'O · ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, INC. Giineaville, ... Materials Agency Aberdeen...

'O

ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEYL, OF*- WEST VIRGINIA ORDNANCE WORKS

PROJECT REVIEW MEETINGApril 24-2}, 1985

I I

I I

Prepared for:

\*J U.S. ARMY TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AGENCY• Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland

0

Prepared by;

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, INC.Giineaville, Florida

84-604-0705-0120

0'H.lJ)D-WVOW-FR.1/42425AGENDA.1

04/10/85 fi

AGENDAWEST VIRGINIA ORDNANCE WORKS

ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEYPROJECT REVIEW MEETINGApril 24-25, 1985

WednesdayApril 24, 1985

8:30-8:45 I. INTRODUCTION

8!45-9:15 II. SITE BACKGROUND

A, LOCATIONB. HISTORYC. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTINGD. AREAS OF CONCERNE. SURVEY OBJECTIVES

9:15-10:00 III. SAMPLE SITE/AREA LOCATION. RATIONALE. ANDMETHODOLOGY

A. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS

1. Surface Geophysical Surveya. EMb, Resistivityc. GPR

2. Piezometers3. Monitor Hells

a. Well Development Programb, Water-Level Measurementsc. Slug Testsd. Borehole Geophysicse. Sampling

1, Monitor. Wells2. Domestic/Municipal Wells

B. SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT INVESTIGATIONS

1. Surface Hydrologya. Water-Level Determinationsb. Flow Determinations

2. Surface Water and Sediment Samplinga. Surface Watersb, Sedimentsc. Sumps

C. SOIL AND SEWER INVESTIGATIONS n I OQI

1, Soils .. -' - - ' ' '2. Sewers

X-s. D-WVOW-FR.1/42425AGENDA.2' } 04/10/85'>..*•'



(Continued, Page 2 of 5)

10:00-10:15 BREAK

10:15-12iOO IV. HYDROLOGICAL/GEOHYDROLOGICAL ANALYSI5

A. SURFACE HYDROLOGICAL ANALYSIS1. Water-level Patterns2. Flow Regimes

B. GEOKYDROLOGICAL ANALYSIS1. Water-level Patterns2. Hydraulic Gradients3. Aquifer Characteristics4. Ground Water Flow

a. Directionb. Rate

5. Surface Water/Ground Water Interaction6. Water Balance

o12:00-1:00 LUNCH

1:00-2:30 V. CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT

TOT AREA AND DRAINAGE1. Soils2, Surface Waters/Sediments3. Ground Hater4. Migration PotentialBURNING GROUND AREA AND DRAINAGE1. Soils2. Surface Waters/Sediments3. Ground Water4. Migration PotentialACIDS AREA/YELLOW WATER RESERVOIR AND DRAINAGE1. Soils/Sewers2. Surface Haters/Sediments3. Ground Water4. Migration Potential

2:30-2:45 BREAK

AR30I295

D-WVOW-FR.1/42425AGENDA. 304/10/85




2145-5:00 CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT CONTINUED

D. RED WATER RESERVOIRS1. Soils/Red Water Sewerline2. Surface Waters/Sediments"3. Ground Water4. Migration Potential

E. POND 13/WET WELL AREA AND DRAINAGE1. Soils2. Surface Waters/Sediments3. Ground Water4. Migration Potential

F. OTHER1. Domestic/Municipal Well Sampling Results2. Power Houses/Maintenance Areas3, Ordnance Rework Facility

ThursdayApril 25. 1985

8:30-9:30 Tour of Facilities

9:30-10:15 VI. HAZARD/ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT

A. HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OFCONTAMINANTS OBSERVED

B. LAND USEC. WATER USED. EXPOSURE PATHWAYS DISCUSSION

1. Surface Water2. Ground Water3. Biota

E. ACCEPTABLE RISK DISCUSSIONF. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND CRITERIA

1. Ground Water2. Surface Water3. Potable Water4. Soils

10:15-10:30 BREAK AR30I296

ill

o D-WVOW-FR.1/42425ACENDA.404/10/85

O




10:30-12:00 HAZARD/ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT CONTINUED

G. WORKING AND DISCUSSION SESSION1. Methodology for Soil Criteria Evaluation2. Evaluation of Adverse Environmental Effect

of Remediationa. Habitat Valueb, Habitat Devaluation by Remedial

Alternatives

12:00-1:00 LUNCH

1:00-2:30 '.VII. ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY STUDY

A. GOALS/OBJECTIVESB. DISCUSSION OF METHODOLOGY TO CONDUCT WVOW

FEASIBILITY STUDY1. Identify Alternatives

a. Characterize Problem and IdentifyGeneral Response Actions

b. Identify Potential Technologies (by typeof media)

c. Screen Technologiesi) Waste Characteristics (by type of

mediaii) Technology Development (by type of

media)iii) Sice Characteristics (by area of

concern, i.e., TNT area, burningground, Pond 13, Red Water Lagoon,Industrial Sewers)

d. Select Applicable Technologies toDevelop Alternatives (by area ofconcern)

2. Screen Alternatives (by area of concern)a. Technical Screeningb, Environmental, Public Health, and

Institutionalc. Cost Screening (+100X| -5015);d. Determine Applicable Alcernat?v*fis~

iv

ORIGINAL

D-WVOW-FR.1/42425AGENDA.504/10/85




ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY STUDY CONTINUED

3. Conduct Detailed Analysis of Alternatives(by area of concern)a. Technical Analysisb, Institutional Analysisc. Environmental Analysisd. Public Health Analysise. Coat Analysis

4. Summarize Applicable Alternatives inDraft Report

C. STATUS OF WVOW FEASIBILITY STUDY

2:30-2:45 BREAK

2:45- VIII. SUMMARY/DISCUSSION

AR301298- -

.OPTIMAL

CLIFTON F, McCLISTATE WILDLIFE STATION

SCALESOURCES! City ol Point Plimnt<County ol Miion,

Chimbtr ol Commirct, n,d,ESE, 1984,

1 2 KILOMETERS

Figure 1.1-1LOCATION OP THE FORMERWEST VIRGINIA ORDNANCE WORKSSITE Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland

Prepared lor: RR301299U.S. Army Toxic and HazardousMaterials Agency

(Red)

;:. I•YELLOW WATER ,I/*J"'*"' IRESERVOIR ««&«. i

0 1800 3000 FEET SOURCES: USATHAMA, 1984b,^ IJI SJ™ rBBI Wir Dipirtminl, O.C.E,, Conittuetlon Dlvlilon, 1950,500 0 500 1000 METERS ESE.19B4,

Figure 1.1-2SITE MAP OF WEST VIRGINIAORDNANCE WORKS (1942-1945)

Prepared for:U.S. Army Toxic and HazardousMaterials AgencyAberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland

SCALE1800 0 1500 3000 FEET SOURCES: USATHAMA, 19«4b.£5S =35L w" Dipittmint, O.C.E., Conilrucllon Division, 1950,

500 0 500 1000 METERS Wllmolh, 1989,ESE, 1984,

Figure 1.1-4SURFACE HYDROLOGY AT WESTVIRGINIA ORDNANCE WORKS (1942)

Prepared for:U.S. Army Toxic aMaterials AgencyAberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland

POnMM,NORTHWILLCIILO

A ..« «ww «BT SOURCES: USATHAMA, 1984b,0 1800 3000 FEET w,r Dipartmmt, O.C.E., Conilruetlan Division, 1950,mmfm==mmum Slid ol Will Virginia, DNR, 1994.

800 0 800 1000 METERS ESE.1984,

Figure 1.1-5SURFACE HYDROLOGY AT THE FORMERWEST VIRGINIA ORDNANCE WORKSSITE (1975) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland

Prepared for:U.S. Army Toxic anMaterials Agency

(Red),

SCALE1800 0 1500 3000 FEET SOURCES: E, B, Bldgir ind Soni, Co,, 1943,SSmE ^ Sm Stnjilli ind Clnquignnni, 1981,

800 0 500 1000 METERS ESE, 1984,

Figure 1,1-12SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL EXPLOSIVECONTAMINATION AT WEST VIRGINIAORDNANCE WORKS proy|nfl Qf0und| ,afyl.nd

Prepared for:U.S. Army Toxic anMaterials Agency

nnouWEST VIRGINIA" ' '

ORDNANCE WORKSEnvironmental Survey

OBSERVATION WELL LOCATIONS

(Red).'

KEY PADLOCK• HINOED LOCKED CAP

...COT MAXIMUM|———• PROTECTIVE JTEEL CASINO IB-INCH OlAMETERi

.OVERSIZED CAP

.INTERNAL MORTAR COLLAR..COARSE QRAVEL BLANKET

O

ALLUVIUM

4 FEET —— J

PVO CASINO I4.INCH OIAM8TERI

BENTONITE SEAL 1 3 FEETI

PVC WELL SCREEN(VARIABLE, APPROXIMATELY 15 FEET)

SANOIQRAVEI. PACK

NOT TO SCALE

SOURCE: ESE,1984,

Figure 341SHALLOW MONITOR WELLCONSTRUCTION

Prepared for: AK3UNUDUS 0*'0 ™* HazardousMaterials AgencyAberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland

VTM V\ . / ' \V.WEST VIRGINIALOCATIONS OF MONITOR WELLS AT

WEST VIRGINIA ORDNANCE WORKSINCLUDING EPA WELLS Ol, 02,03, AND 04

ORDNANCE WOREnvironmental Su

(Red)/

ASH PIT (NORTH)AND LANDFILL®

FORMERYELLOW WATERRESERVOIR

KEYES3 AREA OF EM SURVEY AND RESISTIVITY SOUNDING•mi RED WATER SEWERLINEI LOCATION OF GPR TRANSECTS

fV 'SCALE'1500 0 1500 3000 FEET•«••==£•• SOURCE: ESE, 1954,

500 0 500 1000 METERS

Figure 2.1-1LOCATIONS OF THE AREASTO BE SURVEYED BYGEOPHYSICAL TECHNIQUES Aberd,,n Provlng Qround, Mary|.nd

Prepared for:U.S. Army Toxic ffR4H<ratf?usMaterials Agenc

--. ,;AL(Red)/

1,500 FEET••800 METERS

LOCATIONS OF SURFACE WATER ANDSEDIMENT SAMPLING STATIONS WEST VIR


o

o

OO'OOC OO'OSZ OC'OOE 00'OS I 00'001 00'OS OC'CP(SJO) 30yVHOSIQu

0ooo-00

o

AR30I

oo

sioo

18ce0<Ol—•CO§ ro

Oz

3 1 1

00'06'S ..OS'68'S 00'68'S OS'88S 00'88S OS'^85 00'^8S(ISW-ld) 13A31 «3iVM

13

°

ooo

-00

AR30I3I?00'619 00'8I9 00'^I9 OC'9I9 00'S19

(1SN-ld) 13A31 d3IVM14

s"

81-

Jioco§ " (Dco ~"

-;NAL(Red) /'

O

0

ol-

«8."t-cc<

o*-oCO

ro

OJ

§1313

15

WEST \AifcaCd 31 IfORDNANCE WORKSEnvironmental Survey

GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION LOCATIONS

THICKNESS OF GRAY CLAY UNIT(FT) WEST VIRGINIA

ORDNANCE WDMtS|3|5

17

«I!ON~TOP OF QRAY CLAYPI MaLf ORDNANCE WflrWS , „ , ftEnvlronm«nl«Blu«»* I 0 I, D

18

n

o8P ?b

go

AR30I300-019 oo'ses oo'oas oo'sas oo-oss oo-scs oo-o

(ISW-id) N01IVA31319

g

8I

8'o,'r.ri-se !^lN iH I

8fi 8'O ftIs8S4fX8**o»«m I

»•*wgoa

8_______________ _____________ too'00*9 oo'SBS oo oTs ooTs's oo'O^R oo' sz's oo-oir '

IlSW-id) NOI1VA313AR30I3I8

'" G10

O

H°"'"t 00'MS!U"Nofrai300''"

K

m

I

>»

9*

. .

00-019 oo'W oo'Oilr oo-m

!

