ODFW Director Recruitment Survey 11-17-14

Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife

1 / 2

Q1 The Oregon Department of Fish &

Wildlife Director must possess a number of

characteristics, experiences, and qualities

to be successful. Please rank the criteria

you feel are most important in a Director for

the Department of Fish and Wildlife. (Please

note that a designation of 1 is the highest

priority. Entries automatically re-order.)

Answered: 2,396 Skipped: 0

Have been guided with ...

Demonstrate strategic an...

Experience in communicatin...

Experience directing th...

Experience managing hum...

Ability to make progres...

Experience as a skilled...

Understand how to foster a...

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total Average Ranking

Have been guided with a strong 36.64% 13.27% 9.72% 8.68% 7.76% 7.01% 7.60% 9.31%

2,396

5.64 conservation mindset and a 878 318 233 208 186 168 182 223

commitment to using scientific basis for

resources management

Demonstrate strategic and visionary 15.57% 22.41% 14.73% 11.85% 11.10% 10.02% 7.26% 7.05%

2,396

5.25 leadership in the areas of fish and 373 537 353 284 266 240 174 169

wildlife and natural resources

management

Experience in communicating high 8.89% 14.69% 15.61% 15.15% 14.32% 12.31% 11.31% 7.72%

2,396

4.68 profile, complex and potentially 213 352 374 363 343 295 271 185

controversial subject matter in a manner

that contributes to transparency and

encourages public trust in the agency

6

5

5

5

4

4

4

4


2 / 2

Experience directing the development

of policy for fish, wildlife and/or natural

resources management

10.73%

257

12.69%

304

14.82%

355

11.60%

278

13.06%

313

13.44%

322

11.81%

283

11.85%

284

2,396

4.50

Experience managing human, financial,

budget, and information resources in a

manner which instills employee and

public trust and accomplishes the

organizations mission.

11.64%

279

10.77%

258

11.39%

273

13.61%

326

12.69%

304

13.81%

331

13.86%

332

12.23%

293

2,396

4.37

Ability to make progress in resolving 8.43% 9.81% 11.64% 14.82% 14.02% 14.86% 13.81% 12.60%

2,396

4.21 long standing and emerging problems 202 235 279 355 336 356 331 302

Experience as a skilled consensus 5.01% 9.52% 11.64% 12.60% 12.73% 13.90% 16.19% 18.41%

2,396

3.83 builder working with multiple 120 228 279 302 305 333 388 441

stakeholders, often with competing

interests.

Understand how to foster a climate in 3.09% 6.84% 10.43% 11.69% 14.32% 14.65% 18.16% 20.83%

2,396

3.52 which employees strive to meet the 74 164 250 280 343 351 435 499

highest standards of performance


1 / 66

Q2 Are there any additional characteristics,

experience, or qualities (not mentioned in

question #1) the next Department of Fish &

Wildlife Director might need in order to be

successful?

Answered: 1,363 Skipped: 1,033

# Responses

1 I think that an innovative person would suit the Director position well. We do not need an "old school, by-the-

books" type of person in leadership....it just makes the organization look clunky. This person needs to know how

to think on their feet, think outside the box, and listen to the latest science that is emerging from our top

researchers.

2 The Department greatly needs an individual that can make drastic cuts to reduce waste. I would recommend

someone with more private experience then Government.

3 Conservation and protection from corporate exploitation.

4 Would be nice to see a director with a background geared towards the main consumer, the hunters and

fishermen.

5 Understanding that ultimately the fish and wildlife resources belong to the citizens of Oregon as a whole, not

merely to the various user groups or other vocal interests and a willingness to stand up for the long term public

interest in maintaining and enhancing those resources.

6 IT IS DIFFICULT TO RANK SO MANY QUALITIES WHEN ALL ARE SO CRITICALLY IMPORTANT.ONE THAT

IS PERHAPS ASSUMED IN THE INITIAL QUESTIONS IS THE NEED TO BALANCE R4EAOURCE

CONSUMPTION AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION.

7 be tough on businesses that want you to bend the rules in their favor. It isn't going to be easy, but it has to be

done.

8 A demonstrated commitment to wildlife conservation as a top priority of management choices. A demonstrated

commitment to protecting predators. Demonstrated knowledge and policymaking that reflects successful

collaborations with other agencies and conservation organizations that protect ecosystems in order to conserve

wildlife.

9 None that come to mind.

10 "The new director should protect our public water resources by withdrawing ODF&W's application to give Oxbow

Springs in the Columbia Gorge to Nestl."

11 Yes there is: a huge dose of common sense. I cringe when I see that the ability to know and understand the

scientific domain rates mention and yet I no where do I see that the ability to use that information in the real world

as valued. How can a director begin to understand the problems/issues/needs of my world and the world of those

he/she will supervise without some real world experience and a healthy does of common sense. In most cases in

my experience directors are book smart and street stupid. I'd like to see that change.

12 I would like to see a person who isn't swayed by political pressure or money do his or her job with integrity.

That's not asking so much, is it?

13 To be fully aware of what is necessary for a healthy wilderness. Using true science, not hearsay, or biased

research.

14 They should harbor the belief that Oregon's Fish and Wildlife are a public treasure, for the good of all Oregonians,

and not something to be sold to the highest corporate bidder.

15 ability to develop and maintain successful collaborative partnerships


2 / 66

16 It is important that the director be able to also bring the non hunting and fishing community into the fold. Once

included it is important that the director help those that do and don't hunt and fish both understand the important

role of responsible consumptive and non consumptive uses of natural resources for both commerce and

recreation.

17 Leadership skills and good communication skills, verbal especially. Be a role model for employees. Be involved in

employees' activities, be more personable.

18 Experience with habitat and or nongame species issues. Our leader needs to have the foresight to bring in new

stakeholder groups in order to fulfill our mission. Focusing only on the hunter and fishers is no longer working for

us.

19 No links to commercial organizations that operate for profit to the detriment of the environment.

20 Strong presence and character suited to working in the legislative sessions.

21 Gain support from legislative policy-makers, without watering down the fish and wildlife outcomes. Recognize the

importance of and increase the engagement of the other piece of the stakeholder pie (in addition to anglers and

hunters) - the supporters of fish and wildlife (for viewing, just because, for ecosystem health, etc.). The non-

utilization group of stakeholders (some may be conservationists, others may not be) is where growth for the

agency lies. This group must be engaged and involved in planning, budgeting, and financial support of the

agency.

22 The new director should protect our public water resources by withdrawing ODF&W's application to give Oxbow

Springs in the Columbia Gorge to Nestl.

23 Honesty! ####### and those at the top often censored their biologists from speaking the truth to the public.

(smallmouth bass not an invasive? nothing wrong with the management of lamprey? Melrose de-emphasis zone

for elk= free elk for the rich landowners, less elk for everyone else)

24 It is important that the next Director makes decisions based on sound science, not to serve special-interest

groups.

25 Someone who is committed to focusing on relationships and results. Someone who understands the difference

between leading and managing, who is willing to lead (not manage) the agency. Someone who is committed to

principles (e.g. integrity, empathy).

26 Know how to listen and relate to the public. Simply saying that the public is heard and that ODFW is working for

the public does not mean it is so. It would be best if the new director is a REAL person... someone who actually

fishes and hunts and knows what the Oregon sportsmen want.

27 N/A

28 I am concerned with the introduction of hunting on wildlife refuges and the lack of announcement and short public

comment opportunity which took place in September. [disq.us/8kbt2u ] A strong commitment to conserve and

protect wildlife is crucial and to find alternatives to killing.any wildlife. Less killing, less hunting.

29 The director needs to have the ability and skills to create more opportunities for hunters in the state. As residents

we are losing opportunities and getting license rate hikes at the same time. It may be more expensive to hunt out

of state but the opportunities are greater and the experience is better. He/she needs to fix this problem.

30 must have an understanding of the coastal and river commercial fishery

31 They should not be in the pockets of lobbyist and corporate interests like Nestl, Monsanto, and large logging

operations.

