Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise

7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 1/36

COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

8

9

1

11

12

13

14

15

1

1

18

19

2

21

22

23

24

25

2

2

28

Michael K. Friedland (SBN 157,217)[email protected] K. Katzenellenbogen (SBN 223,370)[email protected] S. Razai (SBN 246,922)[email protected]

Samantha Y. Hsu (SBN 285,853)[email protected], MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 Main Street, Fourteenth FloorIrvine, CA 92614

Telephone: (949) 760-0404Facsimile: (949) 760-9502

Attorneys for Plaintiff OAKLEY, INC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLEY , INC., a Washingtoncorporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

JAY -Y ENTERPRISE CO., INC, aCalifornia corporation,

Defendant.

))))

)))))))

Civil Action No.

COMPLAINT FORPATENT INFRINGEMENT

DEMAND FOR J URY TRIAL

'13CV0866 JMGPC

Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 of 36



-1- COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

8

9

1

11

12

13

14

15

1

1

18

19

2

21

22

23

24

25

2

2

28

Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. (“Oakley”) hereby complains of Defendant Jay-Y

Enterprise Co., Inc. (“Defendant” or “Jay-Y”) and alleges as follows:

I. J URISDICTION AND VENUE

1. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 1338, as it arises under the patent laws of the United

States.

2. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because

Defendant has a continuous, systematic, and substantial presence within this

judicial district, including by selling and offering for sale infringing products in

this judicial district, and by committing acts of patent infringement in this

judicial district, including but not limited to selling infringing eyewear directly

to consumers and/or retailers in this district and selling into the stream of

commerce knowing such products would be sold in California and this district,

which acts form a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to

Oakley’s claim.

3. Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. §1391 (b)

and (c), and 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b).

II . THE PARTIES

4. Oakley is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of

the State of Washington, having its principal place of business at One Icon,

Foothill Ranch, California 92610.

5. Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Defendant

Jay-Y is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of California, having its principal place of business at 632 New York Drive,

Pomona, California 91768.

6. Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Defendant

has committed the acts alleged herein within this judicial district.

/ / /




-2- COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

8

9

1

11

12

13

14

15

1

1

18

19

2

21

22

23

24

25

2

2

28

II I . GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

7. Oakley has been actively engaged in the manufacture and sale of

high quality eyewear since at least 1985. Oakley is the manufacturer and

retailer of several lines of eyewear that have enjoyed substantial success and are

protected by various intellectual property rights owned by Oakley.

8. On June 10, 1997, the United States Patent and Trademark Office

duly and lawfully issued United States Patent No. 5,638,145 (“the ’145 patent”),

entitled “Vented Eyeglass Lens.” Oakley is the owner by assignment of all

right, title, and interest in the ’145 patent. A true and correct copy of the ’145

patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

9. On May 29, 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office

duly and lawfully issued United States Design Patent No. D543,572 (“the D572

patent”), entitled “Eyeglass.” Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right,

title, and interest in the D572 patent. A true and correct copy of the D572 patent

is attached hereto as Exhibit B.

10. On June 1, 2010, the United States Patent and Trademark Office

duly and lawfully issued United States Design Patent No. D616,919 (“the D919

patent”), entitled “Eyeglass Front.” Oakley is the owner by assignment of all

right, title, and interest in the D919 patent. A true and correct copy of the D919

patent is attached hereto as Exhibit C.

11. On August 26, 2003, the United States Patent and Trademark

Office duly and lawfully issued United States Design Patent No. D478,929 (“the

D929 patent”), entitled “Eyeglass.” Oakley is the owner by assignment of allright, title, and interest in the D929 patent. A true and correct copy of the D929

patent is attached hereto as Exhibit D.

12. Defendant manufactures, uses, sells, offers for sale and/or imports

into the United States eyewear that infringe Oakley’s intellectual property

rights.




-3- COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

8

9

1

11

12

13

14

15

1

1

18

19

2

21

22

23

24

25

2

2

28

13. Oakley has provided the public with constructive notice of its

patent rights pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 287.