:mW':mIWaaSW1•HHMM

LAflifiru LOCATION OMMT UNM MANOI WllfVjflaiNIA

OfToWAWfllwMHIInvififimififii! lufviyn

\«I1AuMdMJp^Mlf B Jmpmiwvi'tpi'i m n

Lwiii! *«*

b ttnw

i a

I

f *

/•'

I»JK(-n

nifOT?i

yp

/

M\\

T«'1 IM

u

, 4*"

1

(Peril

KO 0 900 1,800 FEET

300 0 100 (00 METERS

WESTVIRORDNANCE WOREnvironmental Survey

CV: '

O

o

(A

O

3o

NO.

zoI-W

31

(Rpo'l

®

TNT LINES 8 THROUGH 12 WEST VIRqllfl/S 0 I 3 3 01DNANCEWORKSORDNANCE'

Environmental Survey

32

o

COUNTY MAINTAINED ROAD

ALL CONCENTRATIONS ARE uglfl DRY WT,

TNT LINE BSOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS

nruuWEST VIRGINIA


33

OR,'

LINE 10

V504 BLDQ.

CONVEYOR LINES 4TJ10*

LINE 9

&* TNT LINE »I10

ALL CONCENTRATIONS AREug/g DRY WEIGHT

NAILING)

II •BARRIER

HOUSE

SCALE0 . 15 30 FEET

•T208ROADWAY

TNT LINE 0

iOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS 806 HOUSE:OUNDATIONS/RUBBLE - TNT LINE 9ND NAILING HOUSE TNT LINE 9/10 Environmental Survey

34

WEST VIRGINIAORDNANCE WORKS

•' WASH OUT

ALL CONCENTRATIONS AREtig/g DRY WEIGHT

SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS ••TNT LINE 10

WEST VIRGINIAORDNANCE WORKSEnvironmental Survey

35

c:,(far1

SCALEMO 0 MO 1,500 FEET

300 0 300 (00 METERS

/f-TSfeP

LOCATION OF "TOXIC" SWAMPAREA

WEST VIRGINIAORDNANCE W|Environmental

I _____36

o

TXA,B,E.0145

TOXIC SWAMP AREASOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS

WEST VIRGINIA ori, oo CORDNANCE wflmtfU 10 03Environmental Survey

37

urumwww

LINE FILLED WITHORGANIC RESIDUES-75-15% NITROAROMATICS

LINES UNDERROADWAY ARECONCRETE CASEDw

TRUNK LINESEWERS 1-ir V.F.

DISCOLOREDCLAY

ALL CONCENTRATIONS AREiig/g DRY WEIGHT

TNT i IMP «SEWER EXCAVATIONSEWER EXCAVATION Environmental Survey

38

WEST VIRQINIAORDNANCE WOR

flD o n i q^JU ! J

o

o

.o AR3

S2I"«iPW0*3tcuj~

'I

I(0NUJ

1.137

39

(Red'MrfirvowMiMf

M'

10.0'

15,0'

<fo. PLOW-SPLITTING A

DEVICE ' ->5£;WET IWELLCOUN1ROAD

————— LAND SURFACE

_ S

/

15'V.P, SANDY CLAYCONCRETE / V

NRfpfiar • TR10A

f — — '4' — *»| *TRIOB iono/w

k POND 13 f

~——*I^RWET*

WELL2•Y i2 r

, 'MANHOLE

X "

RUNNING SAND

V,P. - VITRIFIED PIPE

ALL CONCENTRATIONS ARE ug/g DRY WT,

RED/YELLOW WATER TRUNK SEWER WEST VIRCNORTH OF TNT LINE 10 AT COUNTY ORDNANCE \ROAD 12 Environments

'N D-O n i o o cVORKBOlJlOOtSurvey

40

SURFACE WATER DRAINAGEPATTERNS AND SAMPLINGLOCATIONS IN THE SOUTHERN ENDOF THE TNT AREA

M.30I339WEST VIRGINIAORDNANCE WORKSEnvironmental Survey

O

O

13oi(9

s i(1SW 3AOBV 133d) NOUVA313

o

o

§2O

s<43

25DNT.LT13 DNB'LT

28 DNT413DNB.LT24DNUTTNT-15TNB-4

25DNT-LT13 DNB.LT24 DNMTNT-LTTNB-LT 25DNT-22

13 DNB-3824 DNT-330

28 DNT-LT13DNB-LT24DNUTTNT-LTTNJ.LT/

28 DNT-1413DNB-324DNT-160TNT-11,000"TNB-2,000 . „ _ 280NT-12

J,^ § 13DNB-2240NT.8TNT.130

26DNT-213 DNfl.LT24 DNT-LTTNT-7,3TNB-5

NOTES: LOCATIONS MARKED AS OWARE 1" PIEZOMETERS, ALL OTHERSITES ARE 4" DIAMETER MONITOR

a INDICATES CONCENTRATIONLESS THAN DETECTION LIMITS

ALL CONCENTRATIONS IN ug/lSCALE450 0 450 800 FEET

AROUWEST VIRGINIA


NITROAROMATIC CONCENTRATIONIN GROUND WATER, TNTMANUFACTURING AREA

NOTES: LOCATIONS MARKED AS OWARE 1' PIEZOMETERS, ALL OTHER

GROUND WATER FLOW RATE: SITES *"« 4" DIAMETER MONITOR•w.,'.-.--r— ©K-2,2X10'* FT/SEC WELLS'

*/ ''• n« «0.27-i •-•> dWdl. 2,3X10-"FT/FT WATER LEVEL CONTOURS 1(7/65

V - 0,15 FT/DAYINDIVIDUAL MEASUREMENTS SHOWN

SCALE ®K - 3,6 X 10 -« FT/SEC IN BRACKETS ARE PIEZOMETRIC LEVELS450 0 450 OOP FEET n, • 0,22 DEEP AQUIFER,__________ dh/dl 1.7 X 10 - ' FT/FT150 0 150 300 METERS » " 0,24 FT/DAY

GROUND WATER FLOW RATESHALLOW AQUIFER -TNT MANUFACTURING AREA

.W.?.S.T,VJ«9M30I31»3ORDNANCE WEnvironmental Survey

45

(Rsrii

TNT MANUFACTURING AREA -LOCATIONS OF SPRINGS

I K J U IWEST VIRGINIA


46

BOU • at] an dilution Illltl

All oonttnlMlloni In |U/U,

TNT MANUFACTURING AREA -LOCATIONS OF SPRINGS ORDNANCE WORKS


ORIGIN,',

FIELD

57NOTE:57 » 55 AREOFF MAPor v on nnOFF MAP

ALL CONCENTRATIONS ARE uglg DRY WT.

