Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

18
The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies: relevance and roles Reinhard Busse & Suszy Lessof

Transcript of Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

Page 1: Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

The European Observatory

on Health Systems and

Policies: relevance and roles

Reinhard Busse & Suszy Lessof

Page 2: Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

Central Principles

• Comparative description of health systems & policies and analysis of existing evidence

• Bridge the gap between scientific evidence and the needs of policy makers

• Development of practical lessons and options in health policy making

2

Page 3: Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

3

Our basic assumption: Evidence and evaluation for better health systems

Publishedliterature

„Grey“literature

Countryexperience

Page 4: Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

Our basic assumption: Evidence and evaluation for better health systems

Active &adequate

dissemination

4

Page 5: Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

Our basic assumption: Evidence and evaluation for better health systems

& responsiveness& financial protection& equity & efficiency

5

Page 6: Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

6

Our basic assumption: Evidence and evaluation for better health systems

Page 7: Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

Our basic assumption: Evidence and evaluation for better health systems

Performance assessment as evidence

7

Page 8: Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

Central Principles

• Comparative description of health systems & policies and analysis of existing evidence

• Bridge the gap between scientific evidence and the needs of policy makers

• Development of practical lessons and options in health policy making

• Partnership

8

Page 9: Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

How partnership is key

• Evidence on knowledge transfer – Knowing what is relevant – Knowing how to present it so it is accessible – Being timely – Being trusted

• Partners are key to bridging the gap between scientific evidence and policy makers

9

Page 10: Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

• International agencies: WHO Regional Office for Europe, the European Commission, the World Bank, the European Investment Bank

• National and regional governments: Belgium, Finland, France, Greece, Ireland, Norway, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and Slovenia, as well as the Veneto Region of Italy

• Academia: the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM)

• Social insurance: UNCAM (association of sickness funds), France

The European Observatory partnership

10

Page 11: Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

Governance

• Steering Committees twice a year • WHO and the Chair for day to day review • Ongoing updates, sharing of drafts, discussions• Independent, academic research directors• A professional and dedicated Secretariat

11

Page 12: Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

WHO and management

• An international platform – Employment – Legal status – Financial stability and credibility

• Access to governments • Credibility

12

Page 13: Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

Research teams, hubs and management

• Hubs based in academia– Berlin– LSE– LSHTM

• Academic inputs – networks • Culture and quality

13

Page 14: Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

The Observatory’s core mission

We support and promote evidence-based health policy-making through comprehensive and rigorous analysis of the dynamics of health care systems in Europe:

• Country monitoring• Health systems and policy analysis• Assessing & comparing performance• Disseminating the evidence

14

Page 15: Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

• Health Systems Reviews (HiT) profiles provide a detailed description and assessment,

• follow a standardised format• are based on a « template »

with questions to authors, • cover all European and some

other OECD countries

details next session

1. Country monitoring

15

Page 16: Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

2. Health systems and policy analysis

Selection of topics: • relevance to policy/ open questions• can build on existing primary

research – but good comparative/ summarising work lacking

• detailed proposal & discussion in Steering Committee

16

Page 17: Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

2. Health systems and policy analysis

Conduct of work: • Lead researchers/ editors & network

of researchers/ authors • Review of evidence & country case

studies• Workshop with authors & policy-

makersResulting work:• Policy options and (non normative)

lessons• Book & policy-dialogues etc. 17

Page 18: Obs presentation montevideo 2010 final 1

Financing/ funding/ purchasing/ paymentProvision (by sector: hospitals, primary care ...)

Provision (by patient group: mental health, chronic diseases, infectious diseases, migrants ...)

Human resourcesQuality / Health Technology Assessment

Governance/ regulation (including role of EU)Sub regional / comparative (Central/ eastern Europe, countries with social health insurance ...)

Public health

Topic areas covered

18