Alternative Approaches to the Validation of Nondestructive Testin
O I Samples ~j · Diane K. Nichols Labcratoiy Manager Am«ncan Council o ' Inaependen t Laboralones...
Transcript of O I Samples ~j · Diane K. Nichols Labcratoiy Manager Am«ncan Council o ' Inaependen t Laboralones...
': YPJUUHlTTAt.
Texas Water Coimi«5 ionP . 0 . " o - . : 3 0 3 7 , Cap i t o l S t a t i o n CO N. Congr j j s j t AvesuS
T c ?0iDat« :Sub j e c t
Gent l emen , we arc :! ' Fnrvf l rd ing Return ing 2J.Herevith Qunder Separa t e Cove :
the f o l l ow i n g :
[ I Sample s ~ j _ _
j ' -op ie s
r ~r vou: informat ion , andr . ;r vour approval and c o r r e c t ion
For coord i na t i on purposes
XJ for vour : i . e s• 91
jAs per your reque s t
JP l e a s e g ive th is ma t t e rvour immediate attent ion
O
If enc l o sure s are not received as l i s ted above, please not ify us a' once .
cop ies toTelephone: ( 5 1 2 ) A63-
Texas Water CommissionFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO .F i l e s DATE; 0 4 / 2 6 / 9 0THRU : Ernest W. Heyer, Chief, Program Services UnitField Operations DivisionFROM Thomas W. Weber, Inspector, D-5SUBJECT; Sampling Inspection, Koppers Company, Inc. , Superfund Site,Texarkana, TX, No Registration Number
Summary of InvestigationThe referenced inspection was performed by Thomas Weber of District5 on March a, 1990 . After making an inspection at the Kerr-McGeeChemical Corp. facility in Texarkana, I decided to determineupstream conditions on Wagner Creek which flows adjacent to theKoppers sito and then downstream past the Kerr-McGee facility.Upon approach via North Street, the road was closed dje tc recentheavy ra infa l l (see photo 4). Then, I went on foot along North andJameson Streets along the south end of the Koppers site where Inoted that nearly the entire Koppers site lay underwater. WagnerCreek was out of its banks to a stage only several inches lowerthan the rai lroad bridge across Wagner Creek (the bridge crossesthe stream immediately north of Jameson Street) . Photo 2i l lustrates that stonnwater was flowing f ro^ the Superfund siteinto the watershed, and tnat the stage of water was as high as tl:etop cf the west fenceline. An intermittent oil sheen was note-3 irthe iflcw cent roid of Wagner Creek along with a scum associated withlogs, wood cri ips, leaves, and other debris.I tncn drovo around to the West Third Street area in CarversTerrace to view the site from that area. West Third St. wasflooded and \ approached a home where I hoped I could gain accesstc the Kcpp&is site over a fence into tne facility. However, floodwaters did (,ot allow my access by foot. Many backyards on thesouth side of west Third Street were flooded and it appeared thatthe stormwai pr was commingled with stormwater on the adjacentKoppers sit* (photos 5 and 6) . Photo 7 also shows a surface oilsheen that Wns floating in the backyard of the Field residence.Th:s oil was* Of great concern to a woman who lived immediately eastof Fields. she had a camera crew from Channel 6 in Texarkanafilming her complaints.I sampled th9 water and oil sheen, attempting to collect as ir.uchof the oil i'hase as possible. A GC/MS serai-volatile and volatileorganic and}ysis revealed that the priority pollutants were balowdetection i lmita (see attached CCT # SW0 1039 ) .
OvO
o
Koppers Company, IncApril 26, 1990Pace 2
Summary of Citizen Concerns.During the inspection and later voiced to me from David Hall, ofthe City of Texarkana, were citizen concerns related to the Kopperssite. I promised Hall that I would pass these concerns on to theSuperfund Remedial Investigation Unit:
1. Mr. Hall stated that the flooding which I noted on 3/8/90was the third such event in the past 12 months.2. On 3/9/90, Hall informed me that the water had receded
from West Third St. but that oily residues were noted inseveral areas on the ground and streets of theneighborhood.
3. Two citizens in Carvers Terrace indicated that they wereworried about any adverse health effects from thestonnwater that came into their yards. One woman' scomment was "we have been aware of the dangerunderground, now we have to worry about the dangeraboveground,"
4. It has been alleged that natural gas pipes in theneighborhood have corroded and leaked due to creosote inthe ground.
5. On 3/30/90, Mr. Hall informed me that an Arkla Gas crewexcavated an area 1/2 block south of the RR tracks onMilara St. at a curb next to a driveway. In a 2 X l ft.by 11 inch deep pit, he stated that black oily soil witha creosote odor wat1. found. Apparently, anotherexcavation was planned by the gas crew for 4/5/90 onTravis St. in Carvers Terrace.