;i!i•m

SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS IN THEEAST BURNING GROUNDS


0

48

!.' ' ORlGlf.'Al

I————~~i————0

0

IS'

ui

(0

iiII•JOO(9

49

..ried)/

o

8 8 5IISW 3A08V 133d) NOIW313

"",„

o,

i

5 AR3

H

M

ecu*:

50

G

° B-

8 g S 8 S(O (O 10 U) U)

Q

0«

(1SW 3AOSV 133d) NOI1VA313UJ

5-

DC Ul<~>0g

&><!Stel

o

qaO 03

51

3M FEET - 570 - WATER LEVEL CONTOUR 1/7/65 FT/MSL(P) PROBABLE PERCHED AQUIFER

50 100 METERS WELLS WITH SUFFIX S, I, OR D.AB£ jliZVW&ft

GROUND WATER LEVEL CONTOURS1/7/85 BURNING GROUNDS


52

YELLOW WATER NEUTRALIZATIONFACILITY

WEST VIRGINORDNANCEEnvironmental Survey

53

ORIGIN U

VNORTH ACIDS AREA

•OWU JOJBLOQ, 30MLOO.

K t S g j SU 1 \302BLDQ, | ">/ —— •/—— TQ AAEOI Bp.'A»M!'

OW41 li HlAeoi AAt_ f. ————

8{• 303 BLDQ.

HNOiCONCENTRAT (

. —— M ___ _, ._J MCIUTY 1

AAE03^ •'P/WW 1PROCESS «»'[] °W4'r]rfo=n"*T -413

.AAE10

1 GW27•

N

' —— CO.RD12 ——————

'SOUTHACIDS AREA. _,. .... ^302 BLDQ, 306 BLOQ.

DRAI IAQE NH4 OXIDATION HiSO, CONCENTRATIONDITC «-*NT FACILITY

ALL CONCENTRATIONSIN uglg DRY WT.

CM3 TANK CRADLES

&

ACIDS AREA WEST VIRGINI*D 0 n I q c 'SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS ORDNANCE WORKS0 U ' ° 3 «


t

@54

. , •„ i' (Red;

5 3 3 3 |3° 3 S 3 38U313W SU313W

AR30I

EIUJ

EE

I

MM

353

*

.- , GINAl

Murom ton*

NOTT

NEUTRALIZATIONBUILDING

IHFORMER ROADWAY

B« rINLET | 3 7

•""VrB'

0 SCALE iy

ALL CONCENTRATIONS AREvglg DRY WEIGHT

SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND CROSS WEST VIRGINIASECTION PLAN VIEWS IN THE YELLOW ORDNANCE WORKSWATER RESERVOIR Environmental flufl/ejyg j 3 g .

56

ORIGINA1(Red)

if

AF

<iiIi-flC||J~*zf

O

I

isZyjff K

~ J3553JO

57

(Red)

I I I I I

ds-

5>

^a> AR

if!(9 #75

i

0&56,

58

ORlb:,

100 Q 100 800 METERS

SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE ANDSAMPLING LOCATIONS IN THEACIDS AREA

WEST VIRGINIAORDNANCE WOR&$ 3 0 I 3 5Environmental Survey

7

59

* *T————RJ—————'°

°

*

UJ|ol

T i«Hg ,• g5

w

U, gj———————_J———————22-————10

s i i i(1SW 3A09V 133d) NOI1VA313

»R30i;60

''-•'•.,GINA!

All «one«nlnlloni In |ii/LML • Biloi dilution I III i,'CnroMtoirii Inttrfirinet,

NITROAROMATIC CONCENTRATION INGROUND WATER - ACIDS AREA,YELLOW WATER RESERVOIR


1341

SCAT

WATER LEVEL CONTC5ROUNDWATER FLO'ACIDS AREA/YELLOW

- 3111/1)5 - 596 - DATE OF MEASUREMENT, WATER LEVELK - 3,5x10-* FT/SECGRADIENT dh/dl - 1 FT/1,360 FT • 0,0007

uno BEET N- a 23% (ASSUMED)ouuhtti ftnniiunu/ATPn EI cm.OROUNDWATER FLOW RATE u 0,10 FT/DAY•* ENDPOINTS FOR FLOW CALCULATION

100 200 METERS /I R 3 D I 1 f. D

°FLOWURATES WEST VIRGINIALOW WATBR B^BRVOm ORDNANCE WORKS.LOW WATER RESERVOIR Environmental Survey

62

\

ORIGINAL

* —————— - 90 mtlert —BERM EDGE

§i8,

i

• 06 »14 05 •

11 „

12 03

" ^

)'.' ' .MOUND oaV '' } *^ »02

01

^

i 10

09

J

*RED WATER RESERVOIR NUMBER 1SITE LOCATIONS RR01- 15

o n I 0 C 1 'WESTvlwOrNrA'^?'


63

MirvOWMMM

RwnGRAVITY LINE BETWEEN PUMPINQ STATION

AND RED WATER RESERVOIRS

LS

10.0'

• UNO SURFACECLAY SOU

V.P.

CUY EREbnM 0180010""8011

nwo9c a,oooQi2"v.p.W SEDIMENT,

v^ BAND

RW09B «7

ALL CONCENTRATIONS ARE ugjg DRY WT.

BW10OUTFLOW SEWER FROM RED WATER RESERVOIRS

LS

4,0' CLAY RESERVOIR BERMRWR

/ \tff

12.0'

24.0'

RED WATER TRUNK LINE SEWER

• RW10A <J»RW10B

WND t)RW10C<2'

. SEWERLINE REMOVED

ALL CONCENTRATIONS ARE ug/g DRY WT.