IV. CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(Patent Infringement)(35 U.S.C. § 271)

14. Oakley repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-13 of

this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.

15. This is a claim for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271.

16. Defendant, through its agents, employees and servants, has, and

continues to, knowingly, intentionally and willfully directly infringe, engage in

acts of contributory infringement, and/or induce the infringement of the ’145

patent by directly and/or indirectly making, using, selling, offering for sale

and/or importing eyewear that are covered by the ’145 patent, including

Defendant’s XLoop sunglass model “8X3579.”

17. Defendant’s acts of infringement of the ’145 patent were

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Defendant had actual

and/or constructive knowledge of the ’145 patent and its actions constitute

willful and intentional infringement of the ’145 patent. Defendant infringed the

’145 patent with reckless disregard of Oakley’s patent rights. Defendant knew,

or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions

constituted infringement of the ’145 patent. Defendant’s acts of infringement of

the ’145 patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its

industry.18. Defendant, through its agents, employees and servants, has, and


acts of contributory infringement, and/or induce the infringement of the D572


/ / /




-4- COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

8

9

1

11

12

13

14

15

1

1

18

19

2

21

22

23

24

25

2

2

28

and/or importing eyewear that are covered by the D572 patent, including

Defendant’s XLoop sunglass model “8X2292.”

19. Defendant’s acts of infringement of the D572 patent were


and/or constructive knowledge of the D572 patent and its actions constitute

willful and intentional infringement of the D572 patent. Defendant infringed

the D572 patent with reckless disregard of Oakley’s patent rights. Defendant

knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions

constituted infringement of the D572 patent. Defendant’s acts of infringement

of the D572 patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its

industry.





and/or importing eyewear that are covered by the D919 patent, including

Defendant’s Biohazard sunglass model “8BZ66121.”






knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actionsconstituted infringement of the D919 patent. Defendant’s acts of infringement


industry.






-5- COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

8

9

1

11

12

13

14

15

1

1

18

19

2

21

22

23

24

25

2

2

28



and/or importing eyewear that are covered by one or more claims of the D929

patent, including Defendant’s Polarized XLoop sunglass model “PZ/X2056”

and XLoop sunglass model “8X2056.”






knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions

constituted infringement of the D929 patent. Defendant’s acts of infringement


industry.

24. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant’s patent

infringement, Defendant has derived and received gains, profits, and advantages

in an amount not presently known to Oakley.

25. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284, Oakley is entitled to damages for

Defendant’s infringing acts and treble damages together with interests and costs

as fixed by this Court.

26. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 289, Oakley is entitled to Defendant’s total

profits from the sale of eyewear that infringe any one of Oakley’s design

patents.27. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, Oakley is entitled to reasonable

attorneys’ fees for the necessity of bringing this claim.

28. Due to the aforesaid infringing acts, Oakley has suffered great and

irreparable injury, for which Oakley has no adequate remedy at law.

/ / /




-6- COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

8

9

1

11

12

13

14

15

1

1

18

19

2

21

22

23

24

25

2

2

28

29. Defendant continues to directly and/or indirectly infringe Oakley’s

patents to the great and irreparable injury of Oakley, unless enjoined by this

Court.

WHEREFORE, Oakley prays for judgment in its favor against Defendant

for the following relief:

A. An Order adjudging Defendant to have willfully infringed the ’145

patent, the D572 patent, the D919 patent, and the D929 patent under 35 U.S.C. §

271;

B. A preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining Defendant, its

respective officers, directors, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, and

those persons in active concert or participation with Defendant, from directly or

indirectly infringing the ’145 patent, the D572 patent, the D919 patent, or the

D929 patent patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271;

C. That pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284, Defendant account for all gains,

profits, and advantages derived from Defendant’s infringement and that

Defendant pay to Oakley all damages suffered by Oakley as a result of

Defendant’s infringement;

D. That pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 289, Defendant account for its total

profit from Defendant’s infringement of any of Oakley’s design patents;