32 Simplify the hunting & fishing rules. Make Hunting & Fishing a Priority NOT a fund raiser.

33 an ability and willingness to embrace the value of warm water fisheries as a valuable resource that is worthy of

budget spend and preservation. Also, the ability to recognize that nature and our native species manage

themselves better than we have or can ever do.

34 The ability to be innovative, collaborative and strategic. Strong ability to lead staff in this direction.

35 The ability to work with staff and the public to set state or regional priorities will be critical. Allocating resources to

fit with those priorities will be challenging; no one wants to see their priority go unfunded.

36 recognize local impact of ODFW actions in the agriculture sectors

3 / 66


37 The director should be a strong wilderness and natural area advocate and voice for fish and wildlife themselves,

not just human uses for these animals and resources.

38 ability to convince the hunting/fishing public that their concerns/needs are trumped by efforts to protect and

enhance biodiversity.

39 Emphasis on working with partner agencies and the ability to create new partnerships to further the ODFW

mission.

40 To remain humane and ethical when dealing with wildlife issues and not bow to political pressure from big

business interests

41 An understanding of landscape scale management. The new director cannot hope to succeed in one area, i.e.

maintaining wild salmon populations, without considering those populations as a context of the whole system,

including habitat quality and quantity, predator/prey relationships, water quality and forest health, and human

consumption. This applies to all aspects of managing fish and wildlife populations and health.

42 dedication to protecting our resources

43 Should be, or have been an active sportsman.

44 Ability to engage personally with staff members at all levels. Have a regular 'presence' with staff. Maintain an

open dialogue with staff whenever possible

45 We have had two very risk adverse directors (not counting #####) recently- ####### and ####. It is time for a

less risk adverse leader. ODFW staff moral is the lowest I've ever seen it and if we get more of the same lack

luster - bunker mentality leadership. The wheels will come completely off and no one will want to work here any

longer. 46 Luck, it seems these days...

47 Focused on habitat conservation and the ability to stay firm on the agency mission of protecting Oregon's fish,

wildlife and their habitats. The new Director needs to understand the importance of land use planning and ODFW

staff being involved in local land use actions. The Director needs to be proactive and encourage coordination

beyond just collecting data. We can have all the data in the world, but if it isn't used in policy decisions, it's

worthless.

48 Problem-solving and listening to public input on concerns and issues is vital. Previous Directors have not had this

skill and instead of hearing different perspectives, became defensive and non-engaged when issues were

broached.

49 Should be from Oregon and an active participant in hunting and/or fishing.

50 Willingness to provide support for staff when partisan entities approach the Director to denigrate staff.

Understanding of regional F&W issues and solutions.

51 Must stand on principles and not be swayed by economic dreams or short term solutions.

52 Protecting our environmental resources from large corporate greed by preserving our heritage of water, land and

native habitat for the next generation.

53 The courage and foresight to say no to special interests like Nestle who seek to use Oregon's resources for their

own gain. The complete understanding that once a resource is gone its gone for good. A big heart, mind and

conscience.

54 An open mind which can accommodate the clear understanding of rapidly shifting weather patterns of the planet

earth and a willingness to search out causes and solutions.

55 Empathy, intelligence, fairness

56 The Director should be able to step in the "shoes" of the most important assest for the agency; this the

employees. Furthermore the Director should look towards additional training for managers that are good at

science, however lack the critical skills to manage people.

57 Experience outside ODF&W, not entrenched in current culture and mindset of Department.

58 Placing the urgency of the environment and ecosystems importance and health as the first priority, above politics

and all else. Also, allowing nature to manage itself, less micro managing. Anti pollution, educating the public on

the use of pesticides, fertilizers have in nature may help prevent someone from fertilizing their lawn and then

expecting to keep finding plenty to hunt or fish.

4 / 66


59 Putting the ecological systems first (in which human and social systems rely) so that all can flourish. Starts with a

healthy, balanced, wild, & bio diverse environment!

60 The ability to stand firm in resolve and belief without wavering under pressure from bullies.

61 compassion, kindness, honesty, integrity

62 1. Incorporate indigenous knowledge,experience, and rights in all Department issues. 2. Remove privatized

interests from the public domain issues of the Department 3. Eliminate private/corporate financial issues from all

Department public domain considerations, programs and issues.

63 Boycott nestle

64 n/a

65 Be an advocate for fish, wildlife, and their habitats, rather than an advocate for fishermen and hunters. Be

compassionate toward the land and toward native species. ODF&W appears from the outside to be a network of

"Good Old Boys" which excludes many types of Oregonians. The new director should be bold, progressive, and

willing to take the department in a new direction.

66 More concern over plane fertilizers. Companies should not be putting stuff on other peoples properties.

67 Create a work environment in which employees are encouraged to work together, instead of competing with each

other.

68 Listening to mother earth. Hear her screams.

69 Uncertain

70 Moral fortitude and taking the righteous road even when it's harder to maintain.

71 The new director should have a background in wildlife biology and a love of the outdoors.

72 The mindset at Oregon Fish & Wildlife is all wrong. For example Oregon Fish & Wildlife feels that habitat

restoration is all that is necessary whereas Washington Fish & Wildlife realizes that one habitat restoration may

never be achieved, for example the invasive bullfrogs. Likewise the return of condors to the Columbia River Gorge

isn't likely with just habitat restoration. Do you really believe a condor in Arizona or southern California is just

going to fly up to Oregon? Dream on, the condors need to be reintroduced which is something Oregon Fish &

Wildlife doesn't want to do. I understand the idea behind this, we shouldn't be playing god but in this case the

condors won't probably be returning to the Columbia River Gorge in our lifetimes, if ever.

73 Ability to embrace emerging objectives and new directions in wildlife while maintaining connections to the

traditional

74 Must act first and foremost in a way that benefits the fish and the wildlife. There are plenty of people on the other

side of the issue and it's a wonder there are any animals left at this rate of depletion.

75 Customer service oriented. I believe ODFW has a terrible reputation for customer service. nine out of ten times, a

phone call to the main office results in an answering machine.

76 Experience with protecting our public water systems. The ability to work with the community members of

Cascade Locks to address unemployment with alternative proposals that offer sustainable jobs instead of

Nestle's water bottling plant proposal.

77 This person needs to see through the eyes of an outdoorsman! The people of Oregon deserve to expand the

traditions of familys going back many generations. ODFW has put to many restrictions on hunting and fishing

oportunities, Controlled hunts, catch limits, native fish restrictions (fish is a fish) uncontrolled predator populations

(what's next, do you want the Grizzly bear too?) If ODFW look at fishing and hunting like a business, you would

do more to protect your assets instead of letting it be wasted by loving it to death. People used to come from all

over to fish and hunt Oregon, I used to Deer and Elk hunt, the seasons are to mess up to be worth the effort, but

maybe that what ODFW wants? This new director needs to lead ODFW in a new direction, make us proud to fish

and hunt Oregon, so many comunities count on these resources for their familys, commercial fishing could be

great again, sport fish off the coast was a regular event for us. Invest in the right person and be great or pick the

wrong person and see the numbers of licsences keep dropping and businesses going away. Kevin M.

[email protected]

78 Interest in preserving non-game wildlife.

79 The ability to make tough choices in reducing staff and creating more efficiency.

5 / 66


80 I would just emphasize the importance of conservation, which I listed as my number one concern. The basis for

this is the simple phrase, "Once it's gone, there's no getting it back." Mother Nature is the only one who can

create the natural environment; it's a gift that needs to be treasured and cared for. Tampering with, and often

destroying, wild habitats is one of the worst actions humans can take in this world of climate change and over

development. I believe that many, many Oregonians are deeply upset and angry about the use of cruel traps,

poisons, unscientific elimination of predators, shooting of seals and owls and the kill mindset in general. It's the

approach of the ignorant bully rather than the informed caretaker. I moved here from Boston 14 years ago

because of the beauty of this state, the incredible hiking trails, the waterfalls, the wonderful wildlife that inhabit the

forests--we're so very fortunate. But there's something really creepy about knowing that the mentality overlooking

this bounty is coming from such a low-and violent-position.

