Oakland County Executive’s County Executive’s Recommended FY 2016 – FY 2018 Triennial Budget...
-
Upload
vuongtuong -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
4
Transcript of Oakland County Executive’s County Executive’s Recommended FY 2016 – FY 2018 Triennial Budget...
Oakland County Executive’s
Recommended
FY 2016 – FY 2018 Triennial Budget
Presentation to the Board of Commissioners July 16, 2015
Reduced and Reorganized
2008 through 2011
Budgetary Focus Has Transitioned
Declining property tax revenues
Budget task allocations
Retirement incentive in 2008
300 FTE positions deleted
Departments and programs reorganized
Salary decreases in FY 2010 & FY 2011
Healthcare plan modifications
Accelerated reductions to generate savings for long-term sustainability
Reduced and Reorganized
Maintained and Stabilized
2008 through 2011
2012 through 2015
Budgetary Focus Has Transitioned
Property values stabilized
No new budget tasks
Decreased reliance on budgeted use of fund balance
Salary increases in FY 2014 & FY 2015
Fully funded pension & retiree healthcare plans
Reduced and Reorganized
Maintained and Stabilized
Reinvest for Sustainability
2008 through 2011
2012 through 2015
2016 and Beyond
Budgetary Focus Has Transitioned
Distinguished Budget Presentation Award
Since 1984
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting
Since 1991
Award for Outstanding Achievement in Popular Annual Financial Reporting
Since 1997
AAAAwardsTRIPLE
LEADERS WORKING TOGETHER
Board of Commissioners
Jessica Cooper
Prosecutor
Michael Bouchard
Sheriff
Lisa Brown Clerk
Andy Meisner Treasurer
Jim Nash Water
Resources Commissioner
L. Brooks Patterson
County Executive
Nanci Grant Circuit Court
Elizabeth Pezzetti Probate Court
Julie Nicholson District Court
Recommendation Highlights
Another property tax rate reduction in 2016
Full funding of revenue sharing
Increase for capital improvement program
Funding for building security enhancements
Use of fund balance
General salary increase for each of the next 3 years
Reinstate County match for deferred compensation
Increase contribution for retiree health savings
FY 2016 – FY 2018 Recommended Budget
The Recommended Triennial Budget is balanced for the next three fiscal years
FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
General Fund/General Purpose $428,870,550 $437,176,790 $441,810,251
Special Revenue & Proprietary $396,197,060 $394,878,690 $393,656,422
Total All Funds Recommended Budget $825,067,610 $832,055,480 $835,466,673
Percentage Change From Prior Year 2.2% 0.8% 0.4%
Property Tax Revenue
Recommended property tax revenue budget adjusted for three primary factors:
Increase for change in estimated future taxable value
Reduction in County general operating millage rate
Offset (reduction) for increased capture of County tax revenue for use in tax increment financing (TIF) districts
Oakland County, Michigan
Percentage Change in Assessed and Taxable Values
4.7
9%
4.5
0%
1.0
6%
1.1
7%
-3.6
7%
-8.9
0%
-14
.90
%
-12
.50
%
-3.0
8%
1.1
6%
7.1
1%
10
.39
%
5.2
8%
5.1
4%
5.5
6%
4.1
6%
0.0
4%
-3.6
0%
-11
.75
% -7
.78
% -3
.08
%
0.0
0%
1.6
5%
3.6
9%
3.0
0%
4.0
0%
4.0
0%
-20.00%
-15.00%
-10.00%
-5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016* 2017* 2018*
*estimated for 2016 - 2018
Oakland County, MI Percentage Change in Assessed and Taxable Values
Assessed Value Taxable Value
Largest increase since 1999
Taxable Value Increase
FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Current Budget Recommendation 3% 4% 4%
Previous Budget Estimate* 3% 3% 3%
Increase from Prior Year’s Estimate 0% 1% 1%
*From budget adopted on September 18, 2014
Estimated Percentage Change in County-wide Taxable Value
Millage Reductions
The 3-year budget as adopted last year on September 18, 2014, was based on a tax levy of 4.19 mills for County general operations
A reduction of .10 mills was recently approved for the July 2015 levy
The recommended budget includes an additional .05 mills reduction for the July 2016 levy
The combined total reduction of .15 mills results in a 4.04 millage rate recommended for FY 2016 – FY 2018
TIF Capture
Capture as
Fiscal Year TIF Capture Tax Levy % of Levy
2016 $5.0 $215.9 2.3%
2015 4.4 212.3 2.1%
2014 4.1 209.7 2.0%
2013 4.0 206.3 1.9%
2012 4.0 206.3 1.9%
2011 4.9 212.8 2.3%
2010 6.3 230.8 2.7%
2009 8.0 261.5 3.1%
2008 8.4 271.3 3.1%
2007 8.4 271.2 3.1%
2006 7.6 260.3 2.9%
2005 7.8 246.6 3.2%
2004 7.2 234.6 3.1%
TIF Capture History for General Fund
(in millions)
Note: FY 2015 & FY 2016 TIF capture amounts are
estimated; all other years are actual amounts. FY 2016
gross tax levy is based on recommended budget
amount.
