October 14 - Michigan Achieves Event Presentation

© 2015 THE EDUCATION TRUST-MIDWEST

June 6, 2015

Collaborative EngagementWorking Together on a Shared Goal of Making Michigan a

Top 10 Education State

State Leadership Retreat October 14, 2015


Source:

Massachusetts

United States

United States (Public)

Michigan

-50 50 150 250 350 450 550 650

Korea, Republic of

Singapore

Chinese Taipei-CHN

Hong Kong, SAR

Japan

Massachusetts

Vermont

Minnesota

New Jersey

New Hampshire

Russian Federation

North Carolina

Maine

Wisconsin

Quebec-CAN

Montana

New York

North Dakota

Pennsylvania

Iowa

Alaska

Wyoming

Kansas

Virginia

Washington

Ohio

Indiana

Rhode Island

South Dakota

Colorado

Connecticut

DoDEA

Illinois

Israel

Texas

Delaware

Maryland

Finland

Florida

Oregon

Idaho

Ontario-CAN

Missouri

Nebraska

Utah

United States

Arkansas

United States (Public)

England-GRP

Slovenia

Alberta-CAN

Kentucky

Hungary

Australia

Hawaii

South Carolina

Lithuania

Arizona

Michigan

NAEP TIMSS Grade 8 – Math – Average Scale Scores - 2011

Massachusetts Near the Top Globally, Michigan Lags Far Behind Other Countries and States

U.S. States in a Global Context: NAEP-TIMSS Linking Study

2


Michigan Achieves Vision:

To make Michigan a top ten education state by 2030, starting by becoming top ten in the nation for third-grade

reading improvement by 2020.

3


Source:

Michigan One of Only Six States with Negative Improvement for Early Literacy Since 2003

Michigan

National public

-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

West VirginiaSouth Dakota

AlaskaMichigan

South CarolinaWisconsin

MissouriMontana

IowaMaine

North CarolinaIdaho

ConnecticutOregon

New YorkDelawareVermont

OhioTexas

IllinoisNorth Dakota

New MexicoNebraskaColorado

MississippiKansas

OklahomaUtah

New JerseyWyoming

WashingtonNew HampshireNational public

ArizonaMinnesota

MassachusettsArkansas

IndianaVirginia

KentuckyLouisiana

Rhode IslandHawaii

NevadaCalifornia

PennsylvaniaTennessee

GeorgiaFlorida

AlabamaMaryland

Average Scale Score Change, NAEP Grade 4 - Reading - All Students (2003-13)

NAEP Data Explorer, NCES (Proficient Scale Score = 238; Basic Scale Score = 208)

4


Source:


Michigan

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

260

Ave

rage

Sca

le S

core

NAEP Grade 4 – Reading – African American Students - 2013

NAEP Data Explorer, NCES (Proficient Scale Score = 238; Basic Scale Score = 208)

Michigan Near Bottom For African American Early Literacy Compared to Nation

5


Michigan White Students On Track to be 49th in Early Literacy by 2030 if We Stay on Our Current Path

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

260

270

2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029

Ave

rage

Sca

le S

core

NAEP Grade 4 – Reading – White Students

Michigan Achieves Path

Michigan Current Path

Maryland

National Public

49th

Source: NAEP Data Explorer, NCES (Proficient Scale Score = 238; Basic Scale Score = 208)

1st (Maryland)

6


Source:

Low-Income Students in Boston Perform at Drastically Higher Levels Than in Detroit

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

260

Ave

rage

Sca

le S

core

Grade 4 – NAEP Math (2013)

NAEP Data Explorer, NCES

Note: Basic Scale Score = 214; Proficient Scale Score = 249

Detroit

Boston

7


Source:

MI Losing Ground on 4th Grade Reading

Note: Basic Scale Score = 208; Proficient Scale Score = 238

NAEP Data Explorer, NCES

-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Michigan

National Public

Colorado

Washington

Indiana

Minnesota

Tennessee

Average Scale Score Change, NAEP Grade 4 - Reading - All Students (2011-13)