81 to understand the importance of hatcheries to anglers as a "put and take" resource. So there continues to be a

good sport fishery for all.

82 Not bowing to corporate interests. Do what is best for the people, the true stakeholders of the commons.

83 Willingness to confront state land and transportation agencies regarding unsustainable practices that harm

habitat and wildlife -- I'm thinking of ODF and ODOT in particular.

84 Take care of our waters and land for the public rather than for private profits...see natural resources not as

products and crops but as amazing resources that need protection and careful usage for the good of all life now

and in the future

85 The director should be firmly committed to defending *public* resources and keeping them both protected and

under public, not private, control. The director should not have any background in the private sector, and must be

committed to resisting pressure from corporations to influence the rule-making and enforcement processes. One

example is the current controversy over the proposed water swap at Oxbow Springs that would benefit the Nestle

corporation directly. This is an unacceptable proposal, and it illustrates the kinds of pressures, both political and

economic, that the new director will need to resist.

86 This person should be a trained wildlife biologist and love outdoor recreation.

87 Should be a hunter and fisherman. Should have experience under Oregon rules and regulations.

88 Background in biology.

89 commitment to preservation of wild lands - NOT succumbing to timber interests.

90 Protection of our natural resources and wildlife should be top priority, not livestock industry interests who bully

politicians while impacting water, air, and terrestrial environments with their introduced species and antiquated

logic.

91 Willingness to include public testimony in ther decision making.

92 They MUST be committed to conservation of Oregon's natural resources, clean water, and wildlife,

REGARDLESS of pressure from companies, corporations, etc. who could compromise these for the sake of

profit. Unsustainable logging and pollution and reappropriation of public water cannot be allowed to continue,

regardless of the cost.

93 the ability to work with other organizations in lessening the effects of climate change on our environment.

Developing a more sustainable future for our children and the planet. Taking part in global efforts to solve these

issues.

94 Conservation is the absolute most important agenda item. Our wild places are what makes Oregon special.

95 The person chosen should be someone who enjoys the outdoors in some way such as fishing, hiking, sailing,

etc.

96 Yes - fully commit to enforcement of agricultural laws and industrial pollution laws relative to the recovery of

waters... make indigenous diets the standard for allowable pollution levels... which are active genocidal violence

against first nations eating indigenous fish based diets

97 serve the public interest

98 Ethics that keep them from selling our public lands to the highest bidder.

99 Keep the "commons" free from private ownership and exploitation. For example, do not sell public water to the

Nestle Corporation.

100 Someone NOT interested in building a "kingdom" like your last one. Work for the people not the power.

6 / 66


101 The Director should have previous experience with Fish and Wildlife management in multiple regions of the US

other than just the Northwest.

102 We need a conservation-minded person here to protect our beautiful state of Oregon waters and natural

resources

103 You need a commissioner from each major region that is a biologist, has a conservative outlook about the

recourses, and is an active participator in hunting and fishing so he will appreciate conserving the recourse for

further generations

104 Economic priorities can be considered but conservation must be paramount. Protection and expansion of

habitats that support diverse and important wildlife should not be anything other than a #1 priority of the new

director.

105 Remember: 1.) their purpose, 2.) the consequences of their decisions, and 3.) they have a real job to do, and it's

not political in nature. Don't give in to special interest groups. We need someone who can stand up an lead the

department, despite naysayers.

106 Have a science background and a conservation ethic Have the ability and desire to consider all constituents'

desires, including those that promote a more scientific and diverse approach to wildlife management.

107 Very important they do not sell of our water recoces for our fish hatcheries. We already struggle with declining

fish and water levels this is not a time to make it worse. Conservation is very important to those of us who live

here.

108 Greater commitment to the task at hand than to political prospects - this person should NOT be a politician (ie,

someone using this as one of many jobs on a political career ladder)

109 A passion for protecting the environment and a firm grasp of the science behind the task.

110 Have a science background and a conservation ethic Consider all constituents' desires, including those that

promote a more scientific and diverse approach to wildlife management. Consider conservation as a real goal by

including refuges from hunting Ensure native predators receive protections more in line with other species

Implement and maintain predator plans that will require nonlethal strategies as a first response Eliminate trapping

and snaring as outdated, inhumane and ecologically destructive forms of hunting Consider no hunting of wolves

when they are delisted Effect an outright ban on killing contests

111 I would prefer an Oregon native with a strong commitment to the health, integrity, and pristine nature of our

environment and scenic areas. Also someone who is able to balance the competing needs of farmers, ranchers,

food production and wildlife.

112 Understand that people are inseparable from the natural world.

113 We need a person with high ethics who puts the earth and her creatures above profit .

114 To put the needs of Oregon Fish and Wildlife about personal interest groups.

115 Use common sense

116 Experience in restoration of damaged ecosystems, streams, riparian zones, etc. Preferable to have experience in

permaculture design. Values health of microbial ecosystems at the same level as macrobiotic ecosystems, such

as soil health and structure.

117 ability to stand up to anti hunters, in court if needed and protect our big game.

118 Please choose someone who will protect and conserve wildlife. Please choose someone who values viewing wild

animals over hunting animals. As we are on the edge of the largest mass extinction in 65 million years, it is crucial

that wildlife is allowed to live.

119 Keeping our natural resources safe and intact for future generations.

120 The ability to manage our resources to improve and promote better hunting opportunities...increased herd sizes.

121 Assigning priority to expanding wilderness area protections to expand the amount of wild habitat.

122 Science background

123 Do what is right for the animals, not the public

124 Honest, highest level of integrity.

7 / 66


125 protecting wildlife and standing up to corporate businesses to protect the environment. Making sure wildlife

crimes do not go unpunished and protecting wildlife, fish and resources.

126 Facilitating accessible information for public education.

127 Have the sportsmans trust and qualities in conservation harvest numbers.

128 The ability to withstand political pressures and economical pressures from narrow interestsplacing highest priority

on the wellbeing of the earth, the water and the denizens therin. To wit: protecting water resources from

privatization, such as the Nestle efforts to control the water that must be in the stewardship of the people.

129 A love of Oregon and to make decisions based solely on what is best for the health and preservation of the

wildlife and lands of our great state.

130 Above all else, respect for Oregon's natural resources and the ability to protect it.

131 Commitment to the people and the environment of Oregon not to big business

132 Being able to take the long, long view. If we have impacted our fish and wildlife to the level they are currently,

what will their status be in another 50 or 100 years given, population growth, changes in climate and land use.

Stand up to strong perspectives that are not based on science, but on fear and myth, i.e. wolves, habitat

destruction, etc.

133 The Director of the Dept. of Fish and Wildlife must be able to put longterm public interests ahead of short term

commercial or business interests by protecting our natural resources, water, fish, and wildlife from companies

that would privately profit from harvesting our states public resources.

134 -Experience or plan for turning down potentially lucrative offers at the expense of protecting fish and wildlife. -

Ability to apply a "common sense" approach to science and data analysis meaning 1)if there is lack of scientific

research of direct cause and effect it does not necessarily indicate a lack of harm to fish and wildlife and 2)data

can be analyzed in multiple ways

135 To have clear objectives to protect our water resources. For example, to protect our water resources against

corporate interests such as Nestles wanting to mine water for financial gain that would harm the watershed.

136 A commitment to lowering our carbon footprint so as to lessen the effects of climate change.

137 Committed

138 The Director cannot successfully carry out the agency's core mission without a fundamental understanding and

unshakable conviction that when the laws of nature and of economics drive conflicting imperatives, the laws of

nature are more immutable than those of economics and must take absolute precedence. Prime example:

systematic denial by affected business interests and their political accolytes of human carbon emission as the

primary driver of global climate change because addressing that issue effectively would require the short-term

elimination of coal as an energy source and a long-term conversion to non-fossil and non-combustible (excepting

hydrogen) fuels. This is by now a well-established self-evident fact. The economic well-being of coal- and oil-

producing regions will necessarily be adversely affected by any energy policy that adapts to this natural reality.