SOIL SAMPLING PROFILES ONTHE RED WATER SEWERLINE ORDNANCE WORKS


.T9!t'iMv

LOCATION OF SCHWARTZ PASTUREAND ACIDS AREA

WEST VIRGINIAORDNANEnvironmental Survey

65

-

^

'

8\mX

MH___*— — — D*

D ^-- «HHOUSE >MQ

^

*»SZOI

\' N RED WATER

SZ03 ^ SEWERLINE• ^

SZ04 \y2\« SZOS MH

8Z05*~\O \

FORMER DAI " ^

OW33 ^ . r \

SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS IN WESftVJRBINIM C 1,SCHWARTZ PASTURE ORDNAflcFWORKs' .


66

300 FEET

TO "lOO METERS

CONCENTRATIONS OFNITROAROMATICS IN SEDIMENTCORE SAMPLES FROM PONDS 1AND 2

WESTVIRCMA30'365ORDNANCE WORKSEnvironmental Survey

67

i.:!GINAL

620 n

660H

560 H

540 H

520J

Anooiooo-GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTIONRED WATER RESERVOIRS


68

WEST VOW WflftM


NITROAROMATIC CONCENTRATIONGROUND WATER, RED WATERRESERVOIRS

SCALE K = 2x10«. It/sec GRADIENT dh/dl150 300 FEET ftoWfUVTB © 6W . 0,006

50 0 SO 100 METERS S i'V.'u"(2) 0,4 Illday

WATER LEVEL CONTOUR 1/7/85GROUND WATER FLOW RATES ORDNANCP WORKSRED WATER RESERVOIRS ORDNANCE WORKS


70

O

O

MAIN ENTRANCE

MoCLINTIC WILDLIFE STATIONPOINT PLEASANT, WEST VIRGINIA

KEYCABLE QATEMAIN ROADSFORMER RIGHT-OF-WAY

BO DITICTABU

SOURCES: Roy F. Wtilon, Inc., 196J.ESE, 1985.

CONCENTRATIONS OF WEST VIRGINNITROAROMATICS IN WATER IN THE OPHNAMPF wniPOND 13/WET WELL AREA_____________g!Zr^£^

71

MAIN ENTRANCE

MoCLINTIC WILDLIFE STATIONPOINT PLEASANT, WEST VIRGINIA

KEY000 CABLE GATE

MAIN ROADSFORMER RIGHT'OF-WAY

NO DRKTMU HITKMMMTIC9

SOURCES: Roy F, Wtilon, loo,, 1953.ESE, 1955,

CONCENTRATIONS OFNITROAROMATICS IN SEDIMENTS IN ORDNANCE WORKSHE POND 13/WET WELL AREA

72

WEST VIRGINIA 30 I 371

O

o

a

0,. .„•,'.

f •*,... ll 'y -;; , j .__,

>.'?'x '"' /;'

* V%|r-

";; /r '

G G'

670-

560-

t •u0 530-

§IU

510-

490-

23!EPA 03 Epft 02 MS^— — *22PJWpsufi/.. 2i

E' * "p ' SANDY SILTY CLAY^—-^

rn T°l SANO "'V,U'J,T. .(•:'. CLAY

;>" SAND )^' SILTY CLAY ?<• SAND/SILT/CLAY ^ —t ———— i ——————————

GRAY CLAY

CLAY

SILTY

SAND ANDGRAVEL

0

SAND

TDBEDROCK

HORIZONTAL SCALE0 _____ 100 FEET

J5.R30I3/.IWEST VIRGINIA

GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION - POND 13 ORDNANCE WORKSEnvironmental Survey

73

MAIN ENTRANCE

(1

KEYCABLE GATEMAIN ROADS

•.-•.--. FORMER RIGHT-OF-WAY-569— WATER LEVEL ELEVATION

(II, MSL)*

SCALE• a

10 0 10 ¥0 METERS/ " \ SOURCE: ESE, 1965,

GROUND WATER LEVEL CONTOURS1/7/85 POND 13

WESTVIRGINMH30I372ORDNANCE WORKSEnvironmental Survey

74 .

ORIGINAL,

MAIN ENTRANCE

••,„>

O

McCLINTIC WILDLIFE STATIONPOINT PLEASANT, WEST VIRGINIA

Q

1DLMLMl.MLMl,

CABLE GATEMAIN ROADSFORMER RIQHT.OF-WAY

ML « It low Dilution Llllt,

All couMMritUni I* nil,

10 0 10 20 METERS/ '"""" \ SOURCE! ESE, 1895.

NITROAROMATIC CONCENTRATIONIN GROUND WATER, POND 13WET WELL AREA 1/7/85

WESTORDNANEnvironmental Survey

75

ORIGIN/-'

*

.<*I'.1'

BURNED T1BUILDING I0RFE05ASH LJ

• RFE01•

STORAGE m^BFEOTTRAILER LJ*

STORAQE|STORAGE |

REMELTWORKS

200•RF•RF6,001

M

• RFE03 *fiK«

EXPLOSIVESSTORAGE

V''1 TRAILER

•RFE04

BOILERHOUSE

— FLOW DIRECTION

• f

E02!05

FE09

iULVER

1

DITCH

1 IFE10

PONDED STREAM

ALL CONCENTRATIONS IN utfg DIIY WT.

SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONSTNT REMELT FACILITY

ORDNANCE WORKS "' 'Environmental Survey

76

O

D-WVOW-FR.l/CP-OH.l04/24/85

HUMAN EXPOSURE PATHWAYS TO BEEVALUATED FOR WVOW

o Ingestion of contaminated ground water used aa water supply

o Consumption of fish that have bloaccumulated contaminants fromsurface water and sediments

o Consumption of ducks and geese that have bioaccuoulated contaminantsfrom surface water, aquatic plants, and sediments

o Consumption of deer, rabbit, quail, grouse, or other game animalsand birds that have bioaccumulated contaminants from plants andsurface water

o Consumption of livestock that have been fed crops grown incontaminated soil

HR30I375

77

";- GINAJ" , .1

D-WVOW-PR.1/CP-OR.2

CONTAMINANT MIGRATION PATHWAYS FROM SOILTO HUMANS AT WVOW

AR30I376

78

D-WVOW-PR.l/CP-OB.I_ 04/24/85

<lfff'