8


Panelists

• Amber Arellano, Executive Director, The Education Trust-Midwest

• Sara Heyburn, Executive Director, Tennessee State Board of Education

• Marc Hill, Chief Policy Officer, Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce

• Paul Reville, Francis Keppel Professor of Practice of Educational Policy

and Administration, Harvard University’s Graduate School of Education

9

JOURNEY TOWARD EQUITYAND EXCELLENCE

THE MASSACHUSETTSEXPERIENCE

PAUL REVILLE

Francis Keppel Professor o f Pract ice and Educat iona l Po l icy and Admin is t ra t ion

ACHIEVEMENTS - MCAS

In NAEP Reading and Math tests (4 th and 8th

grades), administered in 2005, 2009, 2011, and 2013, Massachusetts was 1st or tied for 1st on all four tests each year.

ACHIEVEMENTS - NAEP

TIMMS 2011

Eighth-graders ranked 2nd in Science

6th in Mathematics

PISA 2012 Results

ACHIEVEMENTS - INTERNATIONAL

Average Mathematics Science Reading

Massachusetts 514 527 527

U.S. 481 497 498

OECD 494 501 496

MCAS 2010 Results

GAPS - MCAS

MCAS 2013 Results

GAPS - MCAS

Proficient or Higher Grade 3 Grade 5 Grade 8

English Language Arts White: 65%Low-Income: 34%English Language Learners: 19%

White: 72%Low-Income: 46%


Mathematics White: 73%Low-Income: 49%English Language Learners: 39%



Science White: 59%Low-Income: 30%


Drop-out Rates

Black Males: 5.4%

White Males: 1.8%

Hispanic Males: 6.8%

Low-income students are 20% less likely to graduate high school on time

31% less likely to enroll in college

GAPS

Budget Pressure / Proposition 2½

Court Case

Business Involvement MBAE

Executive and Legislative Leadership

Grand Bargain

HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF REFORM

Lack of Goals

Lack of Performance Measurement

Lack of HR System

Uneven Performance and High Failure Rates

Unsupported Educators

Inadequate, Irrational Finance System

Lack of Choice and Competition

BUSINESS CONCERNS ABOUT EDUCATION SYSTEM

Standards, Assessments, and Accountability

System Improvements

Finance Reform and Reinvestment

EDUCATION REFORM ACT OF 1993

Leadership - Deep, Non-Partisan, Persistent

Clear, Powerful Equity and Excellence Rationale

High Expectations, Standards, and Stakes

Significant Investment in Capacity and Equity

Inclusive Implementation Approach

Long-term Commitment

IMPLEMENTATION SUCCESS

Shared Ownership in Building Standards

High Quality Assessments

Focus on Building Educator Accountability

Strengthening Districts

Central Role of Data

High Quality Charters and Other Innovations

Strengthened Accountability

Expanded Turn-arounds

Limited Attention to Time and Wrap -around

Balance on Teacher Evaluation

Race to the Top

Collaboration with Early and Higher Education

KEY STRATEGIES

Gap Closing, Sub Groups

Early Literacy

Turn-arounds

Career Readiness (STEM Inspiration Gap)

Inadequate Time

Problems Associated with Poverty

MAJOR CHALLENGES

Need for a “New Engine”

Schools Alone Cannot Do It

Limits of School Reform and Standards Paradigm

LOOKING AHEAD

Drives Achievement of “All Means All”

Braided Systems

Schools - Expanded, Extended and Differentiated

Health and Human Services Integrated

Out of School Learning Accessible

NEW ENGINE


Panelists

• Amber Arellano, Executive Director, The Education Trust-Midwest

• Sara Heyburn, Executive Director, Tennessee State Board of Education

• Marc Hill, Chief Policy Officer, Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce

• Paul Reville, Francis Keppel Professor of Practice of Educational Policy

and Administration, Harvard University’s Graduate School of Education

25


26

October 14 - Michigan Achieves Event Presentation

Documents

Transcript of October 14 - Michigan Achieves Event Presentation