The solution is to reorient energy and economic policy in ways that allow those regions to convert to other staple

industries (hemp production in Appalachia would be an ideal replacement for coal mining, as an example).

Likewise, locally there will be a great demand associated with climate change to access the Northwest's

abundance of clean water, and commercial interests will be at the forefront of trying to create a lucrative market in

what should be a free resource owned by all -- one that is imperative in adequate quantity and quality to sustain

fish and wildlife. Clean water and suitable habitat in general is a survival imperative and therefore a natural

RIGHT of human, animal and plant life alike, and the agency and society as a whole MUST get on board with this.

Today we need an effort comparable to the WWII war effort to conquer this threat to the survival of life as we

know it, and ODFW is in a position to be the tip of the spear. Nowhere on Earth is there a more magnificent and

habitable natural environment than in Oregon. We have much more to work with in this connection than most of

the world, and must show the rest of humanity the way forward for the sake of all.

139 Outreach skills to counterparts at all levels of government, from local to federal.

140 Must be honest, trustworthy and committed to the greater good, not the good of particular interest groups. Must

understand that the greater good is not necessarily related to money.

141 Politically independent and having the interest of all Oregonians in mind, not interests of corporations and quick

money.

8 / 66


142 I thought I was suppose to pick the most or least important in question 1. and all it did was list them in numerical

order????? Please clarify otherwise I will submit that your survey is rigged!! With regard to question #2. The

candidate would have no affiliations with businesses that would stand to benefit from said candidates position

within ODFW.

143 conflict resolution

144 have a science background and a conservation ethic

145 Interest and investment in true wildlife conservation plans that are backed by science. An ability to focus on an

ecosystem as a whole rather than trying to address problems as though species don't exist in inter-species

communities.

146 Experience working in interstate and multicultural solutions development.

147 A strong conservation ethic.

148 Strong background in field research and predator issues from an ecosystem management viewpoint

149 Ability to bridge the social gap between consumptive and non-consumptive interests in, and attitudes toward,

wildlife.

150 Honesty and Integrity

151 Must be willing to protect our land, water, wildlife resources.

152 Whomever gets the position should also be able to recognize that raising the hunting tag fees and licenses WILL

NOT make it all better and create a bigger budget. The fees have already risen to a level that more and more

people are contemplating giving up the sport due to the affordability.

153 Conservation of water and nature should be the primary goal of this job.

154 Respects the needs of wildlife over that of corporations.

155 An understanding that hatchery practices generally don't result in healthy salmon populations. An understanding

that water (i.e. as a resource) is not for corporate control but belongs to all Oregonians. Stop Nestle profiteering

at the expense of Oregon's natural resources, communities, and people.

156 Being a sportsmen themselves

157 Conservation-minded to ensure that tourists and future generations enjoy Oregon's outdoors.

158 Question 1 did not work!!!!!

159 Wildlife management based on fact not miguided environmentalists

160 I think the previous answers cover it.

161 Understanding the critical need to conserve the lives of living beings, and their habitat above all else.

162 nope.

163 A sense of humor & nerves of steel. An excellent listener & communicator.

164 public support for conservation policies

165 To protect the lives of wildlife. Hopefully will be against hunting.

166 The new director should be a strong environmentalist with a proven record of protecting wildlife andhabitat based

on real science.

167 Someone who works well with others and doesn't seek consensus but builds consensus. Someone who has a

love and understanding of the outdoors but doesn't sacrifice larger community interests for natural interests when

they are lesser.

168 Protect our resources from the profit oriented exploitation by Corporate groups in other states and countries.

169 strongly motivated to protect the water of Bull Run and the Pacific northwest from corporate interest

170 willingness to go out on a limb to PROTECT our wilderness and wildlife areas for future generations. Does not

cave in to petty corporate politics that benefit the few at the expense of the many. Has personal integrity!

171 Long term vision

9 / 66


172 I would prefer someone who is not beholden to the idea that government needs to manage itself like a business

and puts long-term resource health ahead of short-term fiscal targets. Someone who recognizes the vital

importance of water to our long-term occupation of this ecosphere and protects that in the face of economic and

political pressure.

173 Should have strong science background and an obvious dedication to water protection for the people of Oregon

to preserve our water rights. You can live without oil but one cannot live without water.

174 patience

175 Willingness to stand up to large corporations and the fallacy that jobs should dictate over the environment.

176 They cannot have close ties to industry or hold a pro-business agenda.

177 The next director should make a priority out of protecting our natural resources from private developers and those

who are seeking to make a profit of of public lands.

178 The qualities listed in the survey seemed to me to be almost all equally important and I don't feel like the survey

accurately reflects my beliefs.

179 A focus on preserving our resources is the top priority.

180 - have a science background and a conservation ethic - consider all constituents' desires, including those that

promote a more scientific and diverse approach to wildlife management. - consider conservation as a real goal by

including refuges from hunting - ensure native predators receive protections more in line with other species -

implement and maintain predator plans that will require nonlethal strategies as a first response - eliminate trapping

and snaring as outdated, inhumane and ecologically destructive forms of hunting - consider no hunting

of wolves when they are delisted - effect an outright ban on killing contests

181 Commitment to long term preservation of resources for the public rather than short term gain for private profit.

182 Understanding of how public goods benefit the public and how privatization harms the public. Understanding of

the theories by Nobel laureate Elinor Ostrom of how to manage shared resources without privatizing them. A

good foundation in the theory of economics and a pro-social attitude that prevents them from allowing

corporations to privatize and profit from water and other natural resources that belong to all of us.

183 Must be a hunter/fisherman

184 Preferably be an outdoor person who hunts and fishes as they will see short comings in policy.

185 Belief in the fact that public lands belong to everyone, not to any particular county, corporation or other special

interest group.

186 biology and climate change and how it effects animals and their environment

187 background in wildlife biology, an appreciation for outdoor recreation, and an deep respect for the stewardship

responsibilities the director would hold for future generations

188 I think dedication to conserving our limited natural resources and protecting them for Oregonians is the top

priority.

189 The next director needs to realize his/her responsibility is to manage fish and wildlife for the benefit of the

species, the planet, and all the people of Oregon -- not just hunters and anglers.

190 Ability to deeply listen to and understand opposing points of view, to engage with ideas that may be unusual or

untested. And also, respect for all participants involved. We have to address the needs behind our policies

effectively, or we'll continue to fight with each other about appropriate use of natural resources, wasting energy,

time, and goodwill.

191 The new director should have a strong commitment to conservation of wildlife. A vast majority of Oregonians

favor conservation of wildlife, and are unaware that ODFW's funding is reliant on hunting and fishing. Getting a

permanent funding source that is divorced from hunting and fishing should be the top priority for the new director.

I believe Oregonians do not know that ODFW is chronically underfunded and would be very sorry to hear it. So

the first step is to communicate to Oregonians the ways in which fish, wildlife and birds are harmed because

ODFW does not get enough money from the legislature to properly implement for example the Conservation

Strategy. The great news is that Oregonians love wildlife, so the money will be found, the challenge is how to

communicate to the public how important it is to transform ODFW into a conservation organization as people

already think it is. Having Nestle give up and go away in Oregon especially Columbia Gorge would be an effective

strategy to engage the public. No more business as usual, but daring to do the right and legal thing by

protecting fish and wildlife and denying Nestle.

10 / 66


192 Honesty and integrity.

193 No... the characteristics listed in question 1 do a good job of covering all relevant qualifications for this position.

194 The courage and integrity necessary to take the best actions for wildlife even when they are not popular with tbe

general public.

195 Translating information for broad general public understanding

196 A commitment to protecting and preserving the natural ecosystems in as much balance as possible ahead of

human over-use. The person is charged with the keeping of public land balanced with human activity.

