014?

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

25

Mixed services 6,300

o Real estate 2,100

o Employment services (temp staffing) 1,100

o Investment & related activities 800

Personal services 16,100

o Retail stores 5,800

o Health care 4,500

o Food service & drinking place 3,900

Page 26: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Expected Average Labor Income in 2014:

$50,225 per year

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

26

Associated with field development $59,451

o Support activities oil & gas operations $69,319

o Construction oil & gas infrastructure $48,213

o Equipment rental: $81,131

o Cement manufacturing: $77,404

Professional services $69,177

o Architecture, engineering & related $67,382

o Environmental & other technical consulting $68,263

o Management of companies $109,280

o Legal services $63,828

Page 27: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Opportunities for Ohio Industries

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

27

o Pad construction – location liners, limestone, pits, dikes, roads, etc.

o Water – for drilling and fracturing

o Mud – bentonite and barite clay

o Steel pipe (casing)

o Cement (conventional cements not acceptable)

o Sand – clean, well-sorted 20-40 mesh in particular

o Steel tanks, separators, metering equipment, production equipment, etc.

o Compressors

o Pipelines

o Treatment facilities for NGL’s, water, and impurity removal

Page 28: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Other Opportunities: Downstream

Industries

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

28

o Oil Refining

o Nitrogen Fertilizer

o Chemical and Polymer Sector

Page 29: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Selected Firms: Areal & Gorman Rupp

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

29

o Ariel Corporation (Mount Vernon), a leading

manufacturer of reciprocating (piston-driven)

compressors. Employment has grown from

500 in 2001 to 1,350 today.

o Gorman Rupp (Mansfield), which

manufacturers pumps. Recent factory

expansions have increased manufacturing

capacity by 30 to 50 percent.

Page 30: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Selected Firms: Pioneer Pipe & V&M Star

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

30

o Pioneer Pipe (Marietta), which undertakes

projects in construction, fabrication, etc. Work

for the oil and gas sector has grown from little

more than 5 percent of the firm’s total business

a couple years ago to about 20 percent today.

o V&M STAR (Youngstown), a leading

manufacturer of tubular steel products.

Currently constructing a new pipe mill, costing

$650 million.

Page 31: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Impact of the Utica Shale Development

on Ohio’s Economy

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

31

o Gross State (or Domestic) Product is expected

to increase by $4.9 billion in 2014 due to the

development of the Utica formation as an

energy resource.

o This is equal to a 1% increase in the real value

of Ohio’s Gross State Product – greater than

the average annual growth rate in Ohio for the

past 13 years (0.6%).

Page 32: Ohio shale coalition presentation 02 28_12

Questions

Economic Potential for the Utica Shale

Development in Ohio

32

o Andrew R. Thomas or

Iryna Lendel, College of

Urban Affairs, Cleveland

State University.

o Linda Woggon, Executive

Director, Ohio Shale

Coalition.

o Study Available at:

www.ohioshalecoalition.com

www.urban.csuohio.edu