METHOD FOR CALCULATION OF ACCEPTABLESOIL CONCENTRATION BASED ONCONSUMPTION OF GAME ANIMALS

On - f ' "" ' °« - goa ' "WP ' K.w « c. ' w.ut - ———BW——— " BW

D, x BWC. = B————————-————a « Kaw « «wp « KP. « «wa

AR30I377,

79

D-WVOW-FR.1/CP-OH.404/14/85

METHOD FOR CALCULATION OF ACCEPTABLE SEDIMENTCONCENTRATION BASED ON CONSUMPTION OF BASS

BCF

CM » (BW/Wf) X (BCF z 0.027/0.076)-! X Dt

BCF = 0.76 log KO« - 0.23

To calculate acceptable C8ed based on C^:

KSW = Cw/Csedwhere: Ksw = (foe x Hoe)"1

C8fld =

AR30I378

80

O

o

D-WVOW-FR.1/CP-OH.504/24/85

-GROUND WATER-

AQUATIC AQUATIC DUCK,•SURFACE WATER—^-SEDIMENT—*-PLANTS —*-GEESE'

AQUATIC FISHORGANISMS-H BOTTOM-FEEDERS)

CATTLE-

POTENTIAL HUMAN EXPOSURE PATHWAYSRELATED TO SOIL CONTAMINATION

AR30I379o ••• • ••-61

KEYJ MIXED FOREST/RANGE LAND/FORESTED WETLANDS

_I AGRICULTUREIB CLIFTON F, McCLINTIC WILDLIFE STATION13 URBAN (COMMERCIAL, TRANSPORTATION, UTILITIES)S3 RESIDENTIAL• WATER, NONFORESTED WETLANDE3 LANDFILL, TRANSITIONAL

SCALE ED LAND USE DATA NOT REPORTED

1ino " 1S°° 3mFEET SOURCES; EPA, Envl>onminlil Monitoring500 0 500 1000 METERS

Figure 1.5-1CURRENT LAND USE AT THE FORMERWEST VIRGINIA ORDNANCE WORKSSITE Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland

82

Prepared for:U.S. Army Toxic and HazardousMaterials Agenc^R3Q 13 80

OR,,: T-.

D-WVOW-FR.l/WT-OH.l—. , 04/24/85Sw'

PRELIMINARY POLLUTANT LIMIT VALUES—SURFACE WATER

Pollutant PPLV (ppb) ________Basis_______

2,4,6-TNT 9 Human health/bass consumption2,4-DNT 2 Human health/bass consumption2,6-DNT 1 Human health/bass consumptionTNB 80 Aquatic toxlcity

DNB 160 Aquatic toxlcity

O

BR30I38I

83

D-WVOW-FR.1/WT-OH.204/24/85*

PRELIMINARY POLLUTANT LIMIT VALUES-SEDIMENTS

Pollutant PPLV (ppb) _______Baals_______

2,4,6-TNT 0.3 Human health/bass consumption

2,4-DNT 0.03 Human health/baas consumption2,8-DNT 0.005 Human health/bass consumptionTNB 6.5 Aquatic toxiclty

DNB 5 Aquatic toxlcity

AR301382

V- .Will. :

D-WVOW-FR.1/WT-OH.304/24/85

PRELIMINARY POLLUTANT LIMIT VALUES—GROUND WATER

Seep/South TNT Area Remainder TNTGround Water Area Ground Water

Pollutant PPLV (ppb) PPLV (ppb)J,4,a-TNT 100 1,820

2,6-DNT 20 ' 320

J.6-DHT 10 180

TNB 880 14,400

DNB 1,780 28,800

O

AR30I383

85

\trted)D-ECSWVOW.2/PM-OH.1

COALS OF WVOW FEASIBILITY STUDY

DEVELOP AND EVALUATE COST-EFFECTIVE REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES TOCONTROL CONTAMINATION AT WVOW.

0 ADDRESS CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN IDENTIFIED IN REMEDIALINVESTIGATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT

o COMPLY WITH NCP AND STATE, LOCAL, AND FEDERAL CRITERIA

AR30l38f

86

o

Per-

D-BCSWVOW.2/PM-OB.304/17/85

IDENTIFY GENERAL RESPONSE

GIVEN;

o 5 AREAS OF CONCERN

0 5 POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED MEDIA (SOILS, SEDIMENTS, GROUND WATER,SURFACE WATER, INDUSTRIAL 8EWERL1NES)

0 NITROAROMATIC CONTAMINATION ONLY

IDENTIFY:

o CLASSES OF RESPONSE ACTION FOR EACH CONTAMINATED MEDIA

AR30I385

87

(Red)

D-BCSWVOW.2/PM-OH.4

IDENTIFY AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGIES

o TECHNOLOGIES ARE IDENTIFIED FOR BACH RESPONSE ACTION

0 OBJECTIVE IS TO ENSURE THAT ALL AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGIES ARE CONSIDERED

0 3JBOURCES OF INFORMATION INCLUDE LITERATURE SEARCH, PAST EXPERIENCEWITH TREATMENT OF NITROAROMATICS, OTHER REMEDIAL ACTION PROJECTS

AR30I386..... ,....,,«

ORIGIN/',)'Hird.