197 Ability to share those very important values for fish and wildlife with other states and government agencies and

hold your ground for what is right when big time lobbyists try to buy the opposite values.

198 I would like to see this agency first and foremost support the wildlife and wilderness areas with the highest

degree of respect and understanding of ecological systems - not of man and how we make money and how we

'manage' these resources for human gain other than the undeniable benefit of staying out of nature's business. I

would like to see Oregon's wilderness areas be just that and know that administration and staff support this.

199 The previous questions are irrelevant to me, so please ignore my answers but do take note of what I consider to

be important: IS THE DIRECTOR CONSERVATION-MINDED IE. DOES HE - OR SHE - HAVE THE BEST

INTERESTS OF WILDLIFE AT HEART? DOES HE HAVE EMPATHY? IE. WILL THIS PERSON RESTRICT THE

TORTURE AND KILLING OF ANIMALS BY THE CONSUMPTIVE MINORITY USING POISON, TRAPS,

DROWNING ETC.? DOES THE DIRECTOR PRIORITIZE PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT FOR THE

ENVIRONMENT'S SAKE (INCLUDING WILDLIFE) AND NOT ONLY FOR THE PERCEIVED BENEFIT OF

PEOPLE?

200 That the individual be well-read with current literature and news pertaining to the protection of public resources,

not only in the region, but in other parts of the country and world.

201 Care passionately about the environment

202 Ability to question why water bottle companies can't purchase their own springs rather than poach public

resources.

203 Understand the history of Oregon and be sensitive to Oregonian's long-standing values and perspectives. The

state's resources are precious and need to be managed for the long-term benefit of all Oregonians.

204 Ability to resist political pressure and stick to the science.

205 A clear understanding of and appreciation for the state's unique natural resources and a willingness to put

preservation and expansion of our natural ecosystems as a primary priority.

206 The reality of Global warming should be factored into every decision made about Oregon's wildlife.

207 Commitment t to keep public lands public. Protect the carbon balance of our great forests. Keep all commercial

enterprise ecologically sound locally employed and habitat oriented. Commitment to stewardship rather than

"harvest any old growth or second groth areas. Commitment to ban clear cut s entirely.

208 Perhaps focusing on the watershed health issues so healthy sustaining runs of native species may be self-

propagating. Hatchery dollars put toward steelhead returns have been producing diminishing returns for the

amount of dollars invested. This means a clear mission is defined between anadromous fish run natural

reproduction rates and watershed health. This issue crosses many jurisdictions and should be a large focus,

especially in light of how many additional sportsman dollars are spent pursuing these species. There are few

natural resources in the state of Oregon where the economy is more stimulated than where plentiful of

harvestable fish are present.

209 Not really. All of those skills are important.

210 A commitment to a long term (7 generation) stewardship of our resources for the benefit of ALL the people.

Public rights over corporate rights.

211 To specifically focus on the fact that as director, he or she is entrusted with a finite resource that belongs to the

public.

212 Should have long term view and protect public resources vs. selling them to out of state interests or exploiting

them for short term gain. E.g. NO Nestle water giveaway. Water is the next oil. Currently it belongs to the people

of Oregon. Giving it for pennies on the dollar to a foreign company in exchange for a few relatively short term

jobs is inexcusable waste.

11 / 66



Springs in the Columbia Gorge to Nestl.

214 Commitment and experience in eliminating sexism and raciswm within the organization. Show examples of when

she or he has done this in past jobs

215 Income sources are always important for any agency - but it should not be the driving force of policy. ALL

Oregonians need to have a say in natures preservation. A director who understands that and does not focus on

one or two sport oriented groups is needed.

216 Strong commitment to preserving our natural resources for the PUBLIC good, not for private corporations.

217 Someone who loves fish, wildlife, water and humans!

218 The options listed are sufficient

219 * To have a science background and a conservation ethic * To understand that the public viewpoint is shifting to

see fish and wildlife as parts of a functioning and necessary ecosystem, not just as targets for sportsmen, and

therefore to support that reality rather than drag against it

220 An understanding of the history of use and enjoyment and competing interests in managing and preserving

Oregon lands and waters.

221 No, I think that's a pretty good list.

222 Quick study.

223 He or she should understand that the exploitation of natural resources for private gain is often at variance with

conservation, and that conservation is our highest value here in Oregon.

224 Able to see the big picture and communicate that vision to employees and the public

225 High level of integrity

226 Must stand in strong opposition to man made pollution and wilderness corruption

227 needs to prioritize the future of Oregon wildlife over compromise with business interests.

228 Ability to withstand corporate financial and political pressure for corporate gain, when making decisions for

Oregon fish and wildlife and their futures.

229 The challenge in such a position is the combination of the public policy face of it, business interests, and the

detailed nature of conservation policy. Conservation -- if well done -- is our ace card for Oregon's future. Don't

repeat mistakes such as logging a large part of Bull Run for short term profit. We need a visionary able to carry

the message to the public and articulate enough to be able to stand up to the inevitable (false) 'jobs vs.

environment" game.

230 None.

231 I really believe what I listed as #1 and #2 are truly the most important qualities. We need someone whose focus is

to protect our precious natural resources (isn't that why most of us live in Oregon, because of the beauty and

livability of this state) and someone who can work with people at cross interests because of some of the

contentious issues we face today.

232 Refrain from establishing policy based on the wants and influences of private, for-profit corporations. The resolve

to re-write polices that do just that, despite powerful monied influences applying pressure. Consistently reaching

out to the public for input and then actually listening to it.

233 Thoroughly understand and appreciate climate change and what it will likely affect in Oregon's environment.

234 Quick and transparent decision-making where possible.

235 Ability to choose and secure the best options for Oregon's fish and wildlife habitats regardless of competing

pressure (financial or otherwise) from political or commercial interests


Springs in the Columbia Gorge to Nestl. Thank you.

237 Skills and experience in public participation, and the ability to facilitate effective two way communication with

stakeholders and the public.

238 should be an inspiring person. Someone who is admirable and charismatic.

12 / 66


239 Conservation before profit, always. To make Oregon a world leader in conservation and precious resource

preservation. Duty now for the future!

240 Respect for preserving our diminishing wild areas!

241 The next director should have a strong background in science and be able to consider the needs of all Oregon

residents, including non-consumptive users of wildlife. The director should also have a strong conservation ethic.

242 Would love to see someone in this position who is not necessarily a hunter or angler. Definitely these activities

should not be prerequisites for this role.

243 Well it would be nice to have an individual with a sportsman's background to there is continued context and

appreciation of the the Agency's historic mission. And someone for whom political correctness, especially in

regard to predator control is something to acknowledge but not necessarily be governed by.... Oh and I voted to

ban dogs-bait for bear cougar. However, I also realize now that my vote was a mistake. Never used to carry a

firearm bowhunting. After a cougar came out of nearby tree - on the Eastern side of the Coast Range I now feel

compelled too. Sorry for the rant, its just that the agency needs to recognize mistakes and correct them for

conservation and not political purposes.

244 Common sense would be very helpful..which we as the public haven't seen in the prior management. .

245 The individual should not have conflicting ties to commercial fisheries. For example should not own or operate a

commercial fishing boat or commercial fishing supply store, or be related to commercial fisheries interests.

246 get the cougar population understood that's is growing and not allow the wolves here

247 The ability to equally balance preserving wildlife and habitats for sportsmen/women and other outdoor

enthusiasts.

248 To listen to the public.....all sides of the public, not just the sportsman's side.

249 Respect for predators and wilderness /Endangered species Understanding of Old Growth dependant - / forestry

issues Water quality/quantity / erosion, sediment /understanding pollution>pesticides < Wild Fish ! Problem

animal mediation- bears.cougar.wolf...hunters groups? Disease like foot rot-elk and hair loss S.- deer Love

Nature!