E. An Order for a trebling of damages and/or exemplary damages

because of Defendant’s willful conduct pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284;

F. An Order adjudging that this is an exceptional case;

F. An award to Oakley of the attorneys’ fees, expenses, and costsincurred by Oakley in connection with this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285;

H. An award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs of

this action against Defendant;

I. That Oakley have and recover the costs of this civil action,

including reasonable attorneys’ fees;




-7- COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

8

9

1

11

12

13

14

15

1

1

18

19

2

21

22

23

24

25

2

2

28

J. An award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs of

this action against Defendant; and,

K. Such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and

proper.

KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP

Dated: April 10, 2013 By: /s/ Ali S. RazaiMichael K. FriedlandLauren Keller KatzenellenbogenAli S. Razai

Samantha Y. HsuAttorneys for Plaintiff OAKLEY, INC




-8- COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

8

9

1

11

12

13

14

15

1

1

18

19

2

21

22

23

24

25

2

2

28

DEMAND FOR J URY TRIAL

Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so

triable.

KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP

Dated: April 10, 2013 By: /s/ Ali S. Razai Michael K. FriedlandLauren Keller KatzenellenbogenSamantha Y. HsuAli S. Razai

Attorneys for Plaintiff

OAKLEY, INC

15198452




-i- Table of Exhibits

1

2

3

4

5

8

9

1

11

12

13

14

15

1

1

18

19

2

21

22

23

24

25

2

2

28

TABLE OF EXHIBITS

Page #

Exhibit A ............................................................................................................... 1

Exhibit B ............................................................................................................... 7

Exhibit C ............................................................................................................. 12

Exhibit D ............................................................................................................. 16

15197503




EXHIBIT A




EXHIBIT B



http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 19/36Exhibit BPage 7




EXHIBIT C



http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 25/36Exhibit CPage 12




EXHIBIT D




65HY CIVIL COVER SHEET7KH-6FLYLOFRYHUVKHHWDQGWKHLQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDLQHGKHUHLQQHLWKHUUHSODFHQRUVXSSOHPHQWWKHILOLQJDQGVHUYLFHRISOHDGLQJVRURWKHUSDSHUVDVUHTXLUHGE\ODZH[FHSW

URYLGHGE\ORFDOUXOHVRIFRXUW7KLVIRUPDSSURYHGE\WKH-XGLFLDO&RQIHUHQFHRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVLQ6HSWHPEHULVUHTXLUHGIRUWKHXVHRIWKH&OHUNRI&RXUWIRUWKHXUSRVHRILQLWLDWLQJWKHFLYLOGRFNHWVKHHW(SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)

. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS

(b) &RX QW\R I5 HVLGHQFHRI)LUVW/LVWHG3ODLQWLII & RX QW\RI5 HVLGHQFHRI)LUVW/LVWHG'HIHQG DQW

(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)

127( ,1/$1'&21'(01$7,21&$6(686(7+(/2&$7,212)7+(75$&72)/$1',192/9('

(c)$WWRUQH\V(Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) $WWRUQH\V(If Known)

I. BASIS OF JURISDICTION(Place an “X” in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an “X” in One Box for

(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant

u 86*RYHUQPHQW u )HGHUDO4XHVWLRQ PTF DEF PTF D

3ODLQWLII (U.S. Government Not a Party) &LWL]HQRI7KLV6WDWH u u ,QFRUSRUDWHGor 3ULQFLSDO3ODFH u

RI%XVLQHVV,Q7KLV6WDWH

u 86*RYHUQPHQW u 'LYHUVLW\ &LWL]HQRI$QRWKHU6WDWH u u ,QFRUSRUDWHGand 3ULQFLSDO3ODFH u

'HIHQGDQW (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) RI%XVLQHVV,Q$QRWKHU6WDWH

