OUTLINE of OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE at JAPANESE NPPs in FY 2009 and the ISOE ATC Activity
Occupational Exposure at Japanese Nuclear Power Plants
description
Transcript of Occupational Exposure at Japanese Nuclear Power Plants
1
Occupational Exposure at Japanese Nuclear Power Plants
2012 ISOE Asian ALARA Symposium
September 24- 25, 2012, JNES, Tokyo Japan
Yoshihisa HAYASHIDAJapan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization (JNES)
2
Nuclear Power Plants in Japanas of March 31, 2012
BWR PWR GCR Total
No. of Units 26 24 - 50
In Operation Output (MWe) 25,870 20,278 - 46,148
No. of Units 3 - - 3 Under
Construction Output (MWe) 4,141 - - 4,141
No. of Units 6 3 - 9
On Planning Output (MWe) 7,721 4,666 - 12,387
No. of Units 6 - 1 7 Under
Decommissioning Output (MWe) 4,192 - 166 4,358
3
Nuclear Power Plants in Japan
55 Units in Operation (PWR 23, BWR 32) as of March 31, 2006
女川福島第一
ふげん(2003年より廃止措置準備中)
敦賀
志賀
出力規模
50万kW未満 100万kW未満 100万kW以上 合計 53基 出力47,122MWe
7 8
TEPCO 1
55
22
7 8
1
555
Higashi Dori
Oma
Tomari
Onagawa
Tokai No. 2
IkataSendai
Genkai
Shimane
Kaminoseki
Takahama
Ohi
Mihama
Tsuruga
Tokai
(on a decommissioning stage since 2003)Fugen
Shika
Higashi Dori
Fukushima Daiichi
(On the decommissioning stage since 1998)
Namie-Odaka
Kashiwazaki-kariwa
33
Output scale In operationUnder Construction
On planning stageLess than 1,000,000kW 1,000,000kW
Total 50 Units 46,148MWe(PWR 24 units, BWR 26 units )
500,000kWLess than More than
Fukushima Daini
3
Hamaoka(Unit 1,2 On the decommissioning stage since 2009)
6
2
(Unit 1,2,3,4: On the decommissioning stage )
4
Average Individual Dose in Fiscal Year 2011(April 2011 – March 2012)
Plants Units Persons mSv/person
BWR 221 33,519 0.69
PWR 24 28,183 0.82
LWR(BWR+PWR)
46 61,702 0.75
1. Includes Hamaoka 1 & 2 under decommissioning, and dose not include Fukushima Daiichi (6 BWR)and Fukushima Daini (4 BWR)
5
Trend of Average Individual Dose
0
1
2
3
4
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11
Fiscal Year
Indi
vidu
al d
ose(
mSv/
pers
on)
0
50
100
150
200
Average Individual DoseNo. of Wokers exceeding 20 mSv/y
Per
son
*) Data exclude Fukushima Daiichi for FY 2010, and Fukushima Daiichi and Fukushima Daini for FY 2011.
6
Collective Dose in Fiscal Year 2011 (April 2011 – March 2012)
Plants Units Person-Sv Person-Sv/Unit
BWR 221 23.17 1.05
PWR 24 23.12 0.96
LWR (BWR
+PWR)
46 46.29 1.01
1. Includes Hamaoka 1 & 2 under decommissioning, and dose not include Fukushima Daiichi (6 BWR)and Fukushima Daini (4 BWR)
7
Trend of Average Collective Dose per Reactorand Capacity Factor
0
1
2
3
4
5
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11
Fiscal Year
Ave
rage
Col
lect
ive
Dos
e (P
erso
n.Sv/
Uni
t)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Average Collective Dose Cpacuty Factor
Cap
acut
y Fa
ctor
(%)
*) Dose data exclude Fukushima Daiichi for FY 2010, and Fukushima Daiichi and Fukushima Daini for FY 2011.
8
Trend of Capacity Factor by Month (January 2011 – August 2012)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
'11/1
'11/2
'11/3
'11/4
'11/5
'11/6
'11/7
'11/8
'11/9
'11/1
0
'11/1
1
'11/1
2'12
/1'12
/2'12
/3'12
/4'12
/5'12
/6'12
/7'12
/8
Year / Month
Cap
acity
Fac
tor (%
)
Capacity Factor
9
BWR Average Collective Dose per Reactor by Country(1980-2011)
*) Dose data exclude Fukushima Daiichi for FY 2010, and Fukushima Daiichi and Fukushima Daini for FY 2011.
0
5
10
15
'80 '81 '82 '83 '84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11
Year
Per
son.
Sv/
Uni
t
J apanU.S.A.GermanySwedenFinland
10
PWR Average Collective Dose per Reactor by Country(1980-2011)
0
5
10
15
'80 '81 '82 '83 '84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11
Year
Per
son.
Sv/
Uni
t
J apanU.S.A.GermanyFranceKorea, Republic of.
11
Average Collective Dose by Site (BWR)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Average Plant Age by Site (Year)
Ave
rage
Col
lect
ive
Dos
e(p
erso
n.Sv/
unit)
BWR
12
Average Collective Dose by Site (PWR)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0 10 20 30 40 50Average Plant Age by Site (Year)
Ave
rage
Col
lect
ive
Dos
e(p
erso
n.Sv/
unit)
PWR
13
Contribution of outage collective dose to annual collective dose (5-year average)
50
60
70
80
90
100
2003-2007 2004-2008 2005-2009 2006-2010
Fiscal Year
Rat
io(%
)
BWRPWRLWR(BWR+PWR)
14
0
2
4
6
8
10
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 年 度
(Sv
/)
線量人・
定検
従来型 改良型
Fiscal year
(per
son.
Sv/
outa
ge)
Comparison of outage collective dose between conventional type and improved type
(LWR)
Conventional type: Plant before 1982
Improved type: Plant after 1983
Avera
ge C
olle
ctiv
e D
ose
15
0
2
4
6
8
10
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 年 度
(Sv
/)
線量人・
定検
従来型 改良型
(per
son.
Sv/
outa
ge)
Fiscal year
Comparison of outage collective dose between conventional type and improved type
(BWR)
Conventional type: Plant before 1982
Improved type: Plant after 1983
Avera
ge C
olle
ctiv
e D
ose
16
0
2
4
6
8
10
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 年 度
(Sv
/)
線量人・
定検
従来型 改良型
(per
son.
Sv/
outa
ge)
Fiscal year
Comparison of outage collective dose between conventional type and improved type
(PWR)
Conventional type: Plant before 1982
Improved type: Plant after 1983
Avera
ge C
olle
ctiv
e D
ose
17
Correlation between Elapsed time after commencement of commercial operation and
Exposure per outage (Japanese BWR)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 10 20 30 40 50
Elapsed time after commencement of commercial operation (year)
Exp
osu
re (
per
son
-Sv/
ou
tag
e)
BWR 2010
BWR 2009
BWR 2008
18
Correlation between Elapsed time after commencement of commercial operation and
Exposure per outage (Japanese PWR)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 10 20 30 40 50Elapsed time after commencement of commercial operation (year)
Exp
osu
re (
per
son
-Sv/
ou
tag
e)
PWR 2010
PWR 2009
PWR 2008
19
Thank you for your attention !!