251 Put wildlife first realising that there is a greater concern to humans than how much money can be made.

252 Understanding that the Department of Fish and Wildlife is responsible first to the wildlife it aims to protect and

their habitat. Understanding that stakeholders are not only hunters and ranchers but wildlife advocates, wildlife

rehabilitators and 'environmentalists' as well and no stakeholder group should be listened to more or less than the

others.

253 They should be committed to conservation for the sake of the animals and the balance of wildlife - not for the

convenience of killers

254 In the matter of keystone predators, ie: wolves, cougars, etc, do not allow favor to be given to the hunting and

ranching factions who seem to be major influencing factors in wildlife management. I am very much against the

favoritism shown to the ranching and hunting community.

255 A strong sense of the importance of all species and their value to our environment. An ability to be strong when

facing ignorance and greed.

256 Although it is a difficult task, the person should balance all interests without a bias for or against any one group of

people; sportsman, scientists, government agencies, companies, ect. Everyone has their own agendas, but the

person should be able to focus on the mission of ODFW.

257 Ability to work effectively with politicians

258 Have university education in ecology and conservation and understand ecosystems, not just forestry and

"resource management." Consider ALL constituent's opinions, including those promoting a more scientific and

ecological approach to wildlife management.

13 / 66


259 FWS Director should always identify nonlethal means to resolve conflicts between ranchers,farmers and wildlife.

Should investigate humans who complain of wildlife because many are animal haters. Should end welfare

ranching on public lands. Should end aerial shooting of wildlife as population control and instead use birth control.

260 Would like to see leadership from ODFW that is not beholden to hunting, trapping, fishing interests. ODFW works

for the entire state, not just the small minority of those who wish to crudely extract wildlife for their own use.

Oregon wildlife is something to behold and enjoy wild in state and federal lands. The new director of Oregon Fish

& Wildlife should: - have a science background and a conservation ethic - consider conservation as a real goal by





261 Teddy Roosevelt like. Conservationist who looks toward future populations and sets aside refuges.

262 Preference show for a candidate OUTSIDE of the ranching and hunting industries. Wildlife biologist.

263 Respect and preserve wildlife over the needs of humans.

264 The Director must use sound science to base decisions on, be honest, and use an ecosystem approach to

wildlife management rather than predator control. Hunting licenses must not be issued to balance the books.

More funds for the department can be got through poacher patrols near rural residential areas with steep

fines.Thedirector

265 Not owned by any one special interest group: do not hire a former timber executive or gun rights nut.

266 How will they handle conflicts between livestock interests, hunters, and non-game animal proponents.

267 Compassion for wildlife and acknowledging that animals are sentient beings who feel fear, stress and pain as we

do.

268 I think the person should not have a family who involved in livestock farming. We need to choose someone who

has no bias towards apex predators or livestock ranching. Maybe, a non hunter should be considered for the

position.

269 An understanding of and vision for conservation of wild populations based on emerging science.

270 Understanding that wildlife and human interests are not mutually exclusive and that human priorities don't always

come first.

271 Not cower to Legislator's threats or unreasonable demands. On tarry to sound science. Need to back up ODFW

staff when attacked by political interests in my opinion Director' s office has lacked courage up stand up to legal

store and were willing to sell out staff, sound science, and sportspersons to get budget passes. You don't need

100% yes votes to pass a budget!

272 They should be a crossbow hunter, and have a Master in Business Administration and a minimum of 10 years of

experience.

273 Advocate of agency mission and personnel to public, other interest groups and politicians. Charismatic leader.

Ability to see and implement pathways to solutions. Recognized scientific expert/leader.

274 I believe the wild spaces are sources in their own right. What I mean by that, is contrasted to being re-sources.

You see, many people take advantage of those wild spaces and many people draw some type of inspiration or

reinvigoration from enjoying them. In that regard, the management of those spaces and resources should

encourage preservation of them as SOURCE of encouragement and power for generations to come.

275 From the perspective of the vast majority of Oregonians who support the conservation rather than the hunting of

Oregon's wildlife, I believe the new director should have a desire to shift emphasis from consumptive to non-

consumptive priorities within the ODFW. This would be in line with national and state trends of the last several

decades. This does not mean that the ODFW would no longer support hunting/fishing, but that the balance of its

efforts and expenditures would be strongly tilted toward species conservation, habitat protection and expansion

and less toward the traditional emphasis on maintaining, for example, over-abundant ungulate populations.

276 Lots of experience conserving and protecting non-game wildlife.

277 Make decisions that benefit all people, not just anglers, hunters, and ranchers. Promote and protect public land

for public use, not private use (like ranchers grazing their livestock on public land).

14 / 66


278 Knowledge in the fact that wild steelhead need to be protected. Develop a plan for NO KILL for wild steelhead in

the entire state of Oregon. Protect natural steelhead spanning by not introducing "hatch fish" in the North

Umpqua River System.

279 Someone that will not raise the license fees, come on $340+millions budget? Why so much, majority of the

ODFW are poacher anyway.

280 The ability to stand up to and not be risk adverse to inaccurate public and media perceptions and misinformation.

Ensure that key Policy HQ staff are making sound and fair decisions that are supported by the OARs and biology.

Ensure a firm hand in ensuring Division(s) fiscal responsibilty and maximization of outside funding sources (e.g.

Do no cut Agency funding that attracts Federal contributions).

281 Being completely honest and unbiased towards conservation efforts. Ability to manage wildlife using methods

that do not inflict pain and suffering or play games with overpopulated animals. Ability to use the brain and not a

quick fix when it comes to manage wildlife. Be professional not cruel and sloppy.

282 An open mind. Director must be able to think about the whole picture, not just the interests of one group of

people. Also relates to animal populations.

283 He/she should be a hunter/fisherman/outdoorsman. Who truly understands the issues and is willing to address

the problems we are facing.

284 An understanding that the purpose of this office is not to handhold the concerns of a favored few, but to safeguard

the lives of present and future denizens occupying our wildlands for all to experience.

285 Demonstrate the ability to work along side multiple interest groups with one common goal. That is to teach live in

harmony with fish and wildlife and their ecosystems, not against fish and wildlife; to conserve and protect natural

resources. Hands on and visibility is necessary to build emplyee leadership, as well as public trust. Work witth

state, regional and national efforts, including E.S.A. monitoring and changes, including listing and delisting

species as related to hunting (example, pending regulations which might delist the Wolf); allow the species to

properly establish iin OR before opening hunting. Regarding hunting, do not allow any type of trapping, baiting,

hounding, poisoning, etc., especially that which could inflict unusual suffering, or affect multiple species, i.e.,

poisoning.

286 Fish management shouldn't be the main priority, realize hunters and hunting organizations have alot to offer

287 The next director should: - consider conservation as a real goal by including refuges from hunting - ensure native

predators receive protections more in line with other species - implement and maintain predator plans that will

require nonlethal strategies as a first response - eliminate trapping and snaring as outdated, inhumane and

ecologically destructive forms of hunting - consider no hunting of wolves when they are delisted - effect an

outright ban on killing contests

288 Since we are discussing the person overseeing Oregon's finite resources which, if mismanaged could leave

Oregon like so many regions which have removed wildlife habitat after depleting natural resources that belong

not just to Oregonians but to those who cannot defend them, we should be looking for someone who is

passionate about conservation.

289 Familiar with Oregon-specific wildlife and fish issues.

290 Basic understanding of the history of fish and wildlife management in Oregon, the recent changes (ie particularly

fish/wildlife population declines) that have occurred resulting in declines in hunting and fishing opportunities, and

the culture of the employees that work at ODFW.