D-ECSWVOW.2/PM-OH.5_ '..' 04/17/85

O

SCREENING OF AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGIES

0 PURPOSE: TO IDENTIFY ALL APPLICABLE TECHNOLOGIES

0 CRITERIA: WASTE CHARACTERISTICS (BY TYPE OF MEDIA)

TECHNOLOGY STATUS (BY TYPE OF MEDIA)

SITE CHARACTERISTICS (BY AREA OF CONCERN)

o AR30I387

89

D-ECSWVOW.2/PM-OH.504/17/afe

DEVELOP ALTERNATIVES

0 SELECT MOST SUITABLE TECHNOLOGIES FROM TECHNOLOGY SCREENING

0 DEVELOP ALTERNATIVES FOR EACH AREA OF CONCERN

0 DEVELOP AT LEAST ONE ALTERNATIVE FOR EACH OF FIVE CATEGORIES

AR301388

90

D-ECSWVC

O

ALTERNATIVE CATEGORIES

CATEGORY 1: ALTERNATIVES THAT SPECIFY OFFSITE STORAGE, DESTRUCTION,TREATMENT, OR DISPOSAL AT RCRA-LICENSED FACILITY

CATEGORY 2: ALTERNATIVES THAT ATTAIN ALL APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT FEDERALPUBLIC HEALTH STANDARDS, GUIDELINES, OR ADVISORIES

CATEGORY 3: ALTERNATIVES THAT EXCEED ALL APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT FEDERALHEALTH STANDARDS, GUIDELINES, OR ADVISORIES

0 CATEGORY 4: ALTERNATIVES THAT MEET CERCLA GOALS OF PREVENTING ORMINIMIZING PRESENT OR FUTURE MIGRATION OF HAZARDOUSSUBSTANCES, BUT MAY NOT ATTAIN APPLICABLE OR RELEVANTSTANDARDS

CATEGORY 5: NO ACTION

•Q AR30I389

91

D-ECSWVOW.2/PM-OB.804/17/85

SCREEN ALTERNATIVES

TECHNICAL

o PERFORMANCE (USEFUL LIFE, EFFECTIVENESS)

0 RELIABILITY (OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE)

0 IMPLEMENTABILITY (EASE OF INSTALLATION, ACCESS, PERMITTABILITY)

0 SAFETY (DURING INSTALLATION/OPERATION; UPON FAILURE)

AR30I390 -' • fl

92

D-ECSWVOW.2/PM-OH.904/17/85

INSTITUTIONAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, ANDPUBLIC HEALTH CONSIDERATIONS

0 INSTITUTIONAL—ABILITY TO COMPLY WITH STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS

0 ENVIRONMENTAL—ODOR, NOISE, AIR/WATER POLLUTION, EFFECTS ON WILDLIFEHABITAT: EFFECT ON CURRENT LAND USE

OO PUBLIC HEALTH—LONG- AND SHORT-TERM EXPOSURE RISK (HUMAN ANDWILDLIFE)

o flR30!39|

93

D-ECSWVOW.2/PM-OB.1004/17/85

COST SCREENING

0 PERFORMED ON ALL ALTERNATIVES THAT REMAIN AFTER TECHNICAL ANDENVIRONMENTAL/INSTITUTIONAL/PUBLIC HEALTH SCREENING

0 CONSISTS OF CAPITAL COSTS AND OPERATION/MAINTENANCE COSTS

0 BASED ON READILY AVAILABLE, PUBLISHED COST INFORMATION

o SCREENS ALTERNATIVES WITH COSTS THAT FAR EXCEED COSTS OF OTHERALTERNATIVES, BUT WHICH DO NOT PROVIDE GREATER ENVIRONMENTAL ORPUBLIC HEALTH BENEFITS OR RELIABILITY

AR30I392

ORIGIN/'-' ;<:'*' • " ' :' '

D-ECSWVOW.2/PM-OH.1104/17/85

DETAILED ANALYSIS OFALTERNATIVES PASSING SCREENING

o TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

0 INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

0 PUBLIC HEALTH

o ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTSOo COST ANALYSIS

0 SAFETY

Q AR30I393

95

. (Red) : -D-ECSWVOW.2/PM-OB.12

04/17/85

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

o PERFORMANCE (EFFECTIVENESS, USEFUL LIFE)

0 RELIABILITY (OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS, DEMONSTRATEDPERFORMANCE)

0 IMPLEMENTABILITY (CONSTRUCTABILITY, TIME TO IMPLEMENT, PUBLIC» ACCEPTANCE, PERMITTAB1LITY, TIME TO ACHIEVE BENEFICIAL RESULTS)

0 ADVANTAGES/DISADVANTAGES

0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDS

AR30I391»

96

O

ORIGIN1-'D-ECSWVOW. 2/PM-OH-13

04/17/85

INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

o EVALUATE ABILITY OF EACH ALTERNATIVE TO ATTAIN ALL APPLICABLEFEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH STANDARDS,REGULATIONS, GUIDELINES, ADVISORIES, AND USATHAMA GOALS

IDENTIFY NEED FOR COORDINATION BETWEEN AGENCIES: DEVELOP MECHANISM TOCOORDINATE

0 ACCORDING TO.NCP, PRIMARY CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THOSE>«*. ALTERNATIVES THAT ATTAIN APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND GOALS

AR30I395

97

(Reel)D-BCSWVOW.2/PM-OH-14

04/17/85

PUBLIC HEALTH EVALUATION

o SUMMARIZE CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS AND THEIR CONCENTRATIONS IN THEENVIRONMENT FOR EACH ALTERNATIVE

o CHARACTERIZE POPULATIONS POTENTIALLY AT RISK AND IDENTIFY PATHWAYSTHAT MAY LEAD TO EXPOSURE

0 DOCUMENT THAT ALTERNATIVE MINIMIZES LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF RESIDUALCONTAMINATION AND PROTECTS PUBLIC HEALTH DURING AND AFTERIMPLEMENTATION OF ALTERNATIVE

AR30I396 .'*&(itfi

98

D-ECSWVOW.2/PM-OH.15.~ 04/17/85••i Lf

O

ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS AND EFFECTIVENESS

o DETERMINE EFFECTS OF EACH REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVE ON CONTAMINATION

o DETERMINE WHICH ALTERNATIVES WILL ACHIEVE PROTECTION/IMPROVEMENT OFTHE ENVIRONMENT

0 IDENTIFY ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

0 EVALUATE METHODS FOR MITIGATING ADVERSE IMPACTS

HR30I391.

o99

(fit*.D-ECSWVOW.2/PM-OH.18

04/19/85

SAFETY

o PRIMARY HAZARD IS EXPLOSIVE MATERIAL

o IDENTIFY ANY UNSAFE CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH EACH ALTERNATIVE

0 IDENTIFY REQUIREMENTS TO MITIGATE UNSAFE CONDITIONS FOR BACHALTERNATIVE

o ADDRESS SAFETY DURING IMPLEMENTATION (OR UPON FAILURE) OF BACHALTERNATIVE

AR30I398

100

ORIGIN/',!'"'rl'

D-ECSWVOW.2/PM-OH.18y- 04/17/85

DETAILED COST ANALYSIS

0 CAPITAL COSTS

0 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS

o PRESENT-WORTH ANALYSIS

O

AR30I399

101

ORIGIN/I'D-BCWSVOW.2/PM-OH.17

04/17/85$

CHARACTERIZE PROBLEM

0 INPUTS FROM REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION DEFINE THE PROBLEM AND SETOBJECTIVES

—CONTAMINATED MEDIA: GROUND WATER, SURFACE WATER, SOILS, SEDIMENTS

— SPECIFIC CONTAMINANTS AND LEVEL OF CONTAMINATION '

—EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION (AREAL AND VERTICAL)

—QUANTITY AND LOCATION OF CONTAMINATED MEDIA

—BYDROGEOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION

—PATHWAYS OF MIGRATION

—WATER BALANCE

0 ENDANGERMENT/RISK ASSESSMENT

ANALYSIS OF NO-ACTION ALTERNATIVE

CLEANUP CRITERIA (GOALS AND OBJECTIVES)

AR30UOO

102

.iRed)/D-WVOW-FR.l/JRN-OH.l

04/25/85

O

EVALUATION OF ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF REMEDIATION

o Habitat Valueo Habitat Devaluation by Remedial Alternatives

O

,Q AR30|t»OI

103

ORIGIN

MAININIHANCI

S=S«OAO• HCNIC AMA:::: SIKVICI IOADi CAMriNO AIIA

CLIFTON F. MeCLINTIC WILDLIFE STATION

It IPt. Plojunt, WV 25550 wAUifowi UFUSIPh. 675-4380

D-WVOW-FR.1/JRN-OH.204/25/85

O CLIFTON F. McCLINTIC WILDLIFE STATION—SITE CHARACTERISTICS

o 2,800-acre state public hunting and fishing areao Management objective: to provide a quality farm game area and

migratory game bird areao Primary fish and wildlife habitats:

Woodlands (40 percent)Brush lands (32 percent)Agricultural lands (18 percent)Ponds and streams (5 percent)

O

AR30Ht03o ' '"105


o Fish and wildlife resources:Farm game species:Cottontail rabbits*Bobwhlte quail*

Migratory game birds:Mourning dove,*Woodcock,Wood duck*, andCanada geese*

Forest game species:Deer,Ruffed grouse,Grey and fox squirrels

Furbearen:Racoon and muskrat

Varmints:Groundhog and crow

Fish:Largemouth bass,Bluegill, andChannel catfish

AR30|l»OV

106

O\(Red;


o Uniqueness—High annual and Increasing recreational use—Proximity to five metropolitan areas—Significant atate area for waterfowl and upland game bird breeding•nd feeding

—Contains DNR high-quality stream (Oldtown Creek)o Long-term development plans—Continued use as public hunting and

fishing area with management for increasing fish and wildlifeproduction and recreational use

O

O AR30U05

107

HIlin-

.(Red)

AR30U06

108

ORIGIISVA!

D-ECHSVOW.2/PM-OH.1704/17/85

CHARACTERIZE PROBLEM

o INPUTS FROM REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION DEFINE THE PROBLEM AND SETOBJECTIVES

—CONTAMINATED MEDIA: GROUND WATER, SURFACE WATER, SOILS, SEDIMENTS

—SPECIFIC CONTAMINANTS AND LEVEL OF CONTAMINATION

—EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION (AREAL AND VERTICAL)

—QUANTITY AND LOCATION OF CONTAMINATED MEDIA

Nw' —BYDROGEOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION

—PATHWAYS OF MIGRATION

—WATER BALANCE

o ENDANGERMENT/RISK ASSESSMENT

ANALYSIS OF NO-ACTION ALTERNATIVE

CLEANUP CRITERIA (GOALS AND OBJECTIVES)

AR30U07• o • • •102

.(Red)/D-WVOW-FR.l/JRN-OH.l

04/25/85

EVALUATION OF ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF REMEDIATION

o Habitat Valueo Habitat Devaluation by Remedial Alternatives

103

AR30U08W. '

o

o

ORIGIN:•T.. !

MAININIHAHCI

= «OAO• PICNIC AHAi;=::ll«VICI IOADi CAMPING AHA

cm IKCLIFTON F. McCLIHTIC WILDLIFE STATION L S~'pONDU" ""' *"*

O X ^ S J A f l T Y ZONIRt.l Bo»125 •NNsiuRniMaPt. PKiiint, WV 25550 CjwMMKJWi uruaiPh. 675-4380


CLIFTON P. McCLINTIC WILDLIFE STATION—SITE CHARACTERISTICS

o 2,800-acre state public hunting and fishing areao Management objective: to provide a quality farm game area and

migratory game bird areao. Primary fish and wildlife habitats:

Woodlands (40 percent)Brush lands (32 percent)Agricultural lands (18 percent)Ponds and streams (5 percent)

AR30IMO• •

105

o• f/ A '


O

o Fish and wildlife resources:Farm game species:Cottontail rabbits*Bobwhite quail*

Migratory game birds:Mourning dove,*Woodcock,Wood duck*, andCanada geese*

* Forest game species:Deer,Ruffed grouse',Grey and fox squirrels

Furbearers:Racoon and muskrat

Varmints:Groundhog and crow

Fish:Largemouth bass,Bluegill, andChannel catfish

-•O'AR30IM1

106

\(Red;D-WVOW-FR.1/JRN-OH.4

04/25/85 ,

o Uniqueness—High annual and Increasing recreational use—Proximity to five metropolitan areas—Significant state area for waterfowl and upland game bird breedingand feeding

—Contains DNR high-quality stream (Oldtown Creek)o Long-term development plans—Continued use as public hunting and

fishing area with management for increasing fish and wildlifeproduction and recreational use

AR30W2'm

107

.(Red)O

ill

IKO

AR30IU3

108

'O · ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, INC. Giineaville, ... Materials Agency Aberdeen...

Documents

Transcript of 'O · ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, INC. Giineaville, ... Materials Agency Aberdeen...