Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

34
Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Transcript of Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Page 1: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Office of Highway Safety

Linden, New JerseyLinden, New Jersey

May 1, 2003

Page 2: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

N

Mercedes at final rest Ford at final rest

Water puddle

6-inch raised median curb

Page 3: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.
Page 4: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.
Page 5: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Parties to the Investigation Parties to the Investigation

• Federal Highway Administration• New Jersey Department of

Transportation• City of Linden, New Jersey, Police

Department • No public hearing, depositions, or

party submissions

Page 6: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Major Issues IdentifiedMajor Issues Identified

• Alcohol impairment• Speed enforcement• Criteria for the use of median

barriers on high-volume, high-speed roadways

Page 7: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Proposed RecommendationsProposed Recommendations

• Federal Highway Administration • American Association of State

Highway and Transportation Officials

• City of Linden, New Jersey• Reiterated safety recommendation

to State of New Jersey

Page 8: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.
Page 9: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Office of Highway Safety

Human PerformanceHuman Performance

Page 10: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

OverviewOverview

• Driver experience and health• Driver activities• Toxicology• Fatigue and alcohol

Page 11: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Experience/HealthExperience/Health

• Properly licensed• No current or pending license

suspensions• No record of recent accidents or

moving violations• Described as being in “good health”

Page 12: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Driver ActivitiesDriver Activities

• Driver had “nontraditional” schedule• Did not work the 2 days before the

accident• Active in the 12 hours prior to crash

– Stopped at a bar– Played softball– Returned to the bar– Spoke with a friend

Page 13: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

ToxicologyToxicology

• Negative for illicit drugs• Testing found alcohol

– 0.326% in blood (BAC)– 0.379% in urine– 0.210% in vitreous humor

• Levels indicate significant alcohol consumption

Page 14: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Alcohol and DrivingAlcohol and Driving

• Impairment seen at 0.02%• Driving-related behaviors impaired

at 0.08%• Higher BAC levels result in greater

impairment• Functioning at this level suggests

alcohol tolerance

Page 15: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

ToleranceTolerance

• Not immunity• Learned through practice• Problem lies in unexpected events• Driver steering response consistent

with negated tolerance

Page 16: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Operator Fatigue and AlcoholOperator Fatigue and Alcohol

• Alcohol and sleep interact• Driver’s sleep night before accident

unknown • Combined effect of alcohol

consumption and low-quality sleep impaired performance

Page 17: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.
Page 18: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Office of Highway Safety

HIGHWAY ISSUESHIGHWAY ISSUES

Page 19: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Highway Safety IssuesHighway Safety Issues

• Motorists do not comply with the 40-mph speed limit

• No median barrier at accident location

Page 20: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Speed Data for U.S. 1Speed Data for U.S. 1

• Calculated speed of Mercedes was 62 mph

• Roadway design speed of 45 mph• Posted speed limit is 40 mph• No records of a speed survey being

conducted prior to the accident

Page 21: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

NTSB Speed StudyNTSB Speed Study

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

35-39

45-49

55-59

65-69

75-79

85-89

40-mph speed limit

Number of vehicles

Rec

ord

ed s

pee

d

Page 22: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Consequences of SpeedingConsequences of Speeding

• Nationwide, speeding contributed to 30 percent of all fatal accidents reported in 2004

• Increases the severity of crash forces• Reduces the ability to steer around curves

and obstacles• Increases vehicle stopping distance• Reduces a driver’s ability to react to

dangerous situations

Page 23: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Linden P.D. Speed EnforcementLinden P.D. Speed Enforcement

• Officials were aware of problem• Police department lacked the

resources to address the problem

Page 24: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.
Page 25: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

N

Accident Location

3 southbound lanes

3 northbound lanes

6-inch-high raised median

U.S. 1 near milepost 41.4

Mercedes at final rest Ford at final rest

Page 26: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Source: Linden P.D.

Accident location

Beginning ofmedian barrier

North

Page 27: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Southbound Approach on U.S. 1

Page 28: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Northbound Approach on U.S. 1

Page 29: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Source: Microsoft

No median barrier

Page 30: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Postaccident EvaluationPostaccident Evaluation

• New Jersey DOT evaluated the accident site for a median barrier

• Determined a barrier was not needed

• Nothing to prevent another catastrophic crash

Page 31: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

AASHTO Roadside Design GuideAASHTO Roadside Design Guide

• AASHTO establishes guidance for roadway design

• Barriers should only be used if the consequence of striking the barrier are less severe than if no barrier existed

• Severity of the accident would have been reduced had a barrier been installed in place of a raised median

Page 32: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Trip points

Source: Linden Police Department

Page 33: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.

Median Barrier EvaluationMedian Barrier Evaluation

• High-speed, controlled-access roadways

• High-volume, non-controlled-access roadways

• Multilane expressways • Highways with partial control of

access• Lack of evaluative criteria

Page 34: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.