291 1) Fully understand and appreciate that the Department manages all native wildlife and fish and just not game

species. 2) Has the vision and commitment to seek diverse sources of funding to manage the above 3)

Understands the need to develop programs and funding streams related to non-consumptive fish and wildlife

users

15 / 66


292 Yes, the Director should possess a degree in wildlife biology and environmental science and have a love for the

natural world. He/she should be someone who truly enjoys outdoor recreation and feels that preservation of

wildlife and our natural resources are paramount to any well-funded special interest groups, such as ranchers

and farmers. Above all else, the Director should protect the Oregon Public Trust Doctrine and be the voice and

protector of wildlife and the natural resources for future generations. The Director should be mindful of climate

change before making any decisions regarding hunting, logging, hazing, fishing, or elimination of any particular

species. The Oregon Fish and Wildlife Department should take seriously it's job of being the protector of wildlife

and our natural resources and the Director should possess the educational requirements and experience

necessary to use scientific research before making decisions to kill any animal. The public values our public

lands and resources, including our beautiful wildlife, and the Director of Oregon Fish and Wildlife should be the

leader in innovative methods to conserve resources, not destroy. He/she should be out "in the field" as much as

possible.

293 The ability to make decisions on a rational basis and resist undue influence from corporate or commercial

interests

294 The Director needs to have superior communication skills in order to move staff in a singular direction while

communicating effectively with multiple stakeholders.

295 Stop catering to hunters and estBlish no hunting areas for conservTion and wildlife watching.

296 I'd like to see someone interested in partnering with other state and federal agencies and working toward solving

problems to the mutual benefit of everyone.

297 Conflict resolution experience in order to bring the rural-urban differences in priorities to a productive

conversation that doesn't gloss over deep seeded disputes.

298 1) A recognition that non-game fish and wildlife are more abundant than and probably more important to

ecosystem function than game fish and wildlife. 2) The Director should be an individual who is logical and

reasonable. 3) The Director should be devoid of any "us vs the rest of the world" mentality. 4) The Director should

walk the walk not just talk the talk of collaboration and partnerships for the betterment of fish and wildlife.

299 Someone with a background in wildlife biology and a love of outdoor recreation.

300 Stop killing wildlife!! Wild animals have less and less habitat to survive and just live their daily lives. Please work

towards preserving the amazing species of all types including predators such as wolves and coyotes. We must

protect the entire ecosystem in order for all of us to survive.

301 The ability to think "outside the box" when considering wildlife management strategies, especially those pertaining

to predators.

302 Start listening to majority of hunters and fishers in stead of elite minority!

303 As the ultimate interface between science/conservation and politics, the director needs to be skilled in both

arenas. He needs to be able to project 'cool' under fire. He needs to be able to speak effectively in both

interpersonal and public forums. He needs to be persuasive, while at the same time not offending those who may

disagree. And, he needs to be able to bring the department along with him even when dealing with political forces

that many employees disagree with.

304 Yes he should consider an outright ban on killing contests.

305 A person with children and/or a genuine investment in the long-term health of the environment.

306 In my dealings with ODFW, it's very much an Old Boy's network, focused on hunting and fishing, to the detriment

of nongame species. A woman in this position, who is both a hunter / fisher, and a biologist, would be perfect.







308 The individual should have a science background and support passive use of resources, rather than supporting

the active destruction of resources. Consider conservation the primary goal of the department. Eliminate trapping

and snaring, as these are inhumane, outdated, torturous forms of hunting. Ensure that native predators receive

protections in line with other animals.

16 / 66


309 We need someone who can stand up for conserving, protecting and rehabilitating the environment. This has to be

a priority over recreational purposes. Our native species of fish need to be protected and that may mean removing

dams and getting rid of hatchery fish. Unpopular, but necessary. Science backs this up.

310 Love of the outdoors!

311 A true love of nature without bias against any particular species. An true understanding of the essential balance

between predators and prey animals, and especially "apex" predators. A true hatred for the wanton slaughter of

wolves, bears, cougars, coyotes, or any other animal.

312 Field experience

313 Emphasis on sustaining or increasing water and land wildlife even at the expense of commercial and sport

interests. Making sure that Oregon's wildlife is available to future generations to enjoy.

314 This person must have broad perspective in representing wildlife issues for ALL state residents, not just hunters

and anglers. Watchable wildlife should be placed high on the agenda.

315 Honesty, Courage to fight the prevailing politics base on public perception not common sense supported by real

science.

316 Someone who appreciates the delicate nature of our unique environment. Someone who will not let short term

financial gains drive descisions.

317 Collaborative

318 The Director should acknowledge that on all proposed issues and policies, he/she will ask the following question:

Based on the best science, does this action or policy protect and enhance the conservation and protection of

Oregon's fish & wildlife and the habitat they require. If the answer is to this question is NO, then the proposed

action or policy must not go forward.

319 ability to inspire confidence in the employees and stakeholders dedication to non-game wildlife conservation

320 Some scientific training or preparation for dealing with current climatological trends. Good social media skills or

the ability to hire people with those.

321 Lower the cost of tags and application fees this is dicouraging hunters to purchase tags which in turn lowers the

money coming in then the the department raises the fee's, many hunters cant afford the cost of a tag anymore my

children love to hunt and I want to have them be encouraged rather than discouraged just because of money.

322 We need to realize that, like it or not, we have put ourselves into a position that requires us to be stewards of the

environment. We are in a rebuilding, or repairing, time of natural resources. And so, special interest groups

should not be allowed to just stop that process with a legal action without being required to assist in achieving it's

solution. Furthermore, we need more oversight. These efforts need better protection from start to finish, not just

Oregon boundaries.

323 Willing to focus on "Protecting" wildlife, even at the cost of domestic animals or economic impacts. Too many

animals are killed in the name of "wildlife management". Some agency has to have protection as its main focus.

324 Should be someone with a scientific background not focused on special interest big industry.

325 Someone with a frame of reference to the natural world that can see the difference between true restoration of

problems caused by logging and other disturbances and the collaborative lies being fostered as restoration in the

watershed councils and stewardship groups destroying what is left of our biosphere. Someone who is not driven

by economics and will not shill for the timber industry.

326 The Director of FWS should actually care about the well being of wildlife and do everything to protect it. The

overwhelming amount of scientific data available must be a top priority in making decisions. Furthermore, the

view of the majority of the citizens of the United States should be at the forefront of any and all decisions

regarding wildlife, nature and conservation measures. Wildlife belongs to all citizens and should not be viewed

only from a limited, one state perspective.

327 I believe they should have a kind and generous spirit toward the welfare of the animals involved. Their protection

should be high on the list of priorities.

328 Help to ensure that forest lands are available to hunt in.

17 / 66


329 Common sense and an ability to look beyond the BS that now seems to be pervading wildlife management. Ability

to stand firm on sound policy in light of continuing pressures from strident environmental groups like Defenders of

Wildlife, WildEarth Guardians and Predator Defense. An ability to represent the entire state, not just the uber-

liberal I-5 Corridor, and an understanding of the risks faced by the farming and ranching communities in the other

2/3 of the state.

330 Integrity and accountability, and requiring that of all his/her employees.

331 A TRUE lover of nature and animals (making thoses things his/her top priority - not hunters & trappers)

332 To be independent of ANY OTHER organizations, not to have conflicting interests, ie. NOT to be a rancher or a

member of a ranching family!

333 No hunter!! Someone who set the animals first!!!

334 Best-science conservation: Kill the hatcheries. Prioritize non-game fish/wildlife. Stop hunting seasons for top

carnivores.

335 Background in wildlife biology, a focus on preservation and restoration of biosystems, a love of the outdoors and

expanding opportunities for generations to come to have access to wild places.

336 Must not put ODFW on a pedestal - need to work with many other agencies, institutions, etc.

337 The COURAGE to make decisions based on actual science in order to benefit ALL species instead of just game

species. The COURAGE to make good decisions based on what is best for the wildlife, as opposed what is best

for consumptive users. And the COURAGE to stand by these decisions, even if they anger some special interests

groups. Finally the ETHICS to do what is right and not being swayed by the need to be liked, or by what

would be easiest or in their own best interests.

338 Some familiarity with the particular issues in Oregon, and differing priorities that will be encountered.

339 Love of outdoor recreation

340 I just want to reiterate that someone with a background and focus in wildlife and fisheries biology as well as a love

of and appreciation for outdoor recreation is a critical skillset that a Director should possess.