6. On 4/ 18/90 , Mr. Hall informed me that in the Milam/TravisStreet area, seepage wai> reported occurring from soggyground. The seepage apparently is black and oily, Asample is being analyzed by the City of Texarkana forcreosote constituents at. this time.
In contacts with these citizens, I have stressed r.hat they shouldcontact the Supcrfund staff of TWC or Region e USEPA with theirconcerns, so that their concerns can be evaluated in relation tothe scope of work planned for the site.District 5 hereby refers this information to the Central Office forappropriate action.
L y, 'Thomas W. Websr, InspectorTWW/clmcc: See attached
John W. Witherspoon, Manager
cc Mr. J. E. Fields, 2 0 2 7 W. 3rd St . , Texarkana, TX 75502Mr. David Hall, Office of Emerg. Mgmt., City of Texarkana, 100N. Stateline Ave, , Texarkana, TX 75501Joe Brown, Remedial Investigation Unit, Superfund & EmergencyResponse Section
00OvO
.I/*"
A,
' *. i««^*-
oor~O
TEXAS WATER COMMISSIONDistr ict Nc : ~
./ ---f
r^R."! I '' i
/
s/ feffct'ti • j/
TEXAS wArea COMMISSIONDistrict No r~
o
"Joing
TX
TEXAS WATER COMMISSIONDistrict No -—— -•"-
NO. SWSite N^ne 01039 Point of Co.iec.ion-
./"1=\3»*$ix
T/|ie li«:(ti(y f I (>M"'t. f I Ifl 'vh. M 1iH(M«n«liWf»l; I ! l.mddtf-__ LI www i i c ; fJ L™^™; G o<h« _..__-.-. T,meco..«,,<*coc ft
QDGH: U Yci; H No; Orient*;
SW. Rejiiltatton
LL
TEXAS WATER COMMISSION iwc ouia (P .CV ns 2.1 BCJNO. SW A "t r\ O O") (—u _L LJ O y "<"' '"* /" c"I->ist,"(CA_r^__. ____ Otg. Mo t.^-: /;^-SMaterial Santplcct: L] Solid wnjio (W); [/I r"i.tlli
D Siteain (S); t1 Oi lwv (O)Commenls _________ ___ . _ ___ ._,
( l .J . U Soil ( EJ ; tj Wed (Ml;cinptt:
ivat.on; O None; fe"fce; CJ K,SO4 ; G UNO,
Auxiliary T >;<yr j-J— L/ft-fe^fe
-___'Eg!i-'!!lh.'e<'onh3Ck! LEACMATE: G EP To^icity Soriei. U TWC
35 Parameter Vaf«e
ZErrrnin- »-——'~-T~-LI
LEDinin:
Code ^ia P9fanictcc Value
IXniLniEIZILLExiiaiLniniLn:jiccrrnTx"rrn"XLiiiiLniirniLi:
G3 Parameter Vaiite 7t
:LTm
0 1 4 6 1 2
INTERNATIONALTrCKNOLOGYCORPORATION.
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TEXAS WATER COMMISSION1700 NORTH CONGRESS AVENUEAUSTIN TX 787 1 1 -3087JOHN DUPONT
Date : 03/23/90
Work Order: B O - 0 3 - 1 3 6This is the Certif icate of Analysis for the following samples
Client Vork ID: SU01039Date Received: 03/13/90Number of Samples ; 1Sample Type: VATFR
-e—O
IntroductionSamples vere labeled as follows:
SAKPLESW01039
LABORATORY *B O - 0 3 - 1 3 6 - 0 1
II. QA/QCThe results presented in this report meet the statement ofwork requirements in accordance vith Qu-alicy Control andQuality Assurance protocol.III. Analytical DataThe folloving page(s ) supply results for requested analysesperformed on the samples l isted above.
Reviewed and Approved:
Diane K. NicholsLabcratoiy Manager
Am«ncan Council o' Inaependent LaboralonesInternational Association oi Environmental Testing Laboralones
Arr.«nccn Association lor LaJDcraio.y Aeaediiation
IT Ancxlytical Se.Tices • 5307 Industrial Oafcs Boulevard. Suite 160, Austin, TX 78735 - (* ir, 892-6684
Page: 2
Company: TEXAS VA7ER COMMISSIONDate : 03/28/90Client, Vork ID: SV01039
IT ANALYTICAL SH2VICESAUSTIN, TX(512)892-6684Vork Orde r ; B O - 0 3 - 1 3 6
TEST NAME: HAZ. .RDOUS SUBSTANCE VOLS
SAMPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE: 03/OE/90ANALYSIS DATe,: 03/21/90
Results in
Detect ionLimit
Methyl chloride ND 10Methyl bromide ND 5.0Vinyl chloride KD 10Chloroethane KD 10Methylene chloride 17 * 5.0Acetone KD 100Carbon disulfide KD 5.01,1-Dichloroethylene KD 5 .01,1-Dichloroethane KD 5.0trans-l ,2~Dichloroethylen^ KD 5 .0Chloroform KD 5 .01 , 2-Dich loroethane KD 5.02-Butanone KD 1001 , 1 , 1 -Tr i ch loroethane KD 5.0Carbon tctrachlorice KD 5.0Vinyl acetate KD 50Dlchlorobromomethane KD 5.0
ug/L:
1 ,2-Dich loropropanetrans-l ,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroethyleneChlorodibromomethane1 , 1 ,2-Tr ich loroethaneBenzenecis -1, 3 -Dichloroproper.e2-Chloroethyl'.*inyl etherBromofonn2 -Hexanone4-Methyl-2-pentanoneTetrachloroethylene1 , 1 ,2 ,2-Te t r a c h l o ro e t han eTolueneChlorobenzeneEthylber.zeneStyreneXylenes, total
Detect ion «Limit
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDN'DNDNDN'DNDNDND
5TC
5 . 05 . 05 . 05 . 05 . 010
5 . 05050
5 . 05 . 05 . 05 . 0
.
Surrogates % RecoveryToluene-08 100Bromofluorobenzene 981,2-Dichloroe thane - DA 100
Comments: ' KD ' cr '<' indicates that the compound is not detected a~ the specif ied limit
Pag* : 3
Company: TEXAS VAtER COMMISSIONDate : 03/2S/90Client: Work ID: SV01Q39
IT ANALYTICAL SERVICESAUSTIN, TX(512)892-6684Work Order: BO-03- 136
TEXAS' VA7KR COMMISSION______
* Poss ib le laboratory contamination found at same approximate level inlaboratory blank.
in
o
Company; TEXAS UATER COKHISSIONDate : 03/28/90Client Work ID: SU01039
XT ANALTnCALSEKVlCESAUSTIN. TX(512)892-6664Vork Order: BO -03 - 136
IV. Ket.hodologyReque s t e d analysf i s vere performed according to the foliovincmethods . *
TEST I'^nt HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE VOLS TEST CODE 8240
Hazardou* Substance EPA 8240-Te s t Methods for Evaluating Solid Ua stes~*st Volati le* 3rd Edition, November 1 986 . GC/MS Purge and Trapanalysis
O
TEXAS VATE& COMMISSION04/12/90fork IB: ^SMBKft* *
TEST NAM£: ABN HSL GC/KS EXTRACTABLESSAMPLE ID; SVOX039SAMPLE DATE: 03/08/90EXTRACTION DATE: 03/21/90ANALYSIS DATE: 04/02/90
IT ANALYTICAL SERVICESAUSTIN. *>,X(512)892-6684
TWC UST SECTION '
Phenolbis(2-Chloroethyl)ether2-Chlorophenol1,3-DichlorobenzeneI, 4-Dichlo irobenzeneBenzyl alcohol1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene2-Methylpher.olbis(2-Chloroisopropyl)et:her4-MethylphenolN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamineHexachloroethaneNitrobenzeneIsophorone2-NitrophencI2,4-Dimethy lpheno lSenzoic Acidbis(2*Chloroethoxy)niethane2,4-Dich loropheno l1 ,2,4-Trich lorQ; jffnzenfeNaphthalene^-ChloroanilineKexachlorobuf.adicne1-Chloro-3-mechylphenol2-MechylnaphthaleneHexachlorocyclopcntadiene2,4.6-Tr i ch lo ropheno l2,4,5-Tr i ch l o ropheno l2-Chloronaphthalene2-Nitroant l ineDimechylphth&lateAcenaphthylene
ResultsDetection
NDKDNDKDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
Limit101010101020101010101010101010105010101C10201020101010101C501010
in ug/L: vD
2,6-Dinitrocoluene3-NitroanilineAcenaphthene2,4-Dinitrophenol4-NitrophcnolDibenzofuran2,4-DinitrotolueneDiethylphthalate4-Chlcrophenyl-phenyletherFluorene4-Nitroaniliiie4,6-Din i tro-2-methylphenolN-Nitrosodiphenylaniirie4 -Bromop'.ienyl-pheny lecherKexachlcrobenzenePent^chlorophenolPhenanchreneAnthraceneDi-n-buty:.phthalateFluoranthenePyrer.eButylbensyiphthalate3,3'-Dich lorcbenz id ineBenzo(a)anthraceneChrysenebis(2-iDhylhexyl)pht:halateDi-n-octylphthalatcEenzo(b}fluoranthendBenzo(k)fluorantheneB6nzo(a)pyreneIndent) ( 1 , 2 , 3-cd)pyrent jDibenzo(a,h)anthraceneB*nzo(g,h, i )perylene
Detection^Limit
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
~s
iE5§10505010101010105050101010501010101010102010101010101010101010