o?5::'?- Y - Delhidsssb.delhi.gov.in/sites/default/files/All-PDF/scan0262.pdfii) Allow-ing/Making...

3
Governmentof NeT of Delhi DelhiSubordinate ServicesSelectionBoard Fe-IS, Institutional Area.Karkardooma. Delhi- 110092 Phone: 22370100 htt : dsssb.delhi. ov.in No.F.SS (1SS)/Exaln/DSSSB/2019/ o? 5::'?- Y t Dated: ORDER The following candidates were found usmz unfair means in the examination for the post code 44/13 Foot Constable conducted by Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board. They are debarred from future exams of DSSSB for a peri.od of 1S years w.e.f. 19.06.2019. Name of ~xam:- Written online test for'the Po'st of Foot Constable (44/13) 1 Amit Sh. Sumer Singh Majri-Gubhana, . Rohan DOB ~24.03.1991 JheJjZ!lr,Haryana- chandanl, has Roll NO. 11130300360 124507 appeared in Post code: 44/13 examination 2 Rohan Chandani Sh. Chandra in place of Prakash Amit The Candidates appeanng in vanous examinations being conducted by the DSSSB have repeatedly been warned not to resort to. any unfair xneans/ xnalpractices and further, that: "Any attempt to commit are abet, as the case may be all or any of the acts such as [i] Impersonating, and {ii] Procuring impersonation by any person, may in addition to render himself/ herself liable to criminal prosecution, be liable;" a) To be disqualified by the Board from the examination for which he/ she is a candidate as also from any other examination / selection of the Board in which he / she might have appeared by the final result/ selection has not been declared I made and or b) To be debarred either permanently or for a specified period from any examination held or selection made by them and or, c) To take disciplinary action if he/ she is already in service under Governmen t and or, d) To take any other legal action' Thus, it is clear that the candidate had arranged to have another person taking examinations in place of him. Thus, the candidate and the impersonator have indulged in the following activities amounting to impersonation: 1) Appear1.ngfor examination ror another' candidate 'are arranging to have another person taken an examination for the candidate.

Transcript of o?5::'?- Y - Delhidsssb.delhi.gov.in/sites/default/files/All-PDF/scan0262.pdfii) Allow-ing/Making...

Page 1: o?5::'?- Y - Delhidsssb.delhi.gov.in/sites/default/files/All-PDF/scan0262.pdfii) Allow-ing/Making eornebody else to write answers on candidate's behalf during examination. iii)Helping

GovernmentofNeT of DelhiDelhiSubordinate ServicesSelectionBoard

Fe-IS, Institutional Area.Karkardooma. Delhi- 110092Phone: 22370100 htt : dsssb.delhi. ov.in

No.F.SS (1SS)/Exaln/DSSSB/2019/ o?5::'?- Y t Dated:

ORDER

The following candidates were found usmz unfair means in the

examination for the post code 44/13 Foot Constable conducted by DelhiSubordinate Service Selection Board. They are debarred from future exams of

DSSSB for a peri.od of 1S years w.e.f. 19.06.2019.

Name of ~xam:- Written online test for'the Po'st of Foot Constable (44/13)

1 Amit Sh. Sumer Singh Majri-Gubhana, . RohanDOB ~24.03.1991 JheJjZ!lr,Haryana- chandanl, has

Roll NO. 11130300360 124507 appeared inPost code: 44/13 examination

2 Rohan Chandani Sh. Chandra in place ofPrakash Amit

The Candidates appeanng in vanous examinations being conducted by the

DSSSB have repeatedly been warned not to resort to. any unfair xneans/xnalpractices and further, that:

"Any attempt to commit are abet, as the case may be all or any ofthe acts such as [i] Impersonating, and {ii] Procuring impersonation by any

person, may in addition to render himself/ herself liable to criminal prosecution,

be liable;"

a) To be disqualified by the Board from the examination for

which he / she is a candidate as also from any other

examination / selection of the Board in which he / she mighthave appeared by the final result/ selection has not been

declared I made and or

b) To be debarred either permanently or for a specified period

from any examination held or selection made by them and or,c) To take disciplinary action if he/ she is already in service under

Governmen t and or,d) To take any other legal action'

Thus, it is clear that the candidate had arranged to have another person

taking examinations in place of him. Thus, the candidate and the impersonatorhave indulged in the following activities amounting to impersonation:

1) Appear1.ng for examination ror another' candidate 'are arranging

to have another person taken an examination for the candidate.

Page 2: o?5::'?- Y - Delhidsssb.delhi.gov.in/sites/default/files/All-PDF/scan0262.pdfii) Allow-ing/Making eornebody else to write answers on candidate's behalf during examination. iii)Helping

ii) Allow-ing/Making eornebody else to write answers on candidate'sbehalf during examination.

iii) Helping or 'receiving help from other candidates to impersonate.iv) Signingj getting signed the attendance sheet and othr

examination doo u rrierrt.son somebody else's behalf either partially

or completely.

v) Providing admit card to another person to enable him to appear

on behalf of the candidate.

Further, both candidates have also indulged in the act of FORGERY by

altering the identity proof of candidates, admit cards etc, and produced thesedocuments to the examination conducting functionaries with the intent to

defraud, as the documents produced are materially different from the recordsavailable with the DSSSB.

Therefore, it is evident that the candidate alongwith impers?nator, were

actively involved in the crime related to irrrpersoria.tiori cheating, forgery,

connivance and conspiracy as specified in Indian Peflal Code.

In view of above facts and circumstances, the DSSSB has come to theconclusion that, prima facie, a case of impersonation, cheating, forgery,

connivance and conspiracy is made out against the candidates.Further, attention is drawn to the following provisions of the "General

Instruction" for candidates for the various post Codes in 'online, offline & PET

examination.

In any case of impersonation comes to notice then Overall Incharge

~ Observer shall lodged FIR against both persons i.e. candidateswho applied and the impersonator under relgvant sections. These

persons shall also be debarred from appearing in future exams of

DSSSB and other Board/ Commissions."

The DSSSB adheres to 2~RO TOLmRANCE POLICY TOWARDS ANY

MISCONDUCT by any candidate or any persons. Therefore, in view of the abovefacts and c ir-c crrra e t.e.rr c c e , the candidature of the above candidates w-ho have

" .',.

appeared in the exam'inatlon is hereby ca~cel1ed, on finding them involved in

the acts as mentioned above in the table.Further, the above candidates are hereby debarred from any examination

being conducted by the DSee:e fOr a period or 1:) years w.e.C. 18.06.2019

mentioned again.et thelT1 in the table.

This issues with the prior approval of Corrrpete n t Authority, DSSSB

ONCT Of Delh1.

Page 3: o?5::'?- Y - Delhidsssb.delhi.gov.in/sites/default/files/All-PDF/scan0262.pdfii) Allow-ing/Making eornebody else to write answers on candidate's behalf during examination. iii)Helping

1. Amit S/o Sumer Singh, Majri Gubhana, Jhajjar, Haryana-1245072. Rohan Charidani S/o Sh. Chander Prakash, thourgh official website ofDSSSB.

~ \(.P'Iy~'\l\j~

(Deputy Secretary)