&LWL]HQRU6XEMHFWRID u u )RUHLJQ1DWLRQ u

)RUHLJQ&RXQWU\

V. NATURE OF SUIT(Place an “X” in One Box Only)CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES

u ,QVXUDQFH PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY u 'UXJ5HODWHG6HL]XUH u $SSHDO86& u )DOVH&ODLPV$FW

u 0DULQH u $LUSODQH u 3HUVRQDO,QMXU\ RI3URSHUW\86& u :LWKGUDZDO u 6WDWH5HDSSRUWLRQP

u 0LOOHU$FW u $LUSODQH3URGXFW 3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ u 2WKHU 86& u $QWLWUXVW

u 1HJRWLDEOH,QVWUXPHQW /LDELOLW\ u +HDOWK&DUH u %DQNVDQG%DQNLQJ

u 5HFRYHU\RI2YHUSD\PHQW u $VVDXOW/LEHO 3KDUPDFHXWLFDO PROPERTY RIGHTS u &RPPHUFH

(QIRUFHPHQWRI-XGJPHQW 6ODQGHU 3HUVRQDO,QM XU\ u &RS\ULJKWV u 'HSRUWDWLRQ

u 0HGLFDUH$FW u )HGHUDO(PSOR\HUV¶ 3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ u 3DWHQW u 5DFNHWHHU,QIOXHQFH

u 5HFRYHU\RI'HIDXOWHG /LDELOLW\ u $VEHVWRV3HUVRQDO u 7UDGHPDUN &RUUXSW2UJDQL]DWLR

6WXGHQW/RDQV u 0DULQH ,QMXU\3URGXFW u &RQVXPHU&UHGLW

([FOXGHV9HWHUDQV u 0D ULQH 3 UR GX FW /LD ELOL W\ LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY u &DEOH6DW79

u 5HFRYHU\RI2YHUSD\PHQW /LDELOLW\ PERSONAL PROPERTY u )DLU/DERU6WDQGDUGV u +,$II u 6HFXULWLHV&RPPRG

RI9HWHUDQ¶V%HQHILWV u 0RWRU9HKLFOH u 2WKHU)UDXG $FW u %O DFN/ XQJ ([FKDQJH

u 6WRFNKROGHUV¶6XLWV u 0RWRU9HKLFOH u 7UXWKLQ/HQGLQJ u /DERU0DQDJHPHQW u ',:&',::J u 2WKHU6WDWXWRU\$FW

u 2WKHU&RQWUDFW 3URGXFW/LDELOLW \ u 2WKH U3 HU VRQ DO 5HODWLR QV u 66,'7LWOH;9, u $JULFXOWXUDO$FWV

u &RQWUDFW3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ u 2 WK HU 3 HU VR QD O 3U RS HU W\ 'D PD JH u 5DLOZD\/DERU$FW u 56,J u (QYLURQPHQWDO0DWW

u )UDQFKLVH ,QMXU\ u 3URSHUW\'DPDJH u )DPLO\DQG0HGLFDO u )UHHGRPRI,QIRUPD

u 3HUVRQDO,QMXU\ 3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ /HDYH$FW $FW0HGLFDO0DOSUDFWLFH u 2WKHU/DERU/LWLJDWLRQ u $UELWUDWLRQ

REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS u (PSOR\HH5HWLUHPHQW FEDERAL TAX SUITS u $GPLQLVWUDWLYH3URF

u /DQG&RQGHPQDWLRQ u 2WKHU&LYLO5LJKWV Habeas Corpus: ,QFRPH6HFXULW\$FW u 7D[HV863ODLQWLII $FW5HYLHZRU$SSH

u )RUHFORVXUH u 9RWLQJ u $OLHQ'HWDLQHH RU'HIHQGDQW $JHQF\'HFLVLRQ

u 5HQW/HDVH(MHFWPHQW u (PSOR\PHQW u 0RWLRQVWR9DFDWH u ,56²7KLUG3DUW\ u &RQVWLWXWLRQDOLW\RI

u 7RUWVWR/DQG u +RXVLQJ 6HQWHQFH 86& 6WDWH6WDWXWHV

u 7RUW3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ $FFRPPRGDWLRQV u *HQHUDO

