O-Bahn City Access Project East Terrace & Rundle Street ... · This report details a proposal for...

Development Assessment Commission21 January 2016

1

O-Bahn City Access ProjectEast Terrace & Rundle Street

Road Closure & Opening Process

DAC Meeting to consider objections and applications for easement

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

AGENDA ITEM 3.3

PAGE NOAGENDA REPORT 2-11ATTACHMENTS

1: ENGINEERED ROAD PLAN & PHOTO OVERLAYS 12-152: PUBLIC NOTICE OF PROPOSED ROAD PROCESSES 16-193: OBJECTIONS / APPLICATIONS FOR EASEMENTS 20-534:SUMMARY OBJECTIONS / APPLICATIONS FOR EASEMENTS 54-57


2

1. PURPOSE OF REPORT

This report details a proposal for the opening and closing of portions of EastTerrace and Rundle Road under the Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991 (theAct), in association with the O-Bahn City Access Project. The report outlines thenature of the objections or applications for easements received during theconsultation period. The report then recommends the making of a Road ProcessOrder in respect to the proposal.

2. BACKGROUND

The O-Bahn Guided Busway commenced operation in March 1986 to Paradise andin August 1989 to Tea Tree Plaza, servicing the north-eastern suburbs of Adelaide.The track currently extends 12 km and includes three interchanges, and carriesapproximately 31,000 people each weekday.

On 25 February 2015, the Premier and Minister for Transport and Infrastructureannounced the final design of the $160m O-Bahn City Access Project. Thisfollowed a period of public consultation and feedback which had further refinedthe design of the project (i.e. tunnel length, retention of Rundle Road,configuration of East Terrace and a shared cycling and walking path on HackneyRoad (Botanic Gardens side).

The key objective of the project is to improve travel times, and increase thereliability and on-time running of bus services for O-Bahn users by directing busesinto Grenfell Street, as well as improving traffic outcomes on the city ring routefor other road users.

On 7 August 2015, correspondence was sent from DPTI to the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Adelaide City Council on the required processes under the Act. Thisletter requested Council’s assistance in undertaking various processes that willfacilitate the changes in land tenure that will be required for the proposal. Apresentation was then made to the CEO on 25 August 2015.

The Strategy, Planning and Partnerships Committee (SPPC) of Council consideredthe commencement of the road process on 1 September 2015. A resolution wasthen passed by full Council on 7 September 2015 to commence this process andundertake the necessary public consultation.

Following the consultation process, the matter was reconsidered by the SPCC on 8December 2015, with Council resolving on 15 December 2015 to forward allsubmissions to the Development Assessment Commission (the 'Commission') todetermine the road process order.

Pursuant to section 3 of the Act, the Commission becomes the relevant authorityto conduct road opening and closure processes that are associated withdevelopments for which it is the planning authority under the Development Act1993.

On 7 October 2015, the Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructurelodged development applications for the O-Bahn City Access Project with theCommission. The applications related to those project works that required consentand/or approval under the Development Act.

AGENDA ITEM 3.3


3

Current configuration – East Terrace Proposed Configuration – East Terrace

Proposed Road Closure – Rundle Street(to accommodate tunnel underneath existing roadway)

AGENDA ITEM 3.3


4

Above: Cnr Pirie Street and Bartels Road – East Terrace Roadwayto be re-aligned north of this intersection.

Below: Section of East Terrace to be re-aligned further westwards

AGENDA ITEM 3.3


5

Above: Existing fountain to be relocated – two regulated treesalso require removal (to be assessed under 020/L073/15)

Below: New intersection and East terrace roadway to connect withGrenfell Street (adjacent to the Tandanya National Aboriginal Cultural Institute).

AGENDA ITEM 3.3


6

For the Park Lands component (DA 020/L073/15 – portal, guided busway, treedamaging activities, car park extension, pedestrian bridge etc) the Commission isthe relevant planning authority, and for the Hackney Road / Dequetteville Terracecomponent (155/V009/15 – portal, guided busway etc) the Minister for Planning isthe relevant authority.

These development applications are currently under assessment.

A further development application (DA 155/V008/15) for tree damaging activitieswithin the Hackney Road road reserve has also been lodged and approved.

The proposed development involves the creation of a dedicated O-Bahn buswayand tunnel through Rymill and Rundle Parks between Grenfell Street and HackneyRoad. Modifications to the existing East Terrace, Grenfell Street and Rundle Roadroad reserves will be required.

The realignment of East Terrace will enable the entry and exit points for theguided busway to be safely and efficiently positioned, whilst maintaining theexisting number of trafficable lanes and associated points of access and egressalong East Terrace.

A separate portion of Rundle Road will also be closed, in this instance to designatethe underground section of the guided busway as it crosses from north to south.The portions of Rundle Road above and below the tunnel will remain public road(Rundle Road), owned by Council.

3. PROPOSAL: ROAD OPENING AND CLOSURE - EAST TERRACE & RUNDLE ROAD

The road process seeks to achieve the following outcomes:

o open a portion of land (delineated and numbered '1' on Preliminary PlanNo. 15/0026) within Allotment 10 in Deposited Plan 74256 betweenGrenfell Street and Pirie Street; and

o then close and vest in the Crown, a portion of East Terrace betweenGrenfell Street and Pirie Street and a portion of Rundle Road (belowground level) situated between East Terrace and Dequetteville Terrace (asdelineated and lettered ‘A’ and ‘B’ respectively on Preliminary Plan No.15/0026).

o The engineered road plan is contained in ATTACHMENT 1.

The proposed alterations to the existing public road network are directlyassociated with the O-Bahn City Access Project. Both East Terrace and RundleRoad will remain open to traffic, with the alignment of East Terrace movingfurther westwards, and a portion of land underneath Rundle Road toaccommodate the guided busway tunnel between Grenfell Street and HackneyRoad. This change is to ensure all sections of the busway are under the care andcontrol of the Minister for Transport.

AGENDA ITEM 3.3


7

4. PUBLIC CONSULTATION

The Adelaide City Council undertook the initial steps of the Roads (Opening andClosing) process. This included the following steps:

Preparation of a Preliminary Plan [15/2006], and Schedule of Affected Owners, Occupiers and Encumbrances

Pursuant to section 10 of the Act, the Council undertook the necessary notificationprocesses as required by the regulations - this included a notice in the SouthAustralian Government Gazette on 17 September 2015, and in the Advertisernewspaper on the same day. Notices were also placed in the Messenger Press. Acopy of these notices is contained in ATTACHMENT 2.

Letters were sent to those persons and/or organisations directly affected by theRoads (Opening and Closing) process (i.e. property owners adjacent to theGrenfell Street - East Terrace intersection).

The relevant documents were made available at the offices of the Adelaide CityCouncil and at the office of the Surveyor General. The Preliminary Plan could alsobe viewed on the Adelaide City Council's website.

A period of 28 days was provided for objections and/or applications foreasements. The closing date for submissions was 21 October 2015.

A total of thirty (30) submissions were received. A summary of the objectionsand/or applications for easements are contained in ATTACHMENT 3, togetherwith copies of the original submissions in ATTACHMENT 4.

Pursuant to section 14 of the Act, where a person makes an objection orapplication, the relevant authority must notify that person in writing of a time andplace at which a meeting will be held to consider the objection or application.

5. RELEVANT AUTHORITY CHANGE

Following lodgement of DA 020/L073/15, the Council - in consultation with theDepartment of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure (DPTI) - agreed that theCommission had become the relevant authority to undertake a hearing ofobjectors and those parties seeking easements.

The Commission would also be responsible for making any road process order.

The administrative change in 'relevant authority' was reviewed and endorsed bythe Crown Solicitors Office.

6. ASSESSMENT

In assessing the proposed road closure, the Commission is required to haveregard to Section 16 of the Act:

(a) any objections made by any person pursuant to this Act; and

(b) the plans, principles, regulations and other matters to which regard must behad by assessment authorities for determining applications for development

AGENDA ITEM 3.3


8

authorisation under the Development Act 1993 in relation to developments inthe area to which the proposed road process order relates; and

(c) whether the land subject to the road process is reasonably required as a roadfor public use in view of present and likely future needs in the area; and

(d) alternative uses of the land subject to the road process that would benefit thepublic or a section of the public; and

(e) any other matter that the authority considers relevant”.

The following is an assessment of the proposed road closure against the above:

(a) any objections made by any person pursuant to this Act;

The objections and/or applications for easements together with recommendationshave been summarised in a table (contained in ATTACHMENT 3).

The majority of the objections relate to the public consultation process undertakenby the Adelaide City Council and the jurisdiction of this authority to initiate theroads process under the Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991. In summary,these concerns are as follows:

o the Council has failed to provide relevant information;o relevant documents were not on public display, resulting in a denial of

access to relevant information to provide a responseo Council had failed to prepare a proper statement of Affected Persons, and

failed to give proper statutory notice to those persons (i.e. all residentsand ratepayers of the City of Adelaide);

o the road process is not in accordance with relevant legislation.

The Crown Solicitors Office has reviewed the statutory processes undertaken bythe Council and these were found to be consistent with the requirements of theAct. Furthermore, there was found to be no reason that DAC cannot continue withthe Roads process.

A total of three submissions related to the granting of easements:

o APA Group - location of gas mains within the sections of proposed roadclosure. Further information is required prior to the consideration ofwhether an easement or the capping / relocation of the gas mains is themost appropriate course of action.

o ElectraNet - maintains an interest in a right of way over "B" in Allotment10 of DP74256, with an on-going requirement for heavy vehicle accessfrom the new road alignment (described as "1") to maintain high voltageelectricity infrastructure. A fibre optic cable for telecommunicationspurposes also crosses through the path of the new road alignment. Aseparate easement may be required for this infrastructure.

No objection is raised by either infrastructure provider on these basis therespective infrastructure requirements are satisfied.

AGENDA ITEM 3.3


9

o The submission of K Henderson objected to the Council process and thedesignation of the Park Lands as Crown Land, being originally dedicated forthe 'inhabitants of the City of Adelaide as public walks in perpetuity'.

o This

In summary, it is considered that the applications for infrastructure easementscan be addressed by way of granting of easements and / or rights of way. Thematters raised concerning the legitimacy of the process, the notification ofaffected persons and interests and the adequacy of the supplied documentation, itappears all processes have been undertaken in accordance with acceptedadministrative practices and legislative requirements. It is also noted that noadjoining landowner or occupier, outside of existing utility and infrastructureproviders, lodged a submission with the Council / Surveyor-General.

The DPTI project team have also advised the Commission that the TandanyaNational Aboriginal Cultural Institute (253 Grenfell Street) are currentlynegotiating a Heads of Agreement with the Department to ensure accessarrangements and off-street carparks are maintained for this facility.

(b) the plans, principles, regulations and other matters to which regard must behad by assessment authorities for determining applications for developmentauthorisation under the Development Act 1993 in relation to developments inthe area to which the proposed road process order relates;

The proposed road closure is directly related to a development application (DA020/L073/15). This application is currently under assessment and has beenprocessed in accordance with the Development Act 1993 - including relevantreferral and notification processes (where applicable). The Commission willconsider this proposal at its meeting of 11 February 2016.

(c) whether the land subject to the road process is reasonably required as a road forpublic use in view of present and likely future needs in the area;

The East Terrace realignment is required to allow for a link from the O-Bahn CityAccess Tunnel to Grenfell Street. This new link will extend from the eastern side ofthe intersection of Grenfell Street and East Terrace and requires the southernsection of East Terrace to be realigned so that it extends from the southern side ofthe intersection of Grenfell Street and East Terrace.

Options were considered in the design process - including a straightening of EastTerrace to create a new intersection (t-junction) with Pirie Street. However, withlarge proportions of traffic travelling north-south along East Terrace and HuttStreet, this traffic would have to negotiate two T-Junctions instead of the existingfour-way intersection. Similarly, north-south traffic travelling through both t-junctions would have to stop along Pirie Street to wait for an opening so that theycan cross the on-coming traffic.

At the southern end of East Terrace (immediately north of Pirie Street / BartelsRoad), a small area of East Terrace is currently used during the Clipsal 500 as anemergency run-off area for race vehicles as they turn from Hutt Street ontoBartels Road. To ensure that there are no changes to the race route, thesouthern-most section of East Terrace must be aligned north-south to provide thisrun-off area.

AGENDA ITEM 3.3


10

East Terrace will remain a public thoroughfare. The road process is to realign theexisting road to ensure the safety and efficiency of vehicles, pedestrians andbicycles through a redesigned Grenfell Street / East Terrace intersection inassociation with the O-Bahn City Access Project.

(d) alternative uses of the land subject to the road process that would benefitthe public or a section of the public;

The existing 'pocket' park (comprising a fountain, grassed areas and matureamenity trees) located on the corner of Pirie Street and East Terrace will bereduced in size, whilst surplus land - comprising the existing alignment of EastTerrace (along the its eastern side) - will be returned to Rymill Park. At thecompletion of works, there will be a small, net increase in land available for ParkLands use.

The re-alignment of East Terrace - by shifting the Grenfell Street and East Terracesection further west - increases the size of Rymill Park (to the east of theroadway) providing a larger area for passive recreation and community use. TheDPTI project team have advised that this change will require the removal of tworegulated trees (to be considered under DA 020/L073/15) and the relocation ofthe existing fountain. The new location will be determined in consultation withACC and Tandanya.

(e) any other matter that the authority considers relevant

Property access has been maintained for affected landowners. East Terrace will continue to function as a cross city connector road under the

care and control of the Adelaide City Council. Rymill Park and Rundle Parks will continue to be accessible for public and

community use and be connected with existing and/or upgraded paths. On-Street carparking will continue to be provided on Rundle Road. Urban design improvements are to be implemented with the O-Bahn project.

7. NEXT STEPS

A road process order can be made following the DAC meeting as required undersection 14 of the Act and once Agreement for Transfer has been provided by theAdelaide City Council.

In the event that a road process order is made, it must be forwarded to theSurveyor-General for review together with:

o a survey plano a certified plan (a paper copy of the survey plan containing a certificate of

approval by the council)o a copy of the minutes of all Council and Commission meetings held in

relation to the processo any other documents or advice as instructed by the Surveyor General

The Surveyor General will review the above documentation upon receipt and mayseek expert advice on any aspect of the order as deemed necessary and may, inconsultation with the Commission (or its delegate), correct any error or deficiencyin the order.

AGENDA ITEM 3.3


11

Notice in writing of any amendment shall be given by the Surveyor-General to theCommission which in turn must notify any person affected.

At the same time as the Surveyor-General carries out the review of the order,examination and approval of the survey plan will be processed by the Lands TitlesDivision. This process will include the surveyor attending to errors or deficienciesin the plan and data, if any.

Once the review of the order has been completed, the Surveyor General willforward the Road Process Order and make a report and recommendation to theMinister as to whether the order should be ‘confirmed’ (conditional on approvaland deposit of the survey plan by the Registrar-General).

If the Minister declines to confirm the order, the Surveyor-General must givenotice in writing of that decision to the council, which must in turn notify anyperson affected.

8. CONCLUSION

Based on the scope and nature of the proposed changes, a consideration of theobjections (which relate to procedural matters) and the accommodation of thoseapplications for easements from affected landowners and infrastructure providersreceived during the public notification period, it is recommended that theCommission issue a Road Process Order.

9. RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that the Development Assessment Commission:

1. Resolve to make a Road Process Order in respect of Road Processes 15/0026;

and

2. Delegate authority to make the said Road Process Order to the GeneralManager, Investment Management to finalise technical details of the roadclosure and opening, including the granting of easements and rights of waywhere considered appropriate.

Simon NeldnerTeam Leader – Regional and Out of CouncilsInvestment Management | Development Division (DPTI)

AGENDA ITEM 3.3

8.5

GREN

FELL

STR

EET

PIRI

E ST

REET

BART

ELS

ROAD

EAST TERRACE

EAST TERRACE

ROAD

OPE

NING

LEGE

NDRO

AD C

LOSI

NG

neldnes

Text Box

Attachment 1

BARTELS ROADS

BOTANIC ROAD

HACK

NEY

ROAD

DEQU

ETTE

VILLE

TERR

ACE

UN

CO

NT

RO

LLE

D C

OP

Y W

HE

N P

RIN

TE

DA

ME

ND

ME

NT

D

ES

CR

IP

TIO

NB

YN

o.

DA

TE

100

M

IL

LIM

ET

RE

S O

N O

RIG

IN

AL D

RA

WIN

GA

LL

D

IM

EN

SIO

NS

A

RE

IN

M

ET

RE

S U

NLE

SS

S

HO

WN

O

TH

ER

WIS

E

Go

ve

rn

me

nt

of S

ou

th

A

us

tra

lia

Departm

ent of P

lanning,

Transport and Infrastructure

NC

RN

O-B

AH

N C

IT

Y A

CC

ES

S

& P

AR

KL

AN

D R

EJU

VE

NA

TIO

N P

RO

JE

CT

CO

NC

EP

T D

ES

IG

N

RO

AD

O

PE

NIN

G A

ND

C

LO

SIN

G

DP

TI-S

KT

-73

04-01

-1

00

2B

XX

XX

XX

XX

CB

JD

CB

AFO

R IN

FORM

ATIO

NJD

14/05

/15B

APPR

OVAL

ARE

AS ID

ENTI

FIED

29/07

/15

GRENFELL ST

ROAD

CLO

SING

ROAD

CLO

SED

IN S

TRAT

UM

LEGE

NDRO

AD O

PENI

NGRO

AD C

LOSI

NG

ROAD

OPE

NING

ROAD

CLO

SED

IN S

TRAT

UM

SCAL

E 1:1

000 A

T A1

PAP

ER S

IZE

GREN

FELL

STR

EET

PIRI

E ST

REET

BART

ELS

ROAD

EAST TERRACE

EAST TERRACEU

NC

ON

TR

OL

LE

D C

OP

Y W

HE

N P

RIN

TE

DA

ME

ND

ME

NT

D

ES

CR

IP

TIO

NB

YN

o.

DA

TE

10

0 M

IL

LIM

ET

RE

S O

N O

RIG

IN

AL D

RA

WIN

GA

LL D

IM

EN

SIO

NS

A

RE

IN

M

ET

RE

S U

NLE

SS

S

HO

WN

O

TH

ER

WIS

E

Go

ve

rn

me

nt

of S

ou

th

A

us

tra

lia

Departm

ent of P

lanning,


NC

RN

EA

ST

T

ER

RA

CE

PIR

IE

S

TE

ET

- G

RE

NF

EL

L S

TR

EE

T

RO

AD

O

PE

NIN

G A

ND

C

LO

SIN

G

20

14

01

20

8_

SK

001

A2

01

40

12

08

MC

DX

XX

XX

X

AIN

ITIA

L ISS

UE F

OR D

AC R

EPOR

TAN

C12

.01.16

010

510

2015

ROAD

OPE

NING

LEGE

NDRO

AD C

LOSI

NGLE

GEND BI

TUME

N ED

GELA

NE LI

NE

CONT

INUI

TY LI

NEED

GE LI

NE

PEDE

STRI

AN C

ROSS

WAL

K LIN

ETU

RN LI

NE

8.5

GREN

FELL

STR

EET

PIRI

E ST

REET

BART

ELS

ROAD

EAST TERRACE

EAST TERRACE

UN

CO

NT

RO

LL

ED

C

OP

Y W

HE

N P

RIN

TE

DA

ME

ND

ME

NT

D

ES

CR

IP

TIO

NB

YN

o.

DA

TE

10

0 M

IL

LIM

ET

RE

S O

N O

RIG

IN

AL

D

RA

WIN

GA

LL

D

IM

EN

SIO

NS

A

RE

IN

M

ET

RE

S U

NL

ES

S S

HO

WN

O

TH

ER

WIS

E

Go

ve

rn

me

nt

of S

ou

th

A

us

tra

lia

Departm

ent of P

lanning,


NC

RN

EA

ST

T

ER

RA

CE

PIR

IE

S

TE

ET

- G

RE

NF

ELL

S

TR

EE

T

RO

AD

O

PE

NIN

G A

ND

C

LO

SIN

G

20

14

01

208

_S

K00

1A

20

14

01

20

8M

CD

XX

XX

XX

AIN

ITIA

L ISS

UE F

OR D

AC R

EPOR

TAN

C12

.01.16

010

510

2015

ROAD

OPE

NING

LEGE

NDRO

AD C

LOSI

NG

LEGE

ND BITU

MEN

EDGE

LANE

LINE

CO

NTIN

UITY

LINE

EDGE

LINE

PEDE

STRI

AN C

ROSS

WAL

K LIN

ETU

RN LI

NE

EXIS

TING

BOU

NDAR

Y

neldnes

Text Box

Attachment 2

-----Original Message-----From: Richard MackieSent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 9:22:18 PMTo: City Email,[email protected]: Road Opening and Closing East Terrace /,Rundle Road, Adelaide

CEO Mark GoldstoneAdelaide City Council

I give notice that I object to the proposed road process for the following reasons.

The Adelaide City Council has failed to comply with and has breached legislative requirements in that thenotice given pursuant to section 10 of the Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991 has caused thepublic consultation process to be defective as:• the documents were not on public display, the Council has failed to prepare a properStatement of Affected Persons, and hence failed to give statutory notice to those persons, andmany other residents and ratepayers of the City of Adelaide whose rights & entitlements areaffected.• the Council has failed to provide relevant information as long ago as 9 October.

Denying access to related relevant material denies people reasonable opportunity to make an informedsubmission.

In addition to breaching statutory requirements, the denial of equitable statutory notice is not onlyunlawful, but also discriminatory in that some people are treated more favourably by Council, andothers less favourably.

The failure to comply with legislative requirements must be rectified forthwith.

Yours faithfully

Richard J Mackie

[email protected] Union St.,Beulah Park.SA 5067

neldnes

Text Box

Attachment 3

From: Catherine CampbellSent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 9:22:34 PMTo: City EmailCc: [email protected]: Road Opening and Closing East Terrace / Rundle Road, Adelaide


Road Opening and Closing East Terrace / Rundle Road, Adelaide

I give notice that I object to the proposed road process for the following reasons

The Adelaide City Council has failed to comply with and has breached legislative requirements in that thenotice givenpursuant to section 10 of the Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991 has caused the public consultation

process to be defective as:• the documents were not on public display the Council has failed to prepare a proper Statement of Affected Persons, and hence failed to givestatutory notice to those persons,

and many other residents and ratepayers of the City of Adelaide whose rights & entitlements areaffected.• the Council has failed to provide relevant information as long ago as 9 October.


In addition to breaching statutory requirements, the denial of equitable statutory notice is not onlyunlawful, but also discriminatoryin that some people are treated more favourably by Council, and others less favourably.


Yours faithfully

Catherine Campbell

267 Carrington St Adelaide

-----Original Message-----

From: Carol FaulknerSent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 8:50:27 PMTo: City EmailCc: [email protected]: Objection to proposal to realign portion of East Tce and close portion of EastTce and Rundle Road

Mark GoldstoneChief Executive OfficerAdelaide City Council

Re: Road Opening and Closing East Terrace / Rundle Road, Adelaide

I object to the proposal to:i. open as road a portion of Allotment 10 in Deposited Plan 74256 (Park Lands) betweenGrenfell Street and Pirie Street, more particularly delineated and numbered ‘1’ on thePreliminary Plan No. 15/0026, forming a realignment of East Terrace; andii. close and vest in the Crown, portion of East Terrace situated between Grenfell Streetand Pirie Street and portion of Rundle Road (below ground level) situated between East Terraceand Dequetteville Terrace, more particularly delineated and lettered ‘A’ and ‘B’ respectively onthe Preliminary Plan No. 15/0026.

I object to the proposal on the grounds that the Adelaide City Council failed to comply withlegislative requirements in that the notice given pursuant to section 10 of the Roads (Openingand Closing) Act 1991 caused the public consultation process to be defective because:· the documents were not on public display.· the Council failed to prepare a proper Statement of Affected Persons, and hence failed togive statutory notice to those persons, and many other residents and ratepayers of the City ofAdelaide whose rights & entitlements are affected.· the Council failed to provide relevant information.Denying access to related relevant material denies people reasonable opportunity to make aninformed submission. In addition to breaching statutory requirements, the denial of equitablestatutory notice is not only unlawful, but also discriminatory in that some people are treated morefavourably by Council, and others less favourably. The failure to comply with legislativerequirements must be rectified forthwith.

Yours faithfully,

Carol FaulknerConcerned citizen and user of the Adelaide Park Lands18 Percy Street, Cheltenham SA 5014T 84477123 M 0421691604 E [email protected]

-----Original Message-----From: Anne + HansSent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 3:35:32 PMTo: City EmailCc: [email protected]: Road opening and closing East Terrace / Rundle Road, Adelaide



Dear Mark

We give notice that we object to the proposed road process for the following reasons

The Adelaide City Council has failed to comply with and has breached legislative requirementsin that the notice givenpursuant to section 10 of the Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991 has caused the public

consultation process to be defective as:• the documents were not on public display· the Council has failed to prepare a proper Statement of Affected Persons, and hence failedto give statutory notice to those persons,

and many other residents and ratepayers of the City of Adelaide whose rights & entitlementsare affected.• the Council has failed to provide relevant information as long ago as 9 October.

Denying access to related relevant material denies people reasonable opportunity to make aninformed submission.

In addition to breaching statutory requirements, the denial of equitable statutory notice is notonly unlawful, but also discriminatoryin that some people are treated more favourably by Council, and others less favourably.


Yours faithfully

Anne & Hans Gowin16 Headingley StreetHope Valley. SA. 5090

-----Original Message-----From: Malgorzata SchmidtSent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 2:53:01 PMTo: City Email,[email protected]: Rymill Park


Your actions re: Road Opening and Closing East Terrace / Rundle Road,Adelaide amount to criminal insanity and are illegal



process to be defective as:

* the documents were not on public display the Council has failed to prepare a proper Statement of Affected Persons, and hence failed to givestatutory notice to those persons,

and many other residents and ratepayers of the City of Adelaide whose rights & entitlements areaffected.* the Council has failed to provide relevant information as long ago as 9 October.

Please, refrain from destruction of the most popular City Park, used for Fringe, Zombie Walk andlots of other extremely popular public events.Thank you.

Faithfully yours

Malgo Schmidt2/3 Fife St, Woodville South SA [email protected]

-----Original Message-----From: Richard HuppatzSent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 1:13:56 PMTo: City EmailSubject: Road Opening and Closing East Terrace / Rundle Road, Adelaide

Road Opening and Closing East Terrace / Rundle Road, AdelaideI give notice that I object to the proposed road process for the following reasonsThe Adelaide City Council has failed to comply with and has breached legislative requirements in that thenotice givenpursuant to section 10 of the Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991 has caused the public consultation


and many other residents and ratepayers of the City of Adelaide whose rights & entitlements areaffected.• the Council has failed to provide relevant information as long ago as 9 October.Denying access to related relevant material denies people reasonable opportunity to make an informedsubmission.In addition to breaching statutory requirements, the denial of equitable statutory notice is not onlyunlawful, but also discriminatoryin that some people are treated more favourably by Council, and others less favourably.The failure to comply with legislative requirements must be rectified forthwith.Yours faithfullyYour Name …Richard Huppatz…………………………………………….Your address 1001/47 Hindmarsh Square ADELAIDE 5000

From: Rod EvinsSent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 1:06:28 PMTo: City Email,[email protected]: O'Bahn

To CEO Mark Goldstone,Adelaide City Council.Please see attached notification

From,

Rod Evins

Banner Mitre10Norwood | Blackwood | Glenelg | Greenfields | Mt Gambier | Millicent | NaracoorteAdministration | 2 Fullarton Rd Norwood SA 5067AAOffice: Ph: (08) 8362 8992 Fax: (08) 8363 1086| Mob: 0409 747 819OOEmail: [email protected] | Website: www.bannermitre10.com





consultation process to be defective as:

* the documents were not on public display· the Council has failed to prepare a proper Statement of Affected Persons, and hence failedto give statutory notice to those persons,

and many other residents and ratepayers of the City of Adelaide whose rights & entitlementsare affected.

* the Council has failed to provide relevant information as long ago as 9 October.




Yours faithfully

KarenKaren Inwood of2 Fraser St Lower Mitcham, 5062Head of Halstead House (Middle School)Teacher of Drama

St John's Grammar School29 Gloucester Avenue Belair SA 5052

T: 8278 0260

www.stjohns.sa.edu.au<http://www.stjohns.sa.edu.au/>

From: "City Email" <[email protected]>Sent: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:51:04 +1030To: "Central Records 2" <[email protected]>Subject: FW: O-Bahn-(Opening and Closing) Act 1991 (CID:w5$x1f943fwgf0xkgh)

Hello

To CEO Mark GoldstoneAdelaide City Council

I am writing to you about the:Road Opening and Closing East Terrace / Rundle Road, Adelaide.


The Adelaide City Council has failed to comply with and has breached legislative requirements in that the noticegiven pursuant to section 10 of the Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991 has caused the public consultationprocess to be defective as:

* the documents were not on public display

· the Council has failed to prepare a proper Statement of Affected Persons, and hence failed to give statutorynotice to those persons,

and many other residents and ratepayers of the City of Adelaide whose rights & entitlements are affected.

* the Council has failed to provide relevant information as long ago as 9 October.

Denying access to related relevant material denies people reasonable opportunity to make an informed submission.

In addition to breaching statutory requirements, the denial of equitable statutory notice is not only unlawful, but alsodiscriminatoryin that some people are treated more favourably by Council, and others less favourably.


Thank you,

Elise Fechner

History, Geography and RAVE TeacherSt John’s Grammar School29 Gloucester AvenueBelair SA 5052Tel: 8278 0261

www.stjohns.sa.edu.au<http://www.stjohns.sa.edu.au/>

-----Original Message-----From: Philip GrovesSent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 10:59:37 AMTo: City EmailCc: [email protected]: O-Bahn project in Park Lands





process to be defective as:• the documents were not on public display• the Council has failed to prepare a proper Statement of Affected Persons, and hence failedto give statutory notice to those persons, and many other residents and ratepayers of the Cityof Adelaide whose rights & entitlements are affected

• the Council has failed to provide relevant information as long ago as 9 October.




Yours faithfully

Philip Groves

Philip Groves27 Castres StreetGlynde SA 5070Tel: +61 8 8336 84

-----Original Message-----From: Sue FiedlerSent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 10:10:34 AMTo: City EmailCc: [email protected]: Road Opening and Closing East Terrace / Rundle Road, Adelaide



The Adelaide City Council has failed to comply with and has breached legislative requirementsin that the notice givenpursuant to section 10 of the Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991 has caused the publicconsultation process to be defective as:• the documents were not on public display• the Council has failed to prepare a proper Statement of Affected Persons, and hencefailed to give statutory notice to those persons,





Yours faithfully

Sue Fiedler5 Whyte Street, Somerton Park SA 5044

T. + 61 (08) 8313 4729E. [email protected]

CRICOS Provider Number 00123M-----------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----From: Jim ScammellSent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 10:38:51 AMTo: City EmailCc: [email protected]: Road Opening and Closing East Terrace / Rundle Road, Adelaide


Road Opening and Closing East Terrace / Rundle Road, AdelaideI give notice that I object to the proposed road process for the following reasons.The Adelaide City Council has failed to comply with and has breached legislative requirementsin that the notice given pursuant to section 10 of the Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991 hascaused the public consultation process to be defective as:• the documents were not on public display, the Council has failed to prepare a properStatement of Affected Persons, and hence failed to give statutory notice to those persons, andmany other residents and ratepayers of the City of Adelaide whose rights & entitlements areaffected.• the Council has failed to provide relevant information as long ago as 9 October.Denying access to related relevant material denies people reasonable opportunity to make aninformed submission.In addition to breaching statutory requirements, the denial of equitable statutory notice is notonly unlawful, but also discriminatory in that some people are treated more favourably byCouncil, and others less favourably.The failure to comply with legislative requirements must be rectified forthwith.

Yours faithfullyJames W Scammell

27 Fifth AvenueST PETERS SA 5069AUSTRALIA+61 (8) 8362 1177+61 (0) 488 922 632

-----Original Message-----From: Robert MackirdySent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 10:01:50 AMTo:Subject:

[email protected]

CEO Mark Goldstone.

Please find attached my letter.

Yours faithfully

R.A MacKirdy

CEO Mark GoldstoneAdelaide City CouncilRoad Opening and Closing East Terrace / Rundle Road, Adelaide

I give notice that I object to the proposed road process for the following reasonsThe Adelaide City Council has failed to comply with and has breached legislative requirements in that thenotice given pursuant to section 10 of the Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991 has caused the publicconsultation process to be defective as:

1. The documents were not on public display.2. The Council has failed to prepare a proper Statement of Affected Persons, and hence failed to

give statutory notice to those persons, and many other residents and ratepayers of the City ofAdelaide whose rights & entitlements are affected.

3. The Council has failed to provide relevant information as long ago as 9 October.




Yours faithfully

R.A MacKirdy

21st October 15

-----Original Message-----From: Sutcliffe, Carmel Chiu - sutcc002Sent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 9:39:00 AMTo: City EmailCc: [email protected]: Road Opening and Closing East Terrace / Rundle Road, Adelaide










Sincerely,

Carmel Sutcliffe306/22 Ifould Street, Adelaide, SA 5000

-----Original Message-----From: Lee RyanSent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 9:17:31 AMTo: City EmailCc: [email protected]: Road Opening and Closing East Terrace / Rundle Road, Adelaide










Yours faithfully

Lee Ryan

-----Original Message-----From: Leo NoicosSent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 8:58:12 AMTo: City EmailCc: [email protected]: Adelaide City Council and Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991




The Adelaide City Council has failed to comply with and has breached legislative requirementsin that the notice givenpursuant to section 10 of the Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991 has caused the publicconsultation process to be defective as:• the documents were not on public display• the Council has failed to prepare a proper Statement of Affected Persons, and hencefailed to give statutory notice to those persons,• and many other residents and ratepayers of the City of Adelaide whose rights &entitlements are affected.• the Council has failed to provide relevant information as long ago as 9 October.




Yours faithfully

Leo Noicos12 Torrens StreetCollege Park SA 5069

-----Original Message-----From: David EllisSent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 9:05:38 AMTo: City EmailSubject: Road closure






and many other residents and ratepayers of the City of Adelaidewhose rights & entitlementsare affected.• the Council has failed to provide relevant information as long ago as 9 October.




Yours faithfully

David Ellis15 Third AveSt Peters+61417260002

-----Original Message-----From: Bob LawsSent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 8:43:59 AMTo: City Email,[email protected]: Fw: Adelaide City Couincil and Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991




The Adelaide City Council has failed to comply with and has breached legislative requirements in that thenotice givenpursuant to section 10 of the Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991 has caused the public consultationprocess to be defective as:• the documents were not on public display the Council has failed to prepare a proper Statement of Affected Persons, and hence failed to givestatutory notice to those persons,





Yours faithfully

Your Name ……Glenyss Steedman………………………………………….

Your address …1/366 South Terrace Adelaide 5000……………………………………….

-----Original Message-----From: Rick MooreSent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 10:28:27 PMTo: City EmailCc: [email protected]: objection to road access










Yours faithfully

Rick Moore

39 Hay Rd Linden Park 5065

-----Original Message-----From: G GrovesSent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 8:42:30 AMTo: City EmailCc: [email protected]: O-Bahn tunnel





process to be defective as:• the documents were not on public display• the Council has failed to prepare a proper Statement of Affected Persons, and hence failedto give statutory notice to those persons, and many other residents and ratepayers of the Cityof Adelaide whose rights & entitlements are affected

• the Council has failed to provide relevant information as long ago as 9 October.




Yours faithfully

Gunta Groves--

Gunta Groves27 Castres StreetGlynde SA 5070Tel: +61 8 8336 8424Mobile: 0417 808 120

-----Original Message-----From: Amanda Allport-HallerSent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 9:35:25 PMTo: City EmailCc: [email protected]: Road Opening and Closing East Terrace / Rundle Road, Adelaide

CEO Mark GoldstoneAdelaide City CouncilRoad Opening and Closing East Terrace / Rundle Road, AdelaideI give notice that I object to the proposed road process for the following reasonsThe Adelaide City Council has failed to comply with and has breached legislative requirements in that thenotice givenpursuant to section 10 of the Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991 has caused the public consultation


and many other residents and ratepayers of the City of Adelaide whose rights & entitlements areaffected.• the Council has failed to provide relevant information as long ago as 9 October.Denying access to related relevant material denies people reasonable opportunity to make an informedsubmission.In addition to breaching statutory requirements, the denial of equitable statutory notice is not onlyunlawful, but also discriminatoryin that some people are treated more favourably by Council, and others less favourably.The failure to comply with legislative requirements must be rectified forthwith.Yours faithfullyDr Amanda Allport-Haller65 MCDonnell AvenueWest Hindmarsh SA 5007

[email protected]

-----Original Message-----From: Judy SinghSent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 10:28:30 PMTo: City EmailCc: [email protected]: Road Opening and Closing East Terrace / Rundle Road, Adelaide










Yours faithfully

Your Name ……Judy Singh………………………………………….

Your address …61 Highfield Ave, St Georges. 5064…………………………………….

-----Original Message-----From: Winston StorerSent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 1:11:17 AMTo: City EmailCc: [email protected]: Objection: Road Opening and Closure East Terrace / Rundle Road








In addition to breaching statutory requirements, the denial of equitable statutory notice is not onlyunlawful, but also discriminatory in that some people are treated more favourably by Council, andothers less favourably.


Yours faithfully,

Dr Winston Storer

[email protected]

3/27 Flinders St,Kent Town SA 5067

-----Original Message-----From: Kirsty MackirdySent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 9:01:17 PMTo: City Email,[email protected]: roads opening and closing acts










Yours faithfully

Kirsty Mackirdypo box 391 Tanunda SA 53522 Attachments

Kirsty Kirsty Mackirdy

Mob: 0423855751email: [email protected]: [email protected]

-----Original Message-----From: Dario CentrellaSent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 10:23:06 PMTo: City EmailCc: [email protected]: Road Opening and Closing East Terrace / Rundle Road, Adelaide


I give notice that I object to the proposed road process for the following reasons,

The Adelaide City Council has failed to comply with and has breached legislative requirementsin that the notice given pursuant to section 10 of the Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991 hascaused the public consultation process to be defective as:

- the documents were not on public display- the Council has failed to prepare a proper Statement of Affected Persons, and hence failed to

give statutory notice to those persons, and many other residents and ratepayers of the City ofAdelaide whose rights & entitlements are affected.- the Council has failed to provide relevant information as long ago as 9 October.


In addition to breaching statutory requirements, the denial of equitable statutory notice is notonly unlawful, but also discriminatory in that some people are treated more favourably byCouncil, and others less favourably.


Yours faithfully,

Dario Centrella7 Ridge Ave,Myrtle Bank

-----Original Message-----From: craig masonSent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 10:11:38 PMTo: City Email,Peter RoussosSubject: Road Opening and Closing East Terrace / Rundle Road, Adelaide




The Adelaide City Council has failed to comply with and has breached legislativerequirements in that the notice givenpursuant to section 10 of the Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991 has caused thepublic consultation process to be defective as:• the documents were not on public display the Council has failed to prepare a proper Statement of Affected Persons, andhence failed to give statutory notice to those persons,

and many other residents and ratepayers of the City of Adelaide whose rights &entitlements are affected.• the Council has failed to provide relevant information as long ago as 9 October.

Denying access to related relevant material denies people reasonable opportunity tomake an informed submission.

In addition to breaching statutory requirements, the denial of equitable statutory noticeis not only unlawful, but also discriminatoryin that some people are treated more favourably by Council, and others less favourably.


Yours faithfully

Craig Mason

Golden Grove

From: Dennis ColemanSent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 4:09:01 PMTo: City Email,[email protected]: alarm re EAST Tce and tunnel developments

Dear Adelaide CITY COUNCIL members/ Peter Roussos -SA govt.

The following information has come to my attention. I find this lack of transparency on the partof the government to be an erosion of our democratic rights and would appear to be yet anotherinstance of a deceitful way of gaining further control of the Adelaide park lands.

"The Adelaide City Council want to use the Roads (Opening and Closing) Act to Grant to theGovernment- the right to move part of East Terrace to where the Tandanya Fountain is currently located and- to give the Government the right to have a tunnel under Rundle Road.

The attached notice from the Adelaide City Council re moving East Terrace around Tandanya and thetunnel under Rundle Road is supposed, by legislation- to be provided to all the residents and ratepayers of the City of Adelaide. and- The notice was not made public as required until the 9th October and then only available duringoffice hours- when it must, by legislative requirements, be on public display 24 hours a day.

You will see that the notice is undated.You will also see that if you use or have used the park lands, and you may be affected by theproposal, that you can apply for an easement to be granted in your favour over the land that is subjectto the proposed closure."

I intend raising this with the followers of Aurora Heritage Action inc and its extensive heritageand community associates.

Dennis G Coleman

80 West St,Torrensville, SA 50310422 850 975

PO Box 59North Adelaide SA 5006Adelaide City [email protected]: Office of the Surveyor-Generalc/- Peter [email protected] and Application for EasementCity of Adelaide Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991 East Terrace / Rundle Road,Adelaide

To whom it may concern,I hereby reiterate my objections to the Adelaide City Council’s and make application for anEasement in my favour, pursuant to the Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991 (SA) s 13.ObjectionThe current process affects land that is not waste lands of the Crown, nor Crown land,having been purchased in fee simple absolute in 1839 (see enclosed Bills Payable and ParkLands News) and dedicated as a special-purpose Trust for the inhabitants of the City ofAdelaide for public walks in perpetuity.The current process is defective in that it:

failed to comply with the Act s 9 (1)(b)(i) and

failed to comply with the Act s 10.

Is proposed based on errors of fact on the documents relied upon (Crown Records) Intends a road process order that would comprise a breach of trust Intends a road process order that would comprise a breach of fiduciary duty Proposes a breach of the Local Government Act Proposes to damage the Adelaide Park Lands and City Layout National HeritagePlace.

Application for EasementLocationParticulars of the location of the easement requested are detailed in Preliminary Plan No.15/0026 (Attached), the areas numbered ‘1’, ‘A’, and ‘B’.Nature of EasementFor use for existing purposes and as Adelaide Park Lands in accordance with the originalreservation and dedication of the land as a special-purpose Trust for the inhabitants of theCity of Adelaide as public walks in perpetuity.

I hereby require thatthe current defective process be ceased forthwith,the errors and omissions be rectified, andCouncil undertake all such processes in accordance, and in compliance with the legalrequirements, and particularly with equitable, regard to the rights and entitlementsof the residents and ratepayers of the City of Adelaide.Kelly [email protected] 989 676PO Box 59North Adelaide SA 5006

---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Kelly Henderson < [email protected]>Date: Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 8:01 PMSubject: PP_26/2015 Statement to Plan DepositedTo: [email protected]_26/2015 Statement to Plan DepositedDear Mr Fryar,I note that the Schedule of Owners, Occupiers and Encumbrances Affected re PreliminaryPlan 15/0026 (Rymill & Rundle Park and associated roads) alleges that the "RegisteredProprietor" of Allotments 117 (D81642; Crown Record 6132/227), 11 (D74256; CrownRecord 6102/716) and 10 (D74256; CR 6102/715).Could you please provide the documents used to prepare that Schedule.Thanks in advance,Kelly [email protected] 989 676

r N t Our Reference: D74256AL 10

Thursday, 24 September2015

R Fryar Adelaide City Council G P 0 Box2252 Adelaide SA 5001

Dear Rocky,

re: Proposed Road Closure Ref: 15/0026; East Terrace, Adelaide

I refer to your letter/email dated 18/09/2015 regarding this proposal.

Transmission Lessor Corporation has an interest in the dominanttenement of the right of way described as "8" over Allotment 1 0 in 07 4256 appurtenantto the land in CT 61 02/715 which it holds as registered proprietor.

Notwithstandingthat a portion of this right of way will be extinguished by the road opening proposal, access from the new road alignment proposed (described as 1 on the plan) to the remainder of the right of way will still be required to enable heavy vehicles to maintain the high voltage electricity infrastructure on our site.

Electra Net also has an optic fibre telecommunicationscable that crosses through the path of the road alignment, an easement may be required over that portion of the existing road which is to be closed.

Provided that issues relating to access to the right of way and easement for the optic fibre cable are addressed, neither Electra Net nor the Transmission Lessor Corporation have an objection to the proposal.

Please do not hesitate to contact me directly on 08 84047342 should you require additional information.

Yours sincerely

~;;:

~Michael Bails ,~ .. ~ / .... Senior Property Advisor

bails.michael~lectranet.com .au

..

APT Management Servlces Pty Ltd

October 2015

Adelaide City Council PO Box 2252 ADELAIDE SA 5001

Dear Sir/Madam,

PROPOSED ROAD CLOSURE- ACC2015/188979.

091 668110

330 Grange Road

Kidman Park SA 5025

PO Box 171 Findon SA 5023

P: 61 8 8159 1661 F: 61 8 8353 5287

www.apa.com.au

Australian Gas Networks (SA) Ltd I APA Group have identified gas mains within sections of the proposed road closure and would object to this proposed closure.

When further information is received pertaining to the layout of the proposed development then a decision will be made whether to accept an easement or if an easement is not practical then the mains could be cut and capped and abandoned I and or have additional mains laid to enable the abandonment occur where ever practical however the costs to undertake these works would be borne by third and be conditional on the removal of any

Australian Gas Networks (SA) Ltd is the owner of the gas distribution networks in South Australia. APA Group has been by Australian Gas Networks (SA) Ltd to operate and manage these gas network assets on their behalf.

Should you require additional information or clarification, I can be contacted on the numbers below.

Kind Regards,

APA South Australian Networks 330 Rd, Kidman Park SA 5025 PO Box , Findon SA 5023

Office: 08 8159 1658 Mobile: 0418 853 508 Fax: 08 81591749

For and on behalf of

Australian Gas Networks Ltd

Page 1

0:?•

r o

"'

-_

A.

ei,

.;

2:1

'll

!3:38~

-1

~e

,~,D .

p

!"

0~

) t.

__

__

,ti-

:._.

::. _

_;

~·~

-o-~

,.. .....;

o __

L

. o1 CD -~

A_

o.m

:.:: ..

-_

..

-r

f s

5G2

SP

-

100

SP

IF

1

5

T

a. I 0

9

~:

--.,-

LOI

-----

~-

----

A'"

21~·)23

..J

Al4

9

~2~31

ow

cn

U.

Olll

05

77

0

22~n

r "(

5 1 2

l$

A 14

5 n~

.-13

r -

Atf>

()

2•l:

f59

~~-----

21~2)

Ai4o

31_·3

7 J~sO

u A

f43

A

t44

m <

0 z (/)

I ·:

:•3

::u

A~O

m

Aft

57,~

0

Ai5

2

s·~o

_, A8

Stf

O

A7

57-6

0

II

A6

lJ

57·6

0

At$

4

'o~

.__ o

uD

sr

• '2

66

A2

214-

276

.:00

"'"' r

~ , ,

. .~.

:,

2e

vroU

1 °·9

8 Ai

6s t'i

3 0

05

0

At

"'0

<:>-

o:-

-;;:

:

57~

AIS

3 IF

$7:1

0

Alt

2

I 9

f 0

61

N

U1

0 (j)

"'0

1 .Ja

r') M

D 1

M3

1.81

' o

sr

N

U1 63

"'0

1/

2l1Jl

§ti

l '....

SP

-

-~

I 7

. 1 O

<BP

b1 5

-.....,

N '

U1

vw

.x~~

63

---".~

"'0

25!:

258

ASS

7

!51·

259

G

AI0

2

25

0S

P

0'-

"

f3;p

A4

S S

A

217

I!;

25

0S

P

28~45

A5

28~?91

2~7

A2

'-'

AS

, j

25

0S

P

N ;..

Ill

2P3

29~2

97

All

A

t2

' ·,.. ID

299;

309

zee.

~Aiz

0 A9t

250

SP

j!)t

!2

"1

$-7 c

Aft

$

8·11

IF

f'\

(jj 3

0

.. S:

:SA

] ?.3

~!

A7

.S J

F3

29

t"tr

l0T1

S85)

A!

o e9

s U

1 IF

-

11-t

g ·~

-~

~

• l l

z ~

~· ,,

..;

17

.,

~ 2

'' • o

u

rsc;

• 1

.. ••

""

,, '=-

"?T

-v

1 ~

l!

--} 5

[3

· s-~1

25S

11

,, "id

.,l

l

0 -

(j)

"'0

80

SP

$1_

RE

EJo

PML

ON

A

.,.

g) (

jj O

N

C"l

:...

.

27~}

80 0

Il

l 1'1

~

i A

t6

tB A

S97

Alt

1.1

<:>"

' .... ~

0 Il

l

§.:.a

hg

10

00

0 Q

250C

I 2

50

CI

I

JO&

~~

<» "

-i

ow

'~20

30

il-~ ~

!2

Alt

8

t-.zo

All7

ol I

-8:'0

~

C

A94

~ 1:

20

•J

A83

p A9

3.1

8

S_B

F9

250C

I

~

Ail

e

21

0

25

£1

I .....

0 0 ()

15

81 0 0 Q

• 4

(

CLOS

ED

E_E~

TC

E

~

Q

''!:.'.' .r.. ~.

l\ .t

If -

250S

o

.d'it

1

(1)

!\)

• I

BO

TA

NIC

~

(/)

-I

,'f. 5£

~ , 8

, l

Hil

S Ali

G~•M

ENT T.

A~EN

FR

OM

E•T

0" R

Uil

DI.

f S

T 8

l

>

~

I ~~

1SO

CI

_"' __

_ ~

lg

o•..,

-(J)

ts ;;

;,. \

l

111_

-

-Av

i Fp

r r sO

SP .. .J~

·o,

041;

h

!!

-.

I' 8

;s

.

1. 1:

'f

j -

:

CC

f.

[

ftp

i~ j"

'f. i

t (.

':'K

:

·>

,,{\'I

_;:,..5

!------

~ ~

~ I

0

··

·--

--

-~("

' ..

.. \

0)"

•

"'

+:¥

~

. . "---rQ(j

~~ _

__

j 3

fC .. '

i I~

1

10

-I

()

m

RU

ND

LE

••01

1

··"'

/,..

.Y" ~~ /! ..

"''

g Q t\

0

,

s

RO

AD

......

·Iii \,.

0

~

..l

.:; .

~~

.,.. · ... ... ,

2

SUM

MAR

Y O

F O

BJEC

TIO

NS/

APPL

ICAT

ION

S FO

R EA

SEM

ENTS

REC

EIVE

D DU

RIN

G P

UBL

IC C

ON

SULT

ATIO

N–

RUN

DLE

STRE

ET A

ND

EAST

TER

RACE

RO

AD C

LOSU

RE &

OPE

NIN

G

Obj

ecto

rPr

elim

inar

y Pl

an 1

5/00

26Re

spon

se to

Obj

ectio

n/Ap

plic

atio

n fo

r Eas

emen

t

Rich

ard

Mac

kle

Cath

erin

e Ca

mpb

ell

Caro

l Fau

lkne

rAn

ne &

Han

s Goo

dwin

Mal

go S

chm

idt

Rich

ard

Hupp

atz

Rod

Evin

sKa

ren

Inw

ood

Elise

Fec

hner

Phili

p Gr

oves

Sue

Fied

ler

Jam

es S

cam

mel

lRo

bert

Mac

Kird

yCa

rmel

Sut

cliff

eLe

e Ry

anLe

o N

oico

sDa

vid

Ellis

Rick

Moo

reGl

enys

s Ste

edm

anGu

nta

Grov

esAm

anda

Allp

ort-

Halle

rJu

dy S

ingh

Dr W

inst

on S

tore

rKi

rsty

Mac

kird

yDa

rio C

entr

ella

Crai

g M

ason

(26)

Each

of t

hese

subm

issio

ns ra

ised

the

sam

eob

ject

ions

bas

ed o

nsim

ilar t

ext.

Defe

ctiv

e co

nsul

tatio

n pr

oces

s

-Do

cum

ents

not

on

publ

ic d

ispla

y-

Stat

emen

t of A

ffect

ed P

erso

ns d

efic

ient

and

notic

e no

t giv

en to

thos

e pe

rson

s-

Failu

re to

pro

vide

rele

vant

info

rmat

ion

The

stat

utor

y re

quire

men

ts o

f the

Roa

ds (O

peni

ngan

d Cl

osin

g) A

ct w

ere

follo

wed

by

the

Coun

cil–

incl

udin

g th

e re

quire

d no

tice,

the

stat

emen

t of

effe

cted

per

sons

, and

pro

visio

n of

rele

vant

info

rmat

ion:

-Di

rect

ly a

ffect

ed la

ndow

ners

and

eas

emen

tho

lder

s wer

e no

tifie

d of

the

prop

osed

road

ord

er-

A pu

blic

not

ice

was

pla

ced

in th

ene

wsp

aper

(Ade

laid

e Ad

vert

iser a

nd M

esse

nger

Pre

ss)

-A

28-d

ay n

otifi

catio

n pe

riod

was

pro

vide

d-

Pers

ons a

ffect

ed w

ere

dire

ctly

notif

ied

–th

e Ac

tdo

es n

ot re

quire

a p

erso

nal n

otic

e to

oth

erre

siden

ts a

nd ra

tepa

yers

of t

he C

ity o

f Ade

laid

e.-

The

requ

ired

docu

men

tatio

n w

as m

ade

avai

labl

e,bo

th in

har

d co

py a

nd o

nlin

e,du

ring

norm

al o

ffice

hour

s.

The

Crow

n So

licito

rs O

ffice

has

revi

ewed

the

proc

edur

al a

spec

ts o

f the

not

ifica

tion

proc

ess.

No

furt

her a

ctio

nis

requ

ired.

neldnes

Text Box

Attachment 4

Obj

ecto

rPr

elim

inar

y Pl

an 1

5/00

26Re

spon

se to

Obj

ectio

n/Ap

plic

atio

n fo

r Eas

emen

t

Denn

is Co

lem

an-

Adel

aide

City

Cou

ncil

are

seek

ing

tore

mov

e th

e Ta

ndan

ya fo

unta

in a

nd g

ive

the

Gove

rnm

ent t

he ri

ght t

o ha

ve a

tunn

el u

nder

Run

dle

Road

.-

Not

ice

shou

ld h

ave

been

to a

ll th

ere

siden

ts a

nd ra

tepa

yers

of t

he C

ity o

fAd

elai

de-

Requ

ired

notic

e w

as n

ot m

ade

publ

icun

til 9

thO

ctob

er 2

015

-Le

gisla

tive

requ

irem

ents

requ

irein

form

atio

n to

be

avai

labl

e24

hrs

per

day

The

stat

utor

y re

quire

men

ts o

f the

Roa

ds (O

peni

ngan

d Cl

osin

g) A

ct w

ere

follo

wed

by

the

Coun

cil–

incl

udin

g th

e re

quire

d no

tice,

the

stat

emen

t of

effe

cted

per

sons

, and

pro

visio

n of

rele

vant

info

rmat

ion:

-Th

ere

is no

requ

irem

ent u

nder

the

Act f

or p

erso

nal

notic

e to

be

prov

ided

to a

ll re

siden

ts a

ndra

tepa

yers

of t

he C

ity o

f Ade

laid

e.-

The

requ

isite

not

ices

wer

e pu

blish

ed in

the

Gaze

tte

on 1

7 Se

ptem

ber 2

015

and

in th

ene

wsp

aper

.-

Ther

e is

no re

quire

men

t for

info

rmat

ion

rela

ting

toa

road

s pro

cess

to b

e on

disp

lay

24 h

ours

per

day

.-

The

date

of t

he n

otic

e is

the

date

of t

he n

ewsp

aper

(the

sam

e as

the

Gaze

tte

date

).

The

Crow

n So

licito

rs O

ffice

has

revi

ewed

the

proc

edur

al a

spec

ts o

f the

not

ifica

tion

proc

ess.

No

furt

her a

ctio

n is

requ

ired.

Obj

ecto

rPr

elim

inar

y Pl

an 1

5/00

26Re

spon

se to

Obj

ectio

n/Ap

plic

atio

n fo

r Eas

emen

t

Kelly

Hen

ders

on-

Curr

ent s

tatu

tory

pro

cess

is d

efec

tive

-Fa

ils to

com

ply

with

the

requ

irem

ents

of

the

Road

s (O

peni

ng a

nd C

losin

g) A

ct-

Prop

oses

to d

amag

e th

e Pa

rk L

ands

-Se

eks a

n ea

sem

ent f

or p

ark

land

s use

inac

cord

ance

with

the

orig

inal

rese

rvat

ion

and

dedi

catio

nof

the

land

for t

hein

habi

tant

s of t

he C

ity o

f Ade

laid

e

The

stat

utor

y re

quire

men

ts o

f the

Roa

ds (O

peni

ngan

d Cl

osin

g) A

ct w

ere

follo

wed

by

the

Coun

cil–

incl

udin

g th

e re

quire

d no

tice,

the

stat

emen

t of

effe

cted

per

sons

, and

pro

visio

n of

rele

vant

info

rmat

ion:

-Th

ere

is no

evi

denc

e of

a b

reac

h to

Sec

tion

9(S

tate

men

t of P

erso

ns)

-Th

e ro

ads p

roce

ss is

aut

horis

ed b

y th

eRo

ads

(Ope

ning

and

Clo

sing)

Act 1

991

-ther

e is

no b

reac

hof

trus

t or d

uty.

-As

no

info

rmat

ion

has b

een

prov

ided

tode

mon

stra

te h

ow th

eno

min

ated

per

son

has b

een

“sub

stan

tially

affe

cted

” by

the

road

pro

cess

, Ms

Hend

erso

nis

not e

ntitl

ed to

mak

e an

app

licat

ion

for e

asem

enta

s a “

pers

on a

ffect

ed”

purs

uant

toSe

ctio

n 13

of t

heRo

ads (

Open

ing

and

Clos

ing)

Act

1991

.

The

Crow

n So

licito

rs O

ffice

has

revi

ewed

the

proc

edur

al a

spec

ts o

f the

not

ifica

tion

proc

ess.

-N

o fu

rthe

r act

ion

requ

ired.

Obj

ecto

rPr

elim

inar

y Pl

an 1

5/00

26Re

spon

se to

Obj

ectio

n/Ap

plic

atio

n fo

r Eas

emen

t

APA

Grou

p-

APA

man

ages

the

gas d

istrib

utio

n sy

stem

for A

ustr

alia

n Ga

s Net

wor

ks (S

A) L

td

-Ga

s mai

ns a

re lo

cate

d w

ithin

sect

ions

of

the

prop

osed

road

clo

sure

.

-Re

quire

men

t for

eas

emen

t and

asso

ciat

ed w

orks

to re

loca

te a

nd/o

r cap

exist

ing

infr

astr

uctu

re

-N

o ob

ject

ion:

furt

her i

nfor

mat

ion

requ

ired

inre

latio

n to

the

final

layo

ut o

f the

re-p

ositi

oned

road

way

. Sol

utio

n–

eith

er a

ccep

t an

ease

men

t or

relo

cate

exi

stin

g ne

twor

k as

sets

out

side

the

road

foot

prin

t (an

d ca

p re

dund

ant i

nfra

stru

ctur

e). C

ost

of w

orks

bor

ne b

y th

ird p

artie

s.

-N

egot

iate

d ou

tcom

e w

ith D

PTIt

o en

sure

fina

l roa

dpl

an a

ddre

sses

thes

e m

atte

rs.

Elec

traN

et-

Tran

smiss

ion

Less

or C

orpo

ratio

n ha

s an

inte

rest

in th

e ex

istin

g Ri

ght o

f Way

ove

r“B

” in

A10

, DP7

4256

. New

road

way

will

extin

guish

par

t of t

his R

OW

.

-Ac

cess

from

the

new

road

way

to th

ere

mai

ning

por

tion

of th

e RO

W is

requ

ired

for h

eavy

veh

icle

acc

ess t

o a

high

vol

tage

elec

tric

ity in

fras

truc

ture

.

-A

fibre

opt

ic te

leco

mm

unic

atio

ns c

able

cros

ses t

hrou

gh th

e pa

th o

f the

new

road

way

. An

ease

men

t may

be

requ

ired

over

the

port

ion

of ro

ad to

be

clos

ed.

-N

o ob

ject

ion:

pro

vide

d th

at th

e iss

ues r

elat

ing

toac

cess

to th

e rig

ht o

f way

and

an

ease

men

t for

thei

rfib

re o

ptic

cab

le a

re a

ddre

ssed

.

-N

egot

iate

d ou

tcom

e w

ith D

PTI t

o en

sure

fina

l roa

dpl

an a

ddre

sses

thes

e m

atte

rs.

O-Bahn City Access Project East Terrace & Rundle Street ... · This report details a proposal for...

Documents

Transcript of O-Bahn City Access Project East Terrace & Rundle Street ... · This report details a proposal for...