Peak
Peak
The recently approved policy limits total TIF capture to no more than 5% of the annual tax levy, which is approximately $10.8 million based on the current taxable value and millage rate
Net Change in Property Tax Budget
FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Prior year’s property tax revenue estimate, from budget adopted in September 2014 $217.4 $224.1 $231.0
Adjustments:
Increase in taxable value 1.4 3.6 6.0
Reduction in millage rate (.15 mills) (7.8) (8.0) (8.2)
Reduction for TIF captures (0.6) (0.6) (0.6)
Net adjustments ($7.0) ($5.0) ($2.8)
Revised recommended property tax revenue estimate $210.4 $219.1 $228.2
(in millions)
Summary of Property Tax Revenue Changes
Revenue Sharing
State revenue sharing payments to counties were temporarily eliminated with passage of Michigan Public Act 357 in 2004
Revenue sharing was restored to Oakland County beginning with partial year funding in FY 2015 with full restoration to begin in FY 2016
The County’s 3-year budget as adopted in September 2014 included a 1/3 reduction based on State appropriation for revenue sharing in prior years
The State began fully funding County revenue sharing in FY 2015 and the legislature recently approved continuation of full funding for FY 2016
Based on the revenue sharing estimate as published on the State Treasury website for FY 2016, the recommended budget includes an increase of $10.1 million annually over the next three years for revenue sharing
Capital Improvement Program
Building Security Enhancements
Use of Fund Balance
Expenditure Highlights
Capital Improvement Program
The recommended budget includes an increase of $4 million annually for the transfer from the General Fund to the Building Improvement Fund for a total appropriation of $5.5 million annually
An ongoing appropriation of this amount annually would provide sufficient funding for projected standard capital improvement needs of existing facilities over the next 10 years through FY 2025
Building Security Enhancements
A major building security enhancement project, above and beyond the standard building maintenance projects, is also included in the recommended Capital Improvement Program
Project Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019
Estimated Costs 15,042,500$ 4,074,000$ 5,468,500$ 4,615,000$ 885,000$
Funding Sources:
Budgeted Security Reserve Line Item 7,600,000$ 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$
Assigned General Fund Balance - Security Cameras/Consoles 2,042,986 2,042,986 - - -
Assigned General Fund Balance - Homeland Security Enhancements 6,414,514 131,014 3,568,500 2,715,000 -
Return to Fund Balance (1,015,000) - - - (1,015,000)
Total Funding from All Sources 15,042,500$ 4,074,000$ 5,468,500$ 4,615,000$ 885,000$
Funding for Building Security Enhancements
ATTENTION TO FUND BALANCE
A healthy fund balance is an essential ingredient for long-term budget flexibility and sustainability = adequate cash flow
Significant increases in fund balance over the past decade is a result of planned, early budget reductions
Budgeted Use of Fund Balance
2nd quarter forecast
Declining use of fund balance over next 5 years
2 years ago, the adopted budget included $47 million in use of fund balance for FY 2016
Long-term Forecast of General Fund Balance (in thousands)
Improvement from last year’s estimate of $99.4 million for FY 2019
Deferred Compensation Match
Retiree Health Savings Contribution
General Salary Increase
Recruitment & Retention
Employee Compensation
Deferred Compensation 457(b)
Plan Enhancement - Fidelity
Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan available to full-time eligible employees
Effective with the FY 2010 budget, the County eliminated the $300 (maximum) “employer match” resulting in a significant savings
FY 2016 recommended budget includes the reinstatement of the annual $300 County match for employees in the Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2016
Retiree Health Savings plan (RHS):
January 1, 2006, the County eliminated retiree health coverage for new employees
New employees are offered a Retiree Health Savings Plan which can be used for eligible medical expenses upon retirement or separation from County employment
Currently the County contributes $50 bi-weekly to RHS accounts .
FY2016 recommended Budget includes a $25 bi-weekly increase effective with the first pay period of FY2016 $75
General Salary Increases
General salary decreases during tough economic times 2.5% reduction FY 2010 1.5% reduction FY 2011
No general salary increases FY 2012 and 2013 October 2012 - one-time payment of $500
Restoring general salary increases
2% FY 2014 3% FY 2015 Proposed 3% FY 2016
Employee Recruitment and Retention
Recruitment and Retention efforts a top priority for the County
One third of the County’s workforce is expected to turn-over within the next 3 to 5 years
Retirements
Voluntary turnover
Succession Planning
Identifying needs within departments
Develop strategies
Highlighting the benefits of working for Oakland County
Tuition reimbursement
Health care benefits – low employee contribution
Employee Recruitment and Retention
Promote diversity in the workforce
“NEOGOV” - New applicant system
More user friendly
Compatible with mobile devices
Efforts to promote Oakland County as an employer of choice
Social media
HR website re-design
Sourcing candidates
Establishing strong relationships with colleges and universities
In Closing
The recommended budget is balanced through FY 2018
The longer term five-year forecast projects a balanced position through FY 2020
Includes continued but diminishing use of General Fund Balance through FY 2020
Oakland County retains its AAA rating, which would not be possible without the continued support from the Board of Commissioners, the elected officials, and the County’s workforce