u $OO2WKHU5HDO3URSHUW\ u $PHUZ'LVDELOLWLHV u 'HDWK3HQDOW\ IMMIGRATION

(PSOR\PHQW Other: u 1DWXUDOL]DWLRQ$SSOLFDWLRQu $PHUZ'LVDELOLWLHV u 0DQGDPXV2WKHU u 2WKHU,PPLJUDWLRQ

2WKHU u &LYLO5LJ KWV $F WLRQV

u (GXFDWLRQ u 3ULVRQ&RQGLWLRQ

u &LYLO'HWDLQHH

&RQGLWLRQVRI

&RQILQHPHQW

V. ORIGIN(Place an “X” in One Box Only)

u 2ULJLQDO3URFHHGLQJ

u 5HPRYHGIURP6WDWH&RXUW

u 5HPDQGHGIURP$SSHOODWH&RXUW

u 5HLQVWDWHGRU 5HRSHQHG

u 7UDQVIHUUHGIURP$QRWKHU'LVWULFW(specify)

u 0XOWLGLVWULFW/LWLJDWLRQ

VI. CAUSE OF ACTION

&LWHWKH86&LYLO6WDWXWHXQGHUZKLFK\RXDUHILOLQJ(Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity )

%ULHIGHVFULSWLRQRIFDXVH

VII. REQUESTED IN

COMPLAINT:

u &+(&.,)7+,6,6$CLASS ACTION

81'(558/()5&Y3

DEMAND $ &+(&.<(6RQO\LIGHPDQGHGLQFRPSODLQW

JURY DEMAND: u <HV u 1R

VIII. RELATED CASE(S)

IF ANY(See instructions):

-8'*( '2&.(7180%(5

'$7( 6,*1$785(2)$77251(<2)5(&25'

FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

5(&(,37 $02817 $33/<,1*,)3 -8'*( 0$*-8'*(

OAKLEY, INC., a Washington corporation

Michael K. Friedland, Lauren K. Katzenellenbogen, Ali S. RazaiKNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 Main St., 14th Fl., Irvine, CA 92614

JAY Y ENTERPRISES CO., INC., a California corporation

35 U.S.C. Sec. 271

Patent Infringement of U.S Patent Nos. 5638145, D543572, D616919, and D478929

Cathy Ann Bencivengo 12-CV-2458

04/10/2013 /s/Ali S. Razai

To be determined

'13CV0866 JMAGPC




-65HYHUVH5HY

INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44

$XWKRULW\)RU&LYLO&RYHU6KHHW

7KH-6FLYLOFRYHUVKHHWDQGWKHLQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDLQHGKHUHLQQHLWKHUUHSODFHVQRUVXSSOHPHQWVWKHILOLQJVDQGVHUYLFHRISOHDGLQJRURWKHUSDSHUVDV

UHTXLUHGE\ODZH[FHSWDVSURYLGHGE\ORFDOUXOHVRIFRXUW7KLVIRUPDSSURYHGE\WKH-XGLFLDO&RQIHUHQFHRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVLQ6HSWHPEHULV

UHTXLUHGIRUWKHXVHRIWKH&OHUNRI&RXUWIRUWKHSXUSRVHRILQLWLDWLQJWKHFLYLOGRFNHWVKHHW&RQVHTXHQWO\DFLYLOFRYHUVKHHWLVVXEPLWWHGWRWKH&OHUNR

&RXUWIRUHDFKFLYLOFRPSODLQWILOHG7KHDWWRUQH\ILOLQJDFDVHVKRXOGFRPSOHWHWKHIRUPDVIROORZV

I.(a) Plaintiffs-Defendants.(QWHUQDPHVODVWILUVWPLGGOHLQLWLDORISODLQWLIIDQGGHIHQGDQW,IWKHSODLQWLIIRUGHIHQGDQWLVDJRYHUQPHQWDJHQF\XV