341 Knowledge of what will decimate fish populations and dedication to prevention. Bird and fish are vulnerable to the

chemical and physical changes made by humans. Outdoor sports and our survival as a species may depend on

our understanding of this. I grew up in Oregon. The outdoors is why people come here. It is why we stay. Thank

you for your time Elyse Thompson

342 To not be personally compromised with conflict of interest but dedicated to the specie or wildlife projects success

of the highest good of the wildlife's continued survival.

343 Develop a better understanding of how to run a fiscally sound business/agency by appealing to rate payer(license

holders),

344 Better management of endangered species habitat.

345 Not a puppet for the Forestry industry.

346 I'd love to see the person of interest be especially gifted in communication skills to be able to talk with ranchers

and the public to save our wildlife. To solve problems with the wolves and other predatory animals. Keeping in

mind our native species as the primary species needing protection. Being mindful that our wildlife are part of the

whole of the earth and how important ecology and habitat is to wildlife and there -by being important to us. Our

own survival depends on a healthy ecosystem. Being capable of turning away from big interests groups that are

only driven my money and self interest. Keeping in mind always the health of bees and our flora and fauna. Be

willing and able to use alternative options in place of pesticides, herbicides and insecticides. Being especially

concerned in Non GMO products to our land, air and water. In other words, someone that is aware of the

important issues concerning the universal health of all. And capable of making independent decisions in favor of

our overall best. Id like to know that this person is interested in species extinction and which life forms are

especially vulnerable.

347 The ability to stand up to political pressure when making wildlife management decisions.

348 Outside the Box thinking is critical. Times are changing and the public at large is no longer approving of hunting

or predator killing contests. It's essential the new dir

349 I believe that the new director should have a back ground of ACTUAL experience in wildlife harvest. I believe that

this will best serve the mission of the ODFW, and ensure the future use and enjoyment of our future generations.

18 / 66


350 Loves animals and nature and the natural order of wild life, especially those that were here before us and driven

to or near extinction. A person that shows respect for his position and can not be "bought" or persuaded .

351 Must be for wildlife and wild places. Must be compassionate, empathize and humane. Must have a love of

animals and nature. Must be willing to stand up for wildlife and wildlife habitats. Must support the endanger Spies

Act. Must be strong enough to stand up for what is right and just and not compromise his values.

352 Having a sense of fairness when dealing with all groups that want their interests protected and using science to

guide these decisions. ie. not caving into special interest groups i.e. hunters, ranchers needs that only represent

6% of the population.

353 Look at the effect clear cut logging has had on fish and wildlife in the state of Oregon. Look at the big picture of

how our environment affects ther health and welfare of fish and wildlife here.

354 Make changes to how this agency is funded. If not general funding then then a special tax (call it what you want)

that provides money for the agency from all residents.

355 Having worked for ODF&W for many years - NOT FROM OUTSIDE!!!

356 Be objective and fair in protecting our wildlife and resources. Not to be ruled by money, but by your heart.

357 Need to know that habitat protection is the most important issue.

358 Risk taking for addressing the big, complex challenges Oregon is facing.

359 Thick skin.

360 The director needs to absolutely put wildlife and wild land protection first and not allow the hunting, trapping and

cattle lobby to put pressure on the DFW. Killing wildlife has to be seen as an unacceptable option. This director

needs to be bold and forward thinking enough to acknowledge the damage that animal farming is doing to the

planet and ecosystem.

361 a willingness to encourage input from private Oregon citizens.

362 I hope she or he is able to prioritize the health of the ecosystem over all things. Hunting, fishing and outdoor

recreation require a vibrant environment. Ensuring habitat for rare and endangered species and honoring the

essential role of predators are key.

363 The most important to me would be someone who understands Permaculture Design. This is a science based,

whole-systems approach to the complete web of life and the interactions and relationships therein. It is derived

form the words Permanent and Culture and seeks to work with nature, to partner with nature as opposed to

fighting it. Why not put Mother Nature's power on your side instead of fighting against something you can never

hope to defeat? Watershed management, soils management, fire management erosion control and harnessing

the natural inputs of sun light, precipitation, wind, and organic matter deposition are all woven together in a

holistic system rather than treated as separate or competing elements. Nature and the universe are structured

like a web, just as our brains' neural net, mycelial webs or the internet are. They must be an integrated system to

function correctly.

364 A true commitment to the fish and wildlife, a desire to protect them and their habitats.

365 CONSERVATION! I am very concerned that the new Director promotes CONSERVATION and Maintaining the

SAFETY of ENDANGERED ANIMALS! The director should NOT bend to extremist hunting/nra/angler interests.

The director should also follow SCIENCE based research on how to best PROTECT the Environment AND

Wildlife in it!!!

366 The Director needs to be more conservation minded in the regards to wildlife, wilderness, and public lands. The

Director is acting steward if these that belong to us all. And not give into any hunting or livestock special interests

at the sake of wildlife and land

367 Someone who represents the constituents that fund ODFW. Simply put, someone who has the best interest of

hunters at heart

368 someone who is visionary in understanding that today's decisions affect generations to come, for both human

and the environment

369 Respect for and honoring employees AND families.

370 Someone who is actually a true wildlife biologist with a masters or PhD degree and has worked out in the field

with integrity.

19 / 66


371 All those questions are very good and a number could easily be #1. I feel that whoever gets this job has to be

prepared to be very transparent (unlike Wisconsin where they are dodging the question of why they allowed so

many wolves to be killed in 2 zones. I personally was hung up on when I asked if they had taken an extra 100

wolves would something have been done.) So this person must be prepared to be very transparent and not hang

up on citizens who have a logical question.

372 The next Director needs to understand the sciences of biology and ecology. Specifically that our natural

environment needs both predators and prey to be in balance.

373 The ability to take a stand against the development or destruction of natural resources/habitat for corporate

purposes & protect our wildlands for hundreds of future generations

374 Determination to enforce law concerning ALL violations, equally prosecuting individuals and organizations no

matter how politically powerful. The conservation of Oregon wild resources is the goal, and citizens of all states

should value ODFW management.

375 Be open to a new approach to wild life management that is not so dependent on game species, but takes a

holistic approach that will bring in the interests of a broader group of stakeholders representing the recreation

community.

376 SAVE & PROTECT ALL ANIMALS & ENVIRONMENTS. CURTAIL LOGGING. STOP POLLUTION.

377 The ability to listen to all sides of an issue. The ability to be non-biased. Dedication to protect our natural

resources and to stand up to those that merely want to exploit them for human entertainment.

378 Knowledge of the science of fisheries, and the importance of wild stock not farmed fish. Emphasis on the

importance of Salmon restoration, dam removal, fish ladder if dams are employed, and stopping dumping of

waste in rivers and the Ocean.

379 Should be someone who is active in hunting and fishing.

380 The Director should represent the interests of sport, recreational, and commercial enterprises. That being said,

allowing for large scale commercial fishing operations in the upper river is an issue that needs to be addressed

with greater intensity. Commercial fishers can still harvest in the ocean. Imposing unreasonable bag limits that

allow for high fish mortality while allowing commercial fishers to keep any fish swimming up the river via gill net

harvest is a double standard that needs to end.

381 Since the population of Oregon is approx 3.93 million ( 2013 census) & there are ONLY 259,000 registered

hunters, I would like to see a person who represents the PEOPLE of Oregon, NOT juts the few ( less than 1%)

hunters. Also they should take care of Oregon's wildlife to serve the MAJORITY of her population NOT the few

ranchers that make money off our land. Wildlife viewing brings in 17% more revenues than hunting. So alive

wildlife is worth more than dead. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/21/trophy-hunters-grizzly-

bear-hunting-canada

382 An understanding that top predators are extremely important in a natural system and that they should be more

the "managers" than

ODFW Director Recruitment Survey 11-17-14

Documents

Transcript of ODFW Director Recruitment Survey 11-17-14