o?5::'?- Y - Delhidsssb.delhi.gov.in/sites/default/files/All-PDF/scan0262.pdfii) Allow-ing/Making...
Transcript of o?5::'?- Y - Delhidsssb.delhi.gov.in/sites/default/files/All-PDF/scan0262.pdfii) Allow-ing/Making...
![Page 1: o?5::'?- Y - Delhidsssb.delhi.gov.in/sites/default/files/All-PDF/scan0262.pdfii) Allow-ing/Making eornebody else to write answers on candidate's behalf during examination. iii)Helping](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052101/603b17bf5ec2ef102219e418/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
GovernmentofNeT of DelhiDelhiSubordinate ServicesSelectionBoard
Fe-IS, Institutional Area.Karkardooma. Delhi- 110092Phone: 22370100 htt : dsssb.delhi. ov.in
No.F.SS (1SS)/Exaln/DSSSB/2019/ o?5::'?- Y t Dated:
ORDER
The following candidates were found usmz unfair means in the
examination for the post code 44/13 Foot Constable conducted by DelhiSubordinate Service Selection Board. They are debarred from future exams of
DSSSB for a peri.od of 1S years w.e.f. 19.06.2019.
Name of ~xam:- Written online test for'the Po'st of Foot Constable (44/13)
1 Amit Sh. Sumer Singh Majri-Gubhana, . RohanDOB ~24.03.1991 JheJjZ!lr,Haryana- chandanl, has
Roll NO. 11130300360 124507 appeared inPost code: 44/13 examination
2 Rohan Chandani Sh. Chandra in place ofPrakash Amit
The Candidates appeanng in vanous examinations being conducted by the
DSSSB have repeatedly been warned not to resort to. any unfair xneans/xnalpractices and further, that:
"Any attempt to commit are abet, as the case may be all or any ofthe acts such as [i] Impersonating, and {ii] Procuring impersonation by any
person, may in addition to render himself/ herself liable to criminal prosecution,
be liable;"
a) To be disqualified by the Board from the examination for
which he / she is a candidate as also from any other
examination / selection of the Board in which he / she mighthave appeared by the final result/ selection has not been
declared I made and or
b) To be debarred either permanently or for a specified period
from any examination held or selection made by them and or,c) To take disciplinary action if he/ she is already in service under
Governmen t and or,d) To take any other legal action'
Thus, it is clear that the candidate had arranged to have another person
taking examinations in place of him. Thus, the candidate and the impersonatorhave indulged in the following activities amounting to impersonation:
1) Appear1.ng for examination ror another' candidate 'are arranging
to have another person taken an examination for the candidate.
![Page 2: o?5::'?- Y - Delhidsssb.delhi.gov.in/sites/default/files/All-PDF/scan0262.pdfii) Allow-ing/Making eornebody else to write answers on candidate's behalf during examination. iii)Helping](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052101/603b17bf5ec2ef102219e418/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
ii) Allow-ing/Making eornebody else to write answers on candidate'sbehalf during examination.
iii) Helping or 'receiving help from other candidates to impersonate.iv) Signingj getting signed the attendance sheet and othr
examination doo u rrierrt.son somebody else's behalf either partially
or completely.
v) Providing admit card to another person to enable him to appear
on behalf of the candidate.
Further, both candidates have also indulged in the act of FORGERY by
altering the identity proof of candidates, admit cards etc, and produced thesedocuments to the examination conducting functionaries with the intent to
defraud, as the documents produced are materially different from the recordsavailable with the DSSSB.
Therefore, it is evident that the candidate alongwith impers?nator, were
actively involved in the crime related to irrrpersoria.tiori cheating, forgery,
connivance and conspiracy as specified in Indian Peflal Code.
In view of above facts and circumstances, the DSSSB has come to theconclusion that, prima facie, a case of impersonation, cheating, forgery,
connivance and conspiracy is made out against the candidates.Further, attention is drawn to the following provisions of the "General
Instruction" for candidates for the various post Codes in 'online, offline & PET
examination.
In any case of impersonation comes to notice then Overall Incharge
~ Observer shall lodged FIR against both persons i.e. candidateswho applied and the impersonator under relgvant sections. These
persons shall also be debarred from appearing in future exams of
DSSSB and other Board/ Commissions."
The DSSSB adheres to 2~RO TOLmRANCE POLICY TOWARDS ANY
MISCONDUCT by any candidate or any persons. Therefore, in view of the abovefacts and c ir-c crrra e t.e.rr c c e , the candidature of the above candidates w-ho have
" .',.
appeared in the exam'inatlon is hereby ca~cel1ed, on finding them involved in
the acts as mentioned above in the table.Further, the above candidates are hereby debarred from any examination
being conducted by the DSee:e fOr a period or 1:) years w.e.C. 18.06.2019
mentioned again.et thelT1 in the table.
This issues with the prior approval of Corrrpete n t Authority, DSSSB
ONCT Of Delh1.
![Page 3: o?5::'?- Y - Delhidsssb.delhi.gov.in/sites/default/files/All-PDF/scan0262.pdfii) Allow-ing/Making eornebody else to write answers on candidate's behalf during examination. iii)Helping](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052101/603b17bf5ec2ef102219e418/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1. Amit S/o Sumer Singh, Majri Gubhana, Jhajjar, Haryana-1245072. Rohan Charidani S/o Sh. Chander Prakash, thourgh official website ofDSSSB.
~ \(.P'Iy~'\l\j~
(Deputy Secretary)