RQO\WKHIXOOQDPHRUVWDQGDUGDEEUHYLDWLRQV,IWKHSODLQWLIIRUGHIHQGDQWLVDQRIILFLDOZLWKLQDJRYHUQPHQWDJHQF\LGHQWLI\ILUVWWKHDJHQF\DQGWKHQWKHRIILFLDOJLYLQJERWKQDPHDQGWLWOH

(b) County of Residence.)RUHDFKFLYLOFDVHILOHGH[FHSW86SODLQWLIIFDVHVHQWHUWKHQDPHRIWKHFRXQW\ZKHUHWKHILUVWOLVWHGSODLQWLIIUHVLGHVDW

WLPHRIILOLQJ,Q86SODLQWLIIFDVHVHQWHUWKHQDPHRIWKHFRXQW\LQZKLFKWKHILUVWOLVWHGGHIHQGDQWUHVLGHVDWWKHWLPHRIILOLQJ127(,QODQ

FRQGHPQDWLRQFDVHVWKHFRXQW\RIUHVLGHQFHRIWKHGHIHQGDQWLVWKHORFDWLRQRIWKHWUDFWRIODQGLQYROYHG

(c) Attorneys.(QWHUWKHILUPQDPHDGGUHVVWHOHSKRQHQXPEHUDQGDWWRUQH\RIUHFRUG,IWKHUHDUHVHYHUDODWWRUQH\VOLVWWKHPRQDQDWWDFKPHQWQR

LQWKLVVHFWLRQVHHDWWDFKPHQW

II. Jurisdiction.7KHEDVLVRIMXULVGLFWLRQLVVHWIRUWKXQGHU5XOHD)5&Y3ZKLFKUHTXLUHVWKDWMXULVGLFWLRQVEHVKRZQLQSOHDGLQJV3ODFHDQ

LQRQHRIWKHER[HV,IWKHUHLVPRUHWKDQRQHEDVLVRIMXULVGLFWLRQSUHFHGHQFHLVJLYHQLQWKHRUGHUVKRZQEHORZ

8QLWHG6WDWHVSODLQWLII-XULVGLFWLRQEDVHGRQ86&DQG6XLWVE\DJHQFLHVDQGRIILFHUVRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVDUHLQFOXGHGKHUH

8QLWHG6WDWHVGHIHQGDQW:KHQWKHSODLQWLIILVVXLQJWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVLWVRIILFHUVRUDJHQFLHVSODFHDQ;LQWKLVER[

)HGHUDOTXHVWLRQ7KLVUHIHUVWRVXLWVXQGHU86&ZKHUHMXULVGLFWLRQDULVHVXQGHUWKH&RQVWLWXWLRQRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVDQDPHQGP

WRWKH&RQVWLWXWLRQDQDFWRI&RQJUHVVRUDWUHDW\RIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV,QFDVHVZKHUHWKH86LVDSDUW\WKH86SODLQWLIIRUGHIHQGDQWFRGHWDN

SUHFHGHQFHDQGER[RUVKRXOGEHPDUNHG

'LYHUVLW\RIFLWL]HQVKLS7KLVUHIHUVWRVXLWVXQGHU86&ZKHUHSDUWLHVDUHFLWL]HQVRIGLIIHUHQWVWDWHV:KHQ%R[LVFKHFNHGWKH

FLWL]HQVKLSRIWKHGLIIHUHQWSDUWLHVPXVWEHFKHFNHG. 6HH6HFWLRQ,,,EHORZ; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity

cases.

III. Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties.7KLVVHFWLRQRIWKH-6LVWREHFRPSOHWHGLIGLYHUVLW\RIFLWL]HQVKLSZDVLQGLFDWHGDERYH0DUN

VHFWLRQIRUHDFKSULQFLSDOSDUW\

IV. Nature of Suit.3ODFHDQ;LQWKHDSSURSULDWHER[,IWKHQDWXUHRIVXLWFDQQRWEHGHWHUPLQHGEHVXUHWKHFDXVHRIDFWLRQLQ6HFWLRQ9,EHORZ

VXIILFLHQWWRHQDEOHWKHGHSXW\FOHUNRUWKHVWDWLVWLFDOFOHUNVLQWKH$GPLQLVWUDWLYH2IILFHWRGHWHUPLQHWKHQDWXUHRIVXLW,IWKHFDXVHILWVPRUHWK

RQHQDWXUHRIVXLWVHOHFWWKHPRVWGHILQLWLYH

V. Origin.3ODFHDQ;LQRQHRIWKHVL[ER[HV

2ULJLQDO3URFHHGLQJV&DVHVZKLFKRULJLQDWHLQWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVGLVWULFWFRXUWV

5HPRYHGIURP6WDWH&RXUW3URFHHGLQJVLQLWLDWHGLQVWDWHFRXUWVPD\EHUHPRYHGWRWKHGLVWULFWFRXUWVXQGHU7LWOH86&6HFWLRQ

:KHQWKHSHWLWLRQIRUUHPRYDOLVJUDQWHGFKHFNWKLVER[5HPDQGHGIURP$SSHOODWH&RXUW&KHFNWKLVER[IRUFDVHVUHPDQGHGWRWKHGLVWULFWFRXUWIRUIXUWKHUDFWLRQ8VHWKHGDWHRIUHPDQGDVWKHILOL

GDWH

5HLQVWDWHGRU5HRSHQHG&KHFNWKLVER[IRUFDVHVUHLQVWDWHGRUUHRSHQHGLQWKHGLVWULFWFRXUW8VHWKHUHRSHQLQJGDWHDVWKHILOLQJGDWH

7UDQVIHUUHGIURP$QRWKHU'LVWULFW)RUFDVHVWUDQVIHUUHGXQGHU7LWOH86&6HFWLRQD'RQRWXVHWKLVIRUZLWKLQGLVWULFWWUDQVIHUVR

PXOWLGLVWULFWOLWLJDWLRQWUDQVIHUV

0XOWLGLVWULFW/LWLJDWLRQ&KHFNWKLVER[ZKHQDPXOWLGLVWULFWFDVHLVWUDQVIHUUHGLQWRWKHGLVWULFWXQGHUDXWKRULW\RI7LWOH86&6HFWLRQ

:KHQWKLVER[LVFKHFNHGGRQRWFKHFNDERYH

VI. Cause of Action.5HSRUWWKHFLYLOVWDWXWHGLUHFWO\UHODWHGWRWKHFDXVHRIDFWLRQDQGJLYHDEULHIGHVFULSWLRQRIWKHFDXVHDo not cite jurisdiction

statutes unless diversity. ([DPSOH86&LYLO6WDWXWH86&%ULHI'HVFULSWLRQ8QDXWKRUL]HGUHFHSWLRQRIFDEOHVHUYLFH

VII. Requested in Complaint.&ODVV$FWLRQ3ODFHDQ;LQWKLVER[LI\RXDUHILOLQJDFODVVDFWLRQXQGHU5XOH)5&Y3

'HPDQG,QWKLVVSDFHHQWHUWKHDFWXDOGROODUDPRXQWEHLQJGHPDQGHGRULQGLFDWHRWKHUGHPDQGVXFKDVDSUHOLPLQDU\LQMXQFWLRQ

-XU\'HPDQG&KHFNWKHDSSURSULDWHER[WRLQGLFDWHZKHWKHURUQRWDMXU\LVEHLQJGHPDQGHG

VIII. Related Cases.7KLVVHFWLRQRIWKH-6LVXVHGWRUHIHUHQFHUHODWHGSHQGLQJFDVHVLIDQ\,IWKHUHDUHUHODWHGSHQGLQJFDVHVLQVHUWWKHGRFNHW

QXPEHUVDQGWKHFRUUHVSRQGLQJMXGJHQDPHVIRUVXFKFDVHV

Date and Attorney Signature.'DWHDQGVLJQWKHFLYLOFRYHUVKHHW


Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise

Documents

